HCPSS End-of-Year Teacher Evaluation Process

April Leadership I

Outcomes – Participants will…• Use the 2013 Charlotte Danielson Framework

for Teaching to identify criteria for high-quality artifacts.

• Affirm criteria for determining insufficient, partial, or full attainment of Student Learning Objectives.

• Understand the year-end evaluation process

• Become aware of resources that support the the final evaluation process.

Agenda

• Idea Exchange

• Artifact Analysis

• Evaluation Summary Report

• End-of-Year Conference process

• Supports and Resources

Idea Exchange

• Form standing groups of 3-4.

• Discuss practices and supports you have put in place to facilitate the evaluation process.

Artifact Analysis

• Review the sample artifact.

• Refer to the rubric for 4C: Communicating with Families.

• Work with your table group to determine a level of performance.

• Use the language of the rubric to justify your decision.

Process Guide pgs. 18-21

Artifacts•Teachers must upload at least 1 artifact per component in domains 1 and 4.

•A single artifact can be used as evidence for more than one component.

Rating SLOs

Review the student data for the SLO target.

Determine the level of attainment.

Rating SLOs

Click the appropriate level of performance in Teachscape within: External Measures – SLOs.

Overall Score—out of 12 Points10 – 12 points = Highly Effective

7 – 9.99 points = Effective3.5 – 6.99 = Ineffective

Professional Practice—

6 points possible

• Planning and Preparation

• Classroom Environment

• Instruction

• Professional Responsibilities

Student Growth—

6 points possible

• SLO 1

• SLO 2

Professional Practice Contribution

Numerical Values• Unsatisfactory = 1

• Basic = 2

• Proficient = 3

• Distinguished = 4

Professional Practice Average 3.32

Professional Practice Contribution to Overall Score

4.98

Domain Score

Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

3.5

Domain 2: Classroom Environment

2.8

Domain 3: Instruction 3.3

Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities

3.67

Student Growth Contribution

Numerical Values• Insufficient

Attainment = 1

• Partial Attainment = 2

• Full Attainment = 3

SLO 1 2

SLO 2 3

Student Growth Average 2.5

Student Growth Contribution 5

Overall Score—out of 12 Points10 – 12 points = Highly Effective

7 – 9.99 points = Effective3.5 – 6.99 = Ineffective

Professional Practice—

6 points possible

• Planning and Preparation

• Classroom Environment

• Instruction

• Professional Responsibilities

Student Growth—

6 points possible

• SLO 1

• SLO 2

Areas of Evaluation Score

Professional Practice 4.98

Student Growth 5

Overall Score 9.98

End-of-Year Conferences

• Read about the HCPSS Year-End Evaluation Process.

• As you read place a:

√ check mark beside something you already knew

? question mark beside something you are wondering about

* star by something that resonates with you.

Teacher Signature Sign Off Required

Principal Signature Sign Off Required

For Administrators

Supports

• One-on-one support from your POD contact

• Support from Admin Directors

• Webinars on request

• Other ideas?

Resources

• Evaluation resources on the School Administration HUB

• Resources on the Teacher Evaluation wiki

For Teachers

Supports

• POD contact support for TDLs

• “Office hours”

• Webinars on request

Resources

• Evaluation wiki & FAQ

• Artifact Module (TDLs)

• Sub for TDLs

• Workshop wages for teachers

• Screencast: Evaluation Summary Report

Teacher Evaluation Summary Report

HCPSS End-of-Year Teacher Evaluation Process

April Leadership I