Post on 06-Apr-2018
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
1/28
1
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Objective of the Study
To understand the existing employee engagement and Reward Programs To analyze the effect of employee engagement and Reward Recognition activities on job
satisfaction of employees
1.2. Theoretical Framework
1.2.1 Definition
A business management concept that describes the level of enthusiasm and dedication a
worker feels toward his/her job. Engaged employee cares their work and about the
performance of the company and feels that their efforts make a difference. An engaged
employee is in it for more than a paycheck.
1.2.2 Origin
Engagement at work was conceptualized by Kahn, (1990) as the harnessing of
organizational members selves to their work roles. In engagement, people employ and
express themselves physically, cognitively, and emotionally during role performances.
The second related construct to engagement in organizational behavior is the notion of
flow advanced by Csikszentmihalyi (1975, 1990). Csikzentmihalyi (1975) defines flow as
the holistic sensation that, people feel when they act with total involvement. Flow is the
state in which there is little distinction between the self and environment. When
individuals are in Flow State little conscious control is necessary for their actions.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
2/28
2
Employee engagement is the thus the level of commitment and involvement an employee
has towards their organization and its values. An engaged employee is aware of business
context, and works with colleagues to improve performance within the job for the benefit
of the organization. The organization must work to develop and nurture engagement,
which requires a two-way relationship between employer and employee. Thus Employee
engagement is a barometer that determines the association of a person with the
organization
Engagement is most closely associated with the existing construction of job involvement
(Brown 1996) and flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990). Job involvement is defined as the
degree to which the job situation is central to the person and his or her identity (Lawler &
Hall, 1970). Kanungo (1982) maintained that job involvement is a Cognitive or belief
state of Psychological identification. Job involvement is thought to depend on both need
saliency and the potential of a job to satisfy these needs. Thus job involvement results
form a cognitive judgment about the needs satisfying abilities of the job. Jobs in this view
are tied to ones self-image. Engagement differs from job in as it is concerned more with
how the individual employees his/her self during the performance of his / her job.
Furthermore engagement entails the active use of emotions. Finally engagement may be
thought of as an antecedent to job involvement in that individuals who experience deep
engagement in their roles should come to identify with their jobs.
When Kahn talked about employee engagement he has given importance to all three
aspects physically, cognitively and emotionally, where as in job satisfaction importance
has been more given to cognitive side.
HR practitioners believe that the engagement challenge has a lot to do with how
employee feels about the about work experience and how he or she is treated in the
organization. It has a lot to do with emotions which are fundamentally related to drive
bottom line success in a company. There will always be people who never give their best
efforts no matter how hard HR and line managers try to engage them. But for the most
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
3/28
3
part employees want to commit to companies because doing so satisfies a powerful and a
basic need in connect with and contribute to something significant.
1.2.3 Aspects of Employee Engagement
Three basic aspects of employee engagement according to the global studies are:-
The employees and their own unique psychological make-up and experience. The employers and their ability to create the conditions that promote employee
engagement.
Interaction between employees at all levels.Thus it is largely the organizations responsibility to create an environment and culture
conducive to this partnership, and a win-win equation.
1.2.4 Categories of Employee Engagement
According to the Gallup the Consulting organization there are different types of people:-
Engaged--"Engaged" employees are builders. They want to know the desiredexpectations for their role so they can meet and exceed them. They're naturally
curious about their company and their place in it. They perform at consistently high
levels. They want to use their talents and strengths at work every day. They work
with passion and they drive innovation and move their organization forward.
Not Engaged---Not-engaged employees tend to concentrate on tasks rather thanthe goals and outcomes they are expected to accomplish. They want to be told what to
do just so they can do it and say they have finished. They focus on accomplishing
tasks vs. achieving an outcome. Employees who are not-engaged tend to feel their
contributions are being overlooked, and their potential is not being tapped. They often
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
4/28
4
feel this way because they don't have productive relationships with their managers or
with their coworkers.
Actively Disengaged--The "actively disengaged" employees are the "cavedwellers." They're "Consistently against Virtually Everything." They're not just
unhappy at work; they're busy acting out their unhappiness .They sow seeds of
negativity at every opportunity. Every day, actively disengaged workers undermine
what their engaged coworkers accomplish. As workers increasingly rely on each
other to generate products and services, the problems and tensions that are fostered
by actively disengaged workers can cause great damage to an organization's
functioning.
1.2.5 Importance of Engagement
Engagement is important for managers to cultivate given that disengagement or
alienation is central to the problem of workers lack of commitment and motivation
(Aktouf). Meaningless work is often associated with apathy and detachment from ones
works (Thomas and Velthouse). In such conditions, individuals are thought to be
estranged from their selves (Seeman, 1972) .Other Research using a different resource of
engagement (involvement and enthusiasm) has linked it to such variables as employee
turnover, customer satisfaction loyalty, safety and to a lesser degree, productivity and
profitability criteria (Harter, Schnidt & Hayes, 2002).
An organizations capacity to manage employee engagement is closely related to its
ability to achieve high performance levels and superior business results. Some of the
advantages of Engaged employees are:-
Engaged employees will stay with the company, be an advocate of the companyand its products and services, and contribute to bottom line business success.
They will normally perform better and are more motivated. There is a significant link between employee engagement and profitability.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
5/28
5
They form an emotional connection with the company. This impacts their attitudetowards the companys clients, and thereby improves customer satisfaction and
service levels.
It builds passion, commitment and alignment with the organizations strategiesand goals.
Increases employees trust in the organization. Creates a sense of loyalty in a competitive environment. Provides a high-energy working environment. Boosts business growth. Makes the employees effective brand ambassadors for the company.
A highly engaged employee will consistently deliver beyond expectations. Thus
employee engagement is critical to any organization that seeks to retain valued
employees. The Watson Wyatt consulting companies has been proved that there is an
intrinsic link between employee engagement, customer loyalty, and profitability. As
organizations globalize and become more dependent on technology in a virtual working
environment, there is a greater need to connect and engage with employees to provide
them with an organizational identity.
1.2.6 Factors Leading to Employee Engagement
Studies have shown that there are some critical factors which lead to Employee
Engagement. Some of them identified are:-
Career Development- Opportunities for Personal DevelopmentOrganizations with high levels of engagement provide employees with
opportunities to develop their abilities, learn new skills, acquire new knowledge
and realise their potential. When companies plan for the career paths of their
employees and invest in them in this way their people invest in them.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
6/28
6
Career DevelopmentEffective Management of TalentCareer development influences engagement for employees and retaining the most
talented employees and providing opportunities for personal development.
Leadership- Clarity of Company ValuesEmployees need to feel that the core values for which their companies stand are
unambiguous and clear.
LeadershipRespectful Treatment of EmployeesSuccessful organizations show respect for each employees qualities and
contributionregardless of their job level.
LeadershipCompanys Standards of Ethical BehaviourA companys ethical standards also lead to engagement of an individual
EmpowermentEmployees want to be involved in decisions that affect their work. The leaders of
high engagement workplaces create a trustful and challenging environment, in
which employees are encouraged to dissent from the prevailing orthodoxy and to
input and innovate to move the organization forward.
ImageHow much employees are prepared to endorse the products and services which
their company provides its customers depends largely on their perceptions of the
quality of those goods and services. High levels of employee engagement are
inextricably linked with high levels of customer engagement.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
7/28
7
Figure 1.2.6.1- Factors leading to Employee Engagement
Career Development - Opportunities for
personal development
Career Development Effective
Management of talent
LeadershipRespectful treatment
of employees
LeadershipCompanys standards
of ethical behaviour
Leadership- Clarity of company
Values
Empowerment
Image
Equal opportunities & fair treatment
Performance Appraisal
Pay & benefits
Health & Safety
Job satisfaction
Communication
Family friendliness
Co-operation
Feeling valued& Involved
E
N
GA
G
E
ME
N
T
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
8/28
8
Other factors
Equal Opportunities and Fair TreatmentThe employee engagement levels would be high if their bosses (superiors) provide
equal opportunities for growth and advancement to all the employees
Performance appraisalFair evaluation of an employees performance is an important criterion for
determining the level of employee engagement. The company which follows an
appropriate performance appraisal technique (which is transparent and not biased)
will have high levels of employee engagement.
Pay and BenefitsThe company should have a proper pay system so that the employees are
motivated to work in the organization. In order to boost his engagement levels the
employees should also be provided with certain benefits and compensations.
Health and SafetyResearch indicates that the engagement levels are low if the employee does not
feel secure while working. Therefore every organization should adopt appropriatemethods and systems for the health and safety of their employees.
Job SatisfactionOnly a satisfied employee can become an engaged employee. Therefore it is very
essential for an organization to see to it that the job given to the employee
matches his career goals which will make him enjoy his work and he would
ultimately be satisfied with his job.
CommunicationThe company should follow the open door policy. There should be both upward
and downward communication with the use of appropriate communication
channels in the organization. If the employee is given a say in the decision making
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
9/28
9
and has the right to be heard by his boss than the engagement levels are likely to
be high.
Family FriendlinessA persons family life influences his wok life. When an employee realizes that the
organization is considering his familys benefits also, he will have an emotional
attachment with the organization which leads to engagement
Co-operationIf the entire organization works together by helping each other i.e. all the
employees as well as the supervisors co-ordinate well than the employees will be
engaged.
1.2.7 How to measure Employee Engagement?
Gallup research consistently confirms that engaged work places compared with least
engaged are much more likely to have lower employee turnover, higher than average
customer loyalty, above average productivity and earnings. These are all good things thatprove that engaging and involving employees make good business sense and building
shareholder value. Negative workplace relationships may be a big part of why so many
employees are not engaged and satisfied with their jobs.
Step I: ListenThe employer must listen to his employees and remember that this is a continuous
process. The information employees supply will provide direction. This is the
only way to identify their specific concerns. When leaders listen, employees
respond by becoming more engaged. This results in increased productivity and
employee retention. Engaged employees are much more likely to be satisfied in
their positions, remain with the company, be promoted, and strive for higher
levels of performance.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
10/28
10
Step II: Measure current level of employee engagementEmployee engagement needs to be measured at regular intervals in order to track
its contribution to the success of the organisation.
But measuring the engagement (feedback through surveys) without planning how
to handle the result can lead employees to disengage. It is therefore not enough to
feel the pulsethe action plan is just as essential.
Step II1: - Identify the problem areasIdentify the problem areas to see which are the exact areas, which lead to
disengaged employees
Step IV: Taking action to improve employee engagement by acting upon theproblem areas
Nothing is more discouraging to employees than to be asked for their feedback
and see no movement toward resolution of their issues. Even the smallest actions
taken to address concerns will let the staff know how their input is valued. Feeling
valued will boost morale, motivate and encourage future input. Taking action
starts with listening to employee feedback and a definitive action plan will need tobe put in place finally.
1.2.8 Employee Satisfaction
Employee Satisfactionis a prerequisite for the customer satisfaction. Enhanced employee
satisfaction leads to higher level of employee retention. A stable and committed
workforce ensures successful knowledge transfer, sharing, and creation - a key tocontinuous improvement, innovation, and knowledge-based total customer satisfaction.
When companies are committed with providing high quality products and services; when
companies set high work standards for their employees; and when employees are
empowered through training and development, provided with knowledge and
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
11/28
11
information, permitted to make mistakes without punishment, and trusted; they will
experience an increase in their level of satisfaction at work.
This level of satisfaction can be enhanced further if teamwork engagement activities and
visionary leadership are introduced.
1.2.9 How to Increase Job Satisfaction--The Pride System?
The leaders of the organization have the responsibility for creating a high level of job
satisfaction. Deming said, "The aim of leadership should be to improve the performance
of man and machine, to improve quality, to increase output, and simultaneously to bring
pride of workmanship to people." A motivating environment is one that gives workers a
sense of pride in what they do. To show supervisors and managers how to build a more
productive work environment, a five-step process called the PRIDE system is created.
Leaders can improve motivation within their organizations by following this process:
Provide a positive working environment Reward and recognition Involve and increase employee engagement Develop the skills and potential of your workforce Evaluate and measure job satisfaction
Step 1--Provide a Positive Working Environment
Increasing job satisfaction begins by first providing a positive work environment. Fran
Tarkenton says, to find what motivates people, "you have to find what turns people on."
This is the most important factor in the process. A motivating working environment
requires going over and beyond the call of duty and providing for the needs of the
worker.
Walt Disney World Company provides an excellent work environment for their
employees or "cast members." Employee assistance centers are spread strategically
across the theme park. Some of the services included employee discount programs,
childcare information, money orders, postage stamps, check cashing, and bus passes.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
12/28
12
The Walt Disney Company realizes that taking care of their employee's needs keep them
motivated, on the job and loyal to the company.
Step 2--Reward and Recognition for Increasing Job Satisfaction
Mark Twain once said, "I can live for two months on a good compliment." Personal
recognition is a powerful tool in building morale and motivation. A pat on the back, a
personal note from a peer or a supervisor does wonders. Small, informal celebrations are
many times more effective than a once a quarter or once a year formal event.
Graham Weston, co-founder and CEO of Rackspace Managed Hosting, gives the keys to
his BMW M3 convertible for a week to his top performing employees. This creative way
to reward employees has a bigger impact than cash. He says, If you gave somebody a
$200 bonus, it wouldnt mean very much. When someone gets to drive my car for a
week, they never forget it.
Step 3--Involve Everyone and Use Employee Engagement
People may show up for work, but are they engaged and productive? People are more
committed and engaged when there is a process for them to contribute their ideas and
employee suggestions. This gives them a sense of ownership and pride in their work.
The Sony Corporation fosters the exchange of ideas within departments by sponsoring an
annual Idea Exposition. During the exposition, scientists and engineers display projects
and ideas they are working on. Open only to Sonys employees, this process creates a
healthy climate of innovation and engages all those who participate.
Step 4--Develop Worker's Skills and Potential
Training and education motivates people and makes them more productive and
innovative. At Federal Express, all customer contact people are given six weeks of
training before they ever answer the first phone call. Learning never stops and testing
continues throughout their employment tenure. Every six months customer service
people are tested using an on-line computer system. Pass/fail results are sent to each
employee within 24 hours. They receive a personalized "prescription" on areas that need
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
13/28
13
reviewing with a list of resources and lessons that will help. Federal Express' intensive
training and development program has resulted in higher motivation and lower turnover.
There are many reasons training and development makes sense. Well-trained employees
are more capable and willing to assume more control over their jobs. They need less
supervision, which frees management for other tasks. Employees are more capable to
answer the questions of customers which builds better customer loyalty. Employees who
understand the business, complain less, are more satisfied, and are more motivated. All
this leads to better management-employee relationships.
Step 5--Evaluate and Measure Job Satisfaction
Continuous evaluation and never ending improvement is the final step of the PRIDE
system. Evaluation is a nonstop activity that includes a specific cycle of steps. The
primary purpose of evaluation is to measure progress and determine what needs
improving. Continuous evaluation includes, but is not limited to, the measurement of
attitudes, morale, and motivation of the workforce. It includes the identification of
problem areas needing improvement and the design and implementation of an
improvement plan. Good organizations conduct a job satisfaction survey at least once a
year.
1.2.10 Factors Driving Employee Satisfaction
1. Intention to remain with the organization
Employees that express an intention to stay with a company are more likely to also feel
satisfied with their role and position. A high correlation has been found between job
satisfaction scores and employee retention rates.
2. Variety of skills used in their job
Employees feel more satisfied in roles that require a wide range of personal skills and
competencies. The work itself is more interesting and employees feel accomplished when
theyve been given the opportunity get to grow and develop a valuable skill set.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
14/28
14
3. Level of organizational customer-service orientation
Employees are more satisfied working for organizations that they believe have the best
interests of customers in mind and that they have a role in identifying and satisfying the
needs of those customers. This is consistent with the high correlation been found between
levels of employee satisfaction and customer satisfaction in other studies.
4. Coordination between units of the organization
Employees feel more satisfied being a part of a well-managed organization. In companies
that communicate and coordinate well between departments and business units, there are
fewer disruptions, delays, and needs for damage control.
1.2.11 Factors Driving Employee Engagement
1. Role conflicts
Similar to #4 above, employees feel better working in an organization that has policies
and processes that are consistent with one another and that employees understand are
appropriate. Employees tend to disengage if asked to blindly follow instructions that they
feel are incorrect or enforce management policies that they feel are in conflict with one
another.
2. Effective training
Effective initial and ongoing training can get employees engaged in their work. New
employees that are given thorough orientation and training can take their new skills and
start performing in their role with confidence. Ongoing training demonstrates that the
organization values the employee in their current role as well as their potential for future
personal development.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
15/28
15
3. Personal autonomy
When a capable employee is afforded freedom, authority and discretion to execute their
role optimally they tend to engage and take ownership of their job. The organization must
also provide support in the form of resources, information and training.
4. Manager ability
Employee engagement is influenced by the style, strengths and weaknesses of their
supervisors. The study cites three areas of managerial ability that can have a positive
impact on employee engagement: Expert power (technical expertise or managerial
competence of the manager), Referent power (the respect that the employee has for their
supervisors), and Exchange power (a supervisors willingness to be influenced by the
employee.
These drivers are all basically related to feelings an employee has towards their role (and
the organization) with regard to personal value, respect, and freedom. In summary,
employee engagement is largely driven a feeling that the organization values his/her
contribution, and that it is doing its best to remove barriers from getting the job done the
right way.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
16/28
16
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
2.1 Introduction
Brooke, Russell, and Price (1988) performed two sets of confirmatory factor analyses that
illustrated discriminant validity among measures of job involvement, job satisfaction, and
organizational commitment. In the first set of analyses, Brooke et al. demonstrated that
indicators of the three variables better fit a three-factor model then they did a single-
factor model. In a second set of analyses, Brooke et al. demonstrated that the correlations
between seven other variables and the three affective responses were not uniform,thereby providing additional evidence for the discriminated validity of the measures.
The purpose of the present study was to present a constructive replication of Brooke et
al.'s study with data drawn from two different employee populations. We also
investigated the relationship between job involvement, job satisfaction, and
organizational commitment and correlates different from those that Brooke et al. used in
order to broaden the scope of the collective findings. Given the number of claims that
measures of these three variables lack discriminated validity, it is important to replicate
Brooke et al.'s findings and to extend them to different populations and additional
correlates.
According to Koscec M. (2003) that overall employee satisfaction is manifest in the
level of engagement that employees have in their work. In other words, employee
engagement was the ultimate expression of employee commitment, loyalty, morale and
overall employee satisfaction. Therefore organizations needed to focus on employee
engagement rather than on these other components of employee satisfaction. This help to
shed additional insight into the difference between measuring employee satisfaction and
employee engagement. Measuring satisfaction is measuring a passive employee state,
while measuring engagement is measuring an active state.
A fully engaged employee that is enthusiastic about their work is creative, innovative and
wants to contribute might indicate a lower level of satisfaction with the same
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
17/28
17
organization, as the disengaged employee. When a company measures employee
satisfaction are they getting data that provides them with meaningful information that will
allow them to improve their competitive advantage and profitability? The simple answer
is that they are not. This is why they need to focus on employee engagement and
understand the principle components of employee engagement.
According to May et al., (2004) engagement is most closely associated with the
constructs of job involvement and flow (Csikszentmihalyi 1990). Job involvement is
defined as a cognitive or belief state of psychological identification (Kanungo
1982:342). This differs from engagement in that it is concerned more with how the
individual employs him/her self during the performance of his/her job. Furthermore,
whilst the focus of job involvement is on cognitions, engagement, according to most
definitions, also encompasses emotions and behaviours.
Research by Wyatt (2006) suggests that employee engagement has a strong impact on an
organizations bottom line. Unfortunately, a number of myths, misconceptions and false
assumptions are leading employers down the wrong path when it comes to building
employee engagement. As a result, many are investing time and money in ways that will
do little to increase engagement levels. In doing so, these employers are missing out on
an opportunity to motivate and focus employees in ways that have a real impact on
productivity and financial performance.
In particular, many companies overestimate the importance of the supervisor in driving
engagement. In fact, senior leadership and the frequency with which senior managers
communicate with employees are far more important drivers of engagement.
Understanding this and acting upon it can deliver substantial improvements in financial
performance and productivity.
The study also shows that while employee engagement provides a solid foundation for
financial success, employers should look beyond engagement if they are going to achieve
superior financial performance. The ultimate goal should be employee effectiveness,
which builds on the engagement foundation by giving employees the training, resources,
tools and equipment to work effectively and by creating an environment where the
organization demonstrates its values, and creates a culture of trust and ethical behaviour.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
18/28
18
According to Rich and Louis B. (2006) Job engagement has recently become a
fashionable term among Human Resource practitioners and Organizational Behavior
researchers. However, academic research that has theoretically examined job engagement
at the psychological level is limited, as is research on the nature of employee
engagement, and its place among other job attitude constructs that are used to describe
employees at work. I developed and validated a new measure of job engagement that
assessed people's engagement during role performance. The predictive, convergent, and
discriminate validity of job engagement was assessed with similar affective and cognitive
work-related states, including job involvement, job satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and
the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.
Results from confirmatory factor analysis indicated that job engagement was bestrepresented as a higher-order factor with three lower-order dimensions of physical,
emotional, and cognitive. Additional analyses suggested that the four job attitudes of job
engagement, job satisfaction, job involvement, and intrinsic motivation are distinct but
correlated attitudes. Hierarchical regression results revealed that employees who
exhibited higher levels of job engagement were rated by their supervisors as
demonstrating higher levels of task and contextual performance and lower levels of
withdrawal behaviors. Importantly, these relationships were found after controlling for
job satisfaction, job involvement, and intrinsic motivation. Specifically, job engagement
predicted an additional 3% variance in task performance, an additional 4% variance in
contextual performance, and an additional 10% variance in withdrawal behaviors.
Moreover, job engagement predicted an additional 3% variance in task performance, an
additional 6% variance in contextual performance, and an additional 7% variance in
withdrawal behaviors over and above that predicted by the Utrecht Work Engagement
Scale. Rich et al concluded with theoretical and practical implications as well as
suggestions for future research.
Avery et al., (2007) have stressed the importance of creating conditions for meaningful
employee expression in work roles, also known as engagement. Few empirical studies,
however, have examined how individual or situational factors relate to engagement.
Consequently, this study examines the interplay between employee age, perceived
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
19/28
19
coworker age composition, and satisfaction with older (older than 55) and younger
(younger than 40) coworkers on engagement using a sample of 901 individuals employed
in the United Kingdom. Results indicated that satisfaction with one's coworkers related
significantly to engagement. Moreover, perceived age similarity was associated with
higher levels of engagement among older workers when they were highly satisfied with
their coworkers over 55 and lower levels of engagement when they were not.
According to Macey and Schneider (2008) employee engagement is ambiguous among
both academic researchers and among practitioners who use it in conversations with
clients. They show that the term is used at different times to refer to psychological states,
traits, and behaviors as well as their antecedents and outcomes. Drawing on diverse
relevant literatures, they offer a series of propositions about (a) psychological state
engagement; (b) behavioral engagement; and (c) trait engagement. In addition, they offer
propositions regarding the effects of job attributes and leadership as main effects on state
and behavioral engagement and as moderators of the relationships among the 3 facets of
engagement.
The notion of employee engagement is a relatively new one, one that has been heavily
marketed by human resource (HR) consulting firms that offer advice on how it can be
created and leveraged. Academic researchers are now slowly joining the fray, and both
parties are saddled with competing and inconsistent interpretations of the meaning of the
construct. We conclude with thoughts about the measurement of the 3 facets of
engagement and potential antecedents, especially measurement via employee surveys.
Richman et al., (2008) examined the relationship of perceived workplace flexibility and
supportive work life policies to employee engagement and expectations to remain with
the organization (expected retention). It also explores the association of formal and
occasional (informal) use of flexibility with these outcomes. Data are from a multi-
organization database created by WFD Consulting of studies conducted between 1996
and 2006. Results revealed that perceived flexibility and supportive work life policies
were related to greater employee engagement and longer than expected retention.
Employee engagement fully mediated the relationship between perceived flexibility and
expected retention and partially mediated the relationship between supportive work life
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
20/28
20
policies and expected retention. Both formal and occasional uses of flexibility were
positively associated with perceived flexibility, employee engagement, and expected
retention. These analyses provide evidence that workplace flexibility may enhance
employee engagement, which may in turn lead to longer job tenure.
Hermsen et al., (2008) examined that staff members are a large and growing set of
employees within higher education. While their numbers are growing, they also are
seeing a change in their salaries and working conditions. Given this situation, institutions
are considering work engagement and job satisfaction research as they seek to increase
motivation and productivity. The purpose of this article is to examine those work life
perceptions, identity issues and demographic and profile characteristics that explain the
work engagement and job satisfaction of higher education staff members.
Wefald et al., (2009) broadly defined engagement as involvement, satisfaction, and
enthusiasm, is widely used by organizations and consultants for improving retention.
However, engagement fails to meet many of the common criteria for positive
organizational practice, i.e. theoretical, valid, unique, state-like, and positive. With
attention to these criteria, engagement may useful to management.According to Markos and Sridevi (2010) Employee engagement is a vast construct that
touches almost all parts of human resource management facets we know hitherto. If every
part of human resources is not addressed in appropriate manner, employees fail to fully
engage themselves in their job in the response to such kind of mismanagement. The
construct employee engagement is built on the foundation of earlier concepts like job
satisfaction, employee commitment and Organizational citizenship behaviour. Though it
is related to and encompasses these concepts, employee engagement is broader in scope.
Employee engagement is stronger predictor of positive organizational performance
clearly showing the two-way relationship between employer and employee compared to
the three earlier constructs: job satisfaction, employee commitment and organizational
citizenship behaviour. Engaged employees are emotionally attached to their organization
and highly involved in their job with a great enthusiasm for the success of their employer,
going extra mile beyond the employment contractual agreement. Employee engagement
is closely linked with organizational performance outcomes.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
21/28
21
Companies with engaged employees have higher employee retention as a result of
reduced turnover and reduced intention to leave the company, productivity, profitability,
growth and customer satisfaction. On the other hand, companies with disengaged
employees suffer from waste of effort and bleed talent, earn less commitment from the
employees, face increased absenteeism and have less customer orientation, less
productivity, and reduced operating margins and net profit margins. Most researches
emphasize merely the importance and positive impacts of employee engagement on the
business outcomes, failing to provide the cost-benefit analysis for engagement decisions.
As any other management decisions, engagement decision should be evaluated in terms
of both its benefits and its associated costs, without giving greater emphasis to neither of
the two, not to bias the decision makers. Thus there is a need to study the cost aspect of
engagement decisions. The remarkable fact is, the findings of today's researches, can be
used as comer stone for the building of complete essence to the construct. Furthermore,
much of the works related to "employee engagement" construct is attributed to survey
houses and consultancies. Therefore, there is a need for academia to investigate this new
construct and come up with a clear definition and dimensions that will be used for
measuring employee engagement justifying the importance of engagement concept.
Otherwise, it will pass away shortly as many other human resource fads did.
Findings of various researches suggest their own strategies in order to keep employees
engaged. Here in this article ten points or strategies called 'the ten tablets" were suggested
to keep employees engaged. For managers, work of employee engagement starts at day
one through effective recruitment and orientation program, the work of employee
engagement begins from the top as it is unthinkable to have engaged people in the
organizations where there are no engaged leadership.
According to Lakshmi et al., (2010) Employee engagement is the level of commitment
and involvement an employee has towards their organization and its values, Employees
willingness and ability to contribute towards the company success. Engagement is about
encouraging employees to have passion for their work and identifying the organization as
more than a place to earn money. Employees are motivated by jobs that challenge them
and enable them to grow and learn in the concern field. The main objective of the survey
is to know in detail about level of employees engagement in academic institutions. The
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
22/28
22
survey focuses on analysis and interpretation of responses towards the drivers of
Employee Engagement.
According to Swaminathan and Rajasekaran (2010) Employee Engagement is the
combination of Job Satisfaction, Motivation and Effectiveness. In other words it is the
ecstatic feeling that one may get by doing his job. It is a very important topic as the value
of the organization is transferred from physical asset to effective work force. Employee
Engagement is an important area that an organization should concentrate to be productive
and to get effective, loyal, and committed work force. For collecting the primary data, a
structured questionnaire, comprising of multiple choice and close-ended questions was
administered to 80 employees in the organization using non proportionate stratified
random sampling method. In this study multiple regression, correlation and ANOVA
have been used to analyze and interpret the data collected.
According to Thiagarajan and Renugadevi (2011) conducted research on the employee
engagement and key research on engagement related factors in BPO Industries in India.
The author s conducted a literature search on employee engagement and interviews with
126 executives. Career development, performance appraisal and motivation factors are
connected to employee engagement. The implications are that leaders should be educated
on engagement, career development opportunities are particularly important and that
performance improvement should champion work life balance, these practices are useful
to increase engagement. The purpose of this two-part article is to introduce engagement
and review key research on engagement-related factors. The author conducted a literature
search on employee engagement and pilot interviews with ten professionals.
Environment, leadership, job, and individual factors are connected to employee
engagement. Environmental engagement factors include congruency between
organizational and individual values, the quality of the workplace relationships, and
work-life balance. Leadership engagement factors include vision and integrity. Job
engagement factors include the meaningfulness of the job, its level of challenge, and the
amount of control the employee has on the job. Finally, individual factors related to
engagement include resilience, locus of control, active coping style, self-esteem,
neuroticism, and extraversion. The author suggests that the connections (or the match)
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
23/28
23
between organizational, leadership, job, and individual characteristics is particularly
relevant for engagement.
According to Kelleher B. (2011) a common theme of business leaders and human
resources professionals is as follows: We are in tough times, but thankfully, our
employees are hanging in there with voluntary turnover numbers at record lows. But he
says Beware! Any companys turnover metrics might be akin to fools gold, because
there is a high probability, there work environment did not suddenly turn to Camelot. He
explains quite simply that, employees had no place to go, so they stayed up. Companies
have been in survival mode, with shrinking backlog, cost cutting, and layoffs being the
norm during this recessionary window. This lack of growth, coupled with fear and
insecurity. He says I dont want to be anyones low man on the totem pole, resulted in
historic staff turnover lows in all industries. He says Workforce experts are reporting that
the majority of companies reduced their voluntary turnover by two thirds (e.g., if any
companies historic turnover was 15%, and now it 5%).Now that were seeing an
economic recovery, employees are gaining confidence in the job market. Are your
employees beginning to look for new a new job?
This extended downturn in the economy has taken its toll. Training budgets have been
slashed, wages frozen, and promotions delayed as employees were asked to do more
with less. He is projecting that were entering the era of the disengaged as many
employees seek alternatives elsewhere. Companies will start hiring again soon,
employees will again believe that it is OK to be someones low man on the totem pole,
and the musical chair aspect of job movement will take root. He asks all companies Is
your company prepared? He also projects that firms will not simply return to their
prerecession turnover levels. For instance, if a companys traditional voluntary turnover
dropped from 15%, to 5%, the 10% of the workforce that didnt leave during the past
year is now in queue, and will be in addition to your traditional 15% voluntary turnover.
Can companies handle turnover levels of 25% or higher? How will this impact employee
engagement, client satisfaction, or your bottom line?
He is not being an alarmist. In Deloittes September 2009 Special Report, Managing
Talent in a Turbulent Economy survey, respondents revealed the following statistics that
should keep leaders and human resources executives awake at night:
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
24/28
24
- Nearly half (49%) of employees surveyed in August are either looking for a new job
or plan to do so after the recession ends.
- 22% of surveyed Generation X employees have been actively job hunting over the
past year
- Among surveyed Generation X members, only 37% plan to stay with their current
employer, 44% of surveyed Generation Y members expect to remain in their current job.
He anticipates significant job movement in the months ahead. Retention and engagement
investment should not be analogous to a light switchcompanies shouldnt just turn
them on or off.
Every company need to have a strategy in place that can sustain the good times, and the
not so good times. He suggest think of your engagement investments and efforts as a
dimmer switchduring financially challenging times, you lower slightly, and during
boom times, you elevate slightly, while continuously communicating with your
employees the realities of your business challenges and successes.
Companies should focus on engagement and retention strategies today to prepare for
tomorrow and adopt the following 10 engagement practices:
1. Link Engagement Efforts To High PerformanceEngagement is the unlocking of employee potential to drive high performance.
Employee satisfaction is an outcome of a great culture and should not be the ultimate
goal.
2. Engagement Starts at the Top
Most studies show that actions of senior leaders are a key engagement driver.
3. Engage First-Line Leaders
The old adage, employees join great companies but quit bad managers is true.
4. Plan Robust Communication
Successful leaders recognize the power of a robust communication plan built on clarity,
consistency, and transparency.
5. Individualize Engagement
It is no longer treat people they way you want to be treated but rather treat people the
way they want to be treated
6. Create a Motivational Culture
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
25/28
25
You are more apt to get the discretionary effort of your employees when they think you
care about them as people.
7. Create Feedback Mechanisms
The latest research by the Corporate Leadership Council is staggering: only 5.9% of
surveyed employees are giving their employers high levels of discretionary effort.
8. Reinforce and Reward the Right Behaviors
Employees are incredibly motivated by achievement, not money, but money can
disengage if employees perceive unfairness.
9. Track and Communicate Progress
It is amazing how few companies have balanced scorecards in place. You need to
reinforce line of sight by telling your employees where were going, how were
performing, and where they fit in.
10. Hire and Promote Behaviours and Traits for Your Culture
I often tell clients, You dont have an engagement issue; you have a hiring issue youre
hiring the wrong behaviours and traits to succeed in your culture.
According to Sterling M. (2011) if you want to Enhance Employee Engagement?
Ask Three Critical Questions:-
1. Do your employees have the capacity to be engaged?In their book, The Power of Full Engagement, authors Loehr Jim and Schwartz Tony
argue that the means to engagement is found in a persons ability to effectively manage
energy. The authors go on to describe four distinct concepts you can measure an
individuals capacity for engagement: by determining are they physically energized,
emotionally connected, mentally focused, and spiritually aligned. If employees dont
have the capacity to be engaged, it really doesnt matter if you rearrange the furniture or
rewrite the corporate mission statement, you wont be able to solve their low engagement
levels.
2. Are your managers trained for engagement?Asking these questions can help anyone to know what their manager think of word
engagement What does employee engagement look like? and How do you personally
model and support engagement? The Gallup Organizations research clearly lists which
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
26/28
26
manager behaviours enhance workplace perceptions. These are the same behaviours
managers are held accountable for and evaluated on in most engagement surveys.
Managers need some new guidelines for helping employees find and filter out the
information they need to do their jobs, rather than adding to their informationoverload.
This improved communication skill of proper timing, context and transparency isdirectly
related to employees workplace perceptions, and their engagement.
3. Does your organization have a culture for engagement? All organization should ask these question to itself What is your motivation for
measuring employee engagement? or How do you use your engagement results?
Many times the answers to these questions tell me whether or not the culture is serious
about engagement for its intended purpose: to create a workplace environment that
facilitates top performance.
Because we have moved into a new decade of employee engagement surveys, as
technological advances continue to accelerate the speed of change in the workplace and
as demands on employees continue to increase, having an engaged workforce continues
to be a key differentiator. No company should be satisfied with average results. They
should help their employees by better management and expand their energy capacity.
Train there managers to communicate for engagement and ensure that their corporate
culture models the values they measure.
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
27/28
27
REFERENCES
Avery, Derek R., McKay, Patrick F., Wilson, David C. (2007), Engaging the aging
workforce: The relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with
coworkers, and employee engagement; Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol 92(6), 2007,
pp 1542-1556.
Brooke, Russell, and Price (1988), Further Evidence for the Discriminant Validity of
Measures of Organizational Commitment, Job Involvement, and Job Satisfaction;
Journal of Applied Psychology 1991, Vol. 76, No. 1, pp 127-133
Hermsen, Jill Rosser, Vicki (2008),Examining Work Engagement and Job Satisfaction of
Staff Members in Higher Education; CUPA-HR Journal Fall/Winter2008, Vol. 59 (2), pp
10-18, 2 Charts
Kelleher B. (2011), Employee Engagement and Retention; American Management
Association
Koscec M. (2003), Leadership Intelligence Inc with permission by Entec Corporation.
Lakshmi, M.S., Srinivas, K. & Krishna, K.V.R. (2010) Employee Engagement For Talent
Retention With Reference To The Academicians, Review Of Business Research, 10(3),
pp.137-140
Macey, W.H. & Schneider, B. (2008), The meaning of employee management, Industrial
and organizational psychology, 1, pp 3-30
8/3/2019 Report Dissertation- Nikita
28/28
28
Rich and Louis B. (2006), Job engagement: construct validation and relationships with
job satisfaction, job involvement and intrinsic motivation; UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA,
2006, 197 pages; 3228825
Richman (2008), The relationship of perceived flexibility, supportive work-life policies,
and use of formal flexible arrangements and occasional flexibility to employee
engagement and expected retention; Community, Work and Family, 11(2), May 2008,
pp.183-197.
Solomon Markos, M. Sandhya Sridevi (2010), Employee Engagement: The Key to
Improving Performance; International Journal of Business and Management Vol. 5, No.
12; December 2010
Sterling M. (2011), Want to Enhance Employee Engagement? Ask Three Critical
Questions;American Management Association
Thiagarajan B. & Renugadevi V. (2011), Employee Engagement Practices In Indian BPO
Industries- An Empirical Investigation; Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary
Research in Business Vol. 2, No 10
Wefald, Andrew J.Downey, Ronald G.
(2009), Job engagement in organizations: Fad,
fashion, or folderol;Journal of Organizational Behavior; Jan2009, Vol. 30 I(1), pp 141-
145