Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009.

Post on 04-Jan-2016

226 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009.

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

Who?› Getting to know me› Getting to know you

Why?› Tutorial Objectives.› Project Objectives.

What?› Software requirements.

How?› Tutorial sessions› Project work

Teams

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

Why?

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

Direct application for the SW engineering activities.

Discuss real software development case studies.

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

Prepare the students’ for their graduation project.

Improve the students’ skills in project documentation.

Enhance the teamwork objectives and skills between the students.

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

What?

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

MS Project 2007. MS Office Visio 2007.

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

How?

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

General topicsProject

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

Team work of (7) members . Each team should collaboratively work

to produce a complete software system with the documentation.

Team members will be graded on their individual effort within their specific role (see below), as well as the efforts they put in reviewing their peers work.

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

In shared phases : Proposal , testing , final document

All the team’s members work. o Non- shared phases:

• software requirements specification, Design , implementation.

• Up to 3 member as main participant and rest of the team as reviewer

Coordinator

Analysts

Designers

Programmers

Testers

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

RolesResponsibilities

Analyst

•Collects the requirements from the client•Structures the requirements into an SRS document•Develops any system models required (STD, SEQ, ER diagrams, Data Dictionary, etc)•Submits the SRS document for review by the SQA (Software Quality Assurance) team.

Designer

•Develops the design of the system which includes•Architectural design•Data design (Schema and data structures)•Component design (flowcharts or pseudo code)•Interface design (screens + error messages)•Submits the design document for review by other the SQA (Software Quality Assurance) team.

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

RolesResponsibilities

Programmer

•Using the documentation developed from the previous phases, the programmer should:•Write the program code•Perform unit testing•Perform integration testing (this is usually performed by the testing team, but because our system is small it is better to have the programmer do it)•Submit the implementation (source code) for review by the SQA (Software Quality Assurance) team.

Tester

ALL THE TEAM

•Using the SRS, the tester should develop•A Test plan (can be done once the SRS is ready)•Test cases•They should perform system testing and produce•Test Report•Submit the Test Report for review by the SQA (Software Quality Assurance) team.

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

RolesResponsibilities

Coordinator

•Make sure that all members perform their tasks and submit on time.•Negotiate any differences and report immediately to the TA any team problems, so that they can be solved as early as possible and not left to the end of the term.•Collect and submit the report produced by each phase to the TA.•Ensure that updates are made to the report after review by the TA.•Collects and combines all the parts of the project•Writes the introduction and the conclusion for the report•Submits the final project documentation for review by the SQA (Software Quality Assurance) team.

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

CoordinatorMonitor the work

Member Role(analyst/designer/

programmer/tester)

Document (v.1) SQA

Reviewed Document (v.2)

Corrected Document with comments TeacherSQA

Apply the comments from teacher

Document (v.3)

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

Review and evaluate the first version of the document.

Show the good and poor points in the document. As illustrated in the table below:

In shared phases you should write who did what

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

Reviewer name

Comment type

Page number

SectionDescription

Latifa AlAbdlkarim lalabdulkarim@ksu.edu.sa King Saud University October,2009

Document75 %

reviews=25 %