شبیهساری هیدرودینامیکی راکتورهای کاتالیستی
description
Transcript of شبیهساری هیدرودینامیکی راکتورهای کاتالیستی
-
52 ...
:
*
ri.ipir@rhahkidammahoM
37
44-52 2931 : 01/4/09
: 71/5/19
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(K .m/W 60/0)
.
.
.
06 %
-
62 37
.
( 0003 )
[1-5].
.
.
.
[5].
.
.
1
.
[6 7].
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
(1)
(mS)
- .
:
(2)
(3)
:
(4)
F
( )
(DFC) scimanyD diulF lanoitatupmoC .1
-
72 ...
5
.
(5)
1 2 3
.
[8] .
-k +y
03 003 m 100000/0
[6 7 9-11].
.
.
k
[21]:
(6)
(7)
G [8]. T
k . 4
(1C 2C k)
[31].
.
5
.
[31]:
(8)
ffek
[31]:
(9)
.
.
.
.
.
. .
.
.
.
.
.
( )
( )
.
.
.
-
82 37
.
: 1-
2- .
.
.
.
.
E 1DTR
.
[41] .
.
.
.
(s /3m( V .
0=t xamC
petsC t .
99/99 %
.
S
.
( ) .
petsC F
.
F
E .
mc 5
[51].
mm 88 . 1
.
(
).
.
1
.
.
1 .
( ) .
(" 1 morhC) .
. 1
5854813
.
2 49 .
noitubirtsiD emiT ecnediseR .149 tsacneerG .2
-
92 ...
yG
1- ( )
. 3
.
.
.
.
.
. 2
4
.
.
[61 71].
.
( 07%) K.gk/Jk
52421 K.m/W 24553/0 [81].
-
03 37
26R -
rg/2m 002 .
K.gk/J 567
K.m/W 31 3m/gk 5793 [91].
K.gk/J 6401 K.m/W 6332/0
3m/gk 7/675 [91].
[61].
K.gk/J 567 K.m/W 58/1.
3m/gk 0052 .
73/0 .
1
.
.
2- ( 4 5845813 )
) m
s/ (
(m)1 6/0- 1-8/0-4/0-2/0-02/04/06/08/0
4
3
2
7
6
5
1
0
12345
.
. F 77
K.2m/W 01 .
01 .
.
.
2 .
( 3).
-
13 ...
1- [51]
883514544 (gisP)
873104234 (gisP)
000100010001 (F)
899189119 (F)
848/51 (F)
2-
(3m) (3m/W)
991860/01080655- ()
314902/6110857- ()
721221/923/0827- ()
17547236/00038488 ()
44296715/00043732 ()
3-
.
2
. 2
.
[51 02 12].
52/0
.
.
-
23 37
(
)
.
4 6 .
-k .
73/0 .
.
.
.
.
2 .
.
F 0001 .
.
.
.
7 .
.
4-
5-
-
33 ...
6-
7- (gk/J)
7
.
.
( 3-4 ).
.
( 8) .
.
(
)
.
9 .
. 9
.
.
.
.
-
43 37
8-
51025203(m)
056
K)
(
9-
0501006
008
058
057
007
(
) .
.
.
.
01 .
. 01
.
(
)
.
.
4 6 . 3
.
3
.
-
53 ...
408
808
608
208
697
008
897
497
507/0
297
097
097
505/0 503/0
018
038
505/1 503/1
037
017501/1 509/0
057
077
(m)
K) (
K) (
01-
3 -
(K)
(K)
(%)
(K)
(K)
(%)
32/596/1273384/1670tes7829/018
45/170/8872273/0082/0862/9087829/018
09/094/2087618/90844/0673/7087829/018
: K 8/68 K 9/81 K 1/3 W
90976 W 51578 W 464321 2m/W 4651 2m/W
9651 2m/W 9551 W 888872.
.
6%
.
K 78 .
.
.
.
.
(11-)
-k .
.
.
.
F 0001 .
-
63 37
( 11-)
.
-k elbazilaeR 1MSR
.
(11-) MSR
03 003 .
11-
.
ledoM ssertS sdlonyeR .1sulp-Y .2
.
4 .
( )
MSR .
4
2 .
MSR
.
4 -
sulp-y
(W)
(W)
(W)
(W)
988872464321515789097601<
-
73 ...
.
.
m 1/0
.
.
029 K.gk/J
K.m/W 60/0 3m/gk
002 [91].
. 5
. 5
.
.
83% .
21
( ).
.
. F
21 31 .
5 - -k
(W)
(W)
(W)
(W)
9888724643215157890976
779761544474962593804 (01 )
559761744472762563804 (K.m/W 60.0=k)
0000
2 0 (S)
02 4181 61 21 601 8 40
500/0
1-
10/0
20/0
520/0
510/0
30/0
40/0
540/0
530/0
50/0
2- 3-
21-
1
2
3
-
83 37
F
0
1
501510252
7/0
9/08/0
6/0
3/0
5/04/0
2/01/00
31- F
1- 2- 3-
(S)
21
51 .
.
.
(
).
.
.
.
31
.
E .
E
.
(eP)
( )
.
(mt)
.
.
.
(01)
DTR
[41] . (D)
. D
1 . L
u
.
E
.
A :
(11)
r
DTR
A .
dexiM .1
1
2
3
-
93 ...
.
.
.
1 .
[41] .
6
. 6
10/0 .
.
.
[6].
.
T
.
.
41 E
.
.
.
51 /
.
.
6 (2s) 2 )s( t
( ) eP( ) ( ) 2
6018/85311/02102/08204/937399/31
3594/311470/03731/03501/919497/11
6060/6561/06572/01/95615785/77
502 015152
30/0
03
530/0
0
10/0
500/0
520/0
500/0-
510/0
0
20/0
41- E (S)
E
2- 1-
3-
1
2
3
-
04 37
502 015152
50/0
60/0
0
10/0
40/0
20/0
0
30/0
(S)
31
4
87
3154
51- 3 .
. 1
51
.
.
(
) s/m 848/51 .
.
3 51
.
4
. 7
.
s/m 696/13
.
. 8
.
31
.
54 3
.
61 .
7
.
4
.
.
.
31
.
.
.
13
4
8
54
31
7
-
14 ...
502 015152
00
(S)
31
4875431
30/0
530/0
10/0
500/0
520/0
500/0-
510/0
0
20/0
61- 3 .
7
(2s) 2)s( t2( ) eP( ) ( )
2083/45131/03822/03855/246456/311
5674/56101/06281/03592/7824766/933
9335/02520/07840/03805/313456/614
2218/316730/04270/06323/73450/017
2313/616130/03160/02685/13580/58
0241/016890/08771/00410/2234755/2431
6755/62380/05251/01743/0715883/3354
04%
.
. MSR
.
.
sulp-y
.
6 %
.
.
.
.
3
4
8
54
31 71
-
24 37
.
.
.
2C 1C: 72C: A : A
0AC: A AC: A
D:
E:
F: E
G:
h:
j:
k:
L:
p:
eP:
r:
mS: hfS:
t:
:
T:
u:
v:
v:
x:
+y:
ffe:
f:
i: i
r:
s:
T:
x:
z:
:
:
:
T: :
:
k: :
:
: 2
2:
:
-
... 43
[1]. Padmavathi G. and Chaudhuri K. K., Modeling and simulation of commercial catalytic naphtha reformers,
Can. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 75, No. 10, pp. 930-937, 1997.
[2]. Smith R. B., Kinetic analysis of naphtha reforming with platinum catalyst, Chem. Eng. Prog., Vol. 55, No. 6,
pp. 76-80, 1959.
[2]. Fazeli A., Fatemi Sh., Mahdavian M. and Ghaee A., Mathematical modeling of an industrial naphtha reformer
with three adiabatic reactors in series, Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng., Vol. 28, No. 3, 97-102, 2009.
[3]. Zafar Q., Gevert B. and Von Sivers M., Statistical model for benzene prediction in catalytic reforming, Prepr.
Pap.-Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Fuel Chem., Vol. 48, No. 2, 660-661, 2003.
[4]. Arani H. M., Shirvani M., Safdarian K. and Dorostkar E., Lumping procedure for kinetic model of catalytic
naphtha reforming, Braz. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 26, No. 4, 723-732, 2009.
[5]. Weifeng H., Hongye S., Yongyou H. and Jian C., Modeling, Simulation and optimization of a whole industrial
catalytic naphtha reforming process on Aspen Plus platform, Chinese. J. Chem. Eng., Vol. 14, No. 5, 584-591,
2006.
[6]. Mohammadikhah R., Ziyari A., Behjat Y., Ahmadi-Marvast M., Ayazi M. and Nikbakht M., Removing mal-
distribution through a radial-flow fixed bed reactor using CFD, 6th Int. Chem. Eng. Cong., 16-20 November, Kish
Island, Iran, 2009.
[7]. Mohammadikhah R., Behjat Y., Ahmadi-Marvast M. and Nikbakht M, Ganji H., CFD application in capacity
enhancement of naphtha catalytic reforming unit of Tehran refinery, 14th Int. Oil. Gas. Petro. Cong., 19-20 may,
Tehran, Iran, 2010.
[8]. Ranade V. V., Computational flow modeling for chemical reactor engineering, Vol. 5, Academic Press., Lon-
don, UK, 2002.
. . . . . . ]9[
CFD
.1390
[10]. Mohammadikhah R., Ganji H., Ahmadi-Marvast M. and Zahedi Abghari S., Turbulence model inspection for
hydrodynamics of naphtha catalytic reactors, 7th International Chemical Engineering Congress & Exihibition, 21-
24 November, Kish Island, Iran, 2011.
[11]. Mohammadikhah R., Zahedi Abghari S., Ahmadi-Marvast M. and Ganji H., CFD simulation of catalytic naph-
tha reforming process, 7th International Chemical Engineering Congress & Exihibition, 21-24 November, Kish
Island, Iran, 2011.
[12]. K.A. Hoffmann, S.T. Chiang, Computational fluid dynamics, 4th Ed, Engineering Education SystemTM, Wich-
ita, USA, 2000.
[13]. FLUENT.6.3 User's Guide, FLUENT. Inc, USA, 2006.
[14]. Levenspiel O., Chemical reaction engineering, 2nd Ed, Wiley & Sons, New York, 1972.
[15]. Library of Tehran Refinery, Unifiner-Platformer manual: PFD No. RD-2-002, RD-202-4251, RD-202-4252,
-
73 44
RD-203-4253, 2009.
[16]. ANH Refractories Europe Ltd, www.anheurope.co.uk, 22.2.2010.
[17]. Nayyar I., Mohinder L., Piping Handbook, 7th Ed, Mc Graw Hill, New York, 2000.
[18] Reid R. C., Prausnitz J. M., and Sherwood T. K, The properties of gases and liquids, 3rd Ed., Mc Graw-Hill
Inc., pp.108-109, 1977.
[19]. Perry R. H. and Green D. W., Perrys chemical engineering handbook, 7th Ed, Mc Graw-Hill Inc., New York,
1997.
[20]. Stijepovic M. Z., Ostojic A. V., Milenkovic I. and Linke P., Development of a kinetic model for catalytic reform-
ing of naphtha and parameter estimation using industrial plant data, Energy & Fuel. J., Vol. 23, No. 6, pp.979-983,
2009.
[21]. Taskar U., Modeling and optimization of a catalytic naphtha reformer, Ph.D. Thesis, Texas Tech. University,
USA, 1996.