Slms innovassessmnt

Post on 17-Jun-2015

426 views 2 download

Tags:

Transcript of Slms innovassessmnt

Barbara Stripling & Paige Jaeger & You

The FBI will not come after you if you misuse, misquote, or copy information from the PPT,

However, this PPT was created using original material and PPT slides shared from colleagues who have given permission to share these with our educators.

Please do not copy or distribute.

(Suggestion from Copyright for Educators, Simpson p.84 1st Edition )

Grab one and wait for directions, please.

Teachers APPR

60% = Aligned to the NYS Teaching Standards:

1. Knowledge of Students & Student Learning 2. Knowledge of Content & Instructional Planning 3. Instruction 4.Learning Environment 5.Assessment for Student Learning 6. Collaboration & Professional Responsibilities 7. Professional Growth

7

“twenty percent of the evaluation shall be based upon student growth data on state assessments … or

comparable measure of student growth if such growth data is not available.”

State Ed & RTTT:

Locally developed measures may include:

From Institutional to Individual Accountability

http://www.flickr.com/photos/11629603@N04/4023889447

/

Results in a single composite score of teacher or principal effectiveness

PJaeger - WSWHE School Library System

“Expedited 3020A proceedings”

It helps you with the regulations:

◦ Ed Law: 90.18 ◦ Ed Law 30.12c ◦ Expedited 3020A ?

Data = tool for your mission, goal, required, APPR, to assess

learning, and more

http://www.polleverywhere.com/multiple_choice_polls/NDE2MjU2MTA1

To inform learning

monitor & adjust

Direct Data Measurable –

QuantitativeTesting In September Testing in June Direct numerical

values Measurable growth Testing upon entrance

to [6th] grade…testing upon exit from [8th] grade…etc.

Develop a September assessment?

Indirect data (not for grading, but direction)

Qualitative Ex. CirculationCorrelation between

circulation and test scores?

Number of classes co-taught

Skill reinforcement Item analysis, log

lessons taught, collaborate with teachers

http://www.corestandards.org/presentations

Rubrics are great to guide me, but I need additional formative assessments along the way which are

engaging.

The real message is…Formalize your informal assessment

◦ Pre-assess formally ◦ Pre-assess informally◦ Pre-assess innovatively Are you

doing this, and don’t realize it?

Judy Goralski LibrarianDorothy Nolan, SSCSD

Low tech No Tech Or online via:

◦ Mindmeister.com ◦ Popplet.com

Graffiti Placemats

Disguised label for “mind mapping”

Assessable Archive… Information known Misinformation ?Names & Dates

L. Alden, SGF Harrison Ave. Librarian

L. Alden, SGF Harrison Ave.

(3rd Grade)

Fort Ann CSDKarin Howansky

http://doodle.com/pgtzcp7ksfvcyh4e

Transcript of SlaveryQuestion518 « TodaysMeet.mht

Laurie Alden, SGF Harrison Avenue

1. Standard texting rates only (worst case US $0.20)2. We have no access to your phone number3. Capitalization doesn’t matter, but spaces and spelling do

TIPS

EXAMPLE

Capitalization doesn’t matter, but spaces and spelling doTIP

EXAMPLE

1. Capitalization doesn’t matter, but spaces and spelling do2. Since @poll is the first word, your followers will not receive this tweetTIPS

EXAMPLE

On-going, formative, assessments.

Rigor, relevance & rubrics

Turn your colored paper over, please Compare beginning to end.

http://www.stixy.com/guest/95134

47

Appropriate Training for All Evaluators

Teacher/Principal Improvement Plans (Developing/Ineffective)

Utilize Evaluation Results as a Factor in Career Ladder Decisions and Other Recognition

Locally-Developed Appeal Process

Expedited 3020a Process (Single Hearing Officer/After Two Consecutive Ineffective Ratings)

48

New performance evaluation system for teachers : 20% - State student growth data or comparable measure of

student growth 20% - Locally selected measures of student achievement

that are determined to be rigorous and comparable across classrooms in accordance with regulations of Commissioner

60% - Multiple measures of teacher/principal effectiveness based on standards prescribed in the Regulations of the Commissioner

Four rating categories: highly effective; effective; developing; ineffective

Results in a single composite score of teacher or principal effectiveness