Post on 04-Jan-2017
Year 2015 - Level 1
EUROCONTROL
Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) NORWAY
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway Released Issue
DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET
LSSIP for Norway
Infocentre Reference: 16/01/29-82
Document Identifier Edition: Year 2015
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway Edition Date: 25/04/2016
LSSIP Focal Point – Rajunesh SHANKAR E-mail: rks@caa.no ATM Inspector
State Focal Point
LSSIP Contact Person - Luca DELL’ ORTO E-mail: luca.dellorto@eurocontrol.int
Unit DPS/PEPR
Status Intended for
Working Draft General Public
Draft Agency Stakeholders
Proposed Issue Restricted Audience
Released Issue
Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)
Path: Y:\03 LSSIP\1. LSSIP States\Norway (NO) - LDO\Year 2015\Released\LSSIP 2015 Norway Released.docx
LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS
1 LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
2 ESSIP Plan Edition 2015 http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr
3 European ATM Portal Working - https://www.eatmportal.eu/working
Public - https://www.atmmasterplan.eu/ 4 ESSIP Report 2014 http://www.eurocontrol.int/pepr
5 STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor
6 Acronyms and abbreviations
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries
7 LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
8 National AIP https://www.ippc.no/norway_aip/current/index.html
9 FAB Performance Plan https://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/ses-performance-scheme-reference-period-2-2015-2019
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway Released Issue
APPROVAL SHEET
With reference to e-mails received from the Chief Executive Officer of Avinor AS (CAA document reference 16/03478-03), Chief Executive Officer of Avinor ANS AS (CAA-N document reference 16/03478-02) and the managing Director of Oslo Lufthavn AS (CAA-N document reference 16/03478-04), the Civil Aviation Authority – Norway is authorized to sign the 2015 Norwegian Local Single Sky Implementation plan, level 1 (CAA-N document reference 16/03478-05) on behalf of the above mentioned stakeholders.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway Released Issue
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 1
Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 4
National ATM Environment ................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1 -1.1 Geographical Scope ................................................................................................................ 5
1.1.1 International Membership ......................................................................................................... 5 1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s) ..................................................................................... 5 1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation ................................................................................. 6
1.2 National Stakeholders .............................................................................................................. 6 1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s) ...................................................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 ANSP(s) .................................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.3 Airports ...................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2.4 Military Authorities ................................................................................................................... 10
Traffic and Capacity ............................................................................................................ 13 Chapter 2 -2.1 Evolution of traffic in Norway ................................................................................................. 13 2.2 Norway ACC SG North .......................................................................................................... 14
2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011-2020 ........................................................................ 14 2.2.2 Summer 2015 performance .................................................................................................... 14 2.2.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 - Summer ................................................................................... 15
2.3 Norway ACC SG East ............................................................................................................ 16 2.3.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011-2020 ........................................................................ 16 2.3.2 Summer 2015 performance .................................................................................................... 17 2.3.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 - Summer ................................................................................... 17
2.4 Norway ACC SG West ........................................................................................................... 18 2.4.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011-2020 ........................................................................ 18 2.4.2 Summer 2015 performance .................................................................................................... 19 2.4.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 - Summer ................................................................................... 19
ESSIP Report recommendations ........................................................................................ 21 Chapter 3 -
National Projects ................................................................................................................. 22 Chapter 4 -
Regional Co-ordination ....................................................................................................... 25 Chapter 5 -5.1 FAB Co-ordination ................................................................................................................. 25 5.2 FAB Projects .......................................................................................................................... 26 5.3 Regional cooperation ............................................................................................................. 27
5.3.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives ............................................................................................. 27 5.3.2 Regional Projects .................................................................................................................... 28
ESSIP Objective Implementation ....................................................................................... 30 Chapter 6 -6.1 Conventions ........................................................................................................................... 30 6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress .......................................................................... 31 6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress ........................................... 50
ANNEXES
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 1 Release Issue
Executive Summary
National ATM Context
No major stakeholder organizational changes have been identified during 2015; however it is decided that Oslo Lufthavn AS, the owner and operator of Oslo Airport, will be merged into Avinor AS and become a division under Avinor AS. Avinor Air Navigation Services AS was established in June 2014, and is 100% owned by Avinor AS.
The construction of the new terminal at Oslo Airport is progressing according to plan, and has not led to any significant delays or disturbance of the operations at the airport. During 2016, parts of the new terminal will be tested and gradually be taken into operation. The grand opening of the new terminal is set to 27. March 2017.
A new ATM system for Bodø Oceanic including data link services such as CPDLC and ADS-C were implemented in March 2015. An extensive upgrade of the main ATM system is planned in 2020.
In 2013, Avinor ANS initiated a project to develop and implement a remote tower solution for selected Avinor airports. In August 2015, a contract was signed with Kongsberg Defence System for the supply of remote towers to 15 airports with possible further expansion in the coming years. The goal is to have the first remote tower operational in 2018.
Traffic and Capacity
Traffic in Norway decreased by 2.6% during Summer 2015 (May to October), when compared to Summer 2014. The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.3% and 2.8% throughout the planning cycle, with an average baseline growth of 1.8%.
The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the average peak hour demand was 50 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 45. No problems are foreseen in the current planning cycle (2016-2020), provided that sufficient staffs are available during peak periods.
ESSIP Objective Implementation
The overall situation in the implementation of 2015 ESSIP Objectives in Norway has improved since 2014. A major upgrade of the ATM system planned in 2020 for Southern Norway and 2022 for Northern Norway will fulfil many of the ATM related objectives marked as late.
Implementation of AOM21.2 (Free Route Airspace) was completed 12 November 2015 together with NEFAB partners. Further system support is planned in the coming years to support cross border FRA and MTCD. AOM 19 (FUA) is planned to be fully operational in 2016.
AOP05 (A-CDM) was fully implemented including procedures for adverse conditions the 01.10.2015.
For ITY-ADQ a new ADQ compliant AIM system is planned operational in 2017.
For business reasons ITY-AGDL (Data Link) will not be implemented in the legacy ATM system and as a result, the implementation is planned together with the major upgrade of the ATM system in 2020 in line with the implementation deadline for Airspace Users.
New objectives such as AOP10 (TBS), AOP11 (AOP), and AOP12 (ATC clearances monitoring) are indicated as “No Plan” and work will be done in 2016 to develop a plan for these objectives.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 2 Release Issue
LSSIP 2015 - Norway
* FOC Date
█ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)
State-related ESSIP Objectives
<=
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling
*
AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management
*
AOM21.1 Implementation of Direct Routing [PCP]
[E] *
AOM21.2 Implement Free Route Airspace [PCP]
[E] *
AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions
*
ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2
*
ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2
*
ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2
*
ATC12.1 Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring
*
ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations
*
ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1
*
ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer
*
COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS
*
COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM
*
FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services
*
FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning
*
FCM04 Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures - phase 1
FCM05 Implementation of interactive rolling NOP [PCP]
[E] *
FCM06 Traffic Complexity Assessment [PCP]
[E] *
INF04 Implement integrated briefing
*
INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD)
*
ITY-ACID Aircraft identification
ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information
*
ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285
*
ITY-AGVCS2 Implement 8,33 kHz air-ground voice channel spacing below FL195
*
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 3 Release Issue
LSSIP 2015 - Norway
* FOC Date
█ Planned implementation date (see legend at the bottom of the table)
ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes
*
ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP)
*
ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability
*
NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV
NAV10 Implement APV procedures
*
SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements
*
SAF11 Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions
*
Airport-related ESSIP Objectives
<=
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
ENGM-Oslo Gardermoen Airport
AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1
*
AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2
*
AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)
*
AOP10 Time Based Separation [PCP]
[E]
AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan [PCP]
[E] *
AOP12 Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring
[PCP]
[E] *
ATC07.1 Implement AMAN tools and procedures
*
ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements
*
ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports
*
Understanding the Table
Objective Completed No Plan
Objective Partly Completed Missing Data
Objective Planned Not Applicable (Norway/Oslo Gardermonen airport does not participate in this obj.)
Late
E= Essential – Master Plan Reference PCP = Pilot Common Project
NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 4 Release Issue
Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation documents (LSSIPs), as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. The LSSIP document – Year 2015 describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2015.
The LSSIP documents are structured into 6 chapters to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organizations, the organizational structure of the main ATM players - civil and military - and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organization and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided in this chapter.
Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;
Chapter 3 provides a set of recommendations extracted from the ESSIP Report which are relevant to the state/stakeholders concerned. The state reports how they have handled those recommendations and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those recommendations;
Chapter 4 provides a set of the main ATM national projects which contribute directly to the implementation of the ATM MP OIs and/or Enablers and ESSIP related Objectives. The description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas are provided by the states per each project included in this chapter;
Chapter 5 deals with the ATM Regional Coordination. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and Projects and also all other regional initiatives and Projects which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the states concerned;
Chapter 6 contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.
Note: Chapter 6 is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.
Note: The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 5 Release Issue
National ATM Environment Chapter 1 -
1.1 Geographical Scope
1.1.1 International Membership
Norway is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since
ECAC 1955
EUROCONTROL 1993
European Common Aviation Area 2007
EEA (European Economic Area) 1992
EASA 2005
ICAO 1947
NATO 1949
ITU 1866
1.1.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s)
The geographical scope of this document addresses the Norway FIR/UIR (since 27 Nov 2003 the Norwegian airspace is established as one single FIR/UIR). Control areas extend between 5500 FT and FL 660. In addition, controlled airspace in Norway also comprises 19 TMAs, and 20 CTRs.
Three offshore control areas, Ekofisk CTA (Established November 2015), Statfjord CTA in the North Sea and Heidrun CTA in the Norwegian Sea, are established to support the helicopter traffic related to the Norwegian oil production. The fourth offshore area (Balder CTA) is planned to be operational with controlled airspace early 2016.
Norway FIR is surrounded by FIRs of 6 States, namely United Kingdom (Scottish FIR), Iceland (Reykjavik FIR), Russia (Murmansk FIR), Finland (Finland FIR), Sweden (Sweden FIR) and Denmark (Copenhagen FIR). Among the above, Russia is the only non-ECAC bordering state.
Bodø Oceanic FIR is a part of the NAT-region and not within the scope of this document.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 6 Release Issue
1.1.3 Airspace Classification and Organisation
Reference is made to AIP Norway:
https://www.ippc.no/norway_aip/current/aip/EN_ENR_1_4_en.pdf
1.2 National Stakeholders
The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Norway are the following:
Avinor AS - The Company owns state airports and plans civil aviation infrastructure. It provides airport and aviation safety services for passengers and airlines and other users of civil aviation installations. Avinor AS fully owns the following two limited companies:
Oslo Lufthavn AS - owner of Oslo Airport
Avinor Air Navigation Services AS (Avinor ANS AS) - the Norwegian Air Navigation Service Provider
Luftfartstilsynet - the Norwegian CAA
The Royal Norwegian Air Force - the Military Aviation Authority of Norway is responsible for Military Airworthiness, Operations and Airports.
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.
Organisational overview
Military Aviation Authority Norway(MAA)
Ministry of Defence
NSA
Civial Aviation Authority Norway(CAA)
Avinor ANS AS Oslo Airport AS
Avinor AS
General AssemblyAvinor AS
Ministry of Transport and Communications
1.2.1 Civil Regulator(s)
1.2.1.1 General information
Civil aviation in Norway is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport and Communications (MoTC). The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The CAA (Luftfartstilsynet) is further detailed in the following sections.
Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible
Legal Basis
Rule-making Luftfartstilsynet (CAA-N)
Luftfartsloven (Civil Aviation Act)
Safety Oversight Luftfartstilsynet (CAA-N)
As above and regulation FOR 2007-01-26 no 99 (BSL G 1-1) on the establishment of a Single European Sky.
Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements
As above
Airspace As above
Economic As above
Environment As above
Security As above
Accident investigation Aircraft Accident Investigation
Board/Norway (AAIB/N)
Luftfartsloven (Civil Aviation Act) and the
Directive for the Accident Investigation Board Norway
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 7 Release Issue
1.2.1.2 Luftfartstilsynet, the Norwegian CAA
Luftfartstilsynet, the Norwegian CAA, is the regulatory body for flight safety in Norway. This includes rulemaking, certification, safety oversight, safety performance monitoring and ATM safety occurrence analysis. The flight safety regulatory function in Norway is independent from the Service Provision function by an organisational separation.
Annual Report published: Y On this link, you can find the annual report for 2014 covering yearly activities of CAA-Norway (Luftfartstilsynet). The 2015 report is not yet published. http://www.luftfartstilsynet.no/incoming/Årsrapport_2014.pdf/BINARY/%C3%85rsrapport%202014.pdf
Web address: http://www.caa.no
An organisational chart giving a more detailed structure of the CAA is found in Annex B.
1.2.2 ANSP(s)
1.2.2.1 Avinor AS
Avinor AS is a state owned limited company fully owned by the Ministry of Transport and Communications. The company owns state airports and plans civil aviation infrastructure. It provides airport and aviation safety services for passengers and airlines and other users of civil aviation installations. AIS is provided by Avinor AS.
1.2.2.2 Avinor ANS AS
Avinor Air Navigation Services AS was established in June 2014 and acts as the largest ANSP in Norway. It is a limited company fully owned by Avinor AS. It provides aerodrome control and approach control services at airports and air traffic enroute services in Norwegian airspace in addition to performing maintenance and operation of the technical infrastructure relating to air navigation services in Norway.
Name of the ANSP: Avinor ANS AS
Governance: State owned limited company
Ownership:
Owned by Avinor AS
Services provided Y/N Comment
ATC en-route Y
ATC approach Y
ATC Airport(s) Y AFIS - Aerodrome Flight Information Services is provided by Avinor AS
AIS N AIS is provided by Avinor AS
CNS Y
MET N Avinor provides MET observations at airports
ATCO training Y
Others
Additional information:
Provision of services in other State(s):
N
Annual Report published: Y On this link, you can find the final report for 2014 and an interim report for 2015 covering yearly activities of the ANSP. https://avinor.no/en/corporate/about-us/reports/reports
Web address: http://www.avinor.no/en/
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 8 Release Issue
1.2.2.3 ATC systems in use
FDPS
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Indra
Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015/2016
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? 2020 (Sector Group West, East and TMA) 2022 (Sector Group North)
ATC Unit Norway ACC (Sector Group North, West, East and TMA)
SDPS
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Raytheon
Upgrade1 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015/2016
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? Tracking functions in legacy SDPS will be replaced by ARTAS Multi-sensor tracker in 2016.
ATC Unit Norway ACC (Sector Group North, West, East and TMA)
1.2.2.4 ATC units
The ACC unit in the Norwegian airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP, is the Norway ACC.
ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks
En-route TMA
Norway ACC Norway FIR
-Sector Group North 6 (7)* 3 Incl. 1 offshore sector
-Sector Group West 12 1 Incl. 3 offshore sectors
-Sector Group East 8 0
-Sector Group TMA 0 2
*): The total number of En-route sectors in SG North is 5 when including the Bodø Oceanic Control sector (not within the geographical scope of this LSSIP).
The Norway ACC is split into 4 Sector Groups (SG) located on 3 different locations. SG North is located in Bodø, SG West is located in Stavanger and SG East and TMA are located in Oslo (Røyken).
The TMA sectors presented above are those sectors co-located with the ACC. There are several other TMAs in Norway; the provision of APP control in these TMAs is done either at the local airport or as a dedicated centralised service providing APP control to more than one airport in a region.
1.2.3 Airports
1.2.3.1 General information
The main airports in Norway are owned and operated by Avinor AS. The following exceptions apply:
Oslo-Gardermoen: The airport is operated by Oslo Lufthavn AS (OSL). Oslo Lufthavn AS is a limited company where all the shares are owned by Avinor AS. ATS is provided by Avinor ANS AS.
Torp Sandefjord Lufthavn: The Airport is owned and operated by Sandefjord Lufthavn AS. 86.5 percent of the shares are municipally owned. 13.5 percent of the shares are owned by private investors. ATS is provided by Avinor ANS AS.
1 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 9 Release Issue
Moss Lufthavn Rygge: The Airport is owned and operated by Rygge Sivile Lufthavn AS (RSL AS). RSL AS is mainly owned by private investors. ATS is provided by Avinor ANS AS.
Four airports in Norway are operated by the Royal Norwegian Air Force. Avinor provides ATS to all of these airports. Avinor operates civil passenger terminals on three of the military operated airports (Bodø, Bardufoss and Andøya Airports). At the one remaining airport, civil passenger terminals are operated by another company (Ørland Airport).
The following AFIS airports are privately owned and are fully operated by the owners; Skien, Notodden, Stord, Ny Ålesund and Svea.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 10 Release Issue
1.2.3.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP
Referring to the List of Airports in the ESSIP Plan – Part I Section 4, it is up to the individual State to
decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those objectives.
In Norway, only Oslo Airport Gardermoen is covered in this LSSIP.
1.2.4 Military Authorities
The Chief of Staff of the RNoAF is the Military Aviation Authority. According to the Norwegian Aviation Act, the military is given the authority to issue rules and regulations for Military Aviation (BML).
The Military Aviation Authority is responsible for the education and certification of personnel (Pilots, Air Defence Controllers, Investigation Board Officers, Maintenance and Ground Support Personnel).
Additionally, the Military Aviation Authority is responsible for the Military Aircraft Registry, for the certification of military aircraft and equipment and regulation of Military Airfields.
Their regulatory, service provision and user role in ATM are detailed below.
Information on the application of FUA is in 1.2.4.4.
1.2.4.1 Regulatory role
Regulatory framework and rule-making
OAT GAT
OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?
*) Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?
N
Level of such legal provision: OAT: Military legislation (BML) ANS to OAT: CAA regulation (BSL)
Level of such legal provision: N/A
Authority signing such legal provision: Ministry of Transport
Authority signing such legal provision: N/A
These provisions cover: These provisions cover:
Rules of the Air for OAT Y
Organisation of military ATS for OAT N/A Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A
OAT/GAT Coordination N/A OAT/GAT Coordination N/A
ATCO Training N/A ATCO Training N/A
ATCO Licensing N/A ATCO Licensing N/A
ANSP Certification N/A ANSP Certification N/A
ANSP Supervision N/A ANSP Supervision N/A
Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N/A
Aircrew Licensing Y
*) Additional Information: MAA regulates OAT. OAT inside segregated airspace will be controlled by military air defence controllers. The responsibility for separation between non-participating air traffic and OAT inside segregated airspace rests with the civil ANSP and is described in the national FUA agreement (FUA level 1) and the established LoA between the Royal Norwegian Air Force and Avinor (FUA level 3). ANS provision to OAT outside segregated airspace is to be regulated through CAA. The need for ANS to OAT in shall be described in ANSP handbooks.
Additional Information:
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 11 Release Issue
Oversight
1.2.4.2 Service Provision role
Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?
N/A If YES, since:
N/A Duration of the Certificate:
N/A
Certificate issued by: N/A -
Additional Information:
National AIP N National AIP N/A
National Military AIP N National Military AIP N/A
EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A
Other: - Other: -
OAT GAT
National oversight body for OAT: Military Aviation Authority
NSA (as per BSL G 1-1) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A
Additional information: - Additional information: -
OAT GAT
Services Provided: Services Provided:
En-Route Avinor En-Route Avinor
Approach/TMA Avinor Approach/TMA Avinor
Airfield/TWR/GND
Avinor Airfield/TWR/GND Avinor
AIS Avinor AIS Avinor
MET The Norwegian Meteorological Institute
MET The Norwegian Meteorological Institute
SAR Joint Rescue Coordination Centres
SAR Joint Rescue Coordination Centres
TSA/TRA monitoring
Avinor and RNoAF Air Defence Organisation
FIS Avinor
Other: Other: -
Additional Information: Only TSAs are established in Norway.
Additional Information: CRCs will on request from GAT provide traffic information service
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 12 Release Issue
1.2.4.3 User role
1.2.4.4 Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?
OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y
If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:
Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only N
Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y
Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service N
If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:
No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y
Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF N
CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 N Mode S N ACAS Y
Others:
Military in Norway applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: Y
FUA Level 1 implemented: Y
FUA Level 2 implemented: Y
FUA Level 3 implemented: Y
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 13 Release Issue
Traffic and Capacity Chapter 2 -
2.1 Evolution of traffic in Norway
2015
Traffic in Norway decreased by 2.6% during Summer 2015 (May to October), when compared to Summer 2014.
2016-2020
The EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 0.3% and 2.8% throughout the planning cycle, with an average baseline growth of 1.8%.
0
100.000
200.000
300.000
400.000
500.000
600.000
700.000
800.000
2011 A 2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F
IFR
flig
hts
Norway - Annual IFR Movements
IFR movements - Actuals
IFR movements - Baseline forecast
IFR movements - High forecast
IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast
2012 A 2013 A 2014 A 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F
H -1.2% 4.2% 1.6% 1.3% 1.3% 5.5% 1.8%
B 4.2% 4.0% 1.4% -1.4% 3.0% 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 2.9% 1.0%
L -1.7% 1.4% -0.6% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% -0.3%
ESRA08 B -2.4% -1.1% 1.7% 1.6% 2.3% 2.3% 2.3% 2.2% 2.7% 1.8%
EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2015)IFR flights yearly growth
Norway
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 14 Release Issue
2.2 Norway ACC SG North
2.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011-2020
2.2.2 Summer 2015 performance
Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity
gap Ref value Actual
+0.8 % 57 (0%) 0.06 0.00 No
Average en-route delay per flight slightly decreased to zero min/flight in Summer 2015.
Capacity Plan: Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand Achieved Comments
SNAP (Southern Norway Airspace Project) Yes
Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes
Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Yes
New ATM system in Bodo Oceanic Yes
Maximum configuration: 7 + 1 oceanic Yes
Summer 2015 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2014. During the measured period, the average peak hour demand was 50 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 45.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Peak Day Traffic 719 729 753 753 765
Summer Traffic 558 572 588 609 614
Yearly Traffic 544 555 565 589 588
Summer Traffic Forecast 630 629 629 628 643
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 634 636 638 640 669
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 620 614 611 607 604
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.01 0.04 0.05 0.04 0.00
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
En
rou
te D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
gh
t)
IFR
flig
hts
(D
aily
Ave
rag
e)
ENBDACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2015 to 31/10/2015
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 15 Release Issue
2.2.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 - Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Capacity Plan
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Free Route Airspace Free Route Airspace
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
Airport & TMA Network Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management
Airspace Procedures
Staffing Flexible rostering of ATC staff
Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers
Technical Future ATM
System Capacity
Significant Events
Max sectors 7 + 1 oceanic 7 + 1 oceanic 7 + 1 oceanic 7 + 1 oceanic 7 + 1 oceanic
Capacity increase p.a. Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand
Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 2% N/A
Additional information
2016 2017 2018 20190.09 0.10 0.10 0.110.05 0.05 0.06 0.07Summer
Annual
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesENBDCTA
H 57 0% 58 2% 59 2% 60 2%
Ref. 57 0% 57 0% 57 0% 58 2%
L 57 0% 57 0% 57 0% 57 0%
Open 57 0% 57 0% 57 0% 58 2%
C/R 57 0% 57 0% 57 0% 58 2%
ACC2015
baseline 2016 2017 2018 2019
Capacity ProfilesProfiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
ENBD 57
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 16 Release Issue
2.3 Norway ACC SG East
2.3.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011-2020
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
2016‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 57 57 57 58
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 57 57 57 58
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 57 57 57 58
Capacity Profile ‐ High 57 58 59 60
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 57 57 57 57
Capacity Baseline 57 57
2016 ‐ 2020 Plan 57 58 59 60 60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Cap
acity profile (movements per hour)
ENBDCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Peak Day Traffic 1135 1135 1200 1224 1184
Summer Traffic 911 947 1018 1025 982
Yearly Traffic 884 898 949 961 924
Summer Traffic Forecast 1016 1029 1040 1049 1091
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 1027 1044 1066 1084 1152
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 996 989 993 996 999
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.04 0.83 0.00 0.01 0.10
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.03 0.47 0.00 0.01 0.07
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
En
rou
te D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
gh
t)
IFR
flig
hts
(D
aily
Ave
rag
e)
ENOSACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2015 to 31/10/2015
2016-2020 Planning Period Outlook
No problems are foreseen in the current planning cycle, provided that sufficient staffs are available during peak periods.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 17 Release Issue
2.3.2 Summer 2015 performance
Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity
gap Ref value Actual
-4.2 % 88 (-3%) 0.13 0.10 No
Average en-route delay per flight increased from 0.01 minutes per flight in Summer 2014 to 0.10 minutes per flight in Summer 2015.
Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments
Additional controllers Yes
Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes
Maximum configuration: 7 sectors Yes Maximum 8 available
Summer 2015 performance assessment
The capacity offered was measured with ACCESS at a level of 88, for an average peak demand of 78 (peak 1 hour) and 73 (peak 3 hour).
2.3.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 - Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Capacity Plan
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Free Route Airspace Free Route Airspace
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
Airport & TMA Network Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management
Airspace Procedures
Staffing Recruitment and training of air traffic controllers
Flexible rostering of ATC staff
Technical Future ATM
System Capacity
Significant Events
Max sectors 8 8 8 8 8
Capacity increase p.a. Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand
Reference profile 0% 1% 1% 1% N/A
Additional information
2016 2017 2018 20190.13 0.14 0.15 0.140.13 0.13 0.15 0.14
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesENOSCTA
AnnualSummer
H 89 1% 90 1% 91 1% 93 2%
Ref. 88 0% 89 1% 90 1% 91 1%
L 88 0% 88 0% 88 0% 88 0%
Open 88 0% 89 1% 90 1% 91 1%
C/R 88 0% 89 1% 90 1% 91 1%
ACC2015
baseline 2016 2017 2018 2019
Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
ENOS 88
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 18 Release Issue
2.4 Norway ACC SG West
2.4.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2011-2020
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
2016‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 88 89 90 91
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 88 89 90 91
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 88 89 90 91
Capacity Profile ‐ High 89 90 91 93
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 88 88 88 88
Capacity Baseline 91 88
2016 ‐ 2020 Plan 89 90 91 93 93
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100Cap
acity profile (movements per hour)
ENOSCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Peak Day Traffic 805 831 880 900 883
Summer Traffic 619 653 696 708 697
Yearly Traffic 588 625 663 677 664
Summer Traffic Forecast 711 719 727 739 758
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 719 731 743 756 791
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 702 700 703 704 705
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.13 0.02 0.12 0.08 0.06
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.12 0.01 0.07 0.05 0.04
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
En
rou
te D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
gh
t)
IFR
flig
hts
(D
aily
Ave
rag
e)
ENSVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2015 to 31/10/2015
2016-2020 Planning Period Outlook
No problems are foreseen in the current planning cycle, provided that sufficient staff are available during peak periods.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 19 Release Issue
2.4.2 Summer 2015 performance
Traffic Evolution 2015 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity
gap Ref value Actual
-1.5 % 64 (+2%) 0.11 0.06 No
Average en-route delay per flight slightly decreased from 0.08 minutes per flight in Summer 2014 to 0.06 minutes per flight in Summer 2015.
Capacity Plan +10% Achieved Comments
SNAP (Southern Norway Airspace Project) Yes
Flexible rostering of ATC staff Yes
Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers Yes
Re-assessment of sector capacities with CAPAN No Planned now for 2016
Maximum configuration: 4 + 2 helicopter Yes
Summer 2015 performance assessment
The capacity baseline of 64 was measured with ACCESS, indicating the capacity actually offered. During the measured period, the average peak demand was 59 (peak 1 hour) and 53 (peak 3 hour).
2.4.3 Planning Period 2016-2020 - Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Capacity Plan
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Free Route Airspace Free Route Airspace
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
Airport & TMA Network
Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management
Airspace Procedures
Staffing Flexible rostering of ATC staff
Recruitment and training to maintain number of air traffic controllers
Technical Future ATM
System Capacity
Significant Events
Max sectors 4 + 2 helicopter 4 + 2 helicopter 4 + 2 helicopter 4 + 2 helicopter 4 + 2 helicopter
Capacity increase p.a.
Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand
Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 2% N/A
2016 2017 2018 20190.13 0.12 0.11 0.110.13 0.13 0.11 0.11
En-route ATFM delay breakdown - Reference ValuesENSVCTA
AnnualSummer
H 64 0% 64 0% 65 2% 67 3%
Ref. 64 0% 64 0% 64 0% 65 2%
L 64 0% 64 0% 64 0% 64 0%
Open 64 0% 64 0% 65 2% 65 0%
C/R 64 0% 64 0% 65 2% 65 0%
ACC2015
baseline 2016 2017 2018 2019
Capacity ProfilesProfiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
ENSV 64
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 20 Release Issue
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
2016‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 64 64 64 65
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 64 64 65 65
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 64 64 65 65
Capacity Profile ‐ High 64 64 65 67
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 64 64 64 64
Capacity Baseline 63 64
2016 ‐ 2020 Plan 64 64 65 67 67
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Cap
acity profile (movements per hour)
ENSVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
2015-2019 Planning Period Outlook
No problems are foreseen in the current planning cycle, provided that sufficient staff are available during peak periods
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 21 Release Issue
ESSIP Report recommendations Chapter 3 -
Recommendations issued from the ESSIP Report for 2014 applicable to Norway or all items that require corrective actions and improvements.
REC-2014-2
Local Stakeholders that declared delays in implementation of FCM01, AOP04.1, SAF10, INF04, NAV03, AOP03, ENV01, ITY-AGDL, ITY-ADQ, COM09, COM10, ITY-FMTP and ITY-COTR, to take corrective measures to reduce the implementation delays.
Local Stakeholders
Corrective actions taken:
YES
Description:
More than 75 percent of the mentioned objectives are either “Completed, Partly Completed or Planned”. The status for the objectives reported as late (FCM01, ITY-AGDL, ITY-ADQ and COM10) will be followed up closely the next years.
REC-2014-06
(equal to REC-2013-15)
The ANSPs within a FAB should coordinate their system renewal and capability evolution more closely in order to deliver larger scale performance improvements to customers.
FAB ANSPs
Corrective actions taken:
YES
Description:
Up-grading of the FAB partner’s ATM systems is a continuous process whereby new functionalities are regularly introduced in order to satisfy new regulatory requirements and evolving business needs. This process is harmonised and coordinated within NEFAB and as long as the new functionalities are in accordance with the interoperability regulation, the joint capability evolution is handled by focusing on the operational and technical interfaces connecting the different FAB partners. In this way the effect of having ATM systems provided by different system manufacturers is handled efficiently.
Within NEFAB common project plans for certain ESSIP objectives, e.g. AOM21.2, AOM19 and ITY-AGDL have been developed.
Such FAB-wide common project planning shall and will take place also for the remaining FAB-wide
interconnecting functionalities such as e.g. ITY-COTR, ITY-FMTP, ATC17, COM09 and COM10.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 22 Release Issue
National Projects Chapter 4 -
Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references
Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas
AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO)
ARTAS Integration (ARTAS)
The project will implement ARTAS as a Multi Sensor Tracker to provide system tracks to the ATM system.
Delayed, Planned operational in 2016.
Need more tuning in order to improve tracking in some areas.
ESSIP:ITY-ACID, ITY-SPI
OI-Steps: -
Other: -
Capacity: -
Safety: Better tracker performance will improve safety nets.
Environment: -
Cost-Efficiency: -
Bodø Oceanic ATM System (BOAS)
The BOAS system will replace the old ATM system for the Bodø Oceanic area. Bodø Oceanic is outside scope of SES regulation but the implementation of BOAS will enable more efficient flight profiles, automated coordination with adjacent centers through OLDI, CPDLC and ADS-C.
Complete The system went operational in 2015.
ESSIP:-
OI-Steps: -
Other: -
Capacity: Improved capacity
Safety: -
Environment: Better flight efficiency through more direct routing and more optimal cruising levels.
Cost-Efficiency: -
Ekofisk ADS-B Implementation
The project will implement ADS-B in the Ekofisk offshore sector as an enabler for controlled airpspace.
Complete Controlled airspace was implemented 19.11.2015.
ESSIP:ITY-ACID
OI-Steps: -
Other: -
Capacity: Implementation of SUR will improve the capacity in the offshore airspace
Safety: Implementation of SUR and upgrade to controlled airspace will improve the safety for the en-route segment.
Environment: Upgrade will enable more efficient flight profiles
Cost-Efficiency: The investment cost for implementing an ADS-B system in the offshore area compared to a radar installation is much lower.
Future ATM System (FAS)
The project will deliver a new ATM system built to handle future demands and fulfil PCP requirements.
The first Version of the ATM system is planned to be operational in 2020.
The project is in an early stage and the design phase will be done in 2016.
ESSIP:ATC02.5, ATC02.6, ATC02.7, ATC12.1, ATC17, FCM01, FCM03, FCM06, ITY-ACID, ITY-AGDL, ITY-COTR
OI-Steps: AUO-0301, CM-0101, CM-0103-
Capacity: Improved Capacity
Safety: Improved Safety due to implementation of New Safety Net functionality
Environment: -
Cost-Efficiency: Improved Cost efficiency
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 23 Release Issue
Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references
Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas
A, CM-0201, CM-0202, CM-0203, CM-0205, CM-0207-A, CM-0801, IS-0102
Other: -
NATCON South
Consolidation and update of ATM system platform for Southern Norway including Oslo ATCC and Stavanger ATCC. The upgrade is an enabler for implementation of Free Route Airspace.
Complete The project was completed in November 2015.
ESSIP:AOM21.2
OI-Steps: AOM-0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM-0502, CM-0102-A
Other: -
Capacity: -
Safety: -
Environment: -
Cost-Efficiency: Reduced support costs through the reduction of number of supported platforms from three to two
Norwegian Radar, WAM, and ADS-B Implementation Project (NORWAM)
The NORWAM Project will implement surveillance according to the Avinor Surveillance Masterplan. The project is divided into "WAM Westcoast" that will cover WAM SUR for the western part of Norway and "Nationwide WAM and ADS-B" that will cover the rest of the country.
"WAM Westcoast" is delayed until 05.2016 and "Nationwide WAM and ADS-B" will be operational gradually from 12.2017 until 2020. In addition all MSSR's will be using Mode S by 12.2018.
NORWAM is under implementation.
ESSIP:ITY-ACID, ITY-SPI
OI-Steps: -
Other: -
Capacity: Improved SUR coverage contributes to reduced separation minima and improved capacity.
Safety: Improved SUR will improve safety.
Environment: Improved SUR coverage contributes to more optimal flight profiles resulting in reduced pollution.
Cost-Efficiency: WAM and ADS-B implementation have reduced investment and operational cost in comparison to radar.
Performance Based Navigation (PBN)
Implementation of PBN and APV on Norwegian airports according to the Norwegian PBN implementation plan.
Operational latest 31.12.2016.
The implementation is proceeding and several airports have implemented APV. The implementation will continue until 12.2016.
ESSIP:NAV10
OI-Steps: AOM-0602, AOM-0604
Other: -
Capacity: Increased capacity
Safety: Safety improvement due to gradual elimination of non-precision approaches will reduce the potential for CFIT.
Environment: -
Cost-Efficiency: Reduced investment cost
AVINOR AS (NO)
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 24 Release Issue
Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references
Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas
ADQ-implementation program (ADQ)
The project will implement commission Regulation 73/2010, laying down requirements on the quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information throughout Avinor's organization. Both for Avinor's aerodromes with regards to data origination, and for Avinor as ANSP with regards to AIM.
Implementation planned 07.2017
Implementing ADQ-compliant AIM-system. Analysing data and data originator systems within Avinor.
ESSIP:ITY-ADQ
OI-Steps: IS-0202, IS-0204
Other: -
Capacity: -
Safety: -
Environment: -
Cost-Efficiency: -
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 25 Release Issue
Regional Co-ordination Chapter 5 -
5.1 FAB Co-ordination
North European Functional Airspace Block - NEFAB
NEFAB was established by Estonia, Finland, Latvia and Norway in 2012. NEFAB ANSPs have established a programme with the objective of managing projects and initiatives among the ANSPs in the cooperation.
The NEFAB Programme regularly develops and maintains 5 year business plans, and on that basis develops the annual business plans for use by NEFAB ANSPs in order to follow up NEFAB Programme projects and activities. The latest 5 year business plan is covering the period 2016 - 2020 with the annual plan and budget for 2016. The 5 year business plan describes the strategies for the period with key performance areas and strategic objectives. The annual plan transforms these strategies into concrete activities planned for each year with defined deliverables and milestones.
In November 2015 The NEFAB Target Concept Scenario 6 was implemented. The Target Concept is defined in the NEFAB Network Plan, composed of key elements being Free Route Airspace, Service Provision, ASM and FUA concepts as well as rules, procedures and ATM functionalities supporting the concept. The FRA is composed of three volumes being Estonia, Finland and Latvia as one seamless FRA above FL95, and Norway above FL135. FRA in Bodø Oceanic will be implemented above FL195 in accordance with the formal ICAO NAT procedures in summer 2016.
NEFAB FRA will be further developed by implementation of Scenario 8, i.e. NEFAB FRA to be one seamless FRA volume connected seamless with the Danish/Swedish FAB (see 5.3.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives). Due to technical issues, all involved partners will plan and coordinate a final Implementation date for Scenario 8 later.
The individual ANSP´s in the FAB-cooperation will implement the required operational changes and technical support to enable the concept described in the NEFAB Target Concept.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 26 Release Issue
5.2 FAB Projects
Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references
Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas
AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO)
NEFAB Target Concept (Scenario 8)
Implement FRA in Bodoe Oceanic NAT region
Summer 2016 in accordance with ICAO procedures in NAT region
Active, on time ESSIP:AOM21.2
OI-Steps: AOM-0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM-0502, CM-0102-A
Other: -
Capacity: Present or additional capacity
Safety: Present or improved safety
Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users
Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency
AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LGS (LV)
NEFAB Target Concept (Scenario 8)
Implement seamless FRA volume across all NEFAB States
To be decided
Late ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2
OI-Steps: AOM-0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM-0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203
Other: -
Capacity: Present or additional capacity
Safety: Present or improved safety
Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users
Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 27 Release Issue
5.3 Regional cooperation
5.3.1 Regional Cooperation Initiatives
North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) programme
NEFAB is closely cooperating with DK SE FAB with an agreed concept to implement a continuous and seamless FRA from a user perspective across the two FABs (North European Free Route Airspace (NEFRA) Programme). The NEFRA concept is implementation of a seamless interface in Scenario 8 between the two FABs above FL285 (Danish-Swedish FAB FRA is above FL285). In November 2015, the first milestone of NEFRA (Scenario 6) was implemented with harmonized FPL rules for FRA operations across the two FABs. Scenario 8 with seamless operations across the two FABs is planned; however final implementation date will be decided together with all involved partners later.
Borealis Alliance
The Borealis Alliance Framework Agreement (AFA) is a legal document that sets up a framework for the business co-operation between 9 European ANSPs LFV (Sweden), Finavia (Finland), Avinor (Norway), ISAVIA (Iceland), Naviair (Denmark), EANS (Estonia), IAA (Ireland), LGS (Latvia) and NATS (UK). The vision of Borealis is to be the leading ANSP Alliance that enables its Members to drive better performance for stakeholders through business collaboration. The objective of the Alliance is to enable joint initiatives to improve flight efficiency and reduce environmental impact, delivered across the whole area in a move which will also streamline cost of services and operational/technical infrastructure.
In 2015, the Borealis Alliance initiated the Free Route Airspace (FRA) Programme to implement a multi-FAB FRA covering 3 FABs (NEFAB, DK-SE FAB and UK-IRL FAB) and Iceland. The Borealis concept of operation is based on the NEFRA concept, i.e. to connect the FRA volumes of 9 States seamlessly, so that these appear as one FRA volume to our customers (airspace users).
NORACON
NORACON, the NORth European and Austrian CONsortium, consists of nine members. Swedavia (Swedish airports) and eight European ANS providers: Austro Control (Austria), AVINOR (Norway), EANS (Estonia), Finavia (Finland), IAA (Ireland), ISAVIA (Iceland), LFV (Sweden) and Naviair (Denmark).
The purpose of NORACONs membership in the SESAR Joint Undertaking is to ensure impact from the partners in the development of the future European ATM business.
NORACON will hand off its last deliverables in June 2016. The consortium is expected to be dissolved around 1st quarter 2017, after all commitments towards the SJU have been dealt with.
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 28 Release Issue
5.3.2 Regional Projects
Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references
Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas
AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), IAA-ATS Provider (IE), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), NATS (UK), Naviair (DK)
Borealis FRA Implementation of FRA in Scottish FIR, Interface with NEFAB and DK/SE FAB FRAs.
End of 2018 Active, on-time ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2
OI-Steps: AOM-0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM-0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203
Other: -
Capacity: Present or additional capacity
Safety: Present or improved safety
Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users
Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency
Borealis FRA Implementation of FRA in London FIR, Interface with neighbouring FRA volumes Implementation of FRA in Icelandic Airspace, Interface with neighbouring FRA volumes
End 2021 Active, on time ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2
OI-Steps: AOM-0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM-0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203
Other: -
Capacity: Present or additional capacity
Safety: Present or improved safety
Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users
Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency
AVINOR Air Navigation Services (NO), EANS (EE), FINAVIA (FI), LFV (SE), LGS (LV), Naviair (DK)
NEFRA phase 1 (Scenario 8)
Implementation of seamless interface of NEFAB FRA and DK/SE FAB FRA above FL285
To be decided
Late ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2
OI-Steps: AOM-0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM-0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203
Other: -
Capacity: Present or additional capacity
Safety: Present of improved safety
Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users
Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 29 Release Issue
Name / Code Description - Scope Schedule Status Link with ATM Master Plan / Other references
Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas
NEFRA phase 2 (Scenario 8)
ATM systems upgrade and IFPS integration
End 2017 Active, on time ESSIP:AOM19, AOM21.2
OI-Steps: AOM-0201, AOM-0202, AOM-0205, AOM-0401, AOM-0402, AOM-0501, AOM-0502, CM-0102-A, DCB-0203
Other: -
Capacity: Present or additional capacity
Safety: Present or improved safety
Environment: Present or improved, depending on airspace users
Cost-Efficiency: For the airspace users: improved cost efficiency
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 30 Release Issue
ESSIP Objective Implementation Chapter 6 -
6.1 Conventions
Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’:
o a colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and
o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.
Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**)
State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date
REG (By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement
APO. Progress (**)
APO Impl. Date ASP (By:mm-yyyy) ASP high level progress statement
ASP. Progress (**)
ASP Impl. Date MIL (By:mm-yyyy) MIL high level progress statement
MIL. Progress (**)
MIL Impl. Date APO (By:mm-yyyy) APO high level progress statement
APO. Progress (**)
APO Impl. Date
(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:
ECAC Completed No Plan
EU+ Partly Completed Not Applicable
Multi-N Planned Missing Data
APT Late
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 31 Release Issue
6.2 ESSIP Objectives Implementation progress
AOM13.1
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
Planned
AAMS‐10a(EN), AIMS‐19b(EN), AOM‐0301(OI)
‐
Revision of national regulation (BSG G 2‐1) combined with implementation of ANSP procedures and training shall ensure a timely implementation
10/11/2016
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:12/2018)
Luftfartstilsynet
CAA‐N will revise national legislation BSL G 2‐1 to implement EUROAT. ‐ Planned
10/11/2016
Mil. Authority CAA has started the process to complete the REG‐ SloAs independent of the progression of EUROAT, and will revise national regulation BSL G 2‐1
‐ Planned
10/11/2016
ASP (By:12/2018)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Implement CAA regulation in local operational procedures and train staff in new procedures.
‐ Planned
10/11/2016
MIL (By:12/2018)
Mil. Authority MAA will together with CAA and Avinor assess the different harmonisation documents
‐ Planned
10/11/2016
AOM19
Implement Advanced Airspace Management
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Planned
AAMS‐11(EN), AOM‐0201(OI), AOM‐0202(OI), AOM‐0205(OI), AOM‐0401(OI), DCB‐0203(OI)
‐
Some actions leading to the implementation are already completed, and some are planned. Joint implementation planning taking part in the NEFAB project streams.
30/06/2016
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: FI,NO]
ASP (By:12/2016)
Mil. Authority LARA implementation is planned before June 2016 ‐ Late
30/06/2016
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Some actions are already completed, while the rest is planned inside 2016. Implementation is part of the NEFAB/Borealis Free Route project.
Borealis FRA / Borealis FRA / NEFAB Target Concept / NEFRA phase 1 / NEFRA phase 2
Planned
30/06/2016
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 32 Release Issue
AOM21.1
Implementation of Direct Routing
Timescales:
Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017
[PCP]
[Essential] Not Applicable
AOM‐0401(OI), AOM‐0402(OI), AOM‐0500(OI) [E]
‐
Norway will in Cooperation With NEFAB and Borealis implement Free Route Airspace and therefore implementation of Direct Routing is not relevant.
‐
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2017)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Avinor will in Cooperation With NEFAB and Borealis implement Free Route Airspace and therefore implementation of Direct Routing is not relevant.
‐ Not Applicable
‐
AOM21.2
Implement Free Route Airspace
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
[PCP]
[Essential] Completed
AOM‐0401(OI), AOM‐0402(OI), AOM‐0501(OI) [E], AOM‐0502(OI) [E], CM‐0102‐A(OI) [E]
‐
Cooperation on FAB level to ensure implementation in accordance with plan. First phase of implementation within NEFAB is completed. Second phase for implementation in NEFRA (NEFAB + DK/SE FABs) planned for June 2016.
12/11/2015
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: FI,LV,NO]
ASP (By:12/2021)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
FRA is implemented in cooperation with partners in NEFAB including necessary system improvements. Additional system support will be implemented later to meet PCP requirements.
Borealis FRA / Borealis FRA / NATCON South / NEFAB Target Concept / NEFAB Target Concept / NEFRA phase 1 / NEFRA phase 2
Completed
12/11/2015
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 33 Release Issue
AOP03
Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/04/2003 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013
Completed
AO‐0101(OI)
‐
Objective completed for all Avinor airports. Implementation in military airports with GAT has started 31/12/2013
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:12/2013)
Luftfartstilsynet
‐ ‐ Completed
‐
ASP (By:12/2013)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
The measures from the European action plan has been implemented in Avinor. There is a continuous focus on runway safety through follow‐up of reporting, safety investigations, lesson dissemination and proficiency training plans.
‐
Completed
31/12/2011
APO (By:12/2013)
Oslo Airport
The measures from the European action plan has been implemented at Oslo Airport. There is a coninuous focus on runway safety through follow‐up of reporting, safety investigations, lesson dissemination and proficiency training plans.
‐
Completed
‐
AOP04.1
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level1
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
Completed
AO‐0201(OI), CTE‐S02b(EN), CTE‐S03b(EN), CTE‐S04b(EN)
ENGM ‐ Oslo Gardermoen Airport
Completed with final approval during 2012. 30/06/2012
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:12/2010)
Luftfartstilsynet
An A‐SMGCS system has been approved. There is currently no plan to impement specific A‐SMGCS level 1 procedures in state regulations.
‐ Completed
31/12/2013
ASP (By:12/2011)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
ANSP action followed Airport Operator deployment of equipment and procedures. Final operational approval achied from regulator during 2012.
‐ Completed
30/04/2012
APO (By:12/2010)
Oslo Airport Technical equipment available and procedures and training implemented, included training actions for the ANS provider. Final approval completed during 2012.
‐ Completed
30/04/2012
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 34 Release Issue
AOP04.2
Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
Completed
AO‐0102(OI), AO‐0201(OI), CTE‐S02b(EN), CTE‐S03b(EN), CTE‐S04b(EN)
ENGM ‐ Oslo Gardermoen Airport
System enablers, procedures and training delivered and A‐SMGCS level 2 is implemented. 31/12/2014
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2017)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Procedure development and training of staff is completed and A‐SMGCS Level 2 is operational.
‐ Completed
31/08/2012
APO (By:12/2017)
Oslo Airport Operational implementation of alarm functions, operational procedures for level 2 and training programme is completed.
‐ Completed
30/09/2012
AOP05
Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Completed
AO‐0501(OI), AO‐0601(OI), AO‐0602(OI), AO‐0603(OI)
ENGM ‐ Oslo Gardermoen Airport
Implementation of Airport CDM is completed 10/2015. 01/10/2015
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2016)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Overall implementation of Airport CDM planned for 01/2014. Specific procedures for adverse conditions implemented 01/10/2015.
‐ Completed
31/12/2015
APO (By:12/2016)
Oslo Airport Overall implementation of Airport CDM planned for 01/2014. Specific procedures for adverse conditions implemented 01/10/2015.
‐ Completed
01/10/2015
AOP10
Time Based Separation
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
[PCP]
[Essential] No Plan
AO‐0303(OI) [E]
ENGM ‐ Oslo Gardermoen Airport
Avinor ANS and Oslo Airport will initiate a study to identify necessary changes to implement TBS. Outcome of this study will give details needed to plan the implementation.
‐
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:12/2023)
Luftfartstilsynet
Avinor ANS and Oslo Airport will initiate a study to identify necessary changes to implement TBS. Outcome of this study will give details needed to plan the implementation.
‐ No Plan
‐
ASP (By:12/2023)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Avinor ANS and Oslo Airport will initiate a study to identify necessary changes to implement TBS. Outcome of this study will give details needed to plan the implementation.
‐ No Plan
‐
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 35 Release Issue
AOP11
Initial Airport Operations Plan
Timescales:
Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2021
[PCP]
[Essential] No Plan
AO‐0801‐A(OI) [E]
ENGM ‐ Oslo Gardermoen Airport
Oslo Airport consider whether they should implement AOP or not. This will be evaluated during 2016. ‐
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2021)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
‐ ‐ No Plan
‐
APO (By:12/2021)
Oslo Airport Oslo Airport consider whether they should implement AOP or not. This will be evaluated during 2016.
‐ No Plan
‐
AOP12
Improve runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
[PCP]
[Essential] No Plan
AERODROME‐ATC‐36(EN), AO‐0104‐A(OI) [E]
ENGM ‐ Oslo Gardermoen Airport
Oslo Airport will in 2016 commence a study related to implementation of a new ATM system. Improved runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring will first be available when a New ATM system for Tower is implemented.
‐
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2020)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Oslo Airport will in 2016 commence a study related to implementation of a new ATM system. Improved runway and airfield safety with ATC clearances monitoring will first be available when a New ATM system for Tower is implemented. At this stage it is correct to report "No Plan".
‐
No Plan
‐
APO (By:12/2020)
Oslo Airport
Oslo Airport will in 2016 commence a study related to implementation of a new ATM system. Improved runway and airfield safety with ATC cearances monitoring will first be available when a New ATM system for Tower is implemented. At this stage it is correct to report "No Plan".
‐
No Plan
‐
ATC02.5
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Area Proximity Warning ‐ level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Late
CM‐0801(OI)
‐
Implementation will be planned as part of a major upgrade of the ATM system. The new ATM system is planned to be operational by 2020.
31/12/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2016)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Implementation will be planned as part of a major upgrade of the ATM system. The new ATM system is planned to be operational by 2020.
Future ATM System
Late
31/12/2020
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 36 Release Issue
ATC02.6
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Minimum Safe Altitude Warning ‐ level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Late
CM‐0801(OI)
‐
Implementation will be planned as part of a major upgrade of the ATM system. The new ATM system is planned to be operational by 2020.
31/12/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2016)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Implementation will be planned as part of a major upgrade of the ATM system. The new ATM system is planned to be operational by 2020.
Future ATM System
Late
31/12/2020
ATC02.7
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Late
CM‐0801(OI)
‐
Implementation will be planned as part of a major upgrade of the ATM system. The new ATM system is planned to be operational by 2020.
31/12/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2016)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Implementation will be planned as part of a major upgrade of the ATM system. The new ATM system is planned to be operational by 2020.
Future ATM System
Late
31/12/2020
ATC07.1
Implement AMAN tools and procedures
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
Completed
TS‐0102(OI)
ENGM ‐ Oslo Gardermoen Airport
AMAN was installed approved for operational test since November 2009. The system entered full operational use as part of the Oslo ASAP project in April 2011.
30/04/2011
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2015)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Completed as part of the Oslo ASAP project ‐ Completed
30/04/2011
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 37 Release Issue
ATC12.1
Implement automated support for conflict detection, resolution support information and conformance monitoring
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
Planned
CM‐0202(OI), CM‐0203(OI), CM‐0205(OI), CM‐0207‐A(OI)
‐
MTCD and Monitoring Functions will be implemented with the new ATM system and planned operational befrore 31/12/2021.
31/12/2021
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2021)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
MTCD and Monitoring Functions will be implemented with the new ATM system and planned operational before 31/12/2021.
Future ATM System
Planned
31/12/2021
ATC15
Implement, in En‐Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
Completed
TS‐0305(OI)
‐
Implemented at Oslo ATCC as a consequence of new airspace structure from 04/2011. Other areas under consideration.
30/04/2011
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2017)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
AMAN information mechanism, tools and procedures to support Basic AMAN operations are implemented in En‐route airspace in Oslo AoR. Other areas under consideration.
‐ Completed
30/04/2011
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 38 Release Issue
ATC16
Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
Late
PRO‐AC‐21(EN)
‐
CAA‐N Operations Department has been in regular contact with all of the operators covered by this requirement (excluding MIL). Based on the feedback CAA‐N has received, all aircraft operated by Norwegian operators are now modified and crews have completed the required training. This objective is marked as reflecting MIL status.
31/12/2018
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:12/2015)
Luftfartstilsynet
CAA‐N Operations Department has been in regular contact with all of the operators covered by this requirement (excluding MIL). Based on the feedback CAA‐N has received, all aircraft operated by Norwegian operators are now modified and crews have completed the required training.
‐
Completed
31/12/2015
ASP (By:03/2012)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Training Organization in Avinor FS AS has requested the relevant parts of the ANSP organization about the status for training in the system. Based on the fact that most units already has completed training as a part of continuation training when the system were incorporated, the training organization has decided to offer training only to the air traffic controllers that has not completed training in the new system. Follow up of performance will be done by means of regular incident occurence reporting, investigation and analysis.
‐
Completed
‐
MIL (By:12/2015)
Mil. Authority No plan on 3 aircraft systems and planned on 1 aircraft system (see MIL SLoA ATC16‐MIL01).
‐ Late
31/12/2018
ATC17
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
Late
CM‐0201(OI)
‐
Full functionality will be availble after upgrade of the ATM system by end of 2020. 31/12/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2018)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Full functionality will be availble after upgrade of the ATM system by end of 2020.
Future ATM System
Late
31/12/2020
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 39 Release Issue
COM10
Migrate from AFTN to AMHS
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2014
Late
CTE‐C06c(EN)
‐
Basic AHMS is implemented. Implementation of Enhanced AHMS is pending national decisions. Detailed implementation activities will be planned accordingly.
31/12/2017
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2014)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Basic AMHS by AFTN/AMHS gateway is operational. Implementation of extended AMHS is planned in 2017.
‐ Late
31/12/2017
COM11
Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
Planned
CTE‐C05a(EN)
‐
The ANSP has started initial planning, including dialogue with system suppliers and network service providers. First planned implementation is a VoIP VCS for HF communication for Bodø OAC. A mature implementation plan will be developed in 2016.
31/12/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2020)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Initial planning started, including dialogue with system suppliers and network service providers.
‐ Planned
31/12/2020
ENV01
Implement Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) techniques for environmental improvements
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013
Partly Completed
AOM‐0701(OI)
ENGM ‐ Oslo Gardermoen Airport
CDA awareness camapaign and controller working methods implemented to allow for CDA under specific conditions. Initial trials with reporting from airline operators are done, but monitoring is not sufficiently systematic to provide exact data on effects of CDA. Complete and systematic monitoring is planned in 2016.
31/12/2016
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2013)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
CDA awareness campaign conducted. Includes use of information material for operational staff and managers. Improved TMA‐procedures implemented 03/2013. Measurement through use of noise and trajectory monitoring system planned for 2014.
‐
Completed
31/12/2014
APO (By:12/2013)
Oslo Airport CDA implementation at airport is delivered through actions by the ANSP. ‐
Partly Completed
31/12/2016
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 40 Release Issue
ENV02
Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Completed
AO‐0703(OI), AO‐0705(OI), AO‐0706(OI)
ENGM ‐ Oslo Gardermoen Airport
Formal partnership arrangements are in place at Oslo Airport to evaluate and control the environmental effect of Air Traffic Procedures.
31/12/2012
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2016)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Local ANSP participates actively in meetings, consultation arrangements and briefings related to environmental effect of aircraft operations.
‐ Completed
31/12/2012
APO (By:12/2016)
Oslo Airport
Partnership arrangements are established through the use of regular meetings, involving ANSP and users. The collaborative arrangements include the use of data derived from the airport´s noise and trajectory monitoring systems.
‐
Completed
31/12/2012
FCM01
Implement enhanced tactical flow management services
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006
Late
IS‐0102(OI)
‐
A number of SLoA's are already implemented. The two remaining SLoA's (ASP06 and ASP07) will be implemented in the new ATM system, planned for 12/2020
31/12/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:07/2014)
Oslo Airport DPI Message from Oslo Airport is (ASP08) is completed. ‐ Completed
‐
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
The most improtant SLoAs (ASP02, ASP03 and ASP04) are implemented. System generated messages to CFMU related to re‐routings and holding are not implemented, and is done manually.
Future ATM System
Late
31/12/2020
FCM03
Implement collaborative flight planning
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
Late
IS‐0102(OI)
‐
Some SLoAs are completed ‐ the remaining are either reported as Late with a plan for implementation or No plan (implementation plan yet to be developed). The Overall State Progress is "Late".
31/12/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2017)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
AFP processing is included in system upgrade planned for late mid 2016. Flight plan message processing in ADEXP format planned with a major system Upgrade in 2020.
Future ATM System
Late
31/12/2020
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 41 Release Issue
FCM04
Implementation of Short Term ATFCM Measures ‐ phase 1
(Outside Applicability Area)
Timescales:
‐ not applicable ‐
Not Applicable
DCB‐0205(OI)
‐
Not applicable for Norway ‐
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2015)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
N/A for Norway ‐ Not Applicable
‐
FCM05
Implementation of interactive rolling NOP
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
[PCP]
[Essential] Planned
AOM‐0202(OI), AOM‐0205(OI), DCB‐0102(OI), DCB‐0103‐A(OI) [E], IS‐0901‐A(OI) [E]
‐
LARA and PRISMIL are planned for implementation during June 2016. 31/12/2021
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2017)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
LARA and PRISMIL are planned for implementation during June 2016. ‐ Planned
30/06/2016
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ Planned
30/06/2016
APO (By:12/2021)
Oslo Airport NM receives data through connection to EU ACA. Integration of AOP and NOP is not started yet.
‐
Partly Completed
31/12/2021
FCM06
Traffic Complexity Assessment
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
[PCP]
[Essential] Planned
CM‐0101(OI), CM‐0103‐A(OI) [E], IS‐0102(OI)
‐
The ANSP has technical support for these tools including procedures which will be implemted with the new ATM system Project planned operational during 2020.
31/12/2021
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2021)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Technical support for these tools including procedures will be implemted with the new ATM system Project planned operational during 2020.
Future ATM System
Planned
31/12/2021
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 42 Release Issue
INF04
Implement integrated briefing
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012
Completed
IS‐0201(OI)
‐
Norway is at Level 4 ‐ the lack of integrated ATFM prevents to upgrade to Level 5. ‐
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2012)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Norway has implemented level 4. The lack of integrated ATFM prevents Norway to upgrade to level 5.
‐ Completed
‐
INF07
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (TOD)
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018
Planned
AIMS‐16(EN)
‐
National TOD policy is in the planning stages and dialog between NSA and stakeholders is ongoing. Where appropriate, changes to State legislation will be initiated to ensure timely implementation. Regulator's national plan/policy is expected to be finished in 2016 with a close dialogue between ASP and regulator.
31/05/2018
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:05/2018)
Luftfartstilsynet
The National TOD policy document is under production, but has not yet been finished. Dialog between NSA and stakeholders is ongoing.
‐ Planned
31/05/2018
ASP (By:05/2018)
AVINOR AS Waiting for national TOD policy to start detailed planning. ‐ Planned
31/05/2018
APO (By:05/2018)
Oslo Airport Airport operator at Oslo ‐ Gardermoen Airport will be part of the Avinor project plan for eTOD implementation. Also waiting for national policy.
‐ Planned
31/05/2018
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 43 Release Issue
ITY‐ACID
Aircraft identification
Timescales:
Entry into force of the Regulation: 13/12/2011 System capability: 02/01/2020 Possible deferred compliance, only for services provided by military units or under military supervision, subject to conditions:: 02/01/2025
Planned
GSURV‐0101(EN)
‐
ACID Reg. 1206/2011 was incorporated into Norwegian Law via the EEA agreement as of 1 Jan 2015. The ANSP has a NORWAM project with plans to implement a Nationwide WAM system in Norway by 2020.
02/01/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:01/2020)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
The NORWAM system plan to implement a Nationwide WAM system in Norway by 2020. All MSSR radars will in addition be operating in Mode S.
ARTAS Integration / Ekofisk ADS‐B Implementation / Future ATM System / Norwegian Radar, WAM, and ADS‐B Implementation Project
Planned
02/01/2020
ITY‐ADQ
Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information
Timescales:
Entry into force of the regulation: 16/02/2010 Article 5(4)(a), Article 5(4)(b) and Article 6 to 13 to be implemented by: 30/06/2013 Article 4, Article5(1) and Article 5(2), Article 5(3) and Article 5(4)(c) to be implemented by: 30/06/2014 All data requirements implemented by: 30/06/2017
Late
IS‐0202(OI), IS‐0204(OI)
‐
Work is in progress to ensure the quality of aeronautical data and information with objectives planned as "Late" throughout 2015‐2017.
31/07/2017
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:06/2017)
Luftfartstilsynet
Work is in progress to ensure the quality of aeronautical data and information with objectives planned as "Late" throughout 2015‐2017
‐ Late
31/07/2017
ASP (By:06/2017)
AVINOR AS New AIM system under implementation. ADQ‐implementation program
Planned
30/06/2017
APO (By:06/2017)
Oslo Airport Airport operator at Oslo ‐ Gardermoen Airport is integrated in the overall project plan in the Avinor Group.
‐ Late
31/07/2017
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 44 Release Issue
ITY‐AGDL
Initial ATC air‐ground data link services above FL‐285
Timescales:
ATS unit operational capability: 05/02/2018 Aircraft capability: 05/02/2020
Late
AUO‐0301(OI), CTE‐C02b(EN)
‐
Changes will be assessed when notified by the ANSP. The ANSP has communicated that data link implementation will be delayed until 2020. A new ATM system is planned to be operational in 2020 which will implement data link functionalities. Necessary VDL Mode 2 infrastructure will be implemented accordingly.
05/02/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: FI,LV]
REG (By:02/2018)
Luftfartstilsynet
Changes will be assessed when notified by the ANSP. The ANSP has communicated that data link implementation will be delayed until 2020. A new ATM system is planned to be operational in 2020 which will implement data link functionalities.
‐
Late
05/02/2020
ASP (By:02/2018)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
The new ATM system planned operational in 2020 will implement datalink functionalities. Necessary VDL Mode 2 infrastructure will be implemented accordingly.
Future ATM System
Late
30/06/2020
MIL (By:01/2019)
Mil. Authority MIL does not provide ATC services to civil flights ‐ Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 45 Release Issue
ITY‐AGVCS2
Implement 8,33 kHz air‐ground voice channel spacing below FL195
Timescales:
Entry into force: 07/12/2012 New and upgraded radio equipment: 17/11/2013 New or upgraded radios on State aircraft: 01/01/2014 Interim target for freq. conversions: 31/12/2014 All radio equipment: 31/12/2017 All frequencies converted: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those notified to EC: 31/12/2018 State aircraft equipped, except those exempted [Art 9(11)]: 31/12/2020
Planned
CTE‐C01a(EN)
‐
Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 as ammended by (EU) nr. 657/2013 has now been transposed into national regulation in Norway (BSL‐G 1‐2, § 2 nr. 4). This regulation does not apply to Svalbard. The NSA has formed a National Data Link working group in 2015 consisting of stakeholders and NSA to discuss a national implementation plan. The deliverables of the group should be available in 2016. Implementation date will be determined by the group and will be described in the National Plan.
31/12/2017
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:12/2018)
Luftfartstilsynet
Regulation (EU) No 1079/2012 has now been transposed into national regulation in Norway.
‐ Planned
31/12/2017
ASP (By:12/2018)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Voice Communication Systems are compliant and all transceivers can be converted into 8.33 kHz. ANSP awaiting conversion plan and activities as mandated by NSA.
‐ Planned
31/12/2017
MIL (By:12/2020)
Mil. Authority No plan developed for MIL related SLoAs at this time ‐ No Plan
‐
APO (By:12/2018)
Oslo Airport Voice Communication Systems are compliant and all transceivers can be converted into 8.33 kHz. APO awaiting conversion plan and activities as mandated by NSA.
‐ Planned
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 46 Release Issue
ITY‐COTR
Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes
Timescales:
Entry into force of Regulation: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of notification and initial coordination processes: 27/07/2006 For putting into service of EATMN systems in respect of Revision of Coordination, Abrogation of Coordination, Basic Flight Data and Change to Basic Flight Data: 01/01/2009 To all EATMN systems in operation by 12/2012: 31/12/2012 Systems serving ACCs providing services above FL285 in the airspace defined in Regulation (EU) 2015/310: 05/02/2018
Partly Completed
CM‐0201(OI)
‐
This applies to regulation 1032/2006 and most of the SLA's is implemented in the current ATM system (NATCON). ASP08 and ASP09 will be implemented in conjunction with implementation of CPDLC and the new ATM system planned operational in 2020.
30/06/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:02/2018)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
This applies to regulation 1032/2006 and most of the SLA's is implemented in the current ATM system (NATCON). ASP08 and ASP09 will be implemented in conjunction with implementation of CPDLC and the new ATM system planned operational in 2020.
Future ATM System
Partly Completed
30/06/2020
MIL (By:12/2012)
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐FMTP
Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP)
Timescales:
Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014
Completed
CTE‐C06(EN)
‐
ANSP plans implementation of FMTP in 2011, but the use of the protocol between ANSP and Controlling Military Units is considered not applicable, since no such units exist.
31/12/2014
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2014)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Implementation of FMTP is completed for Avinor ANS. Connection is established between Denmark and UK while connection to Sweden and Finland is pending.
‐ Completed
31/12/2014
MIL (By:12/2014)
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ Not Applicable
31/12/2014
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 47 Release Issue
ITY‐SPI
Surveillance performance and interoperability
Timescales:
Entry intro force of regulation: 13/12/2011 ATS unit operational capability: 12/12/2013 New aircraft capability: 08/06/2016 ELS in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/12/2017 EHS and ADS‐B Out in transport‐type State aircraft : 07/06/2020 Ensure training of MIL personnel: 07/06/2020 Retrofit aircraft capability: 07/06/2020
Partly Completed
GSURV‐0101(EN)
‐
Reg. 1207/2011 (SPI IR) was incorporated into Norwegian Law by National Regulation entering into force 15 July 2014.
07/06/2020
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:02/2015)
Luftfartstilsynet
From 1 Jan 2015, Reg. 1207/2011 was incorporated into Norwegian Law via the EEA agreement.
‐ Completed
01/01/2015
ASP (By:02/2015)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
All stakeholder lines of actions are implemented by Avinor.
ARTAS Integration / Norwegian Radar, WAM, and ADS‐B Implementation Project
Completed
05/02/2015
MIL (By:06/2020)
Mil. Authority No plans developed for MIL related SLoAs at this time. ‐ No Plan
‐
NAV03
Implementation of P‐RNAV
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
Completed
AOM‐0601(OI), AOM‐0602(OI), CTE‐N08(EN)
‐
P‐RNAV STARs are implemented in some TMAs, and P‐RNAV SIDs are planned for some TMAs. Most SLoA´s are completed.
31/12/2013
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
ASP (By:12/2023)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
P‐RNAV SID/STAR implemented in the Oslo AoR. P‐RNAV STAR implemented at Stavanger ‐ Sola and Bergen ‐ Flesland. Further deployment is planned in accordance with PBN Implementation Plan Norway.
‐
Completed
31/01/2012
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 48 Release Issue
NAV10
Implement APV procedures
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
Planned
AOM‐0602(OI), AOM‐0604(OI), CTE‐N06a(EN), CTE‐N06b(EN)
‐
Action is included as a part of PBN Implementation Plan Norway in accordance with Implementation roadmap (2013‐2016). In addition national regulations are amended with core requirements from PBN plan.
31/12/2016
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:04/2016)
Luftfartstilsynet
National implementation plan for PBN completed 2009. In addition national regulations are amended with core requirements from PBN plan
‐ Completed
30/04/2011
ASP (By:12/2016)
AVINOR AS Ref ASP04: AIP coordinates is presently published in EUREF89 (local implementation of WGS‐84) in accordance With annex 15. Will be in accordance With article 14 of 73/2010 by 07‐2018 (see also ITY‐ADQ).
‐ Late
31/07/2018
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Action is included as a part of PBN Implementation Plan Norway in accordance with Implementation roadmap (2013‐2016).
Performance Based Navigation
Planned
31/12/2016
SAF10
Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/06/2008 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
Completed
CM‐0801(OI)
‐
‐ 31/12/2012
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:12/2011)
Luftfartstilsynet
Ongoing consultation with stakeholders and a system is established to evalutate and implement new initiatives is in place
‐ Completed
31/12/2012
ASP (By:12/2011)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
Actions will be taken on the basis of the European Action Plan for Airspace Infringement risk reduction.
‐ Completed
31/12/2011
MIL (By:12/2011)
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ Not Applicable
31/12/2011
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 49 Release Issue
SAF11
Improve runway safety by preventing runway excursions
Timescales:
Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018
Planned
PRO‐006a(EN)
‐
The EAPRE is included in CAA‐N follow‐up of Safety Initiatives, but no work is formally yet started. 31/01/2018
[Objective coordinated with FAB partners: ‐]
REG (By:01/2018)
Luftfartstilsynet
The EAPRE is included in CAA‐N follow‐up of Safety Initiatives, but no work is formally yet started.
‐ Planned
31/01/2018
ASP (By:12/2014)
AVINOR Air Navigation Services
ASP Action Plan implemented ‐ Completed
31/12/2014
APO (By:12/2014)
Oslo Airport ASP Action Plan implemented ‐ Completed
31/12/2014
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 50 Release Issue
6.3 Alignment of PCP with ESSIP Objectives and related progress
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 51 Release Issue
Annexes
Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process
LSSIP Co-ordination
LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name
LSSIP Focal Point for Norway Luftfartstilsynet Rajunesh Shankar
LSSIP Focal Point for NSA/CAA Luftfartstilsynet Rajunesh Shankar
LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP Avinor ANS AS Bjørn Hovland
LSSIP Focal Point for Airport Avinor ANS AS Bjørn Hovland
LSSIP Focal Point for Military RNoAF Hans Jørgen Nordskog
EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support
Function Directorate Name
LSSIP Contact Person for Norway DPS/PEPR Luca Dell’Orto
ESSIP Objective Implementation
ESSIP Objective
EUROCONTROL Objective Owners
EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator
National Stakeholder Specialist(s)
AOM13.1 R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI, C. LUCCIOLI, E. REUBER
A. DYBOWSKA Morten Skogø
AOM19 G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI A. DYBOWSKA Lars Eriksen
AOM21.1 R. BUCUROIU
A. DYBOWSKA Torgeir Slotte
Hans Jacob Hofgaard
AOM21.2 R. BUCUROIU
A. DYBOWSKA Torgeir Slotte
Hans Jacob Hofgaard
AOP03 T. LICU P. VRANJKOVIC Espen Kurthi
AOP04.1 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Johan Steinkjer
AOP04.2 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Johan Steinkjer
AOP05 P. ADAMSON P. VRANJKOVIC Gro Jære
AOP10 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Johan Steinkjer
AOP11 M. BIRENHEIDE B. HILL Gro Jære
AOP12 M. BIRENHEIDE P. VRANJKOVIC Johan Steinkjer
ATC02.5 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Torgeir Slotte
ATC02.6 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Torgeir Slotte
ATC02.7 B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT Torgeir Slotte
ATC07.1 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Torgeir Slotte
ATC12.1 P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Torgeir Slotte
ATC15 P. CONROY, P. TERZIOSKI L. DELL’ORTO Torgeir Slotte
ATC16 S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL’ORTO Håvard Arne Mathlin
ATC17 S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO Torgeir Slotte
COM10 Y. EYUBOGLU A. KOKONA Erling Bergersen
COM11 L. POPESCU A. KOKONA Hugo Frivåg
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 52 Release Issue
ESSIP Objective
EUROCONTROL Objective Owners
EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator
National Stakeholder Specialist(s)
ENV01 C. FABER B. HILL Johan Steinkjer
ENV02 S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL Fredrik Nygaard
FCM01 H. KOOLEN O. CIOARA Torgeir Slotte
FCM03 TBD O. CIOARA Torgeir Slotte
FCM04 P. HOP O. CIOARA Lars Eriksen
FCM05 I. MENDES O. CIOARA Lars Eriksen
FCM06 P. HOP O. ALFARO Torgeir Slotte
INF04 P. MATERN A-P. FRANGOLHO Torgeir Slotte
INF07 A. PETROVSKY A-P. FRANGOLHO Torunn Carlsson
ITY-ACID A. DESMOND-KENNEDY O. CIOARA Kjetil Mosesen
ITY-ADQ M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO Torunn Carlsson
ITY-AGDL S. DISSING A. KOKONA Torgeir Slotte
ITY-AGVCS2 J POUZET O. ALFARO Hugo Frivåg
ITY-COTR S. MORTON L. DELL’ORTO Torgeir Slotte
ITY-FMTP L. POPESCU O. ALFARO Erling Bergersen
ITY-SPI M. BORELY, R. STEWART O. CIOARA Kjetil Mosesen
NAV03 F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA Hans Petter Kristoffersen
NAV10 R. FARNWORTH A. KOKONA Hans Petter Kristoffersen
SAF10 T. LICU I. FEIJT Anne Chavez
SAF11 S. LAWRENCE I. FEIJT Anne Chavez
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 53 Release Issue
Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts
CAA - Luftfartstilsynet - is under the responsibility of the MoTC. CAA Norway performs all functions of enforcement and control as delegated by the government body, in other words the responsibility for requirements and regulations, admission control and control of operators.
The CAA has been moved from Oslo to Bodø and is fully operational at the new location since 1.1.2007.
The following chart shows the structure in Luftfartstilsynet:
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 54 Release Issue
ANS Provider
The Norwegian provider of Civil ANS (Avinor ANS AS) is under the responsibility of the MoTC and is a state owned limited company fully owned by Avinor AS. Included in the ANS are the area control service offered to aircraft flying in Norway FIR and Bodø OFIR as well as approach and tower control service offered at 20 airports and Aerodrome FIS in 29 airports in Norway FIS is provided in all Norwegian FIR to VFR flights flying in a non-controlled area.
The following chart shows the structure of Avinor AS:
The following chart shows the Avinor Air Navigation Services AS in more detail:
Board ofDirectors
Division Regional Airports
Bergen Airport, Flesland
Stavanger Airport, Sola
Trondheim Airport, Værnes
Avinor Air NavigationServices AS
Oslo Lufthavn AS
Corporate Staff
CEO
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 55 Release Issue
Military Aviation Authority
The Chief of Staff of the RNoAF is the Military Aviation Authority. According to the Norwegian Aviation Act, the military is given the authority to issue rules and regulations for Military Aviation (BML).
The Military Aviation Authority is responsible for the education and certification of personnel (Pilots, Air Defence Controllers, Investigation Board Officers, Maintenance- and Ground Support Personnel).
Additionally, the Military Aviation Authority is responsible for the Military Aircraft Registry, for the certification of military aircraft and equipment and regulation of Military Airfields.
The following structure shows the Military Aviation Organisation:
LSSIP Year 2015 Norway 56 Release Issue
Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations
Specific abbreviations for Norway LSSIP
AAIB/N Aircraft Accident Investigation Board/Norway
AF ATM Functionality
BML Regulations for Military Aviation
BSL Regulations on Civil Aviation
CAA Civil Aviation Authority
FT Fast Track
PCP Pilot Common Project
PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme
MoTC Ministry of Transport and Communications
NATCON Norwegian Air Traffic Control System
NORAP The Norwegian Radar Programme
OSL Oslo Lufthavn AS (Airport)
PCP Pilot Common Project
RNoAF Royal Norwegian Air Force
S-AF Sub ATM Functionality
SNAB Strategic Nordic Military ATM Board
SNAP Southern Norway Airspace Project