The Differential Outcomes Effect : Teaching Verbal Operants

Post on 24-Feb-2016

100 views 0 download

Tags:

description

The Differential Outcomes Effect : Teaching Verbal Operants. Michelle Olson, M.S, Mark Harvey, Ph.D, BCBA Ansley Hodges, M.S., BCBA, Eb Blakely, Ph.D, BCBA-D Florida Institute of Technology and QuestKids. Typical Procedure. Differential Outcomes Procedure. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Differential Outcomes Effect : Teaching Verbal Operants

The Differential Outcomes Effect: Teaching Verbal Operants

Michelle Olson, M.S, Mark Harvey, Ph.D, BCBAAnsley Hodges, M.S., BCBA, Eb Blakely, Ph.D, BCBA-D

Florida Institute of Technology and QuestKids

Typical Procedure

Differential Outcomes ProcedureDifferent reinforcers in a discrimination task, correlated with each kind of response

Increase rate of acquisition and/or maintain higher steady state performance

Differential Outcomes Effect

Lab Studies With Nonhumans:Variety of discrimination Paradigms

Two Choice Discrimination Experiments

Two-Choice Procedure: Correlated Outcomes

Light

Light

Two-Choice Control Procedure:Uncorrelated Outcomes

Light

Light

Two-Choice Control Procedure:Confound????

1. Two reinforcers2. Correlated outcomes

Food Food Food WaterDOETypical

Human Application: Correlated Outcomes

Human Application:Uncorrelated Outcomes

• Two boys with autism – 8 and 5 years old• QuestKids Academy –

Experiment 1: Extension to Verbal Operants

Experiment 1 Design

• Alternating Treatments

• Dependent Variable:– % correct of intraverbal responses

• Independent Variable:– Correlated vs. Uncorrelated outcomes

Baseline Procedure

General Treatment Procedure

Intraverbal TasksCorrelated Task

Uncorrelated Task

Video

• Show video Clip

Santi: IntraverbalsCorrelated Task

Uncorrelated Task

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 330

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

BL Tx

Uncorrelated

Correlated

Maint

Results Experiment 1: Santi

Josh: IntraverbalsCorrelated Task

Uncorrelated Task

Results Experiment 1: Josh

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 550

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Sessions

Perc

ent

Corr

ect

BL Tx Maint

CorrelatedUncorrelated

Decreased # experimenters

Experiment 2: Extension to Intraverbals and Tacts

• Two different boys with autism both 8 years old

• QuestKids Academy –

Experiment 2

• Design:– Alternating Treatments– Multiple baseline across verbal operants

• Dependent Variable:– % correct responses– Note: 100% and 97%, IOA respectively

• Independent Variable:– Correlated vs. Uncorrelated outcomes

Caliel: Tacts

Correlated Task

Uncorrelated Task

Caliel: IntraverbalsCorrelated Task

Uncorrelated Task

ResultsExperiment 2: Caliel

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 440

102030405060708090

100 Intraverbals

Perc

ent

Corr

ect

BL Tx Maint

Correlated Uncorrelated

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243440

102030405060708090

100

Tacts

Sessions

Perc

ent

Corr

ect

Austin: Tacts

Correlated Task

Uncorrelated Task

Austin: Intraverbals

Correlated Task

Uncorrelated Task

ResultsExperiment 2: Austin

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 360

102030405060708090

100Intraverbals

Sessions

Perc

ent

Corr

ect

0102030405060708090

100

Tacts

Perc

ent

Corr

ect

BL Tx Maint

Uncorrelated

Correlated

Discussion of Austin

Why was uncorrelated more effective?

Correlated Task

Summary of ResultsParticipant Intraverbal

(DOE)Tact

(DOE)Santi

Josh

Caliel x

Austin x x

Discussion

• DOE procedure has promise in teaching verbal operants, especially intraverbals

• Task difficulty critical element

• Use when traditional procedures don’t work

Discussion

–Future Directions• Intraverbals replications • Recall / Comprehension (DTMS)• Different ages / abilities

End

For this PowerPoint and references

Website: www.fitaba.comEmail: eblakely@questinc.org

Differential Outcomes Effect

Match-to-Sample

Traditional Discrimination Training

Assay: Match-to-sample

Sample stimulus

Choice stimuli

Food Food

DOE Procedure

Sample stimulus

Food Drink

DOE Procedure

Sample stimulus

Food Drink

DOE Control Procedures

Sample stimulus

.5 Food/.5 Drink

.5 Food/.5 Drink

Uncorrelated

Sample stimulus

Food DrinkCorrelated

DOE Procedure: Application

A B

SD: “Point to A”

Candy Soda

SD: “Point to B”

Academic Tasks

DOE Procedure: Application

“Sandwich”

“My friend Will”

SD: “What did you just eat?”

Candy Soda

SD: “Who did you just talk to?”

Recall Tasks

Exercises

The DOE is an effect in which different _________ are used for different ________ in a discrimination task.

What is the proper control procedure in a DOE study?

Pick a task that you are teaching, and design a DOE procedure for it.