Post on 07-Apr-2018
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
1/42
RESTRICTED
TOWARDS A FEDARAL STATE AND A POLITICAL SOLUTION FOR THE
CONFLICT IN SRI LANKA
Federal' is a somewhat sensitive word in this island devolution' on the other hand seems
more acceptable.
INTRODUCTION
1. Federalism is the theory or advocacy of federal political orders, where final authority
is divided between sub-units and a center. Unlike a unitary state, sovereignty is
constitutionally split between at least two territorial levels so that units at each level have
final authority and can act independently of the others in some area. Citizens thus have
political obligations to two authorities. The allocation of authority between the sub-unit and
center may vary, typically the center has powers regarding defense and foreign policy, but
sub-units may also have international roles. The sub-units may also participate in central
decision-making bodies. Much recent philosophical attention is spurred by renewed political
interest in federalism, coupled with empirical findings concerning the requisite and legitimate
basis for stability and trust among citizens in federations. Philosophical contributions have
addressed the dilemmas and opportunities facing Canada, Australia and Europe, to mention
just a few areas where federal arrangements are seen as interesting solutions toaccommodating differences among populations divided by ethnic or cultural cleavages yet
seeking a common political order.
2. Most of the countries are threatened by a new upsurge of ethnic nationalism. Ethnic
rivalry has now acquired a new and vitally important dimension in the crisis of Sri Lanka.
The nature of the ethnic strife in Sri Lanka, as in other parts of the world, is a part of the same
world phenomenon of the desire of the ethnic group to achieve either supremacy or equality.
3. Since the 1990s ethnic violence within states has become much more common than
interstate violence and tends to be harder to stop, leading to the question, how states can
avoid ethnic violence and best accommodate multiple ethnicities within their boundaries.
RESTRICTED
1
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
2/42
RESTRICTED
4. The problem in Sri Lanka, therefore, is to make the State a nation as the former now
consists of segmental polities with different loyalties. The aim of this study, therefore, is to
seek an investigation into competing demands and responses in order to straighten the issue
with a view to finding a durable solution to the ethnic conflict which, within two decades, has
totally de- stabilized the country. The conflict in the last decade, involved physical violence,
and it began to escalate with the growth of competing demands of the two major ethnic
groups. The nature of the relationship between the conflict and violence is complex, and it
has escalated largely because of the perception that politicized ethnicity needs to be linked
with a struggle for national liberation.
4. The evolution of Sri Lankas ethnic conflict can be likened to a snowball rolling down
a hill. At the beginning it is small, but as time passes, it develops a momentum of its own,
becomes larger and more complex, absorbs other elements, thereby making it more difficult
to respond to. Sri Lankas ethnic conflict has evolved from one based on questions of
representation, grievances based on discrimination and language to a demand for
decentralization to autonomy to devolution. More recently the focus has been on Tamil
aspirations including nationhood, self-determination and confederation.
6. The negotiation process between the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) has reached a new stage with the agreement in Oslo to settle
the ethnic conflict through a federalist solution. In the light of the history of the ethnic
conflict and the debate on its possible settlement, this can be seen as a major breakthrough,
both from the side of the LTTE as well as the Sri Lankan government. The peace talks and
the process of negotiating a settlement of the 20 year old ethno- political war in Sri Lanka
will require ideas for the reformation of the political system of Sri Lanka, which are suitable
to accommodate the interests and grievances of the two conflict parties as well as other
identify groups, like the Muslim community.
RESTRICTED
2
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
3/42
RESTRICTED
7. As a result of above, the liberals of major ethnic groups have seen federalism as a
viable solution to Sri Lankan context as in many countries in the world with diversified
ethnic communities.
HYPOTHESIS
8. Federalism can be seen, as the only alternative one can perceive as the optimum
solution to the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
9. Oslo Peace Talks GOSL & LTTE. The 1 statement issued in Oslo by the Royal
Norwegian Government at the conclusion of the third session of peace talks between the
GOSL and the LTTE on December 05, 2002 read as follows,
Responding to a proposal by the leadership of the LTTE, the parties agreed to explore a
solution founded on the principle of internal self- determination in areas of historical
habitation of the Tamil- speaking peoples, based on a Federal structure within a united Sri
Lanka. The parties acknowledged that the solution has to be accepted to all communities
10. The above statement bears testimony to the timely need of search for a solution within
the meaning of federalism.
11. Oslo Statement. Some 2 of the important decisions reached at the third round of talks
held in Oslo Norway from 2-5 December 2002 to the final round held in Japan are as follows:
a. Explore a solution founded on the principle of internal self deter ministration
in areas of historical habitation of the Tamil speaking peoples based on a federal
structure within a united Sri Lanka.
1Sri Lanka Etnic Problem & Solutions -By Mr Lionol Guruge
2Sri Lanka Etnic Problem & Solutions -By Mr Lionol Guruge
RESTRICTED
3
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
4/42
RESTRICTED
b. Establishment of a northeast reconstruction fund.
c. LTTE in partnership with UNICEF to draw up an action plan for restoring
normalcy to the lives of children (Since the Sub-Committee on prevention of Disputes
in High Security Areas and Restoring of Normalcy had been rendered inactive, the
LTTE decided to leave the committee)
d. Immediate establishment of U.N. Fund for the reconstruction of the eastern
province and World Bank being recommended as its custodian.
e.
Invite Amnesty International ex-Secretary General, Ian Martin to initiate on
human rights in the context of the peace move.
f. LTTE undertook to abandon conscription of children soldiers.
g. The two parties mutually agreed to reactivate the Committee on Ceasefire
Agreement and prevent confrontation in the seas after the Sri Lankan Navy destroyed
a trawler suspected to be an LTTE craft transporting arms.
h. LTTE expressed its dissatisfaction over the governments decision to hold
local government elections in the north- eastern provinces.
CHAPTER ONE
RESTRICTED
4
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
5/42
RESTRICTED
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF THE ETHNO- POLITICAL CRISIS IN SRI
LANKA
12. The malfunction of the provincial Councils scheme, which, in fact, had quite a few
features of a quasi-federal scheme of government, and the resumption of military operations
against the Tamil separatists have prejudiced a certain part of the political opinion in the
country to observe the option of introducing a federal system of government for Sri Lanka.
The Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF), which discarded the idea of federalism in 1972,
has renewed its demand for a federal state and a few minor parties have begun to discuss the
federal status as a solution to the ethnic issue. India seems to support the idea, and the Indian
analysts considered the provincial Councils scheme as a basis, which eventually could pave
the way for a federal status. The proposal for a federal scheme of government, as all previousattempts at such a solution, is specific to be disruptive in Sri Lanka and the manifestations of
such a controversy has already begun.
13. The representatives 3 of Kandyan interests demand for a federal state was first made
before the Donoughmore Commission in 1929. The Kandyan National Assembly, which was
an elite political organization consisting of the traditional upper-class elements of the
Kandyan Sinhalese, went before the Donoughmore Commission and demanded federal status
for the Kandyan areas. They placed a document titled Detailed Proposals for the Reform of
the constitution before the Donoughmore Commission and demanded the division of the
country into three different states:
3Devolution and Development in Sri Lanka 1994 Welikala, Asanga- (Discussion Paper)
3Devolution and Development in Sri Lanka 1994 Welikala, Asanga- (Discussion Paper)
a. One state for the Kandyan areas;
b. Second state for the low country Sinhalese areas.
c. The third state for the Tamil provinces.
RESTRICTED
5
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
6/42
RESTRICTED
14. The Kandyan National Assembly, on the basis of this division, wanted the Kandyan
state to be given recognition as a national unit, and it was to consist of the five provinces:
Central, North Central, North Western, Uva and Sabaragamuva Provinces. This was
primarily a strong appeal for self- government for their provinces to which they claimed are
entitled under the Kandyan convention of 1815.
15. The Kandyan 3 claim for a separate state was again revived in 1944 before the
soulbury Commission, which, as its predecessor, rejected the demand on the ground that the
need of the situation is to rise above differences of community They, however, thought that
a scheme of provincial councils as an extension of local government would provide
favorable opportunities for the Kandyan provinces to undertake programmes of rehabilitation
and development. This showed that the colonial authorities never considered a federal system
of government as an alternative applicable to the conditions of the island. The then existing
socio- economic conditions and the level of ethnic division provided no basis for such a
scheme of government.
16. It was at this time that the late Pri Minister Mr S.W.R.D Bandaranaike began
discussing the applicability of the federal system of government for Sri Lanka. Since his
views on this subject, the present day advocates of federalism to find a justification for the
demand have used which he expressed at the beginning of his political career and they
deserve to be examined in detail. This is relevant to the current discussion in the country.
Bandaranaike, speaking on the subject federation as the only solution to our political
problems (1926), discussed the applicability of the federal model of government. His views
were endorsed by the Kandyan National Assembly, which demanded a separate State for the
Kandyan provinces.
17. Bandaranaike framed his ideas on the question of federalism in the broad context of
constitutional reforms; in other words, he referred to an alternative scheme of government
that deserved consideration. Basing his arguments on the islands unique experience in the
RESTRICTED
6
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
7/42
RESTRICTED
ancient past, he stated, There were two forms of government in the island- the ancient
system of land tenure and the Headman system of provincial administration. Under this
system of government, the country remained divided into various units up to the level of the
Gamsabhawa - the village council composed of the head of each family in the village.
Bandaranaike saw this structure of both the social and political organization as a form of
loose federation bound by one common oath to the King This form of government
disappeared with the establishment of a centralized administration by the British and this, as
Bandaranaike stated, was a bureaucratic from of government.
18. Federal Demand. The4 need for a federal solution to the Sri Lankan problem of
majority- minority relations surfaced with the formation of the Federal party in December
1949, and at the very inception itself, it designated itself as the Federal Freedom party of the
Tamil- speaking people of Ceylon. The aim of the Federal party, as has been authenticated
by professor A.J Wilson, was to advocate the formation of a Ceylon Tamil State, and it,
therefore, appealed to the nationalism of the Tamil people with a view to rousing them on the
basis of the recognition of the existence of a separate Tamil Kingdom in the North of Sri
Lanka, before the coming of the Portuguese in the Sixteenth century There were attempts, at
the very initial stage of the formation of the Federal party, to think in terms of separate
statehood with a view to federating with India.
19. This, however, was not pursued because of the probable reaction of the Sinhalese
majority in the country but the design was to enter into a larger Dravidian Sovereign State of
4Welikala, Asanga- Democratization and Conflict Resolution: The Rationale for Federalizing Sri Lanka
4Welikala, Asanga (Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA)Fiscal and Financial Arrangements in A Federal Sri Lanka
ISBN-955-8037-58-3
South India. This, undoubtedly, created a perception of fear among the Sinhalese who,thereafter, perceived the federal formula as a part of a wider strategy to form a Dravidian
state in south India. Yet another perception of the Sinhalese was that concessions on
federalism could lead eventually to a demand for a separate state, and therefore, they were
RESTRICTED
7
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
8/42
RESTRICTED
not prepared to extend any concessions to the Tamil community. The Federal party, taking
the fears of the Sinhalese as well as the reactions of India into consideration, adopted the
federal demand with out seriously damaging the unitary principle or providing undue
encouragement to Tamil separatism. The Federal party took the view that the problems they
faced as a linguistic (Language) minority in Sri Lanka flow from the unitary character of the
Constitution, and therefore advocated the conversion of the present Constitution of Sri Lanka
from a unitary one to a federal one. The argument was that a unitary state established in the
context of ethnic diversity couldnt consolidate itself as a new independent state. The Federal
party therefore called upon the Tamil people to agitate for the replacement of the present
unitary constitution by a federal type of constitution and for the creation of an autonomous
Tamil state carved out on a linguistic basis within the framework of a Federal Union.
20. The Federal party advocated an autonomous Tamil linguistic state within the
framework of a federal union of Sri Lanka and it, they argued, was the only rational and
proper constitution for a bi-lingual country. They also wanted the adoption of a federal
constitution to give recognition to the right of self- determination. This indicated that the
basis demand of the Federal party has always been federalism though a fairly large section of
the Tamil people themselves were not in favor of federalism. But they utilized the language
issue in the post- 1956 period to support the opinion in favor of federalism.
21. Political Demands /Ethnic Tensions. The ethnic tensions developed over a period of
time though they heightened post independence. Although at the time of independence
Ceylonese raised a collective voice for liberation from the British and a series of subsequent
events lead to a deterioration of ties between the Sinhala and Tamil leaders. One such
development was the transformation of the electoral system from a communal to a territorial
one thereby putting the majority community in a politically advantageous position. Some of
the other political and constitutional developments that contributed to the deterioration of ties
were the infamous Official Languages Act of 1956, land colonization schemes for Sinhalese
in the North and East of the country and education policies introducing quotas which
restricted access to education and employment opportunities for minorities.
RESTRICTED
8
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
9/42
RESTRICTED
22. Consequent5 to such discriminatory policies by the majoritarian state the Tamil
politicians agitated and put forth their demands to rectify the situation. Although the
subsequent government responded in the form of the Official Languages (Special provisions)
Act of 1958 and designing proposals for devolution of power, lack of political will on the part
of the state resulted in the non- implementation of the remedial steps. Of such steps the
proposals for devolution of power demands discussion. Talks between Bandaranaike-
Chelvanayagam (1957) and Dudley Chelvanayagam (1965) among other issues focused on
the devolution of power to the regions. However neither the regional councils did not suggest
in the first agreement nor the district councils worked out in the second saw the light of day.
23. At the Bandaranaike- Chelvanayagam talks a regional council system was worked outin detail. The North and East were to have two separate areas but these councils had powers
to work together for specific purposes of specific interest. The regional councils were to be
vested with such powers as land and land development, colonization, fisheries, water
schemes etc. With regard to finances for the councils, the council was to have powers to tax
and borrow while being entitled to a block grant from the central government.
24. Despite repeated requests and as no substantial remedies were affected by the
government Tamil youth took to arms to win their demands. It was at a crucial moment of
this armed conflict that the 13th Amendment to the constitution was made under pressure
from India. However it was a failure in response to the political demand. In short the failure
5 Section2, Part B, Bandaranaike-Chelvanayagam Pact of 1957
of the system could be attributed to four factors, Structural deficiencies inherent in the
system, lack of political will, the Centralist mentality among the implementing personneland bureaucratic incompetence. Some of the structural deficiencies are the restrictive
constitutional framework, which undermines the devolution exercise, the ambiguous
concurrent list that gives opportunity to the central government to seize devolved powers and
RESTRICTED
9
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
10/42
RESTRICTED
vesting authority on the central government to formulate national policy on all matters
including those devolved. Such provisions provided opportunity for both the politicians and
the bureaucrats to exploit the system for the advantage of the central government. To add to
these obstacles emerge from within the system, opposition to the 13th amendment came from
all sections of society including some segments of the government, the opposition political
parties, the JVP and the LTTE.
25. 13th Amendment . Provincial6 councils were set up under the Indo- Sri Lanka Peace
Accord of 1987. This gave expression to the notion that Sri Lanka is a multi-ethnic and
multilingual plural polity. It was also conceded that every ethnic community has its own
special cultural and linguistic identity and the northern and eastern provinces were traditional
homelands of the Tamil-speaking people of Sri Lanka where they lived in unison with other
ethnic communities. Although the 13th amendment failed to give effect to the full devolution
of powers to the periphery, Dr. Shirani Bandaranaike held the view that the powers devolved
on the provincial councils in Sri Lanka far exceed those enjoyed by the Indian states under
the Indian constitution. Powers devolved on the provincial councils under the 13 th amendment
are contained in three lists as fols:
a. Provincial list (List No. 01), which includes decentralized items.
b. Central government list (List No. 02) items retained with the central
government
6Sri Lanka Etnic Problem & Solutions By Mr Lionol Guruge Centre for Policy Alternatives
6 Edirisinha, Rohan- (Discussion Paper) Federalism: Myths and Realities
c. Concurrent list (List No. 03) According to section 154 G (5)(b) of the 13th
amendment although the provincial councils may make laws with respect to any
matter in the concurrent list, it has to be done in consultation with the parliament. Butthe procedure to be followed has not been explained in the constitution. Section 154 G
(6) states:
RESTRICTED
10
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
11/42
RESTRICTED
i. If any provision of any statute made by a provincial council is
inconsistent with the provisions of any law made in accordance with the
preceding provisions of this Article the provisions of such law shall prevail
and the provisions of such statute shall to the extent of such inconsistency be
void. Accordingly all matters contained in the concurrent list are subject to
parliamentary control According to 154 G (2).
ii. No provincial council matter should become law unless such matter is
passed by 2/3 majorities in parliament According to 155 (3) (a)
iii. The emergency regulations brought into force under the Public
Security Act shall have the power to supersede, amend or suspend the
operation of the Provincial Council Act.
iv. The 13th amendment outlines the devolution of powers for provincial
councils but conflicts have arisen between the central government and the
provincial councils in the actual implementation of the provisions.
v. The northeast provincial council due to a variety of reasons has
become inoperative whilst all other provincial councils are in operation.
26. It was only under the 13th amendment that statutory provision was made for
devolution of power to the periphery through the establishment of provincial councils. It was
historic to have created near federal administrative structure in Sri Lanka, which continued to
remain a unitary state.
27. The failure of this attempt at devolution and resolution of the conflict lead the PA
government to embark on the constitution reform project 1994-2000. The key features of this
attempt that need mention are the removal of article 2 and article 76 of the present
constitution that stand in the way of meaningful devolution. Although all of the proposals fell
short of carrying the word federal the deletion of the unitary label in itself was seen as a
progressive step forward. In the proposals Sri Lanka was introduced as an inseparable union
of Regions and subsequently as consisting of the center and regions. To pacify those who
feared the effect of deleting the unitary clause, a number of provisions were included to
RESTRICTED
11
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
12/42
RESTRICTED
protect the unity and safeguard the territorial integrity of the country. These proposals carried
two lists (Reserved list setting out the subjects coming under the center and Regional list,
listing the subjects vested in the Regions. There was no concurrent list) specifying the
subjects coming under each authority. Some of the glaring shortcomings of the project were
the absence of a mechanism for regional representation at the center, mechanism to deal with
disputes between center and regions and between regions, continuation with the subordinate
nature of the regions to the center. Just like its predecessors amidst political disagreements
the project was completely abandoned due to both substantive and procedural defects.
28. The PA Government-LTTE Negotiations. The new government took immediate The
parliamentary election of 16 August 1994 was narrowly won by the People's Alliance (PA), a
coalition of centre-left, left and minority-based parties dominated by the SLFP. Having
campaigned on a peace platform steps to initiate dialogue with the LTTE. In response to the
peace-making overtures of the new government, the LTTE indicated its compliance to re-
enter peace talks for the first time since 1990.
29. Starting7 in October 1994, four rounds of talks were held in Jaffna between
government teams of varying composition led by the Secretary to the President, Mr. K.
Balapatabandi and a four-member LTTE delegation led by Mr. S. P. Tamilselvan. All the
talks were supplemented, and effectively driven, by an exchange of over 40 letters between
the president and her representatives and the LTTE.
7http://www.c-r.org/accord/sri/accord4/acc_18_4_95.shtml
7Government strategies for war and peace in Sri Lanka 1994-98- Kumudini Samuel
30. The first three rounds of talks yielded some results, notably the cessation of hostilities
and an easing of the government's economic embargo on Jaffna. During this period, however,
it soon became apparent that the government and the LTTE had fundamentally different
agendas. The government wanted to negotiate simultaneously guidelines for a formal
ceasefire, a programme of reconstruction and rehabilitation for the war-ravaged north and
east and a political package to solve the ethnic conflict. The LTTE, meanwhile, required a
RESTRICTED
12
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
13/42
RESTRICTED
step-by-step process, which included a formal ceasefire and the 'normalisation' of civilian life
in the north and east before political negotiations could commence. This position called for
the redressing of the consequences of war before addressing its causes.
31. The LTTE made the fourth round of talks dependent on the acceptance of four
demands: a complete lifting of the economic embargo on Jaffna save for goods such as
explosives and firearms; the lifting of the ban on sea fishing; the dismantling of the
armycamp at Pooneryn, on the main road link between Jaffna and the mainland; and the right
for armed LTTE cadres to move unimpeded throughout eastern Sri Lanka.
32. The government accepted the first two LTTE demands as linked to the people's well
being and indicated willingness to compromise. The embargo on fuel was to be lifted and
fishing permitted except within one kilometer of army camps on the coast. The government
also promised to review the status of the Pooneryn camp within three months or with the
resumption of political negotiations, whichever came first. At the same time, however, it
suggested that Pooneryn, as well as the movement of LTTE cadres in the east, should be
discussed in the light of the cessation of hostilities agreement which had provided for the
freezing of all military positions.
33. The PA Coalition. An alliance of several centre-left and leftist political parties, the
PA entered Parliament as the largest single grouping after the 1994 general election. It is
dominated by the Sri Lanka Freedom Party (SLFP), which holds 87 per cent of its
parliamentary seats. To achieve a parliamentary majority and form an effective government,
the PA was required to enter into coalition with the seven MPs of the Sri Lanka Muslim
Congress (SLMC) and P. Chandrasekaran, the single MP of the Up-Country People's Front
(UCPF), elected to Parliament as an independent. Under Chandrika Bandaranaike
Kumaratunge, the PA was able to persuade the Ceylon Tamil parties in Parliament and the
Ceylon Workers Congress (CWC) representing Up-country Tamils to support its initiatives
for peace and constitutional reform.
RESTRICTED
13
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
14/42
RESTRICTED
34. While these promised concessions salvaged the fourth round of talks, the LTTE
declared them evasive and non-committal and by 18 April had announced their withdrawal
from the negotiation process. On 19 April, they attacked and destroyed two gunboats of the
Sri Lanka navy anchored at Trincomalee, unilaterally ending the cessation of hostilities.
35. Many explanations have been proffered for the break-down of the negotiations: that
the Sri Lankan government was not serious about restoring 'normalcy' to the civilians living
in the north; that both the LTTE and the military used the period of 'peace' to re-arm and
regroup; that the LTTE leadership was unwilling to countenance an openly democratic
process leading to the solution of the ethnic conflict; and that the government sought merely
to establish a favorable impression among the international community to secure economic
assistance. What is clear is that, in unilaterally collapsing the peace process, the LTTE
damaged its own credibility and enhanced that of the government, both nationally and
internationally.
36. Ceasefire and Cessation of Hostilities. The cessation 8of hostilities agreement signed
in January 1995 by the government and the LTTE included many of the clauses of a formal
ceasefire agreement covering monitoring committees, communications between forces
commanders and restrictions on the position and movement of combatants. The contentious
feature was the final clause under which the only condition for either side to terminate the
agreement was the delivery of at least 72 hours notice.
8http://peaceinsrilanka.org
37. The crucial difference was that the government, in contrast to the LTTE, took a multi-
track approach to negotiations. While it was willing to discuss confidence- building measures
such as the lifting of embargoes, the rehabilitation of the north and the restoration of
electricity supplies, the government was also keen to move forward on the framework of a
political solution. The LTTE, on the other hand, wanted evidence that confidence-building
measures would be implemented before they proceeded with further negotiations. The LTTE
RESTRICTED
14
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
15/42
RESTRICTED
was also jealous of its perceived status as the sole legitimate voice of Ceylon Tamil
nationalism. As such, it warned the government not to release political proposals without its
input and approval.
38. Relations between the government and the LTTE began to sour in the next few
months. Elements within the government began to doubt the good faith of the LTTE while
the LTTE accused the government of failing to fulfill its promises to relieve socio-economic
hardship in the north. By 19 April 1995, all goodwill had lapsed and Eelam War III, as it
came to be called, had begun.
39. Devolution Proposals after Failed Attempts. Having9 failed in its attempts at
negotiation, the government embarked on a new strategy for resolving the armed conflict,
which was at once highly ambitious and deeply controversial. On the one hand, a full-scale
military assault was launched with the purpose of eliminating LTTE control of the north and
east. On the other, the government sought to devise a devolution package behind which all
constitutional political parties could unite. Seeking to engineer peace while continuing
hostilities with a powerful and determined adversary was a novel and high-risk strategy. The
PA government pressed ahead, however, and published the first of three versions of its
devolution proposals on 3 August 1995.
9Premaratne, Eranthi- (Paper presented at the Euro Regions Summer University, Institute of Federalism, University of Fribourg,
Switzerland)Sri Lanka: From a Unitary to a Federal State
40. Seeking to redefine 'the constitutional foundation of a plural society within a united
and sovereign Sri Lanka', the proposals set out a basic framework for the structure of
devolution, for government finance, for law and order, land, education, the administration of
justice and the civil service. They also suggested a specific government commission on
devolution and a division of powers based on just two lists of functions; one Regional, one
'Reserved'.
RESTRICTED
15
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
16/42
RESTRICTED
CHAPTER TWO
SCHEMES OF DEVOLUTION OF POWER: IN AN ATTEMPT TO FIND A VIABLE
SOLUTION TO THE ETHNIC CONFLICT.
41. The federal idea is about unity in diversity. It means self-rule and shared rule. That is,
the centre, which shares power with the regions, is responsible for certain areas of
government, whilst the regions administer themselves in others. Most commonly, areas of
central competence are powers with regard to defence, monetary policy and foreign relations.
Most federal states have elaborate formal or informal structures of intergovernmental co-
operation, especially over fiscal and expenditure responsibilities. Federal inter-governmental
relations are not only between the centre and the periphery; they are between regions as well,
and represent interlocking mechanisms of power sharing and co-existence. This particular
feature also illustrates the ethos of peaceful, amicable, co-operative interdependence that is
the hallmark of federal systems.
42. It is in the wake of this that the present federal discourse discusses the model of
federalism to be adopted, nature and extent of the division and sharing power and nature and
number of constituent units. It is widely accepted that Sri Lanka should not directly adopt any
available model but rather study existing models and adopt and adapt one that is suitable to
us. Some of the recommended models are the existing federal systems of Canada, India,
Belgium and Switzerland.
43. Division of Power. Discussion on sharing and division10 of power is inherently
important in the discourse. In this regard as is the tradition it is expected that subjects such as
foreign policy, external relations, national defence, will be retained at the center while
education, health, transportation will be devolved to the periphery. However a number of
disagreements between the parties are bound to arise during the discussion. The existing
LTTE military structure and the future of national defence and the demand by the LTTE to
RESTRICTED
16
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
17/42
RESTRICTED
receive and administer foreign loans and funds independently of the center and its impact on
the future of external relations and finance are two issues expected to raise in future proposals
too.
44. Another point that will be difficult to reach agreement on is the powers of each
authority over resources. It is essential for each unit to have sufficient amounts of resources
for survival. In this regard land remains a highly controversial issue. Land under the 13 th
amendment is a devolved subject, subject to certain conditions. However the central
government at all times effectively maintains a tight control over land, land development and
related issues. Other subjects that are bound to raise heated debates are irrigation, water and
forests.
45. What the two parties (LTTE&GOSL) seem to agree on is the problematic nature of
the concurrent list and the necessity to do away with it. Given the negative experiences of
power sharing it is no surprise that both parties seem to want to draw a clear distinction
between powers of the two authorities to avoid ambiguity and the consequent power
struggles. As power sharing between the two authorities of power is inevitable, this objective
may not necessarily be achieved. A practical hindrance to the smooth functioning of the
10devolution Proposals of 1996
federal structure would be the centralising attitude of the Sri Lankans in general and the
central government authorities in particular. The LTTEs highly centralized attitudes are also
bound to make the implementation of shared power even more difficult.
46. When discussing11 sharing and division of power a factor that demands attention is
whether Sri Lanka will adopt a symmetric or an asymmetric model. Those in favor of
asymmetric federalism justify their view on the basis that if the Tamil peoples right to
internal self determination is recognized and their aspirations for a homeland is to be met it is
only but fair to confer them with special powers. Another argument in favor of asymmetric
federalism is that since it is only the Tamil political groups that are serious about division of
RESTRICTED
17
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
18/42
RESTRICTED
power they should be entitled to be conferred with extra powers. In this regard it is of the
view that a Quebec style arrangement would be most suitable to base the asymmetric model
for Sri Lanka. Challenges for such an arrangement would come in the form of a merged
North East and Muslims, and resistance by the southerners. Just to get a feel for the amount
of resistance that an asymmetric model may encounter.
47. Another issue that is discussed in the discourse is the nature and number of units.
Although the debate is tilted in favor of a territorial framework the non-territorial nature of
the system comes up in relation to the upcountry Tamils and Muslims. With regard to the
former it is argued that they may not constitute a People within the same category as the Sri
Lankan Tamils as the two communities do not have much in common including their
aspirations. There is also the question as to whether they would want to share power with the
Sri Lankan Tamils. With regard to the latter the issue is raised as about majority of the
Muslims live dispersed and away from the East.
48. Minority Communities. There is much ambiguity with regard to the number of
constituent units in the federal structure. It is also unclear whether North and East will
11Subairdeen, Muslims and the Ethnic Conflict, The Island, 5th June 2003
constitute a single unit or if they will be de-merged. The Tamils of course demand for a
single Northeast unit as the resources of the East is vital for development, hence the demand
for internal self determination of the Tamil speaking people. The Muslim12 community on
the other hand is not happy with the idea of a single North- East unit and demand for a
separate administrative unit for Muslims within such unit. The leadership of the Sri Lanka
Muslim Congress (SLMC) demands a de-merged East for the Muslims if the LTTE fails to
stop attacks on them. The majority of the Muslim population in Sri Lanka continues to live inareas away from the northland eastern provinces. Prior to the onset of the ethnic war, their
identity was not a contentious political issue. It does not mean that the Muslim community
RESTRICTED
18
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
19/42
RESTRICTED
did not really have problems when the ethnic war broke out in 1980s.Of course; their
problems were not viewed in a political perspective.
49. In the search for a political solution to the ethnic conflict, the Muslim community
demanding a single administrative council in the Eastern province. Though a similar proposal
was included in the Bandaranaike-Chelvanayakam Pact, it failed to gather momentum till the
1980s. Whilst the LTTE launched its campaign for a separate state, the Muslims put forward
their claim mainly for an administrative unit, which would guarantee their separate identity.
The government made use of the Muslim community in the north and east for only war
purposes and in consequence they fell easy victims to assassinations by the LTTE. Muslims
who were evicted wholesale from the Jaffna peninsula by the LTTE in 1990 sought refuge in
the eastern and southern parts of the country. A host of problems such as devolution of
power, security, land and levy of taxes has seriously affected the lives of the Muslim
Community. The Muslim congress, which really brought the Muslims to the political
limelight, is in crisis today. After the ceasefire agreement, the Muslim Congress and the
LTTE reached agreement on 06/04/2002 on the following lines:
12Sri Lanka Ethnic Problem & Solutions -By Mr Lionol Guruge
a. Return of lands expropriated from the Muslims by the LTTE.
b. Restraining levy of taxes from the Muslims.
c. Cessation of violence against the Muslims.
d. Recognition of Muslim Congress as the sole representative of the Muslim
community.
e. Establishment of peace committees at every village in the eastern
province.
50. As the compliance with these assurances were not forthcoming problems arose again
between the two parties. Devolution13 of power to a single regional council for north and east
would result in a 17.6% reduction in the Muslim population. It is quite natural for the
RESTRICTED
19
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
20/42
RESTRICTED
Muslims to oppose any move to set up a single regional council, since their community
constitutes 35% of the entire eastern province population. However, in the event of the
eastern province being carved out, the devolution of power- manner of devolution based on
population and the extent of devolution would pose a challenge to the authorities.
51. Apart from the specifics other mechanisms suggested are the double majority and a
mechanism for power sharing at the center between the majority and minority communities.
From the point of view of the minorities it is essential that a rigid constitution is put in
place to ensure that decisions taken and embodied in the constitution will not be unilaterally
changed by the majoritarian governments and powers given with one hand are not taken away
by the other.
52. The first milestone in the devolution policy in Sri Lanka was the 13th Amendment to
the Constitution, certified on 14 th November 1987 with the introduction of the Provincial
Council System. Devolution of power was introduced for the first time in the post-colonial
Sri Lankan Constitution.
13 www.statistics.org
53. The Indo-Lanka accord provided acknowledgement of the distinct character of the
Northeast, although the devolved powers granted to the regions were limited, leaving most
powers with the central government. The 13th amendment permits the centre both to retain so
much power and also to undermine devolved powers so easily, that it could not lead to
substantial devolution.
54. The reform proposal from 1995, which is incorporated in the draft constitution
produced in 1997, represents the most far-reaching attempt to share power as a means of
ethnic reconciliation. It defines the nature of the state as a Union of regions This draft
RESTRICTED
20
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
21/42
RESTRICTED
constitution, in moving away from a fixed unitary state, has brought about a pattern shift in
policy formulation towards a meaningful sharing of power between regions and communities.
55. Viable Proposal on Devolution. The most current proposal on devolution is the Draft
Constitution from August 2000 for which both major parties reflected the agreement.
However, the proposal is rather unsatisfactory and even moderate Tamil parties who were
willing to compromise and support the October 1997 draft, had difficulties in accepting it.
The most significant negative change was the deletion of the reference to Sri Lanka as a
union of regions.
56. Increase of good control at the local level would necessitate more independence of the
local Government from national party politics and financial empowerment of the local
authorities. The same is relevant for the newly established interim institutions in the North-
East of Sri Lanka, Which should work transparently, encourage peoples participation and
should be inclusive of all identify groups to avoid the fuelling of new tensions. At the same
time the new arrangements should avoid further disempowerment of the existing democratic
institutions at the local level. The recently revived discussion on federal structures as means
to facilitate conflict resolution in Sri Lanka needs to keep the different settings within the 8
provinces of Sri Lanka in mind trying to accommodate the claims of the respective minority
groups. The question of autonomy is central to many conflicts today and regional autonomy
can play an important, constructive role in mediating relations between different communities
in multi-ethnic states. It can defuse conflicts. It is a particularly appropriate mechanism for
the protection and promotion of the culture and values of a community. But it is not an easy
device to put into operation, especially considering that there are often minorities within the
newly created regional units, which again need to be recognized and accommodated. Great
political and technical skills are required to structure the federal set-up and make it work.
57. In recent times revived debate on a federal solution to the conflict in Sri Lanka within
the peace process there is naturally the tendency to focus mainly on the conflict in the
Northeast. Besides the model of a integration, the idea of introducing asymmetric federal
RESTRICTED
21
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
22/42
RESTRICTED
structures, through devolving autonomy only to the North-Eastern Province and not to the
same extent to the other provinces is recently discussed. That regional autonomy could be
acceptable to the LTTE has been a major outcome of the first round of peace talks in
Thailand in September 2002. As there are no similar claims for autonomy from the southern
or central regions, asymmetric devolution of power or federalism could at the same time help
to avoid overburdening the other regions with additional responsibilities to be carried out by
intermediary institutions within a federal structure. With the encouraging signal made by the
LTTE it seems to be the right time to discuss the potentials and obstacles as well as different
models of a federal state structure in more depth and in a transparent way. This will require
that more politicians, civil society activists and the people be getting involved in this
discourse. There are still a lot of open questions and scope for discussion of different models
of federalism. But it needs to be kept in mind that it is not only the grievances of the North-
Eastern Tamils, which need to be addressed in the coming peace talks, but also generally the
grievances of different minority groups in all regions of the country.
CHAPTER THREE
FEDERALISM IS CONSIDERD AS A PERCEIVED POLITICAL SOLUTION TO
THE ETHNIC CONFLICT.
58. The failed attempts at devolution of power within a unitary constitution have only
strengthened the belief among those advocating the division of power says that meaningful
power sharing is only possible within a federal framework. The arguments for and against a
federal Sri Lanka are by no means unique. Rather they are based largely on the fundamentals
of federalism.
RESTRICTED
22
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
23/42
RESTRICTED
59. The Federal Framework. Meaningful division of power at this particular point in time
for Sri Lanka is necessary for two main reasons; firstly as a means of reducing the existing
autocratic nature of the State and secondly as a means of addressing the present conflict.
Federalism for the first cause is advanced for its salient feature, division of power. Thereby a
federal constitution is expected to take the highly concentrated powers away from the center.
As the present governing structure stands the central government is all-powerful and all
powers including those devolved could be exercised by the center. Adding to the highly
centralized nature is the executive presidential system. The federal framework is expected to
reduce substantially the autocratic nature of the center and provide for a reasonable
distribution of powers between the center and periphery.
60. As mentioned above proponents of federalism see this as the only way to ensure a fair
distribution of resources and opportunities. The present conflict and the two JVP
insurrections were triggered off to a large extent due to certain sections of society being
deprived of resources and opportunities. Therefore any sustainable solution should
adequately address this issue. Fair distribution of resources and opportunities would ensure
increased participation of those marginalized from both minority and majority communities
in the democratic decision making process. A federal framework therefore would be the best
to address minority grievances and also to solve many difficulties facing the marginalized
within the majority community.
61. In the present context the federal constitution for Sri Lanka will be introduced as a
result of the resolution of the present conflict. Therefore the highly diverse nature of the Sri
Lankan society is to be emphasized in the federal constitution and consequently provide for
reconciliation. It is in this respect that the unity in diversity aspect of the federal system will
be invoked. This coupled with the division of powers to ensure a fair distribution of resources
is expected to provide for durable peace.
62. Opponents of the cause on the other hand argue that meaningful devolution can be
done within a unitary constitution. It is their contention that the present 13 th amendment (with
RESTRICTED
23
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
24/42
RESTRICTED
or without modifications) could be used if supported by political will. However what needs to
be understood is that within the existing unitary framework the Provincial Councils occupy a
subordinate position to the central government, which makes meaningful devolution
impossible.
63. Strong opposition is raised on the point that a federal structure would lead to an
independent State first for the Tamils then for the Muslims and subsequently the
disintegration of the country. It is argued that the demarcation of boundaries of the States and
existing organized administrative structure would make secession easier. USSR and
Yugoslavia are frequently quoted examples for disintegrated federal countries. What one
should note in this regard is that though federations, both these examples were communist
States in which democracy was a far cry. Feeding into the fears of potential secession is the
LTTEs total disrespect for democracy, their insistence on an exit clause in the constitution
and their capability of unilateral and de facto separation.
64. Federalism is a lively discussed issue in Sri Lanka since 1926, when S.W.R.D
Bandaranaike advocated the idea of federalism as a constitutional response to Sri Lankas
diversity. Federal and quasi-federal solutions have been central to the constitutional debate on
the resolution of the conflict in the North-East. The potentials of conflict management
through a federal system are discussed and promoted by different parties, academics and
organizations.
65. Democracy does not guarantee sufficient representation for all interest groups, as
majority rule may permanently shut minorities out of power. In such circumstances of
politically mobilized ethnic consciousness, a unitary state is liable to leave minority ethnic
groups feeling powerless, insecure and excluded. The lack of influence over decision-making
and recognition often leads to secessionist movements of mobilized ethnic groups.
Federalism plays a valuable role in strengthening democracy by institutionalizing
decentralization and thus preserving the autonomy of regional and local governments, and
providing a better representation to minority groups. Therefore federalism can hold a multi-
RESTRICTED
24
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
25/42
RESTRICTED
ethnic state together by reconciling nationalism and democracy in a multi ethnic state giving
territorial concentrated minorities authority over matters of local concern, security in the use
of their language, culture, and religion, and protection from the discretion of the sentiments
of the national majority.
66. Disintegrated Federal Countries. Countries seeking to maintain the unity of the state
in multiethnic and Multinational societies choose federalism as a form of geographical
pluralism. A federation is a way of bridging ethnic diversity by incorporating such
differences within a wider political community.
67. The territorial autonomy enables national minorities to establish and govern their own
public institutions operating in their language including schools, universities, courts and
regional parliaments. The following federal states provide an overview of the changing nature
of federalism and discuss basic characteristics of the federal systems, Some of the
recommended models are the existing federal systems of Canada, India, Belgium and
Switzerland are given as annex A.
CHAPTER FOUR
FEDERALISM: WILL IT BE ABLE TO BRING ABOUT LASTING PEACE?
68. Another case in point that needs discussion is whether a federal framework would
indeed be successful in achieving democracy if the LTTE continues with its fascist
undemocratic practices. This is a matter that needs serious thought, considering the fact that
LTTE claims to be the sole representatives of the Tamil people and therefore the legitimate
authority of power.
69. A point that is repeatedly raised during discussions is the creation of minorities within
minorities and if this would result in the regional minorities suffering a similar fate as the
RESTRICTED
25
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
26/42
RESTRICTED
national minorities. The demand for a separate State has been on the basis of the Tamil-
speaking people right to self-determination. However Muslims though Tamil speaking,
having suffered at the hands of the LTTE are insisting on a separate administrative authority
for Muslim dominated areas. The few Sinhalese who lived in the North may never want to go
back to a Tamil majority area.
70. Some of the other objections against a federal Sri Lanka are, given the small
geographic area of the country extensive division is unnecessary and setting up elaborate
administrative structures would only result in unnecessary expenditure and wastage of
resources.
71. After a war is terminated, the establishment of a federation on the basis of equal rights
for the conflict parties can be successful to prevent the outbreak of future conflicts. In this
regard, the Memorandum of Understanding between the Sri Lankan government and the
LTTE has provided the necessary condition to allow the debate on federalism to be re-
established and the ongoing peace talk provides the necessary foundation that the
establishment of a future federal structure for Sri Lanka can be envisaged.
CONCLUSION
72. The decision by the Government and the LTTE to explore a political settlement of the
conflict based on internal self determination for the Tamil speaking peoples in their areas of
historical habitation founded on federal structure within a united Sri Lanka, in December
2002 as an outcome of the third round of peace negotiations, had cast the idea of federalism
into the spotlight of the conflict transformation process in Sri Lanka. Moreover, it can be
argued that it has removed the disreputable very idea was bound in as far as political
discourse in Sri Lanka is concerned.
73. Federalism is somewhat strange to this island but the idea of federalism and the
legislative provisions paving the way for a federal structure is totally not new to us. The
RESTRICTED
26
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
27/42
RESTRICTED
cardinal feature of federalism is distribution of powers between the federal authority and the
federating units. The provincial council system commissioned under the 13 th Constitutional
Amendment marks the first attempt at devolving power to the periphery. It was also the first
constitutional effort made to resolve the ethnic conflict. Federalism offers solutions to
problems that arise in a unitary state. The essence of the federal system is unity in diversity.
Other characteristics such as pluralist society, autonomy for distinct ethnic groups etc. are
noteworthy features.
74. Federalism, incorrectly understood and purposely distorted has been vilified as the
formula for the disintegration of the state and division of the country. At the very best it has
been dismissed as an idea whose time will never come in the local context and been deemed
improbable and unrealistic. After the Oslo Communiqu on 5 th December 2002, this had
changed. Federalism has to be taken seriously. It could be the founding idea of a new social
contract and constitutional special consideration in Sri Lanka. A state so dominated with its
unitary character and an organization likewise monopolized and bent on secession, have
found common ground in committing themselves to an exploration of federalism as the way
out of animosity and the way forward for coexistence. Under a federal constitution full
powers are delegated to each federating unit.
75. The federating units have one or two legislative bodies of their own to discuss matters
concerning the whole country. Each province in Sri Lanka shall be entitled to the right of
autonomy. There should be one or two legislative authorities to decide on the countrys
special revenue and expenditure. Once the thousand and one arguments advanced against this
system subside, federalism will remain the best form of solution for Sri Lankas travails. As
a possible solution to the minority, the Muslims have manifested an interest in an Indian
model put in to practice in Pondichery in South India- a centrally governed system applicable
to geographically noncontiguous areas.
76. The point that needs to be made and made again is that federalism is not a solution or
our current problem: once adapted and put to work shortcomings will be revealed and will
RESTRICTED
27
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
28/42
RESTRICTED
have to be rectified. In effect, the federal project for democratic peace and governance will be
always in the nature of a work in progress. However, given five and a half decades of ethnic
strife and worsening governance under the defence of unitary state, federalism strongly
recommends itself as the obvious destination of the necessary paradigm shift in our political
and constitutional evolution. We need to get to know it, fashion it to our needs and make it
work. This will be both fascinating and frustrating. Political culture as well as institutions and
processes have to be transformed. Therefore all of us have to be involved and take both our
rights and duties as stakeholders in a new Sri Lanka seriously. Sri Lanka is a country split on
ethnic and religious lines. Such a country could be united through the instrument of
devolution of powers. Only guaranteeing their rights under a federal structure could contain
secessionist tendencies among different ethnic groups in a unitary state. The only viable
solution to this long dragging ethnic conflict will be a federal solution, Asymmetric or the
Symmetric? One needs to practice anyone of these two federal systems to see the feasibility.
IBLIOGRAPHY
Sri Lanka Etnic Problem & Solutions
By Mr Lionol Guruge
Centre for Policy Alternatives
Bindebir, Serap/ Handshin, Mia/ Jovanovic, Miodrag/ Rieck, Christian E
Federalism, Decentralization and Conflict Management in Multicultural Societies
International Community
RESTRICTED
28
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
29/42
RESTRICTED
Buchanan, James M- (Discussion Paper)
Federalism and Individual Sovereignty
Cato Journal, Vol.15. No.4-5, 2001
Bastian, Sunil (International Centre for Ethnic Studies)
Devolution and Development in Sri Lanka 1994(pp 198-205)
Welikala, Asanga- (Discussion Paper)
Bigdon , Christine (Discussion Paper)
Decentralization Federalism and Ehnic Conflict in Sri Lanka
Buchanan, JM (1995)
Federalism as an Ideal Political Order and an Objective for Constitutional Reform
De Silva, HL (1991)
An Appraisal of the Federal Alternative for Sri Lanka
Sridevi Printers (PVT) Ltd
Edirisinha, Rohan- (Discussion Paper)
Federalism: Myths and Realities
Elazar,Daniel J- (Discussion Paper)
Three Federal-type Solutions in Dealing with Multi-ethnicity:
Published, spring 1999
Elazar, Daniel J-(Discussion Paper)
Federalism and Peace- Making
Commentary, November 1999
Fleming, Thomas- (Discussion Paper )
RESTRICTED
29
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
30/42
RESTRICTED
The Federal Principle
@ 2002 EBSCO Publishing.
Manikkalingam, Ram (Social Scientists Association 2003)
A Unitary State, A Federal State or Two Separate States?
ISBN 955-9102-53-2 (pp 1-6)
Premaratne, Eranthi- (Paper presented at the Euro Regions Summer University, Institute of
Federalism, University of Fribourg, Switzerland)
Sri Lanka: From a Unitary to a Federal State
Prof. Warnapala, Wiswa WA -1994
Ethnic Strife and Politics in Sri Lanka
ISBN81-7013-129-4 (pp 122-128)
Siriwardene, R (1996)
The Devolution Debate
International Centre for Ethnic Studies
Uyangoda, Jayadeva/Perera , Morina- (Social Scientists Association)
Sri Lankas Peace Process-2002: Critical Perspectives -2003
ISBN 955-9102-54-0
Welikala, Asanga (Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA)
Fiscal and Financial Arrangements in A Federal Sri Lanka
ISBN-955-8037-58-3
Welikala, Asanga- (Discussion Paper)Democratization and Conflict Resolution: The Rationale for Federalizing Sri Lanka
Welikala, Asanga- (Discussion Paper)
RESTRICTED
30
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
31/42
RESTRICTED
Towards Two Nations In One State: The Devolution Project In Sri Lanka
Euro Regions Summer University
Welikala, Asanga (Centre for Policy Alternatives (CPA)
The Federal Idea
ISBN:955-8037-83-4 (pp 7-14)
Annex A To
Commandants Research Paper
1. German Federal Government. Germany has a strong tradition of regional government
dating back to the founding of the German Empire in 1871. Since unification in 1990, the
Federal Republic has consisted of sixteen Laender: the ten Laender of the former West
Germany, the five new Laenderof the former East Germany, and Berlin. (However, Berlin
and the easternLandof Brandenburg are slated to merge in either 1999 or 2002.) The Land
governments are based on a parliamentary system. Most Laender have unicameral
legislatures, whose members are elected directly by popular vote. The party or coalition of
parties in control of the legislature chooses a minister president to lead theLandgovernment.
The minister president selects a cabinet to run Land agencies and carry out the executive
RESTRICTED
31
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
32/42
RESTRICTED
functions of theLandgovernment. Minister Presidents are highly visible national figures and
often progress to federal office, either the chancellorship or a position in the federal cabinet
2. The Basic Law divides authority between the federal government and the Laender,
with the general principle governing relations articulated in Article 30: "The exercise of
governmental powers and the discharge of governmental functions shall be incumbent on the
Laenderinsofar as this Basic Law does not otherwise prescribe or permit." Thus, the federal
government can exercise authority only in those areas specified in the Basic Law. The federal
government is assigned a greater legislative role and the Land governments a greater
administrative role. The fact that Land governments employ more civil servants than by
federal and local governments combined illustrates the central administrative function of the
Laender.
3. The Basic Law divides the federal government's legislative responsibilities into
exclusive powers (Articles 71 and 73), concurrent powers (Articles 72, 74, and 74a), and
framework powers (Article 75). The exclusive legislative jurisdiction of the federal
government extends to defense, foreign affairs, immigration, transportation, communications,
and currency standards. The federal and Land governments share concurrent powers in
several areas, including civil law, refugee and expellee matters, public welfare, land
management, consumer protection, public health, and the collection of vital statistics (data on
births, deaths, and marriages). In the areas of mass media, nature conservation, regional
planning, and public service regulations, framework legislation limits the federal
government's role to offering general policy guidelines, which the Laenderthen act upon by
means of detailed legislation. The areas of shared responsibility for the Laender and the
federal government were enlarged by an amendment to the Basic Law in 1969 (Articles 91a
and 91b), which calls for joint action in areas of broad social concern such as higher
education, regional economic development, and agricultural reform.
4. All policy areas not assigned to federal jurisdiction are within the legislative purview
of the Laender. These areas include education, law enforcement, regulation of radio and
RESTRICTED
32
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
33/42
RESTRICTED
television, church affairs, and cultural activities. The Laender retain significant powers of
taxation. Land officials collect most federal taxes.
5. The Land governments also exercise power at the national level through the
Bundesrat, which is made up of representatives appointed by the Landgovernments. In this
way, the Laenderaffect the federal legislative process. Half of the members of the Federal
Convention, which elects a federal president, are Landofficials, and the Landgovernments
also take part in the selection of judges for the federal courts.
6. American way of Federalism .The principle of American federalism, created in the
eighteenth century, was bold and has greatly affected U.S. history. Its influence continues
today. During the late 1780s the debates over ratification of the Constitution by Federalistsand Anti-Federalists shaped controversies concerning the rights and powers of states in
relation to the federal government.
7. The ideas stated in the "Federalist" papers are at the core of civic culture in the United
States and serve as a reference for citizens in other democratic nations of the world. The 15th
through the 22nd "Federalist" papers, for example, discuss the defects of the Articles of
Confederation, the federal system that preceded ratification of the U.S. Constitution. The 39th
"Federalist" paper shows that federalism provided by the U.S. Constitution is a compound
system that conjoins national and state powers.
8. Although it was not directly named in the Constitution, federalism is a central
principle of government in the United States of America.. This Digest defines federalism and
discusses basic characteristics of the U.S. federal system; provides an overview of the
changing nature of federalism in the United States.The word federal denotes alliances
between independent sovereignties. "The Oxford Guide to the U.S. Government," an
important source for any student or teacher of history, describes federalism in the United
States as "the division of governmental powers between the national and state governments."
"The Oxford Guide" informs that "state governments can neither ignore nor contradict
federal statutes that conform to the supreme law, the Constitution" (Patrick, Pious, and
RESTRICTED
33
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
34/42
RESTRICTED
Ritchie 2001, 234-235). Unlike a confederation, a federal republic does not permit a state to
have full or primary sovereignty over its internal affairs. If a conflict exists between the state
and federal government, the supremacy clause mandates that federal laws are supreme. The
powers of the central or national government typically are enumerated in a written
constitution.
9. Under the U.S. Constitution, any powers not specifically granted to the national
government are presumed to be retained by state governments. State governments have their
own spheres of jurisdiction and often have been extolled as important laboratories for
governmental experimentation. Throughout United States history, individuals have argued
that the states are better able than the national government to respond effectively to public
policy issues. Others seek the strength of the national government, particularly during timesof crisis. The U.S. federal system has five basic characteristics:
a. Federalism provides a division of legal authority between state and national
governments. Overlap occurs, but two legally distinct spheres of government exist.
b. The states are subordinate to the national government in such areas as
management of foreign affairs and regulation of interstate commerce.
c. Federalism enables positive cooperation between state and national
governments in programs pertaining to education, interstate highway construction,
environmental protection and health, unemployment, and social security concerns.
d. The U.S. Supreme Court serves as legal arbiter of the federal system in regard
to conflicting claims of state and national governments.
e. The two levels of government exercise direct authority simultaneously over
people within their territory. Dual citizenship exists under federalism, and individuals
can claim a wide range of rights and privileges from both state and national
governments.
RESTRICTED
34
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
35/42
RESTRICTED
10. Political scientists define two types of federalism: dual and cooperative. From one
vantage point, federalism can be viewed as a "layer" cake (dual); from another it may be
pictured as a "rainbow" or "marble" cake (cooperative).
11. Proponents of states' rights and powers hold that the Constitution is a compact
between the states and the federal government. Both states and the national government are
supreme within their own spheres. Advocates of dual federalism argue that the national
government cannot "invade" the power that is reserved for the states.
12. Proponents of the position that the people, not the states, created the federal
government want a cooperative approach to state-nation relations. Cooperative federalism
emphasizes the "general welfare" clause and the "necessary and proper" clause of the
Constitution by which power of the national government may be expanded even if the actions
of the national government touch or overlap with traditional state functions
13. Federalism in Spain. Will Spain eventually cease to exist, at least in its present form?
It sounds an overly dramatic question, but it is one increasingly put forward by rightwing
critics as the prime minister, Jos Luis Rodriguez Zapatero's Socialists look for ways to keep
Spain's more independent-minded regions happy.
14. As a growing rift between Spain's left and right opened further in a parliamentary
debate over socialist proposals to negotiate with armed Basque separatist group Eta, the
country's regional problems are becoming increasingly apparent.
Only a small minority of Basque people back Eta's demands for a separate state, made up not
just of the three provinces of Spain's semi-autonomous Basque region, but also the region of
Navarre and a section of south-west France.
15. Plenty more, however, want the Basque country to have even more independence
from Madrid than the already considerable amount it currently enjoys.
There are similar demands from Catalonia, which wants more control over its own affairs.
RESTRICTED
35
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
36/42
RESTRICTED
Several other of the 17 "autonomous regions" that Spain was first divided into more than 20
years ago are also seeking greater self-rule.As Mr Zapatero's minority government prepares
to give way to some, but by no means all, of these petitions, Spain's traditionally centrist right
- and some sections of the left are furious.
16. Would federalism satisfy Catalans and Basques? Regional Basque premier Juan Jos &
ecute Ibarretxe, of the non-violent Basque Nationalist Party, has already put forward
proposals that would see his region become a "free associate" of Spain with a right to self-
determination.
17. The new government after winning elections recently, Mr Ibarretxe may be thinking
about toning down those proposals - which were partly designed to encourage Eta to give up
its arms. Opinion polls show that around a third of Basques might vote to split from Spain if
there was a referendum. Another third favour federalism. But centrists - on both the right and
the left - worry that awarding the Basques the right to self-determination would be the start of
a slow disintegration of Spain as first one bit, and then another, falls away. The Spanish
constitution currently calls on the armed forces to "defend Spain's territorial integrity That,
and the fact that the 800 victims of Eta's terrorism lie heavily on the minds of all politicians,
helps explain the virulence of the latest exchanges between Mr Rajoy and Mr Zapatero.
18. Spain, with its 20th century history of civil war and dictatorship, is acutely aware of
the dangers of splitting into what were once called "the Two Spains".
"Little Spaniard who is coming into this world, may God protect you. One of the two Spains
will freeze your heart," poet Antonio Machado wrote almost a century ago.
Some commentators now fret that the divided Spain of yesteryear - though, this time, in a
peaceful form is returning.
19. "The Two Spains were once more snapping their jaws at one another from the orator's
tribune," wrote Jess Cacho in El Mundo newspaper after the recent state of the nation
debate.
RESTRICTED
36
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
37/42
RESTRICTED
20. Federal System in India. India, a union of states, is a Sovereign, Secular, Democratic
Republic with a Parliamentary system of Government. The Indian polity is governed
in terms of the Constitution, which was adopted by the Constituent Assembly on 26
November 1949 and came into force on 26 November 1950.
21. The President is the constitutional head of Executive of the Union. Real executive
power vests in a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister as head. Article 74(1) of the
Constitution provides that there shall be a Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister
to aid and advise the President who shall, in exercise of his functions, act in accordance with
such advice. The Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha, the House
of the People.
22. In the states, the Governor, as the representative of the President, is the head of
Executive, but real executive power rests with the Chief Minister who heads the Council of
Ministers. The Council of Ministers of a state is collectively responsible to the elected
legislative assembly of the state.
23. The Constitution governs the sharing of legislative power between Parliament and the
State Legislatures, and provides for the vesting of residual powers in Parliament. The power
to amend the Constitution also vests in Parliament.
24. The Union Executive consists of the President, the Vice-President and Council of
Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid and advise the President.
25. President. The President is elected by members of an Electoral College consisting of
elected members of both Houses of Parliament and Legislative Assemblies of the states, with
suitable weightage given to each vote. His term of office is five years.
26. 1Among other powers, the President can proclaim an emergency in the country if he
is satisfied that the security of the country or of any part of its territory is threatened whether
RESTRICTED
37
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
38/42
RESTRICTED
by war or external agression or armed rebellion. When there is a failure of the constitutional
machinery in a state, he can assume to himself all or any of the functions of the government
of that state.
27. Vice-President. The Vice-President is elected by the members of an electoral college
consisting of members of both Houses of Parliament in accordance with the system of
proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote. He holds office for five
years. The Vice-President is Ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.
28. Council of Ministers . The Council of Ministers comprises Cabinet Ministers,
Minister of States (independent charge or otherwise) and Deputy Ministers. Prime
Minister communicates all decisions of the Council of Ministers relating to
administration of affairs of the Union and proposals for legislation to the President.
Generally, each department has an officer designated as secretary to the
Government of India to advise Ministers on policy matters and general
administration. The Cabinet Secretariat has an important coordinating role in
decision making at highest level and operates under direction of Prime Minister.
29. The Legislative Arm of the Union, called Parliament, consists of the President, Rajya
Sabha and Lok Sabha. All legislation requires consent of both houses of parliament.
However, in case of money bills, the will of the Lok Sabha always prevails.
30. Rajya Sabha .The Rajya Sabha consists of 245 members. Of these, 233 represent
states and union territories and 12 members are nominated by the President.
Elections to the Rajya Sabha are indirect; members are elected by the elected
members of Legislative Assemblies of the concerned states. The Rajya Sabha is
not subject to dissolution, one third of its members retire every second year.
RESTRICTED
38
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
39/42
RESTRICTED
31. Lok Sabha. The Lok Sabha is composed of representatives of the people chosen by
direct election on the basis of universal adult suffrage. As of today, the Lok Sabha
consists of 545 members with two members nominated by the President to
represent the Anglo-Indian Community. Unless dissolved under unusual
circumstances, the term of the Lok Sabha is five years.
32. State Governments. The system of government in states closely resembles that of the
Union. There are 25 states and seven Union territories in the country. Union
territories are administered by the president through an administrator appointed by
him. Till 1 February 1992, the Union Territory of Delhi was governed by the
Central government through an Administrator appointed by the President of India.
Through a Constitutional amendment in Parliament, the Union Territory of Delhi is
now called the National Capital Territory of Delhi from 1 February 1992. General
elections to the Legislative assembly of the National Capital Territory were held in
November 1993.
33. Political System. A recognised political party has been classified as a National Party
or a State Party. If a political party is recognised in four or more states, it is considered as a
National Party.The Congress, Bharatiya Janata Party, Janata Dal, Communist Party of India
and Communist Party of India (Marxist) are the prominent National Parties in the Country.
Telugu Desam in Andhra Pradesh, Asom Gana Parishad in Assam, Jharkhand Mukti Morcha
in Bihar, Maharashtrwad Gomantak Party in Goa, National Conference in Jammu and
Kashmir, Muslim League in Kerala, Shiv Sena in Maharashtra, Akali Dal in Punjab, All-
India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam in Tamil Nadu,
Bahujan Samaj Party and Samajwadi Party in Uttar Pradesh and All-India Forward Block in
West Bengal are the prominent state parties.
34. Eleven Lok Sabhas have been constituted so far. Except for the short-lived Sixth and
Ninth Lok Sabha, the Congress Party ruled the country. The Sixth Lok Sabha functioned for
RESTRICTED
39
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
40/42
RESTRICTED
about two years and four months and the Ninth Lok Sabha functioned for one year and two
months.
35. Judicial System. The Supreme Court is the head court in the country. The High Court
stands at the head of the state's judicial administration. Each state is divided into judicial
districts presided over by a district and sessions judge, who is the highest judicial authority in
a district. Below him, there are courts of civil jurisdiction, known in different states as
munsifs, sub-judges, civil judges and the like. Similarly, criminal judiciary comprises chief
judicial magistrate and judicial magistrates of first and second class.
36. Supreme Court .The Supreme Court has original, appellate and advisory jurisdiction.
Its exclusive original jurisdiction extends to all disputes between the Union and one or more
states or between two or more states. The Constitution gives an extensive original jurisdiction
to the Supreme Court to enforce Fundamental Rights.
37. Appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court can be invoked by a certificate of the
High Court concerned or by special leave granted by the Supreme Court in respect of any
judgement, decree or final order of a High Court in cases both civil and criminal, involving
substantial questions of law as to the interpretation of the constitution. The President may
consult the Supreme Court on any question of fact or law of public importance.
38. The Supreme Court of India comprises of the Chief Justice and not more than 25
other Judges appointed by the President. Judges hold office till 65 years of age.
RESTRICTED
40
8/4/2019 Federalism can be a viable solution for the ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka
41/42
RESTRICTED
39. High Courts . There are 18 High Courts in the country, three having jurisdiction over
more than one state. Bombay High Court has the jurisdiction over Maharashtra,
Goa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu. Guwahati High Court, which
was earlier known as Assam High Court, has the jurisdiction over Assam,
Manipur, Meghalaya, Nagaland, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh. Punjab
and Haryana High Court has the jurisdiction over Punjab, Haryana and
Chandigarh.
40. Among t