Spring 2011 Strategic Data Project Convening Dr. Rorie Harris and Jessica Lotz, Memphis City Schools...

Post on 18-Dec-2015

218 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Spring 2011 Strategic Data Project Convening Dr. Rorie Harris and Jessica Lotz, Memphis City Schools...

Spring 2011 Strategic Data Project ConveningDr. Rorie Harris and Jessica Lotz, Memphis City Schools

The Teacher Effectiveness Measure (TEM):

An Overview and Update

2

The Teacher Effectiveness Measure:More Than an Evaluation

40%

5%5%

35%

15%

Observation Stakeholder Perceptions

Content Knowledge Student Growth

Student Achievement

The TEM System Is:• A multi-measure

evaluation tool

• A process for instructional leadership

and management

• A map for assigning teacher professional

development and support resources

3

40%

5%5%

35%

15%

Observation Stakeholder Perceptions

Content Knowledge Student Growth

Student Achievement

TEM Data Sources:

• Observation (40%) – 605 trained, certified administrators conduct 4 – 6 observations for each teacher annually using the TEM rubric

• Stakeholder Perceptions (5%) – All schools administer the TRIPOD student survey 2 times during the school year

• Content Knowledge (5%) – Teachers select from a menu of options including completion of content-specific PD, port-folio of work, and observations by content specialists

Teacher Effectiveness Measure

Teacher Effectiveness Measure

4

40%

5%5%

35%

15%

Observation Stakeholder Perceptions

Content Knowledge Student Growth

Student Achievement

TEM Data Sources:

• Student Growth (35%) – The state of TN provides student growth scores (TVAAS) based on state standardized test results for individual teachers and schools

• Student Achievement (15%) – The state of TN provides a menu of options that teachers select from for other student-data based measures

5

Distribution of TEM Ratings and Raw Scores

TEM 1 TEM 2 TEM 3 TEM 4 TEM 50%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

2%

19%

39%

25%

15%

2011-12 TEM Profile Distribution

6

Distribution of Qualitative Data (Observations, Stakeholder Perceptions and Content Knowledge)

100 120 140 160 180 200 220 2400%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

Distribution of Qualitative Scores by Tested/Non-Tested Status

Non-Tested Tested

7

TEM Qualitative and Quantitative Scores by Tested/Non-Tested Status

Challenge Clarify Care Consolidate Captivate Confer Control 0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

72%69%

67% 67%

59%

54%

48%

7 Cs Tripod Survey Results - District AveragePe

rcen

t in

Agre

emen

t

8