” Contemporary Slavery: A Case of Mistaken Identity? ”
-
Upload
maggy-mooney -
Category
Documents
-
view
33 -
download
5
description
Transcript of ” Contemporary Slavery: A Case of Mistaken Identity? ”
”Contemporary Slavery: A Case of
Mistaken Identity?” Paul Nugent
Professor of Comparative African History/Director,
Centre of African Studies, University of Edinburgh
Ethan Kapstein:
When most people think about slavery – if they think about it at all – they probably assume that it was eliminated during the nineteenth century. Unfortunately, this is far from the truth. Slavery and global slave trade continue to thrive to this day; in fact, it is likely that more people are being trafficked across borders against their will than at any point in the past… Whatever the exact number is, it seems almost certain that the modern global slave trade is larger than absolute terms than the Atlantic slave trade in the eighteenth and nineteenth century slave trade was
Brick-making
Brick-making in India
Brazil
Camel Jockeys to UAE
UN Office of Commissioner for Human Rights
The word ‘slavery’ today covers a wide variety of human rights violations. In addition to traditional slavery and the slave trade, these abuses include the sale of children, child prostitution, child pornography, the exploitation of child labour, the sexual mutilation of female children, the use of children in armed conflicts, debt bondage, the traffic in persons and in the sale of human organs, the exploitation of prostitution, and certain practices under apartheid and colonial regimes
Four Features of Slavery
1. Violence as the Founding Act (Claude Meillassoux)
2. A Market Mechanism3. Slavery as Social Death (Orlando
Patterson)4. Policing the Boundaries Between
Slave and Free
1. Violence
1. Child Soldiers (e.g. Liberia, Sierra Leone, Uganda)
2. Military Abductees (e.g. Dinkas by Baggara in Sudan)
3. Abduction for Sexual Trafficking (e.g. China)
BUT: deception = violence?
Former LRA Abductees
2. Marketing of Slaves
1. Transfer of Rights in People (Mauritania, Niger)
2. Debt bondage and child labour (e.g. India, Pakistan, Nepal)
3. Slave as Non-Person
1. Ideology of kinship as a mask for continuity of slave relations (e.g. Mauritania/Niger): naming, dress, work, living space
But: caste is not = slavery
Mauritania
4. Boundary Maintenance
Where are the Slaveholding Classes?: the Problem of Defining Trafficking as Slavery
A summary of the resultsForm Violence Market Non-Per Bound.
Mauritania Yes, origin Yes Yes Yes, but…
Debt bond(S.Asia)
No Yes No, but caste logics
maybe
Sex Slav(Thailand)
No Yes No maybe
Wives (China)
Yes, abducted
Yes No No
Child soldiers
Yes No, but Sudan
No No
TraffickingEU/USA
No Yes No No
Does the Terminological Confusion Really Matter?
A. The Narrative of New Slavery -Kevin Bales:
1. “dramatic increase in world population world War II
2. “Modernization and the globalization of the world economy have shattered these traditional families and the small-scale subsistence farming that supported them
3. Corrupt elites
Does the Terminological Confusion Really Matter
(2)Getting tough on trafficking as the thin
end of the wedge for migrants - need for a new discourse of human rights which asserts the fundamental right to mobility. Tighter controls merely mean higher economic rents for traffickers
Beware the new imperialism (remembering the hypocrisy of the old one)
Kapstein again
“To complement sanctions, Western states should also empower their police, intelligence and military force to act much more aggressively against those who traffic in humans. Just as force was ultimately needed to halt the slave trade in the nineteenth century, so will force be necessary in some cases today.”
Preventing trafficking?