Извештај во сенка за комисија во сенка

Click here to load reader

  • date post

    23-Jul-2016
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    238
  • download

    8

Embed Size (px)

description

ФОНДАЦИЈА ОТВОРЕНО ОПШТЕСТВО

Transcript of Извештај во сенка за комисија во сенка

  • A Closer Look at the Application of the Laws 1

  • 10

  • 1

  • 2

    :

    : -

    : ,

    : -

    :

    :

    :

    :

    :600

    /

  • 3

    , 2012

  • 4

    CIP - . ,

    35.075.2:342.724(497.7)2011(047)

    , / [ ; ; , ]. : , 2012. 76, 76 . ; 21

    . . : Shadow report for shadowed Commission report on the Commission for protection from Discriminations performance in the first year of operation. . . . .

    ISBN 978-608-218-142-4

    , []). 2011 COBISS.MK-ID 91431434

  • 5

    .......................................................................................................................8

    ............................................................................................................................... 11

    1. ............................................... 181.1 ............................................................................ 181.2 (,

    ) - ......241.2.1 ....................................................................................241.2.2 - ............................................................... 27

    1.3 ..........291.3.1 .................................................................................291.3.2 ........................................................30

    2. ...........................................................................322.1 ............................................................................................322.2 (,

    , ) ....................................................................... 332.3 ...............................................................................................352.4 ( ) ......................36

    3. ...........................................................................383.1 .............................................38

    3.1.1 , .......................38

    3.1.2 ..................................................................... 41

  • 6

    3.1.3 .......................................... 41

    3.1.4 ..............................................................................42

    3.1.5 , ...................................................43

    3.1.6 , ................................................................46

    3.1.7 .47

    3.1.8 ...........................................................48

    3.1.9 - .....................................................................49

    3.1.10 , , , ......................................................................49

    3.1.11 , ................................................................ 51

    3.1.12 ................................................................................52

    3.2 ...................................543.3 ...............................................543.4 .................................553.5 ....................................................................................55

    .................................................................................................56

    - .................................................................... 61

    1 - ........................62 2 - ......................................................................................... 71 3 - ............................................................... 75 4 - ( 8.1.2012) ........................................ 76 5 - .............................................................................78 6 - ..........................................................................................80

  • 7

  • 8

    (). , . , , . , , , .

    , . , .

  • 9

    , , .

    , , .

  • 10

  • 11

    . , , .

    , , . , , . 90- , . , :

    ( );.

    ( ).,

    (, , ).

  • 12

    , , .

    -,1 / , , . , , , , . , , , , .2 conditio sine quae non ( )

    1 - (Holtmaat R., (2006), Catalysts for Change?Equality bodies according to Directive 2000/43/EC, European Network of Legal Ex-perts in the non-discrimination field, European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social AffairsAnd Equal OpportunitiesUnit G.2, Cormack J., Bell M., (2005), Developing anti-discrimination law In Europe, The 25 EU member states compared, The european network of independent ex-perts in the non-discrimination field, Evelin, E. (2005), EU antidiscrimination law, Oxford University Press, Report on the role, structure and functioning of specialised bodies to promoteequality and/or combat discrimination Final Report (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/activities/07-seminar_national_specialised_bodies_2003/NSBR2003_ExplanatoryNote_en.asp), Niessen, J., (2002), Making the law work - The enforcement and implementa-tion of anti-discrimination legislation, Paper presented at the Danish EU Presidency Conference on the Implementation of the Anti-discrimination Directives into National Law, Copenhagen), Examples of good practices : spe-cialised bodies to combat racism, xenophobia, antisemitism and intolerance at national level COE January 2006 (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/Good_practices/1-Specialised%20Bodies/ecri06-5%20Good%20practices%20specialised%20bodies%202005.pdf)

    2 http://www.equineteurope.org/

  • 13

    3, , 4. / 5 .6

    , , , , .7 , , . , . , , , .

    3 - , ( , 1976 ).

    4 - : ., (2009), - , . 1 .

    5 Commission on Human Rights Resolution 1992/54;General Assembly Resolu-tion A/RES/48/143.The Paris Principles can be found at: http://www.unhchr.ch/Huridocda/Huridoca.nsf/(Symbol)/A.RES.48.134.En?Opendocument

    6 General Policy Recommendation no 2 of the ECRI can be found at: http://www.coe.int/t/e/human_rights/ecri/1-ecri/3-general_themes/1-policy_recommen-dations/recommendation_n2/Rec02en.pdf

    7 Niessen and Cormack National specialised equality bodies in the wake of the EC antidiscrimination Directives, in:Cormack, Janet (ed.), Considerations for estab-lishing single equality bodies and integrated equality legislation 2004, p. 21

  • 14

    :1. ;2. ( );3. ;4. , 5.

    . ,

    ( ), , , , . , ( , , , , , .).

    2000/43/EC, - , :8

    ; , ; .

    , .. .9 , :

    8 (2006), Catalysts for Change? Equality bodies according to Directive 2000/43/EC - Existence, independence and effectiveness Rikki Holtmaat European Net-work of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs And Equal Opportunities Unit G.2

    9 , , 1991.

  • 15

    ; ; ( ); ; ; , .

    .10

    2010 ( ), 1.1.2011 . , , . , ( ). 2010 , 2011 . , ( ,11 ) ( , ).

    10 2011 , (http://www.ombudsman.mk/).

    11 , , 0,69% , ( ) () .

  • 16

    , , , , . , , . , ,12 , . , , . , ( ) . . , :

    1. ( , );

    2. (, );3. (

    ), 4. (

    ).

    12 , 24 1, 6

  • 17

    13:

    1. - 2011 ;

    2. ;

    3. ;

    4. , 14.

    13 , , 1 .

    14 2 .

  • 18

    1.

    / , , , . : , .

    1.1 ,

    .15 . 16 1 .16 ,

    15 IV (http://www.kzd.mk/phocadownload/zakon-za-sprecuvanje-i-zastita-od-dis-kriminacija.pdf)

    16 1 16,: .

  • 19

    .17 - 18 .19

    . 20, :

    )