Integrating Live and Online Activities: An innovative approach to Continuing Education (CE)

Post on 24-Feb-2016

22 views 0 download

description

Integrating Live and Online Activities: An innovative approach to Continuing Education (CE). James C. Norton, PhD Seth Anderson, BS Maggie Luoma, BS. Overview. About CECentral Rationale Family Medicine Review Methods Results Discussion. UKHC CECentral. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Integrating Live and Online Activities: An innovative approach to Continuing Education (CE)

An Equal Opportunity University

Integrating Live and Online Activities: An innovative approach to Continuing Education

(CE)James C. Norton, PhD

Seth Anderson, BSMaggie Luoma, BS

An Equal Opportunity University

Overview

• About CECentral• Rationale• Family Medicine Review• Methods• Results• Discussion

An Equal Opportunity University

UKHC CECentral

• Administrative unit within UKHC• Accreditation for Pharmacy and Medicine• Live and Online content• 600 activities last year

An Equal Opportunity University

Rationale I

• Adult learning literature suggests limited retention of lecture content

• Regarding CE, traditional lecture format has limited role in helping physicians assimilate new information (Bloom, 2005)

• Literature suggests that active learning is more effective

An Equal Opportunity University

Rationale II

• Live events should be interactive• Interaction is easier if basic knowledge is

already shared• Online prerequisites for live events allow that• Natural fit for CECentral

An Equal Opportunity University

Family Medicine Review

• Family Medicine Review: a traditional live event lasting a week

• Lecture format• Innovation: Provide online prerequisites for

case based, small group evening seminars• Eight sessions to date, discussing the first four

An Equal Opportunity University

Methods I

• 2011 session of FMR: three existing online activities identified as prerequisites– Nephrology– Over the counter drugs– ADHD/ADD

• FMR registrants recruited

An Equal Opportunity University

Methods II

• Participants limited to 12 per session• Sessions in evening • Faculty facilitated case discussions• Participants encouraged to bring cases• Faculty had cases as back-up

An Equal Opportunity University

Results I

• Significant difference between mean evaluation scores of OTC course when compared to the two other topics, Nephro and ADD.

• Significant difference between the mean first attempt scores between two topics, Nephrology and OTC.

An Equal Opportunity University

Results II

An Equal Opportunity University

Results III

• 4+ ratings on 5 point scale• “Outstanding forum/discussion which clarified

many nephrology issues for me in treating my renal patients … Keep this session available to others.”

• “The webinars were good, but what really, “made,” this course was Dr. Sawaya, who made sure we understood the material.”

An Equal Opportunity University

Discussion I

• Long day for participants• Difficult to assure prerequisites completed• Participants rarely brought cases

An Equal Opportunity University

Discussion II

• FMR: making seminars a regular element• Considering alternative time• Plan to expand format to other live meetings

An Equal Opportunity University