Post on 05-Nov-2015
description
VIKALPA VOLUME 39 NO 3 JULY - SEPTEMBER 2014 93
Tweet Your Tune Social Media, theNew Pied Piper in Talent Acquisition
Debolina Dutta
KEY WORDS
Social Networking
Strategic Recruitment
Applicant Attraction
Employer Branding
There is consensus in research that there exists a war for talent and that win-
ning this war is critical for an organization to gain strategic and competitive
advantage (Chambers, Foulon, Handfield-Jones, Hankin, & Michaels, 1998;
Gatewood, Gowan, & Lautenschlager, 1993; Michaels, Handfield-Jones, & Axelrod,
2001; Rynes, 1991; Turban & Greening, 1997). Early stages of applicant attraction thus
become critical, especially in a robust job market, as the potential recruits have a number
of choices about where to employ their human capital (Aiman-Smith, Bauer, & Cable,
2001).
Human resource management has been unknowingly using marketing strategies to
sell the employment product and job offer (Price, 1996). Moving forward, talent ac-
quisition leaders would be required to think like marketers while developing media
and sourcing strategies. Competencies traditionally considered as marketing and sales
skills (e.g. competitive analysis, product positioning, and target group segmentation)
are increasingly becoming a part of the required talent acquisition skill set. To measure
the corresponding outcomes through a different yardstick than what is convention-
ally used by HR functions to measure recruitment efficiencies requires the develop-
ment of appropriate metrics.
Job seekers psychologically engage with an organization through various sources of
information which shape their attitude and beliefs, and hence their image of the or-
ganization. In todays age, social networking as a recruitment tool is gaining popular-
ity (Doherty, 2010). Organizations embracing this channel are perceived as evolving,
innovative, and open to technological change. With the growing interaction of the
current generation on social media sites, organizations are waking up to the potential
of leveraging these channels to build their brand images and attract applicants to their
organizations.
This paper looks at integrating research on recruitment with literature on marketing
communication and social media to propose a quantifiable approach to leveraging
social media for strategic recruitment. The aim is to develop a systematic approach
which organizations can use to delineate their strategy, choose the appropriate social
media channels, and understand and define the metrics involved for each channel
and the related investments required for successfully carrying out social media re-
cruitment.
NOTES AND
COMMENTARIES
presents preliminaryresearch, review of
literature and commentson published papers or on
any relevant subject
94
LITERATURE REVIEW
Recruitment
Recruitment has always been a critical function respon-
sible for attracting and selecting the right talent for or-
ganizations (Schneider, 1987). So, while an organizations
human resources are perfectly inimitable (Lippman &
Rumelt, 1982), organizations that succeed in winning the
war for talent are able to attract larger pools of quality
applicants and achieve a huge competitive advantage over
their rivals (Michaels, Handfield-Jones, & Axelrod, 2001).
These organizations have a clear two-fold strategic ad-
vantage over their competitors, i.e. the ability to be more
selective in their hiring decisions, which increases the
effectiveness of their overall staffing systems (Boudreau
& Rynes, 1985) and the ability to earn above-normal re-
turns through the acquisition and deployment of human
talent (Barney, 1986; Lado & Wilson, 1994). Thus, the
competence to attract, recruit, develop, and retain high
calibre talent is the single-most important determinant of
organizational effectiveness and a source of competitive
advantage (Borstorff, Marker, & Bennett, 2007). The re-
cruitment function of an organization serves as the en-
gine focused on winning this war and providing the
competitive advantage.
Recruitment has been defined in multiple ways. Rynes
(1991) defined it as encompassing all organizational
practices and decisions that affect either the number or
types of individuals that are willing to apply for, or to
accept, a given vacancy(p. 429). The definition proposed
by Barber (1998) was much narrower in scope and in-
cluded only the purposeful actions taken by the organiza-
tions. According to Breaugh & Starke (2000), Recruitment
consists of those organizational practices with the pri-
mary purpose of identifying potential employees, inform-
ing them about the job and organizational attributes, and
persuading them to join the organization. A more recent
definition by Breaugh (2013) says that recruitment is de-
fined as an employers actions that are intended to (1)
bring a job opening to the attention of potential job candi-
dates who do not currently work for the organization, (2)
influence whether these individuals apply for the open-
ing, (3) affect whether they maintain interest in the posi-
tion until a job offer is extended, and (4) influence whether
a job offer is accepted. While this definition appears to be
the most relevant in extending the realm of recruitment to
encompass the influence of social media, it does not ad-
dress what organizations do to enhance the employer
brand, even in the absence of an active job opening. It is
therefore suggested that the definition of recruitment
needs to be expanded beyond those related to active re-
cruitment and to include all activities by an organization
which help bring potential applicants into the consid-
eration set of the organization. This can be considered as
passive recruitment. Hence, recruitment can be defined
as all the activities undertaken by an organization to en-
hance its employer brand which helps it to attract both
active and passive applicants to the organization for cur-
rent and future job opportunities and which influences
them to apply, maintain interest during the selection proc-
ess, and join at the appropriate time.
Barber (1998) delineated three phases of recruitment as
applicant attraction, recruitment operations, and final job
choice decision. Breaugh and Starke (2000) outlined a
recruitment framework wherein the recruitment objectives
(retention, job performance, cost, speed of filling, etc.) were
instrumental in driving the strategy development for the
recruitment function. This in turn, led to the recruitment
activities, with applicant related intervening variables of
applicant attraction, message credibility, accuracy of ap-
plicants expectations, self-insight of applicants knowl-
edge, skills, ability, and needs mediating the recruitment
results (Breaugh & Starke, 2000).
It is important that the communication made during the
process of recruitment is both consistent and credible
(Breaugh & Billings, 1988), not only during the initial
stages of application but also during the recruitment proc-
ess, for organizations to successfully attract talent. This
credibility and consistency in communication is assessed
by the applicants during the process (Rynes, 1991) and
also helps explain the greater effectiveness of the various
internal recruitment sources such as employee referrals,
internal transfers, or re-hires (Zottolli & Wanous, 2000).
For instance, Saks & Cronshaw (1990) found the realistic
job previews to be more credible when presented by the
recruiter rather than the written format. Applicants tend
to infer job and organizational information based on the
organizational image projected along with the percep-
tions formed during their early interactions with the or-
ganization, if the information is not clearly provided by
the organization (Ryan & Tippins, 2004). Recruitment
research suggests that individuals might discount organi-
zations when exposed to neutral information (Collins &
Stevens, 2002). So, from a recruitment context, this means
TWEET YOUR TUNE SOCIAL MEDIA, THE NEW PIED PIPER IN TALENT ACQUISITION
VIKALPA VOLUME 39 NO 3 JULY - SEPTEMBER 2014 95
that neutral news is not necessarily good news. Hence,
the method of message delivery becomes important, apart
from the content. All of this provides important linkages
to the manner in which information is disseminated in
the social media.
The financial implications of recruitment, turnover or at-
trition, for both entry level and senior management, sug-
gest the need for better and effective recruitment practices
(Sanford, 2005). Wright and McMahan (1992) defined
strategic human resource management as the pattern of
planned human resource deployment and activities in-
tended to enable an organization to achieve its goals.
Strategic recruitment would require a synergy of recruit-
ment activities and processes with the organization goals.
It is also of interest to see what recruitment strategies and
processes help organizations gain a competitive advan-
tage in attracting talent in a manner to retain them through
mobility barriers (Caves & Porter, 1977), thus immobi-
lizing the perfectly mobile resources (Barney, 1986). Since
recruitment can help organizations achieve competitive
advantage through its ability to accumulate new resources
more efficiently and effectively relative to competitors
(Delery, 1998; Mahoney & Pandian, 1992; Prahalad &
Hamel, 1990), a convergence of the organizations strat-
egy with the recruitment strategy and implementation
becomes critical for recruitment to deliver strategic value.
For instance, a recruitment function which remains in-
ward-looking and focused on managing costs, or improv-
ing its source mix, may be harming the organization by
delaying a quicker resource fulfilment. Today, it has be-
come imperative for an organizations HR to understand,
articulate, and operationalize an appropriate social me-
dia recruitment strategy, which will help the function and
the organization as a whole. Those organizations that
leverage social media strategically have an opportunity
to deepen connections with their target users, building
affinity, and loyalty (Powers et al., 2012).
Proposition 1: The more recruitment communica-
tion is linked to organizations strategic goals,
the more effective it is likely to be.
Applicant Attraction
The whole purpose of an organizations communication
before and during the process of recruitment is to attract
potential job applicants to the organization (Breaugh &
Starke, 2000). Thus recruitment communication can be
defined as any recruitment information which is person-
ally relevant to an applicant and messages received dur-
ing interactive communication (Breaugh & Starke, 2000)
to attract applicants. Allen, VanScotter, and Otondo (2004)
found face-to-face interactive communication being rated
as the richest medium to attract applicants, followed by
text communication which was rated higher than pure
audio communication in richness. The Psychology lit-
erature indicates that more the information (both positive
and negative) prior to the start of employment, lower is
the turnover (Farr, OLeary, & Bartlett, 1973; Gannon,
1971; Wanous, 1973; 1975). All of this indicates that the
information about when and how the applicant receives
his information about the organization and the role can
influence the applicants behaviour after joining the or-
ganization. The power of social media emerges as a rich
interactive channel for contextualizing and personaliz-
ing the communication at an individual level.
The antecedents to job application are the cognitive and
affective processing of information about job choices,
wherein a congruency is sought between applicants
needs and the perceived job and organizations offerings.
What people construe as distinctive, central, and endur-
ing about the organization helps define the organiza-
tional image (Dutton, Dukerich, & Harquail, 1994). An
organizations image plays an important role in the minds
of the applicant and helps him differentiate the organiza-
tion from its competitors (Aaker, 1997; Cable & Turban,
2003; Scott & Lane, 2000). Hence, being able to establish a
favourable image in the mind of the applicant can help
an organization attract a larger and more qualified talent
pool to its door.
Employer branding has been defined as the sum of a
companys efforts to communicate to existing and pro-
spective staff that it is a desirable place to work (Edwards,
2010). This is analogous to customer-based brand equity
(Aaker, 1997) which helps in creating a unique favour-
able brand image in the target customers mind and helps
increase the likelihood of the product or service being
chosen over other similar products or services; employer
branding also works in a similar fashion for the appli-
cant pool. Employer attractiveness or the perceived ben-
efit that the applicant may get by being employed by an
organization, is the antecedent to the development of an
effective employer brand (Arachchige & Robertson, 2011).
Rynes (1991) suggested that given the small amount of
information available to applicants early in the job choice
96
process, initial application decisions are heavily based
on general impressions of organizational attractiveness
or organizational image. Belt and Paolillo, (1982) found
applicant responses to organizations with a better image
to be significantly higher. Fisher, Ilgen, and Hoyer (1979)
showed that graduating students found information ob-
tained from people outside the organization to be more
credible than the same information obtained from organi-
zational representatives. This indicates that job applicants
are significantly influenced by their reference groups. This
becomes important in the context of social media, where
the level of peer communication is very high. This is also
substantiated by Kilduff (1990), who found the graduat-
ing MBA students being more attracted to organizations
most preferred by their peers. Collins and Stevens (2002)
argued that applicants could rely on employer brand
images for guidance in decision-making, since in many
cases, the true attributes of the job and company may not
be easily known. Therefore, establishing the employer
brand becomes critical for organizations hoping to at-
tract high calibre talent. All of this research indicates that
organizations can significantly leverage the power of so-
cial media to establish and communicate an attractive
employer brand and influence initial applicant decision.
Research indicates that applicants move through a
gradual process of bringing an organization into their
consideration set, evaluating it through the lens of their
work values, before making the decision to apply for the
job. The behaviour of highly skilled job seekers in a tight
labour market is similar to that of consumers in a crowded
marketplace (Collins & Stevens, 2002). The job choice proc-
ess begins with an individuals evaluation of informa-
tion obtained from recruitment sources, including printed
advertisements, media messages, and friends (Gatewood,
Gowan, & Lautenschlager, 1993). An organizations fail-
ure to supply information may be viewed as a signal of its
lack of professionalism or of its lack of interest in the ap-
plicant (Breaugh & Starke, 2000). This indicates the need
for a concentrated effort by organizations to channelize
favourable and consistent messages through the various
channels towards their target applicant pool. Thus, even
investments in social media recruitment need a thought-
ful strategic approach by the organization, if its power is
to be harnessed.
All of this implies that while multiple information sources
(Breaugh & Starke, 2000; Fisher, Ilgen, & Hoyer, 1979;
Kilduff, 1990) influence applicants behaviour, social
media channels help organizations to not only address
and influence potential job applicant behaviour but also
build a favourable employer brand.
Proposition 2: Higher the use of social media
platforms, the greater will be the employer
branding among potential applicants to the
organization.
SOCIAL MEDIA
Social media was defined by Marketo (2010) as the pro-
duction, consumption and exchange of information
through online social interactions and platforms.
OReilly (2010) defined Web 2.0 as the second genera-
tion of Internet-based services that facilitate interactive
information sharing, social networking, collaboration and
end user participation. Hoffman and Fodor (2010) iden-
tified the 4 Cs of connection, creation, consumption, and
control as the motivators behind social media engage-
ment. The common denominator therefore is the social
media, which is a platform for communication and collabo-
ration. Since engagement and collaboration are the two
sides of the social media coin, a clear understanding of
the potential job applicants needs and commensurate
degree of information sharing is required.
The primary and secondary value creating activities of
an organization in its value chain can be significantly
influenced by social media (Yang & Mason, 1998). The
growing popularity of social networking websites like
LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter are forcing organiza-
tions to recognize the potential it provides in attracting
todays Generation Y workforce. With over millions of
users on LinkedIn and Twitter, and over a whopping 800
million users on Facebook (Hunt, 2010), clearly the large
segment available for talent acquisition is too attractive
for any HR function to ignore. The power of the internet,
of which social media is a part, is increasingly being
leveraged by HR functions for the purposes of recruit-
ment, selection and training and interacting and engag-
ing with the current and potential employees (Florkowski
& Olivas-Lujan, 2006). Research suggests HR 2.0 as a
new term for the collective human resource management
processes enabled and facilitated by Web 2.0 based ap-
plications (McAdams, 2010) and especially used in re-
cruitment through passive job seekers, branding, and
relationship building before and during the selection proc-
ess. Web 2.0 based tools and techniques like corporate
TWEET YOUR TUNE SOCIAL MEDIA, THE NEW PIED PIPER IN TALENT ACQUISITION
VIKALPA VOLUME 39 NO 3 JULY - SEPTEMBER 2014 97
intranets, blogs, and professional networks can be used
to attract and induct suitable talent. LinkedIn has been
particularly helpful for some companies in finding out
additional information about job applicants (Roberts &
Roach, 2009).
While it is generally believed that the strategy adopted by
the organization should drive its use of social media
(Hunt, 2010; Andzulis, Panagopoulos, & Rapp, 2012),
Doherty (2010) argued that organizations started look-
ing at social media as a recruitment tool due to cost pres-
sures. The question then is: Are organizations accurately
tracking and measuring the right metrics? The conven-
tional recruitment metrics measured efficacy of recruit-
ment channels through the time to hire and cost of hire
(Breaugh, 2013; Otter, 2009; Rynes, 1991). As argued ear-
lier, the applicant attraction process is analogous to tar-
geted marketing, with employer brand image and
employer value proposition helping to seal the interest.
The power of social media lies in its ability to effect pe-
ripheral persuasion, as defined by Petty and Cacioppos
(1986) elaboration likelihood model (ELM), wherein the
potential applicants lack the motivation or the ability to
carefully process a message (Breaugh, 2013).
However, as Hoffman and Fodor (2010) stated, social me-
dia diluted the circle of influence and control of the or-
ganization and placed higher levels of control on the
interfacing individuals. Organizations need to also look
at these channels as a potential area to improve employee
branding and be perceived as an employer of choice
among the Generation Y workforce. Hence, in this con-
text, apart from the conventional recruitment metrics, it
becomes necessary for HR functions to measure and evolve
metrics to assess the employer branding. As Hoffman and
Fodor (2010) stated, effective social media measurement
should start by turning the traditional ROI approach on
its headinstead of emphasizing their owninvestments
and calculating the returnsmanagers should begin by
considering consumer motivations to use social media
and then measure the social media investments custom-
ers make as they engage with the ..brands.
Social media should therefore not be thought of as simply
another channel for recruitment, another means by which
to interact with the potential applicant, or another tool by
which to manage employer brand and organization repu-
tation but, rather, all of those things simultaneously.
For the recruiters, the information available on the social
media provides additional insights into the candidates
personality, interests, and values which may not emerge
from the more conventional resume. However, there is a
clear need for caution to ensure that public and non-pro-
fessional information, if used to support a hiring deci-
sion, does not flout the discrimination policy of the
organization (Doherty, 2010).
COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL ANDSOCIAL MEDIA RECRUITMENT
Prior research on recruitment has studied pre-hire out-
comes (e.g. number of applicants, job offer acceptance
rates), post-hire outcomes (e.g. job performance, employee
turnover), recruitment objectives (cost of hire, time to hire,
number of positions filled, diversity) (Breaugh & Starke,
2000; Breaugh, 2013). It therefore becomes important to
differentiate conventional recruitment methods and out-
comes from the social media methods and outcomes in
terms of their applicability, strategy, and use. As men-
tioned earlier, prior literature has looked at recruitment
purely from the lens of active requirement fulfilment.
Therefore, all metrics defined therein depend on the out-
come of actually recruiting an applicant. This is a funda-
mental difference, since active recruitment through social
media reduces social media to just another channel. The
power of social media exists in its ability to enhance pe-
ripheral persuasion (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). As cogni-
tive and affective processing of information about the job
choices can be significantly enhanced by using social me-
dia, it provides an invaluable opportunity to influence
applicant attraction, enhance employer branding, and
target specific talent pools. Therefore, social media can be
leveraged both for active and passive recruitment, but
more importantly for passive recruitment.
Organizations today place too much emphasis on two
basic metrics Time to fill and cost per hire but fail to
sufficiently debate upon, identify, and measure a new
age parameter called quality of hire. They need to evalu-
ate if they are reaching their targeted audience vis--vis
an unwanted global audience. In the effort to get the
fastest available applicant, the most suitable applicant
may get missed out. Social media channels clearly allow
for organizations to disseminate targeted messages to a
filtered audience thereby contributing to and increasing
the quality score card.
98
An important measure of recruitment effectiveness is de-
fined by the quality of hire a parameter which organi-
zations are slowly and increasingly beginning to recognize,
while the efficiency metrics (time to fill, cost per hire, attri-
tion rate) are still measured and are still relevant. The
quality of hire measure has two dimensions: the meas-
ures of recruitment-focused quality (assessments, fit
against defined job competencies, and skills) and post-
hire contribution and performance quality index. These
measures are necessarily contextual and cannot be stand-
ardized. However, the metrics aligned to business out-
comes are generally accepted as valid measures for quality
of hire. These may be the strength of the talent pipeline
(talent mapping, sourcing, knowing the competition, and
presenting the most qualified candidates), new hire attri-
tion, assessment scores for critical roles, candidate expe-
rience (measure of perceived and actual fit), employer
experience (measure of assessed and actual fit), percent-
age of diversity, etc. These measures of quality remain
relevant even for social media recruitment.
Additionally, customized targeting of potential applicants
of defined demographics through social media lends it-
self for affirmative action in specific areas of recruitment
like increasing diversity (gender, disability, racial, etc.).
The fundamental differences between conventional re-
cruitment channels and social media recruitment are
given in Table 1.
The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technol-
ogy (Venkatesh, Thong, & Xu, 2012) postulates that a dif-
ference in age, gender, experience, habit, etc., of individual
users can result in a significant difference in the behav-
ioural intention and technology use. The performance
expectancy (degree of benefit technology will provide),
effort expectancy (degree of ease in use of technology),
facilitating conditions (perceptions of resources and sup-
port available), and social influence (extent that an appli-
cant perceives that its reference groups believes that they
should use technology) all work towards influencing
behavioural intention to use technology. The influence of
reference groups on applicants behaviour had already
been established (Van Hoye & Lievens, 2007; Van-Hoye
& Saks, 2011). All of this indicates that only an applicant
population which is technology savvy will be the tar-
geted segment of social media recruitment.
Social media may not be amenable to active recruitment
at all levels and positions; hence a judicious use of these
channels for appropriate target segments is advised. Or-
ganizations would be ill-advised to discard conventional
recruitment channels, operations, and metrics without a
careful analysis of its strategy.
STRATEGY FOR SOCIAL MEDIA RECRUITMENT
Before an organization enters the social media arena for
the purposes of talent acquisition, it must determine the
appropriate goals associated with the social media im-
plementation (Andzulis, Panagopoulos, & Rapp, 2012).
It needs to identify and understand the value proposition
for the talent pool, not just the organization. A recent
study indicated that of the 35 percent of the employers
using social media for recruitment, 21 percent are using it
to recruit and research potential employees, and 18 per-
cent are using it to strengthen their employment brands
(Hunt, 2010).
The tactical choices and investments done in social me-
dia typically emanate from four strategic goals that an
organization may have. Analogous to the strategies in the
Table 1: Differences between Conventional and Social Media Recruitment
Measure or Criteria Conventional Recruitment Social Media Recruitment
Objective / Utility Active demand fulfilment Active and passive recruitment
Channels of communication Newspapers, referrals, direct, job board, Social media channels like blog sites, micro-blogging,recruitment consultants websites and forums/discussion groups, social networks
(LinkedIn, Facebook)
Metrics of measure Pre- and post-hire outcomes, operational efficiencies Employer branding and personalized engagement
Locus of control HR function Social media community
Level of individualization Medium to low Very high
Target applicant group All individuals matching current open positions Gen Y , internet savvy, having access & active on socialmedia channels
Tenure of engagement Relatively short-term, from application to Continuous engagementon-boarding of applicant
TWEET YOUR TUNE SOCIAL MEDIA, THE NEW PIED PIPER IN TALENT ACQUISITION
VIKALPA VOLUME 39 NO 3 JULY - SEPTEMBER 2014 99
sales and marketing context, (Andzulis, Panagopoulos,
& Rapp, 2012), recruitment strategies are relationship
building, employer brand building, active recruitment,
and finally cost optimization.
Table 2 indicates the philosophy, operational investment,
and tactical outcome to be expected from each of these
strategies. Based on organizational needs, resource avail-
ability, and priorities, HR functions should carve out their
social media plan. However, it may be feasible for an or-
ganization to choose a few of these or all of these concur-
rently and decide the relative degrees of investment
required.
Due to the high costs of social media monitoring, MROCs1
provide a relatively economical alternative. However, the
inputs received here are qualitative in nature, even when
surveys and polls are used. The special nature of the re-
cruitment of MROCs and the sensitized nature of the par-
ticipants involvement means that the data should be
interpreted in a qualitative way, rather than assuming
that it directly represents the universal population. Com-
munity panels are the e-version of traditional in-house
panels and employ the latest techniques in engagement
and communities to optimize relationships with brands
(Poynter, 2011).
Organizations focused on passive recruitment or even
those having a robust succession planning policy can
look at proactively engaging with the passive job seekers
through the social media channels. The targeted and per-
sonalized engagement with the candidates creates greater
candidate loyalty to the company and makes it more
difcult for competition to attract them (Doherty, 2010).
All the above channels can also be used for monitoring
social reputation and building an aspirational employer
brand. There is a need for substantial commitment and
continuous monitoring by the HR function for social me-
dia to become a concomitant and dynamic channel within
the recruitment function.
This suggests that organizations need to follow a struc-
tured approach (See Figure 1). As indicated, the choice of
channels will flow from the desired strategy and recruit-
ment need. The performance realized will indicate the
changes required in operational investment and choices
of channels.
Table 2: Alignment of Strategy, Philosophy, Investment, and Outcome for Recruitment
Strategy Philosophy Operational Investment Tactical Outcome
Relationship strategy Trust building and collaboration Dedicated community manager focused on Strategic talent inductedthrough personalized engagement prospective talent lead generation and engagement into the organization
Employer branding Establishing credibility, gaining Social media monitoring, sentiment analysis, Organization perceivedattention, demonstrating employer creation of purposed communities, MROCs as preferred employervalue propositions and community panels. of choice
Active recruitment Reactive demand fulfilment Maintaining a dynamic career microsite Active recruitmentreflecting active open requirements positions closed
Cost optimization Reducing costs of recruitment Maintaining a dynamic career microsite and Reduce recruitmentchannels integrating with active open requirements. Dedicated spend on more
resource to close applicants from these channel expensive channels
Figure 1: Social Media Recruitment Approach
1 Market research online communities, dubbed MROCs by Forrester Research in 2008, was initially pioneered by Communispace andbecame mainstream by 2010.
Social Media Strategy Choice of Channels Metrics Operational Investment
Performance
100
The social media strategy defines the stage which an
organization can use, which thus helps in choosing the
appropriate channel. For instance, if the social media strat-
egy of an organization is active recruitment, the stage is
the career page in the organization website. This is then
linked to posting of active jobs on various job portals and
social media sites like LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter.
The metrics of efficacy will thus be the number of active
positions closed through these channels. If the intention
of using social media is to boost employer branding, the
stage becomes the website blog page, LinkedIn, and
Facebook pages where the content is updated on current
events and achievements of the organization, recent
awards and recognitions received, employee testimoni-
als, and insights into the culture of the organization. The
metrics of measurement in this case will thus become the
number of unique visits, the return visits, the search rank-
ing, number of followers/members/fans and also number
of re-blogs, frequency of badging on other sites, re-tweets,
etc. For instance, LinkedIn has defined constructs of tal-
ent brand reach and talent brand engagement and used
these to develop the concept of Talent Brand Index as a
measure of employer branding.
While this is illustrative, it becomes important to define
the stage, channel, and appropriate metrics for each in
more details so that an effective ROI can be garnered from
the use of social media in recruitment.
Proposition 3: The more social media strategy
and corresponding metrics are aligned to the
organizations strategy, the more effective would
be the social media recruitment
MEASUREMENT OF ROI IN SOCIAL MEDIARECRUITMENT
Hoffman and Fodor (2010) argued for changing the tradi-
tional ROI metrics for effective social media influence
measurement. As stated earlier, the fundamental differ-
ence between conventional recruitment and social media
recruitment is that, in the latter, the locus of control has
shifted to the applicant pool. This essentially mandates
that social media recruitment develops a different set of
metrics to measure outcomes than the conventional re-
cruitment metrics used by organizations. Therefore, in
the recruitment context, instead of emphasizing the or-
ganizational investments and calculating the returns in
terms of hires or time to hire, HR managers should begin
by considering both the applicants motivations to use
social media as well as the organizational desired out-
comes and then measure the social media investments
made by the potential applicants as they engage with the
organization brand. As Hoffman and Fodor (2010) state,
returns from social media investments will not always
be measured in dollars, but also in (applicant) behav-
iours and investments tied to particular social media ap-
plications. The argument is that this approach takes into
account both short-term (immediate recruitment fulfil-
ment) and long-term returns of significant organization
investment in social media. The key metrics should there-
fore evolve in terms of job applicants (active and pas-
sive) behaviours which are tied to particular social media
applications.. The conventional metrics of advertising of
reach and frequency or an inward-looking view of re-
cruitment cost and fulfilment time will defeat the very
purpose of social media recruiting. The intrinsic chal-
lenge is that in this medium, the applicant community
creates and consumes online content, which essentially
makes organization controlled metrics meaningless, as
the control is not with the organizations. As Hoffman
and Fodor (2010) state, the four key motivations which
drive social media are connections, creation, consumption,
and control. A significant difference is that the control
exists with the community and not with the organiza-
tion. Therefore, organizations which depend on or lever-
age the social media channels for their active operation
are most likely to gain maximum mileage from social
media recruitment. Additionally, organizations facing
challenges in acquiring key talent may look at building
relationships with potential talent pools. This can be more
easily achieved through social medial channels.
Proposition 4: Organizations which use em-
ployer branding and relationship strategy as
predominant recruitment strategies are more
likely to use social media for recruitment.
The relationship strategy is akin to brand engagement in
the marketing context, just as employer branding is analo-
gous to brand awareness, as defined by Hoffman and
Fodor (2010). Depending on the types of social media that
have been adopted for talent acquisition, there will be
different metrics and tools used to measure the impact as
shown in Table 3.
Based on the strategic goal, organizations can choose the
stage, the appropriate channel, define the operational
investments required for each channel, and then set the
TWEET YOUR TUNE SOCIAL MEDIA, THE NEW PIED PIPER IN TALENT ACQUISITION
VIKALPA VOLUME 39 NO 3 JULY - SEPTEMBER 2014 101
Table 3: Suggested Relevant Metrics for Social Media Recruitment
Social Media Strategy Suggested Stage Suggested Channels Appropriate Metrics for ROI Measurement
Relationship strategy Blog site Career page in No. of memberscompany website Average length of time on site
No. of comments No. of responses to polls, contests, surveys-Amount of user
generated content No. of RSS feed subscribers No. of references to blog in other media and re-blogs
Social network Facebook/LinkedIn page No. of comments No. of active users, friends & friends of fans No. of likes or friends feeds; sources of likes No. of user generated items-Usage metrics of applications/widgets No. of posts on wall/reposts and shares-No. of responses to
friend referral invites
Micro-blogging Twitter No. of followers No. of replies No. of Re-tweets Tweet : Re-tweet Ratio
Forum & Google groups, No. of relevant topics/threadsDiscussion groups domain groups No. of individual replies
No. of sign-ups Citation in other sites Incoming links Tagging in social bookmarking
Employer branding Blog site Career page in No. of unique visitscompany website No. of return visits
No. of times bookmarked Search ranking Ratio of Unique: Return visitors Source of traffic (search engines/other links/sites)
Social network Facebook/Linked in page No. of - reviews/ratings and valence (+/-) No. of members/fans No. of impressions and bookmarks- Total reach and viral reach- Source of traffic (search engines/
other links/sites)
Micro-blogging Twitter No. of tweets about the organization-Valence of tweets (+/-) No. of followers No. of filtered clicks No. of mentions
Forum & Google groups, No. of page viewsdiscussion groups domain groups No. of visits-Valence of posted content (+/-)
Active recruitment Blog site, Social Career page in Ratio of job postings: joineesnetwork, Micro- company website No. of applicants to active jobsblogging linked with active Apply click ratio (no. of people landing on the page vs
jobs on online number of people applying after landing)recruitment portal No. of hires through this channel
job postings on Face- Ratio of Unique: Return visitorsbook/Linked in/Twitter Time to fill - Cost per hire
Cost optimization Blog site, Social network, Jobs on career site, Sourcing cost per hire through social media channels vsMicro-blogging other channels
Note: Adapted from Hoffman and Fodor (2010).
102
determined metric outcomes. While there clearly are com-
plexities in calculating the ROI for social media recruit-
ment, apart from the issues of size test, control samples
and recruitment outcomes, a longer-term study could link
the quality and tenure of hire to the source, apart from
assessing applicant satisfaction levels in engagement
through various channels. This longitudinal study will
help establish the proxy estimates to generate the calcu-
lations necessary to link social media investment to HR
outcomes. What is irrefutable is that without effective
measurement, there will be deterioration in the effective-
ness of the medium over time. Without a focused effort to
develop metrics in the context of the 4 cs (Hoffman &
Fodor, 2010), the social media recruitment efforts will re-
main fuzzy and essentially become just a flash in the pan,
possibly even harming the organization and the employer
brand.
Since the stage for social media could be common across
the various strategies, it becomes important to cite the
appropriate metric for the related strategy. Since relation-
ship strategy is analogous to brand engagement, as de-
fined by Hoffman and Fodor (2010), where a targeted pool
is engaged through personalized relationship, metrics like
number of members, RSS feed subscribers, amount of user
generated content, length of time spent on site, and re-
sponse to polls/contests/surveys become relevant. How-
ever, if the social media strategy is used to increase
employer branding and thereby enhance the organiza-
tions image (Aaker, 1997; Arachchige & Robertson, 2011;
Cable & Turban, 2003), the same platforms would require
different yardsticks to measure the impact. Here it be-
comes more critical to assess the impact on a larger talent
pool vis--vis a targeted talent pool. Hence metrics like
the number of visits, the time spent, the valence of blog
comments, and updates on Facebook and Twitter pages
can be used to measure outcomes like organization brand
awareness and word-of-mouth increase. For relationship
strategy of the same platforms of Facebook and Twitter,
number of comments, active user/followers, would be
more appropriate.
IMPLICATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
The goal of this paper was to present a broad overview of
social media and its role in the strategic recruitment. It
also looked at building parallels between marketing con-
cepts and applicant attraction and discussed how social
media provides a logical platform for working on appli-
cant attraction. Apart from applicant attraction through
employer branding, social media can also be leveraged
for active recruitment. However, there exist clear differ-
ences in the approach and philosophy of conventional
and social media recruitment. This therefore necessitates
articulating the relevant strategy and then defining ap-
propriate metrics to check for achievement of the same
depending on whether organizations want to pursue
strategies of relationship building, employer brand en-
hancement, active recruitment or cost optimization, the
choice of channels, the appropriate investment and the
corresponding metrics of measuring desired objectives
change. While social media is opening the doors and
changing the way recruitment functions, it should not be
mistaken as the recruitment strategy going forward but
rather a part of the recruiting strategy. When an organi-
zation looks to attract and hire candidates, emphasis
needs to be laid upon what an organizations employee
value proposition is and on the basis of this value propo-
sition and the organizations culture, growth path, and
hiring needs, a recruitment plan needs to be laid out along
with milestones and objectives to see how they can be met.
As this area is relatively new, there are countless avenues
to proceed with future research. The focus of this paper
was on the more important and influential areas of social
media in the domain of talent acquisition. This paper has
provided some critical take-away for organizations HR
functions in terms of summarizing the approaches and
desired outcomes based on the organizations HR strat-
egy. The limitations of this paper are that the concepts
and suggested metrics have to be empirically substanti-
ated, which provides clear avenues for future research.
The additional areas for future research that were uncov-
ered in writing this paper were security/privacy concerns
of the applicants as well as the ethics of using informa-
tion available in the social media for making recruitment
decisions. Additionally, the use of social media in other
domains of HR practices such as learning and develop-
ment, employee engagement, etc. have not been explored.
As the body of academic work in this field slowly replaces
the practitioner pieces in the way an army strategists cull
the best practices learned on a battlefield, social media
will become a substantial source for future research that
has the potential to shape, craft, and transform not only
HR strategy, but also corporate strategy for years to come.
It is hoped that this research would open the door for
insightful research on the role of social media in the world
of strategic human resources.
TWEET YOUR TUNE SOCIAL MEDIA, THE NEW PIED PIPER IN TALENT ACQUISITION
VIKALPA VOLUME 39 NO 3 JULY - SEPTEMBER 2014 103
REFERENCES
Aaker, J. J. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal ofMarketing Research, 34(3), 347-355.
Aiman-Smith, L., Bauer, T. N., & Cable, D. M. (2001). Are youattracted? Do you intent to pursue? A recruiting policy-capturing study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(2),219-237.
Allen, D. G., VanScotter, J. R., & Otondo, R. F. (2004). Recruit-ment communication media : Impact on prehire out-comes. Personnel Psychology, 57(1), 143-171.
Andzulis, J. M., Panagopoulos, N. G., & Rapp, A. (2012). Areview of social media and implications for the salesprocess. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management,32(3), 305.
Andzulis, J. M., Panagopoulos, N. G., & Rapp, A. (2012). Areview of social media and implications for the salesprocess. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management,32(3), 35.
Arachchige, B. J., & Robertson, A. (2011). Business studentperceptions of a preferred employer: A study identify-ing determinants of employer branding. The IUP Journalof Brand Management, VIII(3),25-46 .
Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting employees: Individual and organi-zational perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publica-tions.
Barney, J. B. (1986). Strategic factor markets, expectations, luck,and business strategy. Management Science, 32,(10), 1231-1241.
Belt, J. A., & Paolillo, J. G. (1982). The influence of corporateimage and specificity of candidate qualifications on re-sponse to recruitment advertisements. Journal of Man-agement, 8(1), 105-112.
Borstorff, P. C., Marker, M. B., & Bennett, D. S. (2007). Onlinerecruitment attitudes and behaviors of job seekers. Jour-nal of Strategic E-Commerce, 5(2), 1-23.
Boudreau, J. W., & Rynes, S. L. (1985). Role of recruitment instaffing utility analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2),354-366.
Breaugh, J. A. (2013). Employee recruitment. Annual Review ofPsychology, 64(1), 389-416.
Breaugh, J. A., & Billings, R. S. (1988). The realistic job pre-view: Five key elements and their importance for re-search and practice. Journal of Business and Psychology,2(4) 291-305.
Breaugh, J. A., & Starke, M. (2000). Research on employeerecruitment: So many studies, so many remaining ques-tions. Journal of Management, 26(3), 405-434.
Cable, D. M., & Turban, D. B. (2003). The value of organiza-tional reputation in the recruitment context: A brand-equity perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,33(11), 2244-2266.
Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. (1977). From entry barriers tomobility barriers: Conjectural decisions and contrived.The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 91(2), 44-57.
Chambers, E. G., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S.
M., & Michaels, E. G. (1998). The war for talent. McKinseyQuarterly, 3, 44-57.
Collins, C. J., & Stevens, C. K. (2002). The relationship be-tween early recruitment-related activities and the ap-plication decisions of new labor market entrants: Abrand equity approach to recruitment. Journal of AppliedPsychology, 87(6), 1121-1133.
Delery, J. E. (1998). Issues of fit in strategic human resourcemanagement: Implications for research. Human ResourceManagement Review, 8(3), 289-309.
Doherty, R. (2010). Getting social with recruitment. StrategicHR Review, 9(6), 11-15.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organi-zational images and member identification. Administra-tive Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263.
Edwards, M. R. (2010). An integrative review of employerbranding and OB theory. Personnel Review, 39(1), 5-23.
Farr, J. L., OLeary, B. S., & Bartlett, C. J. (1973). Effects of worksample test upon self selection and turnover of job ap-plicants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58(2), 283-285.
Fisher, C. D., Ilgen, D. R., & Hoyer, W. D. (1979). Source cred-ibility, information favorability, and job offer accep-tance. Academy of Management Journal, 22(1),94-103.
Florkowski, G. W., & Olivas-Lujan, H. R. (2006). The diffusionof human resource information technology innovationsin US and non-US firms. Personnel Review, 35(6), 684-710.
Gannon, M. J. (1971). Sources of referral and employee turn-over. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 226-228.
Gatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1993).Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial jobchoice decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36(2),414-427.
Hoffman, D. L., & Fodor, M. (2010). Can you measure the ROIof your social media marketing? MIT Sloan ManagementReview, 52(1), 41-49.
Hunt, K. G. (2010). Finders keepers: Social media strategieshelp find top talent. Journal of Property Management, 75(6),36-40.
Kilduff, M. (1990). The interpersonal structure of decisionmaking: A social comparison approach to organiza-tional choice. Organizational Behavior and Human DecisionProcesses, 47(2), 270-288.
Lado, A. A., & Wilson, M. C. (1994). Human resource systemsand sustained competitive advantage: A competencybased perspective. Academy of Management Review, 19(4),699-727.
Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability:An analysis of inter-firm differences in efficiency undercompetition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418-438.
Mahoney, J. T., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-basedview within the conversation of strategic management.Strategic Management Journal, 13(5), 363-380.
Marketo. (2010). The definitive guide to B2B social media: A marketworkbook. San Mateo, CA, USA.
104
McAdams, J. (2010). Human Resources 2.0. Accessed on July15, 2014 through www.hrworld.com: http://www.hrworld.com/features/hr-20-012808
Michaels, E., Handfield-Jones, H., & Axelrod, B. (2001). Thewar for talent. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
OReilly, T. (2010). What is Web 2.0? Accessed on July 15, 2014through http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html
Otter, T. (2009). The business impact of social computing: Real-world results for recruitment. Accessed on July 15, 2014through https://www.gartner.com/doc/1251236/busi-ness-impact-social-computing-realworld
Petty, R., & Cacioppo, J. (1986). The elaboration likelihoodmodel of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz, Advances in experi-mental social psychology (pp. 123-250), Orlando, FL: Aca-demic Press.
Powers, T., Advincula, D., Austin, M., Graiko, S., Brown, M.,& Snyder, J. (2012). Digital and social media in the pur-chase decision process: A special report from the adver-tising research foundation. Journal of Advertising Research,52(4), 479-489.
Poynter, R. (2011). Chatter matters. Marketing Research, 23(3),22-28.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence ofthe corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
Price, D. (1996). How marketing can sell your personnel prod-uct. Personnel Management, 2(12), 21.
Roberts, S., & Roach, T. (2009). Social networking websitesand human resource personnel: Suggestions for jobsearches. Business Communication Quarterly, 72(1), 110-114.
Ryan, A. M., & Tippins, N. T. (2004). Attracting and selecting:What psychological research tells us. Human ResourceManagement, 43(4), 305-318.
Rynes, S. L. (1991). Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire con-sequences: A call for new research directions. In M. D.Hough (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizationalpsychology,Volume 2, 2nd Edition. (pp. 399-444) Palo Alto,CA: Consulting Psychologists.
Saks, A. M., & Cronshaw, S. F. (1990). A process investigationof realistic job previews: Mediating variables and chan-
nels of communication. Journal of Organizational Behavior,11(3), 221-236.
Sanford, J. (2005). Making cents out of the hiring process.Strategic Finance, 87(6), 41.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. PersonnelPsychology, 40(3),437-453.
Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach toorganizational identity. The Academy of Management Re-view, 25(1). 43-62.
Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate socialperformance and organizational attractiveness to pro-spective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3),658-672.
Van Hoye, G., & Lievens, F. (2007). Social inuences on orga-nizational attractiveness: Investigating if and whenword-of-mouth matters. Journal of Applied Social Psychol-ogy, 37(9), 2024-2047.
Van-Hoye, G., & Saks, A. M. (2011). The instrumental-sym-bolic framework: Organisational image and attractive-ness of potential applicants and their companions at ajob fair. Applied Psychology:Aan International Review, 60(2),311-335.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer accep-tance and use of information technology: Extending theunified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MISQuarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
Wanous, J. P. (1973). Effects of a realistic job preview on jobacceptance, job attitudes and job survival. Journal of Ap-plied Psychology, 58(3), 327-332.
Wanous, J. P. (1975). Tell it like it is at realistic job previews.Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(4), 50-60.
Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (1992). Theoretical perspec-tives for strategic human resource management. Journalof Management, 18(2), 295-320.
Yang, H. D., & Mason, R. M. (1998). The internet, value chainvisibility, and learning. Hawaii: Thirty-First Annual Ha-waii International Conference on System Sciences.
Zottolli, M. A., & Wanous, J. P. (2000). Recruitment sourceresearch: Current and future directions. Human ResourceManagement Review, 10(4), 353-382.
Debolina Dutta is the Head of HR, India at VF Corporation,Bengaluru and is currently enrolled in the FPM Industryprogramme at IIM Indore. With a degree in Electrical Engi-neering from College of Engineering, Pune and a Post Gradu-ate Degree in Software Enterprise Management from IIM,
Bangalore, she has 22 years of work experience in the HR andSales domains.
e-mail: fi12debolinad@iimidr.ac.in
TWEET YOUR TUNE SOCIAL MEDIA, THE NEW PIED PIPER IN TALENT ACQUISITION