Post on 26-Oct-2020
1
PMBelCOL PEmails
From: Spink, Thomas E [tespink@tva.gov]Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 2:12 PMTo: Mallecia HoodCc: Neil Haggerty; Sterdis, Andrea LynnSubject: LTR 22 - Correct AttachmenrtAttachments: ER Ltr 22 - consolidated Attachments.pdf
Mallecia, Please find attached the PDF with all the attachments included. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused. Thomas E. Spink Licensing Project Manager Nuclear Generation Development 1101 Market Street, LP 5A Chattanooga, TN 37402 423-751-7062 Fax: (423)-751-6509
Hearing Identifier: Bellefonte_COL_Public_EX Email Number: 497 Mail Envelope Properties (B648F67990B15146B8646584D20B8DD104E9FF1B) Subject: LTR 22 - Correct Attachmenrt Sent Date: 8/20/2008 2:12:28 PM Received Date: 8/20/2008 2:16:00 PM From: Spink, Thomas E Created By: tespink@tva.gov Recipients: "Neil Haggerty" <neilhaggerty@comcast.net> Tracking Status: None "Sterdis, Andrea Lynn" <alsterdis@tva.gov> Tracking Status: None "Mallecia Hood" <Mallecia.Hood@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None Post Office: TVACOCXVS2.main.tva.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 322 8/20/2008 2:16:00 PM ER Ltr 22 - consolidated Attachments.pdf 3206298 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)A TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
FLOW FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE FOR FLOW PAST THE BLN
Tennessee Valley Authority
Flow Frequency Percentagefor Flow Past the BLN
(1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)AFlow Frequency Percentage for Flow Past the BLN
93.4% 93.3% 92.7%
89.7%
84.9%
19.2%
3.5%
0.9% 0.2%1.2%3.5%
5.9%6.5%6.6%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
> 0 > 100 > 1000 > 5000 > 10,000 > 50,000 > 100,000 > 150,000 > 200,000
Flow Rate (cfs)
Perc
ent o
f Tim
e A
bove
Lis
ted
Flow
Normal FlowReverse Flow
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)A
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)B TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
TYPICAL BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE DURING REVERSAL
Tennessee Valley Authority
Typical BLN Flow Rate Response During Reversal
(1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)BTypical BLN Flow Rate Response During Reversal
-20,000
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Hours
Flow
Rat
e (c
fs)
>0/<2 hrs>1/<3 hrs>2/<4 hrs>3/<5 hrs>4/<6 hrs
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)B
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)C TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
REVERSE FLOW OCCURRENCE AND DURATION AT THE BLN (1978 – 2007)
Tennessee Valley Authority
Reverse Flow Occurrence and Duration at the BLN (1978 - 2007)
(1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)CReverse Flow Occurrence and Duration
at the BLN (1978-2007)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
>0/<2 hrs >1/<3 hrs >2/<4 hrs >3/<5 hrs >4/<6 hrs
Duration of Occurrence
Num
ber o
f Occ
urre
nces
(197
8 - 2
007)
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)C
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)D TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
TYPICAL BLN LOW FLOW RATE RESPONSE DURING REVERSAL
Tennessee Valley Authority
Typical BLN Low Flow Rate Response During Reversal
(1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)DTypical BLN Low Flow Rate Response During Reversal
-1,000
-800
-600
-400
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Hours
Flow
Rat
e (c
fs)
>0/<2 hrs>1/<3 hrs>2/<4 hrs>3/<5 hrs>4/<6 hrs
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)D
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)E TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (JUNE 29 – 30, 2002),COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES
Tennessee Valley Authority
BLN Flow Rate Response (June 29 - 30, 2002) Compared to
Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases(1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)EBLN Flow Rate Response (June 29-30, 2002)
Compared to Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases
-20,000
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
179.0
4
179.1
2
179.2
1
179.2
9
179.3
7
179.4
6
179.5
4
179.6
2
179.7
1
179.7
9
179.8
7
179.9
6
180.0
4
180.1
2
180.2
1
180.2
9
180.3
7
180.4
6
180.5
4
180.6
2
180.7
1
180.7
9
180.8
7
180.9
6
Julian Day, 2002
Flow
Rat
e (c
fs)
Flow Past BLNNickajack ReleasesGuntersville Releases
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)E
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)F TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (MAY 2 – 3, 1983), COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES
Tennessee Valley Authority
BLN Flow Rate Response (May 2 - 3, 1983) Compared to
Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases (1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)FBLN Flow Rate Response (May 2-3, 1983)
Compared to Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
123.8
8
123.9
6
124.0
4
124.1
3
124.2
1
124.2
9
124.3
8
124.4
6
124.5
4
124.6
3
124.7
1
124.7
9
124.8
8
124.9
6
125.0
4
125.1
3
125.2
1
125.2
9
125.3
8
125.4
6
125.5
4
125.6
3
125.7
1
125.7
9
Julian Day, 1983
Flow
Rat
e (c
fs)
Flow Past BLNNickajack ReleasesGuntersville Releases
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)F
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)G TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (AUGUST 16 – 17, 1988),COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES
Tennessee Valley Authority
BLN Flow Rate Response (August 16 - 17, 1988) Compared to
Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases (1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)GBLN Flow Rate Response (August 16-17, 1988)
Compared to Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases
-30,000
-20,000
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
228.0
0
228.0
8
228.1
7
228.2
5
228.3
3
228.4
2
228.5
0
228.5
8
228.6
7
228.7
5
228.8
3
228.9
2
229.0
0
229.0
8
229.1
7
229.2
5
229.3
3
229.4
2
229.5
0
229.5
8
229.6
7
229.7
5
229.8
3
229.9
2
Julian Day, 1988
Flow
Rat
e (c
fs)
Flow Past BLNNickajack ReleasesGuntersville Releases
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)G
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)H TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (SEPTEMBER 3 – 4, 1998),COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES
Tennessee Valley Authority
BLN Flow Rate Response (September 3 - 4, 1998) Compared to
Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases (1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)HBLN Flow Rate Response (September 3-4, 1998)
Compared to Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases
-20,000
0
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
245.0
0
245.0
8
245.1
7
245.2
5
245.3
3
245.4
2
245.5
0
245.5
8
245.6
7
245.7
5
245.8
3
245.9
2
246.0
0
246.0
8
246.1
7
246.2
5
246.3
3
246.4
2
246.5
0
246.5
8
246.6
7
246.7
5
246.8
3
246.9
2
Julian Day, 1998
Flow
Rat
e (c
fs)
Flow Past BLNNickajack ReleasesGuntersville Releases
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)H
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)I TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (JUNE 20 – 21, 2006),COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES
Tennessee Valley Authority
BLN Flow Rate Response (June 20 - 21, 2006) Compared to
Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases (1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)IBLN Flow Rate Response (June 20-21, 2006)
Compared to Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases
-20,000
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
170.0
0
170.0
8
170.1
7
170.2
5
170.3
3
170.4
2
170.5
0
170.5
8
170.6
7
170.7
5
170.8
3
170.9
2
171.0
0
171.0
8
171.1
7
171.2
5
171.3
3
171.4
2
171.5
0
171.5
8
171.6
7
171.7
5
171.8
3
171.9
2
Julian Day, 2006
Flow
Rat
e (c
fs)
Flow Past BLNNickajack ReleasesGuntersville Releases
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)I
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (JANUARY 2 - 3, 2007), COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES
Tennessee Valley Authority
BLN Flow Rate Response (January 2 - 3, 2007) Compared to
Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases (1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)JBLN Flow Rate Response (January 2-3, 2007)
Compared to Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
2.00
2.08
2.17
2.25
2.33
2.42
2.50
2.58
2.67
2.75
2.83
2.92
3.00
3.08
3.17
3.25
3.33
3.42
3.50
3.58
3.67
3.75
3.83
3.92
Julian Day, 2007
Flow
Rat
e (c
fs)
Flow Past BLNNickajack ReleasesGuntersville Releases
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)J
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)K TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (JUNE 25 – 26, 2007),COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES
Tennessee Valley Authority
BLN Flow Rate Response (June 25 - 26, 2007) Compared to
Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases (1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)KBLN Flow Rate Response (June 25-26, 2007)
Compared to Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases
-20,000
-10,000
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
175.8
3
175.9
2
176.0
0
176.0
8
176.1
7
176.2
5
176.3
3
176.4
2
176.5
0
176.5
8
176.6
7
176.7
5
176.8
3
176.9
2
177.0
0
177.0
8
177.1
7
177.2
5
177.3
3
177.4
2
177.5
0
177.5
8
177.6
7
177.7
5
Julian Day, 2007
Flow
Rat
e (c
fs)
Flow Past BLNNickajack ReleasesGuntersville Releases
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)K
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
BLN FLOW RATE RESPONSE (OCTOBER 25 – 26, 2007),COMPARED TO GUNTERSVILLE AND NICKAJACK DAM RELEASES
Tennessee Valley Authority
BLN Flow Rate Response (October 25 - 26, 2007) Compared to
Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases (1 page)
Attachment 5.3-3(1)LBLN Flow Rate Response (October 25-26, 2007)
Compared to Guntersville and Nickajack Dam Releases
-15,000
-10,000
-5,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
298.0
0
298.0
8
298.1
7
298.2
5
298.3
3
298.4
2
298.5
0
298.5
8
298.6
7
298.7
5
298.8
3
298.9
2
299.0
0
299.0
8
299.1
7
299.2
5
299.3
3
299.4
2
299.5
0
299.5
8
299.6
7
299.7
5
299.8
3
299.9
2
Julian Day, 2007
Flow
Rat
e (c
fs)
Flow Past BLNNickajack ReleasesGuntersville Releases
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)L
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)M TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
BLN ER FIGURE 2.3-5 FLOW FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE FOR FLOW PAST THE BLN
REV. 1
Tennessee Valley Authority
BLN ER Figure 2.3-5 Flow Frequency Percentage
for Flow past the BLN (1 page)
Rev. 1
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)M
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)N TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
BLN ER FIGURE 2.3-6 REVERSE FLOW OCCURRENCE AND DURATION AT THE BLN (1978 – 2007)
REV. 1
Tennessee Valley Authority
BLN ER Figure 2.3-6 Reverse Flow Occurrence and Duration at
the BLN (1978 - 2007) (1 page)
Rev. 1
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(1)N
ATTACHMENT 5.3-3(3) TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
CORMIX INPUT FILES (CD-ROM, RUN DATE 08-01-2008)
Tennessee Valley Authority
CORMIX Input Files (CD-ROM, run date 08-01-2008)
ATTACHMENT 5.3-5A TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
ER FIGURE 5.3-3 100 % EFFLUENT FLOW THROUGH BOTH DIFFUSERS – 7Q10 RIVER FLOW (39.2ºF)
REV. 1
Tennessee Valley Authority
ER Figure 5.3-3 100% Effluent Flow through Both Diffusers
7Q10 River Flow (39.2ºF) (1 page)
Rev. 1
ATTACHMENT 5.3-5A
ATTACHMENT 5.3-5B TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
ER FIGURE 5.3-4 100 % EFFLUENT FLOW THROUGH BOTH DIFFUSERS – 7Q10 RIVER FLOW (90ºF)
REV. 1
Tennessee Valley Authority
ER Figure 5.3-4 100% Effluent Flow through Both Diffusers
7Q10 River Flow (90ºF) (1 page)
Rev. 1
ATTACHMENT 5.3-5B
ATTACHMENT 5.3-5C TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
ER FIGURE 5.3-5 100 % EFFLUENT FLOW THROUGH BOTH DIFFUSERS –
MAXIMUM REVERSE RIVER FLOW (39.2ºF) REV. 1
Tennessee Valley Authority
ER Figure 5.3-5 100% Effluent Flow through Both Diffusers
Maximum Reverse River Flow (39.2ºF) (1 page)
Rev. 1
ATTACHMENT 5.3-5C