Post on 04-Apr-2018
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
1/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
2/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
3/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
4/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
5/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
6/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
7/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
8/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
9/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
10/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
11/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 76 Filed 11/16/12 Page 9 of 21
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
12/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
13/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 76 Filed 11/16/12 Page 11 of 21
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
14/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 76 Filed 11/16/12 Page 12 of 21
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
15/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
16/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
17/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
18/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 76 Filed 11/16/12 Page 16 of 21
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
19/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
20/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 76 Filed 11/16/12 Page 18 of 21
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
21/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 76 Filed 11/16/12 Page 19 of 21
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
22/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
23/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
24/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
25/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
26/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 75 Filed 11/16/12 Page 3 of 4
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
27/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
28/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 74 Filed 11/14/12 Page 1 of 9
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
29/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
30/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
31/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
32/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
33/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 74 Filed 11/14/12 Page 6 of 9
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
34/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 74 Filed 11/14/12 Page 7 of 9
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
35/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
36/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 74 Filed 11/14/12 Page 9 of 9
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
37/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
38/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
39/49
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 73 Filed 11/14/12 Page 3 of 3
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
40/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
41/49
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - xChristian Louboutin S.A., Christian Louboutin,
L.L.C. and Christian Louboutin,
Plaintiffs/Counterclaim-Defendants,
vs.
Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc., Yves Saint
Laurent America Holding, Inc. and
Yves Saint Laurent S.A.S., et al.,
Defendants/Counterclaim-Plaintiffs.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x
Civil Action Number 11-cv-2381 (VM)
ECF Case
MEMORANDUM OF LAW OF DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFFS
IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS THEIR COUNTERCLAIMS VOLUNTARILY
DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
David H. Bernstein (dhbernstein@debevoise.com)
Jyotin Hamid (jhamid@debevoise.com)Rayna S. Feldman (rsfeldman@debevoise.com)
919 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022Telephone 212-909-6696
Dated: New York, New York Counsel to Defendants and Counterclaim PlaintiffsOctober 16, 2012 Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc.,
Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc.,
and Yves Saint Laurent S.A.S.
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 71 Filed 10/17/12 Page 1 of 7
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
42/49
Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc., Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc. and Yves
Saint Laurent S.A.S. (collectively, YSL) respectfully submit this memorandum of law in
support of their motion to dismiss voluntarily their counterclaims against Christian Louboutin
S.A., Christian Louboutin L.L.C. and Christian Louboutin (collectively, Louboutin).
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
In its September 5, 2012 ruling in this case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit directed that final judgment be entered in YSLs favor on all of Louboutins federal
trademark claims. The Court of Appeals ruled conclusively that the YSL monochromatic shoes
that Louboutin challenged in this lawsuit do not infringe any trademark rights of Louboutin.
As a result, the only issues remaining to be litigated in this case are YSLs counterclaims
against Louboutin. In light of YSLs conclusive victory in defeating Louboutins claims, and for
the reasons detailed herein, YSL believes it appropriate to dismiss its counterclaims voluntarily,
thus resolving what remains of this litigation and allowing the parties to close the book on this
litigation and refocus their attention on their respective fashion creations.
Counterclaims Seeking Cancellation. Four of YSLs counterclaims seek cancellation of
Louboutins U.S. Trademark Registration on various bases. This Court had subject matter
jurisdiction over those counterclaims only because Louboutin had asserted claims for trademark
infringement against YSL. With Louboutins claims now removed as a result of the Second
Circuit ruling, this Court no longer has subject matter jurisdiction with respect to YSLs
counterclaims seeking cancellation. Under controlling law in this Circuit, district courts lack
subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate a claim for cancellation of a federal trademark
registration if no other basis for federal jurisdiction is present; instead, such claims must be
brought before the Trademark Trials & Appeals Board (the T.T.A.B.) of the United States
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 71 Filed 10/17/12 Page 2 of 7
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
43/49
2
Patent & Trademark Office. Accordingly, the counterclaims seeking cancellation should be
dismissed without prejudice.
Counterclaims for Tortious Interference and Unfair Competition. YSLs fifth and
sixth counterclaims, for tortious interference and unfair competition, are based on Louboutins
efforts in early 2011 to pressure certain retailers to return to YSL the red monochromatic shoes
challenged in this case. Although YSL maintains its view that such actions were wrongful, YSL
was able to mitigate some of its damages by re-selling the returned inventory at YSL boutiques
or through e-commerce. In light of that, and given its desire to refocus its energies on its
business and creative designs, YSL has decided that these claims are no longer worth pursuing.
Accordingly, YSL voluntarily dismisses those counterclaims with prejudice.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Louboutin filed its Complaint and moved for a preliminary injunction on April 7, 2011,
challenging four models of red monochromatic shoes sold by YSL, and asserting federal
trademark claims and related state law claims. YSL filed an Answer and Counterclaims on May
20, 2011, and an Amended Answer and Counterclaims on June 27, 2011. YSL asserted six
counterclaims: four seeking cancellation of Louboutins federal Trademark Registration on
various grounds, and the two for tortious interference and unfair competition, respectively, based
on Louboutins efforts in early 2011 to pressure certain retailers to return to YSL the red
monochromatic shoes challenged in this case.
On July 22, 2011, this Court held a hearing on Louboutins motion for a preliminary
injunction. Preceding the hearing was a period for expedited discovery and full briefing, but
both the discovery and the briefing were limited to issues raised by Louboutins motion; they did
not include any discovery or briefing on YSLs counterclaims. To date, no discovery of any kind
has been taken or exchanged on the counterclaims.
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 71 Filed 10/17/12 Page 3 of 7
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
44/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
45/49
4
Fordham Univ., 900 F.2d 12, 14 (2d Cir. 1990)); AET Rail Group, LLC v. Siemens Transp. Sys.,
Inc., No. 08-CV-6442, 2009 WL 5216960, at *2-3 (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 30, 2009) (applying Zagano
factors to motion seeking dismissal of counterclaims without prejudice).
II. The Counterclaims Seeking Cancellation Should Be Dismissed Without Prejudice.
Dismissal of YSLs counterclaims seeking cancellation of Louboutins federal
Trademark Registration is required because this Court no longer has subject matter jurisdiction
over YSLs counterclaims for cancellation. Under controlling law, a federal district court lacks
subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate a claim for cancellation of a federal trademark
registration if no other basis for federal jurisdiction is present. See Nike, Inc. v. Already, LLC,
663 F.3d 89, 94, 98-99 (2d Cir. 2011), cert. granted, --- S. Ct. ---, 2012 WL 425184 (2012) (once
plaintiffs claims for trademark infringement were conclusively terminated, dismissal of
defendants counterclaim for cancellation was appropriate because court lacked subject matter
jurisdiction over counterclaims for cancellation). Although Louboutins claims against YSL
previously provided a basis for subject matter jurisdiction in the district court, that basis is no
longer present now that the Second Circuit has directed that final judgment be entered in YSLs
favor on all of Louboutins federal trademark claims.
Applying the Zagano factors, the dismissal of YSLs counterclaims seeking cancellation
should be without prejudice:
YSL has a reasonable explanation for seeking dismissal: The Second Circuitsruling has removed the basis for the Courts subject matter jurisdiction over
YSLs counterclaims.
YSL has brought this motion very promptly: YSL has filed this motion withinthree weeks of the Second Circuit issuing its mandate (on September 27).
There is no evidence that YSL asserted its counterclaims for cancellation ofLouboutins Trademark Registration in bad faith or to harass Louboutin. To thecontrary, YSL believed and this Court and the Second Circuit both agreed that
Louboutins Trademark Registration was not valid as previously registered.
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 71 Filed 10/17/12 Page 5 of 7
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
46/49
5
This action has not reached an advanced stage of proceedings, and no discoveryhas taken place with respect to any of YSLs counterclaims.
Because no discovery has taken place on these counterclaims, Louboutin wouldnot have to duplicate expenses if it were forced to relitigate YSLs claims for
cancellation in the future or in another forum (such as the T.T.A.B.).Furthermore, the law is clear in this Circuit that the mere prospect of a secondlawsuit is not a sufficent reason to deny a partys request for voluntary dismissal
without prejudice. Lopes v. First Unum Ins. Co., No. 09CV02642
(RRM)(SMG), 2012 WL 3887517, at * 1 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2012) (citing Cone v.West Virigina Pulp & Paper Co., 330 U.S. 212, 217 (1947)); see also Charles A.
Wright & Arthur R. Miller, 9 Federal Practice and Procedure 2364, at 474-76
(3d ed. 2008)).
Accordingly, YSL respectfully submits that its counterclaims seeking cancellation of
Louboutins Trademark Registration should be dismissed without prejudice.
III. The Counterclaims For Tortious Interference and Unfair Competition Should Be
Dismissed With Prejudice.
YSLs counterclaims for tortious interference and unfair competition were brought as a
result of Louboutins efforts in early 2011 to pressure certain retailers to return to YSL the red
monochromatic shoes challenged in this case. Although YSL maintains its position that such
conduct was improper, YSL was able to mitigate some of its damages by re-selling the returned
inventory to its customers through YSL boutiques and through e-commerce. Now that the
Second Circuit has definitively rejected Louboutins claims against YSL, YSL prefers to refocus
its energies on its business and creative designs, and has determined that these claims are no
longer worth pursuing. As such, YSL is willing to dismiss these counterclaims with prejudice.
Because Louboutin can have no conceivable objection to the dismissal of these claims
with prejudice, YSL respectfully requests that the Court dismiss its counterclaims for tortious
interference and unfair competition with prejudice.
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 71 Filed 10/17/12 Page 6 of 7
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
47/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
48/49
7/30/2019 Second Circuit filings regarding dismissal of claims in Christian Louboutin SA v. Yves Saint Laurent, Inc.
49/49
United States Courthouse, United States District Court Southern District of New York, 500
Pearl Street, New York, New York, for an order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and (c):
(1) dismissing YSLs counterclaims for cancellation without prejudice; and (2) dismissing
YSLs counterclaims for tortious interference and unfair competition with prejudice, and for
such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
Dated: New York, New York
October 16, 2012
DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
/s/ David H. Bernstein____________David H. Bernstein (dhbernstein@debevoise.com)
Jyotin Hamid (jhamid@debevoise.com)
Rayna S. Feldman (rsfeldman@debevoise.com)DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP
919 Third Avenue
New York, New York 10022(212) 909-6696
Attorneys for Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc.,
Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc.,
and Yves Saint Laurent S.A.S.
To: Harley I. Lewin, Esq.
McCarter & English, LLP245 Park Avenue, 27
thFloor
New York, New York 10167
Lee Carl Bromberg, Esq.
McCarter & English, LLP265 Franklin Street
Boston, MA 02110
Case 1:11-cv-02381-VM Document 70 Filed 10/17/12 Page 2 of 2