September 27, 2005Status Report, SPSC 1 Experiments NA48/1 & NA48/2 Status Report (SPSC-2005-031)...

September 27, 2005Status Report, SPSC

Experiments NA48/1 & NA48/2Experiments NA48/1 & NA48/2

Status Report (SPSC-2005-031)

CERN, Cambridge, Chicago, Dubna, Edinburgh, Ferrara, Firenze, Mainz, Northwestern, Perugia, Pisa, Saclay, Siegen, Torino, Vienna

Collaboration:

V.Kekelidze for

Content

Introduction Rare decays in the experiment NA48/1 Search for direct CP-violation in the NA48/2 Test of PT: precise measurement of

the - scattering length Rare decay of charged kaons Leptonic & semileptonic decays Summary & request

High Precision Study of Kaon & Hyperon Decays

Physics motivation for the experimentsPhysics motivation for the experiments

Search for new physics & tests of the SM High accuracy tests of low energy QCD (PT) Quantitative tests of various model predictions

• NA48/1 NA48/1

2000 Phase I (no spectrometer): KS & KL decays

2002 Phase II (high intensity run): KS & Hyperon decays

KS in fiducial volume: ~ 3.5 1010

• NA48/2 NA48/2 simultaneous K+ and K- beams

2003 – 2004 K in fiducial volume: > 2. 1011

Rare decays in Rare decays in the experiment the experiment

NA48/1NA48/1

Measurement of Br(KSe)

Br = (6.8 0.2stat 02sys)10-4

PDG value : (6.9 0.4)10-4

analysis finishedpaper preparationis in progress

is improved in precision~13’000

0+e+e decays

BR= (2.57 0.12stat +0.10 –0.09 syst)10-4

in good agreement withour measurement:

BR= (0+e-e)=(2.510.03stat 0.09syst)10-4

0+- decays

BR= (2.2 0.3stat 0.2 syst)10-6

102 decays32 3.0

background

most precise measurement

paper in preparation

(4.7+0.2-1.4 stat0.8sys)10-6

R= N(0)/ N(0) R= (9.31 0.05stat 0.04 syst)10-2

new (preliminary)

Br(KS + - 0) submitted to PRL

Search for direct Search for direct CP-violation CP-violation

in NA48/2in NA48/2

Direct CP violation

in K± ± ± , K± ± 0 0 M(u) 1 + gu, u = f( )

g = g+ - g- = 2Ag<g>

(Ag ) < 210 – 4 (limited by statistics)

GoalGoal

g + - g -

Ag = ———— g+ + g -

Requirements to experiment:

• high statistics (~ few109 decays)• stability in time• set –up symmetry

Measurements & predictions

Experimental precisions by 2005:Experimental precisions by 2005:

SMSM SUSYSUSYNewNew

physicsphysics

Ford et al. (1970)

HyperCP prelim. (2000)

TNF prelim. (2002)“neutral” mode

NA48/2proposal

SM estimates vary within an order of magnitude (few 10few 10-6-6……

8x108x10-5-5). Models beyond SM predict substantial

enhancement partially within the reach of NA48/2.

[[AAgg~10~10-3-3]]

“charged”“neutral”

Theory

Asymmetry in decay widthsexpected to be smaller than

in Dalitz-plot slopes(SM: ~10-7…10-6).

NA48/2 method

– Two simultaneous K+ and K– beams, superimposed in space, with narrow momentum spectra;

– Detect asymmetry exclusively considering slopes of ratios of normalized U distributions;

– Equalize K+ and K– acceptances by frequently alternating polarities of relevant magnets.

50 100

200 250 m

vacuum tank

He tank+ spectrometer

magnetB+

NA48/2NA48/2 experiment configuration experiment configuration

114m decay volume

focusing beams

DFDFQuadrupole Quadruplet

beams coincide within <1mm

FRONT-END ACHROMAT

PK spectra, 603 GeV/c

54 60 66

The simultaneous K+ and K- beams NA48 Set-Up

not to scale

TAX 17 TAX 18

~71011

ACHROMAT

20032003 run:run: ~ 50 days~ 50 days(~ 1 month stable conditions)(~ 1 month stable conditions)

20042004 run: ~ 60 daysrun: ~ 60 days

~ ~ 200 TB of data recorded200 TB of data recorded

NA48/2NA48/2 runs runs

recorded events, 10 6 # of Super-Samples

Run K - + K 0 0 (complete cycles)

2003-I 670 20 SS0

2003-II 940 28 SS1-3

Statistics

data taken in 2004: calibrated, reprocessed & filtered

analysis started

Super-samples 2003Super-samples 2003

Dates Sub-samples

Achromat A+ Achromat A–

K+ K– K+ K–

0 22.06-25.07 26 229.6229.6 125.9125.9 201.0201.0 114.0114.0

1 6.08-20.08 12 122.5122.5 68.168.1 135.1135.1 75.475.4

2 20.08-3.09 12 147.2147.2 81.881.8 105.5105.5 58.958.9

3 3.09-7.09 4 40.640.6 22.622.6 54.554.5 30.430.4

Total 54 Total events selected 1613.2

Statistics selected for Ag measurement, events x106

Selected statistics 2003

even pionin beam pipe

Data-taking 2003: 1.61x101.61x1099 events selected

KK+ + : 1.03x10: 1.03x109 9 eventsevents

KK : 0.58x10: 0.58x109 9 eventsevents

odd pionin beam pipe

MM=1.7 MeV/c=1.7 MeV/c22

Events

Beam movement in time

DCH1(upstream magnet)

X, cm Typical scales:• beam movement in time ~2mm• beam width ~5mm

0 0.4 0.8-0.4-0.8

Beam profile @DCH1(a small fraction of data)

Acceptance cancellation cancellation within a supersample

N(A+B+K+)N(A+B-K-)RUS=

Detector left-right asymmetry cancels in 4 ratios of KK++ over Kover K uu-spectra-spectra::

JuraJura

SSalevealeve

Achromats: KAchromats: K++ UUpp

Achromats: KAchromats: K++ Down Down

Indexes of R’s correspond to• beamline polarity (U/D);• direction of kaon deviation in spectrometer magnet field (S/J)

• same deviation direction by spectrometer magnet in numerator and denominator;same deviation direction by spectrometer magnet in numerator and denominator;• data from 2 different time periods used at this stage.data from 2 different time periods used at this stage.

N(A+B-K+)N(A+B+K-)RUJ=

N(A-B+K+)N(A-B-K-)RDS=

N(A-B-K+)N(A-B+K-)RDJ=

R(u) = RUS RUJ RDS RDJ=N(1+4gu)

Example of fits: supersample 1

22=38.1/38=38.1/38

22=37.5/38=37.5/38 22=50.5/38=50.5/38

22=35.6/38=35.6/38 22=34.8/38=34.8/38

AAUS=(2.4=(2.4±4.6)x10±4.6)x10-4-4

AADS=(8.2=(8.2±4.4)x10±4.4)x10-4-4

AAUJJ=(-=(-0.20.2±4.6)x10±4.6)x10-4-4

AADJ=(-=(-1.01.0±4.4)x10±4.4)x10-4-4

=(2.3=(2.3±2.2)x10±2.2)x10-4-4R(u)/N

Time-stability (vs super-sample)Time-stability (vs super-sample)

Monte-Carlo describeseffects of

permanent magnetic fieldsand differences of

beamline properties

(S-J)/2 (D-U)/2

left / right up / downset-up asymmetry:

Stability vs kinematic variablesStability vs kinematic variables

g x10-4

Result & systematicsConservative estimations

of systematic errors

Effect on

Δx104

Acceptance and beam geometry

Spectrometer alignment 0.1

Analyzing magnet field 0.1

π± decay 0.4

U calculation and fitting 0.5

Pile-up 0.3

Syst. errors of statistical nature

Trigger efficiency: L2 0.8

Trigger efficiency: L1 0.4

Total Total systematic error 1.31.3

Raw Corrected for L2 eff

SS0 0.0±1.5 0.5 ± 2.4

SS1 0.9±2.0 2.2 ± 2.2

SS2 -2.8 ± 2.2 -3.0 ± 2.5

SS3 2.0 ± 3.4 -2.6 ± 3.9

TotalTotal -0.2 ± 1.0 -0.2 ± 1.3

22 2.2 / 3 3.2 / 3

Combined result: Δx104

(3 independent analyses) L2 trigger systematics included

Preliminary result: 2003 dataPreliminary result: 2003 data

Slope difference:Δg = (-0.2±1.0stat.±0.9stat.(trig.)±0.9syst.)10-4 = (-0.2±1.7)10-4

Charge asymmetry:Ag = (0.5±2.4stat.±2.1stat.(trig.)±2.1syst.) 10-4 = (0.5±3.8)10-

• systematic errors are conservative for preliminary result

• better control of systematics in 2004 due to: - more frequent polarity alternation

- better L2 performance

specific features:one charged track (±) to measure

asymmetry

Lkr used for 0 0 identification

different acceptance (u) & large g0= 0.652 ± 0.033

Asymmetry in K± ± 0 0 preliminary result based on SS0-SS3 (~ 48 M decays)

K 00 + 4

reconstruction algorithm

pairs of ’s should have a common vertex compatible withkaon decay

E1E2 (d12)2

Reconstructed decays K± ± 0 0

preliminary result based on SS0-SS3 (~ 48 M decays)

~31M ~17M

Data analyzed: SS-0,-12,-3

g0 = (2.2 2.2 stat)10-4

g1N)(RCC

R(u), 10-4 SS0

R(u), 10-4

Stability check & comparison with MC

left / right up / downset-up asymmetry:

exper.

g0AS-AJ AU-AD

Stability checks of obtained g0

day sample|V|

Result (preliminary):

three analyses obtain very close results

A0g major systematics in 10-4 units: alignment (<

0.1) acceptance & beam geometry (< 0.1)

momentum scale (< 0.1)u-calculation & fit (< 0.4)

accidentals (< 1.0)L1 trigger (< 1.5), L2 trigger (< 0.4),

fit region (0.0025),LKr nonlinearity corrections (< 0.4)

A0g = (1.7 1.7stat 1.2trig 1.0syst 0.2extern)10-4

Test of Test of PT :PT :precise measurement of precise measurement of the the -- scattering length scattering length

Theory calculationpredicted by PT first principles (Weinberg 1966)G.Colangelo, J.Gasser, H.Leutwyler, NP B603(2001)125

scattering length

m + = - 0.0444 ± 0.001002a0

0a m + = 0.220 ± 0.00500a( - )

02a m += - 0.265±0.004 1.5%

Experimental measurements mesoatom lifetime (DIRAC) form-factors in Ke4 decays

for the first time: Geneva-Saclay (1977): 30,000 events

best measurement: BNL E865 (2001): 400,000 events

precision limited by statistics

00a| - |2

= 0.216 ± 0.013stat ±0.002syst±0.002theor

Statistics of NA48/2: > 1,000,000 Ke4 events

measurement of from K (3)

simple model: N. Cabibbo, P.L.B 93(2004)121801

A threshold effect in M(00) has been observed (cusp structure) for the first time in NA48/2 thanks to

high resolution in energy high statistics

collectedindication to the re-scattering of + - 0 0

in the decay K + - 0 0 is related to

00a( - )

02aNew way !

two loops approximation: N.Cabibbo, G.Isidori, JHEP03(2005)021

(I symmetry is foreseen)introduce I-breaking parameter = (m+

2 - mo2)/m+

2 = 0.065 M.Knecht, R.Urech, N.P. B519(1998)329;

G. Colangelo,J.Gasser,B.Kubis,A.Rusetsky: Kaon Mini-workshop (CERN-05)

First Observation of the + - -thresholdin K M0 0 decays

M2(00), (GeV/c2)2 M2(00), (GeV/c2)2

4m2()= 0.0779(GeV/c2)2

~23M decays

Fit quality Simple Cabibbo model:

axm+ = (a0 - a2)m+/3

2/D.F. = 420.1 / 148

= data - MC

Cabibbo, Isidori: two loop approximation;I- breaking (1 parameter)

(a0 - a2)m+, a2m+ , g0 , h+ , N

2/D.F = 154.8 / 146

…..+ pionium (1.61 0.66)10-5

2/D.F.=149.1 / 145

consistent with Z.Silagadze calc: 0.810-5

exclude pionium region 2/D.F.=145.5 / 139

Results (paper in preparation):

two analysis (different MC & criteria) obtain very close results

m+ major systematics: acceptance (0.001)

trigger (0.001)fit region (0.0025)

LKr resolution & nonlinearity (0.001) track- separation (0.002)

taking into account uncertainty in theory ~ 5% (ext):

00a( - )

m+ = 0.268 0.010stat 0.004syst 0.013ext

m+ = - 0.041 0.021stat 0.014syst

00a( - )

02a02a

m+ = 0.220 0.006stat 0.004syst 0.003R 0.011theor

m+= 0.264 0.006stat 0.004syst 0.003R 0.013theor

Results (continuation):

taking into account uncertainty in R= A ++- / A+00

& theoretical constrains between

experimental uncertainty < 3% - limited by statisticswhich will be increased using 2004 data by factor ~ 4

00a( - )

K±+-e±ν (Ke4)

taking into account additional data (SS0 & 2004) it is expected in total:

> 1000k decays

background

selection:2003 data SS1-3: ~ 350k (background ~0.5%)

mproducts

expected precision in better than ±0.010stat

Cabibbo-Maksymowicz variables

background

, e have opposite sign for

K+ & K- (T.D. Lee and C.S.Wu –1966)

d5K-(m,me,,e,)= d5K+ (m,m e,,-e,+)

- line of flight in K rest frame

both K+ and K- decays are accumulated at similar experimental conditions this allows to tests CP, and CPT (for the fist time)

and provide reliable cross checks for possible systematic ancertainties

Other Rare Decays Other Rare Decays of Charged Kaonsof Charged Kaons

SS1-3:~1 month of running in 2003

GoalsGoals

Rare decays to test PT & search for ACP

K , K 0 DE

K e+ e, K + , Ke2

K l l+l

K 0 , K 0 l+l, … etc.

T: 55 – 90 MeV

• Br=(2.750.15)10-4

DE contribution:• Br=(4.70.9)10-6

Interference term – possible source of

(order of magnitudehigher than others)

Z=(M(ee)/MK)2M(± e+e-), GeV/c2

Statistics comparable to the World best sample at low background (1-2%)

K±±e+e- & K±±+-

K± ± e+e-.Statistics > PDG

Analyses are ongoing: form-factors study

Leptonics & SemileptonicsLeptonics & Semileptonicsof Charged Kaonsof Charged Kaons

Special minimum-bias runs in 2003 & 2004

Goals Goals

Leptonics & Semileptonic decays:

Ke3, K

BR’s to improve precision of |Vus|

& check CKM unitarity,

check -e universality

form-factors to search for fT, fS

Results (preliminary)

• R(Ke3/K2) = 0.2505 0.0009stat 0.0012syst • R(K3/K2) = 0.1646 0.0006stat 0.0011syst • R(K3/Ke3) = 0.657 0.003stat 0.003syst

• R(Ke2/K2 )= 2.416 0.043stat 0.024syst 2003 run

• R(Ke2/K2 )= 2.453 0.046stat 0.026syst 2004 run

PDG = 2.45 0.11SM = 2.472 0.001

Summary & RequestSummary & Request

Special minimum-bias runs in 2003 & 2004

NA48/1 high precision results are obtained on Ks decays and hyperon

semileptonics, (analysis continues)

NA48/2 first results are obtained on charged asymmetry in both

K± ± +- and K± ± 00 decaysbased on 2003 data

achieved precision is limited by statistics

NA48/2NA48/2(cont.)

A “cusp” structure has been observed

for the first time in K 0 0 decays

which allows to high precision measurement

of - scattering length Large sample of both signs of K±e4

decays provides good opportunity for

high precision measurements of - scattering length

& for the first time - various asymmetries

Large statistics of K± decays is accumulated for the study

of various rare decays

Precise measurement of K± leptonics & semileptonics decays

contributes to the CKM unitarity & -e universality

checks

NA48/2NA48/2(cont.)

2003 data-analysis ongoing

2004 data-calibrated, reprocessed & filtered-analysis has started

NA48/2NA48/2(cont.)

Resources Request for 2006

• Data storage at CERN:

reserve CASTOR space

~ 5 TB for MC data

~ 30 TB for possible reprocessing (?),

• CPU power:

guaranteed share for ongoing analysis

Spares

Results on Ag

Other experiment data on Agc

BNL (1970): (- 7.0 ± 5.3)∙10-3

FNAL, HyperCP –2000 (preliminary) (2.2±1.5±3.7)∙10-3

Serpukhov data on Ag0

I.V.Ajinenko et al., PLB567(2003)159.: (5.1 ± 2.8 )∙10-3

G.A.Akopdzhanov, hep-ex/0406008 prelim.: (0.2 ± 1.9 )∙10-3

Leptonic decay selection56 hour minimum-bias run in 2004

3.91064000

(missing mass)2 ,(GeV/c2)2(missing mass)2 ,(GeV/c2)2

Matrix element described with 5 Cabibbo-Maksymowicz variables

d5(K+) (s,se) J(m,mecoscose) d(me)d(m)d(cos)d(cosed(

where s m se me

exchange K+ K-→ e+ e-

g’ ei

Ke4 form factors: mK

2 F1 = fsei + cos (fpe

if+ g) à la Pais-Treiman mK

2 F2 = g mK

2 F3 = hei

fit parameters: g, g’, h; with s g; ff gh g

K- vs K+ matrix element: d5(K-, m me e ) = d5(K+, m me e )

line of flight in K rest frame

e plane plane

Basic Ke4+ and Ke4

- form factors

September 27, 2005Status Report, SPSC 1 Experiments NA48/1 & NA48/2 Status Report (SPSC-2005-031)...

Documents

Transcript of September 27, 2005Status Report, SPSC 1 Experiments NA48/1 & NA48/2 Status Report (SPSC-2005-031)...

Decadimenti radiativi rari dei K nellesperimento NA48 del CERN Collaborazione NA48 Cagliari, Cambridge, CERN, Dubna, Edimburgo, Ferrara, Firenze, Mainz,

CP Violation Results From the NA48 Experiments Giuseppina Anzivino University of Perugia and INFN on Behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration Cambridge, CERN,

L’esperimento NA48 Ermanno ImbergamoL’esperimento NA48 Ermanno Imbergamo Perugia - 14 Aprile 2003 INFN, seminari di gruppo I On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration Ermanno Imbergamo

SPSC Autumn 2012 newsletter

Highlights on rare kaon decays from NA48/2 Monica Pepe INFN Perugia on behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration Cambridge, CERN, Chicago, Dubna, Edinburgh, Ferrara,

Final measurement of e ’/ e by NA48

Investigations of Semileptonic Kaon Decays at the NA48 Еxperiment Milena Dyulendarova (University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”) for NA48 Collaboration.

Dubna 2012

NA48 the CERN Kaon facility

NA48 highlights

CERN, 11-5-2009A. Ceccucci1 NA62: New Opportunities In Rare Kaon Decays CERN-SPSC-2005-013 SPSC-P-326 CERN-SPSC-2007-035 SPSC-M760 Bern ITP, Birmingham,

1 High precision study of charge asymmetry in K ± 3 ± decays by NA48/2 at CERN SPS Evgueni Goudzovski (JINR, Dubna) on behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration:

Experiments NA48/1 & NA48/2

Spsc Pcs 2008 Papers-1

DUBNA-NANO2010 - BLTP JINR Home Pagetheor.jinr.ru/~nano10/abstracts/Dubna-Nano2010_abstracts.pdf · DUBNA-NANO2010 Book of abstracts July 5-10, 2010 Dubna, Russia Dubna 2010 . УДК

2017 CAST SPSC Report - CERN

NA48 status report

EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR …cds.cern.ch/record/1172365/files/SPSC-SR-046.pdfFORXG SPSC-SR-046 SPSC-SR-046 06/05/2009 15/04/2009 EUROPEAN ORGANIZATION FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH

COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE - SPSC

October 28, 2003V.Kekelidze 1 Experiment NA48/2 A Precision Measurement of Charged Kaon Decay Parameters (CERN/SPSC 2000-003) Status Report (SPSC-2003-033)