“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy” 1 Bandwidth Driven Growth: Policy Essentials for Next...

Post on 18-Dec-2015

214 views 1 download

Transcript of “Leadership in Infrastructure Policy” 1 Bandwidth Driven Growth: Policy Essentials for Next...

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu1

Bandwidth Driven Growth: Policy Essentials for Next Generation Development

Mark A. Jamison, Ph.D.Director

Outline

• Overview of Internet and broadband development

• Impacts of broadband on economic development

• Policy requirements for broadband development

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu2

Overview of Internet and Broadband Development

• Distribution and development of the Internet

• Contrast Internet expansion with broadband

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu3

Population and Internet Distribution, 2007

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu4

World Population Proportions World Internet Proportions

Source: www.internetworldstats.com, 2008

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu5

Sources: www.internetworldstats.com, 2008www.ipligence.com/worldmap, 2008

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu6

Source: www.akamai.com, 2008

News site visits, 9 March 2008

Compelling news stories that caused peaks in past two years included sports (9), death/war (4), and politics (2).

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu7

Source: www.akamai.com, 2008

Music site visits, 9 March 2008

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu8

Source: www.akamai.com, 2008

Retail site visits, 9 March 2008

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu9

Source: www.akamai.com, 2008

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu10

Source: www.akamai.com, 2008

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu11

Source: www.internetworldstats.com, 2008

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu12

Source: www.internetworldstats.com, 2008

ObservationsOnly 12 countries make both lists

Those making both lists are• Asian (2)• European (8)• Islands (3)

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu13

Top 20 Internet Top 20 BroadbandAntigua & Barbuda

AustraliaBelgiumBermudaCanada

Denmark DenmarkFalkland Islands

Faroe Islands Faroe IslandsFinlandFrance

GreenlandHong Kong Hong Kong

Iceland IcelandJapan

Korea, South Korea, SouthLiechtenstein

Luxembourg LuxembourgMonaco

Netherlands NetherlandsNew Zealand

Norway NorwayPortugal

SingaporeSweden Sweden

Switzerland SwitzerlandTaiwan

United Kingdom United KingdomUnited States United States

Source: www.internetworldstats.com, 2008

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu14

Source: www.internetworldstats.com, 2008

OECD Growth in Broadband Connections

• OECD penetration rates: 2.9% in 2001 to 13.6% in 2005

• EU15: 1.6% to 14.2%

• Penetration highest in Scandinavian countries, South Korea, the Netherlands, and Switzerland

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu15

Falch, 2008

Non-OECD Broadband

• Broadband available in 166 countries by April 2006, twice as many as 4 years earlier

• Broadband tariffs reduced 40% past two years

• In Beijing, 50% connected to Internet and 64% of those use broadband

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu16

Falch, 2008

Summary of Internet and Broadband Development

• Developed nations dominate Internet, but developing countries in Asia are gaining

• Internet and broadband are not the same thing Many countries with extensive Internet do not

have much broadband, and visa versa Substitution effect

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu17

Economic Development

• Examine how ICT contributes to economic development

• Examine how broadband is different from general ICT

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu18

Economic Development

“The development and deployment of information technology is the foundation of the American growth resurgence.”

Dale Jorgenson, Harvard University (2001)Presidential address to the American Economic Association

19

Röller and Waverman (2001)

• Telecommunications development causes economic growth Telecommunications development caused

about one-third of OECD economic growth, 1971-1990

About US$1700 per person per year 10% improvement in per capita GDP

20

Röller and Waverman (2001)

• Reasons Adoption in one firm triggers adoption in

another Lower prices for consumers give additional

discretionary income• savings, investing, education, or other pursuits

• Benefits occur at nearly 100 percent penetration

21

Waverman, Meschi, and Fuss (2005)

• Mobile phone significantly impacts economic growth (1996-2003)

• Impact for developing countries twice that for developed countries

22

Waverman, Meschi, and Fuss (2005)

Success depends on “regulatory policies that favour competition and encourage the speediest possible rollout of mobile telephony.”

23

Effects of Advanced ICT in the U.K., 1984-1996

Sector

Lower Prices from

Advanced ICT

Productivity Increase from Advanced ICT

Electricity, gas and water supply 4.3% 45%

Transport 10.8% 50%

Financial 27.3% 486%

Telecommunications 56.0% 13%

Total economy 14.1% 111%

24

(Correa, 2006)

Economic Development

• Investment (largely IT) contributions to economic growth 1989-1995, four-fifths of the economic growth 1995-2000, three-fourths of economic growth 2000-2004, three-fifths of economic growth

Jorgenson and Vu (2005)

25

Summary on economic development

• Declining ICT prices drive economic development Increased investment in ICT Substitution of efficient ICT for outdated

technologies Development of new ICT-based skills

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu26

Relating ICT lessons to broadband

• What do we hang onto and what do we let go of?

• Roles of regulatory agencies Expert analyses Protect competition Provide incentives Limiting opportunism

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu27

Expert Analysis

• Data gathering and reporting

• Seminars and workshops

• Staff research

• Collaborations with universities and research institutes

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu28

Competition Improves Performance

• Waverman, Meschi, and Fuss (2005) Competition improves mobile penetration

• Gutiérrez (2003) Competition improves investment

• Wallsten (2004) Protecting incumbents hinders investment

29

Competition Improves Performance

• Competition improves broadband penetration Aron and Burnstein (2003) Denni and Gruber (2005)

30

Effects of Competition

• Improved efficiency

• Bailey (1986): Effects on AT&T Shed 6% of its work force Froze manager salaries Eliminated 35,000 positions

31

Market Power

• Market power and market stability Barriers to entry, such as limited licenses,

rights of way, and radio spectrum

• Denni and Gruber (2005) Resale launches broadband competition

32

Lee and Marcu (2007)

• Fixed broadband increased by Local loop unbundling Internet content Modem vs. DSL competition

• Mobile broadband increased by Standards competition

• Mobile and fixed do not compete (yet)

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu33

Property Rights Protection• Insulating investment from politics

• Cubbin and Stern (2006) both regulatory law and higher quality

regulatory governance are positively and significantly associated with higher per capita investment

• Lyons (2006) Commitment increases investment

34

Opportunism Limits Investment

• Gutiérrez (2003) “Sound regulatory governance in

telecommunications has a positive impact on network expansion and efficiency.”

• Cubbin and Stern (2006) Effective institutions essential to growth

35

Maiorano and Stern (2007)

• The establishment of a separate regulator, especially in developing countries, results in the long-run in about 11 percent higher mobile penetration.

36

Independent Agency

• Regulation under the law, independence, transparency, predict-ability, legitimacy, and credibility

• Henisz and Zelner (2001) Checks on executive discretion enhance rate

of telecommunications deployment

37

Henisz and Zelner (2001)

• “the level of institutional support for private property rights in Thailand and the Philippines (was) considerably greater than that in Malaysia and Indonesia.”

• “Investors in Thailand and the Philippines fared considerably better than did investors in Malaysia and Indonesia.”

38

Demand factors

• Digital divide in U.S. greater in computers than in broadband (Stanton, 2005) Education; e-government

• Later adopters more influenced by social factors than are early adopters (Rogers, 2003) Industry marketing

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu39

Demand factors• Bundling and pricing options slow adoption.

So does desire to wait for next technology. (Adams, 2008) Industry marketing and research

• Multiple firm locations and presence of young and skilled workforce makes. (Colombo et al., 2008) Macro conditions for business

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu40

Relating ICT lessons to broadband

“It is precisely because change is constant that our foundations must be strong.”

Peter Drucker

“Leadership in Infrastructure Policy”

www.purc.ufl.edu41