… and what about positive Darwinian selection?

53
1 … and what about positive Darwinian selection?

description

… and what about positive Darwinian selection?. We have already discussed a test based on the ratio of fixed to polymorphic differences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of … and what about positive Darwinian selection?

Page 1: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

1

… and what about positive Darwinian selection?

Page 2: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

2

We have already discussed a test based on the ratio of fixed

to polymorphic differences

We note that the McDonald-Kreitman test requires data from many individuals from two populations or species. Let’s assume we only have one sequence from each species.

Page 3: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

3

Page 4: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

4

The KA/KS test requires two aligned sequences only.

Page 5: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

5

Page 6: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

6

The assumptions of this method are: (1)all synonymous mutations are neutral, i.e., they do not affect the fitness of the organism, (2) nonsynoymous mutations can be advantageous, neutral, or deleterious, (3) nonsynonymous mutations that are advantageous will undergo fixation in a population much more rapidly than neutral mutations.

If advantageous selection plays a major role in the evolution of a protein, then the rate of nonsynonymous substitution should exceed the rate of synonymous substitution.

Page 7: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

7

If positive selection predominates, then KA/KS > 1

If neutrality predominates, then KA/KS << 1

Page 8: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

8

Prevalence of positive selection

3,595 groups of homologous sequences

In 17 gene groups, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution was significantly larger than 1.

Endo T, Ikeo K, Gojobori T. 1996. Large-scale search for genes on which positive selection may operate. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:685-690.

~ 0.45%~ 0.45%

Page 9: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

9

Prevalence of positive selection

7,645 homologous gene groups from human, chimpanzee, and mouse.

In 6 groups, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution was significantly larger than 1, i.e., experienced positive Darwinian selection (Clark et al. 2003). ~ 0.08%~ 0.08%

Page 10: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

10

The vast majority of The vast majority of molecular evolution molecular evolution is neutral.is neutral. Change = EquivalenceChange = Equivalence

Page 11: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

11

Examples of extreme KA/KS values (>>1):

(1) Glycophorin C = a red-cell membrane protein that serves as the receptor for a Plasmodium falciparum erythrocyte-binding protein, hence mediating one of P. falciparum’s invasion pathways in humans. Selective factor? Malaria.

(2) Granulysin = a protein secreted by cytotoxic T cells when they attach to infected body cells. It creates holes in pathogens, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosi, and destroys them. Granulysin also induces apoptosis in infected cells. Selective factor? Tuberculosis.

Page 12: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

12

Elevated KA/KS ratios are frequently found in sex-related genes, e.g., genes involved in mating behavior, fertilization, spermatogenesis, ejaculation, or sex determination.

Page 13: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

13

Sperm lysin

Red: Nonsynonymous/Synonymous >> 1Green: Nonsynonymous/Synonymous ~ 1Gray: Nonsynonymous/Synonymous << 1

Page 14: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

14

One of the highest KA/KS ratios (= 5.15) for a full-length protein was found in the 18-kilodalton protein in the acrosomal vesicle at the anterior of the sperm cell of several abalone species.

Page 15: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

15

It is thought that sex-related genes are subject to positive selection for short periods of time during speciation as a means of erecting reproductive barriers that restrict gene flow between the speciating populations.

Page 16: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

16

Page 17: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

17

“A total of 585 of the 13,454 human-chimpanzee orthologs (4.4%) have observed KA/KS > 1.”

“Simulations show that estimates of KA/KS > 1 would be expected to occur simply by chance in at least 263 cases, if purifying selection is allowed to act non-uniformly across genes.”

583−263

13,454×100 = 2.4%

Page 18: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

18

Methodological caveats: (1) The KA/KS test can only detect positive selection if the proportion of nonsynonymous substitutions that are adaptive is >70%. (2) The KA/KS test can only detect positive selection if it occurred recently.(3) The KA/KS test can only detect positive selection if there are few reversals (e.g., A to T to A).

Page 19: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

19

Page 20: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

20

Page 21: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

21

In the KA/KS test we assumed that all synonymous changes are neutral.

It is possible, however, that not all synonymous changes are neutral.

Page 22: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

22

For example, the fitness effects of synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations were experimentally shown to exhibit almost identical distributions in two protein-coding genes of Salmonella typhimurium (Lind et al. 2010).

In other words, a synonymous mutation was as likely to be deleterious as a nonsynonymous one.

Page 23: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

23

Page 24: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

24

What is the proportion of synonymous mutations by codon position?

First codon position = 6%Second codon position = 0% Third codon position = 69%

What is the proportion of neutral mutations by codon position?

First codon position = 21%Second codon position = 7% Third codon position = 42%

Page 25: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

25

What is the proportion of synonymous mutations by codon position?

Second codon position = 0% Third codon position = 69%

What is the proportion of neutral mutations by codon position?

Second codon position = 7% Third codon position = 42%

Page 26: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

26

What is the proportion of synonymous mutations by codon position?

Second codon position = 0% Third codon position = 69%

What is the proportion of neutral mutations by codon position?

Second codon position = 7%Third codon position = 42%

some

nonsynon

ymous

substitu

tions

are comp

letely

neutralSome synonymous substitutions are deleterious

Page 27: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

27

Page 28: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

28

Page 29: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

29

Homoplasy = A structural resemblance that is due to parallelism or convergent evolution, rather than to common ancestry.

Page 30: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

30Are the horns homologous or homoplastic structures?

Page 31: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

31

Hair Bone

Page 32: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

32

Page 33: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

33

Page 34: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

34

Page 35: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

35

Pisciformy(fish shape)

Page 36: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

36

Myrmecophagy(ant-eating)

Page 37: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

37

Active flight has evolved at least four times (in insects, pterosaurs, birds, and bats).

Bioaerial locomotion

Page 38: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

38

Page 39: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

39

Evolution of

lysozymesin

ruminants, langurs

& hoatzins

Page 40: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

40

Page 41: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

41

Foregut fermenters are not herbivores, they are bacteriovores!

Food for bacteria

Page 42: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

42

Foregut fermentation has arisen independently at least three times in the evolution of placental mammals, at least once in marsupials, and at least once in birds.

Page 43: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

43

Ruminants (e.g., cows, deer, sheep, giraffes)

Page 44: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

44

Colobus guereza

Colobine monkeys (e.g.,

langurs)

Page 45: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

45

Page 46: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

46Opisthocomus hoazin

Hoatzin (pronouced Watson), an enigmatic South American bird (most probably related to the cuckoos).

Page 47: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

47Choloepus didactylus

Page 48: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

48

QuokkaSetonix brachyurus

Page 49: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

49

Convergent amino-acid replacements in lysozymes from the foregut of cow and langur. Only convergent replacements are shown, denoted by a one-letter abbreviation of the resultant amino acid followed by the position number at which the replacement occurred.

Page 50: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

50

Adaptive replacements contribute to a better performance of lysozyme at low pH and confer protection against the proteolytic activities in the stomach.

Page 51: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

51

Position 87

Page 52: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

52

Position 87

Page 53: … and what about  positive Darwinian selection?

53