Post on 14-Apr-2018
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
1/15
WhitePaper
Optimizing Storage for Server Virtualization
Why an Enterprise-Class Fully-Virtualized iSCSI SAN is more Cost Effective
than Legacy NAS, SAN and DAS in Virtual Server Environments
By Brian Garrett and Mark Bowker
May, 2010
This ESG White Paper was commissioned by Dell EqualLogic, Inc.
and is distributed under license from ESG.
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
2/15
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
3/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 3
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Introduction
Server virtualization and consolidation technologies can help organizations struggling with cost containment and
continuing information growth. Many have already implemented server virtualization, while others are planning to
either start or accelerate virtualization deployments. The reduction in hardware costs is certainly attractive as
increased resource utilization and physical serve consolidation keep total cost of ownership (TCO) down.
ESGs annual spending survey indicates that key IT priorities for the next 18 months include an increase in servervirtualization deployments (see Figure 1). Of 515 surveyed users, 33% selected this as their top priority. Improving
data backup and recovery was third, with 27%this remains a perennial favorite as protecting information seems
to always be on the minds of IT professionals.1
Figure 1. Top 10 IT Priorities Over the Next 12-18 Months
Source: Enterprise Strategy Group, 2010.
Storage Choices
One challenge with deploying server virtualization is selecting the right storage infrastructure that will serve as a
foundation and scale to meet the challenge of top tier applications. Direct-attached storage (DAS), networked-
attached storage (NAS,) and both Fibre Channel (FC) and iSCSI storage area networks (SANs) are viable for servervirtualization; however, they are not equal in terms of functionality, ease-of-use, or cost.
Direct-attached storage is the term used to define the hard drives inside of, or directly attached to, a
server; capacity can be attached using SCSI, SATA, or SAS connections. In contrast, FC SANs, multi-protocol
NAS, and iSCSI SANs are connected to servers through a shared storage network.
FC SANs provide block-based storage. They connect to servers using FC HBAs on the hosts and FC switches
in the network and are traditionally built as modular, dual-controller systems.
1Source: ESG Research Report, 2010 IT Spending Intentions Survey, January 2010.
19%
20%
21%
23%
24%
25%
27%
27%
28%
33%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Regulatory compliance initiatives
Large-scale desktop/laptop PC refresh
Business continuity/disaster recovery programs
Data center consolidation
Major application deployments or upgrades
Manage data growth
Upgrade network infrastructure
Improve data backup and recovery
Information security initiatives
Increase use of server virtualization
What are your organizations most important IT priorities over the next 12-18
months? (Percent of respondents, N=515, ten responses accepted)
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
4/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 4
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
NAS deployments offer file-based storage and connect hosts to storage arrays using an Ethernet LAN,
standard Ethernet adapters and switches, and the NFS and CIFS file serving protocols.
iSCSI SANs offer block-based storage and use the iSCSI protocol over Ethernet along with Ethernet NICs and
switches.
These server virtualization storage alternatives are shown in Figure 2. In the DAS deployment, storage resources
are not shared; each array is attached only to a single server. SAN and NAS implementations share storage over a
network. In recent years, storage vendors have been producing unified storage arrays that offer multiple protocols
in a single array; for example, most legacy NAS solutions have evolved to support iSCSI. Unified solutions that have
evolved from a legacy NAS heritage typically implement the iSCSI protocol as an additional protocol layer which is
used to access data that is ultimately stored in a file system hidden inside the storage.
Figure 2. Virtual Server Storage Deployment Options
Source: Enterprise Strategy Group, 2010.
iSCSI and Server Virtualization on the Rise
ESG research has noted an uptick in the adoption of iSCSI SANs and server virtualization. As Figure 3 demonstrates,
there has been a significant increase in iSCSI adoption in both midmarket and enterprise organizations. In 2009, ESGsurveyed 1,433 North America-based storage and IT professionals. Overall, 28% of respondents had adopted iSCSI,
compared with 18% in 2006. In addition, ESGs research indicates that 24% of respondents plan to use iSCSI SAN
technology in the futureleaving less than half (48%) with no iSCSI implemented or planned. iSCSI is definitely
mainstream, and growing.2
2Source: ESG Research Brief, iSCSI SAN Adoption Update, January 2010.
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
5/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 5
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Figure 3. 2006 vs. 2009 iSCSI SAN Adoption, by Midmarket vs. Enterprise
Source: Enterprise Strategy Group, 2010.
Why the increase? Widespread market acceptance of any technology usually only occurs when that technology has
both broad capabilities and applicability. The basic value proposition of course must be sound, but broad and
increasing adoption signifies a product that can play in multiple markets and segments. iSCSI storage has reached
this level and is now commonly found in both midmarket and enterprise organizations supporting not just test and
development, but Tier 1 applications.3
Server virtualization deployments are also on the rise according to ESG research conducted in March 2009. In 54%
of the enterprise and 32% of the midmarket segments, server virtualization was already in use in production
environments. Only in 24% of both groups was virtualization used solely in test environments. Also, 44% of
midmarket organizations had not deployed virtualization, while only 23% of enterprise organizations had not yet
done so.4
The adoption of iSCSI is tightly correlated with the emergence of server virtualization as a common infrastructure
deployment. In a fall 2009 survey, 55% of iSCSI users said they had deployed iSCSI specificallyto support server
virtualization projects. Server virtualization has helped to move more storage off of DAS and onto the network
with Ethernet being so ubiquitous, iSCSI is a logical choice, particularly for block-based applications such as e-mail
and databases. Not surprisingly, the top three reasons that users deployed iSCSI SANs were storage consolidation,
cost reduction, and server virtualizationall rooted in reducing expenses and improving efficiency.5
The adoption of iSCSI is also being driven by the accelerating adoption of 10 Gigabit Ethernet. An iSCSI storage
system accessed over a 10GbE interface has more bandwidth than a system accessed over 8 Gbps Fibre Channel
interface. This boost in bandwidth is ideally suited for throughput intensive storage applications including data
warehouses, decision support systems and backups. Ethernet can also have a price advantage over Fibre Channel.
Virtualization and data center consolidation have led to top-of-rack and aggregation switches in the data center,
3Ibid.
4Source: ESG Research Brief, Reference Research: x86 Server Virtualization Adoption by Company Size and Number of Servers, March 2009.
5Source: ESG Research Brief, iSCSI SAN Adoption Update, January 2010.
17%18% 18%
25%
29%28%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Midmarket (100 to 999 employees) Enterprise (1,000 employees or more) All respondents
2006 vs. 2009 iSCSI SAN adoption, by midmarket vs. enterprise. (Percent of
respondents)
2006 (N=432) 2009 (N=1,433)
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
6/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 6
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
while increasing network traffic and latency-sensitive content (e.g., video, voice) has driven 10GbE core network
switch sales. As a result, the average price-per-port metric has fallen below the psychologically important $1,000
threshold. These trends will continue for the foreseeable future as 48% of respondents to an ESG survey reported
that they plan on deploying 10 Gbps Ethernet to connect servers to networked storage system over the next 24
months.6
ESG Lab: The Voice of Experience
The analysis presented in the balance of this paper is based on ESGs research and hands-on testing by ESG Lab. Our
analysts have decades of storage and server virtualization experience, including product development, testing, and
real-world application deployment. ESG Lab has tested dozens of storage systems in virtual server environments,
including DAS, SAN, NAS, and iSCSI solutions.
In particular, ESG has been acquainted with EqualLogic since it was founded in 2001 and has tested its arrays
several times since 2003. Most recently, ESG Lab completed hands-on testing and TCO analysis of Dell EqualLogic
solutions in July 2009.7
Dell EqualLogic PS Series iSCSI SAN Solutions
From its inception in 2001, EqualLogic set out with a mission to create simple, affordable SANs; SANs that just
happened to use iSCSI to connect to servers. Much has happened since thenincluding the ratification of the iSCSI
specification in 2004, improvements in network performance, and Dells acquisition of the companybut
EqualLogic has never strayed from its mission. Many generations of arrays and functionality enhancements later,
Dell EqualLogic PS Series SANs have stayed true to their roots: they are simple, affordable, enterprise-class SANs. A
distinct differentiator, however, is the inclusion of all-software functionality in every array at no additional charge.
This is a tremendous benefit as it simplifies management, helps to maintain feature adoption momentum, and
reduces TCO.
At a high level, Dell EqualLogic iSCSI arrays fundamentally change the way organizations purchase and manage
storage. They are built on a patented peer storage architecture that enables components to work together to share
resources, evenly distribute loads, and collaborate to optimize performance and protect data.
The PS Series offers enterprise-class performance and reliability, intelligent automation, and seamless virtualizationof storage for simplified management. Fault-tolerant hardware includes fully hot-swappable, redundant
components and five 9s availability; intelligent automation dramatically simplifies management tasks. SSD, SAS, and
SATA disk drives are supported as well as multiple RAID types for optimizing capacity and performance. Dell
EqualLogic arrays offer all the benefits of storage consolidation (such as better utilization, lower costs, and simpler
management) as well as a modular growth path and automatic load balancing across all resourcesnot just disk,
but also connectivity, cache and controllers. This intelligent storage array offers rapid installation, simple
management, and seamless linear expansion. The flexibility and storage virtualization built into PS Series arrays
allows them to operate effectively in virtual server environments where data movement and flexible connectivity
are essential.
Just as server virtualization can pool server assets and allow for non-disruptive changes to the assets, EqualLogic
storage provides similar decoupling of the logical storage service from the physical hardware. Data can be movedto different hardware while preserving the associated hardware-based snapshot and replication relationships in the
storage. Storage assets can be removed from a pool without downtime and without degrading redundancy,
performance, or snapshot and replication protection. A Dell EqualLogic PS Series iSCSI SAN fully virtualizes storage
across drives, controllers and networks and thus brings the same benefits to storage that VMware brings to servers.
6Source: ESG 2008 Enterprise Storage Systems Survey, November 2008
7See: ESG Lab Report, Dell EqualLogic TCO Analysis, July 2009.
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
7/15
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
8/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 8
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
complicated management and comes with a high price tag. Dell EqualLogic arrays have integrated virtual server
snapshot management capability that enables administrators to ensure virtual machine data protection while
simplifying administration, enabling automatic scheduling, and keeping costs down.
EqualLogic arrays come with Auto-Snapshot Manager/VMware Edition (ASM/VE) and Auto-Snapshot
Manager/Microsoft Editionagain, at no additional cost, of course. These tools are designed to simply create and
centrally manage online, point-in-time copies of virtual machines and data stores using PS Series SAN-based
snapshots. ASM/VE understands the relationships and locations of virtual machines, VMFS Datastores, and PSSeries SAN volumes; the easy-to-use GUI coordinates the creation, recovery, and scheduling of virtual machine
snapshots with vCenter and VMwares native snapshot technology. API-based integration with vCenter delivers
VMFS-consistent snapshots and VM-aware replication. ASM/VE improves the protection, storage utilization, and
performance of VMware-based virtual infrastructures.
Auto-Snapshot Manger/Microsoft Edition software from Dell provides the integration between Microsoft VSS and
the Dell EqualLogic series of storage arrays. ESG Lab has worked with this valuable utility in the lab. As shown in
Figure 5, Auto-snapshot Manager/Microsoft Edition provides a simple, wizard-driven interface which can be used to
create a snapshot, clone, or a replica of applications running in a virtual server environment. The same user
interface can be used to quickly recover an application or an entire Hyper-V virtual machine.
Figure 5. Auto-Snapshot Manager / Microsoft Edition
Source: Enterprise Strategy Group, 2010.
The Auto-Snapshot Manager/Microsoft Edition allows administrators to safely take snapshots of, backup, and
restore Microsoft applications (including Hyper-V virtual machines) with third-party backup software modules by
supporting VSS and VDS interfaces. It can run the database integrity checking tools proactively on the snapshots to
detect database problems early and to have the integrity checking already done ahead of time. It allows application
administrators to perform recoveries using snapshots, leveraging instant restore of the production volumes when
appropriate, without needing to know the details of the storage layout. It eliminates the extensive configuration
and scripting that other systems require when executing snapshot-based backups.
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
9/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 9
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The Case for Networked Storage
While DAS is technically an alternative for virtualized server environments, its not a good option. Server
virtualization enables consolidation and improved utilization, which reduces costs. With DAS, the inability to
consolidate and share storage keeps utilization low, which dramatically increases total cost of ownership. More to
the point, you need networked storage to take full advantage of the benefits of virtualization such as better
flexibility, availability, performance, and mobility. With DAS, storage capacity is held captive within or behind
individual servers. Capacity cannot be moved to another server without downtime and disruption. Also, networked
storage is required to take advantage of the valuable disaster recovery capabilities available from server
virtualization vendors (e.g., VMware Site Recovery Manager).
Virtual server technology deployed with networked storage provides a number of significant benefits when
compared to DAS. The numbers of servers and direct-attached hard drives are reduced, as are space, power, and
cooling requirements. Increased server and storage utilization reduces capital equipment costs. Virtual machine
mobility and shared storage pools enhance availability and serviceability. Finally, managing servers and storage
from a single user interface reduces operational costs.
With DAS out of the picture, you must choose an interface for storage networking. Fibre Channel and Ethernet are
currently the two most viable alternatives. Fibre Channel requires not only specific storage networking hardware,
but a significant investment in administrator training to operate due to complexity. Initial performance concernsabout Ethernet-based storage networks have been dismissed, while Ethernet is more ubiquitous and leverages
existing skill sets and hardware.
If Ethernet is the chosen interface, the next step is choosing between NFS or iSCSI as the protocol used for storage
in the virtual server environment. An important consideration is that most organizations will need a block-based
protocol for applications such as e-mail and databases, making iSCSI attractive. Organizations that dont already use
a file-based protocol dont need to deploy one for server virtualization, but those already using NAS can leverage it
for storage networking.
Thousands of customers are using NFS and iSCSI protocols in virtualized environments and ESG Labs experience has
proven that both are viable. The important decisions are around the entire storage systems features and
capabilities, not which protocol to use for the storage network.
Legacy NAS ConsiderationsImplementing NAS for virtual server images may seem attractive at first, but often adds complexity and cost to the
environment. VMware support for virtual server images accessed using the NFS protocol is a good case in point.
VMware virtual server images (i.e., vmdk files) accessed over the NFS protocol can be managed and optimized by
the storage system (e.g. snapshots can be used for quick recovery). Additional advanced storage functions
including remote mirroring and deduplication can be applied to virtual server images for additional value. This
seems attractive until you realize that similar value can be derived using a full features disk array that accesses
vmdk files over a SAN. As a matter of fact, recent vStorage enhancements in VMware allow VM-level copy,
rollback, locking and remote replication while still leveraging the native VMware file system on top of SAN. Dell
EqualLogic has a rich and growing suite of integrated advanced storage capabilities (e.g. snapshots and remotereplication) that work with VMware APIsand dont require the use of the NFS protocol. It should be noted that
much of the data in a VMware virtual server environment is not stored in vmdk files. A vmdk file is typically used
to store the operating system and application executable files (e.g. the C: drive in a Windows server environment).
Application data, including e-mail and databases, is typically stored on another logical drive using a block protocol
(e.g. iSCSI).
In the past decade, dual-controller, modular systems have become the gold standard for NAS, particularly in the
midmarket. Most of these solutions have evolved to support iSCSI and sometimes other protocols as well. While
this multi-protocol support offers the benefit of serving both block and file storage, some vendors charge license
fees for any protocol after the initial one, such as adding iSCSI to a NAS system. In terms of complexity, many
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
10/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 10
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
organizations already use block-based protocols for e-mail and databases because file-based NAS protocols are not
standard for these applications and are often not supported. Think of it this way: if you already have iSCSI for e-mail
and databases, you can add server virtualization to it, but if you deploy NAS for server virtualization, youll probably
need to add more protocols for your e-mail and database applications.
Complexity vs. Ease of Use
In ESG Labs experience, a Dell EqualLogic iSCSI SAN offers industry-leading ease-of-use when compared to legacymulti-protocol NAS and SAN arrays. ESGs July 2009 TCO analysis compared Dell EqualLogic PS Series iSCSI SANs
leveraging DAS, FC SAN, and multi-protocol NAS arrays. On each of the four system types, ESG Lab measured the
number of mouse clicks and time required to perform typical storage management tasks such as configuring a
system from scratch; moving arrays and storage capacity between storage pools; accessing virtual machine
volumes; and performing copy, replication, and recovery tasks. In that report, it was noted that, Every step of the
way, ESG Lab was impressed with how fast and easy it was to manage a growing pool of EqualLogic storage from a
single, intuitive user interface.8
A complicating factor faced by NAS and FC SAN deployments is managing software licensing. Storage array
management, replication/snapshot functionality, host-based snapshot management, hypervisor integration,
performance analysis, and the like all require individual software licenses that must be managed for each array.
Time-consuming and complicated license management is an enormous headache for IT. With the PS Series, allsoftware functionality is included so there are no licenses to track or manage.
Upgrades and scalability are also complications with NAS (and FC SAN) arrays. Traditional dual-controller, multi-
protocol NAS (and FC SAN) arrays must be sized to meet present and future capacity and performance
requirements. They often require controller upgrades along with software and maintenance charges to meet an
organizations needs for application responsiveness as controllers often reach their performance limits before their
capacity limits. In comparison, EqualLogic arrays offer a virtualized scale out approach in which individual arrays can
be added to a shared storage pool non-disruptively to meet ongoing capacity and performance needs dynamically.
This pay-as-you-grow model is much less costly and far easier to use than traditional dual controller arrays.
Internal file system and protocol overhead can lead to performance issue with traditional NAS arrays. EqualLogic
provides advanced block storage functions which are not dependent on an underlying file system inside thestorage. Native block format inside the storage can make for more consistent performance, especially for database
and e-mail applications with sensitive performance requirements and lots of daily updates.
In addition, as capacity is introduced (disks or arrays) to a PS Series SAN, that capacity is automatically added to the
shared storage pool and rebalanced across all available resources. As a result, disk drives, controllers, ports, cache,
and performance scale linearly with an organizations growth. Simple, non-disruptive growth that virtualizes
storage over a pool of controllers and scales in a linear fashion is a key benefit of Dell EqualLogic arrays especially
when compared to legacy NAS systems which support only a pair of controllers.
Cost
As mentioned previously, ESG Lab analyzed the total cost of ownership over five years for multi-protocol NAS, FC
SAN, EqualLogic iSCSI SAN, and DAS deployments. Analysis was based on a theoretical customer requiringapproximately 80 TB of block-based storage capacity to support common business applications. Acquisition costs
for hardware, software, and connectivity; maintenance costs for hardware and software; and the costs of power
and cooling over five years were consideredin addition, the cost of management was analyzed based on hands-on
testing and conversations with EqualLogic customers. The solutions were configured with three disk tiers and
similar functionality (additional configuration details can be found in the report).9
8Source: ESG Lab Report, Dell EqualLogic TCO Analysis, July 2009.
9See: ESG Lab Report, Dell EqualLogic TCO Analysis, July 2009.
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
11/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 11
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
As shown in Figure 6, the TCO of the NAS system is significantly higher than the Dell EqualLogic iSCSI SAN. In ESG
Labs analysis, every cost area except connectivity was more expensive in the NAS system, while power and cooling
costs were very similar for these two configurations. Overall, the multi-protocol NAS solution costs 167% more.
Figure 6. TCO Comparison: NAS and Dell EqualLogic iSCSI SAN
Source: Enterprise Strategy Group, 2009.
From the start, hardware acquisition costs are higher for the NAS system. Each storage technology was configured
to support remote replication for disaster recovery in the multi-protocol NAS (and FC SAN) solutions. This required
the addition of a second pair of storage controllers and disk drives at the remote site as well as a pair of remote
replication software licenses. In contrast, remote replication is built into the EqualLogic solutions array at no
additional charge. Since individual EqualLogic arrays have their own controllers, they can be deployed locally or
remotely without additional investment in replication software licensing.
The costs of purchasing and maintaining software are key differentiators for EqualLogic. Storage management and
data protection services are included with each PS Series array, while NAS solutions tend to incur additional charges
for advanced management and data protection. As shown, software cost is nonexistent on the EqualLogic side of
the chart. Maintenance costs are also much higher on the NAS sidein part because with the PS Series, no software
maintenance charges are incurred.
In terms of management, ESG Lab calculated the time and effort required to complete numerous tasks on each
system. Tasks included monitoring, planning, provisioning, expanding, setting up and recovering snapshots, setting
up and testing disaster recovery, and configuring storage tiers. ESG Lab calculated the number of hours required to
manage each solution over five years and then calculated the cost of paying a storage administrator based on thehours required. All told, managing the NAS Solution over five years would cost about $187,000, while managing the
Dell EqualLogic solution costs about $105,000.
In summary, the five-year TCO of a multi-protocol NAS system is 2.5 times higher than the TCO for the Dell
EqualLogic solution. ESG hands-on testing and analysis indicates that PS Series arrays are easier to manage, work
well in virtual server environments and cost less.
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
12/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 12
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Legacy SAN Considerations
Complexity vs. Ease of Use
When comparing the FC SAN with a Dell EqualLogic iSCSI SAN, the principle remains that the arrays features,
usability, and affordability matter more than the protocol. However, in the case of Fibre Channel, the storage
network is by definition more complex and costly: it requires specific HBAs on the hosts and SAN switches in the
storage network. Administrators must configure SAN zones, assign LUNs, and configure access control. Ensuringthat arrays have the proper HBA drivers adds yet another level of complexity.
Like legacy NAS system, legacy modular FC SAN systems tend to be more complicated when it comes to upgrades
and scalability. Upgrades often require additional controllers to meet performance and capacity needs as well as
disaster recovery implementations. Legacy FC SANs often have less complete virtualization of RAID and disks inside
the storage, which can require careful planning that would not be required in a more virtualized solution.
Our TCO analysis indicates that legacy SAN solutions are harder to manage than PS Series SANs. In fact, ESGs
analysis indicates that a legacy FC SAN takes more than twice the manpower to manage as a Dell EqualLogic iSCSI
solution. Additional time and effort are required to wire, zone, and configure access control after the SAN changes
as well.10
Cost
Key factors in FC SAN deployments are the cost of Fibre Channel switches and HBAs for every host. These add
significantly to acquisition and ongoing maintenance expenses. As shown in Figure 7, the cost differential between
the FC SAN and the Dell EqualLogic SAN over five years is significant. For the entire cost of a PS Series SAN, you
could purchase only the hardware for a FC SAN without any advanced software functionality. Power and cooling
costs are similar, but connectivity and maintenance are much more expensive on the FC side. Finally, the
complexity of managing the FC infrastructure makes it more than twice as expensive as a simple, intuitive Dell
EqualLogic system. Overall, our analysis indicates that the five-year TCO for a Fibre Channel SAN is three times that
of a similarly deployed Dell EqualLogic iSCSI SAN.
Figure 7. TCO Comparison: FC SAN and Dell EqualLogic iSCSI SAN
Source: Enterprise Strategy Group, 2010.
10Source: ESG Lab Report, Dell EqualLogic TCO Analysis, July 2009.
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
13/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 13
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
The Bigger Truth
ESGs 2010 IT spending intentions survey indicates that increasing server virtualization and improving data
protection top the list of IT priorities. With these priorities in mind, care should be taken when choosing which
storage system will support a growing virtual server environment. Direct attached storage is inflexible, inefficient,
and complex to manage in growing virtual server environments. For the utmost in flexibility and availability,
networked storage is clearly the way to go.
ESGs analysis indicates that the storage networking protocol chosen for a virtual server environment is of little
importance. What matters more is whether the storage solution is cost effective and easy to manage. Advanced
functionality is important as well. In virtual server environments, it is important that the storage infrastructure
provide not just basic storage and retrieval, but complete data protection including the ability to roll back in time
and recover easily. As server and application administrators are increasingly being asked to handle storage and
virtual server environments, automation and ease of use matter more than ever.
Dell EqualLogic PS Series iSCSI SAN solutions are ideally suited to meet the storage needs in a growing virtual server
environment. With a clustered architecture that leverages industry standard server and Ethernet technologies, a PS
Series SAN bring the benefits of server virtualization to the storage domain as it fully virtualizes storage across
drives, controllers and networks.
ESG Labs five-year TCO analysis indicates that acquisition costs for multi-protocol NAS and FC SAN solutions are
more than twice those of a comparably equipped Dell EqualLogic system (217% and 272%, respectively).
EqualLogics iSCSI approach and disruptive pricing model, including valuable storage software at no additional
charge, are key to those differences. ESGs analysis indicates that a multi-protocol NAS system is 2.5x the TCO for
EqualLogic, FC SAN is 3X, and DAS is 1.4x.
Figure 8. The Dell EqualLogic Cost Advantage
Source: Enterprise Strategy Group, 2010.
Based on this evaluation, ESG believes that the Dell EqualLogic PS Series offers a distinct advantage for virtual
server environments. As Figure 8 demonstrates, DAS may initially cost less for small virtual server deployments, but
it lacks flexibility and high availability. Cost and complexity will increase exponentially as the number of virtual
machines grows. At some point, managing many islands of storage makes the solution cost prohibitive. Networked
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
14/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 14
2010, Enterprise Strategy Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
modular Fibre Channel and NAS solutions reduce costs as the number of virtual machines increases, but the need to
add new dual controllers to accommodate growth increases cost and complexity in steps. In contrast, our analysis
has proven that the Dell EqualLogic iSCSI SANs offer the lowest TCO. Dell EqualLogic PS Series arrays are easy to
use and affordable, avoid the step increases in cost and complexity, and are less than half the cost of NAS for the 75
TB solution analyzed by ESG. Last, but not least, note that as the number of virtual machines continues to grow,
Dell EqualLogic widens the gap and accelerates the savings with on-demand expansion and easy management.
While its been shown that iSCSI, Fibre Channel, and NAS systems are all viable options in a virtual serverenvironment, it should be noted that iSCSI is quickly becoming the interface of choice. ESG recently asked 318
North America-based IT professionals within enterprise and midmarket organizations which storage technologies
they currently use to support their virtual sever environment: 73% reported using iSCSI compared to 52% for FC,
38% for DAS, and 37% for NAS.11
From ESGs perspective, the message is clear. If you are considering a storage solution for your virtual server
environment, do your own analysis. Be aware that some vendors are pushing NAS for virtual server environments
and touting its benefits: consolidating and sharing storage; higher utilization and lower cost; and the flexibility,
mobility, and performance to take full advantage of server virtualization. Be cognizant of the fact that those
benefits are the same for any networked storage solution. NAS is not necessary for server virtualizationiSCSI,
Fibre Channel, and NAS will all work and even DAS is possible. And since most organizations need block-based
storage for other applications anyway, NAS on its own may not be able to meet all of your storage needs in a virtualserver environment. An iSCSI or FC SAN may be needed as well.
Dont get hung up on the particular protocol or featureconsider the whole storage solution and then schedule an
evaluation of the Dell EqualLogic PS Series. Youll be glad you did.
11Source: ESG Research Report, iSCSI SAN Usage in Virtual Server Environments, December 2009.
8/2/2019 ESG White Paper Dell Equal Logic Optimizing Server Virtualization May 2010
15/15
White Paper: Optimizing Server Virtualization with Cost-Effective, Enterprise-Class Storage 15
20 Asylum Street | Milford, MA 01757 | Tel:508.482.0188 Fax: 508.482.0218 | www.enterprisestrategygroup.com