Rencontre REPTIC, 26-avril 2017

(Shameless plug)

http://www.saltise.ca

*MOOC Massive Open Online Course

Component Meaning DefaultWeight

Task grade % of tasks completed (completed reviews, back-evaluations, etc.) 20%

Document gradeWeighted average of the grades assigned by the reviewers. Can be curved (fixed mean and standard deviation) or benchmarked*. 40%

Reviewing gradeConsistency with other graders, helpfulness of review comments (back-evaluation) 40%

• Penalties for late submission• Possible bonus for doing extra reviews• Teacher can override any dimension of any grade• Teacher can act as one of the reviewers• Teacher can adjust weighting of the grade components

* benchmarking: teacher grades top 5 and bottom 5 submissions to define document grade scale.

Dimension Rating

Data Quality• Part 1: Simple harmonic motion• Part 2: Simple pendulum

Graph details• Required elements (labels, trendlines, etc.)• Format follows style guide

Conclusions drawn from data (role of experiment)

• Are the data being used to evaluate the applicability of the hypothesis? (good)

• Are the data being used to evaluate their performance of the experiment? (bad)

Each dimension has room for one or more student commentsEach rating is a 7-point scale, with (short) explanations.

Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning. Educational assessment, 11(1), 1-31.

Adapted from Peerceptiv’s “Writing Effective Rubrics”

Adapted from Peerceptiv’s “Writing Effective Rubrics”

Bloom’s Taxonomy (revised)

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2001).

A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives: Allyn & Bacon.

Answer: In science, the theory is what’s being tested by the experiment. This (very common) response reverses that relationship.

•What exactly is science/social science/(insert your discipline here)

•Scientific community, Psychology community, etc.

Submit

Assess

Receive Feedback

Back-evaluate

Edit

Submit final draftto teacher

Grade:1/3 Peer-assessment rough draft (Peerceptiv)2/3 Teacher-evaluated final draft

Peerceptiv

Simulates Peer Review