RASLRES Energy in Wood Seminar · 2011-11-16 · Schools built in 1980's Schools built in 1990's...

Post on 02-Aug-2020

1 views 0 download

Transcript of RASLRES Energy in Wood Seminar · 2011-11-16 · Schools built in 1980's Schools built in 1990's...

John Dolan. Chartered Engineer

BEng (Hons) M.Sc. Fire Eng

H.Dip CEng MIEI

Planning & Building Unit

Tullamore

www.energyineducation.ie.

RASLRES Energy in Wood Seminar

planning and building unit

• based in Tullamore

• sub units – property management & site

acquisitions, schools capital appraisals,

construction & developing areas , forward

planning and professional & technical

• headed by Seán O Foghlu, Assistant Sec Gen

• 141 staff – 9 managers, 105 admin,

27 professional / technical staff

energy in school design

• evolved from energy programme DART

(Design, Awareness, Research & Technology)

• informed by building unit professional &

technical staff & external partnerships

• driven by technical guidance documents

energy in school design

• updated by continued energy research & development

• disseminated by internal / external publications, conferences & annual report

• supported by SEAI and cross border co operation projects

• acknowledged by national &

international energy awards

issues particular to schools

• hours of operation

• schools needs: not same as domestic

market needs

• technical ability on site

• energy is not core function

• solutions must be robust

0

50

100

150

200

250

Schools

built in

1980's

Schools

built in

1990's

Schools,

Best

Practice

Current

school

designs

based on

TGD's

energy usage in new primary schools

Energy used

kWhr/m2/year

• BER requirements are A3 & B1

0

50

100

150

200

250

Schools

built in

1980's

Schools

built in

1990's

Schools,

Best

Practice

Current

school

designs

based on

TGD's

Colaiste

Choilm

energy usage

Energy used

kWhr/m2/year

0

50

100

150

200

250

Schools

built in

1980's

Schools

built in

1990's

Schools,

Best

Practice

CIBSE

Current

school

designs

based on

TGD's

Passive

schools

energy usage in primary schools

with passive approach

Energy used

kWhr/m2/year

biomass research &

demonstration project

• overview of programme

• end users feedback

• fuel supply chain

• initial findings

• conclusions to date

The objectives of the programme

• to test and evaluate biomass systems

• reduce energy in use, produce CO2 saving

• to evaluate the appropriateness & benefits

of combining solar hot water & biomass

• to monitor performance

• to develop a suite of case studies

• to develop a best practice design guide

• evaluate potential for ESCO supply model

• CBS Roscommon

• St Mary’s Boys NS Cavan

• St Brendans NS Birr

• Kentstown N.S. Meath

• Glangelvin N.S. Cavan

• St Peters Community School Cork

• Scoil Mhuire Mullingar

• Scoil Na Naingeal Noafa Boyle

• St Josephs Junior School Dublin

• St Josephs Senior School Ballymun

• Cloghan NS Offaly

• St Cholmcille NS Donegal

• Ballyfin N.S. Laois

• Emo N.S. Laois

the numbers

• 14 sites

• 15 schools

• 17 boilers

• 9 different M&E Consultants

• 8 different manufacturers

• 13 different boiler models

• 13 different contractors

the stats

• 2263 kW boiler power

• carbon reduction pa. ~ 392 tonnes

• grant aided under the renewable heat

deployment programme by SEAI

Convent N.S Boyle County Roscommon

Cloghan N.S County Offaly

Kentstown NS

County Meath

educational value

St. Peter's Community School, Passage West, Co. Cork

biomass St Joseph’s Ballymun

St. Brendan’s Boys P.S. Birr County Offaly

CBS Mullingar County Westmeath

Ballyfin N.S County Laois

biomass research &

demonstration project

• overview of programme

• end users feedback

• fuel supply chain

• initial findings

• conclusions to date

end user feedback

• satisfaction survey with end users

• 10 statements

• score 5 = strongly agreed

• score 1 = strongly disagreed

1 - The Biomass Installation has benefited the school.

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Small Primary

Medium Primary

Large Primary

Second Level

2 – We have seen significant benefit in the running cost of the installation

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Second Level

Large Primary

Medium Primary

Small Primary

3 – The Biomass Plant is Reliable

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Second Level

Large Primary

Medium Primary

Small Primary

4 – The Biomass Plant is easy to maintain

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Second Level

Large Primary

Medium Primary

Small Primary

5 – Any boiler warranty / fault issues are dealt with quickly and efficiently

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Second Level

Large Primary

Medium Primary

Small Primary

6 – The caretaking / allocated staff are correctly trained and able to carry-out day to day checks

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Second Level

Large Primary

Medium Primary

Small Primary

7 – Ash removal and disposal is not an issue

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Second Level

Large Primary

Medium Primary

Small Primary

8 – Fuel supplier can be found easily and reliable

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Second Level

Large Primary

Medium Primary

Small Primary

9 – there is competition in the choice of fuel supplier

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Second Level

Large Primary

Medium Primary

Small Primary

10 – Biomass Integration in schools is a significant benefit and should be rolled out through the country

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Second Level

Large Primary

Medium Primary

Small Primary

Individual average response

0

1

2

3

4

5Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

Second Level

Large Primary

Medium Primary

Small Primary

Overall average response

3.6

3.1

3.0

3.3

2.9

2.8

3.8

3.8

2.9

2.9

0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

The biomass installation has benefited the

school

we have seen significant benefit in the

running cost

the biomass plant is reliable

the biomass plant is easy to maintain

boiler warranty / fault issues are dealt with

quickly

the caretaking staff are correctly trained

and able to carry out day to day checks

ash renoval & disposal is not an issue

fuel supplies can be found easily and

readily

there is competition in the choice of fuel

supplier

biomass integration in schools is of

signifficant benefit and should be rolled out

throughout the country

Strongly

Agree

Strongly

Disagree

biomass research &

demonstration project

• overview of programme

• end users feedback

• fuel supply chain

• initial findings

• conclusions to date

WOOD PELLET

DISTRIBUTORS (50km delivery radius

indicated)

WOOD PELLET

MANUFACTURERS

IN IRELAND (100km delivery radius

indicated)

DUBLIN

BELFAST

KERRYCORK WATERFORD

WEXFORD

WICKLOWLAOISCLARE

KILDAREGALWAY

ROSCOMMON KELLS

LOUTH

DEPOT

DEPOT

DEPOT

DEPOT

DEPOTDEPOT

DEPOT

DEPOT

DEPOT

DEPOT

DEPOT

km0 10050

miles0 6030

TIMBERPRO

MANUFACTURERS

DPELLET,KNOCKTOPHER

BALCAS,ENNISKILLEN

LAOIS SAWMILLS, PORTLAOISE

BALCAS,MALLOW

CLEARPOWER

WOOD PELLET DISTRIBUTORS IN IRELAND

WOOD CHIP

MANUFACTURERS /

DISTRIBUTORS IN

IRELAND

(50km delivery radius

indicated)

WOOD PELLET DISTRIBUTORS IN IRELAND

DUBLIN

BELFAST

DERRY

km0 10050

miles0 6030

IMPERATIVE ENERGY

OTHERS

BAILEY WOODCHIP, BALLACOLLA

RURAL GENERATION

ARDEE

ROSCOMMON

ENNISKILLEN

ECO WOOD LETTERKENNY

GLENMORE

CARRIGALINE

KNOCKNAGASHEL

PORTLAOISE

biomass research &

demonstration project

• overview of programme

• end users feedback

• fuel supply chain

• initial findings

• conclusions to date

initial findings

• mixed feedback on success of applications

• fuel delivery

• fuel storage

• boiler feed systems / manual feed point

• cleaning and ash

• minimise heat loss first

• on site technical capabilities

initial findings

• challenge to integrating with existing dated

systems

• mixed results in energy savings costs

• paybacks

initial findings paybacks second level

Savings Paybacks

€ 3,972.50

€ 4,658.47

€ 2,217.49

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Sa

vin

gs

pe

r a

nn

um

(€

)

23.1

27.8

36.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

Sim

ple

Pa

yb

ac

k (

ye

ars

)

initial findings paybacks large primary

Savings Paybacks

€ 8,423.79

€ 9,149.04

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

Savin

gs p

er

an

nu

m (

€)

18.6

6.5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Sim

ple

Pa

yb

ac

k (

ye

ars

)

initial findings paybacks medium primary

Savings Paybacks

8.8

20.7

6.6

12.5

14.5

0

5

10

15

20

25

Sim

ple

Payb

ack (

years

)

€ 4,927.96

€ 2,597.14

€ 4,148.81

€ 3,334.66

€ 3,575.14

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

4,500

5,000

Sa

vin

gs

pe

r a

nn

um

(€

)

initial findings paybacks small primary

Savings Paybacks

9.7

12.6

11.0

12.7

0

5

10

15

Sim

ple

Pa

yb

ack

(y

ears

)

€ 1,489.85

€ 1,144.39

€ 2,324.76

€ 3,695.57

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

2,500

3,000

3,500

4,000

Sa

vin

gs

pe

r a

nn

um

(€

)

initial findings

• service industry development

• disruption potential to school management

• potential educational value

• reduction in carbon emissions

• boiler combustion sensitivity

• controls strategies

• two may be cheaper than one

biomass research &

demonstration project

• overview of programme

• end users feedback

• fuel supply chain

• initial findings

• conclusions to date

conclusions to date

• study has succeeded in discovering issues and

challenges for successful integration

• fuel supply chain is strong

• some sites inconclusive need further evaluation

• satisfaction ratings - big concern

• consumer confidence

• biomass industry needs to respond nationally

• next steps

www.energyineducation.ie