Transcript of Indications for Treatment and Outcomes Evaluation for the Orthotic Management of Idiopathic...
- Slide 1
- Indications for Treatment and Outcomes Evaluation for the
Orthotic Management of Idiopathic Scoliosis Thomas M. Gavin, C.O.
BioConcepts, inc. Burr Ridge, Illinois, USA Musculoskeletal
Biomechanics Laboratory. Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines,
Illinois, USA Thomas M. Gavin, C.O. BioConcepts, inc. Burr Ridge,
Illinois, USA Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Laboratory. Veterans
Administration Hospital, Hines, Illinois, USA AOPA Seattle
2009
- Slide 2
- Timothy J. Newton, C.O. January 4 th 1949-September 13 th
2009
- Slide 3
- SRS Definition of Terms ACCEPTEDNOMENCLATURE FOR SPINAL RELATED
CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES RELATED TO SPINAL DEFORMITIES.
ACCEPTEDNOMENCLATURE FOR SPINAL RELATED CONDITIONS AND PROCEDURES
RELATED TO SPINAL DEFORMITIES.
- Slide 4
- IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS
- Slide 5
- ORTHOTIC TREATMENT FOR IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS n Why use an
orthosis? n When do we use an orthosis? n How does an orthosis
work? n How long should it be worn? n Which orthosis should I use?
n Is part-time treatment effective? n What is the chance of still
needing surgery after orthotic management? n Why use an orthosis? n
When do we use an orthosis? n How does an orthosis work? n How long
should it be worn? n Which orthosis should I use? n Is part-time
treatment effective? n What is the chance of still needing surgery
after orthotic management?
- Slide 6
- CURVE PATTERNS AND MEASUREMENTS
- Slide 7
- Slide 8
- Left Lumbar Curve King Type I
- Slide 9
- Right Thoracic Primary Left Lumbar Compensatory Curves. King
Type II
- Slide 10
- KingRight Thoracic Curve King Type III
- Slide 11
- Thoracolumbar Curve King Type IV
- Slide 12
- Cobb Angle 51
- Slide 13
- ABCDE A. 0 Rotation. Neutral. No Rotation. B. +1 Rotation.
Pedicle Towards Midline. Concave Direction. C. +2 Rotation. Pedicle
2/3 to Midline. D. +3 Rotation. Pedicle at Midline. E. +4 Rotation.
Pedicle Beyond Midline. A. 0 Rotation. Neutral. No Rotation. B. +1
Rotation. Pedicle Towards Midline. Concave Direction. C. +2
Rotation. Pedicle 2/3 to Midline. D. +3 Rotation. Pedicle at
Midline. E. +4 Rotation. Pedicle Beyond Midline. Vertebral
Rotation.
- Slide 14
- Maturation and Development n Vertebral Ring Apophyses. n Line
of Risser. n Development of Secondary Sex Characteristics. n
Menarche. n Growth Velocity. n Vertebral Ring Apophyses. n Line of
Risser. n Development of Secondary Sex Characteristics. n Menarche.
n Growth Velocity.
- Slide 15
- VERTEBRALRING APOPHYSES
- Slide 16
- A BC A. Ring Apophysis Begins To Form. B. Ossification
Complete, Not United With Body. C. Ossified and United With Body.
Mature.
- Slide 17
- RISSER SIGN
- Slide 18
- Risser 1 = 25% Capping. Risser 2 = 50% Capping. Risser 3 = 75%
Capping. Risser 4 = 100% Capping. Risser 5 = 100% Capping + Fusion.
Line Of Risser
- Slide 19
- Slide 20
- Slide 21
- Slide 22
- TANNER SIGNS
- Slide 23
- 5 Stages of Breast and Pubic Hair Development
- Slide 24
- 5 Stages of Genitalia and Pubic Hair Development
- Slide 25
- Slide 26
- Slide 27
- Slide 28
- Slide 29
- MATURITY AT ORTHOSIS INITIATION AFFECTS OUTCOMES
- Slide 30
- From Bunch and Patwardhan: Scoliosis; Making Clinical
Decisions. CV Mosby Company, 1989 Bracing initiated at 6- 18 months
Premenarchal
- Slide 31
- From Bunch and Patwardhan: Scoliosis; Making Clinical
Decisions. CV Mosby Company, 1989 Bracing Initiated 6 Months
Premenarchal to 6 Months Post Menarche
- Slide 32
- From Bunch and Patwardhan: Scoliosis; Making Clinical
Decisions. CV Mosby Company, 1989 Bracing Initiated 6-18 Months
Post-Menarche
- Slide 33
- Determining Clinical Curve Stiffness. n Side Bending Correction
of Each Curve. n Expressed As % Correction From Normal. n %
Correction Thoracic: % Correction Lumbar = Flexibility Index As
Reported by King Et Al. n Side Bending Correction of Each Curve. n
Expressed As % Correction From Normal. n % Correction Thoracic: %
Correction Lumbar = Flexibility Index As Reported by King Et
Al.
- Slide 34
- A. B.C. A. Normal Coronal Alignment. B. Right Side Bending.
Primary Thoracic Curve Resists Corrective Forces. C. Left Side
Bending. Compensatory Lumbar Curve Corrects To Nearly 0. A. Normal
Coronal Alignment. B. Right Side Bending. Primary Thoracic Curve
Resists Corrective Forces. C. Left Side Bending. Compensatory
Lumbar Curve Corrects To Nearly 0.
- Slide 35
- Biological Changes in Bone Morphology Epiphyseal Growth Is
Slowed When Epiphyses Are Compressed. (Hueter-volkman Principle)
Epiphyseal Growth Is Slowed When Epiphyses Are Compressed.
(Hueter-volkman Principle)
- Slide 36
- HUETER-VOLKMAN WEDGING. WEDGING. Concave Side Epiphysis
Develops at a Slower Rate Than Convex Side Due to Compression.
HUETER-VOLKMAN WEDGING. WEDGING. Concave Side Epiphysis Develops at
a Slower Rate Than Convex Side Due to Compression.
- Slide 37
- Clinical Evaluation and Mechanism of Action n Orthoses must be
designed and fitted to: u Reduce Curve Maximally. u Reduce Any
Decompensation. u Be Easily Adjusted. u Keep Constant Force On
Curves. u Be As Comfortable As Possible.
- Slide 38
- Slide 39
- Slide 40
- Slide 41
- Slide 42
- NATURAL HISTORY: RISK OF CURVE PROGRESSION.
- Slide 43
- CURVE PROGRESSION n Age. u Older Children Are Less Likely to
Progress at Curve Magnitudes That Are Progressive in Younger
Children. n Magnitude. u Larger Curves Are More Unstable Than
Smaller. n Curve Pattern. u Thoracic and Double Primary Curves
Progress Less Than Single Lumbar or Thoracolumbar Curves. n Age. u
Older Children Are Less Likely to Progress at Curve Magnitudes That
Are Progressive in Younger Children. n Magnitude. u Larger Curves
Are More Unstable Than Smaller. n Curve Pattern. u Thoracic and
Double Primary Curves Progress Less Than Single Lumbar or
Thoracolumbar Curves.
- Slide 44
- Risk of Progression by Risser Sign. Lonstein and Carlson 1984
JBJS
- Slide 45
- Risk of Progression by Chronological Age. Lonstein and Carlson
1984 JBJS
- Slide 46
- LONG-TERM CURVE PROGRESSION. (Avg. F/U 40 Years Post Diagnosis)
From Weinstein et. al. 1984 JBJS
- Slide 47
- Weinstein Zavala and Ponsetti 1984 JBJS n 68% progressed > 5
degrees. n 37% progressed in last 10 years. (avg. F/U 40 years post
diagnosis.) n 68% progressed > 5 degrees. n 37% progressed in
last 10 years. (avg. F/U 40 years post diagnosis.)
- Slide 48
- TREATMENT OUTCOME EXPECTATIONS.
- Slide 49
- Moe and Kettleson. 1970 JBJS n 169 Patients Treated With
Milwaukee Brace. n 23% Average Correction of Thoracic Curves
Post-treatment. n 18% Average Correction of Lumbar and
Thoracolumbar Curves Post- treatment. n Short Term Results. n 169
Patients Treated With Milwaukee Brace. n 23% Average Correction of
Thoracic Curves Post-treatment. n 18% Average Correction of Lumbar
and Thoracolumbar Curves Post- treatment. n Short Term
Results.
- Slide 50
- Carr et. al. JBJS 1980 n Re-Reviewed Moes Patients From 1970. n
Reported on Late Losses of Correction. n Showed Late Losses of
Correction. n Results Showed Residual Curves Still Less Than
Pre-orthosis Magnitude. n Re-Reviewed Moes Patients From 1970. n
Reported on Late Losses of Correction. n Showed Late Losses of
Correction. n Results Showed Residual Curves Still Less Than
Pre-orthosis Magnitude.
- Slide 51
- Residual Curve 5-Years Post-Treatment By Menarche Value at
Initiation Of Orthosis. Bunch and Patwardhan, Chapter 13,
Scoliosis; Making Clinical Decisions. 1989.
- Slide 52
- Surgical Rates Following Orthotic Treatment Based on Initial
Risser Sign. From: Milwaukee Brace Treatment Of Ais. Lonstein and
Winter. JBJS 1994
- Slide 53
- Bunch Reported Best Curve Reduction for Youngest Group and
Lonstein Reported Highest Surgical Rates for Youngest Group?
- Slide 54
- Orthotic Outomes; Failure Boundary
- Slide 55
- PART-TIME VERSUS FULL-TIME
- Slide 56
- A META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY OF NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT FOR
IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS. Rowe et al. - J Bone and Joint Surgery [Am].
79-A (5) 664-674, 1997.)
- Slide 57
- A Comparison Between The Boston Brace And The Charleston
Bending Brace In Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. Katz DE, Richards
S, Browne RH, Herring JA. Spine, 22(12); 1302-1312,1997.
- Slide 58
- Primary Goals. n Correct Curves >50%. n Maintain Correction
Throughout Duration of Wear. n Address Psycho-social Issues. n
Fulltime Until Proven Otherwise. n Maximal Comfort. n Minimal
Structure. n Correct Curves >50%. n Maintain Correction
Throughout Duration of Wear. n Address Psycho-social Issues. n
Fulltime Until Proven Otherwise. n Maximal Comfort. n Minimal
Structure.
- Slide 59
- SummarySummary n Orthoses Must Improve Stability To Yield
Optimal Outcome! Optimizing Orthotic Treatment Requires; 1. Proper
Patient Selection (Age, Magnitude, Documented Progression). 2.
Utilization of All Mechanisms of Action to Improve Stability. 3.
Frequent Follow-Up Adjustments To Restore Orthosis to Optimal Fit
and Function. 3. Frequent Follow-Up Adjustments To Restore Orthosis
to Optimal Fit and Function. 4. Sound Clinical Procedures! 4. Sound
Clinical Procedures! n Orthoses Must Improve Stability To Yield
Optimal Outcome! Optimizing Orthotic Treatment Requires; 1. Proper
Patient Selection (Age, Magnitude, Documented Progression). 2.
Utilization of All Mechanisms of Action to Improve Stability. 3.
Frequent Follow-Up Adjustments To Restore Orthosis to Optimal Fit
and Function. 3. Frequent Follow-Up Adjustments To Restore Orthosis
to Optimal Fit and Function. 4. Sound Clinical Procedures! 4. Sound
Clinical Procedures!
- Slide 60
- n In-Orthosis Correction of the Curve Should Always Exceed 50%
n Orthosis Should NOT Increase Decompensation. n When Curve Appears
to Progress From Best In Brace Magnitude, Orthosis Should Be
Adjusted To Restore Curve Reduction. n Weaning Should Be Gradual!
SummarySummary
- Slide 61
- Thank You For Your Attention! www.orthotic.com