Geospatial readiness Index 2017 - Overview

Post on 22-Jan-2018

253 views 0 download

Transcript of Geospatial readiness Index 2017 - Overview

1

Presenter: Ms. Anamika Das Vice President – Market Intelligence and Business Consulting Ms. Anamika Das holds an M.Phil. in Geography from Delhi School of Economics, Delhi University. She is currently the Vice President of Market Intelligence & Business Consulting wing. She has over 18 years of extensive experience in geospatial field which includes over 6 years experience in primary & secondary research and market analysis.

2

COUNTRIES

GEOSPATIAL

READINESS

INDEX

3

RELEVANCE OF GEOSPATIAL READINESS

High Geospatial Readiness

Enhanced use of Geospatial in all business sectors

because the economy is geo-ready

Sustainable economic growth

and prosperity 4

5

POLL QUESTION Do you see a relevance of geospatial readiness in countries national development goals: a. Yes b. Can’t Say c. No

POLL RESULT Do you see a relevance of geospatial readiness in countries national development goals?

89.47%

10.53% 0.00%

Yes

Can't Say

No

7

SCOPE & BACKGROUND OF STUDY

Countries Geospatial

Readiness Index

Determining pillars, sub-pillars and sub-themes

Conduct Primary and Secondary

Survey

Formulate the readiness score

Identifying 50 countries for the

index

8

COUNTRIES FOR GEOSPATIAL READINESS INDEX

50 Geographically Distributed

countries chosen for Indexing from the following Regions:

Asia-Pacific (APAC)

Europe Americas

Africa & Middle East (AMEA)

75% of world’s population

90% (approx.) of world’s GDP

9

10

PILLARS AND THEIR DETERMINANTS

11

12

POLL QUESTION

Among the four pillars which according to you is the most important in assessing a Countries Geospatial Readiness Index a. Data Infrastructure and Policy Framework b. Institutional Capacity c. User Adoption Level d. Industry Fabric

Among the four pillars which according to you is the most important for assessing a Countries Geospatial Readiness?

64.29%

3.57%

32.14%

0.00% 0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

Infrastructure &Policy

InstituionalCapacity

User AdoptionLevel

Industry Fabric

POLL RESULT

PILLAR I: GEOSPATIAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND POLICY FRAMEWORK

14

PILLAR II: INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY

15

16

POLL QUESTION According to you in measuring Institutional Capacity which of the following sub-determinant plays a major role: a. Business Incubation b. Fundamental Sciences c. Interdisciplinary Courses d. Professional Education

According to you in measuring Institutional Capacity which of the following sub-determinant plays a major role?

POLL RESULT

40%

8%

32%

20%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

Business Incubation Fundamental Sciences InterdisciplinaryCourses

Professional Education

PILLAR III: USER ADOPTION LEVEL

18

PILLAR IV: INDUSTRIAL CAPACITY

19

20

21

22

LEADER UNITED STATES LEADS THE GEOSPATIAL

READINESS INDEX

Key Highlights:

• Rich topographic data sets

• Own earth observation capabilities

• Strong institutional capability

• Strong geospatial industry ecosystem &

user adoption level

• Generated $37 billion in annual revenue

1

Infrastructure & Policy Rank 1

Institutional Capacity Rank 1

User Adoption Rank 1

Industry Fabric Rank 1 23

LEADER UNITED KINGDOM RANKS SECOND IN THE

GEOSPATIAL READINESS INDEX

Key Highlights:

• Location is a key component

• Geospatial adoption in every industry segment

• Abundant universities

• Supportive legal and policy frameworks

• £561 billion worth of economic impact

accredited to the adoption of geospatial

21

Infrastructure & Policy Rank 7

Institutional Capacity Rank 2

User Adoption Rank 2

Industry Fabric Rank 3 24

LEADER THE NETHERLANDS RANKS THIRD IN THE

GEOSPATIAL READINESS INDEX

Key Highlights:

• Rich and diverse scales of topographic and satellite

imagery

• One of the first countries to establish cloud-based

web portal for real-time satellite data access

• Increased geospatial uptake in all industry

verticals

3

Infrastructure & Policy Rank 2

Institutional Capacity Rank 7

User Adoption Rank 3

Industry Fabric Rank 5 25

26

THE MIDDLE GROUND INDIA RANKS AT 23RD IN THE GEOSPATIAL

READINESS INDEX

Key Highlights:

• Tremendous opportunities & enterprising

spirit

• Increased focus on geospatial capacity

building

• Strong service oriented industry fabric

• Weak Geospatial Infrastructure & Policy

23

Infrastructure & Policy Rank 36

Institutional Capacity Rank 15

User Adoption Rank 24

Industry Fabric Rank 19 27

28

Key Highlights:

• July 2016 – initiated the process of setting

up NSDI

• User adoption is presently low

• Very poor industry fabric

49

BEGINNER BANGLADESH RANKS AT 49 IN THE

GEOSPATIAL READINESS INDEX

Infrastructure & Policy Rank 45

Institutional Capacity Rank 47

User Adoption Rank 47

Industry Fabric Rank 50 29

CONTACT US: Ms. Anamika Das

Email: anamika@geospatialmedia.net Twitter: @dasanamika

30