Finding a BETTER Way

Post on 10-Feb-2016

58 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Finding a BETTER Way. A Program to Facilitate Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care . Donna Manca, Carolina Aguilar, Kami Kandola , Kris Aubrey- Bassler , Denise Campbell-Scherer, Nicolette Sopcak , Christopher Meaney , - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Finding a BETTER Way

1

Finding a BETTER Way

Donna Manca, Carolina Aguilar, Kami Kandola, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Denise Campbell-Scherer, Nicolette Sopcak, Christopher Meaney,

Julia Baxter, Melanie Heatherington, and Eva Grunfeld

CPHA Conference Toronto - May 27, 2014

A Program to Facilitate Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care

2

www.better.utoronto.ca

Acknowledgements & Disclaimer

Production of this presentation has been made possible through a financial contribution from Health Canada, through the Canadian Partnership Against

Cancer.

The views expressed herein represent the views of the BETTER 2 Coalition and do not necessarily represent the views of the project funders.

3

www.better.utoronto.ca

Background• Primary care is an ideal setting for most chronic disease

prevention and screening (CDPS) activities

• Evidence-based tools and strategies are inconsistently applied• It would take an additional 7.4 hours/day to address prevention1

• Plethora of guidelines - many lack rigor,2 conflicting guidelines confuse primary care providers

• Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Primary Care (BETTER) - informed by the Chronic Disease Framework – developed and tested effective approach to CDPS

1. Yarnall KS, Pollak KI, Ostbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? American journal of public health 2003;93:635-41.

2. Graham ID, Beardall S, Carter AO, et al. What is the quality of drug therapy clinical practice guidelines in Canada? CMAJ 2001;165:157-63.

4

www.better.utoronto.ca

The BETTER Trial• Setting - 8 Primary Care Teams (PCTs)• Two interventions• Patient Level Intervention: Prevention Practitioner

(PP), 1 per PCT• Prevention visits with individual patients, prepare

prevention prescription tailored to each patient• Practice Level Intervention: Practice Facilitator (PF), 1

per 4 PCTs• Enable EMR (invitation letters, audit and feedback,

decision support), “prevention prescriptions” tailored to the circumstances of each PCT

• Patient level (PP) intervention - most effective BETTER 2 Program (expansion & deepen impact)

5

www.better.utoronto.ca

The BETTER Trial Results

Grunfeld E, Manca D, Moineddin R, Thorpe KE, Hoch JS, Campbell-Scherer D, Meaney C, Rogers J, Beca J, Krueger P et al: Improving chronic disease prevention and screening in primary care: results of the BETTER pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial. BMC family practice 2013, 14(1):175.

6

www.better.utoronto.ca

Objectives of the BETTER Program

• Overall Objective of the BETTER:• Improve CDPS in the primary care team setting for: heart

disease, diabetes, & cancers including their associated lifestyle risk factors

• Integrated knowledge translation - research, practice & policy

• Desired long-term goals of the BETTER:• Improved clinical outcomes• Reduced burden of chronic disease• Improved sustainability of the health care system through

improved CDPS in primary care

7

www.better.utoronto.ca

BETTER 2 ProgramTarget Audiences

• Patients at risk for chronic disease: adults aged 40 – 65, a population eligible for most CDPS maneuvers• Increased knowledge, self-management & access to CDPS

resources

• Primary care providers, researchers and policy makers: To improve CDPS in adults aged 40-65 • Develop comprehensive source of tools and transform

practice through a patient-level intervention using practice facilitation via a patient level intervention by a health care professional within the practice (PP)

• Primary Care Groups and Organizations:• Facilitate change by dedicating resources (e.g. PPs) to CDPS

8

www.better.utoronto.ca

The Prevention Practitioner – A New RoleTargets both at risk populations & individual patients

Manca DP, Greiver M, Carroll JC, et al: Finding a BETTER way: A qualitative study exploring the prevention practitioner intervention to improve chronic disease prevention and screening in family practice. BMC family practice 2014, 15(1):66.

9

www.better.utoronto.ca

Guideline Harmonization through Integrated Knowledge Translation

Clinicians, Researchers & Policy Working Together

Campbell-Scherer D, Rogers J, Manca D, Lang-Robertson K, Bell S, Salvalaggio G, Greiver M, Korownyk C, Klein D, Carroll JC et al: Guideline harmonization and implementation plan for the BETTER trial: Building on Existing Tools to Improve Chronic Disease Prevention and Screening in Family Practice. CMAJ Open 2014, 2(1):E1-E10.

10

www.better.utoronto.ca

Spaghetti DiagramBETTER Developed Tools to Address the Modifiable Risk Factors

Haydon E, Roerecke M, Giesbrecht N, Rehm J, Kobus-Matthews M. (2006, March). Chronic disease iOntario and Canada: Determinants, risk factors and prevention priorities: Summary of full report. Prepared

for the Ontario Chronic Disease Prevention Alliance & the Ontario Public Health Association. Availablefrom: http://www.ocdpa.on.ca/docs/CDP-SummaryReport-Mar06.pdf

11

www.better.utoronto.ca

Preparing for a Prevention VisitThe Health Survey is filled in by patients before the visit and includes tools to capture a detailed prevention and screening history including risks such as• Smoking• Exercise • Diet• Alcohol• Family History

An assessment of• Readiness to change

12

www.better.utoronto.ca

Prevention Visit FormExtracts information from the patients’ surveys, health record and physical measures to determine eligible CDPS maneuvers & develop an approach informed by the individuals’ risks (lifestyle, family history, etc.)

13

www.better.utoronto.ca

14

www.better.utoronto.ca

Algorithm

15

www.better.utoronto.ca

16

www.better.utoronto.ca

Prevention Prescription

17

www.better.utoronto.ca

Program EvaluationRE-AIM

Evaluation of Effectiveness & Sustainability:• REACH • Representativeness & proportion participating

• EFFECTIVENESS • Impact on outcomes including a composite index of met/eligible

outcomes

• ADOPTION in different settings

• IMPLEMENTATION • Adaptations and how the intervention was delivered

• MAINTAIN the approach• How BETTER is adapted and maintained in different settings• Time and cost of the intervention will be captured

18

www.better.utoronto.ca

Questions?

19

www.better.utoronto.ca

20

www.better.utoronto.ca

21

www.better.utoronto.ca

BETTER 2 Logic model

22

www.better.utoronto.ca

BETTER Tools