Post on 24-May-2020
HBO Historical Evaluation & Research Organization
75 7
16
Report Number 129-
COMBAT HISTORY ANALYSIS STUDY EFFORT (CHASE)
DATA ENHANCEMENT STUDY (CDES)
I <
<
Vol V: Tasks 6, 1, 8, and 9
Final Report 31 January 1986
Prepared for the
\_
US Army Concepts Analysis Agency
Bethesda, Maryland
i Contract No. MDA903-85-C-0252
■■■.... >
.- ^rrd ^k JAN 7 1937 ,| i
A
12F
8316 ARLINGTON BOULEVARD - SUITE 400 - FAIRFAX, VA 22031 (703) 560-6427
Report Number 129
COMBAT HISTORY ANALYSIS STUDY EFFORT (CHASE)
DATA ENHANCEMENT STUDY (CDES) Vol. V: Tasks 6, 1, 8f and 9
Final Report
Brian Bader John R. Brinkerhoff Trevor N. Dupuy C.C. Johnson
Charles R. Smith
31 January 1986
Prepared for
US Army Concepts Analysis Agency
Bethesda, Maryland
Contract No. MDA903-85-C-0252
Data,Memory Systems, Inc. 8316 Arlington Blvd.
Fairfax, Virginia 22031
Table of Contents i
V-5>Task 61 -
f r>Task 6i - Clarification of the Defender Posture Description
Task ?/- Identification of the Quality of Strength and Loss Dataj 22
Task 8/- Development of Strength and Attrition Histories for Selected Battles ' a^J* 126
Task 9i - Assistance in Eliminating Unwanted Redundancies , 130
Task 6: Clarification of the Defender Posture Description
The purpose of this task is to identify the engagements in
which the defender's posture consists of two of the five basic
posture levels used in the data base (i.e., fortified, prepared,
hasty, delay, and withdrawal) and to indicate whether the posture
levels are a combination or an average. For a definition of
posture and its five basic levels, see pages 7-9 of Volume II of
the original data base.
1. A combination defensive posture is one in which two
fully developed posture levels occur in two or more sectors
across the front of a defensive position or in two or more lines
of defense through the depth of a defensive position. A
combination defensive posture may also occur, frequently in
engagements of prolonged duration, when two fully developed
posture levels occur at different times during the course of the
engagement. An "x" under column heading 1^ indicates that the
posture is a combination, and an "x" under the column heading
Front, Width, or Time shows whether the combination posture is
over the front or throughout the depth of a defensive position or
over time.
2. An average defensive posture is one which has
features of two types of posture but does not contain all the
characteristics inheren,t to a single posture type. An "x" under
column heading 2 indicates that the posture is an average. It
has been determined that in average posture descriptors, the two
levels of posture are generally uniformly mixed. Therefore,
average posture descriptors are not enhanced by entries under the
column headings for across the front, through depth, or over time.
Review of posture descriptors for this task has resulted in
the reevaluation of postures for six engagements. They are:
White Mountain, #2, changes from PD to H/PD.
Dunbar, #27, changes from H/PD to HD.
Solferino, #168, changes from H/PD to HD.
Sadowa (Koeniggraetz), #169, charges from H/PD to HD.
Custozza II, #170, changes from H/PD to HD.
Adabiya, #582, changes from H/PD to WDL.
Users of the data base should make the above changes in
Table 2 of the original data base.
Explanations of the column headings for the Task 6 tables
are as follow.
POST D1/P0ST D2 are the postures entered in Table 2 of
the original data base.
Descriptor indicates either a combination or average
of two posture levels, column heading 1^ being the former and
column heading 2 the latter as described above.
Defensive Posture Changes are the types of changes in a
combination posture descriptor, either Front, Depth, or Time, as
described above.
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
White Mountain, #2
1 l ""l 1 III 1
I iDescriptor jDefensive Posture Changes I ! 1 1 - 1 IPOST D1/| | | | | | IPOST 02 I 1|2| Front 1 Depth 1 Time 1 1 11! 1 ! 1 1 III 1 1 1 1 H/PD 1 x | 1 x I 1 | 1 III 1 I 1
Newbury II, #24
H/PD i x
Worcester, #28
H/PD
St. Antoine, #29
j H/PD X X x i i i i
Vienna, #32
1 H/PD T^
X I-'
x x j |
Enzheim, #36
iH/PD
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Aughrim, #44
1 1 1 ' ' ' 1 1 1
I iDescriptor iDefensive Posture Changes III IPOST D1/| | | 1 I I POST D2 I \ \ 2 \ Front I Depth | Time
| H/PD 1 x j | x | x j
Steenkerke, #45
H/PD
Neerwinden (Landen), #46
Ramillies, #51
H/PD I x
Fontenoy, #58
| H/PD X „-■ ■
X
■ • ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ .j ■ ■ ■ ■ •— ,
, #74
i i
i H/PD i i
I X X
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Bunker Hill, #82
1 ! i | iDescriptor iDefensive Posture Changes iii i i. i
IPOST D1/| I I | | iPOST D2 i 112 1 Front 1 Dppth I Time
1 1 1 " ! " 1 1 1 III 1 1
1 H/PD j X j j x | j
Eutaw Springs,. #95
H/PD
Arcola, #106
H/PD 1 1 1 1 1
X
Rivoli, #107
H/PD ! x ■
i
i i
! 1
1 X
1 1 1 • ■■ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Pyramids, #108
H/PD
Zurich, #111
i P/FD
Zurich III, #113
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
I POST D1/ I POST D2
"! 1 i i
iDescriptor iDefensive Posture Changes I
P/FD
Bussaco, #129
H/PD
Borodino, #134
H/PD
Bautzen, #136
H/PD I X
Dresden, #137
La Rothiere, #140
1 1 ■ ■ '
i H/PD ! 1 1 1 1
i 1 1 x ! 1 I
i i 1
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Waterloo, #145
1 1 1
| jDescriptor iDefensive Posture Changes i i i i '. ... —.. '
IPOST D1/| j | | | IPOST D2 I 1 I 2 I Front 1 Depth I Time 1 II! 1 1 1 III 1 1
1 ill I 1 1 H/PD 1 X i 1 X 1 i i ill i i i _ i I i i i
The Alma, #165
H/PD x
Front Royal, #179
H/WDL
Chattanooga, #201
P/FD x
Spotsylvania, #203
;H/PD
Peachtree Creek, #207
• H/PD
\ AJ i -v. t "w » *~J i ■_ i ^_ i -i._ t »L. i m-/i MJ~I »*. -
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Opequon Creek (Third Winchester), #211
I I POST Dl/ I POST D2
H/PD
Descriptor iDefensive Posture Changes
1 I 1 Front I Depth 1 Time i t • i i i
! I ! • x i x i x
Dinwiddie Court House & White Oak Road, #216
| H/PD X 1 ' 1 1
T 1 X
1 1 1 1 1
1
1 1
Spichern, #222
Majuba Hillr #232
H/PD
Telissu, #243
H/PD
Liaoyang, #244
jP/FD 1 x i ; i i
i i
t x 1 x
8
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
The Sha-Ho, «245
1 ' . . . .
POST D1/| r^ POST D2 I 1 1 2
t i i i
H/PD | X j
. . i i
I Front Depth ! Time
iDescriptor [Defensive Posture Changes |
Mukden, #247
P/FD
Lule' Burgas, #249
H/PD x
Prelip, #250
P/FD
Monastir, #251
The Nieman, #254
i H/PD |
1 r i i
1 x I
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Hill 52/Shachaofeng# #257
I 1 1 I iDescriptor jDefensive Posture Changes 11,1 IPOST D1/I I ', i | IPOST D2 i 1 I 2 i Front 1 Depth I Time i iii i i i • i i i . i t 1 " | — II.«III • i—»i - j i
1 III 1 1
1 H/PD 1 1 x 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i
Alsace-Lorraine I, #262
Del/FD
Alsace-Lorraine II, #263
H/FD
Le Cateau, #267
HD/WDL
The Aisne, #277
Ctesiphon, #303
i F/PD i i
1 x
—i—■ ■ i
1 x 1
1 x 1 1
10
i ■> .■ m i M -^ K n ■ jn a n m.ntAj% » -i * i m_rt M.J
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Asiago, #313
1 i '1" 1 1 1
I iDescriptor iDefensive Posture Changes 1 ! IPOST Dl/I | i i I IPOST D2 1 1 I 2 | Front i Depth 1 Time
III 1 1 1 H/PD 1 x 1 ' 1 x 1
III 1 i
Second Somme, Phase II (Somme-Montdidier), #331
F/PD
Belleau Wood, #336
Aisne-Marne II, #359
FD/Del | x
St. Mihiel, #364
FD/Del X
i
i i i
i
1 x 1 1 x
Lahayville-Bois de Lamarche, #365
11
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Meuse-Argonne, Phase III, #381
1 1 I jDescriptor iDefensive Posture Changes
IPOST D1/i | | | 1 IPOST D2 1 1|2| Front I Depth i Time i iii i i
" ' ' ' ' , , '. - 1 III I i I PD/Del " i x ' | j
Remilly-Aillicourt, #382
PD/Del
Hill 252-Pont Maugis, #383
PD/Del
1 ■ i i
x l
Alam Haifa, #386
P/FD
Amphitheater, #394
H/PD I x i ,
Port of Salerno, #395
i H/PD i i
12
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Sele-Calore Corridor, #396
1 1
Descript 1
or Defensive Posture Changes
IPOST D1/ IPOST D2 i i
1 1 I 1 1 i i
2 Front I Depth i
1 Time i
i
• H/PD
1
1 1 1
1 1 X
1
i i
1 i i
Monte Camino II, #418
| H/PD j i i i i
1 ! i i
i X j
1 1
1 1
Factory Counterattack, #430
• FD/PD j 1 1 ! x j i
'■ i ' ■ i . i
i i i
i ' 1 1 II 1 1 1
Bowling Alley, #431
Moletta River II, #432
FD/PD
Valmontone, #455
H/PD IX
13
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Sellle-Nied, #470
III 1
| iDescriptor iDefensive Posture Changes I i t i i IPOST D1/| | | | | | I POST D2 | 1 12! Front I Depth 1 Time |
III 1 1 1 ! FD/Delayj x j I * x • x •
Morhange, #472
PD/Delay
Morhange-Faulquemont, #473
FD/Delay i
i ' X •
Bourgaltroff, #474
PD/Delay
Sarre-St. Avoid, #475
PD/Delay
Burbach-Durstel, #478
14
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Durstel-Faerbersviller, #479
1 1 1 I iDescriptor IDefensive Posture Changes 1 1 - 1 IPOST D1/I | | ', I IPOST D2 I 1 | 2 | Front I Depth 1 Time i III i i i • i i i t
) PD/Dela^ x 1 ! s x ! x
1 III t 1
St. Vith, «484
1 i 1 | H/PD i
I x 1 i i
t X i i
Bastogne, #485 1 ! 1HD/Del 1
X r i
.1
1 ■ 1 1
' X X
: A
Jitra, #487 ■
1 |H/PD 1
1
1
1
• i X
1 j 1
1 1
!
i i
1 1
"■" 1 1 1 1
1
The Defense of Moscow, #489
P/FD X
■ i i
1 r
i X X 1 X
Soviet Counteroffensive at Moscow, #490
15
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
The Pogoreloye Gorodishche Offensive, #491 1 "1 1 1
1 i 1
Descriptor Defensi ve Posture Changes
IPOST D1/ IPOST D2 | 1
i
i i 2 1 1
Front i i i i i
Depth Time
I P/FD 1 1 1 x I
1
i i
| i
X x
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase II, #495
P/FD
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase III, #496
Kursk Counteroffensive (Southern Sector), #498
P/FD
Korsun-She\chenkovskiy, #501
P/FD I x
Brody, Phase I, #506
16
)
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Shuri Envelopment, Phase II, #532
II 1 ■ | iDescriptor |Defensive Posture Changes I i 1 IPOST D1/I | | | I iPOST D2 i 1|2| Front 1 Depth 1 Time i iii i i i iii i i
i III ! 1 I FD/Del ! x ! 1 x 1 1 Iii i
Shuri Envelopment, Phase III, #533
FD/Del T
X I I
I
Advance to the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #546
Initial Attack on the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #547
1 1 P/FD i i
1
i x •
1 ■ ' 1 ■ ! • ■ ■ 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1
Capture of the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #548
P/FD
Tilfit-Zababida, #552
17
))
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Nablus, «553
1 1 I iDescrlptor iDefensive Posture Changes 1 ! I IPOST D1/! i i I i {POST D2 | 1 |2| Front 1 Depth I Time i iii i i i III i i
1 III I | H/PD | x | | | 1 x 1 III I 1
Rafah, #554
P/FD
Bir Lahfan, «555
H/PD
El Arish, #557
P/FD
Jebel Libni, #558
Gaza Strip, «559
P/FD • x
18
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Bir Hassna-Bir Thamada, #560
ii i 1 iDescriptor {Defensive Posture Changes iii 1 ', M .„. M ,,„,,,., '
IPOST Dl/I I | I | IPOST D2 1 1 I 2 | Front 1 Depth ! Time i III i i ■ ■ i i i i
| PD/Del j x j j x j I x
1 III 1 1
Suez Canal Assault-North, #569
P/FD x
Suez Canal Assault-South, #570
■ ■ ■ i i
x l i
P/FD
Second Army Buildup, #571
Third Army Buildup, #572
H/PD
i ■ • ^ i
I x
Egyptian Offensive-North, #574
H/PD
19
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Egyptian Offensive-South, #575 i ""7 ' "1' I I 1
I iDescriptor {Defensive Posture Changes ! II IPOST D1/i I | 1 I IPOST D2 | 1 1 2| Front I Depth 1 Time i iii i i : III i i ■ i i i ' i i i . i i i i i
| H/PD ! j X j | |
1 III i
Deversoir (Chinese Farm I), #576
H/PD
Deversoir (Chinese Farm II), #577
Deversoir West, #578
H/PD I i
Ismailia, #579
Jebel Geneifa, #580
i H/PD
20
DEFENDER POSTURE CLARIFICATION
Suez, #584
I POST 01/ I POST D2
j H/PD
Descriptor
( 1
1 1 1 1
2
i 1 1 1 1 1
X
Defensive Posture Changes
Front Depth Time
Ahmadiyeh, #586
j F/PD i i
1 i i
1 X
i i i
1 1 1
Rafid, #587
• F/PD • 1 i i i i i i i i
X I i i
III!
Mount Hermonit, #592
F/PD
T—— r- i i i i i i ,
i
21
-, . -. . - , - . -. ... —.. . ■ m. -, un M.n Mtnm.
Task 7; Identification of the Quality of Strength and Loss Data
The purpose of this task is to provide values that indicate
the adjudged relative levels of reliability for strength and
casualty data. These values, called data reliability estimates,
are intended to be compatible with use in statistical analyses.
The data reliability estimates shown on the Task 7 tables
represent the maximum ranges of possible values for strength or
casualty data expressed in whole numbers as percentages of the
strength or casualty data entered in the "Strength" or "Casual-
ties" columns of the Task 2 tables in Volume III of this study.
For example, the data reliability estimate +25/-15 means that the
range of possible values for a data entry could possibly be as
high as 25% greater than, or as low as 15% less than, the
reported strength or casualty value. In a case where the
reported strength or casualty value is 100 and the data reli-
ability estimate is +25/-15 (i.e., 25% greater than and 15/& less
than 100), the range of possible values is from 125 to 85. Or,
if the reported strength or casualty value is 50 and the data
reliability estimate +25/-15 (i.e., 25% greater than and 15% less
than 50), the range is from 63 to 43.
In general, data reliability estimates are calculated in two
ways. The first is used most often in cases when only one
strength or casualty data value is available for use in the data
base. In these cases, the data reliability estimate is formu-
lated strictly on the analyst's judgment. In making an estimate,
the analyst considers such factors as the methodology used for
the derivation of data, the quality of the source of the data, or
possible bias on the part ^f the author of a data source.
22
• *M n-»Ä • 1 « T « ^ ft T^ TM/IM/l ■ R^ nM.fl »-/l i
If more than one value is available, then the most reliable
values with the greatest differences from the data base number
are used to calculate the data reliability estimates. The dif-
ferences between the data base number and the values of greatest
departure from it, computed as percentages of the data base
value, are the data reliability estimates. Ft)r example,
Confederate (defender) casualties at the Battle of Brandy Station
(#198) are given as 500 in the data base (Dupuy and Dupuy, Ency-
clopedia, p. 885). B&L, 111:263, gives 485 as the Confederate
casualties and Freeman, 111:13, reports 523. The differences
between these values and the data base value are 15 and 23. The
numbers 15 and 23 are computed as percentages of 500 to give data
reliability estimates of -3.0 and +4.6. The equations used are:
15/500 as X/100, so X = 3.0, where X ="Minimum" data reliability estimate.
23/500 as Y/100, eo Y = 4.6, where Y = "Maximum" data reliability estimate.
The data reliability estimate for defender casualties at
Brandy Station is +5/-3 (4.6 being rounded off to the nearest
whole number), i.e., no more than 523 (or 525) and no less than
485 with 500 as the value entered in the data base.
The defender strength in the same battle is reported in the
data base as 10,000 (Dupuy and Dupuy, Encyclopedia, p. 885).
B&L, 111:261, reports 10,292 for defender strength. The number
292 is computed as a percentage of 10,000 to give a data
reliability estimate of +2.92.
292/10,000 as Z/100, so Z = 2.92, where Z = "Maximum" data reliability estimate.
23
1 m^na_ji «L/I K-J\ ■t'l
In this example, the data base value is considered the
minimum possible value, so the data reliability estimate for
defender strength at Brandy Station is shown as +3 (2.92 being
rounded off to the nearest whole number), i.e., no more than
10,292 (or 10,300) and no less than 10,000, the value entered in
the data base.
Date reliability estimates are entered for strength and
casualty data under column headings Strength and Casualties on
the Task 7 tables. The letters A and D in the left-hand column
of the tables refer to attacker and defender.
24
Nieuport, #1
j Strength Casualties
A:
D:
-5
+33/-3
-25
+20
White Mountain, #2
Strength Casualties
A:
D:
-50
+29
+10/-10
+20
Wirapfen, #3
Strength CasualtTes
jA:
D:
-10
-25
-90
+ 3
Dessau Bridge, #4
Strength Casualties.
A:
D:
+29
+25
+33
+20
Lutter, #5
Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+6
-25
+25
+43/-14
Breitenfeld I, #6
| Strength Casualties
A:
p:
+6
-5
-12
-18 |
25
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
The Lech, #7
Strength
A:
D:
+36/-24
-35
Alte Veste, #8
Strength
D:
>9^
-25
Luetzen, #9
Strength
D:
Noerdlingen I, //10
+ 15
XT
D:
Strength
+1Ö/-1Ö
-6
Wittstock, #11
XT
D:
Breitenfeld II, #12
Strength
—1^5
-30 .,
in. i
ID: i i
Strength
-=2V
-13
Casualties
TUKT
+33
Casualties
-ZBTJ
-50
Casualties
TTÜÜ"
+ 100
Casualties
-775
+10/-10
Casualties
-753
-72
[Casualties i .j__2t) i
i -33 i i
26
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES Rocroi, #13
Strength
Tuttlingen, #14
Strengtn
|xrp=r ID: I +33 I I I I
Freiburg, #15
Strength
A:
D:
+5
+31/-6
Jankau, #16
Mergentheim, #17
Strength
IA:
ID:
+30
-27
■dasualties
-100
-16
{Casualties i
i ■^ü"
I +57
Casualties
-25
+ 125
{Casualties
-57
+57/-57
Allerheim (Noerdlingen II), #18
Strength """"
A:
D:
+56/-6
+25/-6
Casualties
-33
-17
Casualties " !
27
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
!
Lens, #19
I Strength I Casualties
|A: j +14 1 -0J5 ! 1 ! 1 ID:I +10/-10 | +20/-20 | 1 I I 1
Edgehlll, #20
Strength
m—+37=5"
D: +2/-13
Marston Moor, #21
D:
Strength
—^5
+3
Tippermuir, #22
rr D:
Strength
+9/-36
+23
Kilsyth, #23
Strength
XT
D: -10
Newbury II, #2M
«T
ID:
Strength
-*n -10
Casualties
-60
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö—
-6
Casualties
-=T3
+200
Casualties
-2
I Casualties
-*5tr
+50
I 28
*, Mn-am m*n'm ««.«-■■ m ». i • F\M fVMnM.n M.A « ^ M n « H «n *_« Kfl ML^ »-^•Ln X^ A,^ )L/
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Naseby, #25
ITT
ID:
Strength
TTl
+3
Preston, #26
Strength
ID: +14/-20
Dunbar, #27
Strength
A:
D:
-5
+18/-9
Worcester, #28
St. Antoine, #29
Strength
A:
D:
-10
+10/-10
The Dunes, #30
Strength
A:
D:
-13
+ 17
(Casualties
TT7
+10/-10
ICasualties
TTUO
+60
Casualties
+200/-33
-8
Casualties
-50
+5/-5
Casualties
-I5Ü
-29
29
The Raab, #31 DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
1 1
Strength iCasualties ; 1
IA: 1 ID: i i
-17
1 -17
+20
+ 10
i
1 1 i
Vienna, #32
i i i
Strength Casualties I
IA: 1 ID: 1
+5/-5
+29
-60 |
+25/-50 I
Chocim II, #33
Strength Casualties ! I
IA:
ID:
-20
-63
+ 100
+25/-25
i i
1 1 1
Sinsheira, #31»
i ■ i
I Strength Casualties 1
IA:
ID: 1 1
-11
+20
-27 1 1
+4/-20 | i
Senef, #35
Strength Casualties i i
IA:
ID:
-10
-7
-30
+43
i
I ! I
Enzheim, #36
i i Strength Casualties i
i
• 1^! ID: i i i i
+5/-5
+20
-29
+60
30
Turckheira, #37 DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Fehrbellin, #38
Sedgemoor #38
Killiecrankie, #40
Walcourt, #41
Fleurus, #42
I Strength i i
[Casualties 1 1
IA: i
ID: I
1 -9
1 +67
I +9 i i
1 -6
I i i
1 1
I Strength i i
(Casualties
IA: 1
ID: i i
I -7
+72
+10/-10
-20
1 Strength i i
Casualties i i i
IA:
ID:
1 -8
-17
-13 1 1
+33 I •
NO
1 Strength i i
Casualties i
1 JA:
ID: 1
+ 114
+ 17
-33
+84
i i
1 i i t
1 Strength Casualties 1 • •
IA:
ID: i
-8
-14
-70 I 1
+131/-28 I i
! Strength 1
Casualties 1
A:
ID:
-20
-21
+20/-10 |
-37 1 1
31
The Boyne, #43 DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
j Strength Casualties
+100
+7
A:
D:
+3
+2
Aughrim, #44
Strength Casualties
+11/-19
+36
A:
D:
-5
-44
Steenkerke, #45
Strength Casualties j
+7
-1 1
A:
D:
+11
+5
Neerwinden (Landen), #46
Marsaglia, #47
Zenta, #48
Strength Casualties 1
A:
D:
-5
-6
-33
-50 |
Strength Casualties
A:
D:
-10
-20
-5
-33 |
32
Poltava, #49 DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
A:
D:
+21/-7
+33/-33
+25
+280
Blenheim, #50
1 Strength 1
Casualties
A:
p: +12/-4
+13/-7
+1/-15 |
-12
Ramillies, #51
j Strength Casualties
+38 |
-32 |
A:
D:
-3
+3
Oudenarde, #52
1 Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+13
-6
+ 507-24
+33/-7 i
Malplaquet, #53
Strength Casualties 1
|A:
D:
-17
+19
+4/-15
+17
Peterwardein, #54
33
i m - - * r m.njm r«_ji, rv»f»J" i\Jt, .WM-k^ JiTVJ Wi M--J # ■ )tv fvit riMIt\Afrit\rjf\&S\mnMit\»tS\HL:\K.'\ ^ ^ H liH^ilr " »i ^ U Ä t
Mollwitz, #55 DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Strength Casualties
-1 A: -13
D: -2 -5
Chotusitz, #56
Strength Casualties
A: -3 -1
D: +14 +4
Dettingen, #57
Strength Casualties
A: +6 -4
D: + 123 +20
Fontenoy, #58
Strength Casualties
A: +6 ■■-.« -
D: +16 +14
Hohenfriedberg, #59
Strength Casualties
A: +40 +1
D: +14 +15
Sohr, #60
Strength
1 Casualties
A: -3 +3
D: -7 +1
34
* ■•>. . i ^ -. M »v KM nw.*t-j..--v« R'w n -H J* u * h *'■ A v * '*,,i-*,V'i A-4 :iM/vw.n «LR nn hL*^ n^i e
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Kesselsdorf/ #61
Strength Casualties
A: +13 +2
D: +12 +58
Prestonpans, #6: >
Strength Casualties
A: +4 +5
D: + 5 +6
Culloden, #63
Strength Casualties
A: +11/-7 -19
D: + 11 -3
Lobositz, #64 •
Strength Casualtfes
A: + 3 +17
D: -4 +4
Prague, #65
Strength Casualties
A: -2 +1
D: -2 +2
Plassey, #66
Strength
1 Casualties
+20 A: +6
D: +1/-3 +14
35
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Kolin, #67
Hastenbeck, #68
Rossbach, #69
Leuthen, #70
Crefeld, #71
Zorndorf, #72
Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+3
+23
+2
+56
Strength
Casualties
-7
-6
A:
D:
-5/-5
-5/-5
Strength Casualties
-17
+9
A:
D:
-2
-9
Strength Casualties
A:
D: +23
-47 ""
+23
. Strength Casualties
-14
+39
A:
D:
+3
+6
Strength Casualties
A:
D:
r—^
+20 + 14
36
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Hochkirch, #73
Strength Casualties
A: -19 +2
D: +35 +13
Bergen, #74
Strength Casualties
A: +13 -40
D: +20 -20
Minden, #75
Strength Casualties
A: -16 +5
D: -13 +1/-1
Kunersdorf, #76 V,
Strength Casualties
A: -6 +8
D: +18 +5
Plains of Abraha m (Quebec), #77
Strength Casualties
A: +11/-11 -20
D: +1 -3
Maxen, #78
Strength Casualties
A: +11 -70
D: -11 +30
37
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Warburg, #79
Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+26
+26
-5
+35
Liegnitz, #80
Strength Casualties
A:
D:
-20
-7
+42
-6
Torgau, #81
Strength Casualties
+19
-2
A:
D:
+ 14
+25
Bunker Hill, #82
Quebec, #83
Strength Casualties
A:
D:
-27
+10/-10
+13/-2
+5/-5
White Plains, #84
Strength Casualcies
A:
D:
-10
+12 +67
38
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Trenton, #85
Strength Casualties"
A: +5/-5 -50
D: -21 [ -6
Princeton, #86
Strength Casualties
A:| -6 +9
D: -42 +27
Freeman's Farm, #8' 1
Strength Casualties
A: -14 +8
D: +20/-20 +5/-5
Germantown, #88
Strength Casualties
A: -2 ■■-T"""
D: -11 -3
Bemis Heights, i m Strength Casualties
A: -20 +10/-10
D: + 10/-W +15
Monmouth Court > louse, #90
Strength
1 Casualties i
A: +10/-10 + 5/-5
D: +27 +5/-5
39
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Camden, #91
Strength
A:
D:
"+T
+31
Casualties
+r/"-5
+42
Cowpens, #92
Guilford Court House, #93
j Strength Casualties
A:
D:
-16
-3
+22
+ 20
Ho^kirk's Hill, #94
| Strength Casualties |
A:
D:
+5/-5
-10
+5/-5
+5/-5
Eutaw Springs, #95
A:
D:
Strength
TlT
-10
Casualties
+25/-24
Valmy, #96
| Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+3
+16
_49- "■ —
-25
40
Jemappes, #97 DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Strength ■~, Casualties ! 1
A:
D:
+ 13
+8
-33
-40
1 1 1 i i
Neerwinden, «98
Strength i
Casualties i
A:
D: ___
)
-9
-7
-10 |
+ 13 !
Hondschoote, #9?
Strength Casualties I 1
A:
D:
i
-29
+23
-33
-30
i
1 1 1
Wattignies, #10C
Strength 1 i i
Casualties i i i
A:
D:
+ 16 I
+ 13
+78 1 1
+67 I I
Fleurus, #101
Strength i i
Casualties 1 i i
A:
D:
+13
+ 11
+20/-43
-75
i
1 ! 1
Lodi, #102
Strength Casualties 1 1
A:
D:
+ 18
+5/-5
+ 122
+10
1 i
I i i
41
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Castiglione, #103
Strength
A:
D:
+ 16
-5
Neresheim #104
Wuerzburg, #105
Strength
A:
D:
+5/-5
+5/-5
Arcola, #106
Strength
D: -13
Rivoli, #107
Strength
A:
D:
-19
-2
Pyramids, #108
Casualties
-=ZB
+5/-5
Casualties
+5/-5
+5/-5
Casualties
-11
Casualties
-56
Casualties I
42
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Stockach I, #109
1 Strength i i
ICasualties i i
i i
1
|D:
1 +5/-b
+45/-8
I +n/-i9 I 1 I 1 -33 1 1 1
Mount Tabor, #110
1 Strength i
Casualties 1 i i
IA: I
ID: ■ i
' -26
1 -11
+10/-10
+66
i
1 I i
Zurich I, #111
1 Strength I
Casualties 1 i
IA:
ID:
+38
+80
+ 1/-6
+8
1 1 I 1
Novi, #112 ■
1 Strength I
Casualties 1
IA:
ID:
+30
+3
-3 I 1
-39 1 i i
Zurich III, #113
1 Strength i i ■ i
Casualties I 1
IA:
ID:
-4
+30 ,-
+5/-5 1 i i
+5/-5 1 i
Moeskirch, #114
i i
u...< Strength Casualties
i
i IA: * 1 . ID: 1 1
-13
+50/-20
-25
-20
i
i i i
i
43
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Marengo, #115
D:
Hohenllnden, #116
Strength
—n— +10/-3
Austerlitz, #117
Strength
A:
D:
+4/-3
+2/-11
Jena, #118
Strength
rr D:
■I.4/-H4
+2/-9
Auerstadt, #119
Strength
A:
D:
-22
+ 1/-4.
Eylau, #120
Strength
1A:
ID:
-23
+4/-19
■Casualties
T27
+14/-20
Casualties
-7
+29/-3
Casualties
-17
Casualties
-35
+ 100
iCasualties
+35/-19
-52
44
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Friedland, #121
irr I I
ID:
Strength -_rg
+2/-23
Vimeiro, #122
Corunna, #123
Strength
iA:
ID:
+27-26
.14
Eckmuehl, #121
D:
Strength
—=53
+21/-9
Aspern-Essling, #125
The Raab, #126
Strength
AT
ID: -31 -32
Casualties
-♦31
-60
Casualties
+88/-41I—
-20
Casualties
+42/-5Ö—
-50
{Casualties
.1 -25
+61/-19
45
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Wagram, #127
1 Strength 1
Casualties 1 1
A: : ID: l_
1 +35
! +5/-8
1 +9/-12 I 1
-43 1 1
Talavera, #128
I Strength i i
ICasualties i i i i i
|A:
D:
! +22/-35
-34
I +20
+21/-19
Bussaco, #129
Strength Casualties 1
A:
D:
1 +1/-12
-38
+2/-1 1
-8 1
Fuentes de Onorc M30
Strength Casualties i 1
A:
D:
-38
+2/-20
+11/-19
-17
i i i i
1 i
Albuera, #131
Strength Casualties 1 i i
A:
D:
+5/-22
+60 .-
+5/-5 |
-20 1
Salamanca, #132
Strength Casualties 1 i i
A:
D:
+6/-13 •
+ 19
-13 1
+31/-8 I i
46
Vittoria, #133
Borodino, HIS1*
Luetzen, #135
Bautzen, #136
Dresden, #137
Leipzig, #138
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
D:
Strength
rnrz-rr -26
D:
Strength
+n/-5
+2/-25
Strength
jTT
ID:
"^5
+20/-3
IT
D:
Strength
+1/-16
+3/-1
Strength
D: -20
Strength
IftT
ID: -13
Casualties
+17/-3
+14/-27
Casualties _TIJ
+30
Casualties
•3P
-41
Casualties
-=ZG
-115
Casualties
+5/-5
{Casualties
■! +23/-18
I +22
47
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Hanau, #139
Strength
IT
D: +9
La Rothiere, #140
Laon, #141
A:
ID:
+9/-37
+ 18
Arcis-sur-Aube, #142
D:
Strength
—^25
+7/-18
Ligny, #143
Casualties
-66
Strength
A:
D:
+ 12
+3
Strength I Casualties
+ 100
+100/-13
I Casualties
"♦Brqs
-20
A:
D:
Quatre Bras, #144
Strength
-3
+ 12
Casualties
+ 14/,-4
+4/-11
Strength
A:
D:
-10
+7
48
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Waterloo, #145
Strength Casualties 1 i
ITT
ID:
#146
I +9
1 -9
+32
-7
i
1 1 i i
The Thames,
Strength Casualties 1 1
ITT
ID:
47
1 -6
-26
+5/-5 1 I
+5/-5 | i
Chlppewa, #1
Strength Casualties 1 1 irr
ID: 1
, #148
1 -14
1 +32
-31 I I
. -2 I I
Lundy's Lane •
i i
Strength Casualties I
ITT 1 ID: i i
#149
+29
-7
+5/-5 !
+5/-5 \
New Orleans,
Strength Casualties I
irr ID: l__.
+21
+9 -- i i
-22 i
+5/-5 \
Boyaca, #150
Strength Casualties i
1 A:
D:
-33 !
-10 i
+ 10 —
-11
i
i
i
i
49
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Carabobo, #151
Bombona, #152
ITT
D:
Strength
TTI
-9
Pichincha, #153
Junin, #15^
D:
Strength
—1515
-35
Ayacuoho, #155
San Jacinto, #156
A:
D:
Strength ___
-25
{Casualties
"=TT
I +10 1 1
Casualties
T3 -46
Casualties
+ 124
-2
Casualties
"^3
-70
50
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Palo Alto, #157
i Strength 1 Casualties 1 II 1 |A:| +2 I +ijj i II 1 1 ID:| +10 1 -25 1 1 I 1 1
Resca de la Palma, #158
17
D:
Buena Vista, #159
Strength
TJS -11
A:
D:
Cerro Gordo, #160
Strength
+57
+5/-5
IT
D:
Strength
"~r5
+8
Contreras, #161
D:
Strength •_n
+25
Churubusco, #162
\tr ID:
Strength
" +6/-11
+71
Casualties
"■+1
+34
Casualties
+85/-25
+0/-0
Casualties
~=7
-1
Casualties
""=3
-1
{Casualties i
.1. Tf
+ 130
51
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Molino del Rey, «163
Chapultepec, #164
The Alma, #165
Inkerman, #166
Magenta, #167
Solferino, #168
Strength ICasualties j i
!A:
ID:
I +n/-3
i -17
1 +1/-1 1 1 -37 I
1 1 1 1
64
1 Strength 1
ICasualties I 1
IA: I
ID: i i
1 +*/-3
1 -7
1 -1
-6
1 1 1 i i
j Strength Casualties 1 i i
IA: 1 ID: i i
-9
♦5
+5
+ 10
i i
1 1 i i
•
1 Strength Casualties 1 I
IA:
ID:
-4
+4
-21
+7
1 1 1 1
1 Strength 1
Casualties ! i i
IA: 1 ID: i i i
+3
-14 .
+2 1 i
-1 i i i
1 Strength 1
Casualties I
IA: 1 ID: 1 1
-17
-8
+3 i + 1 1
52
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Sadowa (Koeniggraetz), #169
I I ITT
ID:
Strength
--+2
I Casualties
'I +9/-2
-5 I +2/-10
Custozza II, #170
Strength iCasualties
ITT
ID: -1
'"TT i i
I -17
First Bull Run (First Manassas), #171
Strength {Casualties
♦ib/-y—
-12
Wilson's Creek, #172
Casualties
+10/-1Ö—
+8
Belmont, #173
irr
ID:
Mill Springs, #174
Strength
-15
Casualties
+20/-2-0 h40
Strength ICasualties
I AT i
JD: i i
-38
1 -noz-io
-6
53
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Fort Donelson, #175
1 Strength ICasualties
|A:| -29 1 1 1
!D:| 4.10/-10
I +1U/-1U
1 +11 1
Pea Ridge, #176
I Strength i i
'Casualties
! !A:| -14 1 1 |D:| +14 1 1
Kernstown, #177
1 -38 1 -6 1
1
1 1 Strength | 1
Casualties ! i
i i
i |A:| ■•■40/-11
ID:! +29 • i i i
1 -3 i
! +10/-10
i
1 1 1
i Shiloh, #178 ■.
i 1 Strength Casualties i 1
1 |A:| -10
|D:| -6 ! 1 I
, +10/-10
+10/-10
1 1 I i i
1 Front Royal, #179
1 Strength Casualties i i i
1 |Ä:| +6 1 ! 1
|D:| -6 .- • i i i
+43 !
+5/-5 1 i
1 First Winchester, #180
1 1 Strength i i
Casualties 1 i i
|A:| *b i ! ! 1 |D:| +21
+ 10 I !
-29 I i i
54
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Cross Keys, #181
ITT I ID: l_
Port Republic, #182
Strength
—rm— + 10
ID:
Strength
-^3
+67/-17
Seven Pines (Fair Oaks), #183
Mechanicsville, #181
Strength
Gaines's Mill, #185
D:
Strength
+1Ö/-1Ö
+10/-10
Glendale-Frayser's Farm, #186
Strength
IÄT i
ID: i i
■••10/-10
I Casualties I I *b/-b
] +5/-5
Casualties
TTO
+10/-10
Casualties
-&T=S
+5/-5
{Casualties
irr -39
D: I -36
Casualties
+ 1Ö/-3.Ö—
+10/-10
{Casualties i
.1. •H0/-10
I +10/-10
55
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Malvern Hill, #187
Strength ICasualtles
+1Ü/-10—
■»•10/-10
Cedar Mountain, #188
Strength
Second Bull Run (Second Manassas), #189
I Strength
A:
D:
+10/-10
+10/-10
South Mountain, #190
Strength
Antietara (Sharpsburg), #191
Strength
!A7j ^TS
!D:I +13/-J-3
Casualties
-11
-3
{Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö
+10/-10
Casualties
+10/-10
-18
Corinth, #192
Strength
A:
D:
-9
♦9/-5
{Casualties
-►KV-io
+10/-10
56
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Perryville, #193
Strength
A:
D:
-27
-6
Casualties
+10/-10
+10/-10
Fredericksburg, #194
Murfreesboro (Stones River), #195
Chancellorsville, #196
Champion's Hill, #197
StrengtH
A:
D:
+19/-32
-10
Casualties
+10/-10
+20/-10
Brandy Station, #198
| Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+10
-19
+10/-10
+15
Strength Casualties |
A:
D:
+9
+5
-13
+3
l Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+18/-14
-6
-3
-3
! strength Casualties
A:
D:
-8
+3
+4/-4
+5/-3
57
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Gettsburg, «199
i Strength Casuartfes |
A:
DJ
+3/-7
+12
-21
+5/-5
Chickamauga, #200
i ätrengtn Casualties
A:
D:
+6
-2
-4
+10/-10
Chattanooga, #201
1 Strength Casualties
A:
D:
-8
+15
+10/-10
+10/-10
The Wilderness, #202
StrengtTT üasüaTETes"
Spotsylvania, #203
New Market, #204
| Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+10/-20
+15/-15
-40
+50
i Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+25/-10
+10/-10
+10/-10
+10/-10
58
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Cold Harbor, «205
A:
D:
Strength
-Tig
-10
Casualties
-r^?
+33/-33
Kenesaw Mountain, #206
Strength Casualties
A:
p: -13
-2
+22 |
+81
Peachtree Creek, #207
A:
D:
Strength
""+röf/-lT"
+10/-10
Casualties
-rrr— +10/-10
Atlanta, #208
Strength (Tasualties
A:
p: +10/-10
+10/-10
"+0
-2
Petersburg, #209
! Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+10/-10
+10/-10
+40
+20/-20 |
Globe Tavern, #210
Strength Casualties
+10/-10
+20/-20 1
A:
ID:
+10/-10
+10/-10
59
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Opequon Creek (Third Winchester), #211
D:
Cedar Creek, #212
Strength
♦HV-iö
-29
irr ID:
"Strength
+1Ö/-1Ö
+10/-10
Franklin, #213
ITT
D:
Strength
T2
+ 15
Nashville, #214
XT
D:
Bentonville, #215
Strength
♦1Ö/-1Ö
+10/-10
Strength
A:
D:
-20
-20
{Casualties
! +1ö/-iö
I +17
casualties
+10/-10—
+10/-10
casualties
+1ö/-iö—
+10/-10
{Casualties
Tö/.fff
! +11
Casualties
+26/-19
+10/-10
Dinwiddle Court House & White Oak Road, #216
Strength
A:
D:
+10/-10
+10/-10
Casualties
+10/-10
+30/-20
60
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Five Forks, #217
A.,
Strength _TÖ
!D:| -10
Selma, #218
i*1! strength
-^73
ID:| -29
Sayler's Creek, #219
|"~ Strength
1A:
ID: i i
Weissenburg, #220
♦33
-25
I Strength
irr ID:
♦37
+ 17
Froeschwiller (Woerth), #221
I Strength
Spichern, #222
i i
A. i i i ID: | i i ■ i
Strength
"^33
iCasualties
' T5B
j +10/-10
iuasuaities
"=25
•»■25/-25
Casualties
I ■»•10/-10
I -11 i i
Casualties
"=5B
+10/-5
iCasualties
757115
-16
jCasualties
^25
"j +5/-7
I +32
61
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Mars la Tour, #223
Strength
i ** * i I I ID: I i i i i
+ 17
Gravelotte-St. Privat, #224
Strength
ITT
ID:
♦5Ö/-5Ö
+10/-50
Sedan, #225
Coulmlers, #226
'Strength
Orleans, #227
Strength
|A:j +15/-15
ID:| +38/-45
Le Mans, #228
Strength
IA:
ID:
+24
+36
Casualties
"TTtt
+21
I Casualties
•757^5
+5/-5
■Casualties
Casualties
+5/-5
+5/-5
I Casualties
-15
+10/-4
62
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Belfort, #229
Isandhlwana, #230
strength
IAH ^53
ID: + 15
Ulundi, #231
ITT
D:
Strength
"=5?
-6
Majuba Hill, #232
Tel el-Kebir, #233
Omdurman, #234
Strength
|ä. ( i i
ID: |
"=27—
+5/-5
idasuaities
+25/-25
+ 15
löasualties
'I +25/-25
-21
[Casualties
'+57=5
+50
[Casualties
"=Tr I +5
63
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Adowa, #235
| ätrength Casualties |
A:
p: -25
-5
+25A2"5
-7 i
Modder River, «236
i Strength cTasüaTties |
A:
p: +25
+100
+3
-47 |
Magersfontein, #237
Strength Casualties
A:
p: -13
-11
+14
+36 |
Colenso, #238
i Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+34
+9/-27
+1 1
-40 |
Spion Kop, #239
Strength Casualties
-32 '
+34 |
A:
D:
-25
-25
Paardeberg, #240
| Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+33
+25
+8
+43 |
64
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
San Juan and El Caney, #241
Strength
A:
D:
+10/-10
+7
(Casualties
+10/-10"
+10/-10
The Yalu, «242
1 äitfength Casualties
A:
D:
-29
-44
-21
+81/-12
Telissu, #243
Strength Casualties
-17
+32/-8 |
A:
D:
+11
-22
Liaoyang, #244
| Strength Casualties 1
A:
D:
+63
-12
"SI ""
+52 1
The Sha-Ho, #245
! sYrength Casualties
A:
D:
+19
+38
+30/-7
+18/-7
Sandepu, #246
Strength Casualties
A:
p: +47
+15/-15
+15/-23
+ 11 {
65
Mukden, «247
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
\ Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+59
+20
+15 "■■
+30
Kumanovo, #248
| Strength Casualties
A:
D:
-10
-36
-40
+50 j
Lule* Burgas, #249
| Strength Casualties |
A:
D:
-33
+15/-15
+9
+15/-15
Prelip, #250
Strength Casualties
A:
D:
-20
+25
-33
+10/-10
Monastir, #251
! Strength Casualties
A:
p: -17
-33
+10/-10
-15
Adrianople, #252
A:
D:
Strength
-T2r— -20
Casualties
+15/-15
66
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Warsaw, #253
| Strength Casualtfes j
A;
p: +25
-25
+2fll/-,2ö ""
-20
The Nieman, #254
Guadalajara-Brihuega, #255
A:
D:
Strength
'" "+T07-T0"
+10/-10
Casualties
+u/'ia— +10/-10
Changkufeng/Shachaoteng, #256
Hill 52/Shachaofengf #257
A:
D:
Strength
+25/-25
+15/-15
Casualtfes
+13/-I3
+50/-50
Changkufeng/Hill 52, #258
i StrengtH Casualties
+15/-15
+20/-20
A:
p: +15/-15
+20/-20
I Strength" Casualties \
A:
p: +20/-20
+15/-15
+25/-25
-25 1
67
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Nomonhan: Opening Engagement, #259
I Strength
IXT
ID: ♦20/-20
I casualties
I +15/-15 I I +60/-M0
Nomonhan: Soviet Counteroffensive, #260
|~ strength
rr ID: i
Suomussalmi, #261
•••15/-15
I XT
ID:
strength
-HTJ
+10/-10
Alsace-Lorraine I, #262
Strength
Alsace-Lorraine II, #263
Strength
A:
D:
The Ardennes, #264
+7/-8
-17
Strength
ICasualties
TTÖ—
+2/-6
{Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö
♦33
lüasualties
+3Ö/-3Ö
+30/-30
Casualties
+30/-30
+30/-30
iCasualties
+30/-30
+30/-30
68
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
The Sambre, #265
1 Strength 1
[Casualties
1 +3Ö/-3Ö
1 +30/-30
IA:! -10 ! 1 ID:! +8/-10 j i
Mons, #266
! Strength iCasualties i I 1
IA:! +23/-3B
ID:| -29 ! 1
1 +47
1 +5/-5
i I i I
Le Cateau, #267
I Strength iCasualties ! 1 !
|A:| -60
ID:! +33 i i i i
1 +10/-10
+3
i i
1 1 I
Guise, #268
1 Strength i •
Casualties 1 • t
|A:I -10 1 1 ID:! -20 1 1
+3Ü/-3Ü
+30/-30
! ! I I
The Heights of Nancy, #269
! Strength Casualties i
!A:i ♦25/.2B
ID:! -27 I 1
+31
+10/-42 !
The Ourcq I , #270
! Strength Casualties !
IA:! +37
ID:! -15
-29 1 1
-20 1
69
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
The Ourcq II, #271
1 Strength [Casualties 1
i i
|A:| +2Ö/-2Ö i I |D:| +20/-20 ! I
I +2Ö/-2Ö
I +20/-20
The Petit Morin, #272
I Strength i i
[Casualties i 1 1
|A:| -14 ! 1 |D:| +43 i i i i
1 -31
1 +21
i
i i i
The Two Morins, #273
i Strength {Casualties ! I 1
|A: | +11/-i|4
|D:| +15/-15
1 -32 I i i
I +15/-15 1 1 1
The Marshes of St. Gond, #274
1 Strength ■
[Casualties i 1
|A:| +14 1 1 |D:| -18 ! 1
-13
-35
i
! I I
Vitry le Francois, #275
• Strength Casualties 1 i i
IA:| +27 ,. i 1 ID:| -15 ! !
+4 1 !
-11 | i
The Gap of Revigny, #276
i btrengtn i i i
oasuaities i i i
IA:| +27 1 I I 1 |D:| -16 | 1 I 1
+ 17
-10
■-1
i
1 • i i i
70
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
- The Aisne, #277
Strength
I A: | +2ö/'-2Ö
ID:| +20/-20
Stalluponen, #278
Gumbinnen, #279
Tannenberg, #280
Masurian Lakes, #281
Strength
IA:
!D:
+ 15/-,^
+15/-15
Krasnik, #282
jCasualtles
I +2Ö/'-2Ö
I +20/-20
Casualties
♦92/-14
-U0
rCasualtles
TTÖ
+ 15
Casualties
-50
-20
71
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Komarov, #283
I-" Strength [Casualties i
1 irr ID: 1
-33 1 1 -27 i i
1 ♦1Ö/-25 1 1 ♦10/-25 i i
1 1 1 1
Gnila Lipa, «284
1 Strength i i
{Casualties i 1 1
IA: 1 ID: I
| -17
-17
1 +10/-25 1 1 +10/-25
1 1 1 i i
Rava Russka, #285
1 Strength 1
{Casualties 1 1 1
IA: 1 ID: i i -
1 -25
-25
| ♦10/-25
I +10/-25
1 1 1 1
Lodz, #286
1 Strength 1
[Casualties ■""I
IA: 1 ID:
• 1
+10/-10
+15/-15
+10/-10
+15/-15 !
The Jadar, #287
i Strength 1 ^ 1
Casualties 1
lATi 1 1 ID:! i i
-25 „
-25
-31
-11
The Kolubra, #288
i btrengtn 1 !
casualties . i
lAT^ ! 1 ID: | 1 1
-20 |
-20 1
+15
+15
72
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Eastern Champagne, #289
I"" Strength
ITT I ID: i i
♦1Ö/-1Ö
-t-IOZ-IO
Neuve Chapelle, #290
I Strength
ITT
ID:
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Ypres II, #291
Festubert, #292
ITT
ID:
Strength
+1Ö/-1Ö
+20/-5
Loos, #293
icasuaities
'| +1Ö/-1Ö I j +10/-10 i i _
[Casualties
Ttt 1 +
I +15/-15
ICasualtles
-^715
♦ 16
The Winter Battle (Masuria), #294
^Strength
73
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Gorllce-Tarnow (Opening Phase Only), #295
Strength
A:
D: l_
First Isonzo, #296
+37
Strength
IA:
ID:
+20/-20
+20/-20
Second Isonzo, #297
IST I i ! i
!D: I
Third Isonzo, #298
Strength
+20/-2Ö
♦20/-20
Fourth Isonzo, #299
A:
D:
Strength
-15
-15
iCasualties
\-^
+23
Casualtl'es
+10/-10
♦5
Casualties
-=5Ü
-14
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö—
+15
Casualties
+10/-10—
+ 15
First Dardanelles Landing, #300
—strength
D: + 10
Casusrltles-
-T5B
+20
74
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Suvla Bay, #301
Strength
Kut-el-Amara, #302
IT
D:
Strength
+ 1ö/'-1Ö
+15/-15
Ctesiphon, #303
First Somme, #304
A:
D:
Strength
+15/-15
-17
jCasualties
IITT -10 1 ! ID:| -15 II
I I +25 i i
I Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
I Strength jCasualties i
|A:| -18 1 ♦1Ö/-1Ö 1 1 ! 1 1 ID:j -12 1 +10/-10 I 1 I I . 1
Casualties
-TWT=B
+8
Somme, Fourth Army Attack, #305
Strength
A:
D:
-25
-15
Casualties
+5/-5
+ 10
Somme, Ovillers, #306
IT
D:
Strength
"^T5
-15
Casualties
"T57^5
+5/-5
75
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Somne, Bazentin Ridge, #307
i Strength 1
{Casualties 1
1 1 1
|A:| -33 I I |D:| +15 1 1
1 +2/'-2 i 1 ♦ISZ-IS 1 1
1 1 1 1
Somme, Flers-Courcelette, #308
1 Strength 1
[Casualties 1
|A:| -20 1 1 |D:| -20 1 1
I +20/-20 1 I ^OZ-IO 1
Caucasus Winter Offensive, #309
1 Strength !Casualties 1
1
|A:| -22 1 1 |D:| -20 1 1
I +20 1 I +20 i i
1 1 1 1
i 1
Lake Narotch, #310
1 Strength [Casualties 1
|A:! -14 1 1 |D:| -50 i i i i
1 -30 1
+10/-10 |
1916 Brusilov Offensive, #311
1 Strength Casualties ! • •
|A:j ♦5/'-15,
|D:| H.5/-15 ! 1
+5/-15 1 1
+5/-15 i i i
Fifth Isonzo, #312
i strength tasüäicies i •
|A:! +20/'-2ö 1 1 |D:| +207-20 | 1 .' '
+31 1 !
+10/-10 | 1
76
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Asiago, #313
strength
A: I *2Ö/-iÖ
D:| +20/-20 i
Casualties
+15/-1B
+15/-15
Trentino Counteroffensive, #314
Strength "~~
Sixth Isonzo (Gorizia), #315
Arras, #316
Aisne II, #317
Messines, #318
Strength
AT! +20/-20
D:i +20/-20
Strength
IA:
ID:
-15
-10
I Casualties
IA:| +20/-20 I I ID:| ^20/-20
i i
♦15/-15
+31»/-15
Casualties
TT5
+ 15
!Casualties I tts i + i
I +10/-10 I I
77
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Ypres III, #319
I Strength {Casualties i 1
|A:j -10
ID:| -10
1 -23 1 1 1 1 -26 i 1
Cambral I, #320
I Strength •
{Casualties 1 1
!A:| +5
|D:| +10/-10 i i i i
1 +15 1 i i i i
1 +15 1 i i
Cambrai II, #321
1 Strength Casualties 1 •
|A:! +10 I 1 |D:| -10 i i
+15 I
+ 15 ! i i
Tenth Isonzo, #322
I Strength ■Casualties 1 i
|A:| +15/-15 1 i |D:| +20/-10 1 1
-64 1 1
-64 I
Eleventh Isonzo, #323
I Strength Casualties ! i i
!A:| +20/-20
|D:| +20/-20 1 1
+15/-15 1 1
+15/-15 I !
Caporetto (Twelfth Isonzo), #324
1 Strength Casualties I i
jA:| +2Ö/-2Ö
ID:! +20/-20 i i i i i i
+15/-15 "j i
+ 15 1 • i
78
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Crossing of the Tigris, #325
I"" strengtn
i i
ID:| +15/-15
Gaza I, #326
Gaza II, #327
Strength
A:
D:
-25
-25
Gaza III, #328
Junction Station, #329
Strength
icasualties
I + 10/-10
+15/-15
I Casualties i
"I +5
+10/-10
Casualtfes
-7ST*>
+ 15
Second Somme, Phase I (Somme-Peronne), #330
Strength
i Strength tcasualties t 1 1 I jAVI -25 1 -5 1
|D:| -25 1 -5 1 ii i i
79
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Second Somme, Phase II (Somme-Peronne), #331
""""" I Casualties
Lys, #332
Strength I Casualties
A:
D:
-10
-10
I +10/-20
I ♦10/-20 i i
Yvonne and Odette Positions, #333
Strength ™"
A:
D:
+15/-15
+10/-10
Cheroin des Dames, #334
IT
D:
Strength
TTO
+10/-10
C^ntigny, #335
Belleau Wood, #336
IT
D:
strength
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
■Casualties
+15/-1B
+10/-10
Casualties
-TT^
-15
Casualties
+1ö/-i0
+15/-15
1 Strength jCasualties 1 1 ' ' !A:| ♦lOZ-IO 1 +10/-10 I I i ' 1 1 |D:| +15/-15 1 -15 1 II 1 I
80
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Hill 142, #337
Strength
lÄTI +107-10 I ! ID:| +15/-15
West Wood I, #338
irr ID:
Bouresches I, #339
Strength
♦1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
A:
D:
Strength
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Hill 192, #340
I Strength
IA: i i
ID:
+10/-10
+15/-15
West Wood II, #341
Strength
IA:
ID:
+io/-ro
♦15/-15
ICasualties
■|"V1o/-io
I +15/-15
Casualties
♦ lÖAIÖ
+15/-15
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö—
+15/-15
Casualties
+10/-10
+15/-15
Casualties
■»■10/-10
+15/-15
North Wood I, The Hunting Lodge, #342
A:
D:
Strength
+i(V-10
♦15/-15
Casualties
■».1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
81
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Bouresches II, «343
1 Strength [Casualties 1
North Wood II,
IA:| ♦ISZ-IS
|D:i ♦10/-10 1 !
#344
I +15A15 |
1 +10/-10 | 1 1
1 Strength i
{Casualties ! i i
|A:| +10/-10 1 ! |D:| +15/-15 ! 1
I +10/-1Ö I 1 1 1 +15/-15 1 1 1
North Wood III , #345
1 Strength [Casualties 1 i i
|A:! ♦1Ö/-iÖ 1 1 |D:| +15/-15 1 1
| +1Ö/-1Ö 1 i i
+15/-15 1 1 1
North Wood IV (Final Assault), 1W 46
1 Strength Casualties i
|A:| +1Ö/'-1Ö
ID:! +15/-15 1 I 1 I
, +1Ö/'-10 1 i
+15/-15 1 1
Vaux, #347
1 Strength i
Casualties ! I 1
|A:| +1Ö/-1Ö II " 1 ID:| +15/-15 1 1 1 1
♦1Ö/-1Ö |
+15/-15 ! 1
La Roche Wood East, #318
1 strength | casualties I
|A:| +1Ö/-1Ö I
ID:| +15/-15 1
+10/-1Ö |
+15/-15 1
82
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
La Roche Wood West, #349
i Strength ICasualties 1
|A:! +1Ö/'-1Ö
ID:! +15/-15 1 1
1 ♦löZ-io
1 +15/-15 1
Noyon-Montdidier, #350
1 Strength ICasualties i
I 1
|A:| +9
ID:| +15/-15 i I
1 +10/-10 I 1 1 I +10/-10 1 1 1
Champagne-Marne, #351
I Strength ICasualties I 1
|A:| +10/-10
ID:! -15 1 1
| ♦1Ö/-10
+10/-10
i i
1 1 i
Aisne-Marne I, #352
! Strength Casualties 1
|A:j +i5/-iö 1
10:1 +15/-15 i i 1
♦15/-1B I I
+15/-15 1 i
Missy aux Bois Ravine, #353
1 Strength ■ i i i
Casualties i
|A:| +10/-10 1 1 !D:| +15/-15 1 i i i i i i
+10/-10 I
+15-15 1 1
Brevil, #354
1 Strength l I !
Casualties 1 ! 1
|A:| +10/-10 |
10:1 ♦15/-15
+10/-10 1 1
+15/-15 1 1
83
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
St. Amand, «355
■
I Strength 1 casualties ! I +10/-10 . 1 +15/-15 1
1 1
|A:| ♦10/-10 1 1 |D:| f15/-15 1 I
Beaurepaire Form, #356
1 1
I Strength i
1 Casualties i 1 1
|A:! ♦1Ö/-1Ö 1 1 |D:| +15/-15 • i i i
I +10/-10 i
| +15/-15 1
Cravancon Ferme-Chaudun, #357
i Strength {Casualties ! i
|A:j +1Ö/-1Ö
|D:| +15/-15
+1Ö/-10
■.•15/-15
Chaudun, #358
1 Strength Casualties i i i
|A:| +10/-10 1 1 |D:| +15/-15 1 1
+10/-10
•M5/-15
1 1 1 i
Aisne-Marne II, #359
i strength casualties i
i
|A:j ♦15/-15
ID:! ♦15/-'I5 i 1
+15/-15 I
Berzy le Sec, #360
1 Strength Casualties 1
1 jA:j +iU/-IU
\D:\ +15/-15 I I !
■HU/-IU
+15/-15 j
84
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Buzancy Ridge, #361
IT
D:
Strength
♦1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Picardy, 1918, Phase I, #362
I Strength
|A:j ♦T57=T5 i i
ID: | ■ i i i
+15/-15
Picardy, 1918, Phase II, #363
Strength ~
A:
ID:
+15/-15
+15/-15
St. Mihiel, #364
I IT
!D:
Strength
+25/-2Ö
+25
TüasuaTTTST
+1ö/-iö
+15/-15
üasuaities
TT37^T5—
I +15/-15
Casualties
+15/-15
■»■15/-15
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö—
+20
Lahayville-Bols de Lamarche, #365
Strength ~™™* Casualties
IA:
:D:
+10/-10
+15/-15
+10/-10
+15/-15
Meuse-Argonne, Phase I, #366
Strength 'Casualties
A:
D:
+25/-25
+25/-25
+20/-20
+20/-20
85
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Blanc Mont I, #367
strengen
|A:| +5/-5 ! I ID:I +15/-15 II
Meddeah Farm, #368
strength
+ 1Ö/-1Ö IA: I ID:| +15/-15 i i
Essen Hook, #369
| AT
ID:
Strength
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Blanc Mont Ridge, #370
Strength
XT
D:
Sominepy Wood, #371
-15
Strength
IA:
ID:
Blanc Mont II, #372
T1Ö7-1Ö
+ 15
I Strength
-TZü I ( ID: I -20
üasuaities
"1T7I5
+15/-15
icasuaities
+15/-15
Casualties
+ 1Ö/'-1Ö
+15/-15
iCasualties
l*"=25
I -15
■Casualties
N— I +15
| Casualties i i
•i" I "=Tr
I +25/-25
86
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Meuse-Argonne, Phase II, #373
I strength ~" iCasualties
A:| +25/-25
D: | ♦as/^S i
i
I .2Ö/-2Ö
I ♦20/-20
Exermont-Montrefagne, #374
Strength ■casualties
+1ö/-1,(r
+15/-15
Mayache Ravine, #375
Strength
XT
D:
+ 1Ö/'-10
+15/-15
Casualties
+10/-10
+15/-15
La Neuville le Comte Ferme, #376
Strength ~~"""
D:
+1Ö/-1Ö
♦15/-15
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö—
+15/-15
Ferme des Granges-Fleville, #377
I"" Strength iCasualties
A:
D:
+10/-10
+15/-15
+10/-10
+15/-15
Hill 212, #378
Strength iCasualties
IA:
ID: i
+10/-10
+15/-15
+10/-10
•»•15/-15
87
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Bois de Boyon-Montrefagne, #379
luasuaities
I ID:
strengen
♦1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
j +1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Hill 272, #380
I*"- ötrengtn
I XT] -».IOZ-IO
ID: I +15/-15
ICasuaitl^s
j +10/-10
I +15/-15 i
Meuse-Argonne, Phase III, #381
IA:
ID:
Strength
+25/-25
+25/-25
Remilly-Aillicourt, #382
Strength
A:
D:
+10/-10
+15/-15
Hill 252 - Pont Maugis, #383
Strength
IA:
ID:
+10/-10
+15/-15
The Piave, #384
I Strength
■=3* i i
ID:| +10/-20 i i
ICasualties
+20/-20
+20/-20
Casualties'
H-IÖZ-iÖ
+15/-15
ICasualties I ♦10/-10
♦15/-15
ICasualties
-=2H
+22/-10
88
Megiddo, «385 DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Strength """" I Casualties
A:
D:
^3
+25/-25
Alam Haifa, #386
El Alamein II, #387
I AT i
ID:
Strength
I +10/-10
Operation "Lightfoot," #388
Strength
A:
D:
+5/-5
+10/-10
■ntr | 410
I Casualties
TF7^5
+10/-10
Casualties
^/-5
+10/-10
Alamein Bridgehead Expansion, #389
Strength """""
Operation "Supercharge," #390
Strength
|Ä:j +57-5
ID: ♦10/-10
{Casualties i
"j +5/-5
I +10/-10 I
89
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Chouigui Pass, #391
I*"* Strength
A:j -15 I
D:| -15
El Guettar, «392
Sedjenane-Bizerte, #393
I"" Strength
IA:
ID: i i
Amphitheater, #394
T57^5~-
+10/-15
D:
Strength
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Port of Salerno, #395
|~" Strength
Casualties
+50/-50
casualties
♦TTTm—
+5/-5
ICasualties
+5/-5
+25/-25
ICasualties
+1Ö/-1Ö
I +15/-15
ICasualties
IA: i
ID:
+10/-10
♦15/-15
+10/-10
+15/-15
Sele-Calore Corridor, #396
I Strength Casualties
A:
D:
+5/-5
+15/-15
+5/-5
+15/-15
90
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Battipaglia I, #397
IT
D:
Strength
+15/-15
•••10/-10
I Casualties
I -».lOZ-IO
Vietri I, #398
ID:
Strength
+1B/-1B
+10/-10
Casualties
+15/-1B
♦10/-10
Tobacco Factory, #399
Strength
IA:
ID:
+15/-15
+10/-10
Battipaglia II, #100
Strength
lArJ +1ö/-Tir
ID:| +15/-15
Eboll, #101
Strength
A:
D:
♦5/-5
+15/-15
Vietri II, #402
I Strength
ID:! +10/-10 i t i i
Casualties
+15/-15
+10/-10
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö—
+15/-15
Casualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
■Casualties
ATI—^ISZ-IS ! 4-I5/-I5
I +10/-10
91
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Grazzanise, #403
Strength
IITT ! I ID: | +15/-15
Caiazzo, #404
IT
D:
Strength
+15/-15
Capua, #405
Strength
IA:
ID:
+10/-1Ö
+15/-15
Castel Volturno, #406
strength
Monte Acero, #407
A:
ID:
Strength
+5/-5
+15/-15
Triflisco, #408
A:
D:
Strength
+15/-15
{Casualties
I +1Ö/-1Ö I I +15/-15 i
Casualties
•^57^5
♦15/-15
Casualties
+10/-10
+15/-15
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Casualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
Casualties
TBT^ +15/-15
92
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Dragoni, #109
Strength
IA:| *5/-5
ID: •»■15/-15
Canal I, #410
A:
D:
Strength
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Monte Grande (Volturno), #411
Strength
IA:
ID:
+10/-10
+15/-15
Canal II, #412
D:
Strength
♦1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Francolise, #413
Santa Maria Oliveto, #414
i
i
ID:
Strength
+b/-b
♦10/-10
!Casualties I i + FT^r
I +15/-15 i i
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö
■•■15/-15
Casualties
+1ö/-io
415/-15
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
i Strength iCasualties i 1 I 1 IA:j +10/-10 | +10/-10 1 II 1 1 ID: l ♦15/-15 1 +15/-15 1 1 i 1 1
{Casualties
+b/-b
I +10/-10
93
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Monte Camino I, #415
I strength iCasualties
A:
D:
Monte Lungo, #416
+10/-10
+15/-15
Strength
|A:
ID:
+5/-5
+15/-15
Pozzilli, #417
irr ID:
Strength
+15/-15
Monte Camino II, #418
I strength
Monte Rotondo, #419
IA:
ID:
"Strength
+5/-5
+15/-15
Calabritto, #420
I Strength i
I'TTTJ—+iu/-iu-
ID:! +15/-15
I ♦lOZ-lO
•••15/-15
Casualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
Casualties
-757^5
+15/-15
{Casualties
15/-15
10/-10
{Casualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
ICasualties
I- _ +10/-ID
I +15/-15 i i
94
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Monte Camino III, #421
Strength
ITT
ID:
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Monte Maggiore, #422
Strength
Aprila I, #423
Strength
!A:
D:
The Factory, #424
+10/-10
+15/-15
D:
Strength
+15/-15
+10/-10
Campoleone, #425
casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Casualties
-757=5
+15/-15
{Casualties
+10/-10
+15/-15
'["Casualties
+15/-1$
+10/-10
Strength {Casualties
A:
D:
+10/-10
+15/-15
+10/-10
+15/-15
Campoleone Counterattack, #426
Strength ~~ Casualties
A:
D:
+15/-15
+10/-10
+15/-15
+10/-10
95
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Carroceto, #427
StH^rtgth
lÄ:! 415/-15 I I ID:I +10/-10
Moletta River Defense, #428
Strength
Aprilia II, #429
Strength
A:j +15/-15
D:I +10/-10
Factory Counterattack, #430
A:
ID:
Bowling Alley, #431
Strength
+15/-15
IA:
ID:
Strength
+15/-15
+5/-5
Moletta River II, #432
Strength
ID:I +10/-10
mursTCTn
+15/-15
+10/-10
Casualties
+15/-15
+5/-5
ICasualties
+10/-10
Casualties
T57^5
+15/-15
Casualties
+1B/-1B
+5/-5
{Casualties
jTTT]—+lb/-lb j +lb/-lb
I +10/-10 1 1
96
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Fioccia, #433
I Strength I
casualties
D:
+15/-1B
+5/-5
+15/-15
+5/-5
Santa Maria Infante, #434
I strength ■Casualties
}A.| i i
ID:| +15/-15 ■ i i i
■| +57=5
I +15/-15 I I
San Martino, #435
IA:
ID:
Strength
+15/-15
Castellonorato, #436
Strength
D:
+5/-5
+15/-15
Spigno, #437
Strength
A:
;D:
+5/-5
+15/-15
Formia, #438
Strength
A:
D:
+5/-5
+15/-15
■Casualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
{Casualties
l-^TTS i
I +15/-15
Casualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
Casualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
97
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Monte Grande (Rome), #439
Strength
ATT +5/-5
D: +15/-15
Itri-Fondi, #440
Strength
:A:j +5/-5
D:I +15/-15
Terracina, #441
ID:
Strength
+5/-5
+15/-15
Moletta Offensive, #442
Strength
A:
D: +15/-15
Anzio-Albano Road, #443
IT
D:
Strength
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Anzio Breakout, #444
IT
D:
Strength
+5/-b
+15/-15
Casualties
"T?7^
+15/-15
ICasualties
+B/-5
+15/-15
•Casualties
+B/-5
+15/-15
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö
+15/-15
Casualties
+1Ö/-1Ö—
+15/-15
Casualties
-T!7^5
+15/-15
98
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Cisterna, tW
Strength
A:j 1.5/-5
ID: I -^ISZ-IS
Sezze, #ü46
I Strength
JA:j +5/-5 D:| +15/-15
Velletri, #447
Strength
IA:
ID:
+5/-5
+15/-15
Campoleone Station, #448
Strength
IT
D:
V5/-5
+15/-15
Villa Crocetta, #449
Strength
IA:
ID:
+5/-5
+15/-15
Ardea, #450
"Strength
A:
D:
+10/-10
+15/-15
iuasuaities
I +15/-15
icasualties
'j +5/-5
+15/-15
Öasualiies
+5/-5
+15/-15
{Casualties
57^r j +
I +15/-15 1 1
I Casualties"
+5/-5
+15/-15
Casualties
+10/-10
+15/-15
99
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Fosso dl Campoleone, #451
I S-tren^th
|A:| +57=5
ID:! +15/-15 i i i i
ruasuaities
j"757=5
I +15/-15
Lanuvio, #452
strengtn
IA:
ID:
+5/-5
+15/-15
Casualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
Lariano, #453
IA:
ID:
Via Anziate, #454
Strength
+5/-5
+15/-15 +15/-15
A:
D:
strength
+5/-5'"
+15/-15
casualties
"757=5
+15/-15
Valmontone, #455
Strength iCasualties
IA:
ID:
Tarto-Tiber, #456
+5/-5
+15/-15
+5/-5
+15/-15
Strength
XT]—+1Ü/-10
D:| +15/-15 i i
Casualties
j +lU/-iU
! +15/-15
Casualties 1
"?57=5 1
100
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
II Giogio Pass, #157
1 strength ■Casualties 1 1 1
jA:j +5/-5
|D:| +15/-15 1 1
1 +5/-5 1 1 1 1 +15/-15 1 1 !
St Lo, #458
1 strength i • , ^
[Casualties i 1 1
IA:! ♦SZ-S 1 1 |D:| -7 i i i i
1 +5/-5 1 1 1 1 +15/-15 1
1
Operation "Goodwood," #459
1 Strength Casualties ! i
|A:| +10/-10
ID:! +15/-15 1 1
1 +10/-10 | I
+36 i i i
Operation "Cobra," #460
1 Strength Casualties I i i
|A:! +1Ö/-1Ö ■ i
|D:| +20/-20 i i i i
+1Ö/-1Ö | i i
+20/-20 I 1
Mortain, #461
1 Strength Casualties i i
!A:| +25/-25
jD:| +10/-10
+25/-25 1 •
+5/-5 1 i i
Chartres, #462
1 Strength casualties i
|A:| +5/-5
ID:! +15/-15
+5/-5 1 1
+15/-15 !
101
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Melun, #463
ötrengtn
jA:j 757P5
ID: | +15/-15 i i i i
Seine River, #464
D:
Moselle-Metz, #465
Strength
+15/-15
A:
D:
Strength
+15/-15
Metz, #466
Strength
!A' I !D: I i
+5/-5
+15/-15
Arracourt, #467
Strength
iüasuaities
i
I +15/-15 i i
jCasualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
Casualties
+15/-15
Casualties
-537I5
+15/-15
A:
D:
+25/-25
+10/-10
jCasualties
+5/-5
Westwall, #468
Strength Casualties
im—+b/-b
ID:! 1 1 1 1
+15/-15
• p?57=5—
I +15/-15 1 1
102
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Schmidt, #169
i TTfrengCK" ICasualties 1 1 I
|A:| ♦1Ö/.1Ö
|D:| -25 i i j i
1 +5/-5 1 I +15/-15
I I I I
Seille-Nied, #470
1 Strength i i
Casualties i 1
!A:J +5/-5
|D:| +15/-15 I I
1 +5/-5
+15/-15
■ i
1 1 1
Foret de Chateau-Salins, #471
1 Strength i i
Casualties i
|A:| ♦S/'-S
|D:| +15/-15
+5/-5 j
+15/-15 j
Morhange, #472
1 Strength Casualties i
jA:j +5/-5
|D:| +15/-15 i i
+5/-5 1
+15/-15 1 1
Morhange-Faulquemont, #473
1 Strength i
Casualties ! i i
!A:| +5/-5 i i
|D:| +15/-15 1 1
+5/-5
+15/-15
i
1 1 i i
Bourgaltroff, #474
i Strength i Casualties 1
jA:j +5/-5
|D:| «-ISZ-IS
+5/-5 !
+15/-15 I
103
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Sarre-St. Avoid, #475
I Strength iuasualtles
ITT I ID:
+57=5
+15/-15
Baerendorf I, #476
Strength
|A:
ID:
Baerendorf II, #477
+5/-5
+15/-15
irr
ID:
Strength
+5/-B
+15/-15
Burbach-Durstel, #478
Strength
A:
ID: +15/-15
Durstel-Faerbersviller, #479
Strength
A:
D:
Sarre-Union, #480
+5/-5
+15/-15
I Strength
jA:| +b/-b—
ID:! +15/-15 i i i i
'I +5/-B I I +15/-15
Casualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
{Casualties
+5/-Ö
+15/-15
{Casualties
+5/-5
+15/-15
Casualties
■T57I5
+15/-15
[Casualties
' +b/-b—
I +15/-15
104
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Sarre-Slngling, #481
! strength 1
(Casualties i 1
A: +$/-5
|D:| +15/-15 1 1
+5/-5 j
+15/-15 1 i
Singling-Bining, #482
i strengtn j
casualties i 1
|A:I +5/-5 1 1 |D:| +15/-15 i t i i
+15/-15 1 1
Sauer River, #483
! Strength Casualties ! i
|A:| +15/-15 1 1 |D:| +5/-5 i 1
1 +15/-15 I 1
1 +5/-5 1 1
St. Vith, #484
i strength i
Casualties 1 i
IA: +25/-5B
ID: +10/-10 i i
+25/-25
+10/-10 l
Bastogne, #485
1 Strength Casualties i
IA: | +25/-25
|D:| +10/-10
+25/-25 1
+10/-10 I
Sedan-Meuse River, #486
1 Strength i Casualties i i
|A:| +2,i/-25
|D:| +25/-25
+25/-25 i i i
+25/-25 1 i
105
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Jitra, #487
Strength casualties
ID:
+1Ö/-2B
+10/-25
+2B/-25
+25/-25
Rovno, #488
strength casualties
|A:
ID:
+15/-15
+20/-20
+20/-20
+25/-25
The Defense of Moscow, #489
Strength löasualtles
A:
D:
+15/-15
+20/-20
+20/-20
+25/-25
Soviet Counteroffensive at Moscow, #490
Strength [Casualties
^ö/-2o IA:
ID: +15/-15
+25/-55
+20/-20
The Pogoreloye Gorodishche Offensive, #491
Strength
IT
D:
+2Ö/-2Ö
+15/-15
Casualties
+2Ö/-2Ö—
+20/-20
Leningrad (Operation "Spark"), #492
Strength ICasualties
A: | +2Ü/-2Ü
Dil +15/-15
! +2b/-25
I +20/-20
106
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase I, #493
I Strength ICasuaities
rr D:
+1B/-15
+20/-20 +25/-25
Operation "Citadel," Southern Sector, #494
uasuairies
XT
D:
Strength
+15/-15
+20/-20
" +2Ö/-2Ö
+25/-25
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase II, #495
Strength ICasualties
A:
D:
+15/-15
+20/-20
+20/-20
+25/-25
The Oboyan-Kursk Axis, Phase III, #496
Strength
D:
Prokhorovka, #497
♦15/-15
+20/-20
Casualties
+2Ö/-2Ö—
+25/-25
Strength iCasualties
IA:
D:
+20/-20
+15/-15
+25/-25
+20/-20
Kursk Counteroffensive (Southern Sector), #498
Strength
A:
D:
+20/-20
+15/-15
casualties
+25/-25
+20/-20
107
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Belgorad, #499
IT7! A. ,
istrengtn
ID:| +15/-15 i i
Melitopol, #500
Strength
IA:
ID:
+20/-20
+15/-15
Korsun-Schevchenkovskiy, #501
D:
Strength
+2Ö/-2Ö
+15/-15
Nikopol Bridgehead, #502
Strength
Sevastopol, #503
A:
D:
Strength
+2Ö/-2Ö
+15/-15
rüasuaTCTes"
1 ?&7=& i
I +20/-20 i i
Casualties
+25/-25
+20/-20
Casualties
+20/-20
-Casualties
The Berezina River, Byelorussian Offensive, #504
Strength {Casualties
FT]—+2Ü/-2U
0:1 +15/-15
•j +2b/-2b
I +20/-20 i i
108
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
The Lvov-Sandomierz Offensive, #505
I strengtn
JA:| +2Ö/-2Ö—
juasuaities
! +2Ö/-2Ö—
ID:| +15/-15 I +15/-15
Brody, Phase I, #506
Strength
TTT
D:
+20/-2Ö
+15/-15
Casualties
+2Ö/-2Ö—
+15/-15
Brody, Phase II, #507
Strength {Casualties
A:
D:
+20/-20
+15/-15
+20/-20
+15/-15
Assault Crossing of the Vistula River, Phase I, #508
Strength *"""" 1 Casualties "
D:
T?Ö7-2Ü~
+15/-15
+2B/-25
+20/-20
Vistula River Operation, Pulawy, Phase II, #509
Strength jCasualties
A:
D:
+20/-20
+15/-15
+25/-25
+20/-20
Yassy-Kishinev, #510
Strength
A:
D:
+20/-20
+ 15/-15
Casualties
+25/-25
+20/-20
109
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Vistula-Oder, #511
Strehgth
XT
D: +15/-15
East Prussia, #512
A:
D:
Strength
+20/^0
+15/-15
Ciechanow, Phase I, #513
TT
D:
Strength
+15/-15
Ciechanow, Phase II, #514
Strengffi"
TT
D:
+2Ö/-2Ö
+15/-15
Seelow Heights, #515
Strength
IA:
ID:
+20/-20
+15/-15
Mutankiang, #516
Strength
D:i +20/-20
cistrgrrrra
+2B/-25
+20/-20
ICasualties
+^/-25
+20/-20
Casualties
+25/-^5
+20/-20
iCasualties
+20/-20
ICasualties
+20/-20
+15/-15
ICasualties i i
TT]—+20/-20 j +25/-25
+20/-20
110
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Tarawa-Betio, #517
ITT
ID:
Strength
+5/-5
jCasualtles I TfTn
+5/-5
Iwo Jiraa, Into the Main Defenses, #518
;casuaities Strength
A:! +1Ö/-1Ö
D: +20/-20
+1Ö/-1Ö
+20/-20
Iwo Jima, Suribachi, #519
Strength
!A:
ID:
+10/-10
+20/-20
Casualties'
+10/-10
+20/-20
Iwo Jima, Final Phase, #520
Strength i'Casualtfes
+1Ö/-1Ö
+20/-20
Advance from the Beach, #521
Strength
Advance through the Outposts, #522
Strength """"
A:
D:
-5
+20/-20
Casualties
+5/-5
+20/-20
111
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Tomb Hill-Ouki, #523
Strengtn
IA:
!D:
"=5
+20/-20
luasuaities
-?>r*>
+20/-20
Skyline Ridge-Rocky Crags, #524
Strength ~~~
A:
D:
-5
+20/-20
Casualties
+5/-5
+20/-20
Kochi Ridge-Onaga I, #525
Strength
D: +20/-20
Casualties
"^7=5
+20/-20
Kochi Ridge-Onaga II, #526
Strength
iA:
ID:
-5
+20/-20
[Casualties
-75715
+20/-20
Kochi Ridge-Onaga III, #527
Strength
A:
D:
-15
+20/-20
Casualties
+^-5
+20/-20
Japanese Counterattack, 4-5 May, #528
Strength
IT]—+2Ü/-20
D; I -5 +5/-5
Casualties I
+207-20 1
112
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Kochi Ridge IV, #529
IT
D:
Strength
—15
+20/-20
Casualties
-*5T=5
+20/-20
Shuri Envelopment, Phase I, #530
Strength """""
! IT
ID:
-15
■»•20/-20
jcasualtles 1
i"T57^
I +20/-20
Japanese Counterattack, 24/25 May, #531
Strength jöasualties
A:
D:
+20/-20
-5
I +20/-20
I +5/-5
Shuri Envelopment, Phase II, #532
StrengCF Casualties
irr
ID;
■=?
+20/-20
+5/-5
+20/-20
Shuri Envelopment, Phase III, #533
Strength
A: I -5
D: +20/-20
Casualties
+5/-5
+20/-20
Hill 95-1, #534
Strength
IA:
ID:
-5
+20/-20
{Casualties
+20/-20
113
Hill 95-11, #535 DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
ICaaualtlea •Strength
+5/-5
+20/-20
Yaeju-Dake, #536
Strength
A:
D:
-5
+20/-20
Casualties
+5/-5
+20/-20
Hills 153 and 115, #537
Strength {Casualties
I AT] -5
ID:! +20/-20
+5/-5
+20/-20
Advance from the Beachhead, #538
Strength ~" I Casualties
iA:
ID:
-Dg
+20/-20
+5/-5
+20/-20
Advance to the Shuri Line Outposts, #539
Strength Casualties I
AT] ^5 D:I +20/-20
+5/-5
+20/-20
Kakazu and Tombstone Ridges, #5i»0
I Strength
lArjr-^r ID: ■•■20/-20
| +5/-5
I +20/-20 i i
{Casualties ! ■ i i i
i
114
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Nishibaru Ridge-Tanabaru Escarpment, #541
Strength
A:j -5
D: +20/-20
Casualties
-757^5
+20/-20
Maeda Escarpment, J/542
Strength [Casualties
!A:j -5
ID:; +20/-20
+5/-5
+20/-20
Attack on the Shuri Line's Eastern Flank I, #5^3
Strength Casualties
A:
D:
-5
+20/-20
+5/-5
+20/-20
Attack on the Shuri Line's Eastern Flank II,, #544
Strength
!A:
ID:
-5
+20/-20
Casualties
T?7^
+20/-20
Attack on the Shuri Line's Eastern Flank III, #545
IST
!D:
Strength
-15
+20/-20
Casualties
-75715
+20/-20
Advance to the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #546
Strength
A:
D:
-5
+20/-20
Casualties
+5/-5
+20/-20
115
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Initial Attack on the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #54?
strengtn
D:
T5
+20/-20
Casualties
-7*7=5
+20/-20
Capture of the Yuza-Dake/Yaeju-Dake Escarpment, #548
casualties
IT
D:
Strength
_i5
+20/-20
+5/-5
+20/-20
Jenin, #549
Strength {Casualties
iA:
ID:
+15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
Jerusalem, #550
Strength
in ID:
rr +15/-15
+15/-15
Casualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
Kabatiya, #551
Tilfit-Zababida, #552
Strength
!A:
ID:
+15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
1 Strength Casualties 1 1 1 1 |A:| +15/-15 1 +15/-15 1 i ! i 1 ID:! +15/-15 i +15/-15 I 1 1 - 1 1
luasuaities i
116
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES Nablus, #553
Strength
|A:| +15A15 i i
in«)
i i I I
+15/-15
Rafah, #554
jA. i
!D: i
Strength
+1B/-15
+15/-15
Bir Lahfan, #555
!A:
ID:
Strength
+15/-15
+15/-15
Abu Ageila-Um Katef, #556
Strength
ID: +15/-15
El Arish, #557
lIT
ID:
Jebel Libnl, #558
Strength
+15/-15
+15/-15
Strength
JIT]—+1b/-1b
ID:I +15/-15 i i ■ i
I Casualties
I +15/-15
I +15/-15
{Casualties
Casualties
+1B/-15 ~
+15/-15
Casualties
■+1B/'-15
+15/-15
iCasualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
|Casualties
| n-lbZ-'lb
I +15/-15
117
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Gaza Strip, #559
Strength
A:! +15/-1B'
ID:I +15/-15
Bir Hassna-Bir Thamada, #560
I Strength
jA:| +15/-15
ID:| +15/-15 i i i i
Mitla Pass, #561
Strength
lÄTl +15/-15
ID: +15/-15
Bir Hamma-Bir Gifgafa, #562
Strength
XT
D:
+15/-15
+15/-15
Nakhl, #563
strength
A:
D:
+15/-15
+15/-15
Bir Gifgafa, #56'4
Strength
IA:
ID:
+15/-15
+15/-15
ICasuaities
+1B/-15
+15/-15
Casualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
Casualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
ICasuaities
+15/-15
+15/-15
ICasuaities
+15/-15
+15/-15
'Casualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
118
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Tel Fahar-Banias, #565
I ötrengtn
XT
D: +15/-15
Rawiyeeh, #566
1A: I ID:
Strength
+ 1^-15
•t.15/-15
Zaoura-Kala, #567
TTT
D:
Strength
+1B/-15
+15/-15
Kerama, #568
I strength
I in ^ lD:i +15/-15
Casualties
+1B/-15
■».15/-15
TTasuaities
+15/-15
Casualties
+ 15/-15~'
+15/-15
(Casualties i i,
I ^-30
I +15/-15
I Suez Canal Assault-North, #569
Strength
A:
D:
+15/-15
+15/-15
Casualties
+1B/-15
+15/-15
Suez Canal Assault-South, #570
Strength
ID: |
|
m
+15/-15
I Casualties
jA:j +1b/-15 1 +1b/-lb
I +15/-15
119
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Second Army Buildup, #571
I"" Strength (Casualties
|A:j +1B/-15
ID: | +15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
Third Army Buildup, #572
strength
I XT
ID:
+15/-15
+15/-15
casualties
+1B/-1B
+15/-15
Kantara-Firdan, #573
Strength
!A:
ID:
♦15/-15
+15/-15
Casualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
Egyptian Offensive-North, #571*
Strength
TT +15/-15
+15/-15
'i Casualties
■j +15/-15
I +15/-15 i i
Egyptian Offensive-South, #575
Strength " {Casualties
IA:
ID:
♦15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
Deversoir (Chinese Farm I), #576
Strength TCasualties
A:
ID:
+15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
120
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Deversoir (Chinese Farm II), #577
strength *"""~" iüasuaities
Deversoir West, #578
strengtn
A:
D:
+15/-15
+15/-15
Ismailia, #579
Strength
IA:
ID:
Jebel Geneifa, #580
+15/-15
+15/-15
A:
D:
Strength
+15/-15
+15/-15
Shallufa I, #581
Strength
!A:| +15/-15
ID:| +15/-15
Adabiya, #582
! Strength
ID:| +15/-15 i i i i
+15/-15
+15/-15
casualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
|Casualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
Casualties
+15/-15—
+15/-15
TCasualtles
+ 15/'-15"
+15/-15
iCasualties
jTTT]—+1b/-1b { »IbZ-lb
I +15/-15
121
DATA RELIABILITY ESTIMATES
Shallufa II, #583
I Strength {Casualties i
i
A:j +15/-1B
D:| +15/-15 1 1
j +15/-15
+15/-15 1
1 1
Suez, #584
1' Strength 1
1 Casualties
1 i
1 II:! +15/-15
1 |D:| +15/-15 i i i i
| ♦15/-15
1 +15/-15 i i
! i i
Kuneitra, #585
! Strength ICasualties I 1 1
A:| +15/-15 1
D:| +15/-15 1
1 +15/-15 I I +15/-15
i I i i
Ahmadiyeh, #586
Strength Casualties i 1
A:j +1B/-15
D:| +15/-15 1
+15/-1B |
+15/-15 1 1 1
Rafid, #587
Strength Casualties 1
A:j +15/-15
D:| +15/-15
+15/-15 |
+15/-15 |
Yehudiah-El Al, #588
i i Strength i
i
Casualties i
i i
i
A:| +15/-15 I I
D:| +15/-15 1 1
+15/-15 1
+15/-15 1 1
122
DATA REABILITY ESTIMATES
Nafekh, #589
iirr
ID:
Strength
+15/-15
■».15/-15
Tel Faris, #590
! Strength i
JA:j +1B/-15
ID:I +15/-15 i i
Hushniyah, #591
Strength
AT] +15/-15
D: +15/-15
Mount Hermonit, #592
Strength
ITT
ID:
+15/-15
+15/-15
Mount Hermon I, #593
Strength
!A:
ID: i
+15/-15
+15/-15
Tel Shams, #594
Strength
A:
D:
+15/-15
+15/-15
casualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
iCasualties
I +15/-15
Casualties
"Tf57-f5~"
+15/-15
'Casualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
{Casualties
+15/-15
+15/-15
icasuaities
+15/-15
+15/-15
123
Tel Shaar, #595
1 Strength i
[Casualties ! 1 1
|A:| +15/-15
ID:! +15/-15
1 +15/-15 i
+15/-15 1 •
Tel el Hara, #596
1 Strength i
Casualties i i i
!A:j +15/-15
ID:! +15/-15 | | 1 1
I +15/-15 1
+15/-15 ! i i
Kfar Shams-Tel Antar, #597
1 Strength Casualties 1
|A:| +15/-15 1 1 |D:| +15/-15 i i i i
+15/-15 1
+15/-15 ! 1
Naba, #598
1 Strength Casualties 1 i
|A:1 +15/-15
|D:| +15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
! 1 1 i i
Arab Counteroffensive, #599
! Strength Casualties 1
|A:| +15/-15
|D:j +15/-15
+15/-15 1
+15/-15 1
Mount Hermon II, #600
1 Strength !
Casualties i i i
|A:j +15/-15
|D:| +15/-15 i i
+15/-15 1 i
+15/-15 ! i i
124
Mount Hermon III, #601
Strength 'Casualties
A:
ID:
+15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
+15/-15
125
Task 8; Development of Strength and Attrition Histories for
Selected Battles
The following list contains engagements for which accurate
strength and attrition (S/A) histories may be available for both
participants in the engagement. The estimated number of man-days
required to complete a strength and attrition history for each
engagement is also provided.
Engagement Name and Number
Freiburg, #15 Preston, #26
Est'd Number of Man-days Required for S/A History
Austerlitz, #117 Waterloo, #145 The Alma, #165 Inkerman, #166 First Bull Run (First Manassas), #171 Chancellorsville, #196
Trenton, #85 Princeton, #86 Gettysburg, #199
Bowling Alley, #431 • Via Anziate, #454 * Valmontone, #455 *
The Pogoreloye Gorodishche Offensive, #491 •• The Lvov-Sandomierz Offensive, #505 •• Seelow Heights, #515 »»
3 3
2 2 2 2 2 2
1 1 1
1 1 1
1 1 1
* These engagements are documented only by HERO reports. If the primary sources for data are requested for documentation, two man-days would be required to complete strength and attrition histories for them.
•• These engagements can be documented only by HERO reports. The original sources for data are in Russian.
126
o W
§
EH
S
(0 c 0
•H ■P (1) H 0) Q
»0 C (0
(0
(^ C 0) M
W
\ ro vo o • at o 00
«4-1 • r» ^r r» CH % «
•H CU in p> 0) Q) PS «
(0 00 H r» 0) n 00 in •H <N n n 0)
« •H W ■P a H z id w 3 (M CO w (d a u
O VO <■ VO iH VO VD t^ «N
5 ^ o\ ^< r* 00 rM 00 ^ a\ <N ^t a\ 00 H
D> 00 n ^ 00 Tf r- in C H ^ % fe hi « % <u o vo VO ro in ^ n u H H H es CM CN CM +) w
\ 00 O O 00 o O • N r*
M-l • H 00 CH
•H a 0) 0)
to a>
« •H H •^ Ui •-) U m < 9 H to H id < ul
in M o 00 (N o o O in in t^ a\ (N <N <»• H CM H
to ^^ to 0)
00 vo z~ «* 0) to 4r ^ a u
^ 0) 0 H au H M •d 0 H ^ ux 4J X (0 0) S3 & X u • •
Ui 0)
4J c • • •• SI M M E 0) 0) <u ,*'0 & 0 c id id a) tP +) M-l c ■P 0) w rtlQ
£ in 00 VO vo vo ^ ^ +i ^ vo VO H n vo r- CP en CN o VO ro o 00 c ^ % ^ * % «i * 0) in CM CM H vo vo in M cs CO CO n n ro ro +> W
^ o O O o O o O e o O O o ■H o ro
•H H VO in VO r* o\ 00 EH H o o o o o H
CM P0 *• in vo r» r» >Ji O o o o o o o
o o o o o o o a) H ■H H H H H H •p V ^ ^r ^< ^ ^ ^r rt ^ ^ ^ ^ ^r ^• v a o^ a\ <X\ OS ov <T\ ov
rH rH H H H H H
The date-time group used in this strength and attrition history
is organized exactly like those used for Task 4, i.e., by year, month,
day, and hour. On this table, an entry for strength data represents
the strength of a side at the date and time shown on the same line as
the entry. For example, the attacker's strength at 11:00 AM on 2
October 1944 is 25,345. Entries for casualties and reinforcements/
replacements are for the periods delimited by the dates and times shown
on the lines immediately preceding and following the entries. In this
engagement for example, the attacker incurred 205 casualties and
received 7,128 reinforcements between 11:00 AM on 2 October and 6:00
AM on 3 October.
The following sources were used for strength and casualty data
and for information on the times of the periods of combat activity.
PRIMARY SOURCES;
Official records of US units. These are on deposit at the Federal
Record Center, Suitland, Maryland.
Record Group [RG] 407, 99/12/1.2. G-l Journal and File, 2d Armored Division, Oct 1944.
RG 407, 330-2.1. G-2 Periodic Reports, 30th Division, Sep-Oct 1944.
RG 407, 330-3.0. G-3 After Battle Report, 30th Division, Oct 1944.
RG 407, ARBN-743-3.2. S-3 Journal History, 743d Tank Battalion, 1-31 Oct 1944.
RG 407, TDBN-803-1.2 to 1.13. S-l Journal File, 803d Tank Destroyer Battalion, 1 Oct-30 Nov 1944.
RG-407, TDBN 803-3.2. S-3 Journal, 803d Tank Destroyer Battalion, Oct 1944.
RG 407. Headquarters US XIX Corps, Office of the Commanding General. "Breaching the Siegfried Line," a General Staff analysis of the US XIX Corps* attack and penetration through the Siegfried Line in October 1944, dated 12 Jan 1945.
128
Official Records of German units. These are on microfilm at the US
National Archives, Washington, D.C.
T-314, Roll 1597, Frames 0095-0096. Status Report, 12th Volks Grenadier Division, 1 Nov 1944.
T-314, Roll 1591, Frames 0533-0652. Daily War Diaries, LXXXI Army Corps, 2-7 Oct 1944.
T-314, Roll 1597, Frames 0027-0030. Weekly Divisional Evaluation Reports from LXXXI Army Corps to Seventh Army, 1 Oct 1944 and 7 Oct 1944.
T-314, Roll 1597, Frames 0581-0582. LXXXI Army Corps Strength Reports as of 1 Nov 1944.
T-314, Roll 1597, Frames 0088-0091. Status Report, 246th Volks Grenadier Division, 1 Nov 1944.
T-314, Roll 1597, Frames 0097-0098. Status Report, 341st Assault Gun Brigade, 1 Nov 1944.
Secondary Sources;
Hewitt, Robert L. Workhorse of the Western Front; The Story of the 30th Infantry Division. Washington, D.C, 1946. """
MacDonald, Charles B. The Siegfried Line Campaign. US Army in World War II; The European Theater of Operations. Washington, D.C, 1963.
129
Task 9: Assistance in Eliminating Unwanted Redundancies
HERO has reviewed CAA's efforts to reduce the level of
redundancy in the data base. Our belief is that the redundancy
has not been identified sufficiently to support reduction of the
number of factors based on factor analysis.
The purpose of the data in Table 6 is quite different from
the purpose of the data in Tables 2 and 4. The judgments on the
factors in Tables 2 and 4 indicate the degree to which a
particular factor was present in a battle. The judgments on the
factors in Table 6 indicate the degree to which a particular
factor influenced the outcome of the battle. While the names of
some of these factors are the same in the original data base
report, the judgments reflected in the values assigned to the
factors are different. For example, the terms SURPA and SUPPAA
(the former identified in the original data base as "Surprise" on
Table 2, OPERATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABLES, and the latter
as "Surprise" on Table 6, FACTORS AFFECTING OUTCOME) have been
cited by CAA as an obvious example of redundancy. Yet, the two
factors mean quite different things, as follows:
SURPA is a judgment as to the presence of surprise in
the battle and the degree to which that surprise was present.
SURPAA, on the other hand, is a judgment as to the
effect on the outcome of the battle of the surprise that was
present.
It might be possible to have surprise occurring in a battle
but either not affecting the outcome of the battle, or else
affecting the outcome to a substantially different degree than
130
was judged to be present. An attacker could achieve surprise to
a high degree, but with little or no effect on the outcome of the
battle. In that battle, SURPA would have a high value for the
attacker, but SURPAA would have a low value for the attacker.
The notation for the factors given in the original data base
tends to caase some of this confusion. Of course, SURPAA is
meaningless when SURPA is not present, so there is some correla-
tion between these values and ipso facto some redundancy.
If reduction of the number of redundant factors is desired,
there are several possibilities. However, it would be inappro-
priate, for example, to aggregate weather, season, and terrain
into a single "environmental" variable. Although there is some
superficial validity to this combination because these factors
are related to a degree through physical processes, such an
aggregation may not reduce the number of redundant items of
information. However, this aggregation would have nothing to do
with the adjudged effect of each separate environmental factor on
battle outcome. In one battle, terrain might be highly influen-
tial; in another battle the overcast weather preventing air
support might be crucial. These important judgments would not be
possible with a single factor for environment. Generally, we
believe that reduction in redundancy could create problems of
increased complexity and difficult interpretation.
HERO does not believe that statistical methods alone should
be used to identify unwanted redundancies among the data base
factors. The method that should be used is a combination of
statistical analysis and combat engagement analysis to determine
which factors could be combined without reducing the information
131
available from the data base. That is, the analysis should be
realistic in its treatment of the way in which combat operates.
132