Post on 14-Apr-2018
7/27/2019 First Feeding of Octopus Vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 Paralarvae Using
1/6
Short communication
First feeding of Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 paralarvae using
Artemia: Effect of prey size, prey density and feeding frequency
J. Iglesias , L. Fuentes, J. Snchez, J.J. Otero, C. Moxica, M.J. Lago
Instituto Espaol de Oceanografa, Centro Oceanogrfico de Vigo, Apdo. 1552, 36200 Vigo, Spain
Received 23 June 2006; received in revised form 1 August 2006; accepted 1 August 2006
Abstract
Different assays related to the first feeding of Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 are compiled in this paper. They include: age at
initial feeding age, prey size selection and optimal density, attack timing after feeding, and effect of dose number on the number of
captures. Prey capture and ingestion processes were also analysed. Food supplied was cultured Artemia sp. Each assay lasted
15 min.
Although paralarvae already start to feed on the hatching day (day 0), it is during day 2 when a greater number of attacks is recorded
(81.7 14.7% paralarvae attack). They mainly prefer (significance level =0.05) large Artemia, 1.4 0.4 mm (77.0 5.6% of the total
attacks) than small Artemia, 0.80.1 mm (23.05.6%). There is also a slight predilection for the lowest Artemia concentration (33.3
12.6% paralarvae attack in a 0.1 Artemia ml1 density, opposite 16.77.6 and 18.37.6% in densities of 0.5 and 1 Artemia ml1
respectively). The greatest predatory activity is recorded during the first 5 min after food is supplied (72.225.5%). An increase in the
predatory activity was also observed when food was distributed in several doses instead of a single dose (75.0 10.0% and 46.7 17.6%
respectively). It was proved for the first time that paralarvae completely ingest their preys (including their exoskeletons), in this case
Artemia. Time needed for their total ingestion ranges between 4 and 10 min.
2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Octopus vulgaris; Paralarvae; Artemia; First feeding; Ingestion process
1. Introduction
This work intends to approach the problem of Oc-topus vulgaris paralarval culture, and also to act as a link
between aquaculture and this species biological knowl-
edge, because different gaps still persist regarding their
first developmental stages (Roper et al., 1984).
Several studies have been focused on the octopus
paralarvae rearing. Itami et al. (1963) and Villanueva
(1995) achieved benthic paralarvae for the first time in
Japan and Europe respectively. Iglesias et al. (2002,
2004) and subsequently Carrasco et al. (2003, 2005)closed the octopus culture cycle and achieved adult
octopus from paralarvae cultured in intensive systems.
Diet utilized in all cases consisted ofArtemia and larval
stages of selected crustaceans (Palaemon serrifer, Maja
brachydactyla, and Pagurus prideaux). Nevertheless,
survival rates after the planktonic phase of paralarvae
were very low in general.
Furthermore, a number of diverse prey types and sizes
have been used, often under different feeding regimens
(concentrations, feeding times, and food treatments). As
Aquaculture 261 (2006) 817822
www.elsevier.com/locate/aqua-online
Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 986 49 21 11; fax: +34 986 49 23
51.
E-mail address: jose.iglesias@vi.ieo.es (J. Iglesias).
0044-8486/$ - see front matter 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.08.002.
mailto:jose.iglesias@vi.ieo.eshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.08.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.08.002http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.08.002mailto:jose.iglesias@vi.ieo.es7/27/2019 First Feeding of Octopus Vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 Paralarvae Using
2/6
a result, no standardized methods or protocols exist at the
present for paralarvae rearing. It is globally accepted that
nutrition and feeding behaviour are the most important
factors for paralarval survival. Therefore, in this paper
we deal with items related to first feeding, such as prey
age, size and density, feeding timing and frequency, andcapturing and ingestion behaviour.
There are several previous works related to this
subject, such as Hernndez-Garca et al. (2000), that
concentrates on the evidence that O. vulgaris makes an
external digestion of crustaceans larvae used as a diet,
fact thoroughly verified both for juveniles and adults
(Nixon, 1984; Nixon and Mangold, 1996). Likewise,
Villanueva et al. (1996) presents a detailed description
of the natatory and food searching behaviour of the
planktonic phases of O. vulgaris. Besides, Villanueva
et al. (2002) also deals with the effect of food concen-tration on the proteolytic activity and on the growth of
O. vulgaris paralarvae.
2. Material and methods
The aim of this work was to determine highly re-
markable aspects of first feeding of octopus paralarvae:
age at which feeding starts, selected prey size and den-
sity, attack timing after food supply, effect of the number
of doses, and time to completely ingest preys. Prey
supplied as food was Artemia sp. cultured with Iso-
chrysis galbana Parke (Iglesias et al., 2005).Experiments were made in white plastic cylindrical
tanks (26 cm high and 25 cm in diameter) with a total
volume of 10 l containing 2.5 l of seawater. 20 para-
larvae were introduced in each of them. Water tem-
perature ranged between 18 and 20 C, salinity between
34 and 35, and light intensity in the tank surface was
300400 lx. In any case, paralarvae were starved in
100 l tanks, at a density of 5 paralarvae l1 and a
temperature of 1820 C, until the experiments began.
In the assays carried out to determine age at initial
feeding, 0-, 1-, 2- and 3 day old paralarvae were used.
These were fed on one single dose of 0.5 Artemia ml1
(1.50.0 mm of total length). Triplicates were estab-
lished for each age group. In the other experiments, 2-
day-old paralarvae were used and triplicates were
prepared for each treatment. The prey size selection ex-periment was made feeding paralarvae on a mixture of
small (0.80.1 mm total length) and large (1.40.4 mm
TL) Artemia with a ratio of 0.25 Artemia ml1 for each
size. Ingestion process was determined in paralarvae fed
on a dose of 0.5 Artemia ml1 (1.40.4 mm); contin-
uous observations under binocular magnifier were
carried out to estimate time invested in total ingestion.
Prey density selection was estimated using paralarvae
fed on three different densities of (1.40.1 mm TL)
Artemia (0.1, 0.5 and 1 Artemia ml1). The precise
moment in which attacks on Artemia (1.40.1 mm TL)
took place were calculated taking into account the rightmoment of the attack after the food supply.
Finally, the effect of the number of doses was studied
by supplying a single dose of 0.1 Artemia ml1 (1.6
0.2 mm TL) and the same quantity of Artemia divided
into three doses (minute 0, 5 and 10).
Each experiment lasted for 15 min and started when
food was added to the tank, in which paralarvae had been
previously placed. Though still water was maintained
during the assay, culture medium was gently shacked for
no more than 10 s at 0, 5 and 10 min in order to homo-
genize preys distribution.Each replicate was individually controlled by an
observer, in charge of constantly observing paralarvae
behaviour and score the number of attacks, defined as
the number of paralarvae that attack a prey and keep it in
their arms. For this purpose, paralarvae and prey were
together removed from the tank by a Pasteur pipette to
be observed by binocular magnifier, and the precise
capture time was recorded. Subsequently, neither para-
larvae nor preys were returned to the tank.
At the end of each experiment, in minute 15, every
captured prey was reviewed to describe its morphomet-
ric characteristics or to assess its ingestion degree. In theFig. 1. Average percentage of paralarvae that attack Artemia at eachage (0, 1, 2 and 3 days-old after hatching).
Fig. 2. Average percentage of attacks of 2-day-old paralarvae on Arte-
mia of two different sizes (small=0.80.1 mm; large=1.40.4 mm).
818 J. Iglesias et al. / Aquaculture 261 (2006) 817822
7/27/2019 First Feeding of Octopus Vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 Paralarvae Using
3/6
case of the analysis of prey size selection, observation
was immediately carried out after the capture.
A statistical comparison among the different treat-
ments was carried out by one-way ANOVA (signifi-
cance level =0.05).
3. Results
3.1. Age influence on the number of attacks
Average percentages of prey attacks observed during
the first three days of life of octopus paralarvae are
shown in Fig. 1.
On day 0 hatching dayparalarvae present a scarce
capacity to attack their preys (only 13.35.8% para-
larvae attack). The number of attacks increases gradu-
ally, four-fold in day 1 (50.0 25.2% paralarvae attack),
and the greater number of prey captures is observed
(81.714.7%) in day 2. Nevertheless, if paralarvae are
kept starved one day more i.e. until day 3 a cleardecrease in the number of attacks is detected (47.8
24.4%).
An ANOVA among the number of attacks observed
in the three replicates corresponding to each age,
shows significant differences (pb0.05). Consequently,
future assays were carried out with 2-day-old
paralarvae.
3.2. Selected prey size
When 2-day-old paralarvae were supplied preys
having two different sizes, a clear tendency toward
those having a greater size was recorded (Fig. 2). Larger
Artemia (1.40.4 mm total length) were clearly preferred
(77.05.6%) to smaller Artemia (23.05.6%), showing
significant differences (pb0.05).
The continuous observation of the prey consumption
immediately after the capture, has allowed us to find out
for the first time that, when fed on Artemia, paralarvae
completely ingest it and they do not simply suck up its
internal content. The ingestion process of four para-larvae which completed it is shown in Table 1 (12 over
20 paralarvae attacked, and only the ingestion process of
4 of them could be entirely described).
In general, paralarvae hold their preys by their dorsal
area, and a suction, not only of their internal content but
also their complete exoskeleton takes place; this process
has a length of 4 to 10 min. In Fig. 3 Artemia appendices
(thoracopods) can be observed inside a paralarva di-
gestive tract.
Fig. 3. Stomach content of an O. vulgaris paralarva which has just
ingested an Artemia. Artemia thoracic appendices (thoracopods) canbe observed inside a paralarva digestive tract.
Table 1
Ingestion process of preys in O. vulgaris paralarvae
Half ingestion (min) Total ingestion (min)
Paralarva 1 1 min 59 s 4 min 3 s
Paralarva 2 No data recorded 5 min 20 s
Paralarva 3 2 min 54 s 8 min 54 sParalarva 4 4 min 28 s 10 min 25 s
Fig. 4. Average percentage of 2-day-old paralarvae that attackArtemia
at different densities (0.1, 0.5, and-1 Artemia ml1).
Fig. 5. Average percentage of attacks to Artemia distributed depending
on the observation time fraction (0 to 5, 5 to 10 or 10 to 15 min afterfeeding).
819J. Iglesias et al. / Aquaculture 261 (2006) 817822
7/27/2019 First Feeding of Octopus Vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 Paralarvae Using
4/6
3.3. Selected prey density
In Fig. 4 it can be observed that a greater number of
attacks (33.312.6%) exists at lower densities, 0.1 Ar-
temia ml
1
, than at 0.5 (16.7 7.6%) and 1Artemia ml
1
(18.37.6%), but these differences are not significant
( pN0.05).
3.4. Attack timing after feeding supply
In order to analyse the distribution in time of prey
catches, 2-day-old paralarvae attacks during 15 min,
divided into three consecutive intervals of 5 min starting
after food is provided, are represented in Fig. 5.
It is observed that most attacks (72.225.5%) take
place during the first 5 min, which approximately re-
presents one paralarva attack per minute, while duringthe subsequent time fractions values of 19.4 17.3% and
8.3 14.4% are consecutively recorded; significant
differences exist ( pb0.05) in the number of attacks
among the three fractions analysed.
3.5. Effect of the supply of a single food dose vs three
doses
In Fig. 6 it is observed that if a single food dose is
supplied, the average percentage of paralarvae that at-
tack in the three replicates is 46.7 17.6, while thispercentage considerably increases when three doses are
supplied (75.010.0%). Despite this fact, these differ-
ences were not significant ( pN0.05).
4. Discussion
During day 0 O. vulgarisparalarvae carry out very few
attacks. This may be due to the fact that they are not
physiologically ready to start their exogenous feeding.
The decrease in the number of captures observed at an age
of 3 days in starvation could be interpreted as reaching the
point of no return, after which paralarvae would have
considerably reduced their ability to catch, ingest and
digest their preys. In this work it is evidenced that at an
age of 2 days after hatching paralarvae show their greater
predatory activity. No previous works point out this
appraisal, but the authors obtained the same results using
wild zooplankton captured in the Ra de Vigo as a prey(unpublished data).
It also proved the convenience of using large size
preys (1.4 0.4 mm total length) in the first feeding of
octopus paralarvae. Iglesias et al. (2004); Moxica et al.
(2002) and Hamazaki et al. (1991) also used large size
Artemia specimens; Okumura et al. (2005) pointed out
that using large Artemia strains improves both growth
and survival in intensive rearing of octopus paralarvae.
Even Villanueva et al. (2002) and Carrasco et al. (2003),
who used nauplii for their experiments, indicate that
paralarvae subsequently need a prey having a greatersize; specifically, Villanueva et al. (2002) concludes that
enriched Artemia nauplii seem to be useful only as an
initial diet until a doubling in hatchling weight is
achieved.
In the case of 2-day-old paralarvae, it has been ob-
served that the number of attacks is greater at a prey
density of 0.1 Artemia ml1 than at higher densities (0.5
and 1.0 Artemia ml1), a result different to what could
be expected. An explanation to this fact could be that at
lower densities they can concentrate their attention
better and launch their attacks more effectively. Never-
theless, very different densities have been used to date.For example, Iglesias et al. (2004) used adult Artemia
(14 mm) at 0.050.1 ind ml1 and crustacean zoeae as
a complement; the concentration used by Moxica et al.
(2002) was 0.1 Artemia ml1. In other experiments
higher densities have been used: Villanueva et al. (2002)
worked with densities of 0.2, 2, 4 and 10 nauplii ml1
and recorded the best growth at the highest densities;
Carrasco et al. (2005) used densities of 0.20.8 Artemia
ml1 and Okumura et al. (2005) 2.0 Artemia ml1. As
there is not a general consensus on the optimum prey
density for octopus larval culture (that in any case isrelated to paralarvae density), we suggest that this
parameter, also related to growth and survival, should be
specially considered in future investigations.
The fact that during the first 5 min after food supply
paralarvae are most active, suggests that paralarvae
attacks and captures are stimulated by the first visual
contact with preys. This leads us to think that in the
larval culture of O. vulgaris it is advisable to distribute
the food supply in many doses along the day, instead of
one or two big doses. In fact, it is clearly observed that
immediately after the food dose is supplied, most
paralarvae catch their preys. Nevertheless, after a few
Fig. 6. Average percentage of attacks depending on the fact that food is
supplied in a single dose during the 15 min of the experiment, or in 3
successive doses at 0, 5 and 10 min after food supplies.
820 J. Iglesias et al. / Aquaculture 261 (2006) 817822
7/27/2019 First Feeding of Octopus Vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 Paralarvae Using
5/6
minutes they scarcely show preys in their arms and the
number of attacks considerably decreases.
It has been observed that paralarvae make an external
digestion, at least of decapods larvae, extracting the
zoeae edible content and leaving the exoskeletons
completely empty (Hernndez-Garca et al., 2000). Ac-cording to them, paralarvae administer paralysing agents
on their preys (cephalotoxin), and digestive enzymes
break the muscle joints to make the extraction of the
edible content of exoskeletons easier. However, the
present paper has proved that, when paralarvae are fed on
Artemia, the prey is completely ingested in less than
10 min; therefore it could be possible that, besides the
external digestion, an internal digestion of the Artemia
takes place. The presence of Artemia gills and pieces of
appendices in the digestive systems of octopus paralarvae
has also been mentioned by other researchers (Roo,personal communication). The fact that adult Artemia
shows a thinner exoskeleton (1 m) than other crustacean
zoeae could increase its probability to be ingested.
5. Conclusions and recommendations
O. vulgaris paralarvae already start to feed on the
hatching day, although the number of attacks is very low.
They reach their maximum predatory activity 2 days after
hatching. Therefore, special attention should be paid to
prey size and density during the second day of life.
They preferably select larger Artemia (1.40.4 mmtotal length), instead of small Artemia (0.8 0.1 mm).
Therefore, when considering the establishing of an inten-
sive octopus paralarvae culture it is advisable to use alive
preys having a large size (total length greater than 1 mm).
Prey density producing the greater number of attacks
and captures was 0.1 Artemia ml1, in comparison to
greater densities of 0.5 and 1.0 Artemia ml1. Greater
densities have not produced a greater number of attacks.
Therefore, in order to reduce time and economical costs,
it is advisable to fit the prey quantity to the effective
consumption of paralarvae.During the first 5 min after food supply the greater
activity of attacks and captures in paralarvae is ob-
served. This agrees with the fact that distributing food
into three doses causes a greater number of attacks on
the preys in comparison to when a single dose is sup-
plied. Consequently, in octopus larval culture a supply
of alive food distributed in several doses throughout the
day is recommended instead of one or two daily doses.
Contrary to what is generally accepted, octopus
paralarvae completely ingest all their preys (adult Ar-
temia, in this case), process that takes from 4 to 10 min
to complete.
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the projects PETRI: 1995-
0765-OP and INIA: ACU02-003. We would like to
thank the staff of the aquaculture facilities of the
Instituto Espaol de Oceanografa in Vigo for theircooperation in the experiments carried out.
References
Carrasco, J.F., Rodrguez, C., Rodrguez, M., 2003. Cultivo intensivo
de paralarvas de pulpo (Octopus vulgaris, Cuvier) utilizando como
base de la alimentacin zoeas vivas de crustceos. IX Congreso
Nacional de Acuicultura. Libro de Resmenes, pp. 255256.
Carrasco, J.F., Rodrguez, C., Rodrguez, M., 2005. Cultivo intensivo
de paralarvas de pulpo (Octopus vulgaris, Cuvier 1797), en
tanques parablicos de 30 l utilizando como base de la
alimentacin zoeas vivas de crustceos. IX Congreso Nacionalde Acuicultura. Libro de actas, pp. 191194.
Hamazaki, H., Fukunaga, K., Yoshida, Y., Maruyama, K., 1991.
Effects of marine microalgae Nannochloropsis sp. on survival and
growth on rearing pelagic paralarvae of Octopus vulgaris, and
results of mass culture in the tank of 20 metric tons. Saibai-Giken
19, 7584.
Hernndez-Garca, V., Martn, A.Y., Castro, J.J., 2000. Evidence of
external digestion of crustaceans in Octopus vulgaris paralarvae.
J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U.K. 80, 559560.
Iglesias, J., Otero, J.J., Moxica, C., Fuentes, L., Snchez, F.J., 2002.
Paralarvae culture of octopus (Octopus vulgaris Cuvier) using
Artemia and crab zoeas and first data on juvenile growth up to
eight months of age. Aquac. Eur., vol. 32. European Aquaculture
Society, pp. 268269. Special Publication.Iglesias, J., Otero, J.J., Moxica, C., Fuentes, L., Snchez, F.J., 2004.
The completed life cycle of the octopus ( Octopus vulgaris, Cuvier)
under culture conditions: paralarval rearing using Artemia and
zoeae, and first data on juvenile growth up to 8 months of age.
Aquac. Int. 12, 481487.
Iglesias, J., Lima, J., Lago, M.J., Snchez, F.J., 2005. Tcnica de
engorde de Artemia (Artemia salina, L.1758) hasta los 2 mm de
longitud: tipo de alimento, temperatura de cultivo y densidad
ptima. Poster in: X Congreso Nacional de Acuicultura, 1721
octubre, Ganda. (Valencia, Spain).
Itami, K., Izawa, Y., Maeda, S., Nakai, K., 1963. Notes on the laboratory
culture of octopus larvae. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 29, 514520.
Moxica, C., Linares, F., Otero, J.J., Iglesias, J., Snchez, F.J., 2002.
Cultivo intensivo de paralarvas de pulpo, Octopus vulgaris Cuvier,
1797, en tanques de 9 m3. Bol. Inst. Esp. Oceanogr. 18, 3136.
Nixon, M., 1984. Is there external digestion by Octopus? J. Zool. 202
(3), 441447.
Nixon, M., Mangold, K., 1996. The early life of Octopus vulgaris
(Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in the plankton and at settlement: a
change in lifestyle. J. Zool. 239, 301327.
Okumura, S., Kurihara, A., Iwamoto, A., Takeuchi, T., 2005.
Improved survival and growth in Octopus vulgaris paralarvae by
feeding large type Artemia and Pacific sandeel, Ammodytes
personatus. Aquaculture 244 (14), 147157.
Roper, C.F.E., Sweeny, M.J., Nauen, C.E., 1984. FAO species
catalogue. Vol. 3 Cephalopods of the world. An annotated and
illustrated catalogue of species of interest to fisheries. Fish. Synop.,vol. 3(125). FAO, Rome, pp. 1277.
821J. Iglesias et al. / Aquaculture 261 (2006) 817822
7/27/2019 First Feeding of Octopus Vulgaris Cuvier, 1797 Paralarvae Using
6/6
Villanueva, R., 1995. Experimental rearing and growth of planktonic
Octopus vulgaris from hatching to settlement. Can. J. Fish.
Aquat. Sci. 52, 26392650.
Villanueva, R., Nozais, C., Boletzky, S.V., 1996. Swimming behaviour
and food searching in planktonic Octopus vulgaris Cuvier from
hatching to settlement. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 208, 169184.
Villanueva, R., Koueta, N., Riba, J., Boucaud-Camou, E., 2002.
Growth and proteolytic activity of Octopus vulgaris paralarvae
with different food rations during first feeding, using Artemia
nauplii and compound diets. Aquaculture 205 (34), 269286.
822 J. Iglesias et al. / Aquaculture 261 (2006) 817822