Post on 12-May-2019
Managing GHG EmissionsManaging GHG Emissions(Measure to Manage)( g )
DG ButlerDG ButlerAlliance Group Ltd
TopicsTopics
• Introduction to emissions trading scheme ETS
• AGL’s environment programme EMS• AGL s environment programme EMS
• Emissions profile since 2000 EP
• Utility key performance indicators KPI
• Energy efficiency & conservation EEC
• Where to next? XYZWhere to next? XYZ
Kyoto SpeakKyoto SpeakC b t• Carbon footprints
• Carbon neutral• Carbon tax• AAUs, CERs, RMUs
CP1 CP2• Food Miles• Carbon labelling
• CP1, CP2• Points of Obligation
• Emissions trading• EF+
• Pricing Carbon• LCA
• Sustainability • NZ Units• Participants• Free Allocation
NZ GovernmentNZ Government
DOMESTIC
INTERNATIONAL
NZ and AgricultureNZ and Agriculture• NZ is 0.2% of global emissions (of Kyoto countries)• Agriculture is 49% of NZ total emissions
Livestock emissions - methane - nitrous oxide
• Processing industry - carbon dioxide from electricity and fuels
NZ Greenhouse Gases by Sector in 2005
Industrial 6%
Waste2%
Agriculture48%
Energy44%
‘NZ Meat Inc ’NZ Meat Inc.Industrial Processes SectorIndustrial Processes Sector• 1 July 2010 - Electricity and fuel price increases.• Meat (and milk) processing are not ‘energy intensive’Meat (and milk) processing are not energy intensive
enough to qualify for free allocation of NZ Units.• ‘Protein meal production’ may be EITE. Free allocation
of NZUsof NZUs
Agriculture Sectorg cu u e Sec o• NZ Meat: 22 million tonnes @ $30/t = $660m p.a.*• Meat Processors are Participants in ETS. Not farmers.• Emissions factors for livestock set in regulations• 1 Jan 2011 – Voluntary reporting
*NB. Without transitional assistance by Free Allocation of Units
AGL Environmental ProgrammeAGL Environmental Programme
• Systems based
ISO 14001 EMS– ISO 14001 - EMS
– Enviro-Mark®NZ – Diamond
• Pollution Prevention
• Resource Use and Process Efficiencies
• Climate Change IssuesClimate Change Issues
AGL CO2 Emissions from Processing Energy Use
Nine Season Review (2000-2009)
• Total emissions (tonnes CO2) reduced by 10%Total emissions (tonnes CO2) reduced by 10%
• Production (Meat Equivalents) increased 20%
Combined:
E i i (k CO / ME) d d b 2 % hi– Emission rate (kg CO2 / t ME) reduced by 25% this
decade
AGLAGL CO2 Emissions from Processing Energy Use
AGL CO2 Em iss ions Rate: 00/01 - 08/09ne
ME
2 pe
r ton
kg C
O2
00/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/0900/01 01/02 02/03 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09
Resource and Process Efficiency
Utilities Key Performance Indicator (KPI) weekly reporting– Electricity: GJ / t EFW
– Fuel: GJ / t FAP
– Water: L per SU
GHG emissions t CO e / t ME– GHG emissions: t CO2-e / t ME
• Presented to each plant as weekly, monthly, year to date, and annual trends,
• Targets set and monitored at each plant
KPI Report for the week ending Sat 24 Apr-10
SmithfieldSmithfield
Utility YTD KPI Status Trend
☺ Below target KPI
Ab t t KPI
Electricity (GJ/tonne EFW) 3.10 ☺Above target KPI
KPI lower than last week
KPI higher than last weekWater (litres/le su) 567 ☺
Fuel (GJ/tonne FAP) 3.07 ☺
Weekly Year to date
Electricity: Weekly KPI
EFW
Electricity: YTD KPI
EFW
Ener
gy K
PI, G
J/t E
Ener
gy K
PI, G
J/t E
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
WeekCurrent season Last season
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49Week
Current season Last season
Boiler fuel: YTD KPIBoiler fuel: Weekly KPIEn
ergy
KPI
, GJ/
t FA
P
Ener
gy K
PI, G
J/t F
AP
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
WeekCurrent season Last season1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
Week
E
Current season Last season
Water: Weekly KPIe
suWater: YTD KPI
e su
Wat
er K
PI, l
itres
/le
KPI
, litr
es w
ater
/le
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49Week
W
Current season Last season
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49
WeekCurrent season Last season
CO2 emissions: YTD KPI
e M
.E.
CO2 emissions: annual KPI
e M
.E.
KPI
, kg
CO
2/ton
ne
KPI
, kg
CO
2/ton
n
1 5 9 13 17 21 25 29 33 37 41 45 49Week
Current season CO2 electricity Current season CO2 fuelLast season CO2 fuel Last season CO2 electricty
00/0
1
01/0
2
02/0
3
03/0
4
04/0
5
05/0
6
06/0
7
07/0
8
08/0
9
YearCO2 - fuel CO2 - electricity
Energy ProjectsEnergy ProjectsEECA Audits – Level 3
– Implementing recommendations– $1.3m project costs for $1.4m p.a. savings
Refrigeration Projects– $7.2m costs for $3.9m p.a. savings
Process Reviews
GHG Footprints p
Protein Meal ProductionProtein Meal Production
• Qualifying for free allocation of NZ Units as EITE
industrial processindustrial process.
• All renderers provided energy, production and revenue data for three financial yearsdata for three financial years.
• Govt assessing NZ average emissions intensity and may
set allocative baseline. (Ave t CO2/t MBM)
R d bl t l f NZ U it t f MBM• Renderers able to apply for NZ Units per tonne of MBM.
• Partial compensation for increased energy costs.p gy
Where to Next?Where to Next?I t l t i• Inter-plant comparisons
• Capital development programme• Processing logistics• Processing logistics• Off-setting energy cost increases due to NZETS• Qualifying for free NZ Units from ‘protein meal’• Qualifying for free NZ Units from protein meal
production• Linking to on-farm emissions monitoringg g• NZ ETS – Agriculture
1 Jan 2011 – Voluntary reporting1 J 2012 M d t ti1 Jan 2012 – Mandatory reporting1 Jan 2015 – Full participation
• First formal review of ETS during 2011g
Thank You