Material Selection of Smartphone Body Shell [Autosaved].ppt 2

Post on 10-Aug-2015

80 views 2 download

Transcript of Material Selection of Smartphone Body Shell [Autosaved].ppt 2

By Muhammad Harith

Outline

BackgroundFracture Toughness

Thermal ConductivityStiffness

Embodied Energy

Aluminum

Density : 2.5 ~ 2.7 g/cm^3

Polycarbonate

Molecular Structure of PC

-thermoplastic polymers-they are polymers containing carbonate groups (–O–(C=O)–O–).

Evolution

Years iPhone Samsung Galaxy

2007 iPhone 1G -

2008 iPhone 3G -

2009 iPhone 3GS Galaxy

2010 iPhone 4 Galaxy S

2011 iPhone 4S Galaxy S2

2012 iPhone 5 Galaxy S3

2013 iPhone 5S and 5C Galaxy S4

2014 - Galaxy S5

DesignCriteria:•To protect the core system of a smartphone.•The compression and tension which happen in bending can affect the functionality of the phone and might as well causes the phone to break easily•To avoid any plastic deformation•Assumption: the shell must be an elastic beam

Objective

Objective :Optimizing fracture toughness and minimizing the mass

Fracture Toughness

Ashby Materials Chart: Fracture Toughness vs Elastic Limit

Chart 1

Table of Materials and their Material Indices

Material Fracture Toughness / MPa*m^1/2 Yield Strength/ MPa Material IndexAluminum 35 500 0.07

CFRP 88 1050 0.083809524Magnesium 18 400 0.045

Polycarbonate 4.6 70 0.065714286Epoxies 2.22 71.7 0.030962343PMMA 1.6 72.4 0.022099448

Table 1

Thermal Conductivity

Table of Materials and their Material Indices

Table 2

Material Thermal Conductivity (W/m*K) Thermal Conductivity^2 Density(g/cm^3) Material IndexAluminum 76 5776 2.7 6.41223E-05Magnesium 1.28 1.6384 1.74 0.35077676

CFRP 50 2500 1.5 0.000266667Ploycarbonate 0.19 0.0361 1.114 24.86609607

Epoxies 0.18 0.0324 1.11 27.80558336PMMA 0.08 0.0064 1.16 134.6982759

Stiffness

Ashby Materials Chart: Young Modulus vs Density

Chart 2

Table of Materials and their Material Indices

Table 3

Material Modulus (MPa)Modulus^(1/2) Density(g/cm^3) Material IndexAluminum 82 9.055385138 2.7 3.353846347Magnesium 47 6.8556546 1.74 3.94003138CFRP 150 12.24744871 1.5 8.164965809Ploycarbonate 2.44 1.562049935 1.114 1.402199224Epoxies 2.35 1.532970972 1.11 1.381054929

Materials and Environment

Carbon Footprint:The greenhouse gas emission from the material production

Ashby Materials Chart: Young Modulus vs Production energy per cubic metre

Chart 3

Table of materials and their material indices

Table 4

Material Modulus (MPa)Modulus^(1/2) Embodied Energy (MJ/kg) Density(g/cm^3) Material IndexAluminum 82 9.055385138 200 2.7 0.016769232Magnesium 47 6.8556546 360 1.74 0.010944532CFRP 150 12.24744871 259 1.5 0.031524965Ploycarbonate 2.44 1.562049935 105 1.114 0.013354278Epoxies 2.35 1.532970972 105 1.11 0.013152904

Conclusion

Reference• Callister, W. D., & Rethwisch, D. G. (2009). Material Science and Engineering : An Introduction (8th ed.).

Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

• Ashby, M. F. (2011). Materials Selection in Mechanical Design (84th ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman.

• Beale, A. (2011, February). Polycarbonate and ABS Engineering Resins Markets See Global

• Tightening. Plastics Business Magazine. Retrieved January 21, 2013, from http://www.plasticsbusinessmag.com/article.asp?ID=91

• Cambridge Engineering Selector, EduPack, 2012, Version 11.9.9

• Kondratov, L. A. (2012). Production and use of stainless steel.Metallurgist, 56(3), 225-228. doi: 1 0.1007/s11015-012-9563-2.• Makarov, G. S. (2002). Production of aluminum alloys: Status and prospects. Metallurgist, 46(11),

doi: 10.1023/A:1022934315484.• Manning, M. (2012, May/June). Global Polycarbonate Demand to Grow by 5% a Year.Medical

Plastic News.• Material Hardness. (n.d.). The Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering. Retrieved January 20,

2013, from http://www.calce.umd.edu/

• Pelleg, J., & SpringerLink ebooks - Engineering. (2012).Mechanical properties of materials. New York: Springer Netherlands.