Figure 1 HMS Victory Body Plan [3] - Eprintseprints.soton.ac.uk/42999/2/trafalgar_figuresv3.pdf ·...

Post on 02-Jul-2018

565 views 29 download

Transcript of Figure 1 HMS Victory Body Plan [3] - Eprintseprints.soton.ac.uk/42999/2/trafalgar_figuresv3.pdf ·...

Figure 1 HMS Victory Body Plan [3]

Figure 2 Coffin diagram for estimating longitudinal weight distribution

-2.50

-2.00

-1.50

-1.00

-0.50

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

GZ/ m

HeelA

ng

le/ d

eg

GZ Curve Linear GZ

GMT = 2.202 m

Figure 3 Estimated GZ curve for fully laden HMS Victory

Figure 4 CNC machining of Victory model

y = 11119x4

- 5141.9x3

+ 728.15x2

- 21.485x

-2.00

-1.00

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

FN

CR

x10

-3

Figure 5, 6 Upright fully loaded residuary resistance curve

y = 83.238x + 1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07Leeway Angle

2(rad

2)

CR

/(C

R,

0 l

ee

wa

y)

Figure 6,7 Influence of leeway angle squared on increase of residuary resistance

y = 1.8188x + 1

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4

CL2x10

-3

CR

/(C

R,

0 l

ee

wa

y))

Figure 7,8 Variation in CR/CR0 with square of CL at FN = 0.17

y = -200.22x + 31.855

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08

Leeway Angle (rad2)

Dis

tan

ce t

o C

en

tre o

f Late

ral E

ffo

rt F

orw

ard

fro

m L

CG

(%

L)

Figure 8, 9 Position of Centre of Lateral Resistance Compared to Leeway Angle Squared

y = 9.4935x - 0.9593

-10.000

-8.000

-6.000

-4.000

-2.000

0.000

2.000

4.000

6.000

8.000

-1.000 -0.800 -0.600 -0.400 -0.200 0.000 0.200 0.400 0.600 0.800 1.000

a

CLx

10

-3

Figure 9, 12 Influence of rudder angle on sideforce

y = 88.54x + 9.3286

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07

Leeway Angle2/rad

2

dC

/dat

= 0

La

a

Figure 10 Variation in LC α∂ ∂ Over a Range of Leeway Angles

(a) In workshop

(b) Downwind in wind tunnel Figure 11,14 Photographs of model of HMS Victory

y = -0.0013x2

+ 0.1209x - 1.1444

y = -0.0008x2

+ 0.0663x + 0.5674

y = -0.0008x2

+ 0.0936x - 0.6103

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Sail angle of incidence (degrees)

CL

Fore topsail Main topsail Mizzen topsail Poly. (Fore topsail) Poly. (Main topsail) Poly. (Mizzen topsail) Figure 12, 15 Top sail CL vs α

y = -8E-08x3

- 0.0002x2

+ 0.0566x + 0.0793

y = -3E-05x3

+ 0.0031x2

- 0.0643x + 0.7024

y = 5E-06x3

- 0.0012x2

+ 0.1148x - 0.8899

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

Sail angle of incidence (deg)

CD

Fore topsail Main topsail Mizzen topsail Poly. (Main topsail) Poly. (Fore topsail) Poly. (Mizzen topsail) Figure 13, 16 Top sail CD vs α

Figure 14, 17 Blender Texture Map of HMS Victory

Rendering

Engine

(Ogre)

Ship Plugin

Fleet

Network

Layer

Sound

EngineAI

GUI

(CEGUI)

Ocean

«uses»

«uses»

«uses»

«uses»

«uses»

«uses»

«uses»

«uses»

«uses»

Figure 15 18 Overall software architecture

Figure 16 Views of Battle of Trafalgar

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

Time (Seconds)

Sp

eed

(kn

ots

)

Figure 17 20 Time Trace of Forward Speed when Heading Downwind

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00

Time (Seconds)

Le

ew

ay

An

gle

(D

eg

ree

s)

Figure 18 21 Time Trace of Leeway when Heading at 150o to the True Wind

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

0

45

90

135

180

225

270

315

Sail Braced Square Sails Braced at 45 Degrees Sails Braced at 15 Degrees

Figure 19 22 Speed Polar Plot for HMS Victory with Yards Set at different angles