Post on 05-Jan-2016
description
Updates on Oklahoma’s Accountability System
Jennifer Stegman,Assistant Superintendent
Karen Robertson,API Director
Office of Accountability and Assessments
Academic Performance IndexAPI
2 2
G rade s 3 through 8C R T M athem atics
E O I A lgebra I
M a tha p i
G rade s 3 through 8C R T R eadin g
E O I E nglish II
R e ad inga p i
O S T Pa p i
A P C re d ita p i
M ath R em ediatio n
R eading R em ediatio n
C o lleg e R e m e d ia tiona p i
P artic ipatio n
C om positeS core
A C Ta p i
A ca de m ic E xce lle n cea p i
A tte nd an cea p i
D ro po u t R a tea p i
G ra du a tio n R a tea p i
S ch oo l C o m ple tiona p i
A P I
Weighted
average
30%
10%
60%
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Academic Performance Index (API) Component Diagram 2007-2008
OSTP – Oklahoma School Testing Program
CRT – Criterion-Referenced Test
EOI – End-of-Instruction Test
AP – Advanced Placement
3
Point Contributions for High School and K-12 Districts
O k lah o m a S ch o o lT e s tin g P ro g ra m (O S T P )
0 -12 0 0 p o in ts
D ro po u t R a te0 -5 0 p o in ts
G ra du a tio n R a te0 -5 0 p o in ts
A tten da n ce R a te0 -5 0 p o in ts
S ch oo l C o m ple tion0 -1 50 po in ts
C o lle ge R em e d ia tio n R a tes0 -1 5 p o in ts
A d van ced P lace m e n t (A P )0 -4 5 p o in ts
A C T0 -9 0 p o in ts
A ca de m ic E xce lle n ce0 -1 50 po in ts
B ase lin e A PI0 -1500
4
Point Contributions for Elementary and Middle Schools,
K-6 and K-8 Districts
O k lah o m a S ch o o lT e s tin g P ro g ra m (O S T P )
0 -13 5 0 p o in ts
A tten da n ce R a te0 -1 50 po in ts
B ase lin e A PI0 -1500 po in ts
5
Adequate Yearly ProgressAYP
7
AYP• Federal Law• Includes all students• Focus on four criteria:
1. Math achievement
2. Reading achievement
3. Participation in state testing
4. Attendance and graduation rates
7 8
Math Performance
Target
Reading Performance
Target
*95% of Students Tested
**Additional Indicator
Performance Target
Mad
e Ad
equ
ate Yearly P
rogressFor each student group, did the school site or district meet the required performance targets?
yes yes yes yes
Did Not Make Adequate Yearly Progress
no no no no
AYP Determinations
*Participation rates calculated separately for math and reading. **Attendance or graduation rate, as applicable.
89
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)Components
Component Measure Benchmarks
2006-2007 2007-2008
Math Performance TargetMath api 932 932
Reading Performance TargetReading api 914 914
Percent of Students Tested
Students tested
Enrollment (Day of Test)
95% 95%
Additional Indicator
Graduation Rate
(High School)
67.8% 67.8%
Attendance
(Elementary & Middle School)
91.2% 91.2%
9 13
10
Student Groups1) All Students2) Regular Education Students3) Black4) American Indian5) Hispanic6) Asian7) White8) Other9) Economically Disadvantaged10) English language learners (ELL)11) Students with Individualized Education
Programs (IEP)
Race/Ethnicity and Economically Disadvantaged subgroups are disaggregated from ALL Students
14