© 04/16/20011 Logistics Systems Engineering System Cost Analysis, Part II NTU SY-521-N SMU SYS 7340...
-
Upload
garey-arnold -
Category
Documents
-
view
225 -
download
2
Transcript of © 04/16/20011 Logistics Systems Engineering System Cost Analysis, Part II NTU SY-521-N SMU SYS 7340...
© 04/16/2001 1
Logistics Systems EngineeringSystem Cost Analysis, Part II
NTUSY-521-N
SMUSYS 7340
James R. Brennan, Product Assurance Analysts
© 04/16/2001 2
Agenda
• Cost Analysis Principles• Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis• System Considerations• LCC Management
– Design to Cost (DTC)– Cost as an Independent Variable (CAIV)
© 04/16/2001 3
Agenda
• LCC Organization• Warranties/ Guarantees• Wrap-Up
© 04/16/2001 4
Cost Analysis Principles
• Cost Analysis Essentials– Precise definition of what is being cost– Documentation of assumptions and
constraints– Model tailored to needs of problem and
consistent with existing level of system definition
– Risk/Uncertainty analysis to identify any conditions which could affect a conclusion
– Key limitations
© 04/16/2001 5
Cost Analysis Principles
State Objectives
Define Assumptions
Select Cost Element
Develop CERS
Collect Data
Estimate Element Cost
Perform Sensitivity Analysis
Perform Uncertainty Analysis
Present Results
© 04/16/2001 6
Cost Analysis Principles
• Six Desired Characteristics of Cost Models– Consistency: Conforms to current cost
estimating practices. This allows the Proposed System to be compared to an Analogous System.
– Flexibility: Constructed so that it is useful in the early phases and can evolve to accommodate more detailed information as the program continues through its life cycle.
© 04/16/2001 7
Cost Analysis Principles
• Six Desired Characteristics of Cost Models– Simplicity: Requires only the minimum data
necessary to estimate the cost. More complex models can be used as more data becomes available.
– Usefulness: Provides useful information to the decision makers in their evaluation of support and design tradeoffs.
– Completeness: Models should include all applicable costs for a system’s life.
© 04/16/2001 8
Cost Analysis Principles
• Six Desired Characteristics of Cost Models– Validity: Capable of providing logical,
reproducible results.
© 04/16/2001 9
Cost Analysis Principles
• Payback Analysis
Cost
($)
Time - Years
Payback Period
Crossover PointModified System
Existing System
© 04/16/2001 10
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Introduction– LCC a well-traveled concept for over 30 years– Numerous papers, policies, and decisions
issued relative to LCC over these years– Despite its longevity, a universal
understanding of LCC has not been established– A common definition of LCC terms, processes
and applications is required– LCC or a derivative will exist as long as
controlling program costs is a critical consideration
© 04/16/2001 11
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Definitions– Life-Cycle Cost (LCC): Total cost to the
customer of acquisition and ownership of a system over its full life. It includes the cost of development, production, operation and support and disposal.
– Cost Effectiveness (CE): Consideration of mission capability, mission reliability and operational availability along with LCC to evaluate competing design, production or support alternatives
© 04/16/2001 12
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Definitions– Design To Cost (DTC): Cost is a design
parameter receiving consideration along with performance, schedule, etc. In program decisions. DTC is a management process to integrate cost into design, production and support decisions.
© 04/16/2001 13
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Scope of LCC– LCC analysis can be applied on commercial
as well as government programs– Existing programs require LCCA - increasing
frequency is expected– LCC analysis is applicable across all program
phases - development, production and use– LCC analysis is applicable to software as well
as hardware– LCC analysis can be performed in constant,
inflated or discounted dollars
© 04/16/2001 14
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Limitations– LCC outputs are estimates and are only as
accurate as the inputs– Interval estimates (Cost-Risk Analysis) are
appropriate for LCC predicting or gudgeting purposes
– Accuracy of LCC estimates is difficult to determine
– Limited data exists on new programs particularly with respect to operation and support costs
© 04/16/2001 15
Perc
en
tag
e
100
0
Life Cycle Phase
50
LCC Analysis: Phased LCC Funding Trends
FundsCommitted
FundsExpended
Definition RDT&E Production O&S
© 04/16/2001 16
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Cardinal Principles– Not an exact science - highly estimate– No right or wrong - reasonable or
unreasonable– Most effective as a Trade-Off tool– Should employ cost-risk analysis for LCC
estimation– Requires project team approach - need
specialized expertise from the project disciplines
© 04/16/2001 17
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Cardinal Principles– Should be an integral part of the design,
production and support processes - DTLCC
© 04/16/2001 18
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Cost Analysis Estimates– As system definition matures, system-
comparable data replaced by system-specific data
– Systems Engineer should be LCC team leader and coordinate input data from team members:ReliabilityMaintainabilityLogistics
DesignProductionCost
© 04/16/2001 19
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Cost Analysis Estimates– Estimated data is followed by test and
evaluation data which is in turn followed by field data
© 04/16/2001 20
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Basic LCC ModelsLCC = CA + CS
CA: Acquisition CostCS: Sustaining Cost
CA = CD + CICD: Development CostCI: Investing Cost
CS = COS + CRCOS: Operating and Support CostCR: Retirement Cost
© 04/16/2001 21
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Objectives– Estimate Costs– Compare Costs– Balance Cost
Acquisition Cost Sustaining Cost
© 04/16/2001 22
Insert: Typical LCC Model Structure, p 18
© 04/16/2001 23
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis: Flow
Doctrines•Procurement•Operational•Maint./Support
SystemCharacteristics
StandardFactors
InputData
EstimatesCost
Model
Estimateof
LCC
BestEstimateof LCC
Sensitivity Analysis
© 04/16/2001 24
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Estimating Techniques– Analogy/Scaling– Parametrics-LCC as a function of weight for
example– Engineering (Bottom-Up) Analysis– Vendor Data– Field Data
© 04/16/2001 25
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Input Data– System Characteristics
Quantity of item under study in larger system
Item unit costItem MTBF/MTBMItem Weight
© 04/16/2001 26
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Input Data– System Characteristics
Item VolumeItem MTTRQuantity of stock number introduced and
managed support equipment (if applicable) unit cost
© 04/16/2001 27
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Input Data– Standard Factors
Maintenance labor rates at each maintenance level
Shipping ratesCost per stock number for introductionCost per stock number for managementCost per page for technical data
creation/management
© 04/16/2001 28
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Input Data– Standard Factors
Attrition rates for recurring trainingFacility space cost factorsSupport equipment maintenance cost
factor
© 04/16/2001 29
LCC Analysis: Data Paradox
SmallValue
LargeValue
SmallAmount
LargeAmount
Cost DecisionValue
DataAvailabilityV
alu
e o
f C
ost
Deci
sion
Am
ou
nt
of
Availa
ble
Data
© 04/16/2001 30
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Types of LCC Analysis– Baseline: Evaluates LCC for particular system
configuration for given operational and maintenance policies
– Sensitivity: Evaluates the impact on LCC of changes to the input data to identify cost drivers requiring special attention during the program
– Tradeoff: Evaluates alternative approaches to aid in the selection of the preferred option based on LCC, mission capability, availability and mission reliability
© 04/16/2001 31
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Types of LCC Analysis– Tracking: Monitors LCC of System over time
to identify variances from baseline and aid in definition of trade-offs to control total program cost
© 04/16/2001 32
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Sensitivity Analysis– Types of LCC Drivers:
Hardware - LRU/WRA, SRU/SRA, etc.Cost Element - Initial spares, maintenance,
etc.Design Parameter - MTBF, UPC, weight,
LOC, etc.
© 04/16/2001 33
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Sensitivity Analysis– Common LCC Drivers:
System Usage - Hours, miles, cycles, etc.Unit Production Cost (UPC)Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)Mean Time to Repair (MTTR)System QuantityExpected Service Life of System
© 04/16/2001 34
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Applications– Customer
Affordability studies - CAIVSource SelectionDesign Trade Studies - Establishing
reliability and maintainability goals / requirements
Repair Level AnalysisWarranty should cost and cost effectivenss
© 04/16/2001 35
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• LCC Applications– Supplier
Identification of cost drivers for emphasis during program - sensitivity analysis
Comparison of competing design, production and support alternatives - trade-off ranking
LCC Tracking during program - problem isolation
Marketing tool - new and modification programs
Warranty Pricing
© 04/16/2001 36
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Cost Analysis Considerations– Time Value of Money
Constant Dollars: States all costs in terms of constant purchasing power measured at a given time - also known as real dollars
Inflated Dollars: Cost stated in terms of estimated expenditures at the time the money is spent - also known as then-year future or actual dollars
© 04/16/2001 37
Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) Analysis
• Cost Analysis Considerations– Time Value of Money
Discounted Dollars: All costs are referenced to a common point in time based upon the anticipated earning power of money - costs can be in constant or inflated dollars, but the anticipated earning power must be adjusted thusly
© 04/16/2001 38
Insert: Monte Carlo Process, p. 29
© 04/16/2001 39
System Considerations
• Driving System Concepts– Procurement Data
Number of Systems procuredProduction ScheduleInstallation ScheduleDesign to unit production cost (DTUPC)
requirementsFirst destination transportation
requirements
© 04/16/2001 40
System Considerations
• Driving System Concepts– Operational Data
Number of operational sitesQuantity of systems per siteMission schedule - number of missions per
periodMission Profile - mission length, mission
typeGround operation requirementsMission readiness and reliability
requirements
© 04/16/2001 41
System Considerations
• Driving System Concepts– Maintenance/Support Data
Number of levels of maintenanceQuantity of maintenance sites per levelLocation of maintenance sitesNumber of systems supported per siteDescription of maintenance at each levelScheduled/preventive maintenance
requirements
© 04/16/2001 42
System Considerations
• Driving System Concepts– Maintenance/Support Data
Required MTTR at each maintenance levelRequired spares assurance factors and
TATSSupport equipment requirments
© 04/16/2001 43
Product
•Spares•Technical Publications•Training•Support Equipment
•Availability•Sortie Generation Rates•Basing
•Reliability•Maintainability•Supportability•Testability
Operational
Concept
MaintenanceConcept
SupportConcept
•Organization•Requirements•Schedule Maintenance•Unscheduled Maintenance
RMS as Key System Elements
© 04/16/2001 44
System Considerations
• Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Outcomes
A
B
E
C
Effectiveness
LCC
•A is preferable IF E is worth more than C
•A is more effective•B cost less
© 04/16/2001 45
Insert: Cost-Effectiveness Factor Interaction, p. 36
© 04/16/2001 46
Design to Cost (DTC)
• Establishes LCC as a design parameter - not a consequence of design
• Requires establishment of cost goals, monitoring of these goals and tread-off actions to keep the LCC within these goals (budgets)
• Activity focuses on identifying system cost drivers, potential risk areas relative to the drivers and on-going cost/ scheduled/ performance tradeoffs
• Should be early and continuos
© 04/16/2001 47
Design to Cost (DTC): Terms
• Design to unit production cost (DTUPC): Concerned with managing UPC goals- includes recurring and non-recurring production cost
• Design to LCC (DTLCC): Concerned with managing the total LCC of a system, including development, investment, operation and support and retirement- focuses on drivers since out-year costs are difficult to manage
© 04/16/2001 48
Design to Cost (DTC): Terms
• Design to Cost Effectiveness (DTCE): Concerned with managing not only LCC but also other system parameters such as mission reliability, readiness and mission capability
© 04/16/2001 49
Design to Cost (DTC)
• DTLCC Implementation– Keys to Success
Useable LCC modelReasonable input dataExtensive trade-off analyses- LCC not ony
criterionRelating of results to hardware/software
designImplementation of trade-off decisions into
the hardware/software design
© 04/16/2001 50
Design to Cost (DTC)
• DTLCC Implementation– Keys to Success
Challenging the performance requirementsAdhering to hierarchy - equipment, cost
category and design driver
© 04/16/2001 51
Design to Cost (DTC)
• DTLCC– Program trade-off issues
UPC vs. MTBFRedundancy vs. no redundancyBuilt-InTest (BIT) vs. no BITTwo vs. Three-Level maintenanceRepair vs. discardLCC vs. system performanceDifferent sparing assurancesDifferent levels of environmental stress
screening (ESS)
© 04/16/2001 52
Design to Cost (DTC)
• Trade-Off Process
Insert: Trade-Off process, p. 42
© 04/16/2001 53
Design to Cost (DTC)LCC Vs. MTBF
Cost($)
MTBF (Hours)
Total Life Cycle Cost
Operating and Support Cost
Development and Acquisition Cost
© 04/16/2001 54
Scheduled Maintenance Trade Study
1.85
100 120 1408060
1.80
1.75
1.70
1.65
1.60
1.55
1.50
1.45
Unsched
Sched 1000
Sched 800
A
B
Percent of Predicted Baseline - MTBF
LCC
(B
illio
ns)
Scheduled Vs. Unscheduled Maintenance
© 04/16/2001 55
Repair Versus Discard Trade Study
Unit Production Cost (UPC)
Discard
Repair
$600
LCC
Staff-hrs per repair
Repair
Discard
12 Staff-hrs
LCC
© 04/16/2001 56
Cost as an Independent Variable
• What is CAIV?– An acquisition strategy/methodology to
acquire and manage affordable systems– Early, continual and consistent focus on
balancing requirements to the program budget
– Establishment and management of cost targets consistent with the program budget
– Diligent use of trade-off analysis between requirements and cost to maintain performance and cost within targets
© 04/16/2001 57
Cost as an Independent Variable
• What is CAIV?– An extension of DTLCC where cost and
requirements are independent variables not just requirements
© 04/16/2001 58
Cost as an Independent VariableCAIV Vision Team Effort
User
Acquirer Industry
•Define Operational Requirement•Control $•Make Trade Decisions
•Define Capabilities•Make Trade Inputs•Build System
•Mange Contract•Identify Trades
© 04/16/2001 59
Cost as an Independent Variable
Insert: Cost Vs. Capability, p. 49
© 04/16/2001 60
Cost as an Independent Variable
Insert: CAIV Process Flow, p. 50
© 04/16/2001 61
LCC Organization• Team Organization
ProgramManager
SystemsEngineer
Design-Primeand SupportEquip•Electrical•Mechanical•Systems•Software
Manufac-turing
Relia-bility
Maintain-ability
IntegratedLogisticsSupport
(Support-ability)
LCC
© 04/16/2001 62
LCC Organization
• Management of LCC– Engineering Team Member Responsibilities
Manage assigned cost targets for their cost drivers
Define tradeoffs in their respective disciplines
Estimate input data to LCC model for trade-off analyses
Assist in discussion of trade-off results leading to decisions
© 04/16/2001 63
LCC Organization
• Management of LCC– Engineering Team Member Responsibilities
Implement trade-off decisions into hardware/software design
Document trade-off analysis decisions
© 04/16/2001 64
LCC Organization
• Management of LCC– Cost Analyst Team Responsibilities
Understand, modify or develop LCC and trade-off models for use on program
Clearly define input data requirements for team member data estimation
Perform all LCC-related analysesInterpret LCC analysis results to team
members to aid decision making and implementation of decisions
© 04/16/2001 65
LCC Organization
• Management of LCC– Cost Analyst Team Responsibilities
Assume role of catalyst for team by performing baseline analysis and establishing drivers through sensitivity analysis
© 04/16/2001 66
Warranties / Guarantees
• Introduction: Scope of Warranties
Marketing(Getting the Business)
WARRANTIES
Customer Satisfaction(Keeping the Business)
© 04/16/2001 67
Warranties / Guarantees
• Warranties and Quality– The best warranty is one you never have to
use– A warranty you never have to use means a
quality product– A quality product means a satisfied customer– Satisfied customers mean increased sales– Increased sales mean more opportunities to
satisfy customers
© 04/16/2001 68
Warranties / Guarantees
• Warranty Principles– Benefits:
Good marketing tool for suppliersInsurance for customersGood measure of customer satisfaction
– Criteria of Good Warranty:Motivates supplier to impv. Rel. of productProfit opportunity of supplierInsurance for customerWin/win
© 04/16/2001 69
Warranties / Guarantees
• Warranty Principles– Warranty Objectives:
InsuranceAssuranceIncentives
– Warranty Types:Repair-Threshold or failure-freeSystemicPerformance
© 04/16/2001 70
Warranties / Guarantees
• Warranty Principles– Coverage:
Material and Workmanship (Failures)Design & Manufacturing (Defects)Performance (compliance/non-compliance)
– Remedies:Repair/replace-eliminate failure under
M&W coverageRedesign/retrofit-eliminate defect under
D&M coveragePenalties/Incentives under perf. coverage
© 04/16/2001 71
Warranties / Guarantees
• Warranty Principles– Realities of Warranties:
Items under warranty may failWarranties are not freeWarranties are not iron-clad assurance
that all the warranted parameters will be met- no magic
Warranties indicate the level of liability for which the supplier accepts responsibility
RMS are driving issues in the conception, costing, negotiating and implementation of a warrant
© 04/16/2001 72
Warranties / Guarantees
• Warranty Principles– Warranty Process:
RequirementsCosting/pricingNegotiatingCost BenefitImplementation/administration
© 04/16/2001 73
Warranties / Guarantees
• Warranty Principles– Warranty Keys:
Customer satisfaction involves the product quality/reliability and quality service
Warranty is a process not a discipline - it is the amalgamation of several disciplines
We should always strive to design quality/reliability into the product-warranties motivate suppliers to that end
Good reliability wins the bets from both supplier and customer standpoints
© 04/16/2001 74
Wrap-Up
• LCC can be controlled on commercial and government programs through the diligent application of CAIV
• CAIV is a management tool to establish affordability and integrate LCC into the design process
• Tradeoffs are the cornerstone of CAIV• CAIV should be applied as early in the
program design process as possible
© 04/16/2001 75
Wrap-Up
• Team concept is vehicle for a successful CAIV program
• Cost must be a design parameter not a consequence of design
• CAIV is here to stay- the well is drying up