Post on 31-Dec-2015
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Programming MeetingWater Consultants
5th of March 2008Novotel
1
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Short-commings of first MPs
Missing or insufficient elements: MP Summary Summary for each chapter (Abstract) => key
results No clear separate lists of agglomerations No clear calculation algorithm applied for main
agglomerations following a standard pattern used for data costs base.
No clear CF priority list as a result of options analysis and prioritisation
2
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Short-commings of first MPs
No specific definition of problems No clear maps for representation of the
agglomerations no clear phasing no transparent lists of investments no real options studied no clear, limited number of prioritisation and
selection criteria
3
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
What should be improved?
Overall Summary Summary for each Section (quantify) Summary of specific information (see next
slide) Two separate lists and maps of
agglomerations (water supply and wastewater)
MP strategic options for each county
4
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Specific information and plans summary
5
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
What should be improved?
Criteria for investments Investment phases (templates provided) Contribution to objectives (Accession
Treaty)/model List of actions needed and prioritised
investment (including investment costs => templates)
Unit cost table
6
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Definition of Agglomerations
Draft Methodology prepared by MESD
7
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Approach for Definition of Agglomerations
Implementation Plan Master Plan Feasibility Study
8
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIAA) Definition of agglomerations in
Master Plan
Identification of all agglomerations at county level (maps and data base)
“Clustering” of Agglomerations based on techno-economic assessment
Options Analysis (central/de-central) Discussion with stakeholders Preparation of Long-term investment
plan
9
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
B) in Feasibility Study
Detailed option analysis Preparation of final/detailed maps
and data base on selected agglomerations
10
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIAInterpretation of “Definitions for
UWWTD”Scenario c):
Legal requirements (compliance dates article 3 and 4,5 UWWTD) defined by P.E. of each individual agglomeration
Treatment standard defined by P.E. Of biggest agglomeration. No legal requirement for tertiary treatment if all agglomerations in the “cluster” are below 10.000 P.E. However, other Environmental Directives to be considered (WFD, Bathing Water Directive)
11
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIAInterpretation of “Definitions for
UWWTD”Scenario b):
Splitting one settlement in two parts (i.e. River crossing the town) is not allowed
Development of future population load to be considered
12
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Scenarios “Definitions of UWWTD”
13
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Border Line
Cluster Line
Agglomeration
WWTP Interconnection
“Clustering” of Agglomeration
14
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Boundary of Agglomeration
15
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Definition of Agglomerations
EXAMPLES for AGGLOMERATIONSPrepared by Consultants
16
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
How to define an Agglomeration in practice
Define boarders for all agglomerations in the county (settlements very close to each other might be merged to one agglomeration => consider also future development)
Classification of agglomerations in categories Below 2,000 p.e. 2000 – 1,0000 p.e. Above 10,000 p.e.
17
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Example RomanExample Roman
page 18
Example for Agglomerations – Detailed Definition of Boundaries
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
How to define an Agglomeration in practice
Analyse case-by-case based on the criteria such as: Distance between agglomerations and topography
(altitude) Population/industrial density (p.e./ha) Unit costs for investments (sewer, WWTP, etc.) Specific Investment Costs (in €/p.e.) and specific
Operational Costs (in €/p.e.) => NPV Others (i.e. Recipient water available, land for WWTP
extension, existing capacities, etc.)
19
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
How to define an Agglomeration in practice
Prepare option analysis for all agglomerationsconsidering criteria above) One single WWTP versus separate WWTP Storage tanks for small agglomerations / small
WWTP Etc.
Group individual agglomerations in “clusters” of agglomerations (=> scenario c in Definitions of UWWTD)
20
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
page 21
Agglomerations – Option AnalysisOption 1 without Nemtisor
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
page 22
Agglomerations – Option AnalysisOption 2 with Nemtisor
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Cost Data Base – Wastewater Networks
Settlement Size Area Density Sewer Length
Specific Connection
Rate Specific Length
P.E. ha P.E./ha m P.E./m m/P.E.
1.095 110 10 7.800 0,14 7,1
2.611 204 13 11.400 0,23 4,4
2.891 238 12 15.700 0,18 5,4
18.336 732 25 49.100 0,37 2,7
95.914 1.367 70 111.400 0,86 1,2
Density Specific Length
Specific Connection
Rate
P.E./ha m/P.E. P.E./m
10 6,34 0,16
15 4,44 0,23
20 3,44 0,2930 2,41 0,41
40 1,87 0,53
50 1,54 0,65
60 1,31 0,76
70 1,14 0,87
80 1,02 0,98
page 23
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Agglomerations – Option Analysis and Cost Tables
Name of Agglomeration: Targu-Neamt (ID der Agglomeration als Dateiname verwenden!)
ID of Agglomeration: NT_013 (Name County_Fortlaufende Nummer)
Data Base
Infiltration Water in Wastewater System 30,00 %
p.e.ak Factor for max. Dry Weather Run-Off 10,00 1/x
Name of Settlemen
tID of Settlement Capita
Supplement Industry
%
Supplement Industry
p.e.
Sp.e.c. Water Cons.
l/Cap/d
Waste Water Contribution
%Total p.e. ha
Pop. DensityCap./ha
Qd m³/d Qmax m³/s
VANATORI-NEAMT 161 5.212 15% 0 135 100 5.994 412,8 12,6 1.052 0,0292
HUMULESTI 92 5.968 15% 0 135 100 6.863 238,0 25,1 1.204 0,0335
BLEBEA 93 2.745 10% 0 135 100 3.020 109,6 25,0 530 0,0147
TARGU-NEAMT 162 12.368 15% 0 165 100 14.223 493,8 25,0 3.051 0,0847
Totals for Agglomeration 26.293 30.100 1.254,2 24,0 5.837 0,1621
Already connected Total p.e. to Network and WWTP 0
Additionally connected Total p.e. 30.100
100%
Investment Cost
Civil Works
Pos. Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Euro Category
1 Wastewater System Vanatori-Neamt 26.912 m 175 4.709.603 4
2 Wastewater System Humulesti 16.848 m 175 2.948.357 4
3 Wastewater System Blebea 7.757 m 175 1.357.535 4
4 Wastewater System Targu-Neamt, 50 % new for rehabilitation and extension 17.475 m 175 3.058.185 4
5 Gravity Line Vanatori Neamt - Humulesti, DN 400 1.600 m 240 384.000 2
6 Gravity Line Humulesti - Blebea, DN 500 1.850 m 300 555.000 2
7 PS Humulesti Noi 1 lump sum 15.000 15.000 3
8 Pressure Line Humulesti Noi - Humulesti, 110 x 6,6 1.300 m 80 104.000 3
9 Gravity Line Humulesti Noi - Humulesti, DN 200 360 m 155 55.800 2
10 PS Blebea 1 lump sum 36.000 36.000 3
11 Pressure Line Blebea - WWTP, 355 x 32,2 2.300 m 190 437.000 3
12 WWTP Targu Neamt is sufficient for 17.000 P.E., Plant has to be extended 1 lump sum 1.768.460 1.768.460 1
Subtotal 15.428.939
Electromechanical Works
Pos. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Euro Category
1 1 lump sum 1.178.973 1.178.973 1
2 PS Humulesti Noi 1 lump sum 23.000 23.000 3
3 PS Blebea 1 lump sum 26.000 26.000 3
Subtotal 1.227.973
Summary of Investment
Total Investment Euro 16.656.912
Sp.e.cific Investment related to Total p.e. in Agglomeration Euro/p.e. 553
Allocation according to Master Plan structure
No. Item Description Unit Quantity Unit Cost Total Costs
NT_013
2.1 WWTP pieces 1 2.947.433 2.947.433
2.2 Main Collector m 3.810 261 994.800
2.3 Pumping Station Pumping Station including Pressure
pieces 2 320.500 641.000
2.4 Wastewater Network m 68.992 175 12.073.680
connect. rate / specific costs 100% p.e. 30.100 553
16.656.912
Operation Cost
Pos. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Euro/year
1 WWTP Targu Neamt O&M 1 lump sum 300.997 300.997
2 PS Humulesti Noi O&M 1 lump sum 1.800,00 1.800
3 PS Humulesti Noi Electricity 8.000 kWh 0,15 1.200
4 PS Blebea O&M 1 lump sum 2.000,00 2.000
5 PS Blebea Electricity 143.000 kWh 0,15 21.450
6 Wastewater Network O&M 0,5 % of Investment Cost of Wastewater Network and Main Collectors 1 lump sum 65.350 65.350
392.797
Discounted Present Value (Barwert)
Interest Rate 3,00 %
Project p.e.riod 30,00 years
Writing Off p.e.riod Civil Works 30,00 years
Writing Off p.e.riod Electromechanical Works 15,00 years
Discount Factor Civil Works 0,4120 -
Discount Factor E-M Works 0,6419 -
Discount Factor Op.e.ration Cost 19,6004 -
Total Investment Euro 16.656.912
Discounted Reinvestment Civil Works (none in 30 years) Euro 0
Discounted Reinvestment E-M Works Euro 788.189
Discounted Operation Cost Euro 7.698.995
Discounted Present Value (Barwert) Euro 25.144.096
Option 1, without Nemtisor
Item
WWTP Targu Neamt is sufficient for 17.000 P.E., Plant has to be extended
Operation Cost
Pos. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Euro/year
1 WWTP Targu Neamt O&M 1 lump sum 270.897 270.897
2 PS Humulesti Noi O&M 1 lump sum 1.800,00 1.800
3 PS Humulesti Noi Electricity 8.000 kWh 0,15 1.200
4 PS Blebea O&M 1 lump sum 2.000,00 2.000
5 PS Blebea Electricity 143.000 kWh 0,15 21.450
6 Wastewater Network O&M 0,5 % of Investment Cost of Wastewater Network and Main Collectors 1 lump sum 65.350 65.350
362.697
Discounted Present Value (Barwert)
Interest Rate 3,00 %
Project p.e.riod 30,00 years
Writing Off p.e.riod Civil Works 30,00 years
Writing Off p.e.riod Electromechanical Works 15,00 years
Discount Factor Civil Works 0,4120 -
Discount Factor E-M Works 0,6419 -
Discount Factor Op.e.ration Cost 19,6004 -
Total Investment Euro 16.656.912
Discounted Reinvestment Civil Works (none in 30 years) Euro 0
Discounted Reinvestment E-M Works Euro 788.189
Discounted Operation Cost Euro 7.109.027
Discounted Present Value (Barwert) Euro 24.554.128
Operation Cost
Pos. Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Euro/year
1 WWTP Targu Neamt O&M 1 lump sum 270.897 270.897
2 PS Humulesti Noi O&M 1 lump sum 1.800,00 1.800
3 PS Humulesti Noi Electricity 8.000 kWh 0,15 1.200
4 PS Blebea O&M 1 lump sum 2.000,00 2.000
5 PS Blebea Electricity 143.000 kWh 0,15 21.450
6 Wastewater Network O&M 0,5 % of Investment Cost of Wastewater Network and Main Collectors 1 lump sum 65.350 65.350
362.697
Discounted Present Value (Barwert)
Interest Rate 3,00 %
Project p.e.riod 30,00 years
Writing Off p.e.riod Civil Works 30,00 years
Writing Off p.e.riod Electromechanical Works 15,00 years
Discount Factor Civil Works 0,4120 -
Discount Factor E-M Works 0,6419 -
Discount Factor Op.e.ration Cost 19,6004 -
Total Investment Euro 16.656.912
Discounted Reinvestment Civil Works (none in 30 years) Euro 0
Discounted Reinvestment E-M Works Euro 788.189
Discounted Operation Cost Euro 7.109.027
Discounted Present Value (Barwert) Euro 24.554.128
page 24
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Agglomerations – Option Analysis
Selected: Option 1, Nemtisor and Targu Neamt separate Agglomeration Cluster
OptionDiscounted Present
Value Euro
Option 1,Decentralized Solution
Nemtisor own WWTP 6.790.385
Targu Neamt own WWTP 24.554.128
Total 31.344.514
Option 2,Centralized Solution, Nemtisor and Targu Neamt one WWTP
31.681.108
page 25
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
How to define an Agglomeration in practice
Prepare map on county level indicating: all agglomerations (3 categories according to size) agglomeration boarders (each single agglomeration) Boarder of “cluster of agglomerations” Existing sewer network Existing and proposed WWTP/storage tanks Existing and proposed sewer trunk lines and
pressure mains (interconnection of agglomerations) and main pumping station
Administrative boarders Rivers
26
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Countywide defined agglomerations
Agglomeration Cluster
Examples for Agglomerations – County Level
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
How to define an Agglomeration in practice
Prepare data base for all agglomerations including (at least): Name of agglomeration Generated load (p.e.): total, existing, extension Compliance date Specific investment costs, operation costs and
NPV (€ / p.e.) Scoring rate for Ranking Total investment costs for wastewater
28
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Selection of priority investments
Two step approach: Step 1: Mandatory criteria
Compliance date 2015 ROC established
Step 2: Ranking Size of agglomeration (highest weight) Health improvement Environmental improvement Efficiency improvement
29
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Criteria for Ranking
30
N° CRITERIA INDICATOR
A Size of agglomeration and improvement of connection rate
Total generated load in Population equivalent
Additional load connected in Population equivalent
B Health Risk
B1 water supply system without adequate sanitation system Number of households connected to the water supply but not connected
to the sewer system (or individual/adequate sewer treatment
B2 Existence of sewerage network % of households connected to the sewerage network
B3 Physical condition of sewerage network % of sewer network highly depreciated or with insufficient capacity (high
exfiltration to groundwater, sewerage overflow, etc.)
C Environmental Pollution
C1 Surface water pollution: Existing central sewerage network with
no or inadequate wastewater treatment
% of collected wastewater load discharged without treatment to the
receiving water
C2 Groundwater pollution: Existence of adequate wastewater
collection and treatment facilities
% of total generated wastewater load (p.e.) collected and treated with
effluent quality compliant to UWWTD
Example for criteria and indicators for Wastewater
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Investment Scenarios for priority investment
1. Low Scenario (priority investments up to budget limit given by MESD
2. Medium Scenario minimum investments to reach compliance until 2015
3. High Scenario extended investments including additional agglomerations with compliance date beyond 2015 proposed in phase I
31
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Final Selection of Priority Investments
Discuss with MESD Investment SCENARIO (based on criteria and investment scenario)
Agree on agglomerations to be included in CF project
Prepare priority investment table (template for priority investment costs)
32
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIAAgglomeration boarders for
selected Priority Investment Measures
Prepare detailed map for selected priority investment measures (Scale 1 : 25.000) Detailed boarders of agglomerations Cluster boarders Existing/Proposed Infrastructure
(WWTP, main sewers etc.) Review/confirm option analysis
33
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Phasing of Investment Measures
Based on agreed priority investment measures:
Prepare Long-term investment table (template for long term investment costs)
Prepare Map with phasing of agglomerations (categorise in 3 main phases)
34
MINISTERUL MEDIULUI ŞI DEZVOLTĂRII DURABILE ROMANIA
Approval by Local Authorities (LA)
Approval of LA on investment list is mandatory!!
Maps of agglomerations should be included in the Urbanism Plan (by LA)
FS might start in parallel with MP approval for the endorsed investments
35