Post on 13-Dec-2015
Preparing for Data Analysis and Interpreting Data
Preparing for Data Analysis and Interpreting Data
CEI 2015.0 Implementing the Reproductive Health Assessment Toolkit for Conflict-Affected Women
November 5, 2006
ObjectivesObjectives
At end of session, you will be able to:
• List analysis options
• Describe use of Analysis Guide
• Link data to action
Analysis Options Analysis Options
• Send to DRH/CDC
• Run own analysis– Pre-programmed (SAS)– Program of choice
Analysis GuideAnalysis Guide
• Key indicator list– Snapshot of data
• Analysis tables– More detailed information, sub-groups
such as age, ability to read, relationships status
Types of IndicatorsTypes of Indicators
• Knowledge and attitudes
• RH outcomes
• Help-seeking behaviors
• Barriers
Background CharacteristicsBackground Characteristics
• Age groups
• Ethnicity
• Religion
• Education level
• Reading and writing ability
• Displacement status and length
• Relationship status
Safe Motherhood IndicatorsSafe Motherhood Indicators
• Knowledge of pregnancy danger signs
• Currently pregnant
• Antenatal care (ANC)
• Pregnancies in last two years
• Delivery care
• Postpartum care
• Help-seeking behaviors for complications
Key Indicator ListKey Indicator ListIndicator Definition Construction using questionnaire Value Rationale/Data
useRelated tables
SM-e) Receipt of minimum ANC* in last two years
Proportion of women who received minimum antenatal care visits (at least 3) by a trained provider among women whose most recent pregnancy ended in a live birth or stillbirth in the last two years
Numerator:
Q218= 1 (Yes)
Seen anyone for antenatal care
AND
Q219 = 1 (mentioned) for Doctor or nurse/midwife
Trained antenatal care provider
AND
Q220= 3 OR 4 (3 or more times)
Minimum antenatal care visits
Denominator:
Q217A= 1 or 2 or 3 or 4
Women whose most recent pregnancy ended in a live birth or stillbirth in the last two years
This measures whether women who gave birth in the last two years received minimum antenatal visits by a trained provider. At least three visits are recommended, ideally early in the pregnancy. This indicates local antenatal care practices that can put women and infants at risk.
SM-11, 12, 13, 14, 15
70%
*ANC = Antenatal Care
Analysis TablesAnalysis Tables
Table SM-11: Type of antenatal care provider for women during their most recent pregnancy that ended in a live birth or stillbirth in the last two years [country and year] (Q219).* {N= 80}
Characteristic % women (n)
Doctor 30% (25)
Nurse/midwife 50% (40)
Traditional birth attendant/community health worker
30% (24)
Other 5% (4)
*Percentages may add to greater than 100% as respondent may give more than 1 response.
Analysis TablesAnalysis TablesTable SM-13: Demographic characteristics of women receiving antenatal care (ANC) by a trained provider among women whose most recent pregnancy ended in a live birth or
stillbirth in the last two years [country and year] (Q219). {N= 100} Characteristic ANC by a trained
provider and ≥3 visits %(n)
ANC by an untrained provider or no ANC %
(n)
Total (N= 100) 70% (70) 30% (30)
Age (n= 99) Q105
15-24 10% (8) 60% (18)
25-34 20% (13) 20% (5)
35-49 70% (48) 20% (7)
Relationship Status (n= 100) Q406
Married, living together 40% (28) 10% (2)
Married, not living together 30% (21) 10% (4)
Not married, living with partner 10% (7) 60% (18)
Not married, not living with partner
20% (14) 20% (7)
Family Planning IndicatorsFamily Planning Indicators
• Ever heard modern methods
• Ever used modern methods
• Modern contraceptive prevalence
• Barriers to FP
• Unmet need for FP
• Future intent to use a method
Sexual History/STIs IndicatorsSexual History/STIs Indicators
• Condom use at last higher risk sex
• Knowledge of STI symptoms
• STI symptoms in last 12 months
• Help-seeking behaviors for symptoms
HIV/AIDS IndicatorsHIV/AIDS Indicators
• Comprehensive correct knowledge– HIV/AIDS– Mother-to-child-transmission
• Accepting attitudes people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWH/A)
• Perceived risk
• Received HIV test results in last 12 months
• HIV test in the future
Gender-based Violence IndicatorsGender-based Violence Indicators
• Outsider physical/sexual violence during and post conflict
• Reporting outsider violence
• Ever intimate partner violence (IPV)
• IPV in last year
• Reporting IPV
• Family violence
Female Genital Cutting (FGC) IndicatorsFemale Genital Cutting (FGC) Indicators
• Prevalence of FGC– Respondents– Youngest daughter of respondent
• Future intent of FGC
• Favorable to continuation of FGC
Emotional Health IndicatorsEmotional Health Indicators
• Emotional distress – SRQ-20
• Suicidal thoughts in past 4 weeks
Suggestions for Data UseSuggestions for Data Use
Support grant proposals or special requests for money
Develop/modify• programs or services• health systems• policies
Disseminate findings
Improved reproductive
health outcomes
Reliable population
reproductive health data
Support advocacy efforts
Identify and prioritize reproductive health needs
DATA
ACTION
OUTCOME
Data to ActionData to Action
• Disseminate results
• Assemble stakeholders
• Present overview of data
• Prioritize health needs– Size, seriousness, effectiveness of
interventions in "A method for setting priorities among health problems" in APEX-PH, 1991
• Develop action plan
Example: Safe MotherhoodExample: Safe Motherhood
Data to Action
• Ensure quality ANC services available
• Apply for a grant to get resources to staff and supply ANC clinics
• Develop information campaign to promote safe motherhood– Focus among young, unmarried women
DRH Technical AssistanceDRH Technical Assistance
• Run analyses
• Provide analysis programs
• Consult on interpreting data
• Consult on data to action