Panta Rhei Report Brasov, Romania 20th – 22nd October 2009 Secretariat of Panta Rhei.

Post on 17-Dec-2015

224 views 6 download

Tags:

Transcript of Panta Rhei Report Brasov, Romania 20th – 22nd October 2009 Secretariat of Panta Rhei.

Panta Rhei Report

Brasov, Romania

20th – 22nd October 2009

Secretariat of Panta Rhei

SAPS in Romania

1.2 million farmers applying for SAPS.2% of them applies for more than 60% of the

arable land.

Tour de table

Open source products

– a wide variety between MS, from “not at all” to “wide extent”

Payments in advance

- made in Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Hungary, Ireland, Lithuania, Netherlands Romania, Spain and to some extent in Wales

eGovernment in Czech Republic

Presentation about ”Data boxes” -

a communication standard for electronic exchange for national institutions and companies authorised in the company register

This topic about eGovernment will continue next time with presentations from Denmark, Netherlands and Sweden

LPIS Quality work in Sweden

Management and technical aspects of the inventory work of about 1 million parcels

• Office inventory on screen • On- the spot inventory of pasture-land • Test of new technology (laser scanning)

Every block drawn up on the screen costs 5 €

Every block drawn up after a field visit field costs67 €

In addition, 10 € per block for managing, IT-systems, administration

eArchive in Belgium and Netherlands

Common Priorities– Electronic communication with applicants– Single collection and multiple use of data– Customer-driven and efficient working

procedures– Digitalisation of internal working

procedures

eArchive BE and NL

Lessons learned

• For OCR (optical character recognition)– Paper Forms need to be designed for OCR– High quality cannot be achieved instantly

• For “No more paper forms”– big or double computer screens!

• Scan and application side by side– Major change for all in the organisation

• E.g. electronic task list instead of pile of paper• Communication is important!

eArchive BE and NL

Conclusions

• Your strategy depends on circumstances and organizational/political choices (scalability, only e-declarations)

• Online application gives automatic checks and drastic decrease of administrative follow-up

• OCR is a temporary solution towards online applications

• Investments have to be made in staff education and the workplaces

Conclusions from work shops

InteroperabilityDiscussion about legal framework, organization

within MS, technical and IT-security issues

OutsourcingImportant to have milestones to detect deviation

from plans

Internal staff for project management and business analysis

Preference to outsource the technical staff

No paper forms, DK, NL

No paperforms, only an identification code. Paper form only on request.

Very good results, Denmark (from 64 to 87%) Netherlands (from 40 to 70%) e-applications

Necessary to have good support and coaching for how to use the e-service

How and when achive 100% e-applications?

Report from the Commission

ISAMM Status reportISAMM (Information System for Agriculture Market

management and Monitoring)

Service orientation and interoperability are keywords

Will go in production January 2010 for a limited number of forms. The whole system will have 800 different forms

Mandatory e-application is possible – decision for the member state

Thank you for your attention!

Christina HuhtasaariSwedish Board of Agriculture

www.jordbruksverket.sewww.panta.org

E-mail: christina.huhtasaari@jordbruksverket.sePhone: +46 70 346 62 60