Post on 15-Jul-2018
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
The CFMU Network Operations
2011
Directorate Network Management
Network Management Functions
• Integrated route network design
• Central function for frequencies
• SSR code allocation coordination
• Operations – incl. ATFM
Deployment coordination
Training Network Technical
Systems
Airspace
AIS Data Mgt Safety Airports
Operations
Planning
Network Operations
Management
Performance Monitoring
Network
Operations
ATM Structure in Europe
One single
ATFCM
System over
Europe
41 States
59 En-route centres = 1750 Sectors
1348 Aircraft Operators
450 Airports
59 FMPs
4000+ connected end-users
Peaks 34 400+ flights a day
10 000 000+ flights a year
Airspace data management
• To achieve this common view, all 40 countries which form part of the
CFMU area of operations provide us their airspace data information.
• Static data such as air traffic control (ATC) sector boundaries and air
routes (such as the maximum capacity for each airport and air traffic
control sector)
• Dynamic data showing the availability of airspace, default ATC
Capacities (for instance, number of runways available, availability of air
traffic controllers…) and air-route availability based on foreseen military
airspace usage.
CACD
Network view on planned & current status of airspace
Access to archived data for post ops
Access to draft data for simulation/DDR
Digital NOTAM + Real Time data
AUP/UUP
NoN AIP +ATM data
AIP data
EAD
ADR
seamless access
from various sources
Airspace Data Repository
Flight Planning
• “Network Operations" : Single entry point which collects all
flight plans in Europe.
• 2 central units – Brussels and Bretigny (France)
• Distribution to all ACCs in CFMU area
• Establishment of accurate demand picture for ATC and ATFCM
Flight Planning
Aircraft
Operators
(AOs)
/
Air Traffic
Services
Reporting
Offices
(AROs)
Air
Traffic
Control
(ATC)
IFPU1 IFPU2
Brussels Brétigny
IFPS
ENV
ORM
FPL FPL
ATC FPL
Changes
Fli
gh
t P
lan
s
RPL
© EUROCONTROL1997 - Central Flow Management Unit
URB\SEZ\085\1771\20.03.06
ATFCM System
ETFMS
EAD
23% RPL
+- 62 000 MESSAGES/DAY
+-30 000 flights
IFPU1 IFPU2
Brussels (B) Brétigny (F)
45% 55%
ATFCM
• A pan-European network view shared with the local units responsible for air traffic control and devising solutions that optimise the handling of traffic flows according to the available capacity.
• This is done both on the day of the flight and by anticipating operations months in advance, by establishing a single network operations plan collectively agreed.
• Events that impact air traffic every day, whether they are planned - such as sporting events - or unpredictable, such as adverse weather conditions, aviation crises.
Feedback Feedback
Strategic Flow & Capacity Planning
Optimised Capacity Management
Tactical Flow &
Capacity Management
Harmonised
Planning
considering :
- Traffic Demand
- Airspace Structure
- ATC Capabilities
- Airport Capabilities
Optimised Daily
Plan
and
anticipation of
events in order to
maintain the
network stability.
Reaction to real-
time events to
minimise
disruptions impact
and/or to take
benefit of
opportunities.
1
year
1 week real-time
Real-Time
Operations
- ATC
- ASM
- Airport
- AOs
Resources
- Airspace
- ATC
- Airport
Feedback
Traffic
Forecast
Feedback
© EUROCONTROL2004 - Central Flow Management Unit
URB\SEZ\14.03.06
ATFCM
• Strategic phase - From several months until one week before the flight.
• Assist the Air Navigation Service Providers (ANSPs) to predict what capacity they will need to provide in each of their air traffic control centres. In addition, a routing scheme is prepared – a structure of air routes across Europe designed to balance the air traffic flows and maximise capacity.
• Pre-tactical phase - In the six days before the flight
• Coordinate and define the daily plan and inform Aircraft Operators and ATC units about the ATFCM measures that will be in force in European airspace on the following day. Optimise available capacity to meet forecast demand, manage demand to minimise delay and cost, and to publish the agreed plan for the day of operations after a collaborative decision making process.
• Tactical phase - On the day of the flight
• Optimisation of the capacity according to the demand across Europe, and delay management where aircraft are affected by a regulation in order to offer alternatives and minimise delay. Flights taking place on that day receive the benefit of ATFCM, which includes the allocation of individual aircraft departure times, re-routings to avoid bottlenecks and alternative flight profiles to maximise efficiency.
ATFCM Co-ordination - FMPs
CFMU States (ATFM Area)
Cooperating States
(ATFM Adjacent Areas)
FI
IS
GE
AM AZ
EE
UA
MD
TR
CY
FR
LV
LT
BE
NL DE
GB IE BY
RO
AL
MK BG
GR
CH
IT
AT HU
ES PT
DK
NO SE
PL
CZ
MT
BA
MA
DZ TN
SY
IQ IR
KZ
RU
SK
LB
IL
SI
HR
HE
RS ME
Before After
Such solutions require
Network Wide implementation required by both ANSPs and AOs
Network ASM ATFCM Solution
Capacity
ATFCM Network
Operations
Capacity
Emissions Flight
Efficiency
ATFM
Delay
Network Operations
Airport/TMA ATFM Delay Repartition in 2011
AIRPORT
WEATHER
49%
AIRPORT
INFRASTRUCTURE
31%
AIRPORT ATC
CAPACITY
20%
En-Route ATFM Delay Repartition in 2011
EN ROUTE
WEATHER &
EXTERNAL
DISRUPTIONS,
0.13
EN ROUTE
EVENTS, 0.03
EN ROUTE ATC
DISRUPTIONS,
0.05
EN ROUTE ATC
CAPACITY, 0.55
EN ROUTE ATC
STAFFING, 0.25
Breakdow n of All Delay Causes per Flight
8.512.2
0.7
1.5
0.9
1.0
3.0
6.0
9.0
12.0
15.0
2010 2011
Avera
ge D
ela
y p
er
Flight (m
in)
ATFM Ot her
ATFM En- Rout e Primary
Ot her
Ot her - 3 0 %
10.1 minA TF M - 53 %
14.7 min
ECAC "Effective Capacity" Evolution Per Month 2005-2011
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
"E
ffe
cti
ve
Ca
pa
cit
y"
flig
hts
pe
r d
ay
(th
ou
sa
nd
s)
2005 Effective Capacity 25.2 25.5 25.2 27.3 25.8 26.0 25.5 26.6 27.3 25.6 25.9 25.0
2006 Effective Capacity 25.6 25.8 24.7 25.7 27.6 26.9 25.1 27.5 28.4 28.3 28.9 26.4
2007 Effective Capacity 26.7 27.3 27.5 27.9 28.3 26.7 27.0 29.0 29.3 28.6 26.9 24.7
2008 Effective Capacity 24.1 24.8 25.0 28.1 27.5 27.5 26.8 26.7 28.2 28.1 27.1 24.0
2009 Effective Capacity 24.2 27.3 27.5 28.5 28.5 27.5 26.3 27.7 29.1 27.0 25.1 21.7
2010 Effective Capacity 22.6 22.3 26.4 23.3 24.8 25.5 24.1 25.8 26.0 25.0 26.4 20.0
2011 Effective Capacity 25.4 27.2 28.2 27.6 28.2 27.8 27.4 27.8 28.0 26.8 28.1 26.7
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Additional Pan European and Crisis
management Functions
• SAFA – Safety Alert of Foreign Aircraft
• AMON – Arrival Monitoring Tool
• CSST - Call Sign Similarity Management Cell.
• CCAMS
• …………
• CRISIS MANAGEMENT
21
Call Sign Similarity (CSS) Tool
CSS Tool
[file] Flight
Schedule
Conflict List
Constraints,
Preferences
Report
Reference
data &
system
parameters
ENV
Data
Profile
Catalogue
Local
Rules
Ref. Similarity
Rules
Ref.
Parameters
Flight Schedule ,Conflict List
User param. & actions, etc…
Live
Data
3. Quality Check
1. Load Schedule
2. Initialise ATC C/S
[file] Flight
Schedule
With proposed ATC C/S
With Status:
Resolved/Unresolved +
reason
4a. Detect
4b. De-conflict
5. Accept
AO AO
CFMU/CSMC
Enter here your presentation title 22
Established through SES IR of the Network Manager
• Focal point for crises
• Alert on the crisis
• To call the right experts
• To propose measures / options to unlock / manage the crisis
• Communicate updated information to aviation community
• To ensure proper communication with media
• Build on lessons learnt to improve response to the next crisis
• Organise and participate in exercises to maintain the level of
readiness
EACCC role
N M C ris is M anagem ent P rocedure (V18 )N
OM
Mgr
on
Dut
yD
NM
&
EAC
CC
Chi
ef
Ope
ratin
g
Offi
cer
AN
SP
s/ S
tate
s /
Airp
orts
/ FA
A /
Mili
tary
/ N
ATO
DR/
COM
Cris
is S
uppo
rt
(logi
stic
s)N
OM
Mgt
CO
M (o
r OP
S
SU
P a
t nig
ht)
Any
aut
horis
ed
Sou
rce
In fo r m D N M-C O M o n th e
p r o ba b le
in cid e n t (e g . S ta r t o f Vo lc
activity )
In fo r m D N M-C O M o n th e
in cid en t (e g .
S ta r t o f e r u p tio n o r
a le r t p h ase
in E U R D EP )
G ath er
in fo ;
issu e A IM 1
G ath er
in fo ;
a sse ss w ith N O M
M g r/C O O ;
In fo r m
C O M
C a ll N O M
M g r /C O O ;
a sse ss in cide n t
jo in tly
O r g an ise & ru n
te leco n f
G ath er in fo ; sen d A IM ;
u pd a te N O P
he ad line n ew s, in fo r m
A O L C
U p da te E V IT A w ith
fo re cast in fo & N O T A M co o rd ina te s, up d a te
N O P ( + he a d lin e n ew s)
C o nta ct
re leva n t F M Ps +
r e ce ive
m e a su r es
A pp ly m ea sur
es
B ack to no r m a l
O P S
Issu e
A IM ; u p da te
N O P
R e co ver fr om
cr is is
Assess
in cid e n t w ith
C O M a nd b r ie f C O O ( if no t
ye t d on e)
C a ll in N O M
M gt+ do m a in
e xp e r ts; jo in
th is g r o up
G ath er in fo ;
assess th e
in cid e n t
M e et on
site
C r is is fo ca l
p o in t: In fo r m
D R /C O M
Assess incide n t
w ith N O M M gt a nd
C O M ; g a th e r in fo;
In fo r m D N M
C on su lt E AC C C
C o -C h a ir s
M on ito r
in cid e n t ;
ga the r in fo
E AC C C to b e co n ve n ed
In str u ct C O M to u pd a te N O P +
se n d A IM to
d ecla r e C r isis
typ e X
In str u ct C r is is Su p po r t to
co nve ne
EA C C C &
S ta te C on f
In fo r m
D G on
p r og r ess
Jo in
E AC C C te leco n f
C on tact S ta te fo ca l po in ts o r
in str u ct C r is is
Su p to se n d in vita tion
C o nta ct in fo
so u rce s
like VA AC s
B ack to no r m a l
O P S
In fo rm
C O M
In fo rm
E A C C C ( if
co nve ne d )
R un te le co n f;
stud y in fo
on cr is is
D e cid e o n E AC C C p o sit ion
E nsu r e tha t la test cr is is
s itu a tio n is
co m m u n ica te d
to p o lit ica l bo d ie s
M on ito r cr is is ,
ga the r in fo
Ba ck to n o rm a l
O PS
In fo r m
po litica l bo d ie s
D ism antle
E AC C
C
C o lle ct in fo v ia
foca l p t; jo in O PS
& E AC C C te le co n f
In fo r m m ed ia
M on ito r s itu a tio n ;
r e co r d d ecis io n s + tim es +
r ea son s/co n te xt
Y
N
Y
Y
N
Y
N
S en d N O T A M s
S en d
m e a su r es to b e
a p p lie d
C o m p ile in fo + In str u ct C O M
to u pd a te
N O P + sen d A IM
In fo r m D G
o n
p r o gr e ss
M on ito r
in cide n t ;
g a th er in fo
C o nta ct
S ta te
fo ca l
p o in ts
C on tact in fo
sou r ce s
like
V AA C s
Jo in N O M
M gt g rp
N
C a ll in m o r e sta ff if
ne e de d ; ca ll
C S O (se e ch ecklist ) ;
a le r t A O L C
S e nd
n ece ssa ry
d a ta (e g . vo lca n ic a sh
d a ta)
C o n ta ct
r e leva n t
F M P s + r e ce ive
m e asu re s
S e nd
m ea su r es to be
ap p lie d
In fo r m a ffe cted
F M P s, r e le van t
ext. avia tio n a g en cie s (w he n
ne cessar y )
issu e A IM 2
U pd ate
N O P + h e ad line
ne w s
A pp ly
m e asu re s
A ssig n :- C r is is S up p or t
r o le
- C r is is fo ca l po in t fo r D R/C O M
- C r is is S p oke sp e rso n(s ) fo r D R/C O M
M a ke sur e th a t
the EA C C C co n f
r oo m & lo g istics is ava ilab le &
r e ad y
In vite (v ia
SM S ) S ta te s fo r
te le con f
C o lla te a ll
r eco rd s fo r
p ost-cr isis
r e vie w
1 2 35
67 8
94
10
1 1 1 31 4
1 5 16 17
12
34 5 6 7 8 9 11 11
1
2
4
5
56
783
91 0
2 3 4 4
45
5
41
2 3
R un S ta te te le con f
11
In vite (v ia
SM S ) EA C C C fo r
te le con f
2
R u n
S ta te
te le con f
1 0
M e et w ith C o m m s C r is is T ea m :u pd a te on the situ a tio n ; d ecide on
n ext ste p s & r o les a llo ca tion ;
p e r fo rm log istics ch eck ; sta ff ava ila b ility ch e ck ; d e cid e o n n e xt
m ee ting
B r ie fin g w ith
E C & EA SA com m u n ica tio ns r e sp o nsib le s
Po st- cr is is
a na lysis a n d
le sso ns lea r n t
B r ie f
N O M M g t
1 2
B r ie fin g C r is is
Sp o ke spe r so n (s)
fo r p re ss in te r v iew p r ep a ra tion s
C h e ck w ith N O M
m gt/C O O w he the r to co n ta ct E C a nd /
o r EA S A
Pr e pa r e p re ss
r e lea ses an d che ck w ith C O O /
E AC C C C h a ir m an
A sse ss incide n t ;
g a th er in fo
1
F M P s ( +
o th er
a g en cie s ) a r e
in fo r m e d
F M Ps sta r t
loca l co n tin g en cy
p la n s
R E C O V E R Y &
A N A L Y S IS P h a s eP R E- A L E R T P h a s e C R IS IS P h a s eO P E R A T IO N A L P h a s e
NOP
Unique tool for Planning,
Collaborating, Information,
Transacting
Real time situation display
Dynamic solutions