Извештај во сенка за комисија во сенка
date post
23-Jul-2016Category
Documents
view
238download
8
Embed Size (px)
description
Transcript of Извештај во сенка за комисија во сенка
A Closer Look at the Application of the Laws 1
10
1
2
:
: -
: ,
: -
:
:
:
:
:600
/
3
, 2012
4
CIP - . ,
35.075.2:342.724(497.7)2011(047)
, / [ ; ; , ]. : , 2012. 76, 76 . ; 21
. . : Shadow report for shadowed Commission report on the Commission for protection from Discriminations performance in the first year of operation. . . . .
ISBN 978-608-218-142-4
, []). 2011 COBISS.MK-ID 91431434
5
.......................................................................................................................8
............................................................................................................................... 11
1. ............................................... 181.1 ............................................................................ 181.2 (,
) - ......241.2.1 ....................................................................................241.2.2 - ............................................................... 27
1.3 ..........291.3.1 .................................................................................291.3.2 ........................................................30
2. ...........................................................................322.1 ............................................................................................322.2 (,
, ) ....................................................................... 332.3 ...............................................................................................352.4 ( ) ......................36
3. ...........................................................................383.1 .............................................38
3.1.1 , .......................38
3.1.2 ..................................................................... 41
6
3.1.3 .......................................... 41
3.1.4 ..............................................................................42
3.1.5 , ...................................................43
3.1.6 , ................................................................46
3.1.7 .47
3.1.8 ...........................................................48
3.1.9 - .....................................................................49
3.1.10 , , , ......................................................................49
3.1.11 , ................................................................ 51
3.1.12 ................................................................................52
3.2 ...................................543.3 ...............................................543.4 .................................553.5 ....................................................................................55
.................................................................................................56
- .................................................................... 61
1 - ........................62 2 - ......................................................................................... 71 3 - ............................................................... 75 4 - ( 8.1.2012) ........................................ 76 5 - .............................................................................78 6 - ..........................................................................................80
7
8
(). , . , , . , , , .
, . , .
9
, , .
, , .
10
11
. , , .
, , . , , . 90- , . , :
( );.
( ).,
(, , ).
12
, , .
-,1 / , , . , , , , . , , , , .2 conditio sine quae non ( )
1 - (Holtmaat R., (2006), Catalysts for Change?Equality bodies according to Directive 2000/43/EC, European Network of Legal Ex-perts in the non-discrimination field, European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social AffairsAnd Equal OpportunitiesUnit G.2, Cormack J., Bell M., (2005), Developing anti-discrimination law In Europe, The 25 EU member states compared, The european network of independent ex-perts in the non-discrimination field, Evelin, E. (2005), EU antidiscrimination law, Oxford University Press, Report on the role, structure and functioning of specialised bodies to promoteequality and/or combat discrimination Final Report (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/activities/07-seminar_national_specialised_bodies_2003/NSBR2003_ExplanatoryNote_en.asp), Niessen, J., (2002), Making the law work - The enforcement and implementa-tion of anti-discrimination legislation, Paper presented at the Danish EU Presidency Conference on the Implementation of the Anti-discrimination Directives into National Law, Copenhagen), Examples of good practices : spe-cialised bodies to combat racism, xenophobia, antisemitism and intolerance at national level COE January 2006 (http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/monitoring/ecri/Good_practices/1-Specialised%20Bodies/ecri06-5%20Good%20practices%20specialised%20bodies%202005.pdf)
2 http://www.equineteurope.org/
13
3, , 4. / 5 .6
, , , , .7 , , . , . , , , .
3 - , ( , 1976 ).
4 - : ., (2009), - , . 1 .
5 Commission on Human Rights Resolution 1992/54;General Assembly Resolu-tion A/RES/48/143.The Paris Principles can be found at: http://www.unhchr.ch/Huridocda/Huridoca.nsf/(Symbol)/A.RES.48.134.En?Opendocument
6 General Policy Recommendation no 2 of the ECRI can be found at: http://www.coe.int/t/e/human_rights/ecri/1-ecri/3-general_themes/1-policy_recommen-dations/recommendation_n2/Rec02en.pdf
7 Niessen and Cormack National specialised equality bodies in the wake of the EC antidiscrimination Directives, in:Cormack, Janet (ed.), Considerations for estab-lishing single equality bodies and integrated equality legislation 2004, p. 21
14
:1. ;2. ( );3. ;4. , 5.
. ,
( ), , , , . , ( , , , , , .).
2000/43/EC, - , :8
; , ; .
, .. .9 , :
8 (2006), Catalysts for Change? Equality bodies according to Directive 2000/43/EC - Existence, independence and effectiveness Rikki Holtmaat European Net-work of Legal Experts in the non-discrimination field European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs And Equal Opportunities Unit G.2
9 , , 1991.
15
; ; ( ); ; ; , .
.10
2010 ( ), 1.1.2011 . , , . , ( ). 2010 , 2011 . , ( ,11 ) ( , ).
10 2011 , (http://www.ombudsman.mk/).
11 , , 0,69% , ( ) () .
16
, , , , . , , . , ,12 , . , , . , ( ) . . , :
1. ( , );
2. (, );3. (
), 4. (
).
12 , 24 1, 6
17
13:
1. - 2011 ;
2. ;
3. ;
4. , 14.
13 , , 1 .
14 2 .
18
1.
/ , , , . : , .
1.1 ,
.15 . 16 1 .16 ,
15 IV (http://www.kzd.mk/phocadownload/zakon-za-sprecuvanje-i-zastita-od-dis-kriminacija.pdf)
16 1 16,: .
19
.17 - 18 .19
. 20, :
)