Post on 31-Dec-2015
description
Health and Safety Conference 2011
Evaluation Results
February 2011
Summary of Evaluation Results
87 attendees (72 delegates,15 Health and Safety Dept)
49/72 delegates provided post-conference evaluation (68%)
Overall Assessment of Conference
Delegates’ Comments
This was very helpful and the half day very useful (long enough). Informative + enjoyable. I picked up a few helpful nuggets of info during the day. Thanks
for organising. More regular H&S conferences like this. Ensure proper use of microphones by all! (Not all speakers have
voices that carry).
Conference Usefulness
Please indicate how useful you found the Conference
Conference Usefullness6%
47%
47%
Very useful Useful Not at all useful
Future Events
If the event were repeated, for example with a topic based conference, would you be likely to attend?
Conference re-attendance
92%
6% 2%
Yes No Undecided
Suggestions for H&S topics for future events
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Comm
unicat
ion
COSHH
Stress
DSE
Biosaf
ety
Stats
/ Auditi
ng
Train
ing
Risk A
ssess
men
ts
Wast
e M
anagem
ent
Contracto
rs
MOBUG
Occ
upatio
nal H
ealth
Fire
Radia
tion
Nu
mb
er
of
Re
sp
on
de
nts
Topics
It would be interesting to hear about trends in accidents / near misses that are reported to CMG.
A smaller forum of more specific area – e.g. Biological lab safety. H&S reporting and recording to remain compliant with UoE and
statutory regulations. Discussion groups on H&S topics to share good practice. Stress risk assessment. Disabled access (PEEP) Chemicals, COSHH and risk assessments AON audits
Comments
I think Lesley Yellowlees (Academics) should be involved in PI training.
Too laboratory / chemical specific. A smaller forum of more specific area – e.g. Biological lab safety. Enjoyed Joe Brannigan’s (Estates & Buildings) talk and safety
advisors – low risk elements. Enjoyed hearing from other H&S people and how it is managed in
other areas of the University. Speakers not at all engaging.