Post on 14-Jul-2020
School of the Built Environment
1
UNIT 5 – DECISION MAKING
UNDER UNCERTAINTY
• This unit:
– Discusses the techniques to deal with uncertainties
School of the Built Environment
2
INTRODUCTION
• Few decisions in construction industry are made with certainty.
• Need to look at:
– The magnitudes of uncertainties
– How uncertainties might affect decisions
– How uncertainties influence subsequent outcomes of decisions
School of the Built Environment
3
TRADITIONAL STRATEGY
• A decision problem is characterized by decision alternatives, states of nature, and resulting payoffs.
• The decision alternatives are the different possible strategies the decision maker can employ.
• The states of nature refer to future events, not under the control of the decision maker, which may occur. States of nature should be defined so that they are mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive.
School of the Built Environment
4
PAYOFF TABLES
• The consequence resulting from a specific combination of a decision alternative and a state of nature is a payoff.
• A table showing payoffs for all combinations of decision alternatives and states of nature is a payoff table.
• Payoffs can be expressed in terms of profit, cost, time, distance or any other appropriate measure.
School of the Built Environment
5
EXPECTED VALUE APPROACH
• If probabilistic information regarding the states of nature is available, one may use the expected value (EV) approach.
• Here the expected return for each decision is calculated by summing the products of the payoff under each state of nature and the probability of the respective state of nature occurring.
• The decision yielding the best expected return is chosen.
School of the Built Environment
6
EXPECTED VALUE APPROACH
• The expected value of a decision alternative is the sum of weighted payoffs for the decision alternative.
• The expected value (EV) of decision alternative di is defined as:
where: N = the number of states of nature
P(Sj ) = the probability of state of nature sj
Vij = the payoff corresponding to decision alternative di and state of nature sj
School of the Built Environment
7
EXPECTED VALUE APPROACH
Example – lets consider the example of a housing contractor who builds residential houses. The contractor is planning for the number of houses to be built for the coming year. Assume that each house costs $15,000 and sells for $0,000 and that the probability distribution of the market demand in this area for new houses is know as:
P0 = Prob (demand = 00) = 0.2
P1 = Prob (demand = 10) = 0.4
P2 = Prob (demand = 20) = 0.3
P3 = Prob (demand = 30) = 0.1
How many houses should the contractor build for the year?
School of the Built Environment
8
EXPECTED VALUE APPROACH
What are the states of nature? # of houses sold
What are the decision alternatives? # of houses built
The payoff table is shown below.
Decision
(houses
to be
built)
State of nature
(Sold houses)
0 10 20 30
0 0 0 0 0
10 -150 350 350 350
20 -300 200 700 700
30 -450 50 550 1050
School of the Built Environment
9
EXPECTED VALUE APPROACH
The probability distribution of market demand is added to the payoff table to calculate the EV of each decision
The maximum EV is when the contractor builds 20 houses.
Decision
(houses
to be
built)
State of nature
(Sold houses)
0 10 20 30 EV
0 0 0 0 0 0
10 -150 350 350 350 250
20 -300 200 700 700 300
30 -450 50 550 1050 200
Prob DD 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1
School of the Built Environment
10
EXPECTED VALUE OF
PERFECT INFORMATION
• Frequently information is available which can improve the probability estimates for the states of nature.
• The expected value of perfect information (EVPI) is the increase in the expected profit that would result if one knew with certainty which state of nature would occur.
• The EVPI is the price that one would be willing to pay in order to gain access to perfect information.
• The EVPI provides an upper bound on the expected value of any sample or survey information.
School of the Built Environment
11
EXPECTED VALUE OF
PERFECT INFORMATION
• EVPI Calculation
– Step 1:
Determine the optimal return corresponding to each state of nature.
– Step 2:
Compute the expected value of these optimal returns.
– Step 3:
Subtract the EV of the optimal decision from the amount determined in step (2).
School of the Built Environment
12
EXPECTED VALUE OF
PERFECT INFORMATION
Decision
(houses
to be
built)
State of nature
(Sold houses)
0 10 20 30 EV
0 0 0 0 0 0
10 -150 350 350 350 250
20 -300 200 700 700 300
30 -450 50 550 1050 200
Prob DD 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.1
Optimal 0 350 700 1050 455
EVPI = 455 – 300 = 155
School of the Built Environment
13
DECISION TREES
• A decision tree is a chronological representation of the decision problem.
• They provide a highly effective structure within which one can lay out options and investigate the possible outcomes of choosing those options.
• They also help you to form a balanced picture of the risks and rewards associated with each possible course of action.
School of the Built Environment
14
DECISION TREES
• A decision tree is read from left to right.
• Each decision tree has two types of nodes:
– round nodes correspond to the states of nature, outcome or chance event
– square nodes correspond to the decision alternatives
• Lines connecting the nodes show the direction of influence
School of the Built Environment
15
DECISION TREES
• The branches leaving each round node represent the different states of nature while the branches leaving each square node represent the different decision alternatives.
• At the end of each limb of a tree are the payoffs attained from the series of branches making up that limb.
School of the Built Environment
16
DECISION TREES
Decision node
Decision alternatives:1. Develop temp sensor2. Develop pressure sensor3. Do neither
State of nature nodes
States of nature:1. Success 2. Failure
Payoffs
School of the Built Environment
17
DECISION TREES
WITHOUT PROBABILITIES
• Three commonly used criteria for decision making when probability information regarding the likelihood of the states of nature is unavailable are:
– the optimistic (Maximax) approach
– the conservative (Maximin) approach
– the minimax regret approach
School of the Built Environment
18
OPTIMISTIC APPROACH
MAXIMAX
• Used by an optimistic decision maker.
• The decision with the largest possible payoff is chosen.
• If the payoff table was in terms of costs, the decision with the lowest cost would be chosen.
School of the Built Environment
19
CONSERVATIVE APPROACH
MAXIMIN
• Used by a conservative decision maker.
• For each decision the minimum payoff is listed and then the decision corresponding to the maximum of these minimum payoffs is selected. (Hence, the minimum possible payoff is maximized.)
• If the payoff was in terms of costs, the maximum costs would be determined for each decision and then the decision corresponding to the minimum of these maximum costs is selected. (Hence, the maximum possible cost is minimized.)
School of the Built Environment
20
MINIMAX REGRET APPROACH
• Requires the construction of a regret table or an opportunity loss table.
• This is done by calculating for each state of nature the difference between each payoff and the largest payoff for that state of nature.
• Then, using this regret table, the maximum regret for each possible decision is listed.
• The decision chosen is the one corresponding to the minimum of the maximum regrets
School of the Built Environment
21
EXAMPLE 1
• Consider the following problem with three decision alternatives and three states of nature with the following payoff table representing profits
School of the Built Environment
22
EXAMPLE 1
d1
d2
d3
S1
S1
S1
S2
S2
S2
S3
S3
S3
4
4
-2
0
3
-1
1
5
-3
School of the Built Environment
23
EXAMPLE 1 - MAXIMAX
• An optimistic decision maker would use the optimistic (maximax) approach. We choose the decision that has the largest single value in the payoff table.
Maximax decision Maximax
payoff
School of the Built Environment
24
EXAMPLE 1 - MAXIMAX
d1
d2
d3
S1
S1
S1
S2
S2
S2
S3
S3
S3
4
4
-2
0
3
-1
1
5
-3
5
3
4
School of the Built Environment
25
EXAMPLE 1 - MAXIMIN
• A conservative decision maker would use the conservative (maximin) approach. List the minimum payoff for each decision. Choose the decision with the maximum of these minimum payoffs
Maximin decision
Maximin payoff
Minimum Payoff
-2
-1
-3
School of the Built Environment
26
EXAMPLE 1 - MAXIMIN
d1
d2
d3
S1
S1
S1
S2
S2
S2
S3
S3
S3
4
4
-2
0
3
-1
1
5
-3
-3
-1
-2
School of the Built Environment
27
EXAMPLE 1 – MINIMAX REGRET
• For the minimax regret approach, first compute a regret table by subtracting each payoff in a column from the largest payoff in that column.
States of nature
Decision S1 S2 S3
d1 4 4 -2
d2 0 3 -1
d3 1 5 -3
Column Max 4 5 -1
Regret table S1 S2 S3
d1 0 1 1
d2 4 2 0
d3 3 0 2
=-1-(-2)= 4 - 0
School of the Built Environment
28
EXAMPLE 1 – MINIMAX REGRET
• For each decision list the maximum regret. Choose the decision with the minimum of these values.
.
Regret table S1 S2 S3 Max regretd1 0 1 1 1d2 4 2 0 4d3 3 0 2 3
Minimax regret
Minimax regret
decision
School of the Built Environment
29
EXAMPLE 1 - MINIMAX REGRET
d1
d2
d3
S1
S1
S1
S2
S2
S2
S3
S3
S3
4
4
-2
0
3
-1
1
5
-3
3
4
1
School of the Built Environment
30
DECISION TREES
WITH PROBABILITIES
• Decision trees are also used for displaying decision problems with uncertainty.
• If probabilistic information regarding the states of nature is available, use the expected value (EV) approach.
• The EV for each decision is calculated by summing the products of the payoff under each state of nature and the probability of the respective state of nature occurring.
• The decision yielding the best EV is chosen.
School of the Built Environment
31
EXAMPLE 2
Company ABC has developed a new line of products. Top managementis attempting to decide on the appropriate marketing and productionstrategy. 3 strategies are being considered: A (Aggressive), B (basic) andC (Cautious). The market conditions under study are denoted by S(Strong) or W (Weak). Management's best estimate of the net profits (in$, mil) in each case is given in the following payoff table.
Management's estimates of the probabilities of a strong or a weak market are 0.45 and 0.55 respectively. Which strategy should be chosen.
DecisionState of nature
S W
A 30 -8
B 20 7
C 15 10
School of the Built Environment
32
SOLUTION 2
A
B
C
P=0.4530
-8
20
7
15
10
P=0.45
P=0.45
P=0.55
P=0.55
P=0.55
EV=9.1
EV=12.85
EV=12.25
School of the Built Environment
33
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
• Other critical points of the studied decision can be concluded from the decision tree analysis.
• Using the same facts from example 2:
EVA = 30*P(S) – 8*P(W); since P(S) + P(W) =1, then
EVA = 30*P(S) – 8*[1-P(S)]; which simplifies into
EVA = 38P(S) – 8; which is the equation of a straight line
School of the Built Environment
34
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
• Similarly solving for EVB & EVC gives:
EVB = 7 + 13P(S); and
EVC = 10 + 5P(S)
• All 3 equations can be plotted with EV as the y-axis and P(S) as the x-axis.
• The resultant graph is shown in next slide
School of the Built Environment
35
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
EV
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
EVA EVB EVC
P(S)
C strategyP(S) < 0.38
B strategyA strategyP(S) > 0.6
School of the Built Environment
36
CLASS EXERCISE 1
An investment performance is significantly affected by twovariables: the economic environment and whether acompeting building is developed. The cash flow under thevarious scenarios is as follows:
School of the Built Environment
37
CLASS EXERCISE 1
Through an assessment of the economic environment, theprobability estimates of the likelihood of each of the 3 economicsituations under consideration is:
The conditional probability of whether the competing building willbe built under the 3 economic conditions is estimated as follows:
What is the expected value of the investment?
School of the Built Environment
38
CLASS EXERCISE 2
Burger Prince Restaurant is considering opening a new
restaurant on Main Street. It has three different models, each
with a different seating capacity. Burger Prince estimates that the
average number of customers per hour will be 80, 100, or 120.
The payoff table for the three models is:
Given that the probability of S1, S2 and S3 is 0.4, 0.2 and 0.4
respectively, calculate the expected value for each decision & the
expected value of perfect information.
School of the Built Environment
39
CLASS EXERCISE 3
A contractor is concerned about the capacity of the existing
dewatering system to be used in a new project to keep the site
dry in order to prevent progress delay. Additional pumps will
add costs to the budget, and progress delay will cause
penalties to the contractor. Three scenarios (S1, S2 and S3)
are expected to make the water level in the construction site
high. S1 (the rain will be < 6 inch in 12 hour period) has the
probability of 0.5, S2 (the rain will reach 6 inch only one time in
12 hour period) has the probability of 0.3, and S3 (the rain will
reach 6 inch many times in 12 hour period) has the probability
of 0.2. The cost of pumps installation and the penalties for any
delay are shown in the following table.
School of the Built Environment
40
CLASS EXERCISE 3
A. Draw a decision tree to represent this problem
B. Which alternative is the best choice? And Why?
Alternative S1 S2 S3
Install 15,000 15,000 65,000
Do nothing 0 20,00 100,000
School of the Built Environment
41
CLASS EXERCISE 4
Two pumping systems “A” and ”B” are proposed for supplying
water to a residential area. The construction costs for system
“A” is $250,000 and for system “B” is $750,000. if partial failure
occurs, it is expected that the damage cost for system “A” is
$80,000 and for system “B is $15,000. If complete failure
occurs, it is expected that the damage cost for system “A” is
$450,000 and for system “B” is $400,000. the probabilities of
partial and complete failures are 5% and 1% respectively.
a. Draw a decision tree to represent this problem
b. Which alternative is the best choice? And Why?
School of the Built Environment
42
CLASS EXERCISE 5
Adrian is a developer and must build factories for the coming
year. Construction for the factories must be in quantities of 20.
The cost per factory is $70 if they build 20, $67 if they build 40,
$65 if they build 60, and $64 if they build 80. The factory will
be sold for $100 each. Any factory left over at the end of the
season can be sold (for certain) at $45 each. If Adrian run out
of factories during the year, then they will suffer a loss of
"goodwill" among their customers. They estimate this goodwill
loss to be $5 per customer who was unable to buy a factory.
Adrian estimate that the demand for factory this season will be
10, 30, 50, or 70 factory with probabilities of 0.2, 0.4, 0.3, and
0.1 respectively.
School of the Built Environment
43
CLASS EXERCISE 5
a. What are the decisions facing Adrian?
b. What are the states of nature?
c. Construct the payoff table.
d. What would be Adrian’s decision based on Maximax,
Maximin and Minimax Regret criterion?
School of the Built Environment
44
THE END
Any questions?