] ACQUISITION LEARNING
Transcript of ] ACQUISITION LEARNING
] ACQUISITION LEARNING [ A COMPARISON OF ACQUISITION EXPERIENCE IN SIMILAR &
CULTURALLY/INSTITUTIONALLY DISSIMILAR ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGS
Daniel Degischer MCI Management Center Innsbruck Lucas Huter SMA Research Lab Manuel Erlacher SMA Research Lab Florian Bauer MCI Management Center Innsbruck
Relevance of Mergers & Acquisitions
2.33 trillion USD 27,830 deals
Deal Volume 2013* Number of Deals 2013*
Picture credits: http://raumausstattung48.de/steuern-sparen/ *Bloomberg, 2013 2
Relevance of cross-border M&A
Deal Volume 2013 (cross-border only)
Number of Deals 2013 (cross-border only)
1.05 trillion USD 9,307 deals
45.2% 33.4%
Picture credits: http://raumausstattung48.de/steuern-sparen/ *Bloomberg, 2013 3
M&A – A success story?
Picture credits: http://www.freebievectors.com/de/abbildung/66687/coole-dreidimensionale-flamme-vektor-die-hohe-der-flamme/ *Bower, 2001; Cartwright & Schoenberg, 2006 4
M&A – A success story?
Picture credits: http://www.freebievectors.com/de/abbildung/66687/coole-dreidimensionale-flamme-vektor-die-hohe-der-flamme/ **Economist, 1999 *Christensen et al., 2011
5
Performance
# of deals
Performance
# of deals
Performance
# of deals
Barkema, Bell & Pennings, 1996 Haleblian & Finkelstein, 1999 Uhlenbruck, Hitt & Semadini, 2006
Hayward, 2002 Zollo & Singh, 2004
Performance
# of deals
Performance
# of deals
No significant
relationship
Acquisition Learning
6
Idiosyncracies of cross-border M&A
settings in cross-border M&A
7
Research Gap
“Mergers and Acquisitions are still a puzzle for academics and
practitioners. Despite the considerable number of transactions carried out
so far, the acquiring firms´ performances are, on average, disappointing.”
(Capasso & Meglio, 2005)
“[…] we know very little about cross-border acquisitions, and yet their
number has been increasing in recent years.“ (Collins et al., 2009)
“[…] consistent findings on the relationship between acquisition experience
and postacquisition performance do not exist.“ (King et al., 2004)
“[…] a more systematic approach is needed to understand the learning mechanisms operative in complex cross-border M&As.” (Shimizu et al., 2004) ] [
8
Model Development
9
Sample description I/II
listed on Frankfurt Stock-Exchange
01/01/2007 until 01/01/2010
100% stock ownership
at least 2 acquisitions (serial acquirer)
completeness of data
sample size: 230 acquisitions
10
Sample description II/II
11
Overall Result
n=230
r²=0.022
ß=-0.148
p=0.025 perf
orm
ance
number of acquisitions
-0.148*
n = number of observations ß = beta coefficient, explaining the relationship between number of acquisitions (experience) and acquisition performance r² = coefficient of determination (quality of a model) p = statistical significance; n.s. = not significant; † p < 0.10; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001
overall experience-performance relationship
12
Refined Results
perf
orm
ance
number of acquisitions
0.102n.s. 0.365†
international diversification unrelated diversification
market penetration product diversification
ß=0.102 p=0.495
n=47 r²=0.010
ß=0.365 p=0.1
n=21 r²=0.133
BASA
AASA
perf
orm
ance
number of acquisitions
0.435** -0.308*
ß=0.435 p=0.01
n=34 r²=0.189
ß=-0.308 p=0.05
n=41 r²=0.095
BASA
AASA
perf
orm
ance
number of acquisitions
0.583** 0.699*
ß=0.583 p=0.01
n=18 r²=0.340
ß=0.699 p=0.036
n=9 r²=0.489
BASA
AASA
perf
orm
ance
number of acquisitions
0.488** -0.083n.s.
ß=0.488 p=0.007
n=29 r²=0.238
ß=-0.083 p=0.655
n=31 r²=0.007
BASA
AASA
13
Implications
Different results for domestic and cross-border acquisitions.
Higher degree of complexity
in cross-border settings.
Institutional environment
Additional cultural layer
Assumption: In cross-border settings, an acquirer needs
more time between two deals to digest experiences from previous acquisitions.
14
Limitations
] study focuses solely on German serial acquirer [
] relatively short study period [
] relatively small sample size for particular strategic intentions [
] share price as a performance measure [
] assumption that culture stops at national border [
15
Discussion
Picture credits: http://www.wolf-pac.com/discussion
questions comments ideas
16
Thank you!
Picture credits: http://www.abaenglish.com/blog/english-vocabulary-learn-english-with-aba/the-origin-of-please/ 17
] BACKUP [
SIC & Country code classification
19
Acquirer Target SIC code
acquirer
SIC
code
target
Country
code
acquirer
Country
code
target
Diversification
strategy
Bechtle AG
ITZ GmbH
7371 ≠ 8748 GER = GER product
diversification
Bechtle AG Support EDV
Handels GmbH 7371 = 7379 GER ≠ AUT
international
diversification
Bechtle AG Coma Services
AG 7371 ≠ 4731 GER ≠ CH
unrelated
diversification
Bechtle AG
PSB AG 7371 = 7379 GER = GER market
penetration
Acquisition dispersion across acquirer
20
37
14
3 4 3 5
1 1 1 0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Num
ber o
f acq
uire
r
Number of acquisitions per acquirer
∑ 69 acquirer
Sample dispersion across regions I/II
21
180
29 17
2 2 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Europe America Asia Australia Africa
Num
ber o
f acq
uisi
tions
∑ 230 acquisitions
Germ
any:
95
othe
rs: 8
5
Sample dispersion across regions II/II
22
domestic cross-border
95
15
70
50
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
GER AUT & CH Rest of Europe Rest of World
Num
ber o
f acq
uisi
tions
Year-end share prices
] accessible [
] comparable [
] guaranteed completeness of data [
23 Picture credits: http://www.keinhing.com/Share%20Price.html
Literature I/II
Barkema, H.G., Bell, J.H.J., & Pennings, J.M. (1996). Foreign entry, cultural barriers, and learning. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 151-166.
Bloomberg. (2013). Mergers & acquisitions rankings 2013. Retrieved from Bloomberg website: http://www.bloomberg.com/professional/content/uploads/sites/2/2014/01/M-and-A-2013.pdf
Bower, J.L. (2001). Not all M&As are alike – and that matters. Harvard Business Review, 79 (3), 93-101.
Capasso, A., & Meglio, O. (2005). Knowledge transfer in mergers and acquisitions: How frequent acquirers learn to manage the integration process. In A. Capasso, G.B. Dagnino & A. Lanza (Eds.), Strategic capabilities and knowledge transfer within and between organizations: New perspectives from acquisitions, networks, learning and evolution (pp. 199-225). Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Cartwright, S., & Schoenberg, R. (2006). Thirty years of mergers and acquisitions research: recent advances and future opportunities. British Journal of Management, 17, 1-5.
Christensen, C.M., Alton, R., Rising, C., & Waldeck, A. (2011). The new M&A playbook. Harvard Business Review, 89 (3), 48-57.
Collins, J.D., Holcomb, T.R., Certo, S.T., Hitt, M.A., & Lester, R.H. (2009). Learning by doing: Cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Business Research, 62, 1329-1334.
Economist (1999, Dec. 2). Faites vos jeux. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/264987
24
Literature II/II
Haleblian, J., & Finkelstein, S. (1999). The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 29-56.
Hayward, M.L.A. (2002). When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990-1995. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 21-39.
King, D.R., Dalton, D.R., Daily, C.M., & Covin, J.G. (2004). Meta-Analyses of post-acquisition performance: indications of unidentified moderators. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 187-200.
Shimizu, K., Hitt, M.A., Vaidyanath, D., & Pisano, V. (2004). Theoretical foundations of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A review of current research and recommendations for the future. Journal of International Management, 10, 307-353.
Uhlenbruck, K., Hitt, M.A., & Semadeni, M. (2006). Market value effects of acquisitions involving internet firms: A resource-based analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 899-913.
Zollo, M., & Singh, H. (2004). Deliberate learning in corporate acquisitions: Post-acquisition strategies and integration capability in U.S. bank mergers. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1233-1256.
25