Multi stakeholder risk management in small-scaled water resources project

Post on 31-May-2015

123 views 3 download

Tags:

description

application of multi-stakeholder risk management in small-scaled water resources project in Thailand. By asking stakeholders identify, asses and propose risk response, this measure was suggested to be effective for public project risk management.

Transcript of Multi stakeholder risk management in small-scaled water resources project

Multi-stakeholder risk management in small-scaled

water resources project

Piriya URAIWONGKochi University of Technology, Japan

Project • Sai Yu channel conservation and rehabilitation project

Location • Songkhla province, Thailand

Project Characteristic • Channel rehabilitation (dredging and construction of

side way) 5,450 meter• Water storage and water distribution system

2012/9/282

Multi-stakeholder risk management process workshop

2012/9/283

Sai Yu channel after rehabilitation

Cooperate with project owner and local administration leader

Introduce multi-stakeholder risk management process to the local leader

Invite locals and beneficiaries to participate in the workshop

Introduce risk management process to the workshop participants

Conduct multi-stakeholder risk management process

2012/9/284

Workshop Process

• What is risk?• Why we need

to do this?• Risk

management processIntroduction to

risk management

• Risk allocation (project life cycle)

• Risk assessment

• Risk ranking (risk consensus)

Stakeholder risk

assessment • Methods dealing with risks

Risk response plan

2012/9/285

Multi-stakeholder risk management process (in this workshop)

Participants

No. Risk allocation

Cause Impact Opportunity (1-5)

Impact (1-5)

Risk score

Land acquisition

Worry to lost benefit from land

Project cannot construct as designed

1 1 1

1 Water shortage

Storage is from rain harvest only

No agriculture activity

5 5 25

4 High pumping in dry season

No water No agriculture activity

5 2 10

Flooding in rain season

Nature Lost income

1 2 2

2 Water demand increasing

need more income

Unstable income

5 4 202012/9/287

Results

No. Risk allocation

Cause Impact Opportunity (1-5)

Impact (1-5)

Risk score

No rule for water consumption

Individual use

No effect to others

1 1 1

3 Saline intrusion

Pumping water from another channel

Agriculture products lost

5 3 15

Water pollution from factory in the area

Polluted water dumped from factory

Ecosystem degradationEndanger to life/ disease

1 1 1

Digging and selling topsoil

Capitalism

Individual benefit/ income

2 3 62012/9/288

Results 2

Ranking

Risk Response

1 Water shortage Extend water distribution systemCommunication among stakeholders

2 Water demand increasing

Underground waterCrop Zoning Effective water usageEstablish water user group/ water use regulationLow water consumption plants

3 Saline intrusion Chronic problem on downstream (no solution yet)Water gate construction

4 High pumping in dry season

Acceptable 2012/9/289

Results 3

Requirement of willingness to participate motivation!!

Leader has a strong influence Unforeseen risk/ lack of experience Not get use to with the word “risk”/ more

familiar with “problem” or “worry”

2012/9/2810

Highlights

Facilitation skill is important/ trusted person

Risk consensus can be achieved by open and sincere discussion

Local language

2012/9/2811

Highlights

Cover all related stakeholders Larger scale project more stakeholders From plan to implementation? Budget? Hierarchical objectives among stakeholders?

2012/9/2812

Challenges

Lam Dang people and Lam Dang Tambon Administration Office

The department of water resource, Regional office 8 (Songkhla province)

Prof.Tsunemi Watanabe, Kochi University of Technology

2012/9/2813

Acknowledgement

2012/9/2814

Thank you