February 20-21, 2014 T EACHER P REPARATION T RANSFORMATION 2.0 P ROFESSIONAL L EARNING I NSTITUTE 1.

Post on 21-Jan-2016

221 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of February 20-21, 2014 T EACHER P REPARATION T RANSFORMATION 2.0 P ROFESSIONAL L EARNING I NSTITUTE 1.

February 20-21, 2014

TEACHER PREPARATION TRANSFORMATION 2.0

PROFESSIONAL LEARNING INSTITUTE

1

• Deepen knowledge of Common Core State Standards

• Provide input into prospectus• Provide input into aspirational

characteristics of clinical educators

Welcome & Meeting Objectives

2

Convergence of Core to College, CAEP, CAEP Alliance

and NTEP

Dr. Candice McQueen, Dean

Lipscomb University

APPROACHES AND RESOURCES TO HELP UNIVERSITY FACULTY DEVELOP A DEEPER

UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS

3

BREAK

4

Jeanne Burns & Linda McKee

CROSS CAMPUS COLLABORATION TO DEEPEN FACULTY UNDERSTANDING OF THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS WITH A FOCUS ON CAEP STANDARD 1 AND CAEP STANDARD 2

5

Task 1• (Small Group) Identify practices at Lipscomb

University• (Small Group) Identify practices in Louisiana’s

universities• (Large Group) Share identified practices• (Large Group) Identify existing resources in Louisiana

and new resources

6

Outcomes• List of resources and materials.• Awareness of strategies that support CAEP Standard 1 and 2.

BREAK AND DINNER at 5:30 PM

7

Institute reconvenes at 6:30 PM for discussion about

prospectus.

Potential Duration: 5 YearsPotential Amount of Funding: $5 to $8 million

Potential Source: Private Foundations

INPUT INTO A PROSPECTUS FOR MAJOR FUNDING TO SUPPORT NEEDS IDENTIFIED

FOR TEACHER PREPARATION TRANSFORMATION 2.0

8

Task 2• Identify Aspects of Teacher Preparation to be focus of

grant• Identify Outcome to be accomplished as a result of

the grant funds• Identify overall usage of the funds (e.g., campus

funding, state data collection, research to examine effective practices, etc.)

9

Outcomes• Understanding of how CTC, CAEP, NTEP, and grant prospectus will

support Teacher Preparation Transformation 2.0.• List of recommendations for inclusion in grant prospectus.

7:30 AM – 8:30 AM

BREAKFAST

10

Jeanne Burns & Linda McKee

NEW DIRECTIONS FOR CAEP ALLIANCE AND INPUT INTO CHARACTERISTICS OF

ASPIRATIONAL CLINICAL EDUCATORS FOR CAEP ALLIANCE CLINICAL EDUCATOR DESIGN

TEAM

11

Task 3• (Small Group) Share aspirational characteristics

identified by faculty, PK-12 educator partners, and others

• (Small Group) Select the 5 most important aspirational characteristics for university and PK-12 clinical educators

• (Large Group) Share the most important characteristics with the large group

12

Outcomes• List of aspirational characteristics of clinical educators.

LACTE Meeting at 9:45 AM

CLOSING

13