Post on 24-Feb-2016
description
WINCHCOMBE AND SUDELEY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN
ANALYSIS OF QUESTIONNAIRE
RESPONSES
Lucy BriggsUniversity of Gloucestershire
February 2014
Who Responded?
0-19 20-39 40-59 60+ Not Given0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Age of people in Winchcombe & Sudeley who responded
Age Group
Num
ber o
f Res
iden
ts
Who Responded?
Student Employed Self Employed Unemployed Retired Not Given0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Occupation of Winchcombe and Sudeley Respondents
Occupation of Resident
Num
ber o
f Res
iden
ts
Who Responded?
Homeowner Tenant Not Given0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Winchcombe and Sudeley Occupancy
Occupancy Type
Num
ber o
f Res
iden
ts
General Reactions
Agree Disagree No Comment0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Have we captured the challenges facing our town and surrounding coun-tryside?
Num
ber o
f Res
iden
ts
Sites for Economic Development
Sites for Economic Development
No Yes No Comment0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
To provide for business growth and new jobs in town, are there any better sites than those shown on the map?
Num
ber o
f Res
iden
ts
Sites for Economic Development
Popular additional sites suggested:
• Old Winchcombe Hospital
• Conversion of old buildings into new businesses
• Rail Station
• Littleworth
Sites for Retail Development
Sites for Retail Development
North Street Almsbury Farm Library Car Park Castleways Garage Site
Neither No Comment Other - Expand current Co-op store
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
To increase shopping choice, which of the two edge of town centre options would you favour? (including alternative given)
Site Choices
Num
ber o
f Res
iden
ts
Residents Response to an Expanded Co-op
• When the question “To increase shopping choice, which of the two edge of town centre option would you favour? Or do you have any alternatives to add?” a large portion of the responses wrote in that they wanted an expanded Co-op instead of a entirely new store.
• One person commented that they would rather have a larger store within the town that sold a wider range of stock than two smaller shops with less of a range of products.
Propsal for a Supported Housing Development
Proposal for a Supported Housing Development
Yes No No Comment0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
In providing for new homes, are serviced homes for elderly people a priority?
Num
ber o
f Res
iden
ts
Proposal for Supported Housing
Yes No No Comment0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Is the Almsbury Farm site most suitable for new serviced homes?
Num
ber o
f Res
iden
ts
Potential Alternative Housing Location
The map to the left shows the potential housing sites in the area of Winchcombe. The Almsbury site will most likely be allocated to the supported homes for the elderly and the other two sites of the infill in Greet and the West of Winchcombe site.
Potential Alternative Housing Locations
West of Winchcombe
Site
Infill in Greet Site Disagree No Comment Other - Castleway Site
Both Sites0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
For the other new homes needed, which option mapped would best serve Winchcombe and Sudeley?
Site Choices
Num
ber o
f Res
iden
ts
Protecting Winchcombe’s Setting By Designating Green Spaces
Agree Disagree No Comment0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Do you agree with the proposed designation of the local green spaces shown on the map?
Resident Responses
Num
ber o
f Res
iden
ts
Additional Comments
• Improve and maintain public transport
• Affordable housing for younger people
• Address traffic congestion
• Increase educational and medical facilities