Photon rate Time End of exposure Ideal Rate of incoming light is constant Reality Rate of incoming...

Post on 18-Dec-2015

215 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Photon rate Time End of exposure Ideal Rate of incoming light is constant Reality Rate of incoming...

Photonrate

Time

End of exposure End of exposure

IdealRate of incoming light is constant

RealityRate of incoming light is fluctuating

Photonrate

Time

How much fluctuation?

√nDictated by Poisson (pwasõ) Distribution

For n total photons in exposure,

standard deviation =

Photons collected = n + √n

If n = 10,000 photons,Photons collected = 10,000 + √10,000 = 10,000 + 100 photons

10,000 photon

s

9,900photon

s

10,100photon

s

9,950photon

s

√n, so what?Variable brightness = noise!

Noise monsterOne of the photographer’s worst enemies

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 9000 100000%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%Proportion of fluctuation

sqrt(n)/n

Pro

port

ion

of P

hoto

n F

luct

uatio

n (√

(n)/

n)

Photons

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 35000%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%

Canon A570ISCanon A570IS

ISO100

ISO200

ISO400

ISO800

ISO1600

Pro

port

ion

of P

hoto

n F

luct

uatio

n (√

(n)/

n)

Photons

Canon A570IS7.1 Megapixels1/2.5” sensor5.76 x 4.29mm (24.7mm2)Density: 3.48 μm2/pixel

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 35000%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Canon 5D

Nikon D300

Sony H9

Pro

port

ion

of P

hoto

n F

luct

uatio

n (√

(n)/

n)

Photons

90 900 90000%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

Canon 5D

Nikon D300

Sony H9

Pro

port

ion

of P

hoto

n F

luct

uatio

n (√

(n)/

n)

Photons

ISO100 ISO200 ISO400

ISO800 ISO1600

Canon A570IS7.1 Megapixels1/2.5” sensor5.74 x 4.3mm (24.7mm2)Area: 3.48 μm2/pixel

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 35000%1%2%3%4%5%6%7%8%

100200

400

800

1600

images: dcresource.com

0 10002000300040005000600070008000-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

ISO100 ISO200 ISO400

ISO800 ISO1600

Fuji F306.1 Megapixels1/1.7” sensor7.7 x 5.77mm (44.4mm2)Area: 7.27 μm2/pixel

100200

400800

1600

images: dcresource.com

0 100002000030000400005000060000-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

ISO100 ISO200 ISO400

ISO800 ISO1600

Canon 30D8.2 MegapixelsAPS-C sensor22.5 x 15mm (337.5mm2)Area: 41.16 μm2/pixel

100200400

8001600

images: dcresource.com

30D

30D

F30

F30

A570IS

A570IS

8.2 Megapixels22.5 x 15mm (337.5mm2)Density: 41.16 μm2/pixel

6.1 Megapixels7.7 x 5.77mm (44.4mm2)Density: 7.27 μm2/pixel

7.1 Megapixels5.76 x 4.29mm (24.7mm2)Density: 3.48 μm2/pixel

ISO100 ISO200 ISO400 ISO800 ISO16000%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

6%

7%

8%Canon A570IS

Fuji F30

Canon 30D

Canon 5D

Pro

port

ion

of P

hoto

n F

luct

uatio

n (√

(n)/

n)

ISO

More photowells mean less photons per pixel

Making matters worse, circuitry must occupy some space between each photowell – the more photowells, the more space circuitry takes up.

SummaryMore pixels, smaller sensor => less light per pixel => more noiseLess pixels, bigger sensor => more light per pixels => less noise

In theory, the biggest sensor with the least pixels will give us the best image, in terms of noise.

A 1-pixel sensor would be ideal.

With 1 pixel, we’d have low noise but no detail.

Many pixels => High detail, high noiseFew pixels => Low detail, low noise

The “Megapixel Myth”: Detail vs. Noise

Megapixels: Detail vs. Noise

Facebook profile picture: 4x6 studio print at 300dpi:

5x7 studio print at 300dpiStandard VGA TV:

1080p HDTV: Projector Screen:

8.5x11in, 300dpi magazine spread:10x14in, 150dpi full-page spread in Daily Cal:

Giant 20x30in poster print at 150dpi:

0.03 MP2.16 MP3.15 MP0.35 MP2.07 MP1.92 MP8.42 MP3.15 MP13.5 MP

How many pixels do we need?:

If you only look at pictures on the computer, 2-3MPIf you make non-poster-size prints (4x6, 5x7, 8x10), 3-4MP

More pixels beyond this don’t add detail, but contribute to greater noise

Caveat: assuming same sensor technology

Chrominance NoiseVariation in color

Luminance NoiseVariation in brightness

Random NoiseFluctuation in light input (random distribution of photons)

Fixed Pattern Noise-Consistently reproducible noise-Caused by electronics, sensor defects, heat-Manifested as “hot pixels” or luminance anomalies-Since noise is reproducible (non-random), easily fixed by dark frame subtraction