Structuring e-learning multi-criteria decision making problems
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Decision Making by Individuals & Groups...
-
date post
20-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
215 -
download
2
Transcript of © 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Chapter 10 Decision Making by Individuals & Groups...
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Chapter 10 Decision Making by Individuals &
Groups
Lea
rnin
g O
utc
om
es
1 Identify the steps in the decision-making process.
2 Describe various models of decision making.
3 Discuss the individual influences that affect decision making.
4 Explain how groups make decisions.
5 Describe the role culture plays in decision making.
6 Explain how organizations can improve the quality of decisions through participation.
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Learning Outcome
Identify the steps in the decision-making process.
1
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Types of Decisions
Programmed Decision
a simple, routine matter for which a manager has an established decision rule
Nonprogrammed Decision
a new, complex decision that requires a creative solution
Recognize the problem and the need for a decision
Gather and evaluate dataand diagnose the situation
Identify the objective ofthe decision
List and evaluatealternatives
Deci
sion-M
aki
ng P
roce
ss
Select the bestcourse of action
Gather feedback
Implementthe decision
Follow up
Deci
sion-M
aki
ng P
roce
ss
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Learning Outcome
Describe various models of decision making.
2
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Rationality
a logical, step-by-step approach to decision
making, with a thorough analysis of
alternatives and their consequences
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Models of Decision Making
Effective Decision
a timely decision that meets a desired objective and is acceptable to those individuals affected by it
Bounded Rationality Model
Rational Model
1. The outcome will be completely rational
2. The decision maker uses a consistent system of preferences to choose the best alternative
3. The decision maker is aware of all alternatives
4. The decision maker can calculate the probability of success for each alternative
Rational Model
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Bounded Rationality
a theory that suggests that there are
limits upon how rational a decision
maker can actually be
1. Managers suggest the first satisfactory alternative
Satisfice – to select the first alternative that is “goodenough,” because the costs in time and effort are too great to optimize
Bounded Rationality Model
1. Managers suggest the first satisfactory alternative
2. Managers recognize that their conception of the world is simple
Bounded Rationality Model
3. Managers are comfortable making decisions without determining all the alternatives
4. Managers make decisions by rules of thumb or heuristics
Heuristics – shortcuts in decisionmaking that save mental activity
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Garbage Can Model –
a theory that contends that decisions in organizations are random and unsystematic
Problems
Participants
From M.D. Cohen, J.G. March, and J.P. Olsen in Administrative Science Quarterly 17 (March 1972) 1.25. Reprinted by permission of the Administrative Science Quarterly
Garbage Can Model
Solutions
Choiceopportunities
Beyond the Book:
Z Problem-Solving Model
Look at the facts
and details
Can it beanalyzed
objectively?
What alternativesdo the facts
suggest?
What impactwill it have on
those involved?
Sensing Intuition
Thinking Feeling
Figure from Type Talk at Work by Otto Kroeger and Janet M. Thuesen. Copyright © 1992 by Otto Kroegerand Janet M. Thuesen. Used by permission of Dell Publishing, a division of Random House. Inc.
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Escalation of Commitment
The tendency to continue to commit
resources to a failing course of action
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Escalation of Commitment
• Why it occurs– humans dislike inconsistency– optimism– control– sunk costs
• How to deal with it– split responsibility for decisions– provide individuals with a graceful exit– have groups make the initial decision
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Learning Outcome
Discuss the individual influences that affect decision making.
3
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Cognitive Style
an individual’s preference for gathering
information and evaluating alternatives
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Jung’s Theory
Jungian theory offers a way of
understanding and appreciating
differences among individuals.
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Risk and the Manager
[Risk takers]– accept greater potential for loss– tolerate greater uncertainty– more likely to make risky decisions
Evidence: Successful Managers Take Risks
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Risk Aversion
the tendency to choose options that entail
fewer risks and less uncertainty
Jung’s Cognitive Style
Style
Sensing/thinking
Sensing/feeling
Intuiting/thinking
Intuiting/feeling
Ideal Organization
Facts/ Impersonal Analysis
Facts & Org. Relationships
Broad Issues/ Impersonal & Ideal
Serve Humankind/General Values
ST
SF
NT
NF
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Two Brains, Two Cognitive Styles
Left Hemisphere Right Hemisphere
VerbalSequential, temporal,
digitalLogical, analytic
RationalWestern thought
Nonverbal, visuospatialSimultaneous, spatial,
analogicalGestalt, synthetic
IntuitiveEastern thought
Ideal = “brain-lateralized” making use ofeither or both sides, depending on situation
From Left Brain, Right Brain by Springer and Deutsch © 1989, 1985, 1981 by Sally Springer and Georg Deutsch. Used with permission by W.H. Freeman and Company
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Influences onDecision Making
Intuition – fast, positive force in decision making utilized at a level below consciousness, involves learned patterns of information
Creativity – a process influenced by individual and organizational factors that results in the production of novel and useful ideas, products, or both
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
GPS devices and freely-available online maps are forcing the mapping industry to change how it does business.
Map companies are incorporating digital services into their business model, capitalizing on the benefits of paper maps, expanding into related fields like astronomy and planetary mapping, or simply scaling back their businesses.
Beyond the Book:Mapping Changes in the Industry
Faced with a challenge, map industry professionals are charting a variety of courses--which decisions will succeed?
Four Stages of Creative Process
Verification
thinking,
sharing,
testing the
decision
Illumination
insight into
solving
a problem
Incubation
reflective,
often
unconscious
thought
Preparation experience/opportunity
to build knowledge
base
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Influences on Creativity
• Individual examples– Cognitive Processes
• Divergent Thinking• Associational Abilities• Unconscious
Processes– Personality Factors
• breadth of interests• high energy• self-confidence
• Organizational examples– Flexible organization
structure– Participative decision
making– Quality, supportive
relationships with supervisors
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
CREATIVITY
1324 because it is expected of you
in your job
because you want to be creative
You discover problems
You respond to problems
Expected creativity
Responsive creativity
Proactive creativity
Contributory creativity
4 T
YP
ES
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Subjects in a study were assigned a task requiring creative solutions and allowed varying amounts of sleep throughout the task.
The group that was introduced to the problem, “slept on it,” and returned to the task were twice as likely to discover the creative solution than other groups.
Conclusion: a full night’s sleep facilitates creative problem solving!
Beyond the Book:Eight Hours of Power
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Group Decision Making
• Role of synergy – a positive force that occurs in groups when group members stimulate new solutions to problems through the process of mutual influence and encouragement in the group
• Role of social decision schemes – simple rules used to determine final group decisions
(prediction 80% correct) Majority Wins
Truth Wins
Two-thirds Majority
First-shift
Group Decision Making
1. more knowledge through pooling of group resources
2. increased acceptance and commitment due to voice in decisions
3. greater understanding due to involvement in decision stages
Advantages
1. pressure in groups to conform2. domination by one forceful member
or dominant clique3. amount of time required, because
group is slower than individual to make a decision
Disadvantages
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Group Phenomenon
Groupthink – a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment resulting from in-group pressures
Group Polarization – the tendency for group discussion to produce shifts toward more extreme attitudes among members
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Preventing Groupthink
• Ask each group member to act as critical evaluator
• Have the leader avoid stating his opinion prior to the group decision
• Create several groups to work simultaneously
• Appoint a devil’s advocate• Evaluate the competition carefully• After consensus, encourage rethinking
the position
From Janis, Irving L., Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes, Second Edition. Copyright © 1982 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Self-Managed Teams
DialecticalInquiry
Brainstorming
Devil’s Advocacy
Delphi Technique
Nominal Group Technique
Quality Circles and Quality Teams
GroupDecision
Techniques
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Learning Outcome
Describe the role culture plays in decision making.
5
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Hofstede’s Dimensions• Styles of decision
making vary by culture
• Many of Hofstede’s
dimensions have implication for
how people deploy the decision-
making process
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Technological Aids to Decision Making
Expert Systems – a programmed decision tool set up using decision rules
Decision Support Systems – computer and communication systems that process incoming data and synthesize pertinent information for managers to use
Group Decision Support Systems – systems that use computer software and communication facilities to support group decision-making processes in either face-to-face meetings or dispersed meetings
Beyond the Book:
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Decision Making in the Virtual Workplace
Desktop Videoconferencing
Systems
Internet/IntranetSystems
Tools for
Virtual Teams
Group DecisionSupport Systems
Bey
ond
the
Boo
k
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Learning Outcome
Explain how organizations can improve the quality of decisions through participation.
6
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Participative Decision Making
• Organizational Foundations– Participative, supportive organizational culture– Team-oriented work design
• Individual Prerequisites – Capability to become psychologically involved in participative
activities– Motivation to act autonomously– Capacity to see the relevance of participation for one’s own well-
being
Individuals who are affected by decisions influence the making of those decisions
:
Participative Decision Making
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Beyond the Book:Ethics Check
• Is it legal? – Does it violate law– Does it violate
company policy• Is it balanced?
– Is it fair to all– Does it promote win–win relationships
• How will it make me feel about myself
© 2009 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Your top salesperson Jake was picked up by the police for a DUI on New Year’s Eve and had his car impounded. You later discover Jake didn’t tell you the whole story: his BAC was .20 (over twice the legal limit) and he’s had two other DUIs. Jake can’t make sales appointments until he bails his car out.
How do you decide whether or not to keep Jake on? Is Jake’s performance as number-one salesperson worth the potential risks of continued employment?
Beyond the Book:Decision Making: Your Turn