Post on 03-Apr-2018
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
1/73
Watch Your Language!
Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students
that Crack the Behavior Code/Book Excerpt
Carmen Y. Reyes
The Psycho-Educational Teacher
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
2/73
License Notes
This book is intended for professional enrichment. You may reproduce this book
only for classroom management purposes. Duplicating this book for commercial
use is not allowed. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.
Copyright 2013 by Carmen Y. Reyes
SolidRock Press
Brooklyn, New York
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
3/73
A Very Special Dedication
I dedicate this book to you, beautiful teacher. We are probably in opposite
corners of the world, but I feel that I know you personally. I share your dreams ofcreating a better world, one child at a time. I know of your disappointment and
self-doubts when things did not go as they were envisioned. I know that you
never quit, no matter how hard things seem to be. Most importantly, I know that
each day that you spend in the classroom is as much a learning experience for you
as it is for your students. My hope is that this humble book inspires and motivates
you the same way that you inspired and motivated me all my life.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
4/73
Table of Contents
Introduction
Redefining Discipline Developing an Action Plan
Part I: The Basics
Chapter One: What is Interpersonal Communication?
Interpersonal Communication Channels Interpersonal Communication Styles Types of Communication Interpersonal Communication in Context Overview
Chapter Two: Interpersonal Communication in the Classroom: Theories and
Principles
The Systems Perspective The Coordinated Management of Meaning Theory (CMM) The Symbolic Interaction Theory The Politeness Theory Principles
OverviewChapter Three: Interpersonal Communication in the Classroom: Components
and Skills
The Receptive Side of Communication: Listening Why We Should Listen to Children Listening Types Bad Listening Behaviors Listening Skills
The Expressive Side of Communication: Speaking Speaking Skills
Overview
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
5/73
Part II: Interpersonal Communication is Everything And Everywhere!
Chapter Four: A Therapeutic Framework of Interpersonal Communication
Assertive Assertive Language Starts with the Teacher
Optimistic Motivational
Important Motivational Constructso Locus of Controlo Attribution Styleo Not All Effort is the Right Effort
Rational Cognitive Distortions
Goal-Oriented Guidelines for Setting Goals Changing Behavior is the Journey- Goal-Oriented Questions to Plan
My Route
Choice Making Problem Solving Solution-Oriented Overview
Chapter Five: On Becoming an Effective Communicator
Our Intention Determines the Meaning of the Communication The Meaning of the Communication is in the Response We Get Connect Before You Direct- The Essence of Effective Communication
The First Column- Rapport The Second Column- Empathy A Brief Note About Time
OverviewChapter Six: The Nonverbal Aspect of Interpersonal Communication
Types of Nonverbal Communication Uses of Nonverbal Communication Putting Our Interpretations in Context Clusters of Nonverbal Behavior Teachers Supportive Body Language- Showing Kids that We Care Aligning Our Verbal and Nonverbal Communication
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
6/73
OverviewChapter Seven: What We Expect is What We Get: The Influential Effect of
Teachers Expectations in Shaping Classroom Behavior
Guidelines for Communicating High Expectations to Children Overview
Part III: Speech Acts
Chapter Eight: The Speech Act- Parts and Uses
Parts of Speech Sentences Special Linguistic Terms
Manipulating the Parts of Speech to Modify Meaning Overview
Chapter Nine: Disciplinary Speech Acts
Short-Term Disciplinary Speech Acts Long-Term Disciplinary Speech Acts
Kinds of Long-Term Disciplinary Speech Actso Feedbacko Constructive Criticism
Kinds of Criticism Guidelines for Criticizing Children
o Praise Guidelines for Praising Children
o Encouragemento Requests or Commands?
When Refusing Is Not an Option: Mastering the Command Guidelines for Giving Alpha Commands
o Correcting Behavior Guidelines for Correcting Behavior
OverviewChapter Ten: Enhanced Disciplinary Language
The Persuasive Speech Act Giving Suggestions to Children Changing Young Hearts and Minds with the Persuasive Message
o Techniques for Changing Young Hearts and Minds
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
7/73
The Persuasive Power of Images- Guided Imagery and Visualizations Why the Question? How to Ask Questions that Change Behavior
Questions to Help the Child Select Goals
Questions to Help the Child Identify Resources Questions to Help the Child Initiate Action Questions to Help the Child Stay in Course Questions to Help the Child Correct Course Questions to Help the Child Measure Progress Questions to Help the Child Cope with Failure Some Special Questions
Mastering Therapeutic Language: How to Turn Negative Behavior intoPositive Problem Solving Enhanced Interventions to Create Rapport with a Difficult Student
o The Synchronization Techniqueo Alternative Approaches to Create Rapporto More Techniques
Child Guidance Speech Acts Interpreting Reflecting Reframing Decoding Challenging Confronting
Child Guidance Guidelines From Analysis to Change: Helping Children in Planning Responsible
Behavior
OverviewAppendix
Appendix A: Visualization Exercise for Children- Enhancing Your Senses Appendix A- Analysis and Techniques
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
8/73
o List of Techniques Appendix B: Visualization Exercise for Children- Test Taking
Appendix B- Analysis and Techniqueso List of Techniques
Bibliography
List of Tables
Table 5.1. Bads and Betters of Effective Communication Table 9.1. Examples of the Three Kinds of Feedback
About the Author
CONNECT WITH THE AUTHOR ONLINE
DISCOVER OTHER TITLES BY THIS AUTHOR
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
9/73
Introduction
Much literature is available relating teachers language (the words we use
and the messages we send) with students behaviors. Commonly, these are books
within the neuro-linguistic programming model or NLP. For example, Nitsche
(2006) discusses neuro-linguistic techniques, focusing in nonverbal classroom
management; Mahony (2003) focuses in NLP language patterns such as meta-
modelor questioning and metaphoric or storytelling. Outside the neuro-linguistic
tradition, the nonviolent communication model, developed by Rosenberg (2003),
is an example of a specific way of talking that aims at improving the classroom
environment by creating a partnership relationship between teacher andstudents. As Hart and Kindle Hodson (2004) stated, in this relationship based
classroom, safety, trust, student needs, teacher needs, and modes of
communication are considerations as important as history, language arts, science,
or other academic subjects (p. 15).
These language and communication approaches are rooted in the belief
that teachers ways of talking play a crucial role in influencing childrens behavior;
our students behaviors strongly reflect both the words we use and how we say
those words to them. In simpler terms, positive and optimistic messages that
communicate high expectations influence positive behavior, and negative and
pessimistic messages with low expectations influence negative behavior. The
nonviolent communication model emphasizes the importance of quality teacher-
student interactions in improving the classroom environment. From the broader
interpersonal communication point of view, better teachers language coupled
with quality teacher-students interactions actually improves childrens behavior.
Based on this fundamental belief, to break a cycle of poor classroom interactions
(e.g. negative teacher-to-students interactions, hostile student-to-student
interactions, disruptiveness, and noncompliance), we need to change the
messages we send to students. In summary, our ways of talking influence the way
we interact with children, and the way we interact with children influences their
behavior. Therefore, to speak and relate with children in a way that promotes
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
10/73
positive classroom behavior, teachers need better interpersonal communication
skills.
Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that
Crack the Behavior Code is a book about how to discipline children using behavior-
influence language. Within the interpersonal communication context, classroom
discipline is not just about finding and using the right techniques; classroom
discipline is about building positive and collaborative teacher-students
interactions and relationships. We start building better classroom relationships
when we communicate to our students from the beginning thatwe will do
everything we need to doto enjoy being with them and teaching them. This leads
us to a new definition of classroom discipline, a definition that is both
interactions-basedand communication-based.
Redefining Discipline
Every teacher faces daily challenges in trying to teach children better ways
of behaving. A few have little difficulty in disciplining children, some get
inconsistent results (i.e. positive behavior some of the time but not all of the time
and/or positive behavior from some students but not from all students), and for
others, keeping the class engaged in the lessons, focused, and well-motivatedfeels difficult to accomplish. If we want to move up from one of the last two
groups to the first group of teachers, a good starting point is to understand what
discipline means to us, because it is from this definition of discipline that both our
behavior management system and discipline style develop. For instance, for
several years, I equated the term discipline with reacting to my students
negative and disruptive behaviors. For example, I felt compelled to reprimand the
two children that were holding a private conversation in the back of the room, or
to say something to the child that was pushing others in the line. It took me years
of mistakes and frustration before I realized that discipline is less about reacting
to the negatives, and more about what I can do to elicit positive behaviors from
my students. When we define discipline as reacting to the negatives, we put
children in charge; they are the ones in the offensive, and the teacher is usually
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
11/73
on the defensive, a well-known recipe for feelings of insecurity and self-doubt
(e.g. Do I have what it takes to do this job?). However, by envisioning discipline
as everything we put into childrenthat influences how theybehave, we shift from
the passive role of simply reacting to childrens behaviors as it is, to a much more
active and focused role of doing everything we can do to encourage and guide
positive behavior. That is, we evolve from demanding childrens compliance to
classroom rules to a child guidance system that encourages and coaches children
in change and in personal growth. Or, as Nitsche (2006) says, we transition from
the sphere of domination and power to the sphere of influence, a very much-
needed step in becoming an effective behavior manager.
Developing an Action PlanOnce we complete the step of redefining discipline, the second step is to
develop an action plan. This is a question-and-answer process where we explore
the answers to six basic questions:
1. How do I want my class to turn out? Alternatively, what is my goal for thisclass?
2. What my class will need from me to become the class I want them/expectthem to be? Alternatively, how can I encourage my class to become the
class I want them/expect them to be?
3. What interpersonal skills my class needs to learn?4. How can we (teacher with class) do it?5. What resources do I have?
a. internal resourcesb. external resources
6. What resources does my class have?a. personal strengthsb. current interpersonal skills
Alternatively, for a specific child, we ask:
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
12/73
1. How do I want this child to turn out? Alternatively, what is my goal for thischild?
2. What this child will need from me to become everything positive that thischild can be? Alternatively, how can I encourage this child to become
everything positive that this child can be?
3. What interpersonal skills this child needs to learn?4. How can we (teacher with child) do it?5. What resources do I have?
a. internal resourcesb. external resources
6. What resources does this child have?a. personal strengthsb. current interpersonal skills
In question one, we state our main goal. The second question expands our
role (our own behavior) to both an active and a motivational role. With the third
question, we identify our objectives, or the specific interpersonal skills that we
are going to teach. The planning process (how to) starts with the fourth question;
this is where we identify the order of steps or a procedure. Questions five and sixare all about resources available and personal strengths, both the teachers
personal strengths (question five) and childrens personal strengths (sixth
question).
To be effective in encouraging and motivating children for better behavior,
we need to make them aware that they already have the personal resources they
need to self-regulate behavior; our main role is to help children notice and
strengthen those resources. In the process of behavior change, the teacher, like a
sports coach, guides the child or class in how to use those precious personal
resources to develop the behavioral self-control needed to become successful,
not only in school, but also in life. Discipline then, should never be about short-
term solutions using 5-minute techniques. Discipline needs to be our long-term
goal, where we help children develop the self-direction they need to be in control
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
13/73
of their present and future behavior using constructive rules and high standards
that they have internalized.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
14/73
PART I
THE BASICS
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
15/73
Chapter One
What is Interpersonal Communication?
Interpersonal communication is the process of sharing thoughts, feelings,
and information with one another. The two elements in interpersonal
communication are message sending and message reception. The process of
interpersonal communication begins at the thoughts and/or feelings level, that is,
an individual (the sender) gets a thought or a feeling, converts this thought or
feeling into a message, and then sends the message using a communication
channel ( oral, written, or visual). The person receiving the message (the receiver)
responds to it and sends a response back via the same or using a different
communication channel. Interpersonal communication is more than a superficial
exchange ofhellos. The process of interpersonal communication refers to both
the contentand the qualityof messages, and how we can develop and/or
strengthen relationships from these messages.
Interpersonal communication can take place with and without words; for
example, even when the receiver responds with silence and/or withdrawing, his
or her body language gives information to the sender. Similarly, a single gesturecan communicate a particular thought or a feeling. Like all skills, with knowledge,
practice, and feedback, we can learn and/or improve our interpersonal
communication skills.
Interpersonal Communication Channels
In interpersonal communication, the three main channels of
communication are:
1. The oral channel, whichrefers to the spoken words in thecommunication process. For example, speaking face-to-face
interactions or on the phone.
2. The written channel, for example, letters, emails, or texting.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
16/73
3. The visual channel, for example, body language, sign language, andpictures.
Based on the channel used, we can classify the process of communication
into verbal communication and nonverbal communication. To communicate
verbally (with words), we can use the oral and/or written channel. In nonverbal
communication, we use body language (i.e. facial expression, body posture, and
body movements), gestures, and pictorial representations such as pictures,
paintings, signboards, sketches, and diagrams.
Interpersonal Communication Styles
Bateman and Zeithaml (As cited on Sethi and Seth, 2009) originallyintroduced the following styles of interpersonal communication:
The controlling style. In a controlling style of interpersonal communication,the person sending the message leaves little or no room for the person
receiving the message to respond to the message and/or to give feedback.
This is the my way or no way style. The controlling style is common in
senior-to-subordinate interactions, and, mostly intended to intimidate the
receiver, creates a communication gap or inequality between the two parts.
The structuring style. In the structuring style, the purpose of thecommunication is to coordinate and organize ideas, and to communicate
specific goals. Most classroom lessons and lectures follow this style. If we
are not careful, the structuring style can turn into a one-way conversation
with no feedback from the audience (students).
The egalitarian style. In the egalitarian style, the participants share theinformation mutually. In this style of communication, all participants are
encouraged to express their ideas, creating a cooperative atmosphere.
The dynamic style. In the dynamic style, we use motivating words andphrases to encourage the receiver to get inspired and to achieve specific
goals. Although this is the communication style that we use to motivate and
engage children in changing behavior, students are not going to be able to
change their behavior if they lack the skills required, or if they do not have
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
17/73
enough knowledge and information about the actions that we are requiring
from them. In other words, to change behavior, motivation alone is not
going to do the trick, only motivation with skills change behavior.
The relinquishing style. In this style, we may be so open to the ideas of theother person, that we transfer the responsibility for the conversation to the
other person. This style of communication works best when both sender
and receiver are equally interested in the conversation, share common
goals, and have equivalent skills.
The withdrawal style. We can describe this style as a failure incommunicating, or a lack of communication. In this style, at least one of the
participants shows total disinterest in participating in the conversation, or
in carrying the conversation forward.
Types of Communication
Depending on style and intention (purpose), communication can beformal
or informal. The official communication that takes place in the business world (i.e.
conferences, meetings, and memos) is one example of formal communication; a
second example is an interchange taking place between two strangers interacting
for the first time. Formal communication is more precise and rigid than informal
communication. On the other hand, informal communication includes those
instances where the communication between people is more free and
unrestrained, with no limiting rules or guidelines, for example, friends or family
members. In informal communication, there are no boundaries of time, place, or
even topics. To summarize, formal communication is confined mainly to the
workplace; informal communication is part of our personal lives.
Interpersonal Communication in Context
No communication happens in a vacuum; there are always conditions
preceding the message, and conditions surrounding the message. These
conditions, or context, can be in the form of present or past events, including
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
18/73
personal history; that is, how each individual is, and what each individual brings to
the communication. In addition, the context can be:
Thephysical environment, that is, factors external to the participants(physical space), including things like the size of the room, furniture,
noise level, and temperature.
The social environment, for example, teachers, other students,friends, and family.
The participantspsychologicalor emotional state. The participantsinteractions or individual reactions. The setting (place and time), for example, classroom, lunchroom,
principals office, schoolyard, and time of day. The psychological setting or scene, including characteristics such as
range of formality and sense of play or seriousness.
The cultural environmentor learned behaviors and social rules. The situation, that is, the participants cognitive or mental
representations (thoughts) of the environment, or how theyperceive
the environment.
Our particular day-to-day verbal exchanges with our students take place ina verbal context, which are the sentences and body attitude (body language)
before and after the message and the way we deliver that message (e.g. our tone
of voice). All these conditions in interaction are instrumental in giving meaning to
a message; in other words, context influences the way that children understand
and interpret our messages.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
19/73
Overview
1. Interpersonal communication is the process of sharing thoughts,feelings, and information with one another. At the core of this process
are the two elements ofmessage sending and message reception;however, interpersonal communication goes beyond a superficial
exchange of hellos, referring to both the contentand the qualityof the
message, and how we can develop and/or strengthen relationships from
the messages we share.
2. Interpersonal communication can take place with or without words.Even silence and withdrawing body language have meaning, and they
communicate that meaning.
3. There are six interpersonal communication styles: controlling,structuring, egalitarian, dynamic, relinquishing, and withdrawal. The
controlling style is an unequal interaction where the speaker does not
allow the listener to respond to the message or to give feedback.
Common in the school setting is the dynamic style, or motivating words
and phrases that teachers use to inspire children and to help them
achieve their academic goals.
4. No communication happens in a vacuum. There are always conditionspreceding the message and conditions surrounding the message. These
conditions or contextcan be in the form of present or past events,
including each individualspersonal history; that is, how each participant
is and what each participant brings to the interaction. Context
influences the way the participants understand and interpret the
message.
5. Like all skills, with knowledge, practice, and feedback teachers, as wellas their students, can develop and/or improve their interpersonal
communication competence.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
20/73
Chapter Two
Interpersonal Communication in the Classroom:
Theories and Principles
In the broader context, interpersonal communication theories explain how
personal and/or social relationships start, develop, and end. Some interpersonal
communication theories elaborate on how people maintain a social or a personal
relationship over time, while other theories focus on why some individuals relate
to others the way they do, and what to do when handling an individual that is
interacting (behaving) in unexpected ways. The consensus among these theories
is that we define, initiate, maintain, deepen, or even terminate a relationship
based on the quality of our communication. Simply put, the way we communicate
with others has a role in influencing our social interactions, relationships, and
behavior. In applying this broader principle to the school setting, we explore four
interpersonal communication theories that help us put in perspective how
teachers can use interpersonal communication, or the day-to-day exchange of
messages taking place in the classroom to build positive and constructive teacher-
to-students interactions and relationships.
The Systems Perspective
The systems perspective analyzes the kinds of communication taking place
on groups of interacting individuals, from a small group to organizations. The
systems perspective is not just one theory, but a group of theories sharing a
common interactional view of relationships maintenance, in particular, theinterdependence that develops whenever two or more individuals interact. The
system is any group of individuals interrelating to form a whole, for example, the
family, a sports team, co-workers, or the classroom. Any time that a particular
group of people has repeated interactions with each other, that group represents
a system. Systems are part of a hierarchy, with smaller systems existing within
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
21/73
bigger systems, and parallel systems co-existing. The subsystem is a smaller part
of the group as a whole, for example, the students in PS 164. Thesuprasystem is
the larger system, in our example, students with staff.Due to its hierarchical
nature, PS 164 is a smaller system (subsystem) of District 12, and students in PS
164 are a suprasystem of class 508. In addition, classes 501, 502, 503, and so on,
are equivalent systems of class 508.
From systems theory we get the nonsummativity principle, that is, the
whole is greater than the sum of its parts. From a systems perspective, single
members in and on themselves do not make or break the system; only the system
as a whole and working together is able to create what individual members
working in isolation will never be able to accomplish. The belief that systems have
the ability to achieve more through group effort than through individual effort iswhat we know in system theory aspositive synergy. Using systemic language,
when all students in class 508 achieve, including students with disabilities, the
class has positive synergy. On the other hand, if the group or system achieves less
than its individual members, that is, some students achieving, but not all
students, then class 508 is on negative synergy. General systems theorists also
believe in the interdependence principle, that is, each member of the group
depending on every other member of the group. Based on the interdependence
principle, if one member in the group drops the ball (stops working toward thegroups goal), the group as a whole is unlikely to achieve its goals. Another
important principle in systems theory is the principle ofhomeostasis, a biological
self-regulation concept introduced by W. R. Ashby in the 1960s. Homeostasis
references the natural balance or equilibrium within groups. All groups have the
tendency to maintain stability in the face of change, and this homeostasis or
stability can be positive (functional) or negative (dysfunctional). According to the
homeostasis principle, a system free of conflict (e.g. class 508) is likely to continue
to be free of conflict, but a classroom with great deal of conflict (e.g. class 502) is
likely to remainin conflict. The homeostasis principle states that, in class 502, any
effort to reduce conflict will probably create more conflict, because conflict is the
natural balance (homeostasis) for class 502. From vonBertalanffy, an Austrian-
born biologist known as one of the founders of general systems theory, we get
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
22/73
the important principle ofequifinality, or the idea that the system or group has
multiple ways of achieving the same goal. In other words, to achieve a particular
goal, the group can take different paths. In addition, when the group focuses and
establishes priorities, it can work on multiple goals simultaneously. In summary,
systems perspective theories try to explain the patterns of communication that
groups like classes 508 and 502 develop to sustain homeostasis and to achieve
groups goals. Today, general systems concepts that explain the properties of
systems are central in organizational management theory and in cybernetics
theory (Littlejohn, 2011).
The Coordinated Management of Meaning Theory (CMM)
Coordinated management of meaning, a collection of ideas put together to
try to explain how people interact during the communication process, became
popular in the 1980s. The main premise in this theory is that communication is
about meanings, not only in the passive way of perceiving a message, but in the
active way ofcreating the meaning of the message. Creating the meaning of the
communication is not something that one participant does in isolation; all
participants are creating meaning simultaneously and in coordination with all the
other participants in the interaction. Expanding authors Pearce and Cronenoriginal definition, effectivecommunication is a two-sided process of (1)
coordinating actions with one another and (2) making and managing meanings
together(See Griffin, 2011). According to this theory, creating meaning is a
mutual responsibility; both sender and receiver create the meaning of the
interaction, and should share equal responsibility in doing so. In addition,
depending on the specific situation and context, the meaning we create and/or
understand can change, which is theprinciple of having multiple truths. When
there are arguments and/or disagreements between sender and receiver (e.g.between a teacher and a specific student) is mainly because they are not sharing
one same meaning, and, with different meanings in conflict, the intended
message loses clarity, coordination, and coherence. To be able to communicate
more effectively, so that we get a better outcome, we need to know how we can
create a new and shared meaning while we are exchanging our individual ideas.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
23/73
CMM theory emphasizes the importance of experiences, beliefs, and values
in deciding which meaning and interpretation are most important in the stories
we tell; that is, our experiences, beliefs, and values have a crucial role in how our
interactions will play out ultimately. The coordinated management of meaning
theory relies in three key concepts:
1. Coherence. In this process, both the constitutive rules (rules of meaning)and our expectations for the communication help explain how the message
gets its meaning. Our internalized rules and expectations help us make
sense of what is happening in the interaction. Each story we tell holds a
different interpretation depending on six main factors:
A. Content, that is, the information that we exchange (speak) during theinteraction. In creating meaning, content alone is not enough; ourtone of voice and body language are often more informative than
what we say.
B. Episode or situation, that is, the specific rules and routines for eachinteraction (the specific things we do). The same words (the things
we say or the content) can take a different meaning when the
situation is different, for example, the phrase, You are so funny!
has one meaning when we are sharing jokes with friends and a
different meaning when we say it to the classrooms joker that just
interrupted our lesson for the third time.
C. Speech acts or the kinds of language we use. For example, requests,commands, statements, questions, criticism, compliments,
reprimands, threats, or promises.
D. Relationships between the individuals in the interaction, morespecifically, the dynamics of what connects the participants. For
example, two participants that like each other (in rapport), two
participants indifferent to each other (neutral rapport), or two
participants hostile to each other (without rapport). The stories we
tell to people we like and trust (in rapport) are different from those
stories we tell to individuals we do not like and/or do not trust.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
24/73
Similarly, the same story told in rapport may change meaning when
there is no rapport between the participants.
E. Self-concept, which relates to how each participant perceives himselfor herself. The coordinated management of meaning theory states
that we create our self-concept through those stories about us we are
constantly telling others; personal stories that, in turn, give us
guidelines or scripts for our behavior. By evolving into behavior
scripts or behavior patterns, our personal stories influence our
behavior. This takes us to a premise common to most theories in
interpersonal communication: self-concept influences behavior.For
instance, because our classrooms joker perceives himself as a funny
guy, he makes jokes and acts funny; the way our classrooms jokerbehaves explicitly telling the personal story of who he believes he is
or his self-concept.Particularly relevant to the coordinated
management of meaning theory is that self-concept changes and
develops through different personal stories(e.g. Im funny, Im
stubborn,I have a potty mouth,and Im good with numbers)
and, by telling and retelling (acting) these personal stories; for
example, by being funny and using foul language, children like our
classrooms joker shape their self into a self-picture or a self-image ofwhat they believe to be true. Also relevant to this theory is that a
childs self-concept or self-image is strongly influenced by those
specific stories he or she hears from significant others such as
teachers, parents, and peers (e.g. You are a funny guy!Why are
you so stubborn?or You have such a potty mouth!). There is a
strong therapeutic value in explaining behavior as an open and
modifiable scriptto our habitually disruptive students, helping
children reviewold behavior scripts or blueprints so that they can
rewrite a new and improved script that is open to new possibilities or
new behaviors. When we have to deal with children with recurrent
behavior problems, a therapeutic intervention would be to help them
understand that a behavior scriptis never completely and
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
25/73
permanently written (closed script), quite the contrary, childrens
behavior scripts are changing and evolving throughout their lifetime
(open script), and children can always write a much better story for
themselves.
F. Culture, that is, the set of rules for acting and speaking thatdetermines what we define as normal in a given episode or a given
situation. There are different rules of interaction depending on each
participants culture.
2. Coordination. The words we say and the things we do during ourinteractions come together to producepatterns, or the stories we live. Each
individual has a specific set of rules that shapes his or her behavior. We all
operate from our own set of rules, but we can coordinate our personal orspecific rules to coincide with the specific rules of others. Regulative rules
guide our actions (how we respond and behave), and aid in coordination.
The process of coordination refers specifically to the fact that, although we
all have different beliefs, values, ideas, etc., that does not mean that we
cannot reach consensus, and an outcome that benefits us all. We can even
create new rules of meaning (constitutive rules) or action (regulative rules)
to facilitate a successful coordination. Coordination requiresperspective
taking, or being sensitive and mindful of the other side of the story. Finally,
it is important that we keep in mind that different rules produce different
patterns of communication and different outcomes; therefore, if we want
to get better results, we need to apply different rules.
3. Mystery. We cannot explain everything that happens in the communicativeexchange. This is the concept of mystery, or stories unexpressed. Our
human experience is more than any individual story told or lived. Mystery
has to do with the sense of awe or wonder that we experience when thecommunication leads to an unexpected outcome. Together, the processes
ofcoherence, coordination, and mysterycreate the basis for our social
interactions. Coherence gives context to the stories we tell, coordination
comes through the stories we live, and mystery is the sense of wonder for
stories unexpressed. Wrapping up, CMM theory sees human interactions as
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
26/73
a complex series of interconnected events in which each participant is at
the same time influencing and being influenced by the other participants.
Advocates of this theory believe that the best way of improving the
outcomes of our social interactions is by improving the patterns of
communication that produce these outcomes.
The Symbolic Interaction Theory
We live in a symbolic world as well as in a physical world; symbols (i.e.
words, gestures, and social roles) give meaning and define our world. We share
our symbols through human interaction; therefore, interactions give us meaning.
Developed by Herbert Blumer (See Griffin, 2011), this school of thought holds the
principle ofmeaning as central in understanding human behavior. The three core
principles of this theory are:
1. Meaning, that is, the purpose or significance attributed to peopleand things. Meaning is neither inherent in objects nor fixed; each
time we interact with other people or the environment, we create
and/or modify meaning. In other words, meaning evolves from
interactions.
2. Language. Language, a set of shared meanings, is the way by whichwe negotiate meaning through symbols.
3. Thought. Thought modifies each individuals interpretationofsymbols. Based on language, thought is a mental conversation or
dialogue that requires role taking, orperspective taking; that is, the
ability to imagine different points of view.
In summary, through symbolic interactions, we interpret and give meaning
to our world. At the same time, we act toward people and events based on thesymbolic meanings (existing symbols) already attached to those people or events.
That is, our internalized symbols filter our perception of the event and shape our
behavior. For instance, think about the kind of teacher-student relationship that
can develop from symbolic meanings such as:
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
27/73
The teacher defines the child as slow, noncompliant, pain in thebutt, and obnoxious.
The child defines the teacher as unfair, boring, yells too much, andhas a bad hair day every day.
Because both teacher and childs behaviors are in response of their pre-
existing meanings; and remember, children are defining us too, we can anticipate
conflict between teacher and student. In agreement with the previous school of
thought (CMM), advocates of symbolic interaction theory propose that children
develop their concept of self, or self-concept, through the processes of interacting
and communicating with significant others (i.e. parents, caretakers, teachers, and
peers), most specifically, the way significant others react to their behaviors and
how children perceive and interpret those reactions. Simply put, throughinteractions with significant others children are learning about themselves. Self-
concept, once is developed, provides an important motive for the childs
behavior. Again and again, we witness how different but related theories in
interpersonal communication embrace the same belief that self-concept
influences behavior. In addition, once the teacher defines the student as slow and
noncompliant, these preconceptions and labels become reality for the child. The
teachers symbolic meanings almost invariably elicit in the child the same
behaviors that the teacher wants to extinguish in the first place. The two familiar
notions ofteachersexpectations (teachers expectations influence students
performance, perceptions, and attitudes) and self-fulfilling prophesy(the
tendency for our expectations to evoke responses in children that confirm what
we originally anticipated) are rooted in principles of symbolic interactions.
Finally, because teachers are managers of behavior, it is important that we
understand human behavior. According to the symbolic interaction theory,
individuals have different meanings for the same symbols (i.e. for one same eventor situation). Our experiences and memories are linked to our internalized
symbols, and the same symbol that evokes a positive reaction and pleasant
memory in one person can evoke a negative reaction and painful memory in a
second individual. For example, the 25th
of April may signify the birth of her
firstborn for one individual while evoking painful memories of a car accident in a
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
28/73
second individual. Different meanings for the same symbol easily lead to
communication problems ormiscommunication. When a clear understanding of
the situation is lost due to different definitions, perceptions, interpretations,
and/or opinions of the same symbol or event, we start relying on assumptions
and pre-conceptions, putting more emphasis in defending our individual opinions
or pre-conceptions than in reaching consensus and agreement. Teachers
understanding of childrens behavior, that is, why children behave the way they
do, improves when the teacher is aware of the meaning of the symbol (behavior
or event)forthe child. When the teacher and the student have a mutual
understanding of the meaning of the symbol, they can communicate and interact
more effectively. Applying this notion to managing disruptive classroom behavior,
the goal of our interactions with the disruptive child is to create a shared
meaning. For instance, first, teacher and joker share their individual
interpretation of the symbol(the definition of the event, for example, the child
perceives and defines the situation as funny but the teacher perceives and defines
the situation as annoying). Secondly, teacher and student reach an agreement
that works for both of them. For example, the teacher allows the student to
introduce the lesson with a joke. In return, the child refrains from blurting out
jokes while the teacher is delivering the lesson. By taking into considerationthe
childs interpretation of the situation and with symbol manipulation (using thechilds symbol to motivate him to action), the teacher manages the students
behavior. Not only that, but, because symbols are flexible and evolve from
interactions, this interpersonal communication approach modifiesthe childs
original perception of the teacher from always unfair to sometimes fair,
helping the child to be more receptive to the teachers guidance and re-direction.
The Politeness TheoryThe Politeness Theoryapplies concepts from both schools of thought,
Identity Managementand Symbolic Interaction. From the first perspective
(Identity Management), we get an analysis about how individuals establish,
develop, and maintain their identities (faces) during interactions. The concept of
face, or the self-image that each individual wants to present to others, is central
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
29/73
to both schools of thought. The main assumption here is that we are all
concerned with maintaining face (See Holtgraves, 2002). The Politeness Theory
explains how an individual tries to promote, protect, or save face especially
when dealing with an embarrassing or a shameful event. The notion of face has
two dimensions:
1. Positive Face, or our wish to be liked, appreciated, and admired bythose individuals that are important to us; for that reason, we
behave in ways that will ensure their approval.
2. Negative Face or our wish to act freely, without constraints orlimitations from others.
When we can achieve only one face at the expense of the other face, our
face needs are in conflict. Likewise, while interacting with others, our face needs
may be in conflict. For example, during a teacher-student exchange, when the
teacher is wearing the positive face and the student is wearing the negative face,
the interaction can deteriorate into conflict. When the teacher acknowledges and
is sensitive to the students specific face needs, the teacher will be more effective
in balancing his/her own positive and negative faces. Even when our face needs
are not in opposition, the interaction can still be conflictive, for example, when
both the teacher and the child are wearing the negative face. Using the notion of
face needs, we can teach our habitually disruptive and anger-prone students how
to reach a balance between getting others attention and approval (positive face)
while developing independence and self-sufficiency (negative face).
According to the Politeness Theory, interactions like apologies,
compliments, criticism, requests, commands, and threats areface-threatening
acts or FTAs(See Holtgraves, 2002; Goldsmith on Baxter and Braithwaite, 2008;
and Griffin, 2011). To preserve face, that is, to minimize a FTA, we can use specific
strategies (messages) known asfacework(Goffman as seen on Holtgraves, 2002).Preventive facework(Metts and Cupach on Baxter and Braithwaite, 2008) includes
those communication strategies that we use to help ourselves or the student
averts a FTA (before the embarrassing act). Some examples are:
Avoiding the topic
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
30/73
Changing the topic Pretending we did not notice
Corrective facework(Metts and Cupach on Baxter and Braithwaite, 2008)
are the messages we send to help restore face, both our own and the childs face.For example, after an embarrassing event, we can use corrective strategies such
as:
Humor Avoiding the topic Apologizing An account or an explanation of the behavior that caused
embarrassment
When we are interacting in a way that threatens the students face needs,
we can choose among one of five suprastrategies. Credited to Brown and
Levinson (Holtgraves, 2002), these suprastrategies rank from most polite and
least direct to least polite and most direct:
1.Avoidance. When we avoid talking with the student about the issue, we arechoosing not to communicate in a way that could embarrass the student, or
could make the child lose face.2. Going off record. With this strategy, we are hinting or mentioning the face-
threatening topic in a less direct way. Hints and suggestions areopen
messages that the student can pick up (or not). The student can interpret
our suggestion in different ways, which minimizes any face threat. An
indirect way of talking about the face-threatening topic would be, It is sad
that the walls were covered with graffiti. I hope the child who did this is not
afraid to come forward and faces the consequences of his actions.
3. Negative politeness. Here, we recognize the students negative face needs,that is, we recognize the childs need for freedom and lack of restrain. We
are also acknowledging that our request inhibits the childs independence
and we apologize for making such request. For example, Ricky, I feel sorry
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
31/73
about the whole situation, and I dont like asking you about this, but I really
need your help. Do you know who covered the walls with graffiti?
4. Positive politeness. Using positive politeness, we appeal to the childspositive face, that is, the child wants others to like and approve of him or
her. The face-threatening message is hidden beneath praise and
compliments. For example, Ricky, you always say the truth, and the other
kids admire you and follow your lead. I feel that I can count on you on this.
Would you help me find who covered the walls with graffiti?
5. Bald on record. This is the most direct and least polite of the fivesuprastrategies. Now, we are not attempting to protect the students face,
and simply deliver the face-threatening message (e.g. making a demand to
the child). For example, Ricky, you covered the walls with graffiti, didntyou?
Principles
In the classroom, interpersonal communication is a language-based
disciplinary approach that gives teachers communicative skills that change
teachersresponses to students behaviors, as well as communicative skills that
change the behaviors of students. Teachers skilled in interpersonal
communication are able to discipline children through supportive and
constructive language. We base our face-to-face interactions with children on the
premise that all children want to do the rightthing, so itis up to the teacher to
guide them. The teacher and/or staff member offers encouragement, guidance,
and coaching that showchildren the way. Important interpersonal
communicationprinciples that we follow are:
The language a teacher uses defines the teacher, for example,Mr. Randallis strict but fair and My teacher is friendly and she cares for me.
The language a teacher uses defines the students, for example,cooperative, lazy, visual learner, sneaky, and dyslexic.
Positive labels such as polite, creative, insightful, leader, and motivatedpositively influence how teachers communicate and relate with children.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
32/73
Negative labels such as follower, messy-sloppy, troublemaker, oppositional,and emotionally troubled negatively influence how teachers communicate
and relate with children.
When the teacher changes his definitions and descriptions of the student(labels), he changes his perception of the child.
When the teacher changes his perception of the child, he changes the wayhe communicates and relates with the child.
When we tell a student to do something and the child refuses, it is helpfulto think about whether the way we are telling the child to do things
promotes noncompliance.
The teacher that is able to adjust and modify her messages according to theindividual child and the particular situation will get better compliance than
the teacher that always uses static language such as right/wrong and
good/bad.
Once teachers realize that, the way we talk (our messages), influenceschildrensbehavior, we can reduce and even eliminate disruptive classroom
behavior. Negative messages trigger negative behavior, and positive
messages trigger positive behavior. By approaching classroom situations
differently, that is, changing our messages and expectations from negativeto positive, teachers can change the behavior of students and improve the
overall classroom atmosphere.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
33/73
Overview
1. Interpersonal communication theories explain how personal and/orsocial relationships start, develop, and end. Some interpersonal
communication theories explain how to maintain a social or a personalrelationship; other theories focus on why some individuals relate to
others the way they do. The consensus among these theories is that we
define, initiate, maintain, deepen, or even terminate relationships based
on the quality of our communications. Simply put, the way we
communicate has a role in influencing our social interactions, relations,
and behaviors. In applying this broader principle to the school setting,
we explore how teachers can use interpersonal communication theory
and principles to build positive and constructive teacher-studentsinteractions and relationships.
2. Systems Perspective is a group of theories sharing an interactional viewof relationships maintenance. From this group of interpersonal
communication theories, we get the nonsummativity principle, or the
idea that the whole is greater than the sum of its parts. When some
students, but not all students, in the classroom achieve that class is on
negative synergy. To createpositive synergy, all students in the
classroom must achieve, including children with a history of school
failure. Only the system (class) as a whole and working together can
create positive synergy, something that individual members (individual
students) in isolation cannot accomplish. Another important concept in
systems perspective theory is homeostasis, or the tendency to maintain
stability in face of changes. A classroom in conflict, or in negative
homeostasis, is likely to remain in conflict, and any effort to reduce it
may feed the conflict because conflict is the natural balance or
homeostasis for that classroom.
3. The Coordinated Management of Meaning Theory(CMM) is a collectionof ideas put together to explain interactions during the communication
process. The main premise is that communication is about meanings,
not only in the passive way of perceiving the message, but in the active
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
34/73
way of creating the meaning of the message. Creating meaning is not
done in isolation; all participants create meaning simultaneously and in
coordination. In other words, each participant is at the same time
influencing and being influenced by all the other participants in the
interaction. When participants do not share one same meaning, the
message loses clarity, coordination, and coherence sometimes even
deteriorating into arguments and disagreements. The three core
concepts in the coordinated management of meaning theory are (1)
coherence or the stories we tell, (2) coordination or the stories we live,
and (3) mysteryor stories unexpressed.
4. According to the coordinated management of meaning theory, wecreate our self-conceptthrough the stories we tell; these stories are
guides or scripts for our behavior. By telling and retelling a particular
story, we can shape self into whatever picture or self-image we want it
to be.
5. The Symbolic Interaction Theorystates that we live in a symbolic worldas well as in a physical world. Symbols like words, gestures, and social
rules help us understand (give meaning) and define our environment.
We share symbols through human interactions, therefore, interactions
give us meaning.6. The three main concepts in the symbolic interaction theory are: (1)
meaning or the purpose and significance that we attribute to other
people and things, (2) language or a set of shared meanings, and (3)
thought, which modifies our interpretation of the symbols. The concept
of meaning is central in understanding human behavior. Meaning is not
fixed; when we interact, we create and/or modify meaning. In other
words, right from the start, we get meaning when we share symbols
which each other, and this original meaning continues evolving as wecontinue interacting.
7. We act toward people and events based on symbolic meanings, that is,based on existing symbols already attached to those people or events.
Our internalized symbols filter our perception of the event and shape
our behavior.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
35/73
8. Children develop their self-concept through the process of interactingand communicating with significant others like parents and teachers. In
particular, the way significant others react to childrens behaviors and
how children perceive and interpret those reactions. The concepts of
teachers expectations and self-fulfilling prophesyare rooted in
principles of symbolic interactions.
9. The concept offaces, or the self-image that individuals want to presentto others, is central in several interpersonal communication theories,
among them, the Politeness Theory. The main assumption here is that
we are all concerned with maintaining face. The politeness theory
explains how an individual tries to promote, protect, or save face
especially when dealing with embarrassing or shameful events. The
concept of face has two dimensions, thepositive face, that is, our wish
to be liked, appreciated, and admired by those individuals important to
us, and the negative face, or our wish to act freely, without constrains or
limitations. Our positive and negative faces may be in conflict.
10.Using the notion offace needs, we can teach disruptive students how toreach a balance between getting others attention and approval
(positive face) while developing independence and self-sufficiency
(negative face).11.According to the politeness theory, speech acts like apologies,
compliments, criticism, commands, and threats are FTAs orface-
threatening acts. To help children preserve face, teachers can apply
specific strategies known asfacework, which can be eitherpreventive
facework(before the embarrassing event) or corrective facework(after
the embarrassing event). In addition, when a message threatens the
childs face, teachers can apply one of five suprastrategies, ranging from
most polite to least polite.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
36/73
Chapter Three
Interpersonal Communication in the Classroom:
Components and Skills
The central part in this discipline system is how we talk with children.
Talking with children involves both a receptive component, or listening, and an
expressive component or speaking. We elaborate on each specific component
next.
The Receptive Side of Communication: Listening
Why We Should Listen to Children
Open and honest communication starts with effective listening. In the
classroom, constructive behavior propagates from the teachers ability to listen.
We can get a lot of the classroom discipline done just by knowing how to listen to
childrens concerns, apprehensions, and feelings. By listening, we show respect,
communicating to the child, You are important to me. I respect you and I want to
hear what you have to say. Listening then, boosts childrensself-confidence and
self-esteem. Listening is not just about being polite with the child; good listening
is a supportive activity with an immense soothing and healing effect. Listening to
a child that feels upset or is in distress is the foundation forbuilding trustwith
that child. By spending time listening, we are perceived as working with the child
rather than against the child. The teacher who listens to children is trusted more
than the teacher that grabs the talking stick and goes straight into lecturing,
nagging, judging, and/or reprimanding. Only when they trust us, children will talk
with us, and only when we listen to children, we will earn that trust. As an added
benefit, when we listen first, children follow by listening to us when is our turn to
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
37/73
talk. In child guidance, the teacher or counselor accomplishes more by
concentrating in listening with very little talking.
Listening TypesListening types are based upon (1) how attentive we are or depth and (2)
our intention for listening orpurpose. Based on depth, some common listening
types are:
Initial listening. Sometimes, we listen to the first few words or sentences,and then, we start thinking about what we want to say in return. Chances
are that, from the very beginning, we are going to interrupt the child. We
stopped listening the very first moment we started rehearsing our response
in our heads.
Casual listening. At this level, we seem to be listening, but in reality, we arenot paying that much attention to the message. At best, our attention is
fluctuating a lot.
Partial listening. To be fair, with our busy lives and schedules, partiallistening is what the majority of us do mostly. With partial listening, we are
paying attention most of the time, but not all of the time. We start listening
to the child with the best of our intentions, but then, for one reason or
another (e.g. a sound, people interrupting, something that the child said, or
even our own thoughts), we get distracted and lose the thread of what the
child is saying. When that happens to us, it is best to acknowledge the fact
that we were distracted, asking the child to repeat what she said.
Selective listening. Listening for specific information while ignoring the rest.In other words, we hear what we want to hear and pay little attention and
disregard the extraneous details. Active listening. Another name for active listening is attentive listening.
Here, we are listening carefully, showing interest in the message and
encouraging the student to keep talking.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
38/73
Full listening. In full listening, we pay close and careful attention to whatthe child is saying in a genuine attempt to understand the full content of
the communication. Full listening is a form of active listening that requires
that we pause both to check that our understanding is accurate and for
partial summaries. By the end of the conversation, we need to be able to
summarize the verbal exchange.
Deep listening. This type of listening goes way beyond the intensity of fulllistening. There is deeper meaning found in howthe child says things (i.e.
tone of voice, pitch, posture, and gestures), so, we listen between the
lines in order to understand the childs spoken and unspoken meanings
and motivators. In deep listening, we pay attention to the emotion
(expressed and unexpressed), watch body language, detect needs, identifythe childs goals, and identify preferences and beliefs. In other words, we
seek to understand the whole child behind the words. In therapeutic
settings, other names for this kind of listening are whole-person listening
and total listening. Sport coaches know this intense listening as level three
listening, that is, listening with all our senses: our eyes, our ears, our
intuition, and gut (For more information on depth of listening, see DeVito,
2009 and Duck and McMahon, 2012).
Based onpurpose, some common listening types cited by communication
experts (See for example, Duck and McMahon, 2012) are:
Discriminative listening. This is the most basic type of listening. Indiscriminative listening, we listen to identify the difference between phonic
sounds or physical sounds like a baby crying or a bell ringing.
Content listening. This is the equivalent of full listening; other names forthis type are informative listening and comprehension listening. Once we
discriminate sounds, we need to make sense of them. Individual soundscome together to form words, and individual words put together create
phrases and sentences. In comprehending the meaning of those words and
sentences the rules of grammar and syntax come into play. Basically,
content or comprehensive listening is listening to understand and to seek
meaning. In communication, some words, phrases, and sentences are more
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
39/73
important than others are, so, we need good comprehension to be able to
separate key information from less important information.
Biased listening. Our labels and perceptions about the individual child biaswhat we hear. In biased listening, we process the information through
the filter of our own biases, preconceptions, and assumptions. Like
selective listening, we hear only what we want to hear, misinterpreting or
distorting the rest. Biased listening is evaluative and judgmental in nature.
Critical listening. Other names for this type are evaluative listening andjudgmental listening. As the names suggest, this is listening in order to
criticize, evaluate, and/or pass judgment on what the student is saying or in
what the student is doing (behavior). Evaluative listeners judge the
message and/or behavior against their own values, assessing message andbehavior as right/wrong, good/bad, or worthy/unworthy. In addition,
evaluative or judgmental listeners see themselves as truth seekers,
looking for the truth and nothing but the truth.
Appreciative listening. In this type of listening, we are seeking certaininformation that we like, and we listen for pleasure. For example, listening
to music or poetry. In the classroom, appreciative listeners are teachers
that actively look for ways to accept and appreciate children, searching for
opportunities to praise and compliment their students.
Sympathetic listening. In sympathetic listening, we are listening withconcern for the childs feelings and well-being. We care about what the
child is saying and show that it matters to us by expressing our sorrow (e.g.
Im sorry to hear that your hamster is missing) or happiness (e.g.Im
really glad that you found your hamster).
Empathetic listening. When we demonstrate empathy, we are seeking tounderstand what the child is feeling, but, contrary to sympathy,we do not
take ownership ofthe childs feelings (for example, feeling sad when the
child is sad and feeling happy when the child is happy). Empathetic listening
requires the ability to notice the emotional signals expressed in nonverbal
communication; for example, You seem annoyed and You sound sad.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
40/73
Therapeutic listening. Therapeutic listening is a form of empathetic listening(seeking to understand what the child is feeling and demonstrating our
empathy), but, at the therapeutic level, we use our deep connection with
the child to help him understand, develop, and/or change his behavior in
some way.
Reflective listening. Reflective listening is an example of therapeuticlistening, requiring both in-depth listening skills and in-depth speaking
skills. In reflective listening, we pay attention to the child, and then, we
reflect back what she just said, encouraging the child to build on her
thoughts and feelings. For example, Thats interesting; can you tell me
more about it? Alternatively,From what I hear, I get the impression that
you
Bad Listening Behaviors
In listening, certain behaviors negatively influence how well we listen to a
childs concern. Some bad listening habits that we can name are:
Listening only for facts (disregarding the childs feelings). Focusing on details only, missing the bigger picture. Hearing only superficial information, missing the real meaning. Asking too many questions about details. Letting the emotions (e.g. anger) and/or emotional words (e.g. cursing)
block the message.
Shutting down feelings, for example, Chill out. Stop feeling so angry! Force-fitting the childs message into our own mental mold (stuck in our
own heads). Criticizing the child. Giving our opinion too soon in the interaction. Judging what the child just said, for example, How could you do something
like that?
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
41/73
Blaming the child and prejudging culpability. Evaluating the message and/or the behavior, for example, Well, if you
werent so angry
Correcting the child, for example, Thats not how it happened. The otherkids are saying that you were the one who started this fight. Rushing the child, making her feel that we do not have the time to listen to
her concern.
Listening Skills
To build trust and to create rapport with children, teachers need to
cultivate the habit ofgood listening, or listening skills. The first and mostimportant habit of good listening is topay attention to the child, not only with our
ears, but with our body and mind too. Our body language communicates to the
child that we are attentive, for example, face turned to the child, torso leaned
forward, eyes wide-open, and raised eyebrows. Body language experts say that
the trick to show an attentive body language is to do it firstfrom inside our heads.
When we care for the child and are truly interested in what he has to say, then
our body attitude will follow our mind attitude.
The second listening habit that we need to develop is to manage how we
react to what the child says. It is important that we are aware of our own internal
values, biases, and inferences. This does not mean that we need to inhibit our
values; it simply means that we are not going to let our personal belief system be
the defining force in the kinds of interactions that we are having with the child.
Regardless of what the student says, we do not put down the child by reacting in
an intense emotional way, for example, getting angry and making threats. (E.g.
Youre going to see what happens if you keep that up!) Our face-to-faceinteractions with challenging students improve greatly when westop reacting to
the childs words and behaviors; we are the ones that control the interaction with
gestures and body language that lead the child to calmness coupled with a
soothing voice that dissolves strong emotions.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
42/73
Other listening skills that teachers benefit to know are:
1. Sensitivity. We can define sensitivity as being responsive to the childsfeelings, being interested and open enough to find out, understand the
childs perspective, and respect the childs individuality (Adapted from
Nichols, 2009).Among the things that teachers can do to show sensitivity
are: paying attention, listening without agreeing or disagreeing, listening
without giving our opinion and/or criticizing the child, noticing how the
child appears to be feeling, acknowledging those feelings, and asking about
the feelings, but without pushing too hard.
2.Acceptance. Borrowed from Carl Rogers client-centered therapy, thelistening skill of acceptance closely resembles the skill of empathy. With
acceptance, we understand that it is the students experience, not theteachers experience. In other words, we are recognizing and respecting the
childs rights to his own perception of the event, to his own interpretation,
and to his own feelings. Our personal perspective and interpretation of the
event should not dictate the way we respond. Instead, we genuinely try to
grasp the childs perspective and experience, and then, we reflect our
understanding back to the child. Acceptance is not the same as agreement.
We are simply accepting what the child is saying; we are neither accepting
the problem itself, nor agreeing with it. We stay neutral, even when we
disapprove of the message or behavior. Simple ways to communicate
acceptance are nodding, touching the child on the shoulder, giving minimal
encouragers (e.g. aha, go ahead), and keeping a serene facial expression.
Keeping aligned with client-centered principles, we believe and accept that,
when they learn the right social skills, children develop competence in self-
managing behavior.
3.
Supporting. Good listening skills always involve helping students feel betterabout themselves.We support children emotionally when we validate their
ideas, concerns, and feelings. What the child worries about is real for the
child and is important to her. In supporting the child, the teacher would say
something like this, This seems difficult, but we are not going to give up
until we understand why you Alternatively, youcan say, Im on your
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
43/73
side, lets work on this situation togetherand Lets see what we can do
together.
4. Non-Judgment. Being non-judgmental comes together with the listeningskill of acceptance. Non-judgment means suspending our own frame of
reference, that is, halting our own perception and interpretation of the
problem long enough so that we can truly hear the child. Without negative
criticism, we enter the childs perceptual world. Simply put, we handle the
controversial issue with so much care and sensitivity that the child feels
heard in a no accusatory way.
The Expressive Side of Communication: Speaking
When we listen to children, we open the door to communication; however,
to keep that door open, reaching childrens inner world (the world where
perceptions and feelings are), we need expressive skills or speaking skills.
Effective speaking skills facilitate the communication, but the wrong message said
at the wrong time will end that communication right away. To encourage children
share thoughts and feelings in an honest and genuine way, generalguidelines to
follow are:
Keep the conversation private. Maintain confidentiality. Be brief and keep your sentences short. Be concise, using fewer words than the child is. If you are the one doing
most of the talking, chances are that you are lecturing or reprimanding.
Be concrete, focusing on specifics rather than generalities. To help childrenfocus on specifics, ask for examples, e.g., Give me an example.
Respond only to what the child says about herself, not about other people.When the child names or blames another person, redirect the conversation
back to the child, asking something like, And how do you feel about that?
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
44/73
Keep the conversation in the here and now. Do not talk about old issues orthe childs personal history. Talk only about what is pertinent in the
particular situation.
Give the child enough time to complete his thoughts. Give the child time to make his point, acknowledge it (e.g. Your point is
or What you are saying is), and only then you talk. Control the impulse
to focus the conversation on you and what you want to say. The focus of
the conversation is always on the child, never on the teacher.
If the child has weak expressive skills, it is okay to help him articulate hisideas. Providepositive encouragement(e.g. nod, smile, and/or say
something positive like, You can do this Go ahead); tell the child to talk
around the word(i.e. describing the word, telling the use or function,
and/or using easier words), or you can ask the child for examples. In
addition, you canparaphrase the message(put it in different words), or you
can say, Let me see if Im following. You are saying Am I right?
Do not give the solution to the child or children; it is students job to findthe solutions to their social problems, not teachers job. Teachers give
support, guide, mediate, and coach, but they do not solve problems for
children. Recognize when it is time to speak and when it is time to listen. Make yourself available at the critical points. Before saying anything, think of the effect that your words would have.
Consider if the message creates the effect that you want it to achieve.
Speaking Skills
Speaking skills are structured ways to respond to children. We assure
children that we understand their social-emotional needs, and we make children
feel confident that we are going to address those needs. This interpersonal
communication approach requires active listening skills (accepting both the child
and the childs arguments), so that we respond with sensitivity and empathy. In
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
45/73
doing this, we are modeling to children the language and behavior that we want
them to use in return. Effective speaking skills encourage children to build on
their thoughts and feelings, and to explore deeper. Among the speaking skills that
we can use are:
1. Repeating. To show understanding, we simplyrepeat the childs position.From time to time, we repeat a key word or a short phrase, for example,
the child says, With my friends and the teacher repeats, Friends The
child continues, We were playing basketball and the teacher says,
Playing basketball If necessary, modify the language, for example, from
I didnt mean to kick Frankie to You didnt mean it This simple
strategy can be very encouraging: repeat, pause, and let the child fill-in the
gap and keep on talking. In addition, repeating what the child sayssometimes helps in clarifying meaning. On occasions, when we say
something aloud is when we first understand the meaning.
2. Elaborating. In elaboration, we invite and encourage children to tell usmore. Adding to what we said earlier, repeating a word, a phrase, or a
sentence cues children that we are interested in what they are saying and
we want to hear more. For example:
Kenneth: I was in the lunchroom minding my own businessMs. Duff:You were in the lunchroom minding your own businessKenneth: I was just playing with cards.Ms. Duff: Playing with cardsKenneth: Theresa was cursing too.Ms. Duff: Cursing
Another way of cueing the child is saying Interesting or How
interesting! Alternatively, we can simply tell or ask the child, for example,
Tell me more about or Can you please tell me more about that?
3.Acknowledging. When we acknowledge, we reflect back thefeeling(expressed or unexpressed) in the message, for example, You seem
angry, You sound discouraged,or This sounds difficult to talk about.
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
46/73
Acknowledging feelings lets the child know that we listened, and that we
understood the message.
4. Paraphrasing. On this speaking skill, we hear thefeeling or attitude of whatthe child is saying (expressed or unexpressed), and we reword (paraphrase)
this feeling or attitude in a restatement. Simply put, in paraphrasing, we are
repeatingthe childs position in our own words, without anything added or
taken away. Good paraphrasing includes some of the words and phrases
that the child used, key ideas, and, if any, the repeated theme. This is what
the neuro-linguistic tradition calls capturing the essence of the message.
If we changed meaning or missed key information, our rewording will make
it obvious. It is important that, after paraphrasing, we ask the child to
confirm or correct our understanding of her feelings and thoughts.Paraphrasing helps children in clarifying their own feelings; some children
are unaware of how they feel until they hear a restatement of it. Some
sentence starters that we can use in paraphrasing are:
What you are saying is Am I right? Let me make sure that Im following what you are saying. You feel
that Is that what you mean?
You mean Did I get it right? You think You believe It seems to you As you see it Correct me if Im wrong, but From where I stand, you As I understand this, you (want or plan) to
The next speaking skills all require that we paraphrase the childs messagein one form or another, but for different purposes.
5. Checking Perceptions. Each time we listen to children, in addition to gettinginformation, we are forming impressions and perceptions about that
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
47/73
information. It is important that we confirm the validity of our perceptions.
To check perceptions, some sentence starters that we can use are:
I get the impression that you think Is that how it is? Let me see if Im getting this right. You Im picking up that you kids want As I am sensing this, you I understand the problem is What I hear in all of this is What I hear you kids saying is This is what I understand you want This is my perception of this situation
6. Verifying. This is a way of checking perceptions focusing on childrensfeelings. Here, we verify if our assumptions about the childs feelings are
accurate. Examples of sentence starters are:
You sound worry about this test. Is that how you feel? Perhaps you are feeling guilty. Is that true? You seem offended speaking of _____. Is that correct? Tell me if Im wrong, but somehow I get the impression that you
were disappointed with Lisas reaction. Do you feel a little scared? My feeling is that you are agonizing with this decision. Am I right? You appear to be feeling that your friends betrayed you.
7. Clarifying. To clarify, we askquestionsthat help fill-in the blanks, getdetails, get more information, and explore all sides of the issue. These
facilitative questions, always start with who, when, where, what, or how;
excluding why. To clarify feelings, needs, or intentions, we can use guessing
phrasessuch as Were you wanting? or Were you trying to? Because
questions and guessing phrases are tentative language, we can get the
facts we need without blaming, labeling, or assigning culpability. To clarify,
we can use a sentence starter such as, Im stuck right now. It would help
7/28/2019 Watch Your Language! Ways of Talking and Interacting with Students that Crack the Behavior Code- Excerpt
48/73
me if I knew more about what happened. Will you kids help me out?
Alternatively, we can paraphrase, using sentence starters such as:
Im not sure I am following. Did you mean that? Let me see if Im getting this right. What I hear you saying is Am I
right?