Post on 05-Apr-2018
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
1/66
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
2/66
Keir Alexander
B R I T I S H A N T I - M O D E R N I S M
& L O N D O N S S O U T H B A N K
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
3/66
0.1 (previous page): Fountain at the Royal Festival Hall. Photograph by Keir Alexander
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
4/66
CONTENTS
Page 1 Summary
Page 7 1: The South Bank, London: July 2010.
Page 17 2: Historical and Cultural context o the South Bank.
Page 35 3: Anti-Modernism in Britain.
Page 81 4: British National Identity and the Picturesque.Page 113 5: The Hayward & the South Bank Group
Page 143 Conclusion
17,500 words
Appendix I: Transcript o passage rom Muthesius conclusion On The English Character, in
Das Englische Haus.
Appendix II: Extended transcription o letter rom Patrick Heron to Trevor Dannatt in 1992
Appendix III: Interview with Trevor Dannatt & Katherine Heron (o the South Bank Group) atthe Royal Festival Hall, 2010
Page 173 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Page 188 List o Images
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
5/66
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
6/66
This dissertation will investigate the emergence of Anti-Modernist
sentiment in British architectural discourse. It seeks to draw conclusions
on the origins and outcomes of a cultural polemic that continues to rumbleon, in the popular press and in the psyche of the modern British citizen.
Reection on the subject of Anti-Modernism takes place against the
backdrop of Londons South Bank. This is a site that has encompassed
modern architectural aspirations since World War II and the re-construction
of Waterloo Bridge in 1945; from the widely-celebrated Royal Festival Hall
to the much-derided South Bank Centre (SBC).
Anti-Modernism is not a strictly dened idea, nor has it been formalised
into a single writing, book or edice. Rather, it is a widely-held reactionary
belief; a device of discontentment that exists in architectural writings and
in the media. In 1934, Reginald Blomeld, published Modernismus one
of the earliest British texts devoted to the critique of what would come to
be termed The International Style. Since then a series of sensationalist
publications, including The Rape of Britain and Architecture & Morality
have emerged. The notion of national identity ows beneath the surface of
the anti-modernist polemic. The inevitable question emerges, is it possible
for an architecture to be British, or indeed un-British?
The writing of this essay is by no means impartial. It is founded on the
presentiment that the South Bank represents a persuasive example of the
enduring potential and successes of modernism. A collection of buildings,
devoted to the creative arts, that showcases modernism at the heart of the
capital. The South Bank buildings provide a refreshing criterion against
which to judge success or failure; away from the short-handed eyesore
dogma that can be so easily attributed to the great swathes of high-density
post-war housing. The essay focuses on the critical reception of modern
architecture in Britain, rather than the architecture itself. It is concerned
SUMMARY
1
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
7/66
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
8/66
with opinion and theory and on the inuence these have had and continue tohave on our environment.
Research for this text was carried out in a number of ways: Through
extensive reading of published theories and writing, through the appraisal
of journalism in the national press at key moments and through the
examination of archived correspondence. The essay is also based on my
personal experience of the South Bank. It is a story of successes and
failures, that traces Britains tumultuous relationship with the modern
movement. One can view the South Bank as a microcosm for ideas and
opinions for and against; a synecdoche of the polemic.
0.2 (previous page): Fountain at the Royal Festival Hall. Photograph by Keir Alexander0.3: Riverside walk, view rom QEH deck. Photograph by Keir Alexander
3
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
9/66
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
10/66
C H A P T E R O N E
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
11/66
Lighten up a dull place, sweeten a sour spot, and or the frst timebring the south o London a dignifed and beautiul rontage on theRiver Thames 1
Houses have no obligation to be demonstrative; public buildingshave to satisy dierent requirements. Among these, the culturalbuildings o the South Bank are the most prominent post-warcontribution to South London 2
1.0: South Bank Centre, The Mayors Thames Festival 2010. Photograph by Keir Alexander
1 Labour politician, John Burns (1905). Survey of London Monograph 17. County Hall. Hermione Hobhouse,Editor (1991)., The Athlone Press: London p 1102 Cherry, Bridget (1983)., The Buildings of England. London 2: South. London: Penguin Books
6
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
12/66
Of the view southward, Lionel Brett wrote in 1951 On a ne May morning,
the South Bank must be the gayest spot on Earth3. He was reecting on
the launch of the Festival of Britain in the same year, in full view of theSkylon Tower, Dome of Discovery and the Royal Festival Hall (RFH). A
similar approach from the Victoria Embankment 60 years later offers a
new prospect. The proud posture of the newly refurbished RFH remains,
alongside a more recent family.
To the South West, beyond the Hungerford footbridge, the void of Jubilee
Gardens resides as a vacant reminder of the 1951 Festival and to the North-
East a small, but by no means modest collection of rmly modernist cultural
venues. From the distant Victoria embankment, the impression is of a
rolling mass whose edges are undened. The RFH, though boldly upright,
seems to merge into the disordered Hayward Gallery (HG) and Queen
Elizabeth Hall (QEH) complex. Then the mass is split by the crisp edges of
Waterloo Bridge, which umbilically feeds the sharp strata of the National
Theatre (NT). It is a composition of unrivalled swagger and individuality,
yet each a part of the whole.
Then you notice the people. As you cross the white footbridge from
Embankment Station, it bustles with camera wielding foreigners. The
Londoners carry cameras too. The millennial improvements and additions
of the Hungerford footbridge and the giant observation wheel at County
Hall, may give visitors and residents the impression that they are at the
very centre of London. People come here for programmed events, but mostly
they come here to stroll, sit, reect, watch. The South Bank is a destination
in itself. It is the place from which you view the capitals two Cities of
Westminster and London. This is a deliberate phenomenon; since the war, a
long string of urban planners have intended it so.
THE SOUTH BANK, LONDON: JULY 2010
7
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
13/66
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
14/66
In all, the South Bank buildings provide a great number of facilities. TheHayward Gallery, a unique and imposing series of gallery spaces. In
the RFH, QEH, Purcell Room (PR) and NT, at least 6 formal performing
arts venues, each with a different programme. Beyond that there are any
number of incidental or impromptu performance and gallery spaces. On
a clear day the white-blond, sandy-brown and silver-grey of each mass is
clearly distinguishable. A clear evening will bring long shadows to deep
reveals and the sculptural ensemble becomes a warm gold. These days
are rare. On a typical London day, the three are entirely composed of
innumerable greys that mimic the sky overhead.
The recent renovation of the RFH provided a glossy makeover that in
addition to new commercial units (mostly eateries), sprinkled a feeling
of 00s regeneration over the area as a whole. It should be pointed out
that while the innumerable shops give the area a distinctly corporate feel,
they are, in this age, an inevitability and sit respectfully alongside the
complex as a whole. A lively caf terrace awaits visitors directly delivered
from the Hungerford footbridge. From here you are also able to access the
lower levels next to the Thames, at your own pace. There are no cars. It
is invigorating to be in London and to be liberated from trafc. Many of
the shops will sell you designer goods, all adorned with pop-art prints of
the South Banks architecture. The RFH on a plate, the HG on a greeting
card, the NT on an apron. It seems that in 2010, it is okay to like the South
Bank.
A weekly farmers market occupies the newly landscaped Southbank
Centre Square at the rear of the RFH. On the elevated walkways of
the Hayward, you might interrupt a fashion shoot or stumble upon a
resident artist occupying a temporary portacabin. Underneath, the
skateboarders and grafti artists that had been so unwelcome previously,
have their own designated area; dened by a line painted on the ground
and obeyed implicitly. The generous stepping back of the mass of the NT
on the Waterloo Bridge corner invites people in and contains them like a
mini piazza. Denys Lasduns rectilinear terraces had been intended for
performance to ow out, and they do just that. Here, teenagers perform
street acrobatics on John Maines arena sculpture to a guaranteed
audience.
9
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
15/66
1.1 (previous page): Terrace access at the RFH (design by Allies + Morrison. Photograph by Keir Alexander1.2: Royal Festival Hall terrace. Photograph by Keir Alexander
10
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
16/66
It is rare for people to be given such inclusive civic space in the modern city,where commercial impetus will always drive down its existence of it. Rarer
still, for it to be embraced and enjoyed so vividly.
The phrase South Bank has come to signify a number of things. An
(almost) uninterrupted walk from Westminster to the City and Southwark
via Lambeth Marsh. It is also a phrase that has become particularly
synonymous with a style of modern architecture, in a complimentary or a
detrimental manner, for better or worse.
It is possible to observe the area as a series of constructions that trace thecourse of the modern movements relationship with Britain. Each with a
decisive contribution to architectural discourse for each decade between
1940 and 1980, they are:
Waterloo Bridge. Giles Gilbert-Scott. 1945
Royal Festival Hall. LCC led by Leslie Martin. 1951.
HG/QEH/PR. GLC led by Norman Engleback & Hubert Bennett. 1968
National Theatre. Denys Lasdun & Partners. 1976
The South Bank buildings are an example of modernism, that is not
associated with the widespread high-rise housing blocks that have been so
consistently criticised. Society has always placed a great emphasis on public
buildings to encapsulate the ambitions and aspirations of the nation. This
is certainly so in the case of Britain. The construction of Whitehall offers a
pertinent example. Sir Charles Trevelyan (then Secretary of the Treasury)
said in 1856:
this city is the mother of arts and eloquence; she is the mother
of nations; we are peopling two continents it is not right that
when the inhabitants of those countries come to the metropolis,they should see nothing worthy of its ancient renown.4
The demolition and rebuilding of the West side of Whitehall in 1865
provided the government with an opportunity to make exactly that gesture.
The grand vision of Whitehall, is a showcase for foreign visitors; an outward
expression of how we see ourselves and how we would like to be seen.
And so it is with the South Bank, a cultural centre for the arts, which is
a typology that holds the highest status in modern society. Though they
11
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
17/66
1.3: Street acrobatics on John Maines Arena sculpture
12
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
18/66
represent the smallest percentage of our building stock, it is through publicbuildings that we make our grandest gestures.
This is not a system-built housing estate or curtain-walled ofce block, of
the type that make up the usual targets of criticism. It is extraordinary
that such architecture has been adopted on this site. Since its formation
it has come under erce scrutiny. Criticism and praise for the South Bank
buildings have been dealt in generous measure. This is an architecture that
belongs to what has been described as the criminal dynasty of Modernism.
Given pride of place in the heart of the capital and enjoyed and celebrated
by Londoners.
N O T E S
1 Labour politician, John Burns (1905). Survey of London Monograph 17. County Hall. HermioneHobhouse, Editor (1991)., The Athlone Press: London p 110
2 Cherry, Bridget (1983)., The Buildings of England. London 2: South. London: Penguin Books
3 Brett, Lionel (1951)., The South Bank Style. The Observer, May 1951
4 Bold, John & Tanis Hinchcliffe (2009)., Discovering Londons buildings : with twelve walks. London :Frances Lincoln. p118
13
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
19/66
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
20/66
C H A P T E R T W O
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
21/66
London had at last woken up to the act that the low-lying land contained
by the great bend o the South bank o the Thames was cartographically inot socially the centre o the capital. 5
Earth has not anything to show more air:Dull would he be o soul who could pass byA sight so touching in its majesty:This City now doth like a garment wearThe beauty o the morning: silent, bare,Ships, towers, domes, theatres, and temples lieOpen unto the felds, and to the sky,All bright and glittering in the smokeless air.Never did sun more beautiully steepIn his frst splendour valley, rock, or hill;Neer saw I, never elt, a calm so deep!The river glideth at his own sweet will:Dear God! The very houses seem asleep;And all that mighty heart is lying still! 6
2.0: Under Hungerord ootbridge. Photograph by Keir Alexander, 2007
5 Stamp, Gavin (2001)., The South Bank Site. in Festival of Britain. Journal of Twentieth Century Society (TwentiethCentury Architecture: Volume 5). Twentieth Century Society: London pp13-246 Wordsworth, William (1802)., Upon Westminster Bridge
16
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
22/66
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
23/66
2.1: Balloon view o London. Wyllie and Brewer
18
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
24/66
the South Bank were renowned for their cloudy complexion, potent smell
and their strength. Breweries proved to be an enduring symbol of the
area. In the 17th century, dramatist Thomas Dekker described Bankside
as one continuous alehouse 9. Indeed breweries continued to dene the
architecture of the area up to the modern day. The miller said, in Chaucers
Canterbury Tales:
and if the words get muddled in my tale,
just put it down to too much Southwark ale.10
The Southern riverfront of the developing London, can therefore be seen as
a convenient colony to house the unsightly, but no less essential elements of
society and indeed the city. Here they could be kept at a safe distance, so as
not to offend. Wyllie and Brewers aerial balloon view of London 11 in 1884,
depicts the view East from Westminster. The heroic Palace of Westminster
and St Pauls are bathed in glorious, almost celestial sunlight. Lambeth
Marsh however, is overwhelmed by looming darkness and smoke. These
artistic mechanisms were presumably employed to obscure the deprivation
and squalor that lay beneath.
The separation of the South Bank from the main entity of London, gives
rise to a state of autonomy. Perhaps this is why the south side of the river
remains so indisputably different from North. The low-lying riverside
of Lambeth Marsh had remained for a long time in its natural swamp-
like state; a place where trees grew more densely than buildings until
the late 18th century 12 when the sprawl of London began to take hold of
it. Waterloo Station was later opened in 1848, following the haphazard
acquisition of land for the train lines that would slice the area incoherently
apart. Gavin Stamp cites the historical novelist Michael Sadliers imagined
impact of Waterloo Station on the residents of the area:
The ruin of Waterloo Road is now complete. No nice family
could have a home in the immediate neighbourhood of a bigrailway station. Think of the noise and crowds and smuts and
general vexatiousness!13
The discernible trend for the typical London terraced house that had existed
in the area of Lambeth Marsh had given way to a new one. The prevailing
mood was now unmistakably industrial: The warehouse chimneys and Lion
Brewery shot tower soon loomed overhead.
19
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
25/66
2.2: The County Hall, London. From the SBG Correspondance Archive
20
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
26/66
By the early twentieth century, the area of Lambeth Marsh was entirely
made up of a combination of factories, warehouses and ramshackle housing.
A labyrinth of roads and train lines intersected chaotically through the area
delivering people to London; it had become a place you travel through to get
to somewhere.
The construction of County Hall on a South bank on the site immediately
adjacent to Westminster Bridge and facing the Palace of Westminster,
provided a symbolic shift in the centrality of the capital; a seat of power
on the South Bank. The building, designed by Ralph Knott would act
as headquarters for the London County Council (LCC) and later the
Greater London Council (GLC) for the next 60 years or so. The GLC was
abolished by Margaret Thatchers government, no doubt due to its political
opposition rather than the actual opposition of its premises to the Palace of
Westminster.
Upon completion of County Hall in 1933, a new view South emerged.
The collection of obsolescent warehouses and shot towers 14 that lined
the Southern riverside was making way for a new civic architecture.
County Hall aimed to enhance the lives of Londoners, both by inspiring a
Renaissance of the South bank riverside and by providing a public buildingwhose interior and exterior would be of the best, superbly executed in choice
materials.15 This tactic of notionally moving London South was upheld by
the LCC when it commissioned plans to be drawn up for a new London, as it
emerged from the trauma of World War II.
The County of London plan in 1943, set aside the bomb ravaged riverfront
region of Lambeth Marsh, as an area of particular opportunity:
we consider that the South bank is the logical position
for a great and modern expansion of the capital; there is
a latent demand for important frontages on the river with
sites providing for buildings of a national and governmental
character16
This plan reects the psychology of a country emerging from war. It was
ambitiously futuristic and aimed to rehabilitate London, which would then
lead the way for the rest of the country. The reversal of the destruction
of the Luftwaffe would present an opportunity to re-shape London for the
better. A year later, the updated and extended Greater London Plan 17
21
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
27/66
2.3: Social & Functional Analysis, Greater London Plan 1944
22
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
28/66
was published by Patrick Abercrombie. The masterplan for the South Bank
had by now swelled into a chapter of its own which designated the region for
commercial ofces and large cultural venues.
Following the war, (on the centenary of the Great Exhibition of 1851) a
Festival of Britain was planned to kick start development and provide a
tonic for the nation. These were times of signicant nancial hardship,
yet it was deemed essential to keep morale high and aspirations progressive.
Houses were cleared, huge holes were dug and futurist icons constructed.
The Festival was an optimistic gesture and provided a public platform for
many talented young architects to test their modern ideas on a massive
scale. In the following year, the artist Frank Auerbach began to follow
and document the progress of Londons building sites. Fascinated by the
drama and rawness of the reconstruction, the speed of morphology that was
taking place in his city, Auerbachs depictions of Londons construction sites18 are physically rich, with paint applied so thickly, they might be works of
sculpture.
The location of the Festival on the South Bank was an important gesture
for the future of London. It could certainly be seen as a similar gesture
to the southern siting of County Hall, as an attempt to bring the focus of
London across the river. The extent to which the project would ultimatelyre-centre the capital is up for debate. When the Festival site was eventually
cleared of the temporary exhibitions, only the Festival Hall was left behind.
This clearing of the surrounding areas prompted the series of plans for
future developments, that some years later would include the South Bank
Centre and the National Theatre.
These new constructions were intended to provide signicant new
frontages, creating a band of rmly orientated developments to address
the water front. This aspiration to create a handsome spectacle from the
North may be seen to come at the expense of that from the South. At therear of the South Bank buildings run a series of what are fundamentally
service roads. At this point, the rest of South London awaits, though the
pedestrians natural inclination to venture forth is very limited. The South
Bank is essentially a viewing gallery to the North, a reafrmation of the
still unresolved North / South divide. This brings into question where the
boundary between North and South actually lies? Perhaps, it could be said
to exist somewhere over the middle of the Thames; in reality it is more
23
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
29/66
2.4: Summer Building Site, Frank Auerbach 1952
24
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
30/66
likely to lie somewhere along Belvedere Road (one street back from the
river).
This may be in part due to the planning of the Festival of Britain at its very
inception. Gavin Stamps essay the South Bank site raises this signicant
point. The artfully irregular, picturesque plan 19 of the exhibition sat aloof
from Lambeths urban grain beyond. In the positioning of the Festival on
the South side of the river, a grand gesture was being made, but this move
is almost immediately undermined by the avoidance of acknowledgement
of the context beyond. Stamp goes on to describe the large screen of tubular
steel and canvas, which effectively acted as the rear site hoarding. Its
purpose was not necessarily to obscure the view inward, but to cover up the
shabby buildings of Waterloo Station 20. Out of the necessity of promoting
the message of a new start, the festival site from its creation, has existed
within a self-conscious and internalised bubble. The rules that apply to the
planning of the rest of the city, do not apply in the same way here. This
is pertinent when considering the projects that arrived on the South Bank
later.
The Royal Festival Hall is generally considered to mark the arrival of
modernism to the British mainstream, but Waterloo Bridge immediately
adjacent may hold an alternate claim to that title. The rst WaterlooBridge, designed by Sir John Rennie to mark the second anniversary of the
battle of Waterloo, had been widely admired, visited and painted. On a trip
to England in 1815 Antonio Canova, the Venetian sculptor is said to have
described it as the noblest bridge in the world 21. When the settlements
at pier 5 of the bridge failed in 1923, the bridge was closed and plans for
a replacement drawn up. Built in 1939-45, Giles Gilbert-Scotts aim had
been to build a gothic bridge that was stripped of gothic detail. This
combined with the team of engineers desire for one enormous span, created
a dramatic tribute to modern engineering and design at the heart of the
capital. This is a construction of modernist sentiment. In 1967 Ian Nairnwrote:
in its bridge-ness it must outdo even Rennie. The rhythm of
the ve arches is like a coiled spring, catapulting you from
one bank to the other. Physically, it is supported by piers;
spiritually the bridge hardly seems to notice them To see it
next to the Festival Hall and the Shell building is a revelation
of the difference that justied self condence can make.22
25
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
31/66
2.5: Foyer at the Queen Elizabeth Hall 19682.6 (overlea): National Theatre, ater the freworks 2010. Photograph by Keir Alexander
26
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
32/66
When viewed against the RFH, HG and NT, Waterloo Bridge can almost
be seen as the conduit through which aspiration was delivered to the South
Bank. The trio of accomplishments that now stand on the South Bank took
25 years to compile. The RFH, a radical piece of architecture when it was
built now looks rather regal against its neighbours, with its nautical quips.
The 1960s saw the arrival of the Hayward complex next door, a rolling mass
of concrete; unrestrained by symmetry or propriety. In 1976 Denys Lasdun
made the nal contribution to the ensemble with the National Theatre,
surely the seminal work of his career. The project was well received in the
architectural press. Such was the perceived signicance of the project at the
time, that the Architectural Review devoted its entire January issue to the
NT23. Mark Girouard reported that the previous (and only other) project to
claim that accolade, had been the RFH 25 years earlier24. This enthusiastic
reception was not necessarily shared elsewhere, the popular press bestowing
only muted praise when the theatre was nally unveiled.
In the decades that followed, the HG and the NT would become the
focus of escalating dislike. In his book Mediating Modernism25, Andrew
Higgott wrote that the completion of the NT coincided with distinct dip in
popularity. A change in architectural trends was also occurring, High-Tech
was beginning to cause a stir. The Centre Pompidou had been completed in
the same year and it does indeed seem odd that these two contrasting, but
no less outstanding projects could belong to the same era:
Lasdun thus produced a building which participated in
several discourses in British architecture, but the timing was
inauspicious. The year of its completion was close to the lowest
ebb of appreciation of the architectural qualities it had. If
(hypothetically) the Barbican and National Theatre had been
completed a decade earlier, not only their immediate, but also
their lasting reputation would surely have been higher.26
Intriguingly, in his essay Past and PrejudiceforARs special issue, William
Curtis appears to pre-empt this turn in popularity by saying:
It will probably be years before a clear historical view of the
NT becomes possible. 27
Certainly a bad start does not mean that a project will never be a success
or be admired, but it must surely inhibit this process. Perhaps almost 35
years on, with a clearer historical view, we can begin to fully acknowledge
the quality of the building. The National Theatre encouraged a sense civic
27
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
33/66
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
34/66
space of the South Bank, but brought with it a new caf culture. It further
encouraged people to use the South Bank as a public amenity, rather than
just a place to attend specic events. This inclusive architecture, where it
becomes enough to just be, observe and enjoy was a novelty for London:
The huge foyer, which with its tables and its Folies Bergeres
Manet bars, with its people of all ages and classes walking up
and down, listening to music, talking, creates an ambience of
social enjoyment that the French nd it easy enough to evoke
with their cafe tables spreading over the Paris pavements, but
which has hitherto been unknown in London.28
Individually, each of the three buildings have exhibited a diverse range of
design philosophies through their realisation. As a group, their consistent
use of in-situ concrete in varying application and nish has unsurprisingly
led to a widely held notion that they conform, or in fact have dened
their own style, the South Bank Style. This is not an unfair label, but it
does overlook the fact that they have all been conceived and executed in
extremely different ways. If you remove the notion of material, these are
very different buildings.
Labels help to understand and categorise, but they are also reductionist and
all too easily divisive when used to criticise. Labelling the National Theatre
a concrete gulag 29 is a gesture loaded with moral overtones which are
sensationalist in the extreme. As Alan Powers wrote in the introduction to
his comprehensive study, Britain Modern Architectures in History:
The lack of widespread acceptance of Modernism in Britain
since its inception cannot simply be ignored or dismissed as the
stupidity of the unenlightened30
Instead it should be dissected and analysed until understood. The
movement of Modernism is now viewed as an historical matter: a brief
moment in the past. Charles Jencks famously claimed in his book The
Language of the Post Modern Architecture, that Modernism had been
pronounced dead in 1972 31. That may well be that case, but the enormous
effect it had on our environment is incalculable and the ideas it passed on,
innumerable. Signicantly, a chasm now exists between contemporary
architectural endeavours and popular taste and approval, which seems still
to be unresolved. The current status quo on style is one of plurality which
is healthy, but there is also a prevailing trend of polite mediocrity, which is
not.
29
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
35/66
N O T E S
5 Stamp, Gavin (2001)., The South Bank Site. in Festival of Britain. Journal of Twentieth Century
Society (Twentieth Century Architecture: Volume 5). Twentieth Century Society: London pp13-24
6 Wordsworth, William (1802)., Upon Westminster Bridge
7 Hobhouse, Hermione Editorial (1991)., Survey of London Monograph 17. County Hall. The AthlonePress: London pp17-18
8 Reilly, Leonard & Geo Marshall (2001)., The Story of Bankside. From the River Thames to StGeorges Circus. London Borough o Southwark, 2001. Neighbourhood History No. 7
9 ibid
10 Chaucer, Georey (1380-1392)., Canterbury Tales and other poems. The Millers Tale. Edited byD. Laing Purves
11 W. L. Wylie and H. W. Brewer (1884). View of London looking east from the Palace of Westminster(LMA Guildhall main print collection q897343x)
12 Reilly, Leonard & Geo Marshall (2001)., The Story of Bankside. From the River Thames to StGeorges Circus. London Borough o Southwark, 2001. Neighbourhood History No. 7
13 Stamp, Gavin (2001) quoting Michael Sadlier (1947) Forlorn Sunset. From The South Bank Site.in Festival of Britain. Journal of Twentieth Century Society(Twentieth Century Architecture: Volume 5).Twentieth Century Society: London pp13-24
14 Hobhouse, Hermione Editorial (1991)., Survey of London Monograph 17. County Hall. TheAthlone Press: London pp17-18
15 ibid
16 Forshaw & Abercrombie (1943)., County of London Plan, prepared or the London County Council.Macmillian and co. limited, London. p.67
17 Abercrombie, Partrick (1944)., Greater London Plan. His Majestys Stationery Ofce, London
18 Wright, Barnaby (2010)., Frank Auerbach: The London Building Sites 1952-1962. London: PaulHolberton Publishing. P.74
19 Stamp, Gavin (2001)., The South Bank Site. In Festival of Britain. Journal of Twentieth CenturySociety(Twentieth Century Architecture: Volume 5). Twentieth Century Society: London p14
20 Ibid
21 Hibbert, Christopher, Ben Weinreb, Julian Keay & John Keay (2008)., The London Encyclopaedia,
30
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
36/66
Third Edition. London: Macmillan. p.991
22 Nairn, Ian (1964)., Modern Buildings in London. London Transport, London pp17-22
23 Architectural Review. National Theatre special edition. No959, January 1977
24 Girouard, Mark (1977)., Cosmic Connections. Architectural Review. No959, January 1977. p5
25 Higgott, Andrew (2006)., Mediating Modernism. Architectural cultures in Britain. London: Routledge.p15
26 ibid
27 Curtis, William (1977)., Past and Prejudice. Architectural Review. National Theatre specialedition. No959, January 1977. p8
28 Curtis, William J.R. (1994)., Denys Lasdun. Architecture, City, Landscape. Phaidon Press Limited:London. p154
29 Charles, The Prince o Wales (1989)., A Vision of Britain. A Personal View on Architecture.Doubleday: London
30 Powers, Alan (2007)., Britain. Modern Architectures in History. London: Reaktion Books. P7
31 Jencks, Charles (1977)., The Language of Post-Modern Architecture. Rizzoli: New York
31
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
37/66
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
38/66
C H A P T E R T H R E E
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
39/66
Ere slabs are too tall and we cockneys too ew,Let us keep what is let o the London we knew 32
This royal throne o kings, this scepterd isle,This earth o majesty, this seat o Mars,This other Eden, demi-paradise,This ortress built by Nature or herselAgainst inection and the hand o war,
This happy breed o men, this little world,This precious stone set in the silver sea,Which serves it in the ofce o a wall,Or as a moat deensive to a house,Against the envy o less happier lands;This blessed plot, this earth, this realm, this England 33
The past has to be the greatest inspiration to any artist. But it is there to
teach you the essence o tradition not to be copied. 34
32 John Betjeman (1974)., rom Meditation on a Constable Picture. A Nip in the Air. John Murray33 Shakespeare, William (1595)., Richard II, Act 2, Scene 134 Denys Lasdun (1993)., in Big, bold and unrepentant. Sunday Telegraph. 23.05.1985
3.0: Book stalls, Waterloo Bridge. Photograph by Keir Alexander
34
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
40/66
Having a grasp on the fraught relationship between popular opinion andarchitectural design is as important as it has ever been. Yet in 2010 the
profession and wider industry is still unable to reconcile the two.
Since its arrival in the 1930s and later its high prole outing at the Festival
of Britain, Modernism has faced a moral and political battle for a share
in shaping the environment and commanding the resources necessary to
do so, against a background of reluctance and scepticism35. The Planning
Act of 1947 36 was a permissive piece of legislation directing power
towards planning committees covering wide areas. Accelerated growth
made modernist construction the mainstream preference for planners
and developers in the 60s facing the post-war housing crisis. Planning
committees themselves were required to draw up plans for the land and
were even able to issue compulsory purchase orders to buy land and lease it
to private developers. This pushed the emphasis towards development and
expansion, as ambitions that were in the national interest. The look and
shape of British towns and cities changed dramatically as a result.
The infamous speech made by Prince Charles to the RIBA in 1984 on its
150th anniversary 37, which contained the monstrous carbuncle sound bite,
is often cited as the founding blow of broader anti-modernist feeling. In fact
distaste for the ideas of the White Gods, as Tom Wolfe later described them
in From Bauhaus to Our House 38, can be traced back to before Britains
rst import of modernist architecture.
Many years before, Evelyn Waugh introduced the modern architect to the
nations imagination with his sharply satirised invention of the bespectacled
German architect, Otto Silenius in his 1928 novel Decline and Fall.
ANTI-MODERNISM IN BRITAIN
35
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
41/66
3.1
36
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
42/66
Reputedly inspired by Hugo Hring, Silenius is portrayed as the son of
wealthy German parents, who comes to England insisting on being called
Professor Silenius. His disposition is one of an intolerant alien guest, who
believes his intellect to be far superior to all those around him, including
the publically schooled and steadfastly English main character, Paul
Pennyfeather. Having only completed a bubble-gum factory in Munich,
Silenius is commissioned by the fashionable aristocrat Margot Beste-
Chetwyndes to build something clean and square 39, while she departs for
an imminent world tour. In a section of the book, Silenius in interviewed by
the press:
The problem with architecture as I see it, he told a journalist
who had come to report on the progress of his surprisingcreation of ferro-concrete and aluminium, is the problem
of all art the elimination of the human element from the
consideration of form. The only perfect building must be the
factory, because that is built to house machines, not men. I do
not think it is possible for domestic architecture to be beautiful,
but I am doing my best. All ill comes from man. He said
gloomily man is never beautiful, he is never happy except
when he becomes the channel for the distribution of mechanical
forces.40
This example gives a hint of how modern architects began to be portrayed
in some strands of popular culture. It is interesting that in both Wolfes
and Waughs books, the austere humourless character of the architects
personality is every bit as important to their critique as the appraisal of the
architecture itself; indeed in Waughs case the architecture is written off as
wholly unimportant.
In 1934, Reginald Blomeld, a major contributor of Regent Streets
Quadrant, published Modernismus which described the ideas of modernism
as extreme of crude and unabashed brutality. This is the rst formal
publication devoted solely to the critique of the new movement. Apart fromhis obvious disdain for the international style, Blomeld struck upon a
similar fundamental notion to Waugh: that modernism was bringing with
it foreign values. By pointedly entitling his book, Modernismus, Blomeld
was clearly drawing attention to its Germanic origins and inuence.
Blomeld wrote in his nal chapter The Way Home:
English towns and countryside cannot assimilate this new
architecture. It is essentially Continental in its origin and
37
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
43/66
3.2
38
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
44/66
inspiration, and it claims as a merit that it is cosmopolitan.
As an Englishman [that is] proud of this country I detest and
despise cosmopolitanism.41
This notion of modernism being un-British is a central theme that
continues to arise in anti-modernist writings. Many architectural
publications have followed Modernismus. They contribute to a consistent
and persuasive current that can now be seen as a linear polemical discourse
that continues today. In 1973, Goodbye London. An illustrated Guide to
Londons Threatened Buildings42 was published by Christopher Booker
(who later became architectural advisor to Prince Charles) and Candida
Lycett-Green (John Betjemans daughter). Booker is a perennial contrarian
with a penchant for controversial views. As well as having expertise inarchitecture, since 1990 his column for the Sunday Telegraph has claimed
climate change to be unproven, evolutionary theory awed and asbestos
to be un-harmful. Goodbye Londons nal chapter names and shames
developers (including their nancial assets) and developers architects,
placed simply under the sub-heading Architects. Booker was also one of
the founding members of the satirical fortnightly magazine,Private Eye.
European Architectural Heritage Year, 1975 saw the foundation of SAVE
(Britains Heritage). In Naturally BiasedKester Rattenbury extensively
analysed the role of the British media. She reported that SAVE had been
founded in the wake of the demolition of Euston Arch and had an extensive
reach of inuence:
The editor of Country Life, the architectural correspondant of
the Daily Telegraph and the Financial Times, the anonymous
Piloti in Private Eye (the satirical magazine that was a
major source of gossip for all other journalists) were all
leading members of SAVE, as were other leading architectural
writers.43
1975 also marked the publication of the shockingly titled, Rape of Britain
by Colin Amery and Dan Cruickshank. Presumably the title Goodbye
London had not been sensational enough. Sir John Betjeman in the early
70s was the regular architectural columnist forPrivate Eye, under the title
Nooks and Corners of the New Barbarism. Betjeman, a famously erce
opponent of modernism and long campaigner for the protection of Victorian
architecture provided a foreword to Amery and Cruickshanks book:
39
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
45/66
3.3
40
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
46/66
As I look through this book I think that it is not only the
developer that is to blame for the rape of Britain but also theyes-man who wants to be on good terms with his committee,
the architect who is his own public relations ofcer.44
The title of the book is very clever and profoundly affecting. Adopting the
word rape in the same utterance as Britain is a device that appeals to
any scrap of nationalism that may reside within even the most un-patriotic
citizen. The book is itself a photographic survey of 30 or so British towns
and their re-building following the war. Most of the choices are typically
picturesque, including Bath. Chapters consist of pre-war vistas destroyed
by new monolithic constructions.
The nineteenth century changed the form of many towns,
but to our eyes now the work of the Victorians is innitely
more in keeping with the city than anything built in our own
time. The destruction during the nineteenth century pales into
insignicance alongside the licensed vandalism of the years
1950-75...Victorian improvers were amateurs alongside
todays professionally aided merchants of greed. Accountancy
and devotion to prot are the two spurs of redevelopment.45
The impact of the book is very effective and rightly so; many of the hard-
hitting before and after photographs are extremely alarming. Antiquated
scenes are fondly photographed, their unabashed modern destroyers stand
baldly, often amid the chaos of cranes and rubble. The rapid and sweeping
re-shaping of Britains towns at this time is without question, dramatic and
often lamentable. The conclusion of the book holds architects and indeed the
modern movement itself responsible for this change:
The grisly results of their trade are there, in almost all our
towns, lasting memorials to an age of little taste and less
sensitivity. Since the early 1950s architects trained in the
disciplines and dogmas of an alien Modern Movement haveimposed an architecture that simply does not t. The public
has realised for a long time that there is something wrong
with modern architecture. It is more difcult for a trained
professional to re-think his old doctrines and admit that he
has littered our cities with far too many shoddy and irrational
structures.46
The book states early on that it was produced and published with great
haste and urgency, so that public action could be taken against future
41
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
47/66
3.4
42
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
48/66
developments as soon as possible. Warranted as the theme of the book may
have been; Cruikshank, Amery and Betjeman were also seeking someone
to blame. The nger is pointed squarely at the architect, moreover the
modernist architect.
At this juncture, the perceived distinction between destruction and
development becomes ambiguous. While difcult to generate quantitative
evidence, if would not be an exaggeration to state that in the present day,
much of the British public now hold the architectural profession itself,
responsible for the state of the modern British city. This is not unjustied,
architects are in part to blame, but their existence depends on the ow of
money from developers. The legacy ofRape of Britain, while widening
awareness of over-development, must also have been to irrevocably tarnish
the name of the architect. It was modernism not mediocre design being
blamed, yet it was bad design and not modernism itself that was to blame.
It is an association that the architect is still unable to shake off. This is an
indictment of the wider architectural professions disinclination to stand up
for themselves. Why is the profession as a whole so willing to accept this
criticism based on the malpractice of a small number?
The outrage often expressed by Betjeman at the destruction of what he
deemed to be heritage building stock has a somewhat ironic resonance todaywhen so many of the modernist eyesores that he so loathed, are now irting
with demolition or heritage. In the 1960s much of the Victorian architecture
was often deemed to be of a very poor standard and was widely endangered.
Only through extensive campaigning was much of it saved, an achievement
which many people must now be very grateful for. Victorian, may have
been a term of derision in the mid-20th century, it is surely now seen as an
asset.
Betjeman had a well-documented rivalry with Nikolaus Pevsner, whom he
is said to have referred to only as The Herr Professor-Doktor47. This maywell have been out of contempt for his prolic and successful Buildings
of Englandbook series, his academic credentials and for his musings on
Englishness. Cambridge historian and former student of Pevsner, David
Watkin has published a number of books on architecture. Though the
principal subject of these books is classicism, a common theme of anti-
modernism runs through his texts. In 1977, his most notorious book,
Morality and Architecturedeclared open war on the modernist movement 48
43
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
49/66
3.5: Introduction pages rom Rape o Britain
44
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
50/66
and can now be seen as perhaps the most decisive and controversial of anti-
modernist texts.
Deliberate bias can be useful to all commentators, but Watkins diatribe
makes no attempt to recognise any of the successes of modernism. The
picture it paints is enormously reductive of the movement as a whole. Le
Corbusier, Gropius and Wagner are his main targets, but a large section
of the book is dedicated to the discrediting of Pevsners historical methods.
Watkins will to present modernism as the enemy is absolute and his
critique totally rigid. He attacks modernism for being a monolithic culture
of indoctrination, without acknowledging that the modern practice of 1977
had evolved its thinking far beyond the almost puritanical musings of Adolf
Loos in 1908, almost 70 years earlier.
It could be said that the modernist experiment being attacked here
had been for some time extinct. Loos, Gropius and Le Corbusier may
have been the departure point for a set of ideas, but what has happened
since then represents a rapidly evolving animal. For example, to attack
deconstructivism in 2010 shows a lack of hindsight; it was already dead
ten years ago. Anti-modernist discourse urges you in with complete reason;
they want buildings that respond to human scale and interaction yes,
buildings responding to their context yes, buildings that celebrate localcraft and industry yes please. But you would be hard pressed to nd
modern architects that dont share these feelings; who wouldnt agree?
Both parties reduce the values of the other as a point of habit, wishing each
other so much to become the very caricatures that they had constructed
in their writings. Around 20 years later, Watkin published Morality and
Architecture Revisited, Watkin reassesses the inuence of his earlier book,
keen to divulge the support he received from wide-ranging and un-expected
sources, as though the weight of his argument is resoundingly proven. One
example is the rather surprising endorsement of the earlier book fromDenys Lasdun:
At the same time I received support from some modern
architects, including Sir Denys Lasdun, who wrote in the
course if his letter: I much enjoyed Morality and Architecture
and subscribe to its central theme 49
One imagines there to have been some sort of caveat to this remark, that
is not included. Watkins own taste in architecture is conned to the
45
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
51/66
3.6: Louis Hellman, The Bandwagon Rolls... 1985
46
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
52/66
historical, but furthermore the English. In his study on the history of
English Architecture 50, the modern movement is granted only a few pages
in the nal chapter, as if only at the publishers request. He is quick to
point out in this nal chapter, the nationality of modernism. His former
teacher Nikolaus Pevsners name is seldom included without the prex
German migr; or modernism itself, without qualifying it as a continental
fashion imported from Germany and France51. To imagine that modernism
is an unworthy endeavour because it is foreign in origin is xenophobic.
Where does he suppose the Baroque or Palladianism came from?
The title of Watkins book pays homage to a fundamental problem with
the dispute. As Loos had also done through Ornament and Crime, to
inextricably link the polemic with morality. This is a move that escalated
the discussion to such irrationally emotive 52 levels, that it is virtually
impossible to compose a calm reection upon it. This is a common problem
in our understanding and description of architecture. In the absence of a
suitable language with which to describe our understanding, we instead
attribute anthropomorphic or moral qualities to it. We refer to Norman
Fosters Swiss Re tower as the Gherkin because it is has universal
appeal to both the architecturally literate and illiterate. Anti-modernist
commentators regularly deploy words like eyesore, slab, bunker and ugly
because they also appeal to the everyday imagination.
In the 1980s a small, but distinct and inuential clique began to emerge.
Prince Charless personal opinions and thoughts on architecture, while not
founded on any professional or academic basis began to give air to a general
feeling of so-called disenchantment among the general public towards
modern architecture. Architects Quinlan Terry, Robert Adam and Leon
Krier, are among the closest collaborators of the Prince. Charless interest
in architecture, which had been hobbyist, was gaining in momentum and
would become his principal concern. By the time of his controversial 1984
speech, the industry felt that it had to take notice.
Presumably bolstered by his burgeoning popularity, the prince began
to throw his weight into disrupting a series of high-prole construction
projects. Peter Ahrends National Gallery extension and Arups Paternoster
Square were among the high-prole casualties. At this time architectural
journals joked that there wasnt an architect in the land that hadnt
acted as advisor to the Prince. A well-known Hellman cartoon, depicts an
overcrowded bandwagon, begin driven by the Prince. Among these was
47
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
53/66
3.7
48
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
54/66
the post-modernist Terry Farrell, an architect approaching his commercial
peak at that time and who would go on to work extensively on new designs
for the drastic remodelling of the South Bank. In 1989 Prince Charles
presented a television series entitled Vision of Britainwith Christopher
Booker (author ofGoodbye London) which featured among other things,
the two men reviewing the waterfront architecture of the Thames from a
boat. This television show was later turned into a book under the same
title, a publication that might be better described as a picture book. This
is perhaps the birth of Charless famously slanderous similes on modern
architecture. Critical gobbets are cast from the boat: Do humans actually
work there? directed at the now demolished Mondial House and it looks
like a concrete gulag of the National Theatre53. Anti-Modernists such as
Charles, Watkin and Betjeman are particularly adept at composing these
verbal assaults. Charles has defended this preoccupation:
I have never been rude about any architect. I try to produce
similes which conjure up images and make more of a point
than descending into personal abuse.54
He may defend these musings for not being personally derogatory, but
many architects would no-doubt have preferred a personal jibe instead.
A reputation began to precede the Prince from then on. A little later, the
Prince was invited to speak at the AIA annual Gala. John Taylor, for New
York Magazine wrote:
would the Prince unload one of his now-legendary broadsides?
Which American architects would he now attack? An utter
stillness settled over the immense hall.55
The same article reports that 87% of the British public agree with his beliefs
though it doesnt expand on where this statistic had been obtained. This
is a typical tactic, using pseudo sociological ndings to substantiate the
validity of an argument. The verbal blows to the American architecturalestablishment that had been expected, never came. It is possible that in
the wake of such controversy, the Prince had decided to focus his energies
in other ways. He soon went about putting the ideas ofVision of Britain
into practice, through the endorsement of neo-classical architects such as
Quinlan Terry and John Simpson. These architects are kept close at hand
to deliver alternate visions, often commissioned by the Prince for sites of
particular signicance.
49
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
55/66
3.7: John Simpson scheme or Paternoster Square 1989
50
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
56/66
In 1987, a Richard Rogers design had been considered the front-runner
in an invited bid for the development of the Paternoster Square site,
immediately adjacent to the nationally symbolic St. Pauls Cathedral.
Despite subsequent collaboration with Arup, the design had come under
mounting pressure in the press and Arup proceeded alone. When a new
Arup/Hopkins/MJP scheme was exhibited to the public in 1988, it did so
alongside an alternative vision. A neo-classical proposal from architect
John Simpson, funded by the Evening Standard provided the nal nail
in the cofn for the contemporary aspiration. Prince Charles put his full
weight behind the Simpsons design and eventually a team led by Terry
Farrell as masterplanner and perennial favourites; Quinlan Terry and
Robert Adam were awarded the job. Their nal design was later granted
planning approval in 1993 56, but the site came under new ownership and
was subsequently developed according to a post-modern William Whiteld
design. Rogers later said of the design:
What was needed was a scheme with real integrity not a
dogmatic piece of modernism or an eclectic pastiche.57
In 2009, a similar plot was played out when Prince Charles complained to
the Qatari royal family over Rogers plans with developer Qatari Diar for
the high-prole Chelsea Barracks site. The prince had written in a letter
the previous year:
I can only urge you to reconsider the plans for the
Chelsea site before it is too late. Many would be eternally
[underlined] grateful to Your Excellency if Qatari Diar Real
Estate Investment could bequeath a unique and enduring
[underlined] legacy to London.58
Again Charles was ready with an alternative proposal, which was put
forward in the form of a Quinlan Terry napkin sketch in 2009. After a
great deal of bad press, Qatari Diar dropped the Rogers scheme (at that
stage some months into its planning application) and went back to the
drawing board.
Leon Krier is perhaps Prince Charles most notable collaborator. A former
employee of Jim Stirling, Krier remains a long serving advisor to the Prince.
Together they masterplanned and built Poundbury near Dorchester, the
most well-known example of the historicist trend encouraged by the Prince
in the 1980s. Poundbury is signicant for its collaged adoption of historical
51
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
57/66
3.8: Poundbury, Dorchester
52
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
58/66
motifs, but also for being the only major New Town to have been embarked
upon since those of the 1960s, which included Milton Keynes. Poundbury
was intended to present an alternative British vision for modern settlement
and construction. Modern perhaps only in age, Owen Hatherley reports
that ruin value59 is endorsed during construction of buildings which are
articially aged as if they were elements in a stage set or a pair of stone-
wash jeans.
Krier has a well-established public persona. He has taught at a range of
architectural schools, including the AA in London. His prodigious drawing
talent has created a great number of well-known and often referenced
satirical cartoons on architecture. His position as key anti-modernist
commentator is keenly legitimised by his training and practical experience
in the modern style. Though Poundbury is one of his only built projects, he
is also an apologist writer on Albert Speer; an architect for whom he has
a great deal of admiration. Speer served as principal architect of national
monuments under Hitler; he also became a minister of the Third Reich.
This royal clique exist symbiotically, each pays regular tribute to the others
talent, each will plug one anothers books, each will offer recommendation.
Upon browsing their various texts and publications, a partisanship is
immediately apparent. This comes in the form of regular dedications,forewords and contribution to each others works. v and Watkin vehemently
criticised the modern movement for its self-perpetuating cliques, yet their
contemporaries operate in very much the same manner. It could be argued
that they themselves have become as much a cult in their actions. It is
surprising where dedications and endorsements appear. Watkin was author
of Quinlan Terrys retrospective Radical Classicism60. Krier and Terry are
regularly paid tribute to in speeches61, Prince Charles unexpectedly appears
in the introduction to a book about the relationship between architecture
and mathematics, by Nikos Salingaros62. Salingaros, a professor of
Mathematics at the University of Texas is credited with the upkeep ofLeon Kriers ofcial website. After further reading it transpires that the
lesser-known Salingaros is another long time detractor of modernism. His
numerous writings include a ranting essay on Louis Kahn that verges on
hysterical 63. He refutes the acclaim given to Louis. I. Kahn and argues
that his notoriety in architectural history is undeserved next to the work of
namesakes Albert Kahn & Ely Jacques Kahn.
This is a tight knit group, not enormous in number, but carrying great clout
53
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
59/66
3.9: La Culture Modern(ist)e Leon Krier 1999
54
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
60/66
in terms of inuence. The great inuence granted to Prince Charles can be
unfathomable. The member of a royal family with highly circumscribed
institutional power, the built environment has been the Princes enduring
hobby for many years and the British public has entertained him. Again
and again, he has exerted his inuence over the architectural day to day of
the country unchecked. The question that arises is, as a country, why do
the British allow him such inuence? Indeed why does the RIBA? In 2009,
25 years after the monstrous carbuncle speech, Charles was invited back to
make another speech to the profession in a sequel to his 1984 polemic.
Following the extensive public sector cuts of the Conservative Lib Dem
government of 2010, the advisory body CABE had its funding pulled. In
the same week The Princes Foundation was quick to offer its services.
Economic conditions will dictate architectural direction; is it possible that
Charles sees new opportunities to exert his substantial inuence once
again in the wake of a nancial crisis deeper than that of the early 1980s?
In recent decades, economic hardship seems to have followed cycles of
historical sentimentality and conservative governance.
The writings of Betjeman, Blomeld, Wolfe & Watkin allude to the notion
of Modernism representing an unwelcome intruder; an illegal and foreign
immigrant requiring deportation. Watkin compares Modernism to theimpact Palladianism had on English Baroque:
As a doctrinaire programme for a new architecture that
would not tolerate the existence of any other kind of building,
the modern movement curiously resembles the imposition by
Lord Burlington of strict Palladianism on the fertile English
Baroque64
The obvious conclusion being, if its imported, we dont want it. The
aesthetics of Palladianism were themselves imported from the villas of
Veneto, where Inigo Jones had travelled in the early 17th century. AlthoughEnglish Palladianism and English Baroque were English in provenance,
neither were ideas that originated in England. Both were hybrids of an
imported aesthetic; that took on new signicance when placed in an English
context or more precisely in an English landscape. Perhaps what the quote
alludes to more simply is a supercilious preference for an aesthetic style. In
other words, that Watkin doesnt like the look of English Palladianism as
much as he likes the look of English Baroque. This distinction, while not
invalid or irrelevant, does render the appraisal supercial. This is a aw in
55
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
61/66
3.10: The Clients First Night in the House Tom Wole, 1980
56
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
62/66
the anti-modernist reasoning, that their objection pertains to a theoretical
opposition to modernism, when in fact it is far more based on an aesthetic
preference. In his contribution to Quinlan Terrys architectural monograph
Radical Classicism, Watkin again writes:
The Modernism, with which Quinlan Terry has had to battle,
is like the Taliban, a puritanical religion, so iconoclastic that
it permits no reference whatever to the forms, materials, or
methods of construction of tradition, classical or vernacular
language, and above all no use of mouldings.65
No use of mouldings indeed? A strange exception to place above all.
Quinlan Terrys Richmond Riverside development, must surely be regarded
as a crowning achievement of the historicist trend that emerged from
growing anti-modernist feeling in the 80s. When it was completed in 1988,
Alan Powers described the project as being greeted by an appreciative
public 66. This was a large-scale development consisting of a large amount
of speculative ofce space and also extensive public landscaping for the
sloping waterside site. On the surface, faades combined styles of Archaic
Greek, Venetian Gothic, Italian Baroque and Regency. Beneath these lay
standard, concrete frame, modern ofce buildings. The pre-occupation with
moulding and surface treatment represents an ethos that places exterior
appearance above interior experience. A damning and often applied critique
of this approach, is to dismiss it altogether as Pastiche. In other words,
that it results in architecture that is wholly derived from the accumulation
of motifs of another time or place; a philosophy that is in fact only skin-deep.
Pastiche is a term that Prince Charles no doubt loathes. He commented in
his 2009 RIBA address:
Indeed, traditional buildings and projects are still looked
down on today by most teachers; too often dismissed out of
hand as pastiche or worse.67
The Richmond Riverside development, though perhaps popular never
prompted a true revival or take-up by main-stream developers. Instead it
stoked an already fulsome trend for post-modernism which was practised by
Robert Venturi, James Stirling and Terry Farrell among many others.
This fetish for aesthetic can be seen to lead to an unexpected allegiance
between historicist anti-modernists and post-modernism. Intended as the
long awaited antidote to the formality and restraint of stern modernism,
57
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
63/66
3.11: Venturis National Gallery Extension
58
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
64/66
the baton of post-modernism is picked up by some anti-modernists because
of its adoption of aesthetic motif and historical reference. The long-running
dispute about style had up until that point been a case of one extreme
versus another; black versus white. The separate camps had existed like
political parties, their very position dened by its opposition to something
else. When post-modernism waded into the argument in the 1980s the
issue became somewhat confused. Anti-modernists in support of post-
modernism overlook the irony that resides at the heart of it.
The championing of Terry Farrell by Prince Charles in Vision of Britainis
testament to this. The book carries ringing support for the new post-modern
style. Another notable endorsement came for Robert Venturis extension to
the National Gallery. The project was praised for its inclusion of classical
detailing, without further praise for the planning of the building itself. The
interior planning of an art gallery is the facet of success that should be
deemed most important. The interior planning of Venturis extension, at
least at entry level should be valued for its staging and sequencing. The
mouldings on the exterior of the building must surely be the single least
interesting feature of the building.
As mentioned earlier, it is often said by anti-modernists that they represent
the overwhelming majority of British people:
traditional architecture is generally popular with the wider
public. This makes it a threat to the architectural mainstream
where, all other battles having been won, the only mission left
is the pursuit of public approbation.68
In 1984 the BBC ran a programme called Our London, in which post-war
buildings of London were rated for popularity by a postal voting poll of over
4,500 entries. In his review of the television show forBuilding Design, Ian
Latham wrote:
Few will be surprised to learn that blocks of housing take six
of the bottom eight places - how often have acquaintances, on
discovering your profession, warned you not to build any tower
blocks69
On this occasion, the public voted the Hillingdon Civic Centre in Uxbridge
by RMJM the best, with Alton West Estate Roehampton (LCC) and Robin
Hood Gardens estate rated the worst. Tower blocks were mostly not built
59
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
65/66
3.12: Britains Largest Cottage. Hillingdon Civic Centre
60
7/31/2019 PART 1 British Anti Modernism Londons South Bank Keir Alexander Diploma Dissertation Lowres
66/66
by architects but by committee. The profession has to be careful about its
association with such things.
Whilst acknowledging that a poll of 4,500 BBC viewers cannot be
representative of an entire nations feelings, the voting of Hillingdon
Civic Centre as most popular is particularly telling. This was essentially
a contemporary concrete framed ofce building with a conventional
programme, crudely draped in an intricate and apparently ornate brickwork
faade. In this respect it is again similar in some ways to the skin-deep
aesthetic of the Richmond Riverside development. In his book, A Broken
Wave Lionel Brett refers to the Hillingdon Civic Centre as Britains largest
cottage 70.
As mentioned earlier, popularity is generally cited as a cornerstone of the
anti-modernist argument. Ballantyne and Law point out in Tudoresque
Vernacular and the Self-Reliant Englishmanthat in the 1920s and 30s,
Tudoresque was the most commonly adopted building style:
for people who did not want to be seen as a pretentious but
who wanted to invest in their own little bit of England71
The xation on exposed Tudoresque beams in many of the countrys
houses may offer proof of a great fascination among the British public for
historicism, even though there is support too for 20th century architecture.
If it is true that the majority of the public dislike this architecture, how is
it that a movement founded upon the best social intentions has come to be
seen in such a derogatory light? In a 1993 interview, Denys Lasdun recalls
the 1960s as being:
a period of when Britain had beliefs and hopes I dont know
why people run it down so.72
Owen Hatherley echoes this sentiment, when describing the historical
context of Shefelds infamous Park Hill estates architecture:
This astonishing structure is a battered remnant of a very
different country, one that briey turned housing for working
people into futuristic monuments rather than shamefaced
61