Post on 03-Apr-2018
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 1/81
Resistivity Logging
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 2/81
Introduction
• The resistivity of a formation is a key parameterin determining hydrocarbon saturation.
• Electricity can pass through a formation onlybecause of the conductive water it contains.
• With a few rare exceptions, such as metallicsulfide and graphite, dry rock is a good electricalinsulator.
• Moreover, perfectly dry rocks are very seldom
encountered.• Therefore, subsurface formations have finite,
measurable resistivities because of the water intheir pores or absorbed in their interstitial clay.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 3/81
• The resistivity of a substance
is the resistance measuredbetween opposite faces of a
unit cube of that substance
at a specified temperature.
• The meter is the unit of
length and the ohm is the
unit of electrical resistance.
• The resistivity of a formation depends on:
– Resistivity of the formation water.
–
Amount of water present. – Pore structure geometry.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 4/81
• Resistivity is a basic measurement of a reservoir’sfluid saturation and is a function of porosity, type
of fluid, amount of fluid and type of rock.• Formation resistivities are usually from 0.2 to
1000 ohm-m.
• Resistivities higher than 1000 ohm-m are
uncommon in permeable formations but areobserved in impervious, very low porosity (e.g.,evaporites) formations.
• Formation resistivities are measured by eithersending current into the formation andmeasuring the ease of the electrical flow throughit or by inducing an electric current into the
formation and measuring how large it is.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 5/81
Factors Affecting Resistivity
• Resisitivities are dependent on:
– Presence of Formation water / Hydrocarbons
– Salinity of Formation water
– Temperature of Formation water
– Volume of water-saturated pore space
– Geometry of the pore space
– Morphology and species of clay minerals
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 6/81
CONVENTIONAL ELECTRICAL LOGS
• During the fist quarter-century of well logging,the only resistiviry logs available were theconventional electrical surveys.
• Thousands of them were run each year in holesdrilled all over the world.
• Since then, more sophisticated resistivity loggingmethods have been developed to measure theresistivity of the flushed zone, Rxo, and the true
resistivity of the uninvaded virgin zone, Rt.• The conventional electrical survey (ES) usually
consisted of an SP, 16-in. normal, 64-in. normal,and 18-ft 8-in. lateral devices.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 7/81
Principle
• Currents were passed through the formation bymeans of current electrodes, and voltages weremeasured between measure electrodes.
• These measured voltages provided the resistivitydeterminations for each device.
• In a homogeneous, isotropic formation of infiniteextent, the equipotential surfaces surrounding asingle current-emitting electrode (A) are spheres.
• The voltagebetween an electrode (M) situated on
one of these spheres and one at infinity isproportional to the resistivity of thehomogeneous formation, and the measuredvoltage can be scaled in resistivity units.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 8/81
Basic Definitions and Ohm’s Law
• Ohm’s Law states that the current flowing
from point A to point B in a conductor ‘I’ is
proportional to the difference in electrical
potential ∆E between point A and point B.
• The constant of proportionality is called the
electrical conductance c.
• Current is measured in amperes (A), potential
difference in volts (V), and conductance in
siemens (S) or mho.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 9/81
• While electrical resistance r, which is the
inverse of conductance is:
Resistance is measured in ohms (Ω). Hence,
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 10/81
• Thus, if we take a cylindrical rock sample withtwo flat faces A and B, and set a potentialdifference ∆E =EA-EB between its end faces, acurrent I will flow through the rock from face Ato face B.
• If we measure the current and the potential
difference, we can calculate the resistance of therock sample.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 11/81
• If the resistance is high, a given potential
difference ∆E will only give a small current I.• If the resistance is low, a given potential
difference ∆E will give a high current I.
The value of resistance is a property of the
material which describes how much the material
resists the passage of a current for a givenapplied potential difference.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 12/81
If the size of our rock sample changes.
• If the length of the sample is doubled, one can
see that the resistance of the sample to thepassage of a current should also double.
• If the area perpendicular to the current flow
doubles (the area of the end face in thisexample), there is twice the material for the
current to pass through, the resistance of the
sample to the passage of the current shouldtherefore fall to a half of what is was before.
So the resistance (and therefore conductance)
depend upon the size of the sample.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 13/81
• The resistance per unit length and area is called the
resistivity R, and can be expressed as
• where:
• R = the resistance of the sample ( Ωm or ohm.m)
• ∆E = the potential difference across the sample (volts, V)
• I = the current flowing through the sample (amperes, A)
• A = the cross-sectional area of the sample perpendicular to the current flow (m2 )
• L = the length of the sample (m).
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 14/81
• Or
R = rA/L,
• The units of resistivity are ohm-meters
squared per meter, or simply ohm-meters
(ohm-m).
• Note that a conductivity C can also be defined
as the reciprocal of the resistivity R, and
therefore
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 15/81
• In petrophysical logging of electrical rock
properties there are two main types of tool.
• One type measures resistivity directly, and theresult is given in ohm.m (Ω.m).
• The other type measures conductivity directly,
and the result is given in either siemens permetre (S/m), or more often to avoid decimal
fractions conductivity is usually expressed in
millisiemens per metre (mS/m) or milli-mhosper meter (mmho/m), where 1000 mmho/m =
1 mho/m.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 16/81
• The two measurements are, of course,
measuring the same property of the rock, and
can be interconverted using the following
equation.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 17/81
Resistivity of Rocks
•Reservoir rocks contain the followingconstituents
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 18/81
• All have a high electrical resistivity (electrical
insulators) except the formation water and water-based mud filtrate, which are good
electrical conductors and have a low electrical
resistivity.• The resistivity of the reservoir rocks therefore
depends only upon the water or water based
mud filtrate occupying its pore space.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 19/81
Uninvaded Formations
• For uninvaded formations, the measured bulk
resistivity of the rock depends only upon the amountof the aqueous formation fluids present in the rock,and the resistivity of those aqueous fluids.
• Since the amount of formation fluids depends both onporosity ф and water saturation S
w, we can say that the
resistivity of the formation Rt depends upon porosity ф,water saturation Sw, and the resistivity of the formationwater Rw.
• This resistivity is called the true resistivity of the
formation.• It is the resistivity of the formation in the uninvaded
zone, where the rock contains some saturation of oil So,gas Sg, and water Sw, and where So+Sg+Sw=1.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 20/81
• The aim is to use knowledge of the resistivity of the formation, together with independent
knowledge of the porosity and resistivity of theformation waters, to calculate Sw, and henceenable ourselves to calculate the STOOIP.
• The uninvaded zone of formations is commonlyonly measured directly by the most deeplypenetrating electrical logging tools.
• The shallower investigating tools measure theinvaded zone.
•
Hence, if onewants a resistivity reading for use inSTOOIP calculations, one should always chose thedeepest penetrating electrical tool of those thathave been run.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 21/81
Invaded Zones
• In most cases there is an invaded zone, where the
formation fluids have been disturbed by the
drilling fluid.
• The resistivity of the formation in this zonedepends upon the resistivity of the mud filtrate
Rmf, the resistivity of any remaining formation
water Rw, the saturation of the mud filtrate SXO,the saturation of the remaining formation water
Sw (if any), and the porosity of the rock ф.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 22/81
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 23/81
Log Presentation
• A problem common to all resistivity and conductivitydevices is providing a scale that can be read accuratelyover the full range of response.
• Most laterologs were recorded on linear scales.
• Because of the very large range of resistivities oftenencountered, the required scale was relativelyinsensitive.
• Very low readings, whether resistivity or conductivity,were virtually unreadable.
• Backup curves of increased sensitivity were introduced,but they were difficult to read and cluttered the log informations of high contrast.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 24/81
• For a while, the hybrid scale, first used on the LL3tool,
• was employed.
• It presented linear resistivity over the first half of the grid track (log), and linear conductivity over
the last half.• Thus, one galvanometer could record all
resistivities from zero to infinity.
• Although somewha awkward to use because of
the odd scale divisions, the hybrid scale didprovide acceptable sensitivity in both low-resistivity and low-conductivity formations.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 25/81
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 26/81
• Today, the logarithmic scale is the most
acceptable scale for recording resistivity
curves.
• Its standard form is a split four-cycle grid
covering the range from 0.2 to 2000.
• Even this range is sometimes not sufficient for
the DLL-Rxo measurements; when needed, a
backup trace is used to cover the range from
2000 to 40,000 ohm-m.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 27/81
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 28/81
Depth of Resistivity Log Investigation
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 29/81
Tools Measuring the Uninvaded Zone
(Rt)
• These tools (deep induction and deep
laterolog) essentially measure Rt, and the log
value is normally quite close to true Rt,
providing the tool is used in the correctenvironment.
• To obtain a more precise value for Rt, certain
corrections must be applied to the raw values.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 30/81
Tools Measuring the Invaded zone (Ri)
• The actual quantitative value of thesereadings is not as important as how these
readings relate to Rt and Rxo. By comparing
them, we can obtain: – Corrected Rt values
– Depth of invasion of the mud filtrate
–
An idea of the formation's permeability – An estimate of movable oil
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 31/81
Tools Measuring the Flushed Zone
(Rxo)
• Four different Rxo tools are available, the ML,
MLL, PL and MSFL.
• They are intended for different conditions of
salinity, mud cake thickness and diameters of
invasion.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 32/81
Resistivity Devices
• In the normal device, a current of constant
intensity is passed between two electrodes, Aand B.
• The resultant potential difference is measuredbetween two other electrodes, M and N.
• Electrodes A and M are on the sonde. B and Nare, theoretically, located an infinite distanceaway.
• The distance AM is called the spacing (16-in.
spacing for the short normal, 64-in. spacing forthe long normal), and the point of inscription forthe measurement is at 0. midway between A andM.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 33/81
Normal device-basic arrangement.Lateral device-basic arrangement
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 34/81
• In the basic lateral device, a constant current
is passed between A and B, and the potentialdifference between M and N is measured.
• Thus, the voltage measured is proportional to
the potential gradient between M-and N. Thepoint of inscription is at O, midway between
M and N.
•
The spacing AO is 18 ft 8 in.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 35/81
• Generally, the longer the spacing, the deeper
the device investigates into the formation.
• Thus, of the ES resistivity logs, the 18-ft 8-in.lateral has the deepest investigation and the
16 in. normal the shallowest.
•In practice, however, the apparent resistivity,Ra, recorded by each device is affected by the
resistivities and geometrical dimensions of all
media around the device (borehole, invadedand uncontaminated zones, and adjacent
beds).
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 36/81
Conventional Resistivity Logs
• The Short Normal (SN) measures the
resistivity of the invaded zone (Ri).
• This curve has the ability to detect invasion by
comparing the separation between the deep
induction and the short normal.
• Invasion will indicate permeability. The SN
curve is recorded in Track #2.
Normal Logs
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 37/81
• Electrical spacing of the electrode is sixteen
inches (short normal) or sixty four inches (longnormal).
• Normal logs provide reliable resistivity values
for beds greater than four feet in thickness.• The curve will be symmetrical around center
of bed. Using this parameter, bed boundaries
will be at the inflection points on the curve.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 38/81
• There are two electrodes in the sonde, acurrent electrode and a pick-up electrode,
with two other electrodes located “an infinitedistance” away (one is the cable armor, theother one is on the surface).
• A current of constant intensity is passedbetween two electrodes, one in the sonde andthe one on the cable.
• The resultant potential difference is measured
between the second electrode in the sondeand the one on the surface.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 39/81
• There are several factors affecting normal log
measurements:
– The resistivity of the borehole (Rm, Rmc, Rmf).
– The depth of invasion (di).
– Formation thickness - the greater the spacing of
electrodes, the thicker the formation must be to get
accurate readings.
–
Resistivity of surrounding beds - when there is a highresistivity contrast, distortion of the curve results.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 40/81
Lateral Logs • The lateral curve is produced by three effective
electrodes (one current and two pick-up) in the sonde.• A constant current is passed between two electrodes,
one on surface, and one in the sonde.
• The potential difference between the two electrodes,
located on two concentric spherical equipotentialsurfaces, centered around the current electrode, ismeasured.
• The voltage measured is proportional to the potential
gradient between the two pick-up electrodes. Point of measurement is halfway between pick-up electrodes(18 feet, 8 inches), making the radius of investigationapproximately equal to the electrode spacing.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 41/81
• Lateral curves are asymmetrical, and onlyapparent resistivity (Ra) is measured.
•The resistivity values must be corrected for Rt.
• For thick beds, the lateral curve will define a bedboundary, depending on type of electrodearrangement.
• Several factors affecting lateral measurementsare:
– Borehole influences (Rm, Rmc, Rmf) are relativelysmall.
– Measurements in thin beds are difficult, if notimpossible.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 42/81
Principle of the Laterolog
• Conventional electrical logging devices need aconductive mud in the borehole to operateproperly.
•
However, when the resistivity contrast Rt/Rm istoo high the response of these devices weakenbecause the measure current gets partially ortotally “shorted out” by the mud column.
• We are concerned with the situation whereresistivity measurements must be made inrelatively high resistivity formations using saltymuds.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 43/81
• Another problem occurs when the formation
consists predominantly of resistive thin beds
because current escapes to adjacent beds andthis produces unwanted signals at the
detectors which obscure the resistivity of the
bed of interest.• To overcome these limitations, “focused”
devices were developed in which the measure
current is contained between two almosthorizontal and parallel surfaces out to a
certain distance from the sonde.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 44/81
• Use is made of auxiliary electrodes, above and
below the measurement electrodes, that
supply currents of the same polarity and arekept at the same potential of the main
electrode to ensure that no current will flow
between them inside the mud column.• Auxiliary electrodes are called “guard” or
“bucking” electrodes.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 45/81
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 46/81
Laterolog Tool
• Arrangement of electrodes to cause a currentto flow horizontally into the formation.
• Laterolog response of a porous and permeable
formation depends upon several factors.• Invasion causes different zones of resistivities.
• So the total resistance measured is the sum of
the resistivities of each zone.• The region of formation that has the highest
resistance, has the greatest influence.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 47/81
• The logging current, Io, can be visualized as asheet of current probing laterally into the
formation.• The depth of penetration is related to the
length of guarding system.
•
There are basically three types of electrodesystem.
– 3 elongate electrodes system (LL3)
– 7 or 8 (small) electrode system (LL7 or LL8)
– Combination (small and elongate) electrodesystem (DLL)
LL3
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 48/81
LL3• LL3 tool has two arrangements of elecetrodes.
– Single electrode
– 3 eclectrodes
Single electrode
• Entire electrode at same potential.
• All current lines leave in adirection perpendicularto the electrode face.
• No spherical distribution of current until at agreat distance.
• Current near the centre of electrode flows in anearly horizontal direction for a considerabledistance.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 49/81
3 l t d
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 50/81
3 electrodes
• same electrode has been divided into three partsseparating the small central section.
• All three pieces are connected to power supply atsame potential.
• The current distribution remains unchanged.
• Only difference is that the current going to thecentre is only measured.
• Since this current is directed into the formation ina horizontal beam, so this will give the resisitvityof the formation against the centre.
• The function of the upper and lower guardelectrodes is to control the current in a horizontalsheet, which is flowing from the centralmeasuring electrode.
• If this divided electrode arrangement is placed in a
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 51/81
• If this divided electrode arrangement is placed in amedium such that the resistivity opposite the centresection is much higher than the resistivity opposite the
two guard sections, the relative amount of current goinginto the guard will increase proportionately, to maintaintotal Io unchanged.
• The direction of current flow will remain unchanged.
•
Therefore as long as the thickness of the resistive streak isgreater than the length of the centre section, themeasurement of the resistivity will be very nearly correct.
• The presence of a mud column around the electrode
makes an insignificant difference in its response, except incases of extremely large holes such as result from caving.
• The current flowing to the central electrode and thepotential of the electrode are measured, and from thesethe resistivity of the formation is estimated.
LL7
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 52/81
LL7
• This laterolog system is comprised of several
small electrodes.• The central electrode Ao is symmetrically
positioned between three pairs of electrodes, M1 & M2, M1’ & M2’ and A1 - A2.
• Each electrode pair is maintained at samepotential.
• A constant current of known intensity is appliedto the centre electrode A
o.
• An auxiliary current of the same polarity sentthrough Ao is applied to electrodes A1A2.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 53/81
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 54/81
• The intensity of the current applied to electrodesA1 and A2 is automatically and continuouslyregulated to maintain the potential differencebetween the two pairs of electrodes, M and M’,essentially at zero.
• When this condition is maintained, the potential
of all A and M electrodes is identical.• The current emanating from the central electrode
Ao is prevented from flowing upward anddownward in the borehole past the electrodes
M1,M2 and M1’ and M2’, by the current from A1A2,and is therefore forced to flow laterally.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 55/81
• This action will produce a sheet of current
whose thickness is approximately equal to the
distance separating the mid points of electrodes M1, M1’ and M2,M2’.
• This sheet of current that emanates from Ao is
bounded by two surfaces, and for some radialdistance from the borehole is reasonably close
to two parallel planes perpendicular to the
axis of the instrument and passing through
the mid points of M1, M1’ and M2,M2’.
D l L t l DLL
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 56/81
Dual Laterolog DLL
• The DLL consists of two Laterologs, a deep and
shallow investigating device, recordedsimultaneously.
Deep Laterolog LLd
•
The LLd is the deepest investigating laterolog.• This tool is needed to extend the range of
formation conditions in which reliabledetermintaons of Rt are possible.
• At the same time it is necessary to obtain goodvertical resolution, for which very long guardelectrodes are needed (28 feet measuredbetween ends of the guard electrodes).
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 57/81
Th l t d i d f d
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 58/81
• The same electrode array is used for deeplaterolog and shallow laterolog, but the currentflows are different.
• In the LLd (deep) mode, the surveying current Io ,that flows from the center electrode, A0, isfocused by bucket currents from electrodes A2 and A2
' supported by A1 and A1'.
• The four "A" electrodes are all connected in thismode.
• The total current returns to the surface “fish”(electrode).
• This arrangement provides strong focusing deepinto the formation.
• Current and voltage are used to computeresistvity.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 59/81
Shallow Laterolog (LLs)
• The shallow Laterolog (LLs) has the same verticalresolution as the deep Laterolog (2 feet), but responds
more strongly to the region affected by invasion.• In the LLs (shallow) mode the bucking currents flow from
A1 to A2 and A1’ to A2’, reducing the depth of investigation. #the same electrodes are used for theshallow device although in a different way.
• The total constant current it is generated downhole andapplied directly to bucking and measure electrodes.
• It is split into two components: Ib going to A1 and Io goingto Ao; both currents return to A2 producing a shallow Io
beam• The electrodes are switched several times per second
from one to the other configuration, and the tworesistivity traces are produced simultaneously.
Sphericall Foc sed Log
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 60/81
Spherically Focused Log• The SFL device measures the conductivity of the
formation near the borehole and provides therelatively shallow investigation required to evaluate theeffects of invasion on deeper resistivity measurements.
• It is the short-spacing device now used on the DIL-SFLtool-developed to replace the 16-in. normal and LL8
devices.• The SFL device is composed of two separate, and more
or less independent, current systems.
• The bucking current system serves to “plug” the
borehole and establish the equipotential spheres.• The ‘I’, survey current system causes an independent
survey current to flow through the “volume of investigation”; the intensity of this current isproportional to formation conductivity.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 61/81
• The SFL device consists of current-emittingelectrodes, current-return electrodes, andmeasure electrodes.
• Two equipotential spheres about the tool’scurrent source are established.
• The first sphere is about 9 in. away from thesurvey current electrode; the other is about 50 in.
away.• A constant potential of 2.5 mV is maintained
between these two spherical surfaces.
• Since the volume of formation between thesetwo surfaces is constant (electrode spacing isfixed) and the voltage drop is constant (2.5 mV),the conductivity of this volume of formation canbe determined by measuring the current flow.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 62/81
INDUCTION LOGGING
• The induction logging tool was originally developed tomeasure formation resistivity in boreholes containingoil-base muds and in air-drilled boreholes.
• Electrode devices did not work in these nonconductive
muds.• Experience soon demonstrated that the induction log
had many advantages over the conventional ES logwhen used for logging wells drilled with water-basemuds.
• Designed for deep investigation, induction logs can befocused in order to minimize the influences of theborehole, the surrounding formations, and the invadedzone
Principle
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 63/81
Principle
• Today’s induction tools have many transmitterand receiver coils.
• However, the principle can be understood byconsidering a sonde with only one transmittercoil and one receiver coil.
• A high-frequency alternating current of constantintensity is sent through a transmitter coil.
• The alternating magnetic field created inducescurrents in the formation surrounding theborehole.
• These currents flow in circular ground loopscoaxial with the transmitter coil and create, inturn, a magnetic field that induces a voltage inthe receiver coil.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 64/81
• Because the alternating current in the transmitter coil
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 65/81
Because the alternating current in the transmitter coilis of constant frequency and amplitude, the groundloop currents are directly proportional to the formationconductivity.
• The voltage induced in the receiver coil is proportionalto the ground loop currents and, therefore, to theconductivity of the formation.
• There is also a direct coupling between the transmitter
and receiver coils.• The signal originating from this coupling is eliminated
by using “bucking” coils.
• The induction tool works best when the borehole fluidis an insulator-even air or gas.
• The tool also works well when the borehole containsconductive mud unless the mud is too salty, theformations are too resistive, or the borehole diameteris too large.
Equipment
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 66/81
Equipment
• The induction tool has been the basic resistivity
tool used in logging low- to medium-resistivityformations drilled with fresh water or oil.
• The 6FF40 induction-electrical survey (IES) toolincluded a six-coil focused induction device of 40-in. nominal spacing (hence, the nomenclature,6FF40), a 16-i% normal, and an SP electrode.
• The DIL-LL8 system used a deep-reading
induction device (the ID, which was similar to the6FF40), a medium induction device (the IM), anLL8 device (which replaces the 16-in. normal),and an SP electrode.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 67/81
• The induction-SFL (ISF) tool incorporated a
deep induction device similar to the 6FF40,
the SFL device, and an SP electrode.
• The DIL-SFL tool is similar to the DIL-LL8 toolexcept that the SFL has replaced the LL8 as the
shallow-investigation device.
• The SFL measurement is less influenced by theborehole than is the LL8 measurement.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 68/81
Log Presentation and Scales
• The induction conductivity curve is sometimes
recorded over both Tracks 2 and 3.
• The linear scale is in millimhos per meter
(mmho/m), increasing to the left.
• The DIlrLL8 log introduced the logarithmic
grid; the standard presentation.
Comparing Laterologs and Induction
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 69/81
Comparing Laterologs and Induction
Logs
• Induction logs provide conductivity (that can beconverted to resistivity).
• Laterologs provide resistivity (that can be
converted to conductivity).• Induction logs work best in wells with low
conductivity fluids.
• Laterologs work best in wells with low resistivity
fluids.• Both logs provide a range of depths of
penetrations and vertical resolutions.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 70/81
MICRORESISTIVITY DEVICES
• Microresistivity devices are used to measure theresistivity of the flushed zone, Rxo and todelineate permeable beds by detecting thepresence of mudcake.
• Measurements of Rxo are important for severalreasons.
• When invasion is moderate to deep, a knowledgeof Rxo allows the deep resistivity measurement to
be corrected to true formation resistivity.• Also, some methods for computing saturation
require the Rxo/Rt, ratio.
T R th t l t h h ll
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 71/81
• To measure Rxo the tool must have a very shallowdepth of investigation because the flushed zonemay extend only a few inches beyond theborehole wall.
• Since the reading should not be affected by theborehole, a sidewall-pad tool is used.
• The pad, carrying short-spaced electrode devices,is pressed against the formation and reduces theshort circuiting effect of the mud.
• Currents from the electrodes on the pad must
pass through the mudcake to reach the flushedzone.
• Microresistivity logs are scaled in resistivity units.
Microlog
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 72/81
Microlog
• The microlog (ML) is a rubber pad with three button
electrodes placed in a line with a 1 inch spacing .• A known current is emitted from electrode A, and the
potential differences between electrodes M1 and M2 andbetween M2 and a surface electrode are measured.
•
The two resulting curves are called the 2” normal curve(ML) and the 1½“ inverse curve (MIV).
• The radius of investigation is smaller for the second of these two curves, and hence is more affected by mudcake.
•
The difference between the two curves is an indicator of mudcake, and hence bed boundaries.
• The tool is pad mounted, and the distance across the padsis also recorded, giving an additional caliper measurement
(the micro-caliper log).
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 73/81
The Microlaterolog
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 74/81
• The microlaterolog (MLL) is the micro-scale version of thelaterolog, and hence incorporates a current focusing system.
•The tool is pad mounted, and has a central button electrodethat emits a known measurement current surroundedcoaxially by two ring shaped monitoring electrodes, and aring-shaped guard electrode that produces a bucking currentas in the DLL.
• The spacing between electrodes is about 1 inch.• The tool operates in the same way as the LL7. The focused
current beam that is produced from the central electrodehas a diameter of about 1½ inches and penetrates directly
into the formation.• The influence of mudcake is negligible for mudcakes less
than 3/8” thick, and in these conditions RXO can bemeasured.
• The depth of investigation of the MLL is about 4 inches.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 75/81
The Proximity Log
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 76/81
The Proximity Log
• The proximity log (PL) was developed from the
MLL to overcome problems with mudcakes over3/8” thick, and is used to measure RXO.
• The device is similar, except that it is larger than
the MLL and the functions of the centralelectrode and the first monitoring ring electrodeare combined into a central button electrode.
• The tool operates in a similar fashion to the LL3.
• It has a depth of penetration of 1½ ft., and is notaffected by mudcake.
• It may, however, be affected by Rt when theinvasion depth is small.
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 77/81
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 78/81
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 79/81
Investigation Depth
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 80/81
Investigation Depth
7/29/2019 Resistivity Logging.pptx
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/resistivity-loggingpptx 81/81
Uses
• Recognition of Hydrocarbon Zones
• Calculation of Water Saturation
• Facies Recognition
• Correlation
• Lithology Recognition