Post on 04-Jun-2018
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
1/27
Airline Schedule Optimization
(Fleet Assignment II)
Saba Neyshabouri
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
2/27
The Fleet Assignment Model
In order to develop the mathematical optimization model for
this problem, some modifications should be made to the
underlying time-space network:
Constructing a timespace network for each fleet type
Adding wraparound arcs for each airport to make the possibility of
keeping and aircraft at an airport overnight.
Adding the count time to the network to be able to keep track of the
total number of aircrafts of a fleet that are assigned.
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
3/27
Modified Time-Space Network
By incorporating mentioned modifications our network will
change to the following network:
Wraparound arc
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
4/27
Basic Fleet Assignment Model (FAM)
Based on the assumptions of the model, here is the list of
model parameters, data :
Decision Variables:
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
5/27
Basic FAM Model
Having defined the parameters and decision variables, the
Basic FAM model is as the following:
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
6/27
Basic FAM Model (description)
Objective Function
Tries to minimize the (Operational Cost- Generated revenue) of all theassignments of fleet type kto flight leg I
Constraints (assignment constraint):
States that each flight leg must be assigned exactly to one fleet type.
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
7/27
Basic FAM Model (description)
Constraints (Fleet balance constraint):
This constraints states that for each node and each fleet type : All the flights of type k that are arrived at n and are going to stay plus all the flights
originating from n that are going to fly out should be equal to the flights on the
ground that were waiting until the time at node n plus the number of flights that
are going to fly into n.
This constraint is the famous Flow Balance constraint in network flow models.
This constraint states that all the flights that are coming to a node should be leavingthat node at some point, or to state it differently, total number of aircrafts arriving
at an airport (of each type) is equal to the total number of departing aircrafts.
Not satisfying this constraint will cause the model to accumulate all the aircrafts at
one node.
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
8/27
Basic FAM Model (description)
Constraints (Fleet availability):
This constraints states that for each fleet type : The Sum of all of flights that has been on the ground during the count time plus all
the flights that has been assigned to a flight leg (flying) on that time should be less
than or equal to the total number of available aircrafts of that type.
These constraints which are similar to resource availability constraints, will make
the optimization model not to assign more than existing aircrafts to flight legs.
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
9/27
Basic FAM Model (description)
Constraints (Variable Definition):
This constraints states that for each fleet type and each arc : Assignment variables are 0-1 variables that shows the decision made about that
particular assignment.
Non-negativity constraints for flights on the ground which states that variable can
not assume negative values.
Note that for the flights on the ground there is no indication of the variable being
integer, while these variables are inherently integer! In some network problems, The integer constraints can be relaxed thanks to the
special structure of the problem, which makes the problem much easier to solve.
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
10/27
Basic FAM Weaknesses
Basic FAM is BASIC!
It captures some of the most important constraints of the
problem.
It is not covering constraints such as: Noise restrictions
Maintenance requirements
Gate restrictions
Crew considerations
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
11/27
Solving FAM
FAM is an integer, multi-commodity network flow problem with side
constraints.
It can be solved (not always easily and not for all the problems) using off-
the-shelf optimization software packages such as:
CPLEX
Xpress-MP
Here is an example of a problem size and solution time needed:
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
12/27
FAM and Impacts
Here are some examples of the impacts of using Fleet
Assignment Models (FAM) :
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
13/27
Extending Basic FAM
There are several shortcomings in Basic FAMs:
Spill costs: Revenue lost when the assigned aircraft for that flight
cannot accommodate all passenger demand.
Recapture costs: When an airline spills passengers from one flight leg
and then books them on other flights in the airlines network. Most FAMs consider only aggregate demand and average fare by flight
leg or by passenger itinerary which can compromise the accuracy of
the estimated spill costs.
Most FAMs assume that demand is static over the schedule period!
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
14/27
Example: Problems of Basic FAM
Consider the data for the FAM : (X-Z :connecting through Y)
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
15/27
Example: Problems of Basic FAM
Given the data provided in the tables:
Maximum possible revenue is :
Here is the table for each possible fleet assignmentcombination:
Assume fleeting I is selected: Demand for flight 1 is 150 (75+75) and demand for flight 2 is 225 (150+75) by thisfleeting, each flight leg will have capacity of 100 (capacity of aircraft A) so 50 passengers on flight 1 and 125 (225-100)passengers on flight 2 will spill.
Since the fare for X-Z is less than the sum of fares for X-Y and Y-Z The Revenue maximizing strategy is to spillpassengers from X-Z (50) with the cost of 15000 (50*300) and flight 1 will have enough capacity.
Because the local fare of Y-Z is less than X-Z, 75 passengers are spilled from Y-Z itinerary (with the cost of 16875) andsince 50 are already spilled from X-Z, flight 2 will be at capacity and total spill cost for this fleeting is15000+16875=31875
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
16/27
Example: Problems of Basic FAM
Following the same line of calculations, the spill cost for each
possible fleeting is shown in this table:
Considering the contributions of each fleeting, the optimalsolution for this small example is fleeting I.
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
17/27
Example: Problems of Basic FAM
If instead of considering network effects, we could calculate
spills on a leg-based fashion.
In this case, the objective is to minimize the spill cost for each
individual flight leg, independent of the effects on the other flights in
the network. The strategy is to spill passengers greedily in order of increasing fare,
until the number of passengers equals the capacity.
In our example, local passengers are always spilled in favor of keeping
the connecting passengers with a higher total fare so for the fleeting I:
50 X-Y passengers are spilled at fare 200 125 Y-Z passengers are spilled at fare of 225
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
18/27
Example: Problems of Basic FAM
Calculating the spill costs on a greedy leg-based approach will yieldthe following table:
Comparing to the network itinerary-based calculation:
The main reason for big differences is that greedy approach does notcapture flight leg interdependencies or network effects.
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
19/27
Considering Network Effects
For our example, it was easy to enumerate all the possible spill costs for
each fleeting, but for problems of real sizes (thousands of flight legs),
enumeration can be computationally very expensive if not impossible!
Researchers have developed mathematical models and optimization
approaches for large scale problems, and conclude that the benefits of
modeling network effects can be significant:
Network-based fleet assignment approach at AA has yielded annual improvements in
revenue for 0.54% to 0.77% (Jacobs et al., 1999).
Increased annual contributions from $30 to over $100 million have also been reported
as achievable at United Airlines when fleeting decisions are made using network-
enhanced FAM instead of a leg-based FAM (Barnhart et al., 2002).
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
20/27
Extended Fleet Assignment Problems
To capture network effects and extend Basic FAM to include
passenger spill decisions, following inputs to the problem
should be considered:
An airlines flight schedule
Itinerary-based passenger demand
Aircraft operating cost data
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
21/27
Extended FAM Modeling
To include the network effects in FAM we need to keep track
of number of passengers assigned to each itinerary in airlines
network.
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
22/27
Extended FAM Modeling
Data and variables:
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
23/27
Extended FAM (IFAM) Model
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
24/27
IFAM: Description
Objective function:
The objective is to minimize the sum of the operating cost of flying leg
I with aircraft type k for all flight legs and fleet types and the negative
of the total revenue.
Constraints:
First 3 constraints are the same as in Basic FAM model
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
25/27
IFAM: Description
Constraints:
Passenger flow and capacity constraints:
This constraint makes sure that for each aircraft in a fleet, the number ofpassengers assigned to that aircraft will not exceed its capacity.
Demand Constraint:
This constraint will limit the total number of passengers traveling on or spilled fromitinerary p to the unconstrained demand of p.
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
26/27
IFAM: Description
Constraints:
Passenger flow and capacity constraints:
These set of constraints will bound the variables to be positive and also fleet
assignment variables should be 0-1.
8/13/2019 Video Airline Schedule Optimization (Fleet Assignment II)
27/27
IFAM vs. FAM
Using IFAM will cause the problem size to grow which can
cause computation inefficiency or tractability issues, On the
other hand it will provide significant economic benefits thanks
to considering network effects.