Post on 29-May-2020
ENHANCING THE RESILIENCE OF BT COWPEA [VIGNA UNGUICULATA (L.) WALP] FOR INSECT
RESISTANCE MANAGEMENT
Bosibori Bwari Bett
(BSc., MSc.)
School of Earth, Environmental and Biological Sciences
Science and Engineering Faculty
SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
BRISBANE, AUSTRALIA
2016
ii
Keywords
Cowpeas, Bacillus thuringiensis, Bt, Vegetative insecticidal proteins (vips), vip3 genes,
Maruca, Maruca pod borer (MPB), Insect resistance management, Agrobacterium‐
mediated transformation, Insect bioassays
iii
ABSTRACT
Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] is an important food security crop that is grown
in all tropical areas. Africa is the main producer with annual production of over 5 million
tonnes. Cowpea is a drought‐tolerant crop that plays a major role in the diets of people
living in the developing world especially in West Africa where it is used as food for
human consumption and as animal feed. The dry seeds are used as a grain and are high
in protein, amounting to 25 % of dry weight. It is also a major source of essential
vitamins and minerals.
Despite its importance as a food security crop, the production of cowpea is constrained
by many factors including insect pests and diseases. The insect pests are of major
concern causing considerable economic losses. One such pest is the legume pod borer
(Maruca vitrata) (Lepidoptera), also known as the Maruca Pod Borer (MPB), which is
responsible for yield losses of up to 50 % in the field. Although breeding for host plant
resistance is currently the main way of controlling the problem of pests and diseases in
cowpea, this approach is not yet possible for MPB as no genes for resistance to Maruca
have been identified in cowpea germplasm. Therefore, control strategies have focussed
on biological control using strains of the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) which
contains insecticidal toxins such as the crystal (Cry) proteins and vegetative insecticidal
proteins (Vips) encoded by the cry and vip genes, respectively.
A cry gene has previously been used to develop cowpeas resistant to Maruca by
researchers at CSIRO, Canberra. This line contains a cry1Ab gene and was shown to be
effective against Maruca in the field in West Africa. However, since insects can develop
resistance to a single Bt protein, the generation of transgenic plants containing two or
more Bt genes is a common strategy used to reduce the likelihood of resistance
occurring and thus improve insect resistance management (IRM). Since the Cry and Vip
proteins have different mechanisms of action, it has been hypothesised that the genes
encoding these proteins would represent suitable targets for gene stacking in the
generation of transgenic cowpea. The main aim of this study, therefore, was to identify a
vip gene with toxicity to MPB and to generate MPB‐resistant transgenic cowpea. Such a
iv
gene could be used to complement the current cry transgene and ultimately enhance
the long term sustainability of a Maruca‐resistant transgenic cowpea.
The initial part of the research project involved the identification of vip gene(s) from
Australian Bt isolates that encode toxins active against MPB. Considering the abundance
of vip3 genes in the database, a bioinformatics approach was initially used to identify a
diverse range of Vip3 proteins as candidates for expression and testing for insecticidal
activity against MPB. Based on the amino acid sequence analyses of published Vip
sequences, five diverse vip3 genes were selected for further analysis, namely vip3Aa35,
vip3Af1, vip3Ag, vip3Ca2 and vip3Ba1. A collection of 224 Bt isolates was screened with
gene‐specific primers to identify those containing the target genes. Out of these, 78
strains were confirmed to contain vip3A genes. Out of 165 strains screened at random, 8
were found to contain vip3B genes. No Bt strain(s) in the collection were found to
contain vip3C genes. Primers were designed to isolate the coding sequences of
vip3Aa35, vip3Af1, vip3Ag, vip3Ca2 and vip3Ba1 by PCR. This method was successful for
three out of five of these genes, while vip3Af1 and vip3Ca2 were chemically synthesized.
The coding sequences of the vip3 genes were cloned and over‐expressed in Escherichia
coli to produce Vip3 protein. The soluble and insoluble fractions of the Vip3 proteins
were analysed by SDS‐PAGE. The Vip3A and Vip3C proteins were present in the insoluble
fraction while Vip3B protein was present in the soluble and insoluble fractions. An
MS/MS analysis was carried out on the Vip3 protein bands and showed that they were
indeed the target Vips. The respective Vip3 proteins were incorporated into Maruca
artificial diets at 0, 3, 10, 30 and 100 µg toxin per g for use in insect bioassays with MPB
larvae to screen for toxicity. Of these, Vip3Ba1 protein was found to inhibit larval growth
by over 90 % and was therefore selected as the candidate gene for cowpea
transformation.
The second component of this study focussed on reconstructing the vip3Ba gene for
plant expression and then transforming cowpea using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. The
coding region of the vip3Ba gene was optimized by increasing the GC content from
approximately 30 % to 50 %, and deleting the eight potential polyadenylation sites and
twelve mRNA destabilizing sequence motifs. The codons were also optimized to enhance
translation in dicots. A modified version of a previous protocol developed at CSIRO was
v
used to transform cowpea. The modifications included omitting certain key plant
hormones in the growth media, a stringent antibiotic selection regime involving two
different antibiotics, and employing sonication techniques to permeate the plant cell
wall to facilitate Agrobacterium‐mediated T‐DNA transfer. Out of 6696 cowpea explants
transformed with the reconstructed vip3Ba gene, a total of 73 independent transgenic
lines were generated (a transformation frequency of just over 1 %). Further analysis of
T1 progeny revealed that nine transgenic lines expressed the vip3Ba gene at varying
levels. Of these, four lines were selected for further experiments based on the fact that
variation in Vip3Ba expression between the four lines could serve to determine whether
insect mortality was dependent on toxin dosage. There was 100 % mortality of larvae
feeding on transgenic cowpea leaves.
The results of this study demonstrate for the first time that the growth of MPB is
severely inhibited by low levels of Vip3Ba protein. Additionally, transgenic lines
developed in this work were completely protected from MPB, confirming that Vip3Ba is
a very effective toxin for the control of MPB larvae at least in the lab. The outcome of
this study identified vip3Ba gene as a potential candidate to complement cry genes in
the development of Bt cowpeas resistant to MPB, thus contributing to an effective
strategy for insect resistance management. The introgression of this additional
resistance trait into the existing cry‐1Ab cowpea would considerably reduce the
likelihood or greatly delay the development of resistance in MPB, help to increase yield
and income, and reduce the dependency on pesticides.
vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Keywords……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...
ii
Abstract ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
iii
Table of Contents …………………………………………………………………………………………………
vi
List of Figures ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
xi
List of Tables ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….
xiv
List of Abbreviations ……………………………………………………………………………………………
xvi
Declaration ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
xix
Acknowledgements …………………………………………………………………………………………….
xx
Dedication ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
xxiv
Chapter One: Introduction and Literature review …………………………………………………
1
1.1 Cowpea …………………………………………………………………………………………………….
1
1.2 Cowpea taxonomy and morphology …………………………………………………………
1
1.3 Cowpea cultivation ………………………………………………………………………………….
3
1.4 Cowpea production constraints ……………………………………………………………….
3
1.4.1 Diseases …………………………………………………………………………………………
3
1.4.2 Weeds ……………………………………………………………………………………………
5
1.4.3 Insect pests ……………………………………………………………………………………
6
1.4.3.1 Storage pests …………………………………………………………………….
6
1.4.3.2 Pre‐flowering pests …………………………………………………………….
6
1.4.3.3 Post‐flowering pests …………………………………………………………….
7
1.5 The legume pod borer ………………………………………………………………………………
7
1.6 Justification for transgenic approaches …………………………………………………….
8
1.7 The use of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) as an insect control strategy …………... 11
vii
1.7.1 Bt insecticidal proteins ……………………………………………………………………..
13
1.7.1.1 Crystal (Cry) proteins …………………………………………………………..
13
1.7.1.2 Vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vips) ………………………………….
13
1.7.2 Bt transgenic crops ………………………………………………………………………..
15
1.7.3 Insect Resistance Management ………………………………………………………..
16
1.8 Research Hypothesis …………………………………………………………………………………
19
1.9 Research Objectives ………………………………………………………………………………….
19
2.0 Expected output .........................................................................................
20
Chapter Two: General Materials and Methods .......................................................
21
2.1 Preparation of bacterial cultures ................................................................
21
2.1.1 Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cultures .......................................................
21
2.1.2 Preparation of Mannitol Glutamate Luria (MGL) culture medium for Agrobacterium tumefaciens .............................................................................
21
2.2 Isolation of bacterial DNA ...........................................................................
22
2.2.1 Isolation of genomic DNA from Bacillus thuringiensis .........................
22
2.2.2 Isolation of plasmid DNA from Escherichia coli and Agrobacterium tumefaciens .....................................................................................................
22
2.3 Purification of PCR products .......................................................................
22
2.4 Cloning of vip genes ....................................................................................
22
2.4.1 Expresso™ T7 Cloning and Expression System .................................................
23
2.4.2 The Gibson assembly method of DNA cloning .................................................
23
2.5 Sequencing of vip3 genes cloned in E. coli ...................................................
24
2.6 Preparation of electrocompetent Agrobacterium (AGL1) cells ....................
24
2.7 Transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (AGL1) cells .......................
25
viii
2.8 Transformation of E. coli cells .....................................................................
25
2.9 Protein expression and analysis ..................................................................
26
2.10 Identification of Vip protein using Mass Spectrometry …………………………....
29
2.11 Maintenance of a Maruca vitrata insect colony in vitro .............................
29
2.11.1 Preparation of Maruca artificial diet ...................................................
29
2.11.2 Preparation of Honey solution for Maruca adults ...............................
31
2.11.3 Preparation of honey pots for feeding adults whilst in cages ..............
31
2.11.4 Procedures for egg collection ..............................................................
32
2.11.5 Rearing of Maruca larvae .....................................................................
32
2.12 Preparation of plant tissue culture media ...................................................
35
2.12.1 Preparation of MS Stock solutions .......................................................
35
2.12.2 Preparation of hormones, antibiotics and other agents ......................
36
2.12.3 Cowpea suspension medium (for co‐cultivation) ................................
36
2.12.4 Cowpea shoot induction medium …………………………………………………….
36
2.12.5 Cowpea shoot elongation and rooting medium ……………………………….
37
2.13 Isolation of plant genomic DNA ..................................................................
37
2.14 Protocol for PCR analysis of transgenic cowpea lines ..................................
38
2.15 Detection of Vip3Ba protein by western blotting ........................................
38
Chapter Three: Toxicity of Vip3 proteins to the legume pod borer Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera) .........................................................................................................
40
3.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................
40
3.2 Materials and Methods ..............................................................................
41
3.2.1 Bacterial strains ...................................................................................
41
3.2.2 PCR ....................................................................................................... 41
ix
3.2.3 Cloning of vip3 and cry2Aa genes in E. coli ..........................................
43
3.2.4 Protein expression and analysis ...........................................................
44
3.2.5 Insect bioassays ....................................................................................
44
3.3 Results .......................................................................................................
45
3.3.1 Selection of candidate vip3 genes ........................................................
45
3.3.2 Confirmation of Bt strains ....................................................................
46
3.3.3 Identification of Bt strains containing candidate vip3 genes ...............
48
3.3.4 Expression of vip3 genes in E. coli ........................................................
50
3.3.5 Insect bioassays ....................................................................................
52
3.4 Discussion ..................................................................................................
59
Chapter Four: Transgenic cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) expressing Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) Vip3Ba protein to protect against the Maruca pod borer (Maruca vitrata) ....................................................................................................
63
4.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................
63
4.2 Materials and methods ..............................................................................
65
4.2.1 Construction of a Vip3Ba gene for plant expression ............................
65
4.2.2 Transformation of cowpea ...................................................................
66
4.2.2.1 Preparation of Agrobacterium culture .....................................
66
4.2.2.2 Preparation of cowpea explants and Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation .....................................................................
66
4.2.2.3 Regeneration and maintenance of cowpea cultures ...............
68
4.2.3 Detection of vip3Ba and nptII genes in the transgenic plants .............
69
4.2.4 Detection and estimation of Vip3Ba expression in transgenic plants ...........................................................................................................................
70
4.2.5 Insect bioassays using transgenic leaf material ...................................
70
4.3 Results ....................................................................................................... 71
x
4.3.1 Reconstruction of the vip3Ba gene for cowpea transformation ..........
71
4.3.2 Transformation and regeneration of cowpea with the optimized vip3Ba gene ......................................................................................................
75
4.3.3 Characterization of transgenic lines by PCR .........................................
78
4.3.4 Expression of Vip3Ba in T1 and T2 generations .....................................
78
4.3.5 Efficacy of transgenic lines expressing Vip3Ba protein on MPB larvae ...........................................................................................................................
87
4.4. Discussion ...................................................................................................
89
Chapter Five: General Discussion and Conclusions .................................................
93
Chapter Six: References .........................................................................................
98
APPENDICES ...........................................................................................................
123
APPENDIX I: SUMMARY OF vip3 GENES SEQUENCING RESULTS ..................................
123
APPENDIX II: The DNA sequence of the vip3Ba gene modified for expression in plants ............................................................................................................................
143
APPENDIX III: Sequence alignment of vip3Ba gene (optimized cowpea version vs the original bacterial version)
145
xi
LIST OF FIGURES
Fig. 1.1: Cowpea dry seed used as a grain (Photo credit: Carl Davies) …………………….
2
Fig. 1.2: Cowpea field showing fresh leaf and pods (Photo credit: Jeff Ehlers) .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….......... 4
Fig. 1.3: Cowpea infestation by Maruca pod borer. (A) Larvae attacking cowpea flower and (B) damaged cowpea pod..............................................................................
9
Fig. 1.4: Mode of action of Bt crystal toxins …………………………………………………………….
12
Fig. 1.5: Classification of vegetative insecticidal proteins believed to share a common three domain structure …………………………………………………………………………….
14
Fig. 2.1: Protein extraction flow chart …………………………………………………………………….
28
Fig. 2.2: General procedure for Maruca rearing and maintenance ………………………......
33
Fig. 2.3: Balconies in artificial diet placed in a larger lunch box ……………………………....
34
Fig. 2.4: Preparation of cages for emerging adults. (A) Set up of vermiculite and honey pots. (B) cage covered with nappy liners and lid for egg collection ………………….
34
Fig. 3.1: Identification of putative Bt strains by PCR using PI‐PLC primers. Lane M: DNA Molecular marker; Lanes 1 to 10: DNA template from ten putative Bt strains; N: water (negative control); P: DNA from Bt strain kurstaki (positive control) …………........
47
Fig. 3.2: Identification of Bt strains carrying vip3A genes by PCR. Lane M: DNA Molecular marker; Lanes 1 to 10: DNA template from 10 Bt strains; N: water (negative control); P: bacterial DNA harbouring a vip3Aa gene (positive control) ……...
49
Fig. 3.3: Identification of Bt strains carrying vip3B genes by PCR. Lane M: DNA Molecular marker; Lanes 108 to 117: DNA template from 10 Bt strains; N: water (negative) control and P: plasmid DNA containing the vip3Bb2 gene (positive control) …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….................
49
Fig. 3.4: SDS‐PAGE analysis of Vip3 and Cry2Aa proteins expressed in E. coli. Panels A‐F are stained gels from studies involving the expression of Vip3Aa35, Vip3Af1, Vip3Ag, Vip3Ca2, Vip3Ba1 and Cry2Aa, respectively. Lane M: Protein molecular weight marker (kDa). Lane 1: Soluble protein fraction of untransformed E. coli. Lane 2: Soluble protein fraction of E. coli transformed with its respective vip or cry gene. Lane 3: Insoluble protein fraction of untransformed E. coli. Lane 4: Insoluble protein fraction of E. coli transformed with its respective vip or cry gene .........................................................................................................................................
54
Fig. 3.5: The full Vip3Ba amino acid sequence. The highly conserved cysteine regions
xii
are highlighted in yellow, while the predicted disulphide bonding is highlighted in green (Ceroni et al., 2006)...............................................................................................
56
Fig. 3.6: Maruca larvae after 10 days feeding on artificial diet with and without Bt toxin. (A): Larvae on a diet containing no Bt toxin (0 µg toxin per g diet), (B) Larvae on a diet containing 3 µg of Vip3Ba toxin per g of diet ..................................................
57
Fig. 3.7: Effect of Vip and Cry2Aa proteins on the average weight of surviving MPB larvae after 10 days on artificial diets. (A): Group 1 (Vip3Aa35) and Cry2Aa proteins, (B): Group 2 (Vip3Af1) and Cry2Aa proteins, (C): Group 3 (Vip3Ag) and Cry2Aa proteins, (D): Group 4 (Vip3Ca2) and Cry2Aa proteins and (E): Group 5 (Vip3Ba1) and Cry2Aa proteins...............................................................................................................
58
Fig. 4.1: Schematic diagram of the Agrobacterium binary vector T‐DNA; LB, RB: left and right borders of Agrobacterium T‐DNA, respectively. The antibiotic selection gene neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) from E. coli was flanked by the S1 promoter derived from segment 1 of the subterranean clover stunt virus (SCSV) genome and segment 3 (S3) 3′ end while the op mized coding region of the vip3Ba gene was flanked by the Arabidopsis thaliana small subunit (AraSSU) promoter and Nicotiana tabacum small subunit (TobSSU) 3′ end ……………………………………………………...................................................................................
72
Fig. 4.2: Plasmid map showing unique restriction sites in the pVip3Ba construct used in the transformation of cowpea.......................................................................
73
Fig. 4.3: Confirmation of the Vip3Ba cassette in the Agrobacterium binary vector by restriction digestion. Lane M: DNA Molecular ladder; Lanes 1 and 2: Agrobacterium DNA digested with the enzymes EcoRV and PvuII resulting in the expected four fragments of 1.5, 2.7, 4.4 and 6.4 kb, respectively …………………………………………………….
74
Fig. 4.4: Cowpea explants used for transformation. (A) Cotyledons with attached axes that had their radicle tips removed (arrows) ready for infection with Agrobacterium and (B) after co‐cultivation with Agrobacterium for 3 days ……………....
76
Fig. 4.5: In vitro regeneration of cowpea following co‐cultivation with Agrobacterium. (A) Cowpea explant with cotyledon and primary shoots on shoot induction medium with selection at 2 weeks (B) trimmed explant with cotyledon and primary shoot removed at 4 weeks (C) multiple shoots formed on callus (D) single shoots formed on shoot induction medium with 30 mg/L geneticin at 8 weeks (E) shoots grown on medium with 30 mg/L geneticin at 10 weeks, (F) individual shoots in elongation and rooting medium at 14 weeks and (G) rooted plants in the soil at 16 weeks ………………………………………………………………………………………………………....................
77
Fig. 4.6: PCR analysis of 10 putative transgenic cowpea lines using (A) vip3Ba‐specific primers designed to amplify a 187 bp product and (B) nptII‐specific primers designed to amplify a 970 bp product. Lane M: DNA Molecular marker; Lane N: water (negative control); Lane P: Plasmid DNA of the optimized gene construct
xiii
(positive control); numbers above other lanes represent the line number of randomly selected transgenic cowpeas used for PCR analysis ……………………………...........................................................................................................
79
Fig. 4.7: Western blots using a monoclonal antibody to Vip3Ba showing the levels of Vip3Ba in seven cowpea lines using varying levels of Vip3Ba expressed in E. coli as standards. In both blots, Lane M is the protein molecular weight ladder. Lanes L1 to L5 represent E. coli expressed Vip3Ba loaded at 100, 50, 25, 12.5 and 6.25 ng per lane, respectively. Blot A includes protein (40µg/lane) from cowpea lines 9, 24, 25 and 43 while Blot B includes protein (40µg/lane) from lines 56, 87 and 107..................
82
Fig. 4.8: Western blot analysis to determine Vip3Ba expression in transgenic cowpea lines using a monoclonal antibody to Vip3Ba. Blot A: Line V24: Lane M: Protein precision markers; Lanes 1 to 6: TSP (40 µg) extract from six T2 plants; Lanes 7 to 9: 30 ng, 100 ng and 300 ng protein from E. coli expressing Vip3Ba protein (positive control). Blot B: Line V25: Lanes 1 to 8: TSP (40 µg) extract from eight T1 plants; Lanes 9 to 10: 10 ng and 30 ng protein from E. coli expressing Vip3Ba protein (positive control). Blot C: Line V43: Lane M: Protein precision markers; Lanes 1 to 6: TSP (40 µg) from six T2 plants; Lanes 7 to 9: 30 ng, 100 ng and 300 ng protein from E. coli expressing Vip3Ba protein (positive control). Blot D: Line V87: Lane M: Protein precision markers; Lanes 1 to 5: TSP (40 µg) from five T2 plants; Lanes 6 to 9: 10 ng, 30 ng, 100 ng and 300 ng Vip protein from E. coli expressing Vip3Ba protein (positive control). Vip3Ba band migrates at ~75 kDa ………………………............................................
84
Fig. 4.9: Phenotypes of selected transgenic T1 cowpea lines expressing Vip3Ba protein at different ages. (A) Line V24‐2 at 3 weeks after sowing; (B) Line V25‐8 at 2 weeks after sowing; (C) Line V43‐11 at 2 ½ months after sowing; (D) Line V87‐3 at 3 weeks after sowing and; (E) 3‐week old negative segregants of lines V43 and V87 .........................................................................................................................................
85
Fig. 4.10: Leaf damage after 10 days of feeding by Maruca larvae on non‐transgenic line IT86D and transgenic lines expressing Cry 1Ab or Vip3Ba protein. A: Line 709A (expressing Cry 1Ab), B: Line V24, C: Line V25, D: Line V43, E: Line V87, F, G, H: Line IT86D ...............................................................................................................................
88
xiv
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1: Ingredients for bacterial MGL medium …………………………………………………
21
Table 2.2: Ingredients for YMB medium ……………………………………………………………….
25
Table 2.3: Ingredients for Auto‐induction medium, pH 6.9 (for 500 mL) ……………….
27
Table 2.4: Constituents of 1000 X Trace minerals (for 500 mL) ...............................
27
Table 2.5: Ingredients for Maruca artificial diet .....................................................
30
Table 2.6: Ingredients to make 100 g Wesson salt mixture .....................................
30
Table 2.7: Ingredients to make 100 mL Vitamin solution ........................................
31
Table 2.8: Ingredients for the preparation of honey solution .................................
31
Table 2.9: Components to prepare MS Macro stock solutions ................................
35
Table 2.10: Components to prepare cowpea suspension medium ..........................
36
Table 2.11: Components to prepare cowpea shoot induction medium (SIM) and cowpea shoot elongation and rooting medium (SEM) ............................................
37
Table 3.1: Primers used in this study: The underlined nucleotides in primer pairs of PCR set C define 6 His codons of the vector sequence ........................................
42
Table 3.2: Grouping of Vip3 proteins on the basis of amino acid sequence identity with reference protein Vip3Aa35 ...........................................................................
46
Table 3.3: Examples of Bt strains harbouring target vip3 genes ..............................
51
Table 3.4: DNA sequence analysis of target vip3 genes from groups 1 to 5 (with the His tag sequences deleted) ..............................................................................
51
Table 3.5: MS/MS identification of the putative Vip3 proteins expressed in E. coli ...............................................................................................................................
55
Table 4.1: Modifications of the transformation system used for cowpea ...............
67
Table 4.2: Outline of steps in cowpea transformation with the plant‐optimized vip3Ba gene ...........................................................................................................
69
Table 4.3: Primer sequences for the detection of nptII and vip3Ba genes in transgenic plants ...................................................................................................
70
xv
Table 4.4: A comparison of the vip3Ba gene from Bt with the version optimized for expression in plants .........................................................................................
72
Table 4.5: Summary of the molecular analysis of transgenic cowpea lines .............
80
Table 4.6: Summary of average Vip3Ba protein levels in the 4 selected independent transgenic cowpea lines (1st or 2nd generation progeny) ……………..................................................................................................................
80
Table 4.7: Levels of Vip3Ba toxin in the T1 progeny of seven cowpea lines..............
83
Table 4.8: Summary of average Vip3Ba protein levels in the 4 selected independent transgenic cowpea lines (1st or 2nd generation progeny) ....................
87
xvi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ADP Adenosine diphosphate
AIRS Aminoimidazole ribonucleotide synthetase
AraSSU Arabidopsis small subunit
AT Adenine, Thymine
BAP Benzylaminopurine
BCIP 5‐bromo‐4‐chloro‐3‐indolyl phosphate
BICMV Blackeye cowpea mosaic virus
BLAST Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
bp Base pair(s)
Bt Bacillus thuringiensis
CaCl2.2H2O Calcium chloride dihydrate
CaMV Cauliflower mosaic virus
CDS Coding Sequence
CG Cytosine, Guanine
CoCl2 Cobalt (II) chloride
CoCl2.6H2O Cobalt (II) chloride hexahydrate
Cry Crystal
CTCB Centre for Tropical Crops and Biocommodities
CuSO4 Copper (II) sulfate
CuCl2.2H2O Copper (II) chloride dihydrate
CMV Cucumber mosaic virus
CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
CYMV Cowpea yellow mosaic virus
dATP Deoxyadenosine triphosphate
dCTP Deoxycytidine triphosphate
dH2O Distilled water
dGTP Deoxyguanosine triphosphate
DNA Deoxyribunucleic acid
dNTP(s) Deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate(s)
DTT Dithiothreitol
dTTP Deoxythymidine triphosphate
dH2O Distilled water
EBI European Bioinformatics Institute
E. coli Escherichia coli
EDTA Ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid
EMBOSS European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite
FASTA Fast‐All
FAOSTAT Food and Agricultural Organisation statistics
FeCl3 Iron (III) chloride
g Gram(s)
GA3 Gibberelic acid
GC Guanine Cytosine
GM Genetic modification/Genetically modified
xvii
GUS β‐glucuronidase
HDR Higher Degree Research
Hr(s) Hour(s)
H3BO3 Boric acid
H3BO4 Perboric acid
IAA indole‐3‐acetic acid
IITA International Institute of Tropical Agriculture
IRM Insect Resistance Management
K2HPO4 Dipotassium phosphate
kb kilo base
kbp kilo basepairs
kDa kilo Dalton
KH2PO4 Monopotassium phosphate
KI Potassium iodide
KNO3 Potassium nitrate
KOH Potassium hydroxide
L Litre(s)
LA Luria Agar
LB Luria Bertani
mL Millilitres
MES Morpholine‐4‐ethanesulfonic acid
MGL Mannitol Glutamate Luria
MgSO4 Magnesium sulfate
MgSO4.7H20 Magnesium sulphate heptahydrate
Min(s) Minute(s)
MnCl2 Manganese (II) chloride
MOPS (3‐(N‐morpholino) propanesulfonic acid)
MPB Maruca Pod Borer
mRNA Messenger RNA
MS Murashige and Skoog
MS/MS Tandem mass spectrometry
MW Molecular Weight
NaCl Sodium chloride
NAD Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
Na2EDTA Disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
Na2MoO4 Sodium molybdate
Na2MoO4.2H20 Molybdic acid sodium salt dihydrate
NaOH Sodium hydroxide
NaSeO3 Sodium selenite
Na2SO4 Sodium sulfate
NBF(s) National Biosafety Framework(s)
NBT Nitro blue tetrazolium chloride
NCBI National Centre for Biotechnology Information
NH4Cl Ammonium chloride
NH4NO3 Ammonium nitrate
xviii
NiCl2.6H2O Nickel (II) chloride hexahydrate
Npt Neomycin transferase
OD Optical Density
ORF(s) Open Reading Frame(s)
PCR Polymerase chain reaction
pH Power of hydrogen ion concentration
PI‐PLC Phosphatidylinositol‐specific phospholipase C
PMSF Phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride
PTGS Post transcriptional gene silencing
QTL(s) Quantitative Trait Loci
QUT Queensland University of Technology
RNA Ribonucleic acid
RO Reverse Osmosis
RPM Revolutions per minute
S Seconds
SCSV Subterranean clover stunt virus
SDS‐PAGE Sodium‐dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
SOC Super Optimal broth Catabolite repression
SYBR N',N'‐dimethyl‐N‐[4‐[(E)‐(3‐methyl‐1,3‐benzothiazol‐2‐ylidene)methyl]‐1‐phenylquinolin‐1‐ium‐2‐yl]‐N‐propylpropane‐1,3‐diamine
TBS Tris‐buffered saline
TE Tris EDTA
TES N‐[Tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl]‐2‐aminoethanesulfonic acid
TGS Transcriptional gene silencing
TobSSU Tobacco small subunit
TTBS Tris‐Buffered Saline and Tween 20
Vip(s) Vegetative Insecticidal Protein(s)
YMB Yeast Mannitol Broth
ZnSO4.7H2O Zinc sulphate, Heptahydrate
µg Microgram(s)
µL Microlitre(s)
xix
Declaration
The work contained within this thesis has not been previously submitted for a
degree or diploma at any other higher education institution. To the best of my
knowledge and belief, this thesis contains no material previously published or
written by another person except where due reference is made.
Signed: QUT Verified Signature
Date: July 2016
xx
Acknowledgements
First I thank the almighty God for granting me good health and peace. I thank Him for
taking me this far.
I thank my dear family – my husband Mohammed Bett Soi, my sons Andrew Bett and
Samuel Bett, and my daughter Abigail Bett, for their unending support. Dear Abigail,
thank you for realising that mummy had to write her thesis by spending most of your
time asleep, what a wonderful baby you are. Dear Andrew and Samuel, thank you for
being obedient and for knowing that mummy had to finish quickly, hence the reason I
could not accompany you to the park sometimes. This kept mummy going. Dear
Mohammed, thank you for your love, support, encouragement and prayers. Thanks for
stepping in for me when I was in the lab. I will forever cherish this. I also thank my
parents, Andrew & Rose Michieka and Elijah & Eunice Soi for their constant phone calls,
prayers and encouragement. I thank Yvette and Yvonne for the endless support.
I would like to thank the Australians, particularly their government, for offering me the
prestigious AusAID scholarship to pursue my PhD studies. To the ILRI/BecA hub and
CSIRO staff – Santie, Leena, Segenet, Jagger, Rob, Appolinnaire and Bruce Pengelley
thank you for paving the way for my success.
I would like to appreciate my supervisors Prof. TJ Higgins of CSIRO and Prof. Rob
Harding. Dear TJ and dear Rob: First, when I decided to take up the scholarship, I knew
that I needed an expert in legume (cowpea) technology at CSIRO and, also, I was keen to
get enrolment at QUT. With the constant communications we had, I was certain that my
PhD studies would commence, and you therefore made it possible for me to integrate
into both organizations. Thank you for accepting me as your student, for all the
administrative procedures and, for mentoring me. Secondly, when I began my studies, I
thought I knew how to write. Only to realize that with your supervision, there was a
perfect way of doing it. Thanks for opening my eyes by constantly guiding me and
correcting the many mistakes I made in my presentations and in the whole writing
process. Dear TJ, I used to wonder how I would complete one experiment after another
without mental stress, only to realize that you provided ALL funds for my research
project. I therefore lacked NOTHING and was able to accomplish the objectives of my
xxi
work. I am fully indebted to you. Dear Rob, thank you for toiling with me during my last
days in Australia when I was writing up, by going out of your way to secure a QUT/CTCB
contribution to research program scholarship and a HDR tuition fee sponsorship to
facilitate my writing. This was very touching and I am indebted to you.
Dear Steve Hoover, thank you for the emotional support and overwhelming assistance
that you gave us towards the end of the scholarship period and thereafter.
To the cowpea research group – Andy, Steph and Lisa, thank you for making it happen.
Dear Andy, when I made up my mind to transform cowpea with a novel Bt gene, I knew
that I had to employ molecular biology techniques to accomplish this. The truth was that
I had no idea of how to go about this. But with your simple explanation of how to isolate
the genes, make several constructs, conduct experiments and come up with a suitable
construct for cowpea, it became so clear, and I was able to commence my work. Thank
you also for orientating me in the lab and for helping me familiarise myself with what
goes where. I am forever grateful.
Dear Steph, well, what can I say? First, when I was leaving for Canberra (CSIRO) to work
on cowpea, I was a little bit apprehensive, as I was made to understand that cowpea was
a difficult crop to transform, due to its recalcitrant nature. But when we started the
transformation experiments, you took me through a simple and straightforward system
that I could repeatedly carryout on my own, transforming explants en masse in a short
time. Thank you too for sharing your hood with me and for showing me how we reared
“our bugs”. Secondly, thank you for being my big sister and confidant in the lab. You
always offered quick solutions to my many personal questions and problems. Your
encouragement and laughter in the lab kept me going when and before I carried
Matilda. I am forever grateful too.
Dear Lisa, thank you for your support in ensuring that the chemicals and reagents I
required everyday were in stock and within reach. I appreciate.
To my other friends in the lab, thank you for walking through this journey with me. Dear
Phil and Vince, thanks for welcoming me into the crèche and for making sure that I was
never cold in there. Nayana, Steph B and Rash, thanks for being my sisters and sharing
xxii
crazy ideas, laughter that kept us going, and tears of joy both in and out of the lab. I am
grateful to plant industry lab members ‐ Wendy, Mandy, Jenny, Anna, Kim, Xiaodi, Holly,
Terese, Maud, Kareena W, Christoph, Samba, Craig W, Wendelin, John Moore, Dhara,
Smitha, Sumita, Soma, Hannerlie Botha, the list is endless– you all played a role in one
way or another to see that I succeeded in my research studies were a success. To the
lab members at Entomology– Bill James, Tom Walsh, Joel and Tek, thanks for granting
me access to the Bt strains and for providing a wonderful place for “my bugs”. To Benard
Mware and Betty Namukwaya we started this journey together and we have come a
long way. Thanks for your encouragement.
I would like to express my thanks to those that made me feel at home away from home:
Dear Leanne Wohoro and Evans Lagudah, thank you for connecting me to the Kenyan
community. I thank especially Jane Boke, Flo Muthinja, Willie Bico and their families for
continuous support by orientating me around Canberra and ensured that I settled well.
Thanking Abdul Kibet, Emily Sang, Victor Valla, Purity Goj and Benard Mutai, Gladys and
Ken Omari, Kristeen Riungu and Charles Njora, Faith and Shallo, Carmen and Joseph
Kaburu, Jackie and Papy, Norah and Anthony Thompson, Flo and George Kiogora, Milkah
and Caxton Kirimi, Esther and Jeff, Susan Chumo, Joyce Waweru, Andrew and Phibian
Lang’at, Irene and Pete Wiencke, Joshua and Orpha, Mary Onsarigo, Hellen, Mumbi
Kamau, Maggie Sikulu, and many others. To Amanda Jukes and Maree, Carolyne and
John Bourke, Sandi and Brent Chamberlain, Emma and Shane, Joan and Ian Campbell,
Pete and Caren Curtis, thank you for supporting my family while in Canberra.
I am indebted to the CCH family. Dear Brian and Mandy Johnstone, Damian and Renee
Lowes, Jace Sargent and Jacqui Day, Brendan and Danielle Jordan, Swani and Sandra,
Bonnita and the rest of the CCH family, I thank you for your kindness, for your
understanding and for the enormous support you gave to my family – You rock!
Dear Kerubo (K.B.), thank you for your advice and prayers and for the counsel you
offered, which prepared me in advance. Thank you for making me understand that I’ve
got to do what I’ve got to do, by helping me with a formula of how to juggle with the
writing up and a newborn – it worked incredibly well. God bless you!
xxiii
My sincere thanks go to the then KARI director, Dr. E. Mukisira and Mr. Martin Kivui for
granting me study leave. Dear Dr. Mukisira and Martin, when I sought an extension of
my study leave while in Australia, you replied my emails promptly amidst your busy
schedules. You were keen to endorse my request and facilitated my extension within the
shortest time possible. Thank you for this. To Drs. Nang’ayo, Gicheru, Lusike, Gichuki,
Soi, Miano and Taracha, I thank you for your support.
To my Aunty Grace and Uncle Richard, Musi, Ohmms, Kwamboka, Gedi, Nyaboe,
Armeline, Meg, Joyce, Emmanuel, Mark, Kemunto Arasa, Sammy Omwenga, Efelina
Boyani, Gina Ouattara, Stella Wafukho, Evans Nyaboga, Maureen Miruka and Jemimah
Njuki, I thank you for your support and the logistics that you played in seeing that I
settled back home well and accomplish my writing – I owe you so much.
Finally, I thank everyone else who supported me in different ways towards the
completion of my studies. May the Lord bless you all.
xxiv
Dedication
I dedicate this thesis to Abigail Matilda Bett
1
CHAPTER ONE
Introduction and Literature review
1.1 Cowpea
Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] is an annual herbaceous savannah species known to
originate from Africa (Ehlers and Hall, 1997; Padulosi and Ng, 1997), where it was
domesticated from its wild ancestor V. unguiculata subsp. unguiculata var spontanea
(Pasquet, 1999). It is commonly referred to as the blackeye pea or the pinkeye pea in the
United States (Fery, 2002). Cowpea is a food legume grown in many tropical areas of Africa
and Asia with an annual production of 5 million tonnes from Africa alone, which is the main
producer (FAOSTAT, 2012; Timko and Singh, 2008; Andrea et al., 2007). Nigeria and Niger
are the largest cowpea‐producing countries in Africa with tonnages of 2.5 million and about
1 million tonnes, respectively (FAOSTAT, 2012). In Africa, cowpea is grown by resource‐poor
farmers and is regarded as a woman’s crop (Murdock et al., 2013; Nkongolo et al., 2009).
The crop is drought‐tolerant and plays an important role in the diets of many people in
Africa and in other parts of the developing world (Labuschagne et al., 2008; Murdock et al.,
2008). The grain (Fig 1.1) has a protein content of 25 % and is consumed boiled in the form
of curry, roasted, deep‐fried as a snack (“akara” balls) or ground into flour for bread and
soup‐making (Singh and Singh, 1992; Andrea et al., 2007). The young leaves and green pods
are used as a vegetable alongside a staple dish and are an excellent source of essential
minerals and vitamins (Singh et al., 2003; Nielsen et al., 1997). Following the harvest, the
cowpea residues (haulms) are cut and dried for use as animal feed. In the Western part of
Africa, improved cowpea varieties are also cultivated for animal feed (Nielsen et al., 1997;
Singh et al., 2003). Figure 1.2 shows young cowpea plants growing in the field.
1.2 Cowpea taxonomy and morphology
Cowpea is a dicotyledonous plant belonging to the family Leguminosae and genus Vigna.
The genus Vigna comprises seven sub‐genera namely Haydonia, Lasiospron, Macrorhyncha
(also known as Wajira), Plectotropis, Sigmoidotropis, Ceratotropis and Vigna. The subgenus
Vigna has the most species (38) among them unguiculata (Tomooka et al., 2011; Pasquet,
2
Fig. 1.1: Cowpea dry seed used as a grain (Photo credit: Carl Davies)
3
2000). Further, there are 11 different subspecies which include baoulensis, burundiensis,
letouzeyi, aduensis, pawekiae, alba, pubescens, tenuis, stenophylla, dekindtiana and
unguiculata. The subspecies unguiculata is annual, comprising four cultivar groups namely,
sesquipedalis, biflora, textilis, and unguiculata (Pasquet, 2000). Among the subspecies,
variations have been observed on the growth habit, and the vegetative and reproductive
organs, making it easy to classify them. Wild (var. spontanea) and cultivated cowpea (var.
unguiculata) belong to the cultivar group unguiculata (Padulosi and Ng, 1997; Pasquet,
2000; Tomooka et al., 2011).
1.3 Cowpea cultivation
Cowpea grows well in well‐drained sandy loam soils, thriving at temperatures between 28
and 30 0C and rainfall between 500 and 1200 mm per year (Fig 1.2). Spraying the field with a
herbicide such as glyphosate is recommended while preparing land, which is ploughed,
harrowed and ridges made prior to sowing the seeds. Application of fertilizer, in particular
phosphorous, is usually recommended. Harvesting is done when pods are fully mature and
dry, and these must be stored appropriately to avoid infestation by storage pests (Dugje et
al., 2009).
1.4 Cowpea production constraints
Although cowpea is considered to be an important food legume, its production is
constrained by abiotic and biotic factors. Biotic factors include diseases and pests, which
cause considerable economic loss.
1.4.1 Diseases
Cowpea diseases are caused by viruses, bacteria and fungi. Viral diseases can cause serious
yield losses in cowpea (Hampton et al., 1997). The crop is susceptible to 12 major diseases
including cowpea stunt disease, caused by a dual interaction of cucumber mosaic virus
(CMV) and blackeye cowpea mosaic virus (BICMV). Cowpea plants affected by this disease
are characterized by leaf distortions, mottles and blisters and it is responsible for significant
yield losses. It is also a problem in seed production and germplasm distribution (Gillaspie,
2001). Cowpea yellow mosaic virus (CYMV) infection is characterised by light‐green mottle
4
Fig. 1.2: Cowpea field showing fresh leaf and pods (Photo credit: Jeff Ehlers)
5
and leaf distortion while BICMV‐infected plants exhibit stunting and vein necrosis. Both
diseases are prevalent in Africa and can be responsible for reducing yields by up to 100 % in
some years (Thottappilly and Rossel, 1992).
Other diseases include bacterial pustule and cowpea bacterial blight caused by
Xanthomonas campestris pv. vignicola (Burkholder). These diseases can also cause yield
losses of considerable economic importance. Bacterial blight is reported to reduce yields by
up to 71 % of the cowpea crop (Okechukwu and Ekpo, 2004). Symptoms shown by plants
infected with bacterial blight are necrosis and cracked stems (Williams, 1975). Leaf curl
disease, caused by Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus, is characterized by severe leaf
distortion, yellow mosaic and vein swellings (Rouhibakhsh and Malathi, 2005). The major
fungal diseases of cowpea include Anthracnose, Ascochyta blight, Black leaf spot (leaf smut),
Cercospora leaf spot, and powdery mildew, among others (Emechebe and Florini, 1997).
These diseases can sometimes be responsible for yield reductions between 30 and 50 % of
grain yield (Williams, 1975). For instance, Anthracnose affects the seed resulting in rotting
and seedling mortality causing yield losses of up to 40 % while Ascochyta blight causes
defoliation and lesions on the stems and pod (Emechebe and Florini, 1997).
1.4.2 Weeds
Cowpea is a susceptible host to two important parasitic weeds namely Alectra vogelii
[Benth.] and Striga gesnerioides [Wild.] Vatke (Visser et al., 1977; Visser et al., 1990; Parker
and Polniaszek, 1990; Lane et al., 1991; Emechebe and Lagoke, 2002; Boukar and Fatokun,
2007). Uncontrolled growth of these weeds causes considerable yield losses of economic
importance (Boukar and Fatokun, 2007). Upon infestation of Vigna species, Alectra vogelii
develops lateral roots that penetrate into the root of the host causing disarrangement and
loosening of host tissue cells (Visser et al., 1977) while for Striga, the surface of the host
roots split causing the roots of the parasite to penetrate into the endodermis (Lane et al.,
1991). In other cases, weeds act as sources of virus inoculum. These invasive plants harbor
viruses (Begomoviruses) that are transmitted to and infect cowpea causing significant
losses. Such weeds include Sida rhombifolia, Herissantia crispa, Waltheria indica among
others (Asssunção et al., 2006). Other weeds reported are the annual grasses and those
common in cowpea include Brachiaria deflexa Robyns, Brachiaria lata C.E. Hubbard,
6
Digitaria horizontalis Wild, goose grass, ricegrass and, Paspalum. These are capable of
causing yield reductions of up to 80 % if uncontrolled (Akobundu, 1982). Other weed species
have been found in Asian cowpea fields. These include Trianthema monogyna and Cyperus
rotundus which have been shown to negatively affect cowpea yields (Chattha, et al., 2007).
In Nigeria, yield losses estimated between 50 % and 80 % were reported due to the
presence of weed species belonging to the Asteraceae, Euphorbiaceae and Poaceae (Takim
and Uddin, 2010).
1.4.3 Insect pests
Insect pests are generally considered to be the most important threat to cowpea production
and can lead to significant yield losses if no control measures are used (Jackai, 1995; Ngakou
et al., 2008). They attack every developmental stage of the crop (Murdock et al., 2008).
Cowpea is a host for a number of insect pests that are classified into storage, pre‐ and post‐
flowering pests. These include weevils, pod borers, flower bud thrips, leaf beetles, pod
suckers, aphids, and leafhoppers (Singh and van Emden, 1979; Singh and Allen, 1979; Jackai
and Daoust, 1986).
1.4.3.1 Storage pests
The cowpea weevil (Callosobruchus maculatus) and C. chinensis are pests known to infest
cowpea during storage (Singh and Allen, 1979; Jackai and Daoust, 1986). C. maculatus is
responsible for grain losses of between 30 and 100 % (Singh and Allen, 1979; Jackai and
Daoust, 1986). The weevil can attack the seed while in the field. The adults lay their eggs on
the seed surface and the resulting larvae penetrate into the seed. The adult subsequently
emerges onto the surface of the seed through the holes bored by the larvae (Singh and
Allen, 1979). These pests can be controlled by fumigating the grain with insecticide,
application of ash or sand, use of natural plant products such as chillies, peppermint, garlic
(Tiroesele et al., 2015) and various botanical extracts and essential oils (Balachandra, et al.,
2012).
1.4.3.2 Pre‐flowering pests
The cowpea pre‐flowering pests include aphids, leafhoppers and the foliage beetle (Singh
and Allen, 1979). The cowpea aphid (Aphis craccivora) is a major pest in cowpea growing
7
areas. The aphid mostly feeds on the under‐surface of young leaves, stem tissue and pods of
mature plants causing stunting, leaf distortion, premature defoliation and death of seedlings
(Singh and Allen, 1979). This pest also plays a role in transmitting cowpea aphid‐borne
mosaic virus (Singh and Allen, 1979). Controlling the aphid is achieved though cultural
practices, physical, biological and chemical methods (Ofuya, 1997). A few cowpea varieties
are known to be resistant to the cowpea aphid (Huynh et al., 2015). The leafhoppers attack
cowpea during the seedling stage. The leaves infested by leafhoppers are characterized by
discoloration and cupping and there is subsequent stunted growth (Singh and Allen, 1979).
Yield losses of up to 40 % have been reported as a result of leafhopper damage (Raman et
al., 1978). The beetle (Ootheca mutabilis) feeds on foliage of cowpea seedlings causing
defoliation of leaves. This pest is also a vector of cowpea mosaic virus (Singh and Allen,
1979).
1.4.3.3 Post‐flowering pests
The post‐flowering pests include thrips, flower beetles, the pod sucking bugs and pod borers
(Singh and Allen, 1979). Thrips (Megalurothrips sjostedti) can cause yield losses of up to 70
% if uncontrolled. The damage caused by thrips is characterized by necrosis and abscission
of flowers and flower buds (Ngakou et al., 2008). Besides the use of conventional
insecticides, thrips can be managed using host plant resistance approaches (Olabi et al.,
2003; Olabi et al., 2004).
1.5 The legume pod borer
Among the post‐flowering pests, the Maruca pod borer (MPB), Maruca vitrata, a
lepidopteran, causes significant grain losses of up to 80 % if no control measures are
employed (Jackai, 1995; Singh and van Emden, 1979). It is found within the tropic and sub‐
tropic regions including Northern Australia, East Asia and sub‐Saharan Africa (Margam et al.,
2011). Cowpea infestation occurs at about 21 days after sowing. The adult moths lay single
eggs (6 to about 180 eggs) mostly on flower and leaf buds and flowers. The eggs are a
translucent and shiny light yellow colour and hatch after 5 days. Larval development takes 8
to 14 days. During this time, the larvae undergo various instar stages (first to fifth). The larva
has a dark head and is spotted from the thorax onwards, thereby referred to as the spotted
caterpillar (Sharma et al., 1999). The larva is the destructive stage of this pest, feeding on
8
flowers, flower buds, peduncles, tender parts and green pods of cowpea as well as several
other leguminous crops (Singh and van Emden, 1979; Ba et al., 2009; Fig. 1.3). In cowpea,
the larvae roll and web the leaves and feed on them. They also web the flowers, buds and
pods in order to protect themselves from natural enemies and other adverse effects during
the daytime, and emerge at night on the plant surface (Singh and van Emden, 1979). Upon
maturity, the larvae migrate underneath the leaves and develop to pre‐pupae, which last for
2 days. Thereafter, pupation sets in lasting between 6 and 11 days after which the adults
emerge and live for 7 days. Hence the lifecycle of Maruca takes 27 days on average, with
optimum temperatures between 22 0C and 28 0C (Sharma, 1998).
1.6 Justification for transgenic approaches
Several approaches have been used to address the production constraints in cowpea.
Breeding for host plant resistance is currently the main way of controlling the problem of
pests and diseases. There have been remarkable efforts in cowpea collaborative breeding
programs between Africa and USA towards breeding cowpea varieties for biotic and abiotic
stress. Breeding for resistance has been successful for bacterial and viral diseases, parasitic
weeds and insect pests including thrips, aphids and beetles (Hall et al., 1997; Ehlers and Hall,
1997; Hall et al., 2003). Sources of resistance to bacterial diseases were discovered in the
cowpea genome and cowpea cultivars resistant to bacterial blight and bacterial pustule
were developed at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) (Hall et al., 1997).
Additionally, genes for resistance to virus diseases were identified and cowpea cultivars
resistant to cowpea mosaic virus, cowpea aphid‐borne mosaic virus, cucumber mosaic virus
among others were also developed at IITA (Hall et al., 1997). Genes for resistance to Striga
have been identified in the germplasm collection and used to develop a Striga‐resistant
cultivar, IT90K‐76 released in Nigeria (Hall et al., 1997). There has been also success in
breeding cowpea lines resistant to nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita), (Kirkpatrick and
Morelock, 1987; Singh et al., 2002).
9
Fig. 1.3: Cowpea infestation by Maruca pod borer. (A) Larvae attacking cowpea flower and (B) damaged cowpea pod (Photo Credit: Venu Margam)
10
In West Africa, two cowpea cultivars, ‘Mouride’ and ‘Melakh’ resistant to bacterial blight
and cowpea aphid‐borne mosaic virus were also developed. ‘Mouride’ has good resistance
to several biotypes of the parasitic weed Striga, while ‘Melakh’ is also resistant to the
cowpea aphid and partially resistant to thrips (Ehlers and Hall, 1997; Hall et al., 2003). These
cultivars were released and distributed to farmers in the Sahelian region of Africa including
Ghana (Hall et al., 2003). There has been a very significant effort to breed cowpeas resistant
to insect pests. Genes for resistance to aphids and thrips have been incorporated into new
cultivars. Examples include ISRA‐2065, a breeding line with partial resistance to flower thrips
(Hall et al., 2003) and ‘Bettergro Black‐eye’ developed in the USA with a high level of
resistance to the cowpea curculio beetle (Ehlers and Hall, 1997). Other lines developed at
IITA that are resistant to certain aphids such as TVu 86, TVu 801 and TVu 3000 have been
used in national cowpea breeding programmes for the development of aphid‐resistant
cultivars (Hall et al., 2003). Although significant progress has been made in breeding
cowpeas with resistance to several insect pests, the identification of germplasm with
resistance to pod borer and pod sucking bugs remains a challenge (Fatokun, 2002). Genes
conferring resistance to the MPB are present in the genome of a wild Vigna species, Vigna
vexillata. Although this seems encouraging, V. unguiculata and V. vexillata are sexually
incompatible and hence crossing is not feasible (Fatokun, 2002). Breeding for host plant
resistance to MPB has therefore not been successful.
Control of insect pests in cowpea through the use of insecticidal sprays has been
spectacularly successful (Ajeigbe and Singh, 2006; Kawuki et al., 2005). While technically
feasible, this approach is not viable due to the low incomes of small‐holder farmers and
limited knowledge of the use of insecticides. Besides, the use of chemicals on cowpea leaves
is not adopted as the leaves are utilized as a vegetable (Okeyo‐Owuor et al., 1983;
http://www.aatf‐africa.org/userfiles/CowpeaFAQ.pdf; Isman, 2010). Furthermore,
excessive use of insecticides can be detrimental to human health and the environment, if
the correct dosage is not used (Pimentel et al., 1992; Garry, 2004). As such, alternative
control strategies are needed, for example biological control using the entomopathogenic
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt). MPB can be partially controlled through the use of well‐timed
insecticidal sprays derived from microbial formulations (Taylor, 1968). Alternatively,
11
cowpeas expressing insecticidal proteins derived from Bt genes through genetic
manipulation are in an advanced stage of development (Mohammed et al., 2014).
1.7 The use of Bacillus thuringiensis as an insect control strategy
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) produces spores which contain insecticidal proteins, known as δ‐
endotoxins or crystal (Cry) proteins (Schnepf et al., 1998; de Maagd et al., 2003). The
ingestion of the Cry proteins by target insects causes the crystalline inclusion to solubilise in
the alkaline condition of the insect midgut, thereby yielding the active protein. The
activated protein binds to specific receptors on the epithelial cells in the midgut, causing
pore formation and disruption of the osmotic balance. The cells lyse and the larva starves
and dies (Whalon and Wingerd, 2003; Fig. 1.4).
Bt has been used in agriculture to control pests thereby reducing the need for chemical
sprays and sometimes improving crop yields. Bt is an aerobic, gram positive, spore‐forming
entomopathogenic bacterium belonging to the Bacillus cereus group. This bacterium was
discovered over a century ago and since then it has been used in agriculture to control
insect pests (Bravo et al., 2005). Bt contains toxins that have been used as biocontrol agents
in the form of biopesticides (Taylor, 1968). These commercial bio‐pesticidal formulations
such as Thuricide® Dipel™ and Delfin™ are trade names of products based on Bt var. kurstaki
and are specific to lepidopteran pests including Maruca (Taylor 1968; Rodgers, 1993;
Whalon and Wingerd, 2003; Sanchis and Bourguet, 2008; Kaur, 2000; Yule and Srinivasan,
2013). Other biopesticides based on recombinant Bt strains and specific to lepidopteran
insects include Maatch™ and M‐Peril™ both derived from Bt kurstaki strains that contain
Cry1A/Cry1C and Cry1Ac, respectively, (Rodgers, 1993; Kaur, 2000). Potential benefits of
these biopesticides include their low risk to the environment and health. They are applied in
small doses and they readily decompose resulting in minimal environmental pollution
(Thakore, 2006).
12
Fig. 1.4: Mode of action of Bt crystal toxins (Watkins et al., 2011)
13
1.7.1 Bt insecticidal proteins
1.7.1.1 Crystal (Cry) proteins
Different Cry proteins have proven to be toxic to different insects and can be highly specific
(van Frankenhuyzen, 2009). Based on their specificity to different insect orders, the Cry
proteins have been divided into four major classes (Cry1 to Cry4) which are Lepidoptera‐
specific, Lepidoptera‐ and Diptera‐specific, Coleoptera‐specific and Diptera‐specific,
respectively. These Cry protein classes are encoded by cry1, cry2, cry3 and cry4 genes,
respectively (Hofte and Whiteley, 1989; Crickmore et al., 1998; van Frankenhuyzen, 2009).
Within the classes, the Cry proteins are ranked based on their amino acid identity, and
further assigned unique names comprising an uppercase and a lowercase letter (eg. Cry1Ac)
based on their sequence identities (Crickmore et al., 1998; Crickmore et al., 2012).
1.7.1.2 Vegetative insecticidal proteins (Vips)
The Vips are an additional family of proteins which are synthesized by Bt, in this case during
the vegetative growth phase (Estruch et al., 1996). The Vips bear no amino acid sequence
similarity to Cry proteins (Estruch et al., 1996) and have different mechanisms of action (Lee
et al., 2003). Upon ingestion by insects, Vips are solubilised by gut proteases that activate
the protein. The activated Vip then interacts with specific receptors found in the midgut
epithelial tissue. This leads to formation of pores and the rupture of the epithelial cells,
resulting in cell death (Singh et al., 2010). Symptoms develop within a period of 48 to 72
hours following the ingestion of Vip3 toxins (Yu et al., 1997). Vips exhibit insecticidal activity
towards a range of lepidopteran (Estruch et al., 1996) and coleopteran insects (Warren,
1997) and are classified into three different groups, Vip1, Vip2 and Vip3. This classification
was proposed by the Bacillus thuringiensis toxin nomenclature committee (Crickmore et al.,
2012). Figure 1.5 is a dendrogram based on amino acid sequence, illustrating the
relatedness of the Vip toxins believed to share a common three‐domain structure
(Crickmore et al., 2012). Although the sequence of Vip4 protein has been released to
GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/328833560), there is no publicly available
information on the host range of Vip4.
14
Fig. 1.5: Classification of vegetative insecticidal proteins believed to share a common three domain structure. Source: http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/
15
The Vip1 and Vip2 proteins are active against certain Coleoptera (Warren, 1997) and
Homoptera (Yu et al., 2011b). Vip1 and Vip2 form a binary toxin of the A‐B type where Vip2
is the cytotoxic A‐domain for enzymatic reaction and Vip1 contains the receptor‐binding B‐
domain (de Maagd, et al., 2003). The mechanism of action of the binary toxins involves the
binding of Vip1 protein to specific receptors in the midgut cells of the susceptible insect.
This forms a channel that provides a pathway for Vip2 to pass through the pore and into the
cytoplasm of the target cells. Based on its homology to ADP‐ribosyltransferases, Vip2
modifies actin inhibiting its polymerization, thereby disrupting the integrity of the
cytoskeleton (Leuber et al., 2006; Aktories et al., 2011) which leads to death.
The Vip3 toxins are active against some Lepidoptera (Estruch et al., 1996) and have become
an important class of insecticidal proteins because of their insecticidal spectrum within the
Lepidopteran pests (Lee et al. 2003; Liu et al., 2007). There are more than 70 different vip3
gene sequences in the Crickmore database
(http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/vip.html).
The Vip3 proteins are classified into 3 families, namely 3A, 3B and 3C, and further grouped
into eight 3A sub‐families (Vip3Aa to Ah), two 3B sub‐families (Vip3Ba and Bb) and one 3C
sub‐family (Vip3Ca) based on their DNA sequence similarities (Crickmore et al., 2012). Gene
products of the vip3A family such as vip3Aa19 have been shown to be toxic to the beet
armyworm (Spodoptera exigua), cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) and the
diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) (Liu et al., 2007) while vip3Bb2 is active against the
Australian bollworm (Helicoverpa punctigera) (Beard et al., 2008).
1.7.2 Bt transgenic crops
Bt genes have been used to develop transgenic crops expressing insecticidal proteins
(Shelton et al., 2002). Nearly 30 million hectares of Bt crops were grown globally in 2014 and
the area continues to grow (James, 2014). Bt genes have been transferred to and expressed
in major crops including corn, cotton, soybean, canola among others to provide host plant
resistance against major insect pests. Several of these Bt crops have been commercialized in
both developing and developed countries (James, 2014; Qaim and Kouser, 2013).
16
Bt cotton expressing Cry1Ac insecticidal protein against Helicoverpa (Lepidoptera) was
among the first transgenic crops to be developed and commercialized. It was available in the
market as BollGard® (USA) or INGARD® (Australia) and provided control of the pest,
resulting in reduced insecticide use (Fitt, 2003;
https://www.icac.org/cotton_info/tis/biotech/documents/recorderdocs/december_03.pdf
Fitt, 2008) and sometimes an increase in yield depending on the farming practice. The Bt
cotton was also commercialized and adopted by farmers in developing countries such as
South Africa, which realized yields nearly double those of conventional cotton (Toenniessen,
et al., 2003; Qaim and Kouser, 2013). Other transgenic Bt crops developed with insect
resistance traits are vegetables including Bt broccoli and Bt eggplant/aubergine, both
expressing Cry1Ac protein targeting lepidopteran pests particularly Plutella xylostella. The Bt
eggplant was developed in India, where it is known as Bt brinjal and was first
commercialized in Bangladesh in 2014. It is likely to be commercialized in India in the near
future (James, 2014).
1.7.3 Insect Resistance Management
Despite the dramatic achievements of these Bt crops, there is a concern that natural insect
resistance to Bt crops will develop over time (Gould, 1998; Sumerford et al., 2013). In a
laboratory‐based study (Akhurst et al., 2003), the BX strain of the cotton bollworm,
Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner), fed on an artificial diet containing various Cry toxins
including Cry1Ac, Cry1Ab, and Cry2Ab for several generations, developed resistance which
allowed the lepidopteran pest to survive on transgenic cotton expressing Cry1Ac protein.
Another lab‐based experiment showed that two strains (Loxahatchee and Cry1C‐Sel) of the
diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella), developed resistance to Cry1Ac and Cry1C,
respectively. They were able to survive and complete larval development on two transgenic
Bt broccoli expressing Cry1Ac and Cry1C, respectively (Tabashnik et al., 2003). Resistance to
a commercial Bt‐transgenic cotton cultivar expressing Cry1Ac was also demonstrated for
two laboratory‐derived strains of the pink bollworm, Pectinophora gossypiella (Tabashnik et
al., 2002).
Incidences of field‐evolved insect resistance to Bt crops carrying a single cry gene have been
reported. In the United States, Tabashnik et al. (2008) monitored fields of Bt transgenic
17
cotton producing Cry1Ac toxin. Data collected over a 2‐year period showed field‐evolved
resistance in one (Helicoverpa zea) out of five Lepidopteran pests. Alvi et al. (2012)
investigated the resistance of H. armigera to Cry1Ac Bt‐cotton in Pakistan. They showed
that field‐collected populations of H. armigera survived on Bt cotton and resistance to
Cry1Ac increased significantly after six generations of selection in the lab. In India, Dhurua
and Gujar (2011) sampled a population of pink bollworm from non‐Bt cotton fields and used
it to demonstrate field‐evolved resistance to Bt cotton expressing a single Bt toxin (Cry1Ac).
There was a high incidence and survival of the pest where Bt cotton had been cultivated for
several years. Ferre et al. (1991) obtained a field population of diamondback moth larvae
and exposed them to five different Bt crystal proteins. The surviving larvae were resistant to
the Cry1Ab toxin and appeared to have lost the ability to bind the toxin (Ferre et al., 1991).
The above cases present evidence that insect resistance to Bt crops can develop in the field.
One way of addressing the development of resistance to Bt toxins is to use more than one
Bt gene (gene pyramiding) to develop a crop variety expressing two or more insecticidal
proteins with different mechanisms of action (Roush, 1998; Bates et al., 2005). Laboratory
bioassays were carried out by Stewart et al. (2001) to compare the toxicity of single‐ and
dual‐toxin Bt cotton cultivars expressing Cry1Ac alone and Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab, respectively.
Fresh tissues were fed to larvae of three lepidopteran pests namely tobacco budworm, fall
and beet armyworm. The larvae of the three pests were more susceptible to leaves and
flowers of the dual toxin Bt cotton than the single‐Bt cotton or non‐Bt cotton cultivars. Cao
et al. (2002) pyramided cry1Ac and cry1C genes in broccoli by sexually crossing plants
containing the two cry genes. They obtained a cry1Ac + cry1C hybrid expressing both cry
proteins. When the leaves of this hybrid were fed to two different populations of
diamondback moths (one was Cry1A‐resistant and the other was Cry1C‐resistant) there was
high mortality to both diamondback moth populations. In other reports, a population of H.
armigera (strain SP15) was shown to be resistant to Cry2Ab toxin in laboratory assays
(Mahon et al., 2007). When the SP15 strain was tested using leaves of a pyramided
transgenic Bt cotton expressing both Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab it proved to be susceptible to
Cry1Ac, the additional toxin found in this dual‐Bt cotton cultivar (Mahon et al., 2007). This
demonstrates the efficacy of stacking two different cry genes in one transgenic crop.
18
In addition to the use of twin cry proteins, a Vip protein has been utilized to complement
one or more cry proteins for insect resistance management. Several Bt pyramided corn lines
developed using a combination of cry genes and a vip gene were tested for their efficacy in
the control of the fall armyworm (S. frugiperda), an important pest of corn. These Bt
pyramids included the Genuity®VT Double Pro™ producing Cry1A.105 and Cry2Ab2 and
commercialized in USA. A field population of S. frugiperda was confirmed to be resistant to
Cry1F protein (Huang et al., 2014; Niu et al., 2014) and Cry1Ab (Yang et al., 2013). In
greenhouse trials the resistant populations caused as much damage to the leaves of two
single‐Bt corn hybrids with Cry1F and Cry1Ab, respectively, as occurred on non‐Bt corn
leaves. However, the insect populations did not survive on the pyramided Bt corn (Niu et al.,
2014). VipCot™ is a cotton cultivar developed by stacking Vip3A with Cry1Ab to control
major lepidopteran cotton pests. Adamczyk and Mahaffey (2008) demonstrated the efficacy
of Vip3A, Cry1Ab or a combination of these two proteins on four lepidopteran pests (fall and
beet armyworms, bollworms and tobacco budworms). In 2004, cotton containing Vip3A had
less tobacco budworms after 5 days in leaf and floral bioassays when compared to non‐GM
cotton. The larval weights of the four pests were significantly less than the larvae on non‐
GM cotton. In 2005, cotton lines stacked with Cry1Ab + Vip3A traits caused a significantly
higher mortality in fall and beet armyworms and the bollworms, than cotton with just the
Vip3A trait. A similar scenario was observed by Bommireddy and Leonard (2008) when
testing the survival of two lepidopteran cotton pests (H. zea and H. virescens) on a cotton
line having both Cry and Vip traits (VipCot). Survival levels as low as 1 % were observed on
H. zea after 96 hours of exposure to terminal leaves and reproductive parts, when
compared to conventional cotton. In H. virescens, survival was 4 % and 2 % following 96
hours exposure on terminal leaves and reproductive parts, respectively. Kurtz et al. (2007)
and Palekar et al. (2011) confirmed this high mortality when bioassays were carried out
using neonate and fourth instar larvae of H. zea or H. virescens on lyophilized tissues or in
VipCot fields artificially infested with the pests. In both cases, larval mortality in H. zea or H.
virescens ranged between 97 and 100 %. Stacking genes with different modes of action can
therefore offer a possible solution to control resistant pests and reduce the chances of
developing insects resistant to Bt proteins. Furthermore, transgenic rice expressing a fusion
protein (Cry1Ab/Vip3Ah) caused 100 % mortality (in all developmental stages of the rice
plants) to the Asiatic rice borer (C. suppressalis) in a 7‐day bioassay (Chen et al., 2010).
19
Several studies have shown that Maruca is susceptible to Bt insecticidal proteins (cry toxins)
either incorporated in artificial diets (Srinivasan, 2008) or in a Bt cowpea containing a
cry1Ab gene in the field (Higgins et al., 2012; Mohammed et al., 2014). As discussed above
for other pests, there is a chance that MPB will develop resistance to the single‐gene Bt
cowpea. To avoid this or at least greatly delay the development of resistance, the addition
of a second Bt (vip) gene to complement the cry1Ab gene seems prudent. However, it was
unknown whether Vips were toxic to MPB.
1.8 Research Hypothesis
The Vips of Bt are a class of insecticidal proteins currently being utilized commercially to
complement the Cry1 and 2 δ‐endotoxins in corn and cotton (Whitehouse et al., 2007;
Castagnola and Jurat‐Fuentes, 2012). Vip proteins bind to different target sites than Cry
proteins in several tested Lepidopteran species. Since combining two or more insecticidal
genes into one crop variety reduces the risk of insect resistance in Bt crops, it is envisaged
that Vip proteins could be used together with Cry proteins for Insect Resistance
Management (IRM) in cowpea. The hypothesis therefore states that the vip gene encodes a
toxin with insecticidal activity against the Maruca pod borer. Thus, in the longterm, insect
resistance in cowpea will be better managed by using a combination of a cry1 and a vip
gene.
1.9 Research Objectives
This study sought to identify suitable vip gene(s) in Bt that will provide resistance to MPB
and thus complement the Cry1Ab‐transgenic cowpea already developed. The main aim of
the research therefore was to develop a Bt cowpea carrying a vip gene. This was achieved
through the following objectives:
1. Screen Bt strains for genes encoding Vip toxins expected to be active against
Lepidoptera
2. Overexpress selected Vip toxins in Escherichia coli
3. Conduct insect bioassays using MPB larvae on single Vip toxins
4. Re‐construct a vip gene for cowpea transformation
5. Transform cowpea with the re‐constructed vip gene.
20
6. Regenerate and characterize transgenic plants
7. Conduct insect feeding studies on transgenic cowpea using Maruca larvae to
determine resistance
2.0 Expected output
From this work, it was expected that a vip‐transgenic cowpea line resistant to the MPB
would be developed. In due course, this trait could be introgressed by cowpea breeders into
existing Bt cowpea lines carrying a cry1Ab gene. This approach would avoid, or at least
greatly delay, the resistance of Maruca to Bt toxins thus providing an enhanced strategy to
manage insect resistance in this important food legume.
21
CHAPTER TWO
General Materials and Methods
2.1 Preparation of bacterial cultures
2.1.1 Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cultures
To establish Bt cultures, Luria agar (LA) medium consisting of tryptone (10 g/L), NaCl (5 g/L),
yeast extract (5 g/L) and bacteriological agar (15 g/L) was poured into sterile Petri dishes
and allowed to cool. Luria Broth (LB) was prepared using the above ingredients but without
agar. The medium was inoculated with bacteria using the dilution streak method and
incubated overnight at 28 0C. For each strain, a single bacterial colony was picked and used
to inoculate 5 mL of LB in sterile test tubes. The bacterial cultures were incubated overnight
at 28 0C on a shaker at 230 revolutions per min (rpm). To archive the Bt strains, a 500 μL
aliquot of the bacterial culture was added to a 1.5 mL tube containing 500 μL of sterile 30%
glycerol. The tubes were shaken gently and allowed to stand for 1 h at room temperature.
They were stored in a ‐800C freezer.
2.1.2 Preparation of Mannitol Glutamate Luria (MGL) culture medium for Agrobacterium
tumefaciens
To make 1 L of MGL medium, the ingredients in Table 2.1 were mixed thoroughly in about
800 mL of sterile RO water. The pH was adjusted to 7 using 1N NaOH and the volume
adjusted to 1 L. The solution was dispensed into 100 mL bottles and autoclaved. For MGL
plates, 15 g of Bacto Agar was added to 1 L of medium prior to autoclaving.
Table 2.1: Ingredients for bacterial MGL medium
Chemicals Quantities to make 1L medium
Mannitol 5.0 g L‐glutamic acid 1.0 g KH2PO4 0.25 g NaCl 0.1 g MgSO4.7H2O 0.1 g Tryptone 5.0 g Yeast extract 2.5 g Biotin (from 0.1 mg/mL stock) 10 µL
22
2.2 Isolation of bacterial DNA
2.2.1 Isolation of genomic DNA from Bacillus thuringiensis
The Bacterial Genomic DNA isolation kit from Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, MO 63103, USA) was
used to extract DNA from bacterial cultures. The following modifications were made to the
manufacturer’s instructions: A final volume of 200 µL lysozyme solution was prepared
foreach DNA isolation and used to suspend the bacterial cells. A volume of 20 µL of
Proteinase K solution was added to the sample followed by 200 µL of Lysis Solution C. A 500
µL volume of column preparation solution was added to each GenElute Miniprep Binding
Column. The lysate was centrifuged for 12000 g for 5 min. For the first wash, 500 µL of wash
solution was added and centrifuged for 1 min at 12000 g. For the second wash, 500 µL of
wash solution concentrate was added. For DNA elution, 200 µL of elution solution was
added and the column was centrifuged for 1 min at 6500 g. The eluted DNA was stored at 4
0C for further analysis such as PCR.
2.2.2 Isolation of plasmid DNA from Escherichia coli and Agrobacterium tumefaciens
A single colony of E. coli was grown in 10 mL of LB medium with selection overnight at 37 0C.
Unless otherwise stated, plasmid DNA was isolated from the bacterial culture following the
protocol described in the Bioline (Alexandria, NSW 1435 Australia) Plasmid Mini Kit. The
preparation of reagents and isolation procedures followed the manufacturer’s instructions.
Plasmid DNA was isolated from Agrobacterium cultures using the Bioline kit described
above.
2.3 Purification of PCR products
Unless otherwise stated, the purification of PCR products was carried out following the
QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit protocol (Qiagen 2010).
2.4 Cloning of vip genes
Cloning of vip genes was carried out following the procedures previously described in the
Expresso™ T7 Cloning and Expression System (Lucigen Corporation, Middleton, WI 53562
USA) and/or the Gibson assembly method (Gibson et al., 2009; Gibson, 2011). In both cases,
23
primers designed to be compatible with the expression vector were used to amplify the
coding regions of the vip genes.
2.4.1 Expresso™ T7 Cloning and Expression System
The PCR products were purified and mixed with the pETite vector for direct transformation
into E. coli strain 10G. Cells were cultured on LB plates containing 30 mg/L kanamycin
overnight at 37 0C at 250 rpm. To confirm the presence of the insert and expression vector,
plasmid DNA was isolated (as described in section 2.2.2) and either used as a template for
PCR or for restriction mapping. Subsequently, plasmid DNA of the positive clones was used
to transform E. coli strain BL21 for protein expression following the instructions supplied in
the Expresso™ T7 Cloning and Expression System. The transformed colonies were selected
on LB plates containing kanamycin and a single colony was grown in LB at 37 0C on a shaker
(250 rpm).
2.4.2 The Gibson assembly method of DNA cloning
Gibson assembly is a method of joining two or more DNA fragments (also known as bricks)
without the use of restriction enzymes. The bricks are joined by their overlapping end
sequences of approximately 40 bp in a PCR reaction with the aid of three enzymes – an
exonuclease, DNA polymerase and DNA ligase. The exonuclease creates a 3’ overhang to
facilitate joining the bricks complementary to each other on one end, DNA polymerase fills
gaps within the joined bricks and DNA ligase seals the nicks of the joined bricks
(https://www.addgene.org/plasmid‐protocols/gibson‐assembly/).
Forward and reverse primers were designed for the DNA bricks (8 kbp or less) to be
assembled. For PCR amplification, 1 µL of forward primer (10 µM stock), 1 µL reverse primer
(10 µM), 10 µL 5x Phusion High Fidelity Buffer, 1 µL dNTPs (10 mM), 0.5 µL template DNA,
0.5 µL Phusion DNA polymerase (2 U/µL) and 36 µL nuclease‐free water were mixed in a
single reaction tube. The PCR cycling conditions were 98 0C for 30 s, 30 cycles of 98 0C for 10
s, 65 0C for 20 s and 72 0C for 1 min and 30 s, a final extension of 72 0C for 5 min and hold at
4 0C. The products were separated by electrophoresis through a 1 % agarose gel and the
selected DNA bands were purified as in section 2.3. To carry out the assembly reaction, a
total of 5 µL of DNA was added to 15 µL aliquot of 1.33x Gibson Master Mix stock [100 µL of
24
5X isothermal buffer, 2 µL T5 exonuclease (1.0 U/µL), 6.25 µL Phusion DNA pol (2U/µL), 50
µL Taq DNA ligase (40 U/µL) and 216.75 µL water to make up to 375 µL final volume]. The 5
X isothermal buffer comprised 25 % polyethylene glycol (PEG)‐8000; 500 mM Tris‐HCL pH
7.5; 50 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 1 mM dATP, 1 mM dTTP, 1 Mm dCTP, 1 mM dGTP, 5 mM
dGTP, 5 mM nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD). For each brick, 10 to 100 ng of DNA
was added and the reaction incubated at 50 0 C for 1 h. E. coli cells were transformed with 1
µL of the assembly reaction without purification and incubated at 37 0 C. Plasmid DNA was
extracted from E. coli following procedures in section 2.2.2 and the construct was confirmed
by restriction mapping.
2.5 Sequencing of vip3 genes cloned in E. coli
Plasmid DNA (150 – 300 ng) extracted from E. coli was used as a template for sequencing.
For one reaction, an aliquot of 1 µL of Big Dye® Terminator (Applied Biosystems Cat #
4337454) containing Taq DNA polymerase, standard dNTPs and labelled ddNTPs, 3.5 µL 5x
sequencing buffer (Applied Biosystems Cat # 4305605) optimized for use with Big Dye®
Terminator, 3.2 pmol of primer (0.3 µL of 10 pmol/ µL stock) and MilliQ water to make a
final volume of 20 µL. Each sequencing reaction was replicated three times. The PCR cycles
were as follows: 96 0C for 1 min, and 25 cycles of 96 0C for 10 s, 50 0C for 5 s and 60 0C for 4
min. To purify the PCR products, each reaction was transferred to a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube.
An aliquot of 5 µL of 125 mM EDTA, 60 µL of 100 % cold ethanol was added to 20 µL of the
PCR reaction and mixed well. The sample was incubated at room temperature for 15 min
then centrifuged at 12000 g for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and 60 µL of 70 %
ethanol was added, centrifuged at 12000 g for 5 min and the supernatant removed. The
pellet was dried in a Speedivac for 5 min.
2.6 Preparation of electrocompetent Agrobacterium (AGL1) cells
Sterile YMB medium (Table 2.2) was prepared and 100 mL of this inoculated (in a 500 mL
flask) with a loop of AGL1 cells and grown at 28 0 C until the OD600 reached between 0.7 and
1.0. The culture was placed in the cold room for 30 min and centrifuged at 4000 g for 15 min
at 4 0C. The supernatant was discarded and pellet resuspended gently with 35 mL of cold
sterile MilliQ water in an ice bucket on an orbital shaker. The cells were centrifuged again at
4000 g for 15 min at 4 0 C using a swing‐out rotor. The supernatant was discarded and pellet
25
gently resuspended in 5 mL of cold sterile 10 % glycerol solution. Aliquots of 40 µL of cells
were dispensed into sterile 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at ‐
80 0C.
Table 2.2: Ingredients for YMB medium
Chemicals Quantity to make 1 L
Yeast extract 400 mg Mannitol 10 gNaCl 100 mg MgSO4.7H2O 200 mg K2HPO4 200 mg Yeast extract 2.5 g
2.7 Transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (AGL1) cells
An aliquot (40 µL) of AGL1 cells (see section 2.6) was thawed on ice and added to a pre‐
chilled 1.5 mL eppendorf tube. An aliquot of 2 µL of DNA was added and stirred gently with
a pipette tip. The mixture was allowed to stand in ice for 2 min and then transferred to a
chilled electroporation cuvette (2 mm gap) and subjected to a pulse of 2.5 kV. The cuvette
was returned to ice and 1 mL of chilled SOC medium added. This mixture was transferred to
a sterile eppendorf tube and incubated on a shaker at 28 0C and 100 rpm for 90 min. An
aliquot of 100 µL was plated on MGL medium with 0.2 mg/L Rifampicin, other appropriate
antibiotics for selection. The cultures were grown at 28 0C for 2 days. Single colonies were
selected and grown in 10 mL of liquid MGL medium with appropriate antibiotics for 2 days.
An aliquot (500 µL) was stored as a glycerol stock and the remainder used to isolate DNA.
The DNA was used to confirm the construct by restriction mapping.
2.8 Transformation of E. coli cells
Transformation of competent E. coli cells with the plasmid containing the genes of interest
was conducted using the High Efficiency Transformation protocol (C2987) described by the
New England Biolabs (UK). Briefly, a tube of E. coli DH5α cells was thawed on ice for 10 min
and 100 ng of plasmid DNA added. The cells were mixed with the DNA by flicking the tube 4‐
5 times and incubated on ice for 30 min. The cells were heat‐shocked at 42 0C for 30 s and
immediately placed on ice for 5 min. An aliquot of 950 µL of SOC medium (room
26
temperature) was added and cells incubated at 37 0 C for 1 h with vigorous rotation at 250
rpm. Cells were mixed thoroughly by inverting the tube and diluted in several 10‐fold serial
dilutions in SOC medium. Aliquots of 50 to 100 µL of each dilution were spread onto warm
(37 0C) LB plates with selection agent and incubated overnight at 37 0C.
2.9 Protein expression and analysis
Protein was extracted from bacterial cultures as described by Studier (2005) as summarized
in Fig. 2.1. E. coli BL21 transformed with vip3 genes or cry2Aa was grown overnight at 37 0C.
Single colonies were grown in 2 mL of LB overnight on a shaker (250 rpm) at 37 0C. An
aliquot (500 µL) was used to inoculate 100 mL of auto‐induction medium (Tables 2.3 and
2.4) containing 30 mg/L kanamycin and incubated overnight at 37 0C with vigorous shaking
at 255 rpm. At an OD of 4 to 10, the cells were centrifuged at 4000 g for 10 min at 4 0 C and
the supernatant discarded. A volume of 20 mL of a Tris‐buffered protein extraction reagent,
BugBuster™ (Novagen®) and 200 µL of lysozyme (10 mg/mL) was added to the pellet and
incubated at room temperature on an orbital shaker (60 rpm) for 2 h. An aliquot of 20 µL of
DNase 1 solution (2000 U/mL) was added to the lysed suspension, incubated at 37 0 C for 15
min and centrifuged at 8000 g for 30 min at 4 0C and the supernatant (soluble fraction)
stored on ice. The pellet was re‐suspended with 10 mL of protein extraction reagent, 200 µL
of lysozyme (10 mg/mL) added and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The
suspension was centrifuged at 6000 g for 15 min at 4 0C insoluble fraction stored on ice. To
wash the pellet, 10 mL of 1 in 10 diluted protein extraction reagent was added to the pellet,
vortexed and centrifuged at 6000 g, 4 0C for 15 min and the supernatant was discarded.
These washing steps were repeated 3 times with the last centrifugation at 8000 g for 15 min
at 4 0 C. The pellet was suspended in 2 mL of distilled water. An aliquot of 25 µL of SDS gel‐
loading buffer was added to 100 µL of the resulting suspension and solubilized by boiling for
5 min. The protein concentrations were determined by Bradford (1976) assay and samples
were prepared for sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE)
analysis by the addition of SDS gel loading buffer (422 mM Tris HCl, 563 mM Tris base, 0.8 %
lauryl dodecyl sulfate, 1.6 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM DTT). The 10 % Bis‐Tris precast NuPage gels
were obtained from Life Technologies (Mulgrave, Victoria 3170 Australia), samples were
loaded (30 µg of protein per lane) and the samples electrophoresed at 100 V for 90 min.
27
Protein from an untransformed E. coli (BL21) was used as a negative control while E. coli
transformed with cry2Aa was used as a positive control (Srinivasan 2008).
Table 2.3: Ingredients for Auto‐induction medium, pH 6.9 (for 500 mL)
Chemicals Final concentration
NZ‐Amine 1 % Na2HPO4 25 mMNH4Cl 50 mM MgSO4 2 mM K2HPO4 25 mM Yeast extract 0.5 % Na2SO4 5 mM Glycerol 0.5 % Glucose 0.05 %α‐lactose monohydrate 0.2 % 1000 X Trace minerals (Table 2.4) 0.2 X
Table 2.4: Constituents of 1000 X Trace minerals (for 500 mL)
Chemicals Final concentration
FeCl3 60% solution 50 mM CaCl2.2H20 20 mMMnCl2 10 mM ZnSO4.7H20 10 mMCoCl2.6H20 2 mM CuCl2.2H20 2 mMNiCl2.6H20 2 mM Na2MoO4.2H20 2 mMNaSeO3 2 mM H3BO4 or H3BO3 2 mM
28
Fig. 2.1: Protein extraction flow chart
29
2.10 Identification of Vip protein using Mass Spectrometry
A mass spectrometry (MS) analysis was carried out to identify the expressed Vip3 proteins.
To prepare the samples, protein SDS‐PAGE gels were transferred onto a glass plate and the
protein bands excised. The bands were forwarded to the Australian Proteome Analysis
Facility (Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109 Australia) for mass spectrometry. Briefly,
the gels were destained with ammonium bicarbonate: acetonitrile, and then reduced (25
mM DTT in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate) at 56 0C for 30 min. They were then alkylated
(55 mM IAA in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate) in the dark for 20 min. Following incubation
the gel bands were washed, dried and digested with trypsin (150 ng) overnight. The
peptides were extracted from the gel using acetonitrile: formic acid, and then concentrated
prior to analysis. They were directed into a mass spectrometer (Triple TOF 5600 AB Sciex)
and then fragmented for a second mass analysis. The resulting data was generated using
Analyst 2.0 MASCOT script searched by Mascot (Matrix science, 2014) and subsequently
subjected to database matching (Cottrell, 2011). The protein identification program used for
the analysis assigns a score for peptides that match the predicted fragments based on the
peptide sequences in the database (Matrix science, 2014).
2.11 Maintenance of a Maruca vitrata insect colony in vitro
2.11.1 Preparation of Maruca artificial diet
The preparation of Maruca artificial diet was based on the method of Jackai & Raulston
(1988). To make 1 L of artificial diet, the ingredients in Table 2.5 [cowpea flour, dried leaf
powder, ascorbic acid, nipagen, sorbic acid, sucrose, wheat germ and Wesson salts (Table
2.6)] were mixed in a blender. Water (500 mL) was heated for 1 min in a microwave on 1000
watts, and added to the blender and mixed. KOH, choline chloride, acetic acid, vitamin
solution (Table 2.7) and aureomycin were then added followed by pulsing for 5 s after each
ingredient. The water (for agar) and agar was combined and heated in microwave for 3 min
on high (1000 watts), stirred and heated for another 1.5 min on high. The agar solution was
added to the blender and mixed well, carefully pulsing twice for 2 s. The mixture was poured
into eight rectangular Chinese food containers (15 x 10 x 3.5cm) to a depth of 1 cm and
allowed to cool and set.
30
Table 2.5: Ingredients for Maruca artificial diet
Ingredients Quantities to make 1L Diet
Hot water (for initial blending) 500 mL Cowpea seed flour 100 gCowpea leaf (freeze dried)* 12.5 g Ascorbic acid 6.25 gNipagen 1.58 g Sorbic acid 0.835 g Sucrose 15 g Wheatgerm 31.8 g Wesson salt mix (Table 2.6) 10.6 gKOH (4M) 5.5 mL Choline chloride (15 %) 7.4 mLAcetic acid (25 %) 12.5 mL Vitamin solution (Table 2.7) 7.5 mL Aureomycin (5 % active ingredient) (Chlortetracycline hydrochloride)
3.5 mL
Agar 14.8 g Water (for adding agar) Enough to make final volume to 1 L
(~450ml)
*The cowpea leaf is 4‐week old cowpea leaves freeze dried and crushed to a fine powder.
Table 2.6: Ingredients to make 100 g Wesson salt mixture
Ingredients Quantities
Calcium carbonate 21 g Copper sulphate (5H2O) 39 mgFerric phosphate/Iron (III) phosphate 1.47 g Manganous sulphate (anhydrous) 20 mgMagnesium sulphate (anhydrous) 9 g Potassium aluminium sulphate 9 mg Potassium chloride 12 gPotassium dihydrogen phosphate 31 g Potassium iodide 5 mgSodium chloride 10.5 g Sodium fluoride 57 mgTri‐calcium phosphate 14.9 g
31
Table 2.7: Ingredients to make 100 mL Vitamin solution
Ingredients Quantities
Calcium pantothenate 1.2 g Niacin 0.6 gRiboflavin 0.3 g Folic acid 0.3 gThiamine HCl 150 mg Pyridoxine HCl 150 mg Biotin 12 mg B12 (Cyanocobalamine) 6 mg
2.11.2 Preparation of Honey solution for Maruca adults
To prepare 1 L of honey solution for the emerging adult insects, all ingredients in Table 2.8
(except for ascorbic acid) were combined in a 1 L Schott bottle. The solution was
microwaved on high for 2 min, mixed well and autoclaved. The solution was allowed to cool
to 60 0C and then the ascorbic acid was added. The honey solution was stored at 4 0 C until
used.
Table 2.8: Ingredients for the preparation of honey solution
Ingredients Quantities
Sugar 40 gHoney* 40 g Sorbic acid 1 gAscorbic acid 2 g Water Up to 1 L
* Capilano 100 % Natural Australian Honey (Richlands, QLD 4077 Australia)
2.11.3 Preparation of honey pots for feeding adults whilst in cages:
Honey pots were prepared by boring a 1 cm hole in the lids of 60 mL urine specimen plastic
containers. An 8 cm length of cotton dental wick was inserted in the hole. Honey solution
(40 mL) (section 2.10.2) was poured into the plastic container and covered with the lid
containing the wick. Honey pots were placed in the cage (step 4, Fig. 2.2) for rearing the
adult Maruca.
32
2.11.4 Procedures for egg collection
The artificial diet (2.10.1) was divided into 32 cubes per container. Nappy liners cut in half
(“balconies”) containing eggs (see 2.10.5) were placed onto the surface of the diet, and
transferred to a larger lunch box (25 x 19 x 6 cm) and covered with a lid. A window (21 x 14
cm) was cut in the lid and a very fine wire mesh was attached for ventilation (Fig. 2.3). After
closing the box with the ventilated lid, it was covered with cling film and 5 to 6 holes were
punctured for ventilation using sharp forceps.
2.11.5 Rearing of Maruca larvae
The procedures for the maintenance of a Maruca colony are shown in Fig. 2.2. To start the
insect colony, a 5 L bucket (“the cage”) was prepared with two honey pots and a Petri dish
filled with wet vermiculite to increase humidity (Fig. 2.4 A). Two “balconies” were placed
over the edge of the cage (Fig. 2.4 A) as a source of egg collection as the adults lay eggs on
these. A Petri dish with the pupae (from Step 4 in Fig 2.2) was added to the bucket. The
bucket was then covered with a nappy liner and lid. The bucket lid had a 10 cm‐diameter
hole for ventilation (Fig. 2.4 B). The cages were placed in a growth room set at 25 0C and 50
% humidity. A humidifier was placed on a timer for 15 min on/15 min off over 3 h between
12 am and 3 am to increase humidity to 50 % for optimal mating conditions. The first eggs
were collected 3 days after the adults emerged and subsequent egg collections were carried
out every 3 days until no more eggs were laid. The eggs were placed on artificial diets to
hatch (Fig. 2.3). Second and third instar larvae were fed on fresh beans and re‐fed after a
further 5 days until the pupation stage.
33
Fig. 2.2: General procedure for Maruca rearing and maintenance
34
Fig. 2.3: Balconies in artificial diet placed in a larger lunch box
Fig. 2.4: Preparation of cages for emerging adults. (A) Set up of vermiculite and honey pots.
(B) cage covered with nappy liners and lid for egg collection
35
2.12 Preparation of plant tissue culture media
2.12.1 Preparation of MS Stock solutions
To make up the MS Macro stock solutions, the components in Table 2.9 were dissolved in
Reverse Osmosis (RO) water and made up to 1 L.
Table 2.9: Components to prepare MS Macro stock solutions
Chemicals Quantities to make 1 L
20 X MS Macro NH4NO3 33 gCaCl2.2H2O 8.8 g KNO3 38 g MgSO4.7H2O 7.4 gKH2PO4 3.4 g 200 X MS Micro H3BO3 1.245 gMgSO4 4.46 g ZnSO4.7H2O 1.72 gKI 166 mg NaMoO4 (1 mg/mL) 50 mL CuSO4 (1 mg/mL) 5 mLCoCl2 (1 mg/mL) 5 mL 200 X MS Iron 60 % FeCl3 solution 5.4 mL 200 X MS Na2EDTA Na2EDTA 6.71 g 100 X MS Vitamins thiamine HCl 10 mg nicotinic acid 50 mgpyridoxine HCl 50 mg Glycine 200 mg
36
2.12.2 Preparation of hormones, antibiotics and other agents
The following hormones and antibiotics were aseptically prepared by filter sterilization: 200
mM acetosyringone (0.3924 g dissolved in 10 mL dimethyl sulfoxide), 5 mg/mL asparagine, 1
mg/mL benzylaminopurine (BAP), 154 mg/mL dithiothreitol (DTT), 50 mg/mL geneticin (G418),
2 mg/mL gibberellic acid (GA3), 1 mg/mL indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA), 100 mg/mL kanamycin, 25
mg/L meropenem trihydrate (Wilmimgton, DE, USA), and 1 mM sodium thiosulphate. These
were stored at 40 C until required.
2.12.3 Cowpea suspension medium (for co‐cultivation)
To make 1 L of cowpea suspension medium, the components in Table 2.10 were added to 800
mL of sterile RO water. The pH was adjusted to 5.6 using 1N NaOH and the volume adjusted to
1 L. The suspension was dispensed into 2 x 500‐mL bottles and autoclaved. The following were
added when the medium had cooled to 50 0C: 125 µL of GA3 (2 mg/mL), 1 mL of acetosyringone
(200 mM), 1.7 mL of BAP (1 mg/mL stock) and 1 mL of sodium thiosulphate (1 mM).
Table 2.10: Components to prepare cowpea suspension medium
Chemicals Quantities to make 1 L
200 X MS Iron 0.5 mL 200 X MS EDTA 0.5 mL200 X MS Micro 0.5 mL 20 X MS Macro 50 mL100 X MS Vitamins 10 mL Sucrose 30 gMyo‐inositol 0.1 g MES Hydrate 3.9 gGranulated agar (Difco™). 8 g
2.12.4 Cowpea shoot induction medium (SIM)
To make 1 L of shoot induction medium, the components in Table 2.11 were added to 800 mL
sterile RO water. The pH was adjusted to 5.6 using 1N NaOH and volume adjusted to 1 L. The
suspension was dispensed into 2 x 500‐mL bottles and autoclaved. The medium was allowed to
cool to 500C, after which 1.7 mL of BAP (1 mg/mL stock), 25 mg of meropenem trihydrate, and
1.5 mL of kanamycin (100 mg/mL stock) or 600 µL geneticin (50 mg/mL stock) were added.
37
2.12.5 Cowpea shoot elongation and rooting medium (SEM)
To make 1 L of shoot elongation medium the components in Table 2.11 were added to 800 mL
sterile RO water. The pH was adjusted to 5.6 using 1N NaOH and volume adjusted to 1 L. The
suspension was dispensed into 2 x 500‐mL bottles and autoclaved. The medium was allowed to
cool to 500C and 250 µL of GA3 (2 mg/mL), 10 mL of asparagine (5 mg/mL), 100 µL of IAA (1
mg/mL), 25 mg of meropenem trihydrate and 600 µL geneticin (50 mg/mL) were added.
Table 2.11: Components to prepare cowpea shoot induction medium (SIM) and cowpea shoot elongation and rooting medium (SEM)
Quantities to make 1 L
Chemicals SIM SEM
200 X MS Iron 5 mL 5 mL 200 X MS EDTA 5 mL 5 mL 200 X MS Micro 5 mL 5 mL 20 X MS Macro 50 mL 50 mL 100 X MS Vitamins 10 mL 10 mL Sucrose 30 g 30 g Myo‐inositol 0.1 g 0.1 g MES Hydrate 3.9 g 3.9 g Granulated agar (Difco™) 8 g 8 g 6‐Benzyl‐aminopurine (BAP) 1.67 mg ‐ Gibberellic acid (GA3) ‐ 0.5 mg Asparagine ‐ 50 mg Indole‐3‐acetic acid (IAA) ‐ 0.1 mg
2.13 Isolation of plant genomic DNA
Plant genomic DNA was isolated using a nucleic acid isolation kit (Puregene, USA). To make 500
mL of cell lysis solution, 5 mL of 1 M Tris (pH 8) and 1 mL 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8) were added to 450
mL of RO water and autoclaved. A volume of 50 mL of 10 % SDS was added after the solution
cooled to 500C. Young leaves were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen. Approximately 20‐40
mg of frozen leaf was crushed and 800 L of cell lysis solution added. The samples were mixed
by vortexing and incubated at 65oC for 90 min. The samples were centrifuged at 12000 g for 5
min and the supernatant transferred to a fresh tube. An aliquot of 1 L of 10 mg/mL RNAse
38
solution was added, mixed and incubated at 37oC for 30 min. The samples were centrifuged at
12000 g for 3 min to pellet the debris, and the supernatant collected. The samples were cooled
at room temperature, 250 L of 6 M ammonium acetate added and vortexed for 20 s, after
which they were centrifuged at 13000 g for 5 min. The supernatant was transferred to a new
tube and 800 L of cold isopropanol added, mixed thoroughly and centrifuged at 13000 g for 5
min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet washed using 70% ethanol, centrifuged at
12000 g for 3 min and the supernatant discarded. A second centrifugation step was carried out
at 12000 g for 1 min and supernatant discarded. An aliquot of 50 L of TE buffer (10 mM Tris
pH8, 0.25 mM EDTA) was added to the pellet and air dried for 5 min. An aliquot of 1 L was
resolved by electrophoresis through a 0.8% agarose gel together with 50, 150 and 500 ng of
lambda DNA to estimate the DNA yield.
2.14 Protocol for PCR analysis of transgenic cowpea lines
A PCR analysis was carried out to confirm the presence of the vip3Ba gene in the transgenic
lines. For a 10 L PCR reaction, 100 ng genomic DNA of transgenic lines was used as a template.
In a PCR tube, 5 L of Phusion® Hot Start Flex 2X master mix (Cat # M0536S, New England
Biolabs), forward and reverse Vip3Ba primers (2 L each) or nptII primers and 10 L dH2O were
added. Genomic DNA was added and samples loaded for PCR under the following conditions:
980C for 30 s, 980C for 10 s, 600C for 20 s and 720C for 90 s (30 cycles), followed by 720C for 10
min and 250C for 1 min. The PCR products were fractionated by electrophoresis through a 1.8 %
agarose gel at 60 mA.
2.15 Detection of Vip3Ba protein by western blotting
Vip3Ba protein was detected in leaf extracts of transgenic plants by western blotting using
vip3Ba monoclonal antibodies commercially produced by Abmart Inc. (Juke Bio‐tech park,
200233, Shanghai, China). To raise the antibodies, the Vip3Ba protein sequence was subjected
to analysis to identify fragments that would most likely yield monoclonal antibodies. Eight
peptide epitopes were identified at various positions within the sequences. Eight peptide
antigens were designed and optimized for immunization of mouse to produce specific
antibodies against Vip3Ba (Abmart Inc., Juke Bio‐tech park, 200233, Shanghai, China).
39
Protein from transgenic plants was extracted by macerating 80‐110 mg of young fully expanded
cowpea leaf in 500 µL of protein extraction buffer (0.1 M TES pH7.6, 0.2 M NaCl, 1 mM PMSF, 1
mM EDTA) in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. The slurry was centrifuged at 12000 g for 5 min and the
protein concentration determined (Bradford 1976). For SDS PAGE, 40 g of total soluble protein
was mixed together with 8 l of loading dye and 2 l of DTT. Bacterial protein (1 g) containing
Vip3Ba was used as the positive control while a sample prepared from the non‐transgenic
parent line (IT86D) was used as a negative control. The samples were incubated at 65 0 C for 10
min and loaded onto a 10‐well NuPage 10% bis‐tris 1.5 mm precast gel (Invitrogen Cat#NP0315)
and electrophoresed at 150 V for 2 h on NuPage MOPS running buffer (50 mM MOPS, 50 mM
Tris‐base, 3.5 mM SDS, 1 mM EDTA). The polypeptides were transferred to nitrocellulose
membrane using the semi‐dry method of transfer (Thermo Scientific Pierce G2 Fast Blotter) at
25 V, 2 amps for 10 min. A post‐transfer check was carried out by staining the membrane with
1X Amido Black 10B stain for approximately 5 min. The membrane was blocked in 5 % low‐fat
milk in TBS buffer (20 mM Tris pH7.5, 0.5M NaCl,) either for at least 1 h on a shaker at 100 rpm
after which it was rinsed twice with TBS buffer for 5 min each, followed by a third rinse in TTBS
buffer (TBS buffer and 0.1 % Tween 20) for 5 min. The membrane was incubated (by shaking)
with the primary antibody (anti‐Vip3Ba from mouse) in a 1 in 500 dilution in 6 mL of TTBS
buffer and 6 mg of milk powder for 1 h. The membrane was rinsed three times with TTBS for 5
min each and incubated with the secondary antibody (anti‐mouse alkaline phosphatase
conjugate, Bio‐Rad, Gladesville, NSW 2111 Australia) in a 1 in 2000 dilution in 6 mL and 6 mg of
milk powder. The membrane was incubated for an hour and rinsed twice with TTBS for 5 min
each, and a final rinse with TBS for 5 min. The membrane was incubated with the substrate
(BCIP/NBT tablet (Sigma Cat. #B5655) dissolved in 12 mL of distilled water) on a shaking
platform (230 rpm), for 20 to 30 min for color development. Once the immunoreactive protein
bands were visible, the membrane was thoroughly rinsed in water to stop the reaction.
40
CHAPTER THREE
Toxicity of Vip3 proteins to the legume pod borer Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera)
3.1 Introduction
The Maruca pod borer (MPB), Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera), also known as legume pod borer,
is a pest that causes large losses in cowpea yields (Jackai, 1995; Singh & van Emden, 1979). MPB
occurs throughout tropical and sub‐tropical areas, but is most devastating in sub‐Saharan Africa
(Margam et al., 2011). The larvae feed on flower parts, green pods and seeds of cowpea and
several other leguminous crops (Singh & van Emden, 1979; Ba et al., 2009). Although MPB can
be controlled using insecticides (Ajeigbe & Singh, 2006; Kawuki et al., 2005), farmers in
developing countries do not spray as they can rarely afford the chemicals (Harwood, 1979).
Furthermore, inappropriate or excessive use of insecticides can be detrimental to human health
and the environment (Pimentel et al., 1992; Garry, 2004). Thus, alternative control strategies
for MPB are needed. One such strategy is based on the deployment of insect‐resistant
transgenic crops producing highly specific insecticidal proteins (cry toxins) from the soil
bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), so called Bt crops. Genes conferring resistance against
other pests have been isolated from Bt and transformed into crops, such as Bt corn and Bt
cotton carrying cry1Ab and cry1Ac genes, respectively. It has been shown that these Bt crops
are effectively protected against targeted insect pests, resulting in increased yields and reduced
insecticide applications (Schuler et al., 1998; Bravo et al., 2005; Qaim, 2009). Although Bt crops
have been very successful, studies have shown that insects can develop resistance to specific Bt
toxins, particularly in those carrying a single cry gene (Wilson et al., 1992; Shelton et al., 2002).
Stacking two resistance genes with differing mechanisms of action can substantially reduce the
likelihood of development of resistance (Roush, 1998). The vegetative insecticidal proteins
(Vips) of Bt, which are synthesized during the vegetative growth phase of the bacterium
(Estruch et al., 1996), bear no amino acid sequence similarity to Cry proteins and have a
different mechanism of action (Lee et al., 2003, Gouffon et al., 2011). Hence, they have been
used to complement Cry proteins for insect resistance management (IRM) in cotton
(Whitehouse et al., 2007).
41
Vip toxins with insecticidal activity are grouped according to their specificity for target insects.
The Vips have been shown to be active against a range of insect pests. The Vip1 and Vip2 toxins
are binary proteins active against coleopteran (Warren, 1997) and homopteran pests (Yu et al.,
2011a), respectively. Vip3 toxins are active against lepidopteran insects (Estruch et al., 1996;
Lee et al. 2003; Liu et al., 2007) making them potential candidates for MPB management. Vips
are activated by insect gut proteases upon ingestion and subsequently interact with specific
receptors found in the midgut epithelial tissue. This leads to formation of pores, rupture of the
epithelial cells and eventually cell death (Lee et al., 2003).
There are more than 70 vip genes encoding different Vip3 proteins listed in the Crickmore
database (http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/). These genes are
classified into 3 families, namely 3A, 3B and 3C, and further grouped into nine sub‐families in
3A (Vip3Aa to Ai), two 3B sub‐families (Vip3Ba and Bb) and one 3C family member (Vip3Ca)
based on nucleotide sequence similarities (Crickmore et al., 2014).
The work contained in this chapter was aimed at the identification of a vip3 gene product with
activity against MPB and potential to improve IRM in cowpea. Representatives of five vip3 gene
groups were isolated, cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli to produce Vip3 protein for
insect bioassays. A candidate gene encoding a Vip3Ba toxin was selected as a potential source
for MPB management in cowpea.
3.2 Materials and Methods
3.2.1 Bacterial strains
A collection of 267 putative Bt strains, previously collected throughout Australia (Beard et al.,
2001, 2008), were used in this study. The strains were cultured on LB medium as previously
described (section 2.1.1). E. coli strain BL21 (DE3) was used for protein expression as described
in section 2.4. All bacterial strains were stored in 30 % glycerol at ‐80 ºC.
3.2.2 PCR
A variety of different primer pairs were used in this study (Table 3.1) all of which were
synthesised by Sigma‐Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). The primers were designed to (i) screen the
42
Table 3.1: Primers used in this study: The underlined nucleotides in primer pairs of PCR set C define 6 His codons of the vector sequence.
PCR set Primer name
Sequence (5´ to 3´) Product length (bp)
PI‐PLC
F: CGCTATCAAATGGACCATGGR: GGACTATTCCATGCTGTACC 569
Vip3A group F:GATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCACTGG R:CGGCATGTTGTTAAAGTAAGAAAAGCTTTTGCTTG 827
A Vip3B group F:TGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCACTGGTATCAAAGAC R:CATAAAAGTGTAGACATTACCAATTTCACTTCCC
766
Vip3Ca F:TCTAAGAGCAAAACAAGGAATTTTTAAC R:GTTCAGATTCTAAAATAACTTTTGCATAATTG
500
Vip3Aa35
F:CCGCCAAGTGGTTTTATTAAA R:ATCGGAAAACTTGACAATAGGG
746
B
Vip3Af1 F:CCTTATCGGAGGTTATTTATGGTGATAC R:TAGTTGAAGACATAAGGTTGCTTCG 1090
Vip3Ag
F:CTTTTGAAAGATGAAAAAAATGGTGR:TTTTTCAAATAATACTTCACGGGG
390
Vip3Ba1
F:GGATGCCATGGTGGGATTTAGR:CTAATTATACCTTCGCCGTATAAGCG
587
V3Aa35_cds
F:CATCATCACCACCATCACAACAAGAATAATACTAAATTAAGCACAAG R:GTGGCGGCCGCTCTATTACTTAATAGAGACATCGGAAAACTTG
2,364
V3Af_cds
F:CATCATCACCACCATCACAATATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAG R:GTGGCGGCCGCTCTATTATTTAATAGAAACGTTTTCAAATGATATATG
2,367
C V3Ag_cds
F:CATCATCACCACCATCACAACAAGAATAATACTAAATTAAGCGCAAG R:GTGGCGGCCGCTCTATTACTTAATTGAAAAATCTCGGAAATTTATAGC
2,358
V3Ca2_cds
F:CATCATCACCACCATCACAACATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAGGG R:GTGGCGGCCGCTCTATTATTCAATCTTTTCCTTAATAGAAATATCACGAA
2,406
V3Ba1_cds
F:CATCATCACCACCATCACAACATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAGGGCC R:GTGGCGGCCGCTCTATTATTCTTTAACTATAGATACATCCGAAAAAATAACCCC
2,406
43
microbial collection for the presence of a phosphatidylinositol‐specific phospholipase C (PI‐PLC)
gene unique to Bacillus thuringiensis (PI‐PLC F/R; Lechner et al., 1989), and (ii) screen the Bt
strains for the presence of vip3 genes to enable the amplification of selected ORFs for
subsequent protein expression. Primer sequences for the latter purpose were designed using
DNA sequences of vip3 genes obtained from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information
(NCBI) database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).
To identify vip3 family‐specific genes, sequences were subjected to a multiple sequence
alignment in FASTA format using the Clustal W version 2.0 program hosted at the European
Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) (Larkin et al., 2007) with default settings to identify conserved
regions for primer design. To design primers for specific vip3 gene fragments and to amplify the
coding regions, the target gene sequences were retrieved from the NCBI database.
Genomic bacterial DNA was isolated from cultures using a Bacterial Genomic DNA isolation kit
as in section 2.2. The DNA was used as a template in PCR to test for the presence of the PI‐PLC
and vip3 genes using specific primers designed above. For each primer set, the following were
added to each tube: Distilled water (5.5 μl); forward primer (0.5 μl); reverse primer (0.5 μl) and;
mastermix (7.5 μl). The total volume (14 μl) was added into the well of a PCR plate followed by
1 μl (~100 ng) of bacterial DNA for each Bt strain to give a total of 15 μl in each well for PCR. A
negative control (distilled water) and a known positive control from a known Bt strain (serovar
kurstaki) were included. For the vip3A genes, bacterial DNA harbouring a vip3Aa gene, kindly
provided by Dan Llewellyn at CSIRO Plant Industry was used as a positive control while for the
vip3B gene, plasmid DNA from E. coli carrying a characterized vip3Bb2 gene cloned from Bt
strain C81 (Beard et al., 2008), was used as a positive control. The samples were subjected to
the following PCR conditions: 95 0C for 15 min; 30 cycles of 95 0C for 30 s, an annealing
temperature of 60 0C for 30 s and 72 0C for 2 min; an extension of 72 0C for 10 min and; 25 0C
for 1 min. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis through 1.8 % agarose gels in TBE
buffer. The amplicons were visualized under a transilluminator and gel documentation system.
3.2.3 Cloning of vip3 and cry2Aa genes in E. coli
The full coding regions of vip3 genes, vip3Aa35, vip3Ag and vip3Ba1, were isolated from Bt DNA
by PCR amplification while the full ORFs of vip3Af1 and vip3Ca2 were synthesized by GeneArt
44
synthesis, Life Technologies Australia Pty Ltd (Mulgrave VIC 3170 Australia), based on accession
numbers AJ872070 and JF916462, respectively. These were inserted into a pMk‐RQ (kanR)
vector flanked by a kanamycin resistance gene and an origin of replication site, Col E1 (Life
Technologies, Australia), and were subsequently amplified and isolated from the plasmids.
The PCR products of all five genes were purified (section 2.3) and transferred into pETite
vectors (section 2.4). The cells were cultured on LB plates containing 30 mg/L kanamycin and
incubated overnight at 37 0C. Single colonies were selected and grown overnight in LB liquid
medium containing 30 mg/L kanamycin for selection at 37 ºC on a shaker at 250 rpm. To
confirm the presence of the insert in the expression vector, plasmid DNA was extracted and
either used as a template for PCR analysis or for restriction mapping and finally, DNA
sequencing. The plasmid DNA of the positive clones was used to transform E. coli strain BL21
(DE3) for protein expression (section 2.4). The cry2Aa gene was previously cloned at CSIRO
Plant Industry lab by Dan Pikler and subsequently used in transforming E. coli strain BL21 to
express Cry2Aa protein.
3.2.4 Protein expression and analysis
E. coli transformed with the vip3 gene of interest or cry2Aa was plated on selection medium
and grown overnight at 37 ºC. Protein was extracted from bacterial cultures as described by
Studier (2005) (section 2.9). The protein concentrations of the supernatant and pellet fractions
were determined according to Bradford (1976) and 30 µg of protein was loaded on 10 % Bis‐Tris
precast NuPage gels (Invitrogen) for SDS‐PAGE analysis (section 2.16). Untransformed E. coli
(BL21) cells were used as a negative control and E. coli transformed with cry2Aa was used as a
positive control (Srinivasan 2008). Mass spectrometry of selected protein bands was used to
confirm that the specified protein bands were Vips (section 2.10).
3.2.5 Insect bioassays
A replicated series of bioassays using MPB larvae was carried out with proteins encoded by the
gene representing each of the five groups. Earlier experiments with Cry1A or 2A toxins at Plant
Industry indicated that levels in the range of 1‐20 µg/g diet of Cry1A or 2A were toxic to MPB
larvae (data not shown). Since there was no data available for Vip toxins, a wider range of toxin
concentration was used initially. Five concentrations of each Vip3 protein (unpurified) were
45
therefore used in preparing artificial MPB diets (Jackai and Raulston, 1988): 0, 3, 10, 30 and 100
µg of Vip3 protein per gram of diet. Diets with Cry2Aa protein (at 0, 3, 10 and 30 µg/g diet) and
without Bt protein represented positive and negative controls in the bioassays, respectively. To
calculate the amount of Vip or Cry protein to be incorporated in the artificial diet, the amount
of Vip or Cry toxin present was first estimated based on the Vip protein bands as seen on the
coomassie stained gels, and then calculated accordingly. For instance, if the Vip3Ba or Cry2Aa
protein band represented 10 % of the total bacterial protein in the gel, then this figure was
used calculate the quantity of freeze‐dried total protein to be added to the artificial diet, to
obtain concentrations of 3, 10, 30, or 100 µg per g of diet. The bacterial proteins were dissolved
in 50 mM sodium carbonate (pH 11.2) and incorporated into 50 ml of diet. For Vip3Ba protein,
both the soluble and insoluble fractions were used. The diet was dispensed into Petri plates and
allowed to solidify at room temperature. Prior to commencing the assays, the diet was further
divided into 16 cubes of ~2.5 g each, and placed in 16 individual wells of a plastic feeding tray.
For each protein concentration, one first‐instar larva was introduced into each well containing
one cube of diet (i.e., N = 16 larvae per concentration) and sealed with a perforated film using a
hot sealer. These were incubated in a climate chamber at 26 oC and 50 % RH. After 10 days,
when larvae in the negative control experiments reached their fifth instar, mortality was scored
and the weight of all surviving larvae was recorded using a digital microbalance. There were
three separate bioassays conducted for each protein. Mortality and average weight was
calculated from the pooled data of all bioassays.
3.3 Results
3.3.1 Selection of candidate vip3 genes
A bioinformatics approach was initially used to identify a diverse range of Vip3 proteins as
candidates for subsequent expression and testing for insecticidal activity against MPB. This was
done by comparing the amino acid sequences of vip3 genes from all three families (3A, 3B and
3C) in the Bt nomenclature database
(http://www.lifesci.sussex.ac.uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/vip.html). The majority (93/102) of
the vip3 genes in the database belong to the 3A family with 61 of the 3A sequences belonging
to the “Aa” subfamily. Analysis of these 61 sequences using a pair‐wise sequence alignment
tool (EMBOSS Water) (www.ebi.ac.uk) revealed they were more than 95 % identical. Based on
this analysis, protein Vip3Aa35 was arbitrarily selected as the point of reference and was
46
designated to represent Group 1. Alignment of the amino acid sequence of Vip3Aa35 with all
other Vip3 proteins was subsequently carried out revealing that the other Vip3 proteins
clustered into four groups (designated 2‐5) with between 90 and 60 %, identity with Vip3Aa35,
respectively (Table 3.2). Based on these sequence comparisons, the proteins Vip3Aa35 (Group
1), Vip3Af1 (Group 2), Vip3Ag (Group 3), Vip3Ca2 (Group 4) and Vip3Ba1 (Group 5) were
selected as the candidate proteins for further analysis.
Table 3.2: Grouping of Vip3 proteins on the basis of percentage amino acid sequence identity
with reference protein Vip3Aa35
vip3 protein
Group
Aa35
Aa35 1 100 Af1 2 89.2Ag 3 82.2 Ca2 4 70.1Ba1 5 61.8
3.3.2 Confirmation of Bt strains
The Bt strains provided for use in this study had been collected throughout Australia from
previous work. To confirm their identity as Bacillus thuringiensis, DNA was extracted from the
bacterial colonies and used as a template in PCR with Bt‐specific primer pair, PI‐PLC F/R,
designed to amplify a 569 bp fragment of the PI‐PLC gene. Of the 267 strains tested, a product
of the expected size was amplified from 224 strains confirming that they were indeed Bacillus
thuringiensis (Fig. 3.1).
47
Fig. 3.1: Identification of putative Bt strains by PCR using PI‐PLC primers. Lane M: DNA
Molecular marker; Lanes 1 to 10: DNA template from ten putative Bt strains; N: water (negative
control); P: DNA from Bt strain kurstaki (positive control).
48
3.3.3 Identification of Bt strains containing candidate vip3 genes
The strategy to identify Bt strains containing the candidate vip3 genes initially involved the
identification of Bt strains containing vip3A, vip3B and vip3C sequences. The sequences of vip3
genes were aligned and conserved regions were identified from which Vip3A, 3B and 3C family‐
specific primers were designed (Table 3.1; PCR Set A). Since the sequence of only one member
of the Vip3C family, gene vip3Ca2, was available at the commencement of this study, primers
were designed to specifically amplify this sequence (Table 3.1).
When the 224 Bt strains were tested for the presence of vip3A genes using the vip3A family‐
specific primer set, an amplicon of the expected size (827 bp) was present in 78 strains (35 %)
(Fig. 3.2). Using a random selection of 165 Bt strains, amplicons of the expected size (766 bp)
were obtained from eight strains using primers to detect the presence of vip3B genes (Fig. 3.3).
No amplicons were obtained using the Vip3Ca primer set from 224 strains tested.
Following the identification of Bt strains containing vip3A and vip3B genes, primers were
designed which would specifically amplify fragments of the four candidate vip3 genes, namely
vip3Aa35, vip3Af1, vip3Ag and vip3Ba (Table 3.1; PCR Set B). When the Bt strains identified
above were tested by PCR using these primers, PCR products of the expected sizes for
vip3Aa35, vip3Af1, vip3Ag and vip3Ba1 were amplified from a number of strains (Table 3.3).
The DNA of these strains was subsequently used as a template to amplify the full coding
sequences (CDS) of the four genes for subsequent cloning into a protein expression vector.
Primer pairs were designed to amplify the entire open reading frames (ORFs) of each of the
four genes. In order for the primers in this set to be compatible with the expression vector, a
His tag sequence (18 nucleotides long) was added to each ORF after the start codon for protein
purification (Table 3.1; Primer Set C). Amplicons of the expected size (~2.3 to 2.4 kb) were
obtained using primers designed to amplify the CDS of genes vip3Aa35, vip3Ag and vip3Ba but
no amplification was observed using the V3Af_cds primer pair. Therefore, the coding sequence
of vip3Af was synthesized as was the coding sequence of vip3Ca2 since no Bt strains containing
vip3C gene were identified.
49
Fig. 3.2: Identification of Bt strains carrying vip3A genes by PCR. Lane M: DNA Molecular
marker; Lanes 1 to 10: DNA template from 10 Bt strains; N: water (negative control); P:
bacterial DNA harbouring a vip3Aa gene (positive control).
Fig. 3.3: Identification of Bt strains carrying vip3B genes by PCR. Lane M: DNA Molecular
marker; Lanes 108 to 117: DNA template from 10 Bt strains; N: water (negative) control and P:
plasmid DNA containing the vip3Bb2 gene (positive control).
50
3.3.4 Expression of vip3 genes in E. coli
The coding regions of the five genes were cloned in pETite vectors for subsequent protein
expression. To confirm the presence of the genes in the expression vectors, plasmid DNA was
extracted and either used as a template for PCR analysis or for restriction mapping and finally,
DNA sequencing. Sequence analysis (based on global alignment) of the five cloned candidate
vip3 gene sequences revealed they were identical (taking into account the His tag sequences) to
their respective counterparts in the Crickmore database (Table 3.4; Appendix I).
The plasmids containing the five vip3 genes (vip3Aa35, vip3Af1, vip3Ag, vip3Ba1 and vip3Ca2)
were subsequently transformed into E. coli strain BL21 for protein expression. The cry2Aa had
been previously cloned and was also transformed into E. coli strain BL21 for Cry2Aa expression.
Soluble and insoluble protein fractions were extracted from each of the five vip3‐transformed
cultures and the cry2Aa‐transformed culture and these were analysed for the presence of the
Vip and Cry2Aa proteins using SDS‐PAGE and MS. Equivalent fractions from untransformed E.
coli were also extracted as controls. When the extracts were analysed by SDS‐PAGE, no bands
of the expected size (~90 kDa for Vip3 proteins) were seen in the either the soluble or insoluble
fractions derived from any vip3‐transformed cells. However, a major band of about 75 kDa, was
present in extracts from E. coli transformed with vip3Aa35, vip3Af1, vip3Ag, vip3Ba1 and
vip3Ca2, with some lower MW bands also observed in some extracts These bands, which were
absent from the untransformed control extracts, were mostly in the insoluble fraction for
Vip3Aa35, Vip3Af1, Vip3Ag and Vip3Ca2 (Fig 3.4 A‐D), although the 75 kDa band was present in
both the soluble and insoluble fractions from E. coli transformed with vip3Ba1 (Fig. 3.4 E). High
molecular weight bands (greater than 250 kDa) were also observed in the soluble fractions
extracted from E. coli transformed with vip3Aa35, vip3Af1, vip3Ag and vip3Ca2 (Fig. 3.4, lanes 2
in A‐D). When extracts from Cry2Aa‐transformed and non‐transformed E. coli were analysed, a
major band of the size expected for the Cry2Aa protein (~65 kDa) was present in the insoluble
fraction from the Cry2Aa‐transformed cells (Fig. 3.4 F). In addition to the ~65 kDa band, several
additional lower MW bands were also present in the insoluble fraction.
51
Table 3.3: Examples of Bt strains harbouring target vip3 genes
Group vip3 gene Strain(s)
1 vip3Aa35 45, 47, 49 and 117
2 vip3Af1 99, 100, 107, 113, 121, 122 and 130
3 vip3Ag 100
4 vip3Ca2 None identified
5 vip3Ba1 7 and 46
Table 3.4: DNA sequence analysis of target vip3 genes from groups 1 to 5 (with the His tag sequences deleted)
Group Target gene Reference gene in database
% Identity to reference gene
No. of amino acids encoded
1 vip3Aa35 GU733921.1 100 789
2 vip3Af1 AJ872070.1 100 788
3 vip3Ag FJ556803.2 100 787
4 vip3Ca2 JF916462.1 100 803
5 vip3Ba1 AY823271.1 100 803
52
To determine whether the protein bands migrating at ~75 kDa in the insoluble fractions derived
from the five vip3‐transformed cultures were the target Vips, the bands were excised and
analysed by MS/MS. Subsequent interpretation of the MS/MS data using the Mascot database
revealed that the highest Mascot scores were with Vip sequences. The protein coverage of
Vip3A proteins ranged between 55 and 70%, Vip3Ca was 70 % and Vip3Ba protein coverage was
76 % (Table 3.5). Based on this data, it was considered highly likely that the 75 kDa bands were
indeed the target Vips. When one of the high molecular weight bands (>250 kDa) from the
soluble fraction from Group 2 was subjected to mass spectrometry analysis it was found to be
composed of Vip3Af1 sequences with a Mascot score of 1347 and 39% coverage (Table 3.5). On
close examination of the vip3 proteins, the difference lies at the C‐terminal end of the proteins
with two highly conserved proteolytic cleavage sites repeated four times
(DCCEEDDCCEEDDCCEEDDCCEED) in Vip3Ba1. This generates a sequence rich in negatively
charged cysteines (Fig. 3.5).
3.3.5 Insect bioassays
To test the insecticidal activity of the bacterially‐expressed Vip3Aa35, Vip3Af1, Vip3Ag,
Vip3Ba1, Vip3Ca2 and Cry2Aa proteins, a replicated series of bioassays using MPB larvae was
carried out. In preliminary bioassays, the incorporation of unpurified protein extracts from non‐
transformed E. coli incorporated into an artificial MPB diet was found to have no effect on
mortality of MPB larvae and the insects grew normally to pupation (data not shown). As such,
although a His tag was included to assist in purification of the Vip3 proteins, purification was
not considered necessary and unpurified Vip proteins were incorporated into the artificial diets
in all bioassays. Five concentrations (0, 3, 10, 30 and 100 µg) of each freeze‐dried, unpurified
Vip3 protein and four concentrations (0, 3, 10 and 30 µg) of Cry2Aa protein were incorporated
per gram into an artificial MPB diet (see 3.2.6) and the effect on MPB larvae was investigated
over a 10‐day period.
The average weight of negative control larvae fed on diets without Vips or Cry2Aa protein
consistently ranged between 70 and 80 mg after 10 days growth. Further, all larvae fed on the
control diet developed into the fifth‐instar stage of their life cycle. For larvae fed on Cry2Aa
diets, the average mortality at 3, 10 and 30 µg per g was 13, 10.6 and 36 %, respectively. On
53
average, the growth of surviving larvae on this diet at 3, 10 and 30 µg per g diet was reduced by
91, 98 and 99%, respectively (Fig. 3.6) and they only developed to their second instar (data not
shown). In all diets containing Vip3Aa35, Vip3Af1, Vip3Ag and Vip3Ca2, apart from one bioassay
with Vip3Af1, there was little or no effect observed on the growth or development of MPB
larvae and all larvae developed to fifth instars (Fig. 3.7).
54
Fig. 3.4: SDS‐PAGE analysis of Vip3 and Cry2Aa proteins expressed in E. coli. Panels A‐F are stained gels from studies involving the expression of Vip3Aa35, Vip3Af1, Vip3Ag, Vip3Ca2, Vip3Ba1 and Cry2Aa, respectively. Lane M: Protein molecular weight marker (kDa). Lane 1: Soluble protein fraction of untransformed E. coli. Lane 2: Soluble protein fraction of E. coli transformed with its respective vip or cry gene. Lane 3: Insoluble protein fraction of untransformed E. coli. Lane 4: Insoluble protein fraction of E. coli transformed with its respective vip or cry gene. * Denotes bands which are only present in the protein extracts derived from transformed E. coli.
55
Table 3.5: MS/MS identification of the putative Vip3 proteins expressed in E. coli
Group Identification Mascot score Protein coverage
1 Vip3Aa 10118 55% 2 Vip3Af1 5324 68% 3 Vip3Ag 9379 70% 4 Vip3Ca 4634 71% 5 Vip3Ba 8861 76%
In contrast, the growth of larvae fed on a diet containing Vip3Ba1 was reduced by 83.8, 84.2,
71.8 and 89.2 % at concentrations of 3, 10, 30 and 100 µg per g of diet, respectively (Fig 3.6).
The mortality at 3 µg per g diet was 13 %. Most surviving larvae on this diet only developed to
their third instar stage (Fig. 3.6).
56
Results for Vip3Ba
.........10........20........30........40........50........60........70........ AA MNMNNTKLNARALPSFIDYFNGIYGFATGIKDIMNMIFKTDTGGGNLTLDEILKNQDLLNQISDKLDGINGDLGDLIAQ DB_state DB_conf 80........90........100.......110.......120.......130.......140.......150...... AA GNLNSELTKELLKIANEQNLMLNNVNAQLNSINATLNTYLPKITSMLNEVMKQNYVLSLQIEFLSKQLQEISDKLDIIN DB_state DB_conf .160.......170.......180.......190.......200.......210.......220.......230..... AA LNVLINSTLTEITPAYQRIKYVNDKFDELTSTVEKNPKINQDNFTEDVIDNLTDLTELARSVTRNDMDSFEFYIKTFHD DB_state DB_conf ..240.......250.......260.......270.......280.......290.......300.......310.... AA VMIGNNLFSRSALKTASELIAKENIHTRGSEIGNVYTFMIVLTSLQAKAFLTLTTCRKLLGLADIDYTQIMNENLDREK DB_state 0 DB_conf 8 ...320.......330.......340.......350.......360.......370.......380.......390... AA EEFRLNILPTLSNDFSNPNYTETLGSDLVDPIVTLEAEPGYALIGFEILNDPLPVLKVYQAKLKPNYQVDKESIMENIY DB_state DB_conf ....400.......410.......420.......430.......440.......450.......460.......470.. AA GNIHKLLCPKQREQKYYIKDMTFPEGYVITKIVFEKKLNLLGYEVTANLYDPFTGSIDLNKTILESWKEDCCEEDCCEE DB_state 0 00 00 DB_conf 8 99 98 .....480.......490.......500.......510.......520.......530.......540.......550. AA DCCEEDCCEELYKIIEADTNGVYMPLGVISETFLTPIYSFKLIIDEKTKKISLAGKSYLRESLLATDLVNKETNLIPSP DB_state 00 00 DB_conf 88 88 ......560.......570.......580.......590.......600.......610.......620.......630 AA NGFISSIVQNWHITSDNIEPWKANNKNAYVDKTDAMVGFSSLYTHKDGEFLQFIGAKLKAKTEYIIQYTVKGNPEVYLK DB_state DB_conf .......640.......650.......660.......670.......680.......690.......700.......710 AA NNKDICYEDKTNNFDTFQTITKKFNSGVDPSEIYLVFKNQIGYEAWGNNFIILEIKSLETLPQILKPENWIPLGNAEIK DB_state 0 DB_conf 8 ........720.......730.......740.......750.......760.......770.......780.......790AA EDGKIEISGNGSMNQYIQLEQNSKYHLRFSVKGKGRVTMQAQTSHINVPATNEEVSIMIETTRLYGEGIISLLNDEVEN DB_state DB_conf .........800. AA SGVIFSDVSIVKE DB_state DB_conf
Key: AA ‐ amino acid sequence DB state ‐ predicted disulfide bonding state (1+disulfide bonded, 0=not disulfide bonded) DB conf ‐ confidence of disulfide state prediction (0=low to 9=high)
Fig. 3.5: The full Vip3Ba amino acid sequence. The highly conserved cysteine regions are
highlighted in yellow, while the predicted disulphide bonding is highlighted in green (Ceroni et
al., 2006).
57
Fig. 3.6: Maruca larvae after 10 days feeding on artificial diet with and without Bt toxin. (A): Larvae on a diet containing no Bt toxin (0 µg toxin per g diet), (B): Larvae on a diet containing 3 µg of Vip3Ba toxin per g of diet.
58
B
C
Fig. 3.7: Effect of Vip and Cry2Aa proteins on the average weight of surviving MPB larvae after 10 days on artificial diets containing different levels of toxins. Assays were repeated three times. (A): Group 1 (Vip3Aa35) and Cry2Aa proteins, (B): Group 2 (Vip3Af1) and Cry2Aa proteins, (C): Group 3 (Vip3Ag) and Cry2Aa proteins, (D): Group 4 (Vip3Ca2) and Cry2Aa proteins and (E): Group 5 (Vip3Ba1) and Cry2Aa proteins.
E
A
D
59
3.4 Discussion The aim of this work was to identify a vip3 gene in a collection of Australian Bt strains that
encoded a toxin active against the Maruca pod borer (Lepidoptera). These genes were
targeted as they are known to have insecticidal activity against certain lepidopteran pests
(Estruch et al., 1996; Beard et al., 2008). To increase the probability of identifying a vip3 gene
product with activity against MPB, a diverse range of Vip3‐encoded proteins were targeted.
The selection of the target proteins was based on sequence analysis of Vip3 amino acid
sequences in the Bt database. Since approximately 60 % of sequences in the Bt database
encoded Vip3Aa proteins with 95 % amino acid identity, Vip3Aa35 was arbitrarily chosen as a
target. Using Vip3Aa35 as a reference, four additional Vip3 target proteins, namely Vip3Af1,
Vip3Ag, Vip3Ca2 and Vip3Ba1, were selected whose amino acid sequences showed between
90‐60 % identity to vip3Aa35.
The screening of the Australian Bt collection for genes encoding the target Vip3 proteins
revealed that it was dominated by vip3A genes (35 %), with a small number of vip3B genes (5
%) and no vip3C genes. The percentage of Bt strains containing vip3A genes in this study was in
general agreement to that reported in several other studies where the incidence of vip3A
genes ranged from 18 to 87 % (Doss et al., 2002; Bhalla et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2007; Beard et
al., 2008; Hernandez‐Rodriguez et al., 2009; Yu et al., 2011b). The abundance of vip3 genes
observed in the current study was also generally in accordance with the Bt database
(Crickmore et al., 2014) where the majority of vip3 genes belong to the A family, with lesser
members in the B family and very few members in family C. One of the Bt strains that was
found to contain a vip3 gene in the present study was previously found to contain cry1 and
cry2 genes by Beard et al. (2001), indicating that both vip and cry genes can exist in one Bt
strain. A similar situation was also reported by Seifinejad et al. (2008) and Hernandez‐
Rodriguez et al. (2009). In the current study, one Bt strain (strain 100) was also found to harbor
two vip3 genes belonging to family A, namely vip3Af1 and vip3Ag. The presence of two or
more vip3A genes in a single Bt strain has also been reported by others (Hernandez‐Rodriguez
et al., 2009; Li et al., 2012; Sauka et al., 2013), indicating the random distribution of various
vip3A‐type genes among B. thuringiensis (Yu et al., 2011b). This observation shows the
60
diversity of vip3‐type genes represented in the Bt pool and indicates that these genes are
abundant in nature.
Using PCR with primers designed to the target gene sequences, vip3Aa35, vip3Af1, vip3Ag and
vip3Ba1 were identified in the Bt collection whereas no Bt isolate containing vip3Ca2 was
identified. Primers were subsequently designed to amplify the full coding sequence of
vip3Aa35, vip3Af1, vip3Ag and vip3Ba1 and the CDS of three of the five target vip genes
(vip3Aa35, vip3Ag and vip3Ba1) was amplified for subsequent cloning into a protein expression
vector. It was necessary to chemically synthesise the coding sequences of vip3Af1 and vip3Ca2
because they were either unable to be cloned (vip3Af1) or were not found in the Bt collection
(vip3Ca2). Following cloning, the five vip3 genes were expressed in E. coli. Based on the amino
acid sequence of the encoded proteins, the expected sizes of the proteins were around 90 kDa.
This was consistent with the sizes of Vip3 proteins reported by others (Yu et al., 2011b; Estruch
et al., 1996; Hernandez et al., 2013; Palma et al., 2012, Beard et al., 2008).
SDS‐PAGE analysis of the expressed target proteins revealed the presence of a major band of
approximately 75 kDa which was mainly present in the insoluble fraction for Vip3Aa35,
Vip3Af1, Vip3Ag and Vip3Ca2 but in both soluble and insoluble fractions for Vip3Ba1. High
molecular weight bands and some lower bands were also found in some of the Vip3 protein
extracts. The high molecular bands are possibly aggregates, a phenomenon common reported
during the overexpression of recombinant protein in E. coli (Lebendiker and Danieli, 2014). This
can sometimes be overcome by the use of fusion proteins and buffers or solvents to obtain
stable proteins and proper protein folding (Sorensen and Mortensen, 2005; Bondos and
Bicknell, 2003). It is possible that the low molecular weight bands reflect degradation products
of the recombinant protein. Andberg et al. (2007) reported that proteins with purification tags
were easily cleaved in the presence of a buffer and metal salts. This is likely with the Vip
proteins in this work as they contained His tags and were combined with a buffer that
contained Tris‐HCl and sodium salts.
Although the sizes of the five expressed Vips were predicted to be approximately 90 kDa, the
major band observed in the protein extracts in this study was approximately 75 kDa. This was
not entirely unexpected as it is known that the migration of proteins electrophoresed through
61
SDS‐PAGE is influenced by many numerous factors and does not always provide an accurate
reflection of their molecular weight (Jong et al., 1978). For example, one possible reason why
the protein extracts resolved at 75 kDa is the fact that an increased pH in the Tris‐glycine
buffer system accelerates the rate of protein migration on SDS‐PAGE (Schagger and von Jagow,
1987; Liu and Chang, 2010). To provide definitive evidence that the 75 kDa bands were indeed
the target vips, the protein bands were excised and analysed by MS/MS. The analysis revealed
that the bands were indeed the target proteins and, based on this evidence, the proteins were
used for insect bioassays.
A protein solubility prediction (Wilkinson and Harrison 1991) carried out for the Vip3 protein
sequences revealed that the chances of full solubility of most of these proteins when over‐
expressed in E. coli were low. For example, the solubility scores for Vip3Aa35, Vip3Af, Vip3Ag
and Vip3Ca2 ranged from 37 to 48 %. In contrast, Vip3Ba was predicted to have a 59.1 %
chance of being soluble. Further, when Rang et al. (2005) and Beard et al. (2008) over‐
expressed Vip3Ba1 and Vip3Bb2 proteins in E. coli, they were shown to be present in the
soluble and insoluble fractions, respectively. In another study, Palma et al. (2013) reported that
Vip3Aa45 and Vip3Ag4 were present in both the soluble and insoluble fractions, while
Escudero et al. (2014) and Hernandez‐Martinez et al. (2013) extracted soluble forms of Vip3Aa,
Vip3Ab, Vip3Ad, Vip3Ae and Vip3Af. Based on this information, both the soluble and insoluble
fractions of the protein extract derived from the five targeted vips were analysed by SDS‐PAGE.
To assess the effect of the Vips on larvae of MPB, bioassays were conducted where various
concentrations of the Vips were incorporated into an artificial MPB diet and the effect on MPB
larvae was investigated over a 10‐day period. The results from these bioassays showed that Vip
proteins from the 3A and 3C families (Vip3Aa35, Vip3Af1, Vip3Ag, Vip3Ca2) had no effect on
caterpillar growth, with the MPB larvae fed on diets containing these proteins developing into
their fifth and final instar stages. Palma et al. (2012) also reported that Vip3C toxin had little or
no effect on seven other lepidopteran pests. However, several studies have reported growth‐
inhibiting effects of five different Vip3A proteins on selected lepidopteran pests (Estruch et al.,
1996; Chakroun et al., 2012; Hernandez‐Martinez et al., 2013). In the current study, Vip3Ba
toxin was shown to inhibit the growth of MPB larvae by 90 % when exposed to 3 ppm of the
toxin (soluble and insoluble fractions). These results are consistent with, and extend the data
62
of Rang et al. (2005), who demonstrated that Vip3Ba impaired the larval growth of two other
lepidopteran species (Ostrinia nubilalis and P. xylostella).
The results presented in this chapter demonstrate for the first time that the growth of MPB
larvae is severely inhibited by low levels of Vip3Ba protein. Thus, it is proposed that the vip3Ba
gene could complement cry genes in the development of Bt cowpeas resistant to MPB, thus
contributing to an effective strategy for insect resistance management. This combination
would considerably reduce the likelihood of development of resistance in MPB, help to
increase yield and income, and reduce the dependency on pesticides.
63
CHAPTER FOUR
Transgenic cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) expressing Bacillus
thuringiensis (Bt) Vip3Ba protein to protect against the Maruca pod borer
(Maruca vitrata)
4.1 Introduction
Cowpea is an important grain legume in the developing world. It is cultivated in the tropics
with West Africa producing close to 5 million tonnes of dry grain (FAOSTAT, 2013). It is adapted
to the savannah region because of its drought tolerance (Boukar et al., 2013) and is grown by
resource‐poor farmers for multiple uses including food and fodder (Nkongolo et al., 2009;
Labuschagne et al., 2008; Murdock et al., 2008).
Cowpea production is constrained by diseases and pests, with insects causing significant
economic losses. The insect pests that attack cowpea include pod sucking bugs, weevils, flower
bud thrips and pod borers, and are responsible for cowpea losses of increasing economic
significance (Singh and van Emden, 1979). The Lepidoptera pests, which include the cowpea
seed moth, Cydia ptychora, and the pod borers, among others, are of major concern and can
account for losses up to 100 % (Jackai and Daoust, 1986). MPB is the most devastating insect
pest responsible for losses of up to 80 % if no control measures are employed. The larva is the
most destructive stage of this pest (Jackai and Daoust, 1986; Ngakou et al., 2008; Singh & van
Emden, 1979).
The development of host plant resistance has been very successful in controlling certain insect
pests. Cowpea lines with resistance to the cowpea curculio beetle, aphids and flower thrips
have been developed in national breeding programmes and adopted in several countries (Hall
et al., 2003). Breeding for host plant resistance, however, has not proved to be practical for
MPB. Although wild Vigna species containing genes for resistance to MPB exist, these genes
could not be crossed into cowpea due to sexual incompatibility (Fatokun, 2002). As such,
controlling infestations of MPB has been achieved through the use of insecticides and
microbial biopesticide formulations (Taylor, 1968). However, farmers in the tropics can rarely
afford them (Isman, 2010).
64
Genetic engineering has been proposed as an option to improve cowpea yields (Machuka et
al., 2000). Incorporating useful genes into cowpea germplasm using genetic engineering
depends on the availability of a reproducible transformation system to generate transgenic
plants (Popelka et al., 2006; Aragao and Campos, 2007; Citadin et al., 2013). In vitro plant
regeneration techniques have been applied to grain legumes via direct shoot organogenesis
(Raveendar et al., 2009; Le et al., 2002) and indirect organogenesis comprising the
establishment of callus cultures, somatic embryogenesis or embryogenic cell suspension
cultures (Aasim et al., 2010; Ramakrishan et al., 2005; Anand et al., 2000). In these techniques,
various workers have utilized different organs or tissues as the starting material including
mature seeds (Raveendar et al., 2009), cotyledonary nodal cuttings (Le et al., 2002; Popelka et
al., 2006; Chaudhury et al., 2007) mature embryos (Penza et al., 1991), plumules (Aasim et al.,
2010) or shoot apices (Mao et al., 2006). Despite several reports over nearly three decades, the
genetic engineering of cowpea is still challenging, consistent with the generally recalcitrant
nature of legumes to in vitro manipulation (Somers et al., 2003). This is well illustrated by the
many methods that have been trialled using cowpea regeneration via somatic embryogenesis
and direct multiple shoot organogenesis (Garcia et al., 1987; Brar et al., 1999; Popelka et al.,
2006; Chaudhury et al., 2007; Raveendar et al., 2009; Behura et al., 2015).
Garcia et al. (1987) were among the first to attempt transformation experiments in cowpeas
using Agrobacterium. Although transgene expression in callus cultures was reported, no
regenerated plants were obtained. More recently, Agrobacterium‐mediated and biolistic
transformation have been used successfully to introduce genes conferring traits of potential
agronomic importance into cowpea. These traits include insect resistance, herbicide resistance
and virus resistance (Popelka et al., 2006; Adesoye et al., 2008; Solleti et al., 2008; Higgins et
al., 2012; Citadin et al., 2013; Cruz and Aragao, 2014).
A cry transgene has been recently used to generate many cowpea lines expressing Cry 1Ab
protein and one line was selected as a breeding parent following several years of field trialling
against Maruca in the field in West Africa (Higgins et al., 2012; Mohammed et al., 2014). It has
been shown, however, that insects can develop field‐evolved resistance to a single Bt gene
(Mahon, 2007). As such, it is possible that Maruca could eventually develop resistance to the
Cry 1Ab protein. To manage this possible resistance to the Bt cowpea, a second Bt gene with a
65
different mechanism of action could be combined with the cry gene in the existing cowpea
line. Stacking of a vip3 and the cry1Ab gene is proposed here as a long‐term solution for
resistance management.
In the previous chapter, a vip3Ba gene was isolated and its product shown to strongly inhibit
the growth and development of MPB larvae. This gene was therefore selected as a candidate
to transform cowpea. This chapter describes the transformation of cowpea with the vip3Ba
gene optimized for expression in plants and using Agrobacterium tumefaciens for transfer. The
transgenic lines were shown to express the vip3Ba gene at varying levels. Laboratory‐based
bioassays with MPB feeding on cowpea leaf material from four different cowpea lines with
varying concentrations of Vip3Ba confirmed that Vip3Ba was a very effective toxin for the
control of MPB larvae. Therefore, stacking the vip3Ba gene with cry genes such as cry1Ab is
proposed for sustainable MPB management.
4.2 Materials and methods
4.2.1 Construction of a Vip3Ba gene for plant expression
To enhance the expression of the Bt vip3Ba gene in cowpea, the coding region was modified
according to Perlak et al. (1991). The GC content was increased, polyadenylation signals and
mRNA destabilizing sequence motifs were deleted and plant‐preferred codons were used. The
re‐designed gene was synthesized by GeneArt and inserted into an Agrobacterium
tumefaciens‐ binary vector based on pART27 (Gleave, 1992) but in which the Nos‐NptII was
replaced with an S1‐Npt II from pPLEX 502 (Schunmann et al., 2003) using the assembly
method described by Gibson (2009) and Gibson et al. (2011) in section 2.4.2. The expression of
the vip3Ba gene was under the control of the Arabidopsis small subunit promoter and
Nicotiana tabacum small subunit 3’ end derived from pSF 12 (Tabe et al., 1995). Electro‐
competent A. tumefaciens AGL1 cells were transformed with the binary vector by
electroporation (see section 2.7). Plasmid DNA was extracted from the AGL1 cells as described
in section 2.2.3 and used to re‐transform E. coli (section 2.8).
66
4.2.2 Transformation of cowpea
4.2.2.1 Preparation of Agrobacterium culture
An aliquot of 400 µL of glycerol stock of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL1 (Lazo et
al., 1991) containing the Vip3Ba construct was added to 100 mL of MGL liquid medium (section
2.1.2) in a sterile 250 mL flask. Spectinomycin (50 mg/L) was added for selection. The culture
was grown overnight in an orbital shaker at 28 ºC at 200 rpm and centrifuged for 15 min at
7500 g at room temperature. The pellet was re‐suspended in 100 mL of cowpea suspension
liquid medium (section 2.12.3) by placing on an orbital shaker at 200 rpm for a minimum of 1 h
at 28 ºC. An additional 100 mL of cowpea suspension liquid medium was added to the
Agrobacterium culture prior to infection of explants, making a total of 200 mL, sufficient to
immerse 400 explants in eight 250 mL flasks.
4.2.2.2 Preparation of cowpea explants and Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation
The transformation of cowpea was a modified version of a protocol by Popelka et al. (2006)
(See Table 4.1 for details of the modifications made to the original protocol). Dry cowpea seed
(30 g) was weighed into a 250 mL Schott bottle and sterilized by adding approximately 50 mL of
70 % ethanol for 1 min. The bottle was then shaken vigorously for 30 s and the ethanol poured
off. A volume of 50 mL of 20 % commercial bleach was added and allowed to stand for 30 min
at room temperature. The seeds were rinsed 5 times in sterile reverse osmosis (RO) purified
water and seeds were allowed to imbibe in 50 mL of sterile RO water overnight.
The excess water was poured from the imbibed seed and the seed coat removed aseptically.
The seed was split in two by separating the cotyledons. Using the cotyledon with the attached
embryonic axis, the lower ⅔ of the radicle was excised. This is referred to as the explant.
Approximately 50 explants were placed in sterile 250 mL flasks containing 10 mL of cowpea
suspension liquid medium containing no L‐cysteine. For one experiment, 400 explants were
placed in eight flasks.
The cowpea suspension liquid medium was poured off the explants. Approximately 25 mL of
the re‐suspended Agrobacterium culture was added to submerge the 50 explants. The explants
were sonicated for 30 s and incubated for a minimum of 1 h on a rotary shaker at 28 ºC and
200 rpm. The Agrobacterium culture was poured off and discarded and the explants placed
67
Table 4.1: Modifications of the transformation system used for cowpea
Transformation protocol according
to Popelka et al. (2006)
Modifications made in the
current study
Seed sterilization ‐ Dry seed sterilized for 45 minutes
in 50 % bleach.
‐ Dry seed sterilized in 70 %
ethanol for 1 minute, followed by
20 % commercial bleach for 30
minutes.
Agro‐infection stage ‐ Wounded the explants using a
scalpel blade.
‐ Explants sonicated for 30 s while
submerged in Agro infection
culture.
Co‐cultivation stage ‐ Infected explants co‐cultured for
6 days.
‐ Incorporated 1 g/L of L‐cysteine in
the co‐cultivation media.
‐ Infected explants co‐cultured for
3 days.
‐ Absence of L‐cysteine in co‐
cultivation media.
Shoot induction stage ‐ Incorporated 250 mg/L sodium
thiosulfate in the shoot induction
medium.
‐ Absence of sodium thiosulphate
in the shoot induction medium.
Selection Conditions ‐ Explants on shoot induction
medium without selection for 12
days i.e. Days 4 – 16 (Table 4.2).
‐ The explants were then
transferred to selection media
(phosphinothricin) at a constant
level for the next eight sub‐cultures
including rooting stage.
‐ Explants were immediately
transferred to selection
(kanamycin at 100 mg/L) on
shoot induction medium for days
4 – 16 (Table 4.2).
‐ The explants were then
transferred to a higher level of
selection (150 mg/L kanamycin)
for days 17 – 44 (Table 4.2).
‐ The selection agent was then
changed to geneticin at 30 mg/L
for the remaining cycles including
rooting i.e days 45 – 129 (Table
4.2).
68
onto new sterile filter papers to blot the excess culture medium. Co‐cultivation plates were
prepared by placing sterile filter paper on solid cowpea suspension medium. The blotted
explants were placed on the filter paper plates and co‐cultivated for 3 days (fourth
modification) at 28 ºC, 16/8 h (light/dark).
4.2.2.3 Regeneration and maintenance of cowpea cultures
Following co‐cultivation, the explants were placed with the growing shoot facing down onto
solidified shoot induction medium containing kanamycin (100 mg/L) for selection and
meropenem (Merrem) (25 mg/L) to prevent the growth of Agrobacterium (section 2.12.4). This
medium contained no sodium thiosulphate. The cultures were incubated for 12 to 14 days in a
growth chamber at 28 ºC, 16/8 h light/dark regime. In the second transfer, the cotyledons
were excised and discarded and the remaining portion of the explants transferred to solidified
shoot induction medium with kanamycin (150 mg/L) and Merrem for 12 to 14 days. At the
third transfer, the primary shoots were excised and the excess or brown callus trimmed off and
remaining callus was again placed onto solidified shoot induction medium with kanamycin (150
mg/L) selection and Merrem. The callus was subsequently trimmed off followed by a fourth
transfer. At the fifth transfer, any multiple shoots were transferred to shoot induction medium
with more stringent selection using geneticin (30 mg/L) and Merrem otherwise a further cycle
with kanamycin (150 mg/L) was repeated. Following this, one more cycle of transfer onto
shoot induction medium with 30 mg/L geneticin was carried out. Large clumps consisting of
many shoots were separated into smaller clumps or as singles depending on the vigour and the
callus was trimmed. By the seventh transfer, multiple shoots were separated and at the eighth
transfer, single shoots were placed onto shoot elongation medium with geneticin (30 mg/L)
and Merrem for elongation and rooting (section 2.12.5). Depending on their height, shoots
were either placed in Petri plates or 250 mL pots. The shoots that developed healthy roots
(plantlets) were transferred into small pots (50 cm diameter x 10 cm height) containing a light
sandy soil mix (25 % perlite, 25 % vermiculite, 30 % river sand and 20 % commercial potting
mix), and subsequently maintained in the culture room for up to 4 weeks to establish a healthy
root system and acclimatize prior to transfer to the greenhouse. During this stage the putative
transgenics were screened by PCR (see 4.2.3) after which positive plants were transferred to
soil (70 % commercial potting mix, 10 % perlite, 10 % river sand, 10 % peat, 1.5 g/L Osmocote,
69
0.5 g/L Nitram and 3 g/L Carb lime) in 20 cm pots in the glasshouse. A brief summary of the
steps in the transformation and regeneration of cowpea is outlined in Table 4.2.
Table 4.2: Outline of steps in cowpea transformation with the plant‐optimized vip3Ba gene
Step Procedure Time required
1 Dry seed sterilization 1 h
2 Seed imbibitions Overnight
3 Explant preparation 400 explants in 3 h
4 Sonication of explants in presence of Agrobacterium 30 s
5 Infection with Agrobacterium 1 h
6 Co‐cultivation with Agrobacterium Days 1 – 3
7 First round of shoot induction (in presence of cotyledons) Days 4 – 16
8 Cotyledon excision Day 17
9 Second round of shoot induction Days 17 – 28
10 Third round of shoot induction Days 29 – 44
11 Fourth round of shoot induction Days 45 – 55
12 Fifth round of shoot induction Days 56 ‐ 69
13 Sixth round of shoot induction Days 70 ‐ 84
14 Seventh round of shoot induction Days 85 ‐ 99
15 First round of shoot elongation and rooting Days 100 ‐ 114
16 Second round of shoot elongation and rooting Days 115 ‐ 129
16 Acclimatization of rooted plantlets in sandy soil mix Days 130 ‐ 145
17 Transfer of established plants to soil in greenhouse Days 115 ‐ 145
4.2.3 Detection of vip3Ba and nptII genes in the transgenic plants
To test for the presence of the transgenes (vip3Ba and nptII) in putatively transgenic cowpea
plants, genomic DNA was extracted using the lysis method described in section 2.13.
Approximately 100 ng of genomic DNA was used as a template for a PCR as previously
described in section 2.14 using the primers described in Table 4.3. Water and/or DNA from the
70
non‐transformed cowpea line IT86D was used as a negative control while plasmid DNA with
vip3Ba and nptII genes was used as a positive control. The PCR products were resolved by
electrophoresis through 1.8 % agarose gels and made visible with a transilluminator gel
documentation system (GelDoc 2000 software, BioRad).
Table 4.3: Primer sequences for the detection of nptII and vip3Ba genes in transgenic plants
Primer name Primer sequence Product size
nptII F: GCTTGGGTGGAGAGGCTATTR: TCATTTCGAACCCCAGAGTC
970 bp
Vip3Ba_set1 F: GAACGCTCAGCTCAACTCCA R: GGTGGAGTTGATGAGCACGT
187 bp
4.2.4 Detection and estimation of Vip3Ba expression in transgenic plants
Seeds from the T0 transgenic lines were harvested and sown to obtain T1 plants for DNA and
protein isolation. Young fully expanded leaves of T1 plants (7‐days old) were harvested for PCR
and expression of Vip3Ba protein was detected using western blot analysis following the
procedures described in section 2.16. The amount of Vip3Ba protein was estimated based on a
standard curve derived using protein standards from E. coli expressing Vip3Ba protein at 1 ng,
3 ng, 10 ng and 30 ng per lane. The data were expressed as ng Vip3Ba per mg of total soluble
protein.
4.2.5 Insect bioassays using transgenic leaf material
Leaves of transgenic cowpea lines expressing Vip3Ba were fed to Maruca larvae. Bt cowpea
line 709A expressing Cry1Ab previously developed at CSIRO (Higgins et al., 2012) was used as a
positive control while the non‐transgenic parent line IT86D was used as a negative control.
Feeding trays consisted of 32 wells (1 cm diameter x 1 cm height). For each line, sixteen wells
were partially filled with 5 mL of 1 % water agar containing 0.1 % (w/v) sorbic acid to avoid
fungal contamination (Acharjee et al., 2010). Approximately 20 mg of fresh leaf material was
placed on the agar in each well.
One 6‐day old larva (2.2 ± 0.1 mg) was introduced onto each leaf and the trays sealed with a
perforated film using a hot sealer. The assays were done in a climate chamber at 26 ºC and 50
71
% relative humidity. Surviving larvae were re‐fed with fresh leaf every other day. After 10 days,
the bioassay results were scored; mortality and final weights of surviving larvae were recorded.
Three separate bioassay experiments were conducted for each cowpea line, resulting in a
minimum number of replications of 48 per treatment.
4.3 Results
4.3.1 Reconstruction of the vip3Ba gene for cowpea transformation
Prior to transformation into cowpea, the coding region of the vip3Ba gene was optimized for
plant expression by increasing the GC content from approximately 30 % to 50 %, and deleting
the eight potential polyadenylation sites and twelve mRNA destabilizing sequence motifs that
were present. The codons were also optimized to enhance translation in dicots. These changes
are summarized in Table 4.4.
The reconstructed vip3Ba gene (the full DNA sequence of the open reading frame is shown in
Appendix II and its sequence comparison with the bacterial vip3Ba gene in Appendix III) was
cloned into the binary vector, pART27, and electroporated into A. tumefaciens AGL1 (Fig. 4.1
and 4.2). To confirm the presence of the construct in A. tumefaciens, plasmid DNA was
extracted from bacterial cultures and digested with EcoRV and PvuII. Four fragments of the
expected sizes (1.5, 2.7, 4.4, 6.4 kb) were observed confirming the presence of the construct
(Fig. 4.3).
72
Table 4.4: A comparison of the vip3Ba gene from Bt with the version optimized for expression in plants
Parameter Original vip3Ba
Optimized vip3Ba
G+C content 29.8% 50.5% PolyA sites (AATAAA and/or AATAAT) 8 0 RNA destabilizing sequences (ATTTA) 12 0 Examples of codon usage change
‐ Isoleucine ATT ATC ‐ Leucine TTA CTC ‐ Proline CCA CCT ‐ Arginine AGA/CGT CGA ‐ Valine GTA GTT/GTC ‐ Tyrosine TAT TAC
Fig. 4.1: Schematic diagram of the Agrobacterium binary vector T‐DNA; LB, RB: left and right borders of Agrobacterium T‐DNA, respectively. The antibiotic selection gene neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) from E. coli was flanked by the S1 promoter derived from segment 1 of the subterranean clover stunt virus (SCSV) genome and segment 3 (S3) 3′ end while the optimized coding region of the vip3Ba gene was flanked by the Arabidopsis thaliana small subunit (AraSSU) promoter and Nicotiana tabacum small subunit (TobSSU) 3′ end.
73
Fig. 4.2: Plasmid map showing unique restriction sites in the pVip3Ba construct used in the
transformation of cowpea
74
Fig. 4.3: Confirmation of the Vip3Ba cassette in the Agrobacterium binary vector by restriction digestion. Lane M: DNA Molecular ladder; Lanes 1 and 2: Agrobacterium DNA digested with the enzymes EcoRV and PvuII resulting in the expected four fragments of 1.5, 2.7, 4.4 and 6.4 kb, respectively.
75
4.3.2 Transformation and regeneration of cowpea with the optimized vip3Ba gene
Sterilized dry cowpea seed was imbibed with water and explants were prepared for
transformation by excising approximately ⅔ of the radicle from the cotyledon containing the
embryonic axis (Fig. 4.4 A). The explants were subsequently co‐cultivated with Agrobacterium
containing the optimized vip3Ba gene for 3 days (Fig. 4.4 B) before being incubated on
selection media (Fig. 4.5 A) for a maximum of 14 days. The cotyledons and primary shoots were
subsequently excised (see 4.2.2.3) (Fig. 4.5 B) to obtain callus. Subsequent cycles of transfer of
calli to fresh shoot induction medium led to the formation of multiple shoots (Fig. 4.5 C) which
were separated to obtain single shoots (Fig. 4.5 D, E) which further developed into rooted
plantlets (Fig. 4.5 F) that were first acclimatized prior to transfer to the glasshouse (Fig. 4.5 G).
76
Fig. 4.4: Cowpea explants used for transformation. (A) Cotyledons with attached axes that had their radicle tips removed (arrows) ready for infection with Agrobacterium and (B) after co‐cultivation with Agrobacterium for 3 days.
77
Fig. 4.5: In vitro regeneration of cowpea following co‐cultivation with Agrobacterium. (A) Cowpea explant with cotyledon and primary shoots on shoot induction medium with selection at 2 weeks (B) trimmed explant with cotyledon and primary shoot removed at 4 weeks (C) multiple shoots formed on callus (D) single shoots formed on shoot induction medium with 30 mg/L geneticin at 8 weeks (E) shoots grown on medium with 30 mg/L geneticin at 10 weeks, (F) individual shoots in elongation and rooting medium at 14 weeks and (G) rooted plants in the soil at 16 weeks.
78
4.3.3 Characterization of transgenic lines by PCR
A total of 6696 explants were co‐cultivated with Agrobacterium containing the vip3Ba
binary vector. Following selection, 77 putative independent transgenic lines were obtained,
with all plants that regenerated from one explant considered as clones (siblings) belonging
to one transgenic event. To assay for the presence of the transgene in these lines, genomic
DNA was extracted and used as a template in PCR using primers designed to amplify a 970
bp region of the nptII gene and a 187 bp fragment of the vip3Ba gene (Fig. 4.6). Of the 77
plants, 73 were positive for both the vip3Ba and nptII genes (Table 4.5), resulting in an
average transformation frequency of 1.1 %. While the copy number of inserts was not
determined, transgenic lines with a single locus were selected based on segregation
analysis. Lines V24, V25, V43 and V87 showed Mendelian inheritance of the vip3Ba gene
with a segregation ratio of 3:1 following a Chi square analysis (Table 4.6).
4.3.4 Expression of Vip3Ba in T1 generation
All the 73 T0 plants were fertile and seed from 42 lines was collected for further work. A
minimum of 8 seeds from each of the 42 T0 lines were germinated to produce T1 plants. The
non‐transgenic parent line (IT86D) was propagated as a negative control. Total soluble
protein (TSP) was extracted from leaf samples from a pool of 6‐8 T1 plants generated from
each of the 42 transgenic lines. A 40 µg aliquot of TSP was then subjected to SDS‐PAGE,
blotted to membranes and analysed for expression of Vip3Ba by western blot using a
Vip3Ba‐specific monoclonal antibody. Of the 6‐8 T1 plants derived from each of the 42 T0
lines that were analysed, a band of the expected size for Vip3Ba ( ̴75 kDa) was detected in
extracts from 9 of the 42 lines (ie, lines V9, V24, V25, V43, V56, V87, V107, V176 and V191)
(Table 4.5). An additional, non‐specific band of 2̴2 kDa was also observed in protein extracts
from all cowpea lines including the non‐tranformed negative control. A representative blot
of TSP extracts from T1 progeny derived from lines V9, V24, V25, V43, V56, V87 and V107
showing average expression in these lines is displayed in Fig. 4.7. The concentration of
Vip3Ba protein in the extracts was estimated by visual comparison with known levels (1 ng,
3 ng, 10 ng, 30 ng and 100 ng) of E. coli‐expressed Vip3Ba protein. The limit of detection of
Vip3Ba protein was found to be 1.5 ng, which is equivalent to 37.5 ng/mg TSP (data not
79
shown). Based on this, the levels of Vip3Ba protein expression in the 7 lines ranged between
0.25 and 5.0 µg/mg TSP (Table 4.7).
Fig. 4.6: PCR analysis of 10 putative transgenic cowpea lines using (A) vip3Ba‐specific primers designed to amplify a 187 bp product and (B) nptII‐specific primers designed to amplify a 970 bp product. Lane M: DNA Molecular marker; Lane N: water (negative control); Lane P: Plasmid DNA of the optimized gene construct (positive control); numbers above other lanes represent the line number of randomly selected transgenic cowpeas used for PCR analysis.
80
Table 4.5: Summary of the molecular analysis of transgenic cowpea lines
No. of primary transgenics
No. of lines PCR positive for nptII
No. of lines PCR positive for vip3Ba
No. of lines tested by western blots
No. of lines with detectable levels of Vip3Ba protein
77
73
73
42
9
Table 4.6: Segregation analysis of transgenic cowpea T1 plants
Vip3Ba lines
No. of
plants
tested
Positive
(vip3Ba)
Negative
(vip3Ba) Ratio X2
V24 13 10 3 3.3:1 1.83
V25 8 7 1 7:1 0.11
V43 25 16 9 1.8:1 1.61
V87 36 26 10 2.6:1 0.147
81
T1 progeny from four lines, namely V24‐9, V25‐8, V43‐3 and V87‐2, were selected for further
analysis. The selection was based on the fact that variation in Vip3Ba expression between
the four lines could serve to determine whether insect mortality was dependent on toxin
dosage. The selected T1 plants were grown on to produce T2 seed, and at least five T2 plants
from each of these four lines were further subjected to Western blot analysis. Figure 4.8
shows blots of extracts from progeny of lines V25, V24, V43 and V87, indicating expression
in the segregating progeny of the four selected lines.
In the four selected T1 transgenic lines (V24, V25, V43 and V87), plants expressing Vip3Ba
showed abnormal phenotype. The phenotype was characterized by stunted growth (lines 24
and 43), deformed and or wrinkled leaves (lines 43 and 87). The non‐transformed parent
line IT86D and the null segregants appeared phenotypically normal (Fig. 4.9).
82
Fig. 4.7: Western blots using a monoclonal antibody to Vip3Ba showing the levels of Vip3Ba in seven cowpea lines using varying levels of
Vip3Ba expressed in E. coli as standards. In both blots, Lane M is the protein molecular weight ladder. Lanes L1 to L5 represent E. coli
expressed Vip3Ba loaded at 100, 50, 25, 12.5 and 6.25 ng per lane, respectively. Blot A includes protein (40µg/lane) from cowpea lines 9, 24,
25 and 43 while Blot B includes protein (40µg/lane) from lines 56, 87 and 107.
83
Table 4.7: Levels of Vip3Ba toxin in the T1 progeny of seven cowpea lines.
Line Level (in ng) of Vip3Ba toxin in 40 ug TSP Vip 3Ba (µg/mg TSP)
V9 50 1.25 V24 50 1.25 V25 50 1.25 V43 75 1.9 V56 10 0.25 V87 200 5.0 V107 25 0.63
84
Fig. 4.8: Western blot analysis to determine Vip3Ba expression in transgenic cowpea lines using a monoclonal antibody to Vip3Ba. Blot A: Line V24: Lane M: Protein precision markers; Lanes 1 to 6: TSP (40 µg) extract from six T2 plants; Lanes 7 to 9: 30 ng, 100 ng and 300 ng protein from E. coli expressing Vip3Ba protein (positive control). Blot B: Line V25: Lanes 1 to 8: TSP (40 µg) extract from eight T1 plants; Lanes 9 to 10: 10 ng and 30 ng protein from E. coli expressing Vip3Ba protein (positive control). Blot C: Line V43: Lane M: Protein precision markers; Lanes 1 to 6: TSP (40 µg) from six T2 plants; Lanes 7 to 9: 30 ng, 100 ng and 300 ng protein from E. coli expressing Vip3Ba protein (positive control). Blot D: Line V87: Lane M: Protein precision markers; Lanes 1 to 5: TSP (40 µg) from five T2 plants; Lanes 6 to 9: 10 ng, 30 ng, 100 ng and 300 ng Vip protein from E. coli expressing Vip3Ba protein (positive control). Vip3Ba band migrates at ~75 kDa.
85
Fig. 4.9: Phenotypes of selected transgenic T1 cowpea lines expressing Vip3Ba protein at different ages. (A) Line V24 at 3 weeks after sowing; (B) Line V25 at 2 weeks after sowing; (C) Line V43 at 2 ½ months after sowing; (D) Line V87 at 3 weeks after sowing and; (E) 3‐week old negative segregants of lines V43 and V87.
86
4.3.5 Efficacy of transgenic lines expressing Vip3Ba protein on MPB larvae
To test the effect of the selected transgenic lines expressing the Vip3Ba toxin on the
mortality of MPB larvae, a replicated series of bioassays was carried out. Sixteen replicate
leaf samples from each of the four selected Vip3Ba‐expressing cowpea lines were fed to
MPB larvae and the effect of the toxins was investigated over a 10‐day period by measuring
MPB mortality and the weight of any surviving larvae. As controls, samples were also taken
from leaves of the positive control Cry1Ab‐line (709A) and from the non‐transgenic negative
control line (IT86D).
The average weight of larvae fed on leaf samples from IT86D ranged between 23 and 26 mg
after 10 days’ growth and no mortality was observed. Most of the larvae fed on IT86D
leaves had progressed to the fifth and final instar stage. When larvae were fed on leaves
from the positive control line 709A expressing Cry1Ab, the mortality was 100 % as expected.
There was also 100 % mortality of larvae feeding on leaves of all four lines expressing
Vip3Ba protein (Table 4.9). Leaf damage on the Vip3Ba‐transgenic lines, as well as the
positive control, was negligible with most of the leaf discs left fully intact (Fig. 4.9 A‐E). In
contrast, leaf damage on line IT86D was severe with abundant frass observed on the leaf
disks indicating that the insects feeding on these plants were developing normally (Fig 4.9 F‐
H).
87
Table 4.8: Mortality of Maruca larvae feeding on transgenic cowpea leaves in four separate and replicated bioassays (N = 16 larvae per replication).
Linea
Level of toxin (ng/mg TSP)
Mortality of Maruca larvae (%)
1st Bioassay 2nd Bioassay 3rd Bioassay 4th Bioassay
IT86D 0 0 0 0 0709A 260 100 100 100 100 V24 425 100 100 100 100V25 155 100 100 100 100 V43 895 100 100 100 100 V87 365 100 100 100 100
a Lines V24 to V87 are four independent transgenic lines expressing Vip3Ba protein between 155 and 895 ng/mg TSP, respectively. Line IT86D is the untransformed parent line (i.e. the negative control). Line 709A is a cowpea line transformed with the cry1Ab gene (positive control).
88
Fig. 4.10: Leaf damage after 10 days of feeding by Maruca larvae on non‐transgenic line IT86D and transgenic lines expressing Cry 1Ab or Vip3Ba protein. A: Line 709A (expressing Cry 1Ab), B: Line V24, C: Line V25, D: Line V43, E: Line V87, F, G, H: Line IT86D
89
4.4. Discussion
Cowpea production worldwide is constrained by several insect pests, however, the Maruca
pod borer (MPB) is considered one of the most devastating. The absence of genes for
resistance to Maruca in cowpea germplasm has precluded the use of conventional plant
breeding as a means to control this pest (Fatokun, 2002). As such, genetic engineering
appears to be the most viable control option. The aim of this chapter, therefore, was to
generate transgenic cowpeas expressing Vip3Ba and determine whether they were in fact
resistant to MPB.
In general, insecticidal proteins need to be expressed at relatively high levels in their plant
hosts in order to effectively control the insect target (Gatehouse, 2008). One limitation of
using native Bt genes is that they are expressed poorly in higher eukaryotes (Schuler et al.
1998; Perlak et al. 2001). This is most likely due to the fact these bacterial genes are AT‐rich
and contain polyadenylation signals and mRNA destabilizing sequence motifs;
charactersitics that can negatively affect mRNA processing in plants (Estruch et al., 1997;
Jouanin et al., 1998). In order to maximise vip3Ba gene expression in transgenic cowpea, the
coding sequence of the bacterial‐derived vip3Ba gene was modified using the strategy
described by Perlak et al. (1991). This involved increasing the GC content of the coding
sequence and deleting the polyadenylation and mRNA destabilizing sequences without
altering the amino acid sequence. Also, the codon usage was optimized to enhance
translation in dicotyledons by using plant‐preferred codons. Using a similar strategy, high
level expression of optimized cry1Ac, cry1Ab and cry1C genes have been reported for
engineered resistance to lepidopteran insect pests in transgenic cotton, tomato and
tobacco, respectively (Perlak et al., 1990; Perlak et al., 1991; van der Salm et al., 1994).
In order to generate cowpea lines expressing the optimised vip3Ba gene, a reliable
transformation and regeneration system for cowpea had to be first established in house. It
is well documented that transformation of many plant species is dependent on the
genotype, the type of explant used, the antibiotic or herbicide selection regime and plant
growth media composition (Manman et al., 2013). In this study, significant modifications
were made to a published cowpea transformation protocol (Popelka et al., 2006) to improve
its efficiency. These modifications included using a growth media in the absence of certain
90
key plant hormones, a different antibiotic selection regime, and employing sonication to
permeate the plant cell wall and thereby facilitate Agrobacterium‐mediated T‐DNA transfer
into the host plant cell. These technical changes resulted in a cowpea transformation system
with an efficiency of just over 1 %, with 73 independent transgenic lines obtained. This rate
is comparable to other cowpea transformation studies which ranged from 0.15 % to 3.9 %
(Chaudhury et al., 2007; Ivo et al., 2008; Raveendar and Ignacimuthu, 2010; Solleti et al.,
2008; Popelka et al., 2006; Behura et al., 2015; Adesoye et al., 2010).
Independent lines were assayed for the presence of the transgene in T0. The progeny of nine
lines were assayed for Vip protein in the T1 generation by western blot. It is highly likely that
the 9 lines were independently transformed as we expect that there was random
integration of the transgene in the genome. Consequently, protein expression is expected to
be dependent on the locus where the transgene has integrated, either in a transcriptionally
active or inactive locus (Chen et al., 1998; Kohli et al., 2010). Consequently, further analysis
to determine the transgene loci for these lines is therefore recommended.
The levels of Vip3Ba protein were measured in a number of transgenic cowpea lines using
western blots. The amount of Vip3Ba varied and ranged between 155 ng/mg TSP and 895
ng/mg TSP. Variable transgene expression is a common phenomenon in genetically modified
plants and levels can vary widely between independent transgenic lines (Matzke & Matzke,
1998; Schuler et al., 1998). This variation is primarily the result of (i) the position effect i.e.
where in the genome the transgene cassette has integrated, and (ii) complex integration
events which can trigger post transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) and/or transcriptional
gene silencing (TGS) (Matzke & Matzke, 1998; Schuler et al., 1998; Stam et al., 1997). The
latter of these phenomena are of particular importance as both PTGS and TGS can result in
the complete shutdown of a transgene’s expression.
The levels of Vip3Ba measured in this study are within the range of those observed in
cowpea lines expressing Cry 1Ab (av. 260 ng/mg TSP), but higher than those reported in
chickpea expressing Cry 1Ac (0.5 to 23.5 ng/mg TSP) (Kar et al., 1997; Sanyal et al., 2005;
Indurker et al., 2010; Mehrotra et al., 2011; Ganguly et al., 2014). In contrast, very high
levels of Bt toxin expression have been reported in other transgenic crops. In these cases,
the Bt toxin gene product was targeted to the chloroplast using a plastid transit peptide
91
fused to its N‐terminus. Using this strategy, Cry1Ac accumulated up to 6000 ng/mg TSP in
transgenic soybean (Miklos et al., 2007) and Vip3A levels reached between (5950 to 6120
ng/mg TSP) in transgenic cotton (Wu et al., 2011). It is likely intracellular targeting of these
proteins acts to stabilise and protect the product from degradation by cytosolic proteases or
protein turn‐over resulting in abundant accumulation of the target protein.
Four lines expressing different levels of Vip3Ba (ranging from 155 to 895 ng/mg TSP) were
selected for insect bioassays. These lines were selected in order to study a toxin dose
response i.e. the optimal level of toxicity at which insect mortality occurs. Despite varied
levels of Vip3Ba between plants, 100 % mortality rates of Maruca vitrata larvae were
observed in feeding trials with all transgenic lines tested. This would suggest Vip3Ba levels
lower than 155 ng/mg TSP are sufficient to cause Maruca larvae death, and that this toxic
product is highly effective at low doses.
A high toxin dose is preferred for robust insect resistance in transgenic crops carrying a
single Bt toxin gene (Gryspeirt and Gregoire, 2012). However, over‐expression of the vip3Ba
gene alone caused abornmal phenotypes in transgenic cowpea, including stunting,
deformed and/or wrinkled leaves, chlorosis, and the development of fewer flowers and
pods. This effect positively correlated with the level of Vip3Ba gene expression as high
expressing lines exhibited more severe phenotypic effects compared to low‐expressing lines
which showed little to none. This suggests high levels of Vip3Ba accumulation may be
phytotoxic in cowpea. Such a phenomenon was also observed in chickpea over‐expressing
the cry2Aa genes (Acharjee et al., 2010) which displayed stunting, abnormal root
development, and abnormal flower and leaf formation (Deineko et al., 2007; Acharjee et al.,
2010). Considering this, it would be of benefit to screen other cowpea lines expressing levels
of Vip3Ba that are lower than 150 ng/mg TSP in insect bioassays in order to determine the
minimal toxin dose required for MPB protection while producing plants with a fully normal
phenotype. Other than leaf infestation, Maruca larvae mostly feed on the floral parts in
cowpea. Further research on testing for protein expression in the flowers should therefore
be considered.
92
A Cry1Ab‐transgenic cowpea line has previously been developed with resistance to MPB in
the field (Higgins et al., 2012). However, it has been shown that some insect pests can build
up a tolerance to a single Bt toxin over time (Liu et al., 2010) and it is likely MPB will do the
same. It has been suggested that the best strategy to overcome this is to pyramid Bt genes
such that a second toxin gene is also expressed in the plant, but at lower titre (Gryspeirt and
Gregoire, 2012). This study has proven the Vip3Ba is a lethal control agent against MPB and
is active at relatively low concentrations. Together, this would suggest vip3Ba is an
attractive gene candidate for stacked resistance to MPB in cry1Ab‐transgenic cowpea. If a
phenotypically normal, low Vip3Ba‐expressing cowpea line with robust resistance to MPB
can be identified from the pool of cowpea lines developed in this study, it may be useful for
traditional backcrossing into cry1Ab‐containing cowpea cultivar for IRM. If such a line
cannot be found then new ways of regulating Vip3Ba expression and minimising unwanted
phenotypical changes now need to be explored, for example using a weaker promoter to
provide low‐level constitutive expression of Vip3Ba or targeting the protein to the
chloroplast.
93
CHAPTER FIVE
General Discussion and Conclusions
Grain legumes play a significant role in contributing to the livelihoods of farmers in Africa.
They provide human nutrition and generate income through sale of surplus grain. These
legumes improve soil fertility thereby leading to sustainable soil productivity (Odendo et al.,
2011). In sub‐Saharan Africa, legumes integrate with cereals and livestock thus contributing
to food security (Odendo et al., 2011). Cowpea is one such grain legume that is important in
the diets of people living in sub‐Saharan Africa. It has a high protein and mineral content in
the grains and leaves and it is cultivated for both human consumption and as an animal
feed.
One of the most serious problems affecting cowpea production is damage caused by the
lepidopteran pest, Maruca pod borer (MPB). This insect attacks the pods and leaves of this
crop, is a major insect pest of other grain legumes and is responsible for substantial yield
losses in cowpea (Suh and Simbi, 1983). The current approaches used to control this pest
have mainly focussed on the use of chemical sprays. However, spraying can be harmful to
the environment and human health, and is also costly. Although conventional plant
breeding has been used to successfully control some pests and diseases affecting cowpea
(Huynh et al., 2015), the lack of resistance to MPB in the primary genepool as well as the
sexual incompatibility of cowpea with its wild relatives precludes the use of this approach
for controlling MPB. Therefore, an alternative strategy is needed to control this pest in
cowpea.
Genetic engineering offers such a solution and there are numerous examples of the
generation of insect‐resistant crops expressing Bt endotoxin genes (Ishida et al., 2007;
Acharjee et al., 2010). Although a Bt‐encoded cry 1Ab gene has been transformed into
cowpea (Higgins et al., 2012) and shown to confer resistance to MPB in the field
(Mohammed et al., 2014), there is a likelihood that this pest could eventually evolve
resistance to a single Cry protein. As such, this project sought to develop transgenic
cowpeas with resistance to MPB using a Bt‐encoded vip as transgene. The vip3 gene
products were considered excellent targets as they are toxic to a number of lepidopteran
94
pests (Estruch et al., 1996). Further, the toxins expressed by the vip and cry genes have
different target sites in the insect midgut (Lee et al., 2003), thereby presenting a way of
delaying resistance to one type of Bt protein.
Bt genes are abundant in nature and a large group of sequences are deposited in the Bt
database (Crickmore et al., 2014). Their nomenclature is based on DNA sequence
similarities. In this study, in order to target the diversity of the 3 groups (A, B and C) of vip
genes for screening, the genes were subjected to further phylogenetic analyses based on
the amino acid sequences of the proteins they encode. As a result, five groups of vip genes
were identified and a representative gene selected from each group. When a collection of
Australian Bt isolates were screened for these target sequences, four of the five vip3 genes
were found to be present. Primers were subsequently designed to amplify the coding
sequences to enable the target proteins to be expressed in E. coli and to assess their toxicity
to MPB in feeding trials. Only three of the target sequences were able to be amplified from
the Bt collection, so the remaining two target genes were chemically synthesized prior to
their cloning. Expression of all five genes in E. coli resulted in in high levels of protein as
expected (Frommer and Ninnemann, 1995). Bioassays were carried out with MPB larvae
using different concentrations of each of the Vips incorporated into an artificial diet.
Artificial diets are commonly used to test for insecticidal activity of Bt toxins against insect
pests (Estruch et al., 1996; Beard et al., 2008). The bioassays revealed that one of the five
Vip3 proteins tested (Vip3Ba) inhibited the growth of MPB larvae. The was a significant
outcome and was the first to report on the toxicity of Vip proteins to this particular pest.
Based on this result, VipBa was chosen as the candidate gene to express in transgenic
cowpea.
Cowpea is generally recalcitrant to transformation and regeneration and a considerable
effort has been directed towards improving the low transformation frequencies and
regeneration efficiencies reported earlier. For example, different regeneration pathways
have been examined such as the establishment of callus and direct or indirect
organogenesis (via somatic embryogenesis) through cell suspension cultures or on agar‐
solidified media. Attempts to increase the efficiency of both transformation and
regeneration have also included the use of different types of explants (leaf discs,
cotyledonary nodes, embryonic axes), subjecting explants to several selection methods and
95
optimizing culture conditions, but ultimately, the regeneration potential is dependent on
the genotype (Somers et al., 2003; Citadin et al., 2011; Atif et al., 2013). With this in mind, a
considerable effort was made in the current study to modify an existing transformation and
regeneration protocol (Popelka et al., 2006). These modifications included transforming
many (about 400) explants simultaneously in one experiment and using a sonication
procedure to aid in the transfer of the transgene into the plant cell. Sonication was used to
disrupt the cell wall of many explants concurrently thus facilitating Agrobacterium‐mediated
transformation. The protocol used here yielded a transformation efficiency that was close to
8‐fold higher than that reported by Popelka et al. (2006).
To enhance expression of a bacterial gene in a plant host, modifications are made without
altering the sequence of the encoded protein. Perlak et al. (1991) were the first to use this
approach to greatly enhance the expression levels of insecticidal proteins in tobacco.
Accordingly, in order to maximise the expression of Vip3Ba in transgenic cowpea, the vip3B
gene was also modified prior to Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation. The Arabidopsis
small subunit (AraSSU) promoter and Nicotiana tabacum small subunit (TobSSU) terminator
were selected to direct expression of the vip3Ba gene in planta. The AraSSU promoter has
been used by other researchers to express Bt insecticidal proteins (Acharjee et al., 2010)
and was preferred as it is strongly expressed in leaves and flowers and has been shown to
greatly enhance expression levels compared to other promoters such as CaMV 35S (Wong et
al., 1992; Tabe et al., 1995). Following Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation of 6696
cowpea explants with the vip3Ba‐expressing construct, 77 potential transgenic lines were
regenerated of which 73 were confirmed to be transgenic following molecular
characterization. Western blot analyses revealed that several lines expressed Vip3Ba protein
at varying levels ranging from 155 to 895 ng/mg total soluble protein. It was noted that
some lines exhibited abnormal phenotypes which generally correlated with higher levels of
toxin expression. Targeting protein expression to the chloroplast has been previously used
by researchers to overcome this problem. For example, chloroplast‐targeting of insecticidal
proteins in transgenic tobacco yielded normal phenotypes as compared to the non‐
organelle targeted controls which exhibited sterility (Corbin et al., 2001). In transgenic
cotton, chloroplast‐targeted Vip3A protein resulted in plants with normal agronomic traits
96
(Wu et al., 2011). Such an approach may therefore be needed in future studies with
cowpea.
Four transgenic cowpea lines were subsequently selected for insect bioassays to determine
the toxicity to MPB and all four lines were shown to be completely protected from MPB
damage. This was a significant and important outcome, and clearly demonstrated that
vip3Ba genes can be utilized in the development of cowpeas that are resistant to pod
borers. Importantly, this gene can be used to complement other Bt genes in tackling the
possibility of insect resistance development. Stacking cry1Ab and vip3Ba genes by
introgressing vip3Ba into cry 1Ab cowpea through back crossing will increase yields for the
small‐holder farmers in Africa and allow them to reduce the need for chemical sprays. The
pyramided Bt cowpea will reduce the likelihood of resistance developing in Maruca and thus
contribute to insect resistance management in cowpea.
Although the development of transgenic cowpea with resistance to MPB is now a reality,
the adoption of the technology is another issue that will need to be addressed. Since the
initial commercialization of biotech (GM) crops in 1996, there has been acceptance of the
technology in many but not all countries including developing nations (James, 2014). Most
African countries rely on agriculture as a source of income and livelihood, however the
sector is faced with many challenges. These include production constraints at farm level and
trade barriers to name but a few (Wafula and Guerre, 2013). Increasing population and
escalating food prices make it difficult to sustain food security at a household level.
Although GM technology has the potential to help address food security, the adoption of
agricultural biotechnology (GM crops) has been slower than expected in the African
continent (Chambers, 2013). The slow adoption of these crops and their products is
attributed to human and environmental safety concerns, ethics, and trade‐related aspects
of GM products (Chambers, 2013). Despite these issues, four African countries have been
actively involved in the commercialization of GM crops and are part of the 10 countries that
have fully functional National Biosafety Frameworks (NBFs) in place while many others
either have interim NBFs or are in the process of developing an NBF (Falck‐Zepeda, et al.,
2013).
97
The future direction of the current study is to screen for an elite line, which exhibits normal
phenotypic characteristics, and one that expresses levels of Vip3Ba protein that are less
than 100 ng/mg TSP but still confer 100 % mortality on Maruca. This line would
subsequently be tested for efficacy in insect bioassays. Should there be no such line, then a
construct that targets the expression of Vip3Ba protein to the chloroplast will be designed
and transformed into cowpea. Following bioassay studies with several independent
transgenic lines expressing Vip3Ba protein, a suitable candidate line will be selected for
further work. This work will involve the backcrossing of the elite line into the existing Bt
cowpea variety with the aim of developing a robust dual‐Bt toxin cowpea for long‐term
sustainability thereby enhancing its resilience against MPB resistance. Such a gene stack in a
farmer‐preferred variety will yield an improved cultivar for subsequent release under the
regulatory framework and adoption by smallholder farmers. This will offer a solution
towards the plight of farmers within the region who depend on cowpea as a staple food
crop.
98
CHAPTER SIX
References
Aasim, M., Khawar, K.M., Ozcan, S. (2010). Efficient in vitro propagation from
preconditioned embryonic axes of Turkish cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) cultivar
Akkiz. Archives of Biological Science, Belgrade, 62:1047‐1052.
Acharjee, S., Sarma, B.K., Kumar, P.A., Olsen, K., Mahon, R., Moar, W.J., Moore, A., Higgins,
T.J.V. (2010). Transgenic chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) expressing a sequence‐
modified cry2Aa gene. Plant Science, 178:333‐339.
Adamczyk Jr., J.J. and Mahaffey, J.S. (2008). Efficacy of Vip3A and Cry1Ab transgenic traits in
cotton against various lepidopteran pests. Florida Entomologist, 91:570‐575.
Adesoye, A., Machuka, J., Togun, A. (2008). CRY 1AB transgenic cowpea obtained by nodal
electroporation. African Journal of Biotechnology, 7:3200‐3210.
Adesoye, A.I., Togun, A.O., Machuka, J. (2010). Transformation of cowpea (Vigna
unguiculata L. Walp.) by Agrobacterium infiltration. Journal of applied Biosciences,
30:1845‐1860.
Ajeigbe, H.A. and Singh, B.B. (2006). Integrated pest management in cowpea: Effect on time
and frequency of insecticide application on productivity. Crop Protection, 25:920‐
925.
Akhurst, R.J., James, W., Bird, L.J., Beard, C. (2003). Resistance to the Cry1Ac δ‐endotoxin of
Bacillus thuringiensis in the Cotton Bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 96:1290‐1299.
Akobundu, I.O. (1982). Weed control in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) in the humid tropics.
Weed Science, 30:331‐334.
Aktories, K., Lang, A.E., Schwan, C., Mannherz, H.G. (2011). Actin as target for modification
by bacterial protein toxins. FEBS Journal, 278:4526‐4543.
99
Alvi, A.H.K., Sayyed, A.H., Naeem, M., Ali, M. (2012). Field evolved resistance in Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry1Ac in Pakistan.
PLoS ONE, 7:e47309.
Anand, R.P., Ganapathi A., Anbazhagan, R.R., Vengadesan, G., Selvaraj, N. (2000). High
frequency plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in cell suspension cultures
of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology‐
Plant, 36:475‐480.
Andberg, M., Jantti, J., Heilimo, S., Pihkala, P., Paananen, A., Koskinen, A.M.P., Soderlund,
H., Linder, M.B. (2007). Cleavage of recombinant proteins at poly‐His sequences by
Co(II) and Cu(II). Protein Science, 16:1751‐1761.
Andrea, A.C.D., Kahlheber, S., Logan, A.L., Watson, D.J. (2007). Early domesticated cowpea
(Vigna unguiculata) from Central Ghana. Antiquity, 81:686‐698.
Aragao, F.J.L and Campos, F.A.P. (2007). Common bean and cowpea: Transgenic crops IV. In
E.C. Taylor and M.R. Davey (Eds.), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, 59: 263‐
276.
Asssunção, I.P., Listik, A.F., Barros, M.C.S., Amorin, E.P.R., Silva, S.J.C., Izael, O.S., Ramalho‐
Neto, C.E., Lima, G.S.A. (2006). Genetic diversity of Begomovirus infecting weeds in
northeastern Brazil. Planta Daninha, 24:239‐244.
Atif, R.M., Patat‐Ochatt, E.M., Svabova, L., Ondrej, V., Klenoticova, H., Jacas, L., Griga, M.,
Ochatt, S.J. (2013). Gene transfer in legumes. In Progress in Botany. Springer Berlin
Heidelberg, pp.37‐100
Ba, N.M, Margam, V.M., Binso‐Dabire, C.L., Sanon, A., McNeil, J.N., Murdock, L.L.,
Pittendrigh, B.R. (2009). Seasonal and regional distribution of the cowpea pod borer
Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in Burkina Faso. International Journal of
Tropical Insect Science 29:109‐113.
Balachandra, B.A.H.E., Pathiratha, P.U., Paranagama, P.A. (2012). Control of stored grain
pest, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) using the essential oil
isolated from Plectranthus zeylanicus. Natural Product Research, 26:2219‐2222.
100
Bates, S.L., Zhao, J‐Z., Roush, R.T., Shelton, A.M. (2005). Insect resistance management in
GM crops: past, present and future. Nature Biotechnology, 23:57‐62.
Beard, C.E., Ranasinghe, C., Akhurst, R.J. (2001). Screening for novel cry genes by
hybridization. Letters of Applied Microbiology, 33:241‐245.
Beard, C.E., Court, L., Boets, A., Mourant, R., Van Rie, J., Akhurst, R.J. (2008). Unusually high
frequency of genes encoding vegetative insecticidal proteins in an Australian Bacillus
thuringiensis collection. Current Microbiology, 57:195‐199.
Behura, R., Kumar, S., Saha, B., Panda, M.K., Dey, M., Sadhukhan, A., Mishra, S., Alam, S.,
Sahoo, D.P., Sugla, T., Sahoo, L. (2015) Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] In:
Agrobacterium Protocols. Springer NewYork. pp.255‐264.
Bhalla, R., Dalal, M., Panguluri, S.K., Jagadish, B., Mandaokar, A.D., Singh, A.K., Kumar, P.A.
(2005). Isolation, characterization and expression of a novel vegetative insecticidal
protein gene of Bacillus thuringiensis. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 243:467‐472.
Bommireddy, P.L. and Leonard, B.R. (2008). Survivorship of Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis
virescens on cotton plant structures expressing a Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative
insecticidal protein. Journal of Economic Entomology, 101:1244‐1252.
Bondos, S.E and Bicknell, A. (2003). Detection and prevention of protein aggregation before,
during, and after purification. Analytical Biochemistry, 316:223‐231.
Boukar, O. and Fatokun, C. (2007). Strategies in cowpea breeding. In: New approaches to
plant breeding of orphan crops in Africa. Proceedings of an International Conference,
Bern, Switzerland, 19‐21 September 2007. pp 69‐92.
Boukar, O., Bhattacharjee, R., Fatokun, C., Kumar, P.L., Gueye, B. (2013). Cowpea. In: Mohar,
S., Upadhyaya, H.D., Bisht, I.S. (eds.). Genetic and genomic resources of grain legume
improvement. Elsevier. pp.137‐156.
Bradford, M.M. (1976). A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram
quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein‐dye‐binding. Analytical
Biochemistry, 72:248‐254.
101
Brar, M.S., Al‐Khayri, J.M., Morelock, T.E., Anderson, E.J. (1999). Genotypic response of
cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) to in vitro regeneration from cotyledon explants. In
Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology‐Plant, 35:8‐12.
Bravo, A., Soberon, M., Gill, S.S (2005). Bacillus thuringiensis: Mechanisms and Use.
Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, 6:175‐205.
Cao, J., Zhao, J‐Z., Tang, J.D., Shelton, A.M., Earle, E.D. (2002). Broccoli plants with
pyramided cry1Ac and cry1C Bt genes control diamondback moths resistant to Cry1A
and Cry1C proteins. Theoretical Applied Genetics, 105:258‐264.
Castagnola, A.S. and Jurat‐Fuentes, J.L. (2012). Bt Crops: Past and Future. In: Sansinenea, E.
(ed.). Bacillus thuringiensis Biotechnology. Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
pp 283‐304.
Ceroni, A., Passerini, A., Vullo, A. and Frasconi, P. (2006). DISULFIND: a Disulfide Bonding
State and Cysteine Connectivity Prediction Server. Nucleic Acids Research, 34 (Web
Server issue):W177‐‐W181.
Chakroun, M., Bel, Y., Caccia, S., Abdelkefi‐Mesrati, L., Escriche, B., Ferre, J. (2012).
Susceptibility of Spodoptera frugiperda and S. exigua to Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa
insecticidal protein. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 110:334‐339.
Chambers, J.A. (2013). Biosafety of GM Crops in Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania: An evolving
landscape of regulatory progress and retreat. A report of the Center for strategic and
international studies (CSIS) global food security project.
http://csis.org/files/publication/131127_Chambers_BiosafetyGMCrops_Web.pdf
Chattha, M.R., Jamil, M., Mahmood, T.Z. (2007). Yield and yield components of cowpea as
affected by various weed control methods under rain‐fed conditions of Pakistan.
International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 9:120‐124.
Chaudhury D., Madanpotra S., Jaiwal R., Saini R., Kumar P.A. and Jaiwal P.K. (2007).
Agrobacterium tumefaciens‐mediated high frequency genetic transformation of an
Indian cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) cultivar and transmission of transgenes
into progeny. Plant Science, 172:692‐700.
102
Chen, Y., Tian, J., Shen, Z., Peng, Y., Hu, C., Guo, Y., Ye, G. (2010). Transgenic rice plants
expressing a fused protein of Cry1Ab/Vip3H has resistance to rice stem borers under
laboratory and field conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology, 103:1444‐1453.
Kohli, A., Miro, B., Twyman, R.M. (2010). Transgene integration, expression and stability in
plants: Strategies for improvements. In Transgenic crop plants (pp.201‐237). Springer
Berlin Heidelberg.
Chen, L., Marmey, P., Taylor, N.J., Brizard, J‐P., Espinoza, C., D’Cruz, P., Huet, H., Zhang, S.,
de Kochko, A., Beachy, R.N., Fauquet, C.M. (1998). Expression and inheritance of
multiple transgenes in rice plants. Nature Biotechnology, 16:1060‐1064.
Citadin, C.T., Ibrahim, A.B., Aragao, F.J.L. (2011). Genetic engineering in cowpea (Vigna
unguiculata): History, status and prospects. GM Crops, 2:144‐149.
Citadin, C.T., Cruz, A.R.R., Aragao, F.J.L. (2013). Development of transgenic imazapyr‐
tolerant cowpea (Vigna unguiculata). Plant Cell Reports, 32:537‐543.
Corbin, D.R., Grebenok, R.J., Ohnmeiss, T.E., Greenplate, J.T., Purcell, J.P. (2001). Expression
and chloroplast targeting of cholesterol oxidase in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant
Physiology, 126:1116‐1128.
Cottrell, J.S. (2011). Protein identification using MS/MS data. Journal of Proteomics,
74:1842‐1851.
Crickmore, N., Zeigler, D.R., Feitelson, J., Schnepf, E., van Rie, J., Lereclus, D., Baum, J., Dean,
D.H. (1998). Revision of the Nomenclature for the Bacillus thuringiensis pesticidal
crystal proteins. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 62:807‐813.
Crickmore, N., Zeigler, D.R., Schnepf, E., Van Rie, J., Lereclus, D., Baum, J., … Dean, D.H.
(2012). “Bacillus thuringiensis toxin nomenclature”.
http://www.lifesci.successex.ac.uk/Home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/
Crickmore, N., Baum, J., Bravo, A., Lereclus, D., Narva, K., Sampson, K., Schnepf, E., Sun, M.
and Zeigler, D.R. "Bacillus thuringiensis toxin nomenclature" (2014)
http://www.btnomenclature.info/
103
Cruz, A.R.R. and Aragao, F.J.L. (2014). RNAi‐based enhanced resistance to cowpea severe
mosaic virus and cowpea aphid‐borne mosaic virus in transgenic cowpea. Plant
Pathology, 63:831‐837.
Dang, W. and Wei, Z‐M. (2007). An optimized Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation for
soybean for expression of binary insect resistance genes. Plant Science, 173:381‐389.
de Maagd, R.A., Bravo, A., Berry, C., Crickmore, N., Schnepf, E. (2003). Structure, diversity
and evolution of protein toxins from spore‐forming entomopathogenic bacteria.
Annual Review of Genetics, 37:409‐433.
Deineko, E.V., Zagorskaya, A.A., Shumny, V.K. (2007). T‐DNA‐Induced mutations in
transgenic plants. Russian Journal of Genetics, 43:1‐11.
Dhurua, S. and Gujar, G.T. (2011). Field‐evolved resistance to Bt toxin Cry1Ac in the pink
bollworm, Pectinohora gossypiella (Saunders) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), from India.
Pest Management Science, 67:898‐903.
Doss, V.A., Kumar, K.A., Jayakumar, R., Sekar, V. (2002). Cloning and expression of the
vegetative insecticidal protein (vVp3V) gene of Bacillus thuringiensis in Escherichia
coli. Protein Expression and Purification, 26:82‐88.
Dugje, I.Y., Omoigui, L.O., Ekeleme, F., Kamara, A.Y., Ajeigbe, H. (2009). Farmers’ guide to
cowpea production in West Africa. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Ehlers, J.D. and Hall, A.E. (1997). Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Field Crops Research,
53:187‐204.
Emechebe, A.M. and Florini, D.A. (1997). Shoot and pod diseases of cowpea induced by
fungi and bacteria. In: Singh, B.B., Raj, D.R.M., Dashiell, K.E., Jackai, L.E.N. (eds.).
Advances in Cowpea Research. Copublication of International Institute of Tropical
Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences
(JIRCAS). IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. pp 176‐192.
Emechebe, A.M. and Lagoke, S.T.O. (2002). Recent advances in research on cowpea
diseases. In: Challenges and opportunities for enhancing sustainable cowpea
104
production. Fatokun, C.A., Tarawali, S.A., Singh, B.B., Kormawa, P.M., Tamo, M.
(eds.). Proceedings of the World Cowpea Conference III held at the International
institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, 4‐8 September 2000. IITA,
Ibadan, Nigeria. pp. 94‐120.
Escudero, I.R., Banyuls, N., Bel, Y., Maeztu, M., Escriche, B., Munoz, D., Caballero, P., Ferre, J.
(2014). A screening of five Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3A proteins for their activity
against lepidopteran pests. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 117:51‐55.
Estruch, J.J., Warren, G.W., Mullins, M.A., Nye, G.J., Craig, J.A., Koziel, M.G. (1996). Vip3A, a
novel Bacillus thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein with a wide spectrum of
activities against lepidopteran insects. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 93:5389‐5394.
Estruch, J.J., Carozzi, N.B., Desai, N., Duck, N.B., Warren, G.W., Koziel, M.G. (1997).
Transgenic plants: An emerging approach to pest control. Nature Biotechnology,
15:137‐141.
Falck‐Zepeda, J., Gruere, G., Sithole‐Niang, I. (2013). Introduction and Background. In: Falck‐
Zepeda, J., Gruere, G., Sithole‐Niang, I. (eds.). Genetically Modified Crops in Africa:
Economic and Policy Lessons from Countries South of the Sahara. International Food
Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
FAOSTAT (2012): http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx
FAOSTAT (2013): http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E
Fatokun, C.A. (2002). Breeding cowpea for resistance to insect pests: attempted crosses
between cowpea and Vigna vexillata. In: Fatokun, C.A., Tarawali, S.A., Singh, B.B.,
Kormawa, P.M., Tamo, M. (eds.). Challenges and opportunities for enhancing
sustainable cowpea production. Proceedings of the World Cowpea Conference III
held at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, 4‐8
September 2000. IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. pp 52‐61.
Ferre, J., Real, M.D., Van Rie, J., Jansens, S., Peferoen, M. (1991). Resistance to the Bacillus
thuringiensis bioinsecticide in a field population of Plutella xylostella is due to a
105
change in a midgut membrane receptor. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 88:5119‐5123.
Fery, R.L. (2002). New opportunities in Vigna. In: Janick, J. And Whipkey, A. (eds.). Trends in
new crops and new uses. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA. pp.424‐428.
Fitt, G.P. (2003). Implementation and impact of transgenic Bt cotton in Australia. ICAC
Recorder, 21:14‐19.
Fitt, G.P. (2008). Have Bt crops led to changes in insecticide use patterns and impacted IPM?
In: Romeis, J., Selton, A.M., Kennedy, G.G. (Eds.), Integration of Insect‐Resistant
Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs. Springer Science+Business Media
B.V. pp.303‐328.
Frommer, W.B. and Ninnemann, O. (1994). Heterologous expression of genes in bacterial,
fungal, animal, and plant cells. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 46:419‐444.
Ganguly, M., Molla, K.A., Karmakar, S., Datta, K., Datta, S.K. (2014). Development of pod
borer‐resistant transgenic chickpea using a pod‐specific and a constitutive promoter‐
driven fused cry1Ab/Ac gene. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 127:2555‐2565.
Garcia, J.A., Hille, J., Vos, P., Goldback, R. (1987). Transformation of cowpea Vigna
unguiculata with a full length DNA copy of cowpea mosaic virus m‐RNA. Plant
Science, 48:89‐98.
Garry, V.F. (2004). Pesticides and children. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 198:152‐
163.
Gatehouse, J.A. (2008). Biotechnological prospects for engineering insect‐resistant plants.
Plant physiology, 146:881‐887.
Gibson, D.G., Young, L., Chuang, R., Venter, J.C., Hutchison, C.A III, Smith, H.O. (2009).
Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nature
Methods, 6:343‐345.
Gibson, D.G. (2011). Enzymatic assembly of overlapping DNA fragments. Methods in
Enzymology, 498:349‐361.
106
Gillaspie, A.G. (2001). Resistance to Cucumber mosaic virus in Cowpea and Implications for
Control of Cowpea Stunt Disease. Plant Disease, 85:1004‐1005.
Gleave, A.P. (1992). A versatile binary vector system with a T‐DNA organisational structure
conducive to efficient integration of cloned DNA into the plant genome. Plant
Molecular Biology, 20:1203‐1207.
Gouffon, C., Van Vliet, A., Van Rie, J., Jansens, S., Jurat‐Fuentes, J.L. (2011). Binding sites for
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry2Ae toxin on Heliothine Brush Border Membrane Vesicles
are not shared with Cry1A, Cry1F, or Vip3A toxin. Applied and Environmental
Microbiology, 77:3182‐3188.
Gould, F. (1998) Sustainability of transgenic insecticidal cultivars: integrating pest genetics
and ecology. Annual Review of Entomology, 43:701–726.
Gryspeirt, A. and Gregoire, J‐C. (2012). Effectiveness of the high dose/refuge strategy for
managing pest resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) plants expressing one or two
toxins. Toxins, 4:810‐835.
Hall, A.E., Singh, B.B., Ehlers, J.D. (1997). Cowpea breeding. In: Plant Breeding Reviews.
Janick (ed.). Volume 15:237‐340. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Oxford, UK.
Hall, A.E., Cisse, N., Thiaw, S., Elawad, H.O.A., Ehlers, J.D., Ismail, A.M., Fery, R.L., Roberts,
P.A., Kitch, L.W., Murdock, L.L., Boukar, O., Phillips, R.D., McWatters, K.H. (2003).
Development of cowpea cultivars and germplasm by the Bean/Cowpea CRSP. Field
Crops Research, 82:103‐134.
Hampton, R.O., Thottappilly, G., Rossel, H.W. (1997). Viral diseases of cowpea and their
control by resistance‐conferring genes. In: Singh, B.B., Raj, D.R.M., Dashiell, K.E.,
Jackai, L.E.N. (eds.). Advances in Cowpea Research. Copublication of International
Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for
Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS). IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria. pp 159‐175.
Harwood, R.R. (1979). Small Farm Development: Understanding and improving farming
systems in the humid tropics. International Agricultural Development Service,
Westview Press, Inc. Boulder, Colorado, USA.
107
Hernandez, D., Rodriguez‐Cabrera, L., Valdes, R., Moran, I., Tellez, P., Riveron, A., Ramos, Y.,
Gomez, L., Ayra‐Pardo, C. (2013). Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa1 expression and
purification from E. coli to be determined in seeds and leaves of genetically‐modified
corn plants. Journal of Agronomy, 12:153‐167.
Hernandez‐Martinez, P., Hernandez‐Rodriquez, C.S., Van Rie, J., Escriche, B., Ferre, J. (2013).
Insecticidal activity of Vip3Aa, Vip3Ad, Vip3Ae, and Vip3Af from Bacillus thuringiensis
against lepidopteran corn pests. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 113: 78‐81.
Hernandez‐Rodriguez, C.S., Boets, A., Van Rie, J., Ferre, J. (2009). Screening and
identification of vip genes in Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Journal of Applied
Microbiology, 107:219‐225.
Higgins, T.J.V., Gollasch, S., Molvig, L. et al. (2012) Insect‐protected cowpeas using gene
technology. In: Boukar O, Coulibaly O, Fatokun CA et al (eds). Innovative research
along the cowpea value chain. Proceedings of the Fifth World Cowpea Conference
on Improving livelihoods in the cowpea value chain through advancement in science.
Saly, Senegal 27 September – 1 October 2010. International Institute of Tropical
Agriculture. Ibadan, Nigeria, pp 131‐137.
Hofte, H. and Whiteley, H.R. (1989). Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis.
Microbiological Reviews, 53:242‐255.
Huang, F., Qureshi, J.A., Meagher, R.L.Jr., Reisig, D.D., Head, G.P., Andow, D.A., Ni, X., Kerns,
D., Buntin, D.G., Niu, Y., Yang, F., Dangal, V. (2014). Cry1F resistance in fall
armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda: Single gene versus pyramided Bt maize. PLoS
ONE, 9:e112958.
Huynh, B‐L., Ehlers, J.D., Ndeve, A., Wanamaker, S., Lucas, M.R., Close, T.J., Roberts, P.A.
(2015). Genetic mapping and legume synteny of aphid resistance in African cowpea
(Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.) grown in California. Molecular Breeding, 35:1‐9.
Indurker, S., Misra, H.S., Eapen, S. (2010). Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation in
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) with an insecticidal protein gene: optimisation of
different factors. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 16:273‐284.
108
Ishida, Y., Hiei, Y., Komari, T. (2007). Agrobacterium‐mediated transformation of maize.
Nature Protocols, 2:1614‐1621.
Isman, M.B. (2010). Botanical insecticides, deterrents, repellents, oils. In: Singh, B.P. (eds.).
Industrial Crops and Uses, CAB International. pp. 433‐445.
Ivo, N.L., Naschimento, C.P., Vieira, L.S., Campos, F.A.P., Aragao, F.J.L. (2008). Biolisitic‐
mediated genetic transformation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) and stable
mendelian inheritance of transgenes. Plant Cell Reports, 27:1475‐1483.
Jackai, L.E.N. (1995). The legume pod borer Maruca testulalis, and its principal host plant,
Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. – use of selective insecticide sprays as an aid in the
identification of useful levels of resistance. Crop protection, 14:299‐306.
Jackai, L.E.N. and Daoust, R.A. (1986). Insect pests of cowpeas. Annual Review of
Entomology, 31:95‐119.
Jackai, L.E.N., and Raulston, J.R. (1988). Rearing the legume pod borer, Maruca testulalis,
Geyer (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on artificial diet. Tropical Pest Management, 34:168‐
172.
James, C. (2014). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops. ISAAA Brief No. 49.
ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
Jong de W.W., Zweers, A., Cohen, L.H. (1978). Influence of single amino acid substitutions on
electrophoretic mobility of sodium dodecyl sulfate‐protein complexes. Biochemical
and Biophysical Research Communications, 82:532‐539
Jounanin, L., Bonade‐Bottino, M., Girard, C., Morrot, G., Giband, M. (1998). Transgenic
plants for insect resistance. Plant Science, 131:1‐11.
Kar, S., Basu, D., Das, S., Ramkrishnan, N.A., Mukherjee, P., Nayak, P., Sen, S.K. (1997).
Expression of cry1Ac gene of Bacillus thuringiensis in transgenic chickpea plants
inhibits development of pod‐borer (Heliothis armigera) larvae. Transgenic Research,
6:177‐185.
109
Kaur, S. (2000). Molecular approaches towards development of novel Bacillus thuringiensis
biopesticides. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 16:781‐793.
Kawuki, R.S., Agona, A., Nampala, P., Adipala, E. (2005). A comparison of effectiveness of
plant‐based and synthetic insecticides in the field management of pod and storage
pests of cowpea. Crop Protection, 24:473‐478.
Kirkpatrick, T.L. and Morelock, T.E. (1987). Response of cowpea breeding lines and cultivars
to Meloidogyne incognita and M. arenaria. Annals of Applied Nematology, 1:46‐49.
Kohli, A., Miro, B., Twyman, R.M. (2010). Transgene integration, expression and stability in
plants: strategies for improvements. In Transgenic crop plants. Springer Berlin
Heidelberg. pp. 201‐237.
Kurtz, R.W., McCaffery, A., O’Reilly, D. (2007). Insect resistance management for Syngenta’s
VipCot™ transgenic cotton. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 95:227‐230.
Labuschagne, M.T., Verhoeven, R., Nkouanessi, M. (2008). Drought tolerance assessment of
African cowpea accessions based on stomatal behaviour and cell membrane stability.
Journal of Agricultural Science, 146:689‐694.
Lane, J.A., Bailey, J.A., Terry, P.J. (1991). An in‐vitro growth system for studying the
parasitism of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) by Striga gesnerioides. Weed Research,
31:211‐217.
Larkin, M.A., Blackshields, G., Brown, N.P., Chenna, R., McGettigan, P.A., McWilliam, H.,
Valentin F., Wallace, I.M., Wilm, A., Lopez, R., Thompson, J.D., Higgins, D.G. (2007).
Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics, 23:2947‐2948.
http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/services/web/toolform.ebi?tool=clustalw2
Lazo, G.R., Stein, P.A., Ludwig, R.A. (1991). A DNA transformation competent Arabidopsis
genomic library in Agrobacterium. Bio Technology, 9:963‐967.
Le, B‐V., Cruz de Carvalho, M.H., Zuily‐Fodil, Y., Thi, A.T.P., Van, K.T.T. (2002). Direct whole
plant regeneration of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp] from cotyledonary node
thin cell layer explants. Journal of Plant Physiology, 159:1255‐1258.
110
Lebendiker, M. and Danieli, T. (2014). Production of prone‐to‐aggregate proteins. FEBS
Letters, 588:236‐246.
Lechner, M., Kupke, T., Stefanovic, S., Gotz, F. (1989). Molecular characterization and
sequence of phosphatidylinositol‐specific phospholipase C of Bacillus thuringiensis.
Molecular Microbiology, 3:621‐626 1989.
Lee, M.K., Walters, F.S., Hart, H., Palekar, N., Chen, J‐S. (2003). The mode of action of the
Bacillus thuringiensis Vegetative Insecticidal Protein Vip3A differs from that of
Cry1Ab δ‐endotoxin. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69:4648‐4657.
Leuber, M., Orlik, F., Schiffler, B., Sickmann, A., Benz, R. (2006). Vegetative Insecticidal
Protein (Vip1Ac) of Bacillus thuringiensis HD201: Evidence for Oligomer and Channel
Formation. Biochemistry, 45:283‐288.
Li, H., Shu, C., He, X., Gao, J., Liu, R., Huang, D. (2012). Detection and identification of
vegetative insecticidal proteins vip3 genes of Bacillus thuringiensis strains using
polymerase chain reaction‐high resolution melt analysis. Current Microbiology,
64:463‐468.
Liu, F., Xu, Z., Zhu, Y.C., Huang, F., Wang, Y., Li, H., Li, H., Gao, C., Zhou, W., Shen, J. (2010).
Evidence of field‐evolved resistance to Cry1Ac‐expressing Bt cotton in Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in northern China. Pest Management Science,
66:155‐161.
Liu, B‐Y and Chang, J‐Y. (2010). Rapid and irreversible reduction of protein disulfide bonds.
Analytical Biochemistry, 405:67‐72.
Liu, J., Song, F., Zhang, J., Liu, R., He, K., Tan, J., Huang, D. (2007). Identification of vip3A‐type
genes from Bacillus thuringiensis strains and characterization of a novel vip3A‐type
gene. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 45:432‐438.
Machuka, J., Adesoye, A., Obembe, O.O. (2000). Regeneration and genetic transformation in
cowpea. In: C.A. Fatokun, S.A. Tarawali, B.B. Singh, P.M. Kormawa, M. Tamo (Eds.),
Challenges and opportunities for enhancing sustainable cowpea production.
Proceedings of the World Cowpea Conference, pp.185‐196. Ibadan, Nigeria: IITA.
111
Mahon, R.J., Olsen, K.M., Garsia, K.A., Young, S.R. (2007). Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis
toxin Cry2Ab in a strain of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in
Australia. Journal of Economic Entomology, 100:894‐902.
Manman, T., Qian, L., Huaqiang, T., Yongpeng, Z., Jia, L., Huanxiu, L. (2013). A review of
regeneration and genetic transformation in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp).
African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8:1115‐1122.
Mao, J.Q., Zaidi, M.A., Arnason, J.T., Altosaar, I. (2006). In vitro regeneration of Vigna
unguiculata (L.) Walp. Cv. Blackeye cowpea via shoot organogenesis. Plant Cell,
Tissue and Organ Culture, 87:121‐125.
Margam, V.M., Coates, B.S., Ba, M.N., Sun, W., Binso‐Dabire, C.L., Baoua, I., Ishiyaku, M.F.,
Shukle, J.T., Hellmich, R.L., Covas, F.G., Ramasamy, S., Armstrong, J., Pittendrigh, B.r.,
Murdock, L.L. (2011). Geographic distribution of phylogenetically‐distinct legume
pod borer, Maruca vitrata (Lepidoptera: Pyraloidea: Crambidae). Molecular Biology
Reports, 38:893‐903.
Matrix Science, 2014. http://www.matrixscience.com/
Matzke, A.J.M. and Matzke, M.A. (1998). Position effects and epigenetic silencing of plant
transgenes. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 1:142‐148.
Mehrotra, M., Singh A.K., Sanyal, I., Altosaar, I., Amla, D.V. (2011). Pyramiding of modified
cry1Ab and cry1Ac genes of Bacillus thuringiensis in transgenic chickpea (Cicer
arietinum L.) for improved resistance to pod borer insect Helicoverpa armigera.
Euphytica, 182:87‐102.
Miklos, J.A., Alibhai, M.F., Bledig, S.A., Connor‐Ward, D.C., Gao, A‐G., Holmes, B.A., Kolacz,
K.H., Kabuye, V.T., MacRae, T.C., Paradise, M.S., Toedebusch, A.S., Harrison, L.A.
(2007). Characterization of soybean exhibiting high expression of a synthetic Bacillus
thuringiensis cry1A transgene that confers a high degree of resistance to
lepidopteran pests. Crop Science, 47:148‐157.
112
Mohammed, B.S., Ishiyaku, M.F., Abdullahi, U.S., Katung, M.D. (2014). Response of
transgenic Bt cowpea lines and their hybrids under field conditions. Journal of Plant
Breeding and Crop Science, 6:91‐96.
Murdock, L.L., Coulibaly, O., Higgins, T.J.V., Huesing, J.E., Ishiyaku, M., and Sithole‐Niang, I
(2008). Cowpea. In C. Kole & T.C. Hall (Eds.), Compendium of Transgenic Crop Plants:
Transgenic Legume Grains and Forages (pp. 23‐56). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Murdock, L., Sithole‐Niang, I., Higgins, T.J.V. (2013). Transforming the cowpea, an African
orphan staple crop grown predominantly by women. In: Bennett, D.J. and Jennings,
R.C (eds.). Successful Agricultural Innovation in Emerging Economies. pp. 221‐232
[Online]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available from: Cambridge Books
Online.
Ngakou, A., Tamo, M., Parh, I.A., Nwaga, D., Ntonifor, N.N., Korie, S., Nebane, C.L.N. (2008).
Management of cowpea flower thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti (Thysanoptera,
Thripidae), in Cameroon. Crop Protection, 27:481‐488.
Nielsen, S.S., Ohler, T.A., Mitchell, C.A. (1997). Cowpea leaves for human consumption:
production, utilization, and nutrient composition. In: Singh, B.B., Mohan, R.D.R.,
Dashiell, K.E., Jackai, L.E.N (eds.). Advances in Cowpea Research. pp. 326‐332.
Copublication of International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and Japan
International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS). IITA, Ibadan,
Nigeria.
Niu, Y., Yang, F., Dangal, V., Huang, F. (2014). Larval survival and plant injury of Cry1F‐
susceptible, ‐resistant, and –heterozygous fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
on non‐Bt and Bt corn containing single or pyramided genes. Crop Protection, 59:22‐
28.
Nkongolo, K.K., Bokosi, J., Malusi, M., Vokhiwa, Z., Mphepo, M. (2009). Agronomic, culinary,
and general characterization of selected cowpea elite lines using farmers’ and
breeder’s knowledge: A case study from Malawi. African Journal of Plant Science,
3:147‐156.
113
Odendo, M., Bationo, A., Kimani, S. (2011). Socio‐Economic contribution of legumes to
livelihoods in sub‐Saharan Africa. In: Bationo, A., Waswa, B., Okeyo, J.M., Maina, F.,
Kihara, J., Mokwunye, U. (eds.). Fighting poverty in Sub‐Saharan Africa: The multiple
roles of legumes in integrated soil fertility management. Springer Science+Business
Media B.V. pp. 27‐46.
Ofuya, T.I. (1997). Control of the cowpea aphid, Aphis craccivora Koch (Homoptera:
Aphididae), in cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Integrated Pest Management
Reviews, 2:199‐207.
Okechukwu, R.U. and Ekpo, E.J.A. (2004). Sources of Resistance to Cowpea Bacterial Blight
Disease in Nigeria. Journal of Phytopathology, 152:345‐351.
Okeyo‐Owuor, J.B., Agwaro, P.O. and Simbi, C.O.J. (1983). Studies on the legume pod‐borer,
Maruca testulalis (Geyer) – V: Larval Population. Insect Science and its Application,
1:75‐81.
Olabi, O.Y., Odebiyi, J.A., Jackai, L.E.N. (2003). Field evaluation of cowpea cultivars (Vigna
unguiculata [L.] Walp.) for resistance to flower bud thrips (Megalurothrips sjostedti
Trybom) Thysanoptera: Thripidae). International Journal of Pest Management,
49:287‐291.
Olabi, O.Y., Odebiyi, J.A., Tamo, M. (2004). Effect of host plant resistance in some cowpea
(Vigna unguiculata {L.} Walp.) cultivars on growth and developmental parameters of
the flower bud thrips, Megalurothrips sjostedti (Trybom). Crop Protection, 23:83‐88.
Padulosi, S. and Ng, N.Q. (1997). Origin, taxonomy, and morphology of Vigna unguiculata (L.)
Walp. In: In: Singh, B.B., Mohan, R.D.R., Dashiell, K.E., Jackai, L.E.N (eds.). Advances in
cowpea research. pp. 1‐12. Copublication of International Institute of Tropical
Agriculture (IITA) and Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences
(JIRCAS). IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Palekar, N., Kurtz, R.W., Walters, F.S., O’Reilly, D. (2011). Relative efficacy of cotton events
expressing Cry1Ab and Vip3A against cotton bollworm and tobacco budworm
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The Journal of Cotton Science, 15:100‐108.
114
Palma, L, Hernandez‐Rodriguez, C.S., Maeztu, M., Hernandez‐Martinez, P., de Escudero, I.R.,
Escriche, B., Munoz, D., Van Rie, J., Ferre, J., Caballero, P. (2012). Vip3C, a novel class
of vegetative insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. Applied and
Environmental Microbiology, 78:7163‐7165.
Palma, L., de Escudero, I.R., Maeztu, M., Caballero, P., Munoz, D. (2013). Screening of vip
genes from a Spanish Bacillus thuringiensis collection and characterization of two
Vip3 proteins highly specific to five lepidopteran crop pests. Biological Control,
66:141‐149.
Parker, C. and Polniaszek, T.I. (1990). Parasitism of cowpea by Striga gesnerioides: variation
in virulence and discovery of a new source of host resistance. Annals of Applied
Biology, 116:305‐311.
Pasquet, R.S. (1999). Genetic relationships among subspecies of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.
based on allozyme variation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 98:1104‐1119.
Pasquet, R.S. (2000). Allozyme diversity of cultivated cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 101:211‐219.
Penza, R., Lurquin, P.F., Filippone, E. (1991). Gene transfer by co‐cultivation of mature
embryos with Agrobacterium tumefaciens: application to cowpea (Vigna unguiculata
L. Walp). Journal of Plant Physiology, 138:39‐43.
Perlak, F.J., Deaton, R.W., Armstrong, T. A., Fuchs, R.L., Sims, S.R., Greenplate, J.T. Fischhoff,
D.A. (1990). Insect resistant cotton plants. Nature Biotechnology, 8:939‐943.
Perlak, F.J., Fuchs, R.L., Dean, D.A., McPherson, S.L., Fischhoff, D.A. (1991). Modification of
the coding sequence enhances plant expression of insect control protein genes.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 88:3324‐3328.
Perlak, F.J., Oppenhuizen, M., Gustafson, K. Voth, R, Sivasupramaniam, S., Heering, D.,
Carey, B., Ihrig, R.A., Roberts, J.K. (2001). Development and commercial use of
Bollgard cotton in the USA – early promises versus today’s reality. The Plant Journal,
27:489‐501.
115
Pimentel, D., Acquay, H., Biltonen, M., Rice, P., Silva, M., Nelson, J., Lipner, V., Giordano, S.,
Horowitz, A., D’Amore, M. (1992). Environmental and economic costs of pesticide
use. BioScience, 42:750‐760.
Popelka, J.C., Gollasch, S., Moore, A., Molvig, L., Higgins, T.J.V. (2006). Genetic
transformation of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) and stable transmission of the
transgenes to progeny. Plant Cell Reports, 25:304‐312.
Qaim, M. (2009). The Economics of Genetically Modified Crops. Annual Review of Resource
Economics, 1:665‐693.
Qaim, M. and Kouser, S. (2013). Genetically modified crops and food security. PLoS ONE,
8:e64871.
Ramakrishnan, K., Gnanam, R., Sivakumar, P., Manickam, A. (2005). In vitro somatic
embryogenesis from cell suspension cultures of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.)
Walp]. Plant Cell Reports, 24:449‐461.
Raman, K.V., Singh, S.R., Van Emden, H.F. (1978). Yield losses in cowpea following
leafhopper damage. Journal of Economic Entomology, 71:936‐938.
Rang, C., Gil, P., Neisner, N., Rie Van J., Frutos, R. (2005). Novel Vip3‐Related protein from
Bacillus thuringiensis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71:6276‐6281.
Raveendar, S., Premkumar, A., Sasikumar, S., Ignacimuthu, S., Agastian, P. (2009).
Development of a rapid, highly efficient system of organogenesis in cowpea Vigna
unguiculata (L.) Walp. South African Journal of Botany, 75:17‐21.
Raveendar, S., and Ignacimuthu, S. (2010). Improved Agrobacterium mediated
transformation in Cowpea Vigna unguiculata L. Walp. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences,
9:256‐263.
Rodgers, P.B. (1993). Potential of biopesticides in agriculture. Pesticide Science, 39:117‐129.
Rouhibakhsh, A. and Malathi, V.G. (2005). Severe leaf curl disease of cowpea – a new
disease of cowpea in northern India caused by Mungbean yellow mosaic India virus
and a satellite DNA . Plant Pathology, 54:259.
116
Roush, R. (1998). Two‐toxin strategies for management of insecticidal transgenic crops: can
pyramiding succeed where pesticide mixtures have not? Philosophical Transactions
of the Royal Society B, 353:1777‐1786.
Sanchis, V. and Bourguet, D. (2008). Bacillus thuringiensis: applications in agriculture and
insect resistance management. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development,
28:11‐20.
Sanyal I., Singh, A.K., Kaushik, M., Amla, D.V. (2005). Agrobacterium‐mediated
transformation of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) with Bacillus thuringiensis cry1Ac
gene for resistance against pod borer insect Helicoverpa armigera. Plant Science,
168:1135‐1146.
Sauka, D.H., Rodriguez, S.E., Benintende, G.B. (2013). New variants of lepidoptericidal toxin
genes encoding Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa proteins. Journal of Molecular
Microbiology and Biotechnology, 22:373‐380.
Schagger, H. and von Jagow, G. (1987). Tricine‐Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate‐Polyacrylamide Gel
Electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa.
Analytical Biochemistry, 166:368‐379.
Schnepf, E., Crickmore, N., Van Rie, J., Lereclus, D., Baum, J., Feitelson, J., Zeigler, D.R., Dean,
D.H. (1998). Bacillus thuringiensis and its pesticidal crystal proteins. Microbiology
and Molecular Biology Reviews, 62: 775‐806.
Schuler, T.H., Poppy, G.M., Kerry, B.R., Denholm, I. (1998). Insect‐resistant transgenic plants.
Trends in Biotechnology, 16:168‐175.
Schunmann, P.H.D., Llewellyn, D.J., Surin, B., Boevink, P., De Feyter, R.C., Waterhouse, P.M.
(2003). A suite of novel promoters and terminators for plant biotechnology.
Functional Plant Biology, 30:443‐452.
Seifinejad, A., Jouzani, G.R.S., Hosseinzadeh, A., Abdmishani, C. (2008). Characterization of
lepidoptera‐active cry and vip genes in Iranian Bacillus thuringiensis strain collection.
Biological Control, 44:216‐226.
117
Sharma, H.C. (1998). Bionomics, host plant resistance, and management of the legume pod
borer, Maruca vitrata – a review. Crop protection, 17:373‐386.
Sharma, H.C., Saxena, K.B., Bhagwat, V.R. (1999). The Legume pod borer, Maruca vitrata:
bionomics and management. Information Bulletin no. 55. Patancheru 502324,
Andhra Pradesh, India; Internatonal Crops Research Institute for the Semi‐Arid
Tropics. pp. 42.
Shelton, A.M., Zhao, J‐Z., Roush, R.T. (2002). Economic, ecological, food safety and social
consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants. Annual Review of
Entomology, 47:845‐881.
Singh, S.R., and Allen, D.J. (1979). Cowpea pests and diseases (no.2). Ibadan, Nigeria:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture.
Singh, S.R and Van Emden, H.F. (1979). Insect pests of grain legumes. Annual Review of
Entomology, 24:255‐278.
Singh, U. and Singh, B. (1992). Tropical grain legumes as important human foods. Economic
Botany, 46:310‐321.
Singh, B.B., Ehlers, J.D., Sharma, B., Freire Filho, F.R. (2002). Recent progress in cowpea
breeding. In: Fatokun, C.A., Tarawali, S.A., Singh, B.B., Kormawa, P.M., Tamo, M.
(eds.). Challenges and opportunities for enhancing sustainable cowpea production.
Proceedings of the World Cowpea Conference III held at the International Institute of
Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, 4‐8 September 2000. IITA, Ibadan,
Nigeria. pp 22‐51.
Singh, B.B., Ajeigbe, H.A., Tarawali, S.A., Fernandez‐Rivera, S., Abubakar, M. (2003).
Improving the production and utilization of cowpea as food and fodder. Field Crops
Research, 84:169‐177.
Singh, G., Sachdev, B., Sharma N., Seth, R., Bhatnagar, R.K. (2010). Interaction of Bacillus
thuringiensis Vegetative Insecticidal Protein with Ribosomal S2 protein triggers
larvicidal activity in Spodoptera frugiperda. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,
76:7202‐7209.
118
Solleti, S.K., Bakshi, S., Purkayastha, J., Panda, S.K., Sahoo, L. (2008). Transgenic cowpea
(Vigna unguiculata) seeds expressing a bean alpha‐amylase inhibitor 1 confer
resistance to storage pests, bruchid beetles. Plant Cell Reports, 27:1841‐1850.
Somers, D. A., Samac, D.A., Olhoft, P.M. (2003). Recent advances in legume transformation.
Plant Physiology, 131:892‐899.
Sorensen, H. P. and Mortensen, K. K. (2005). Soluble expression of recombinant proteins in
the cytoplasm of Escherichia coli. Microbial Cell Factories, 4:1.
Srinivasan, R. (2008). Susceptibility of legume pod borer (LPB), Maruca vitrata to δ‐
endotoxins of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) in Taiwan. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology,
97:79‐81.
Stam, M., Mol, J. N. M., Kooter, J.M. (1997). The silence of genes in transgenic plants. Annals
of Botany, 79:3‐12.
Stewart, S. D., Adamczyk Jr., J. J., Knighten, K. S., Davis, F. M. (2001). Impact of Bt cottons
expressing one or two insecticidal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner on
growth and survival of Noctuid (Lepidoptera) larvae. Journal of Economic
Entomology, 94:752‐760.
Studier, F. W. (2005). Protein production by auto‐induction in high‐density shaking cultures.
Protein Expression and Purification, 41:207‐234.
Suh, J. B and Simbi, C. O. (1983). Studies on the legume pod‐borer, Maruca Testulalis
(Geyer) – VIII. Cowpea phenology and yield loss assessment: Effect of loss of leaves,
shoots, flowers and pods on cowpea yield in Western Kenya. Insect Science and its
Application, 4:89‐96.
Sumerford, D.V., Head, G.P., Shelton, A., Greenplate, J., Moar, W. (2013). Field‐evolved
resistance: Assessing the problem and ways to move forward. Journal of Economic
Entomology, 106:1525‐1534.
Tabashnik, B. E., Dennehy, T.J., Sims, M.A., Larkin, K., Head, G.P., Moar, W.J., Carriere, Y.
(2002). Control of resistant pink bollworm by transgenic cotton that produces
119
Bacillus thuringiensis toxin Cry2Ab. Applied and Environmental Microbiology,
98:3790‐3794.
Tabashnik, B.E., Carriere, Y., Dennehy, T.J., Morin, S., Sisterson, M.S., Roush, R.T., Shelton,
A.M., Zhao, J‐Z. (2003). Insect resistance to transgenic Bt crops: Lessons from the
laboratory and field. Journal of Economic Entomology, 96:1031‐1038.
Tabashnik, B.E., Gassmann, A.J., Crowder, D.W., Carriere, Y. (2008). Insect resistance to Bt
crops: evidence versus theory. Nature Biotechnology, 26:199‐202.
Tabe, L.M., Wardley‐Richardson, T., Ceriotti, A., Aryan, A., McNabb, W., Moore, A., Higgins,
T.J.V. (1995). A biotechnological approach to improving the nutrititve value of alfalfa.
Journal of Animal Science, 73:2752‐2759.
Takim, F. O. and Uddin, R.O. (2010). Effect of weed removal on insect populations and yield
of cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp]. Australian Journal of Agricultural
Engineering, 1:194‐199.
Taylor, T.A. (1968). The pathogenicity of Bacillus thuringiensis var. thuringiensis Berliner for
larvae of Maruca testulalis Geyer. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 11:386‐389.
Thakore, Y. (2006). The biopesticide market for global agricultural use. Industrial
Biotechnology, 2:194‐208.
Thottappilly, G. and Rossel, H.W. (1992). Virus diseases of cowpea in tropical Africa, Tropical
Pest Management, 38:337‐348.
Tiroesele, B., Thomas, K., Seketeme, S. (2015). Control of cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus
maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), using natural plant products. Insects, 6:77‐
84.
Toenniessen, G.H., O’Toole, J.C., DeVries, J. (2003). Advances in plant biotechnology and its
adoption in developing countries. Current Opinion in Plant biology, 6:191‐198.
Tomooka, N., Kaga, A., Isemura, T., Vaughan, D. (2011). Vigna. In: C. Kole (ed.). Wild Crop
Relatives: Genomic and Breeding Resources, Legume Crops and Forages, Springer‐
Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 291‐311.
120
Van der Salm, T., Bosch, D., Honee G., Feng, L., Munsterman, E., Bakker, P., Stiekema, W.J.,
Visser, B. (1994). Insect resistance of transgenic plants that express modified Bacillus
thuringiensis cry1A(b) and cry1C genes: a resistance management strategy. Plant
Molecular Biology, 26:51‐59.
Van Frankenhuyzen (2009). Insecticidal activity of Bacillus thuringiensis crystal proteins.
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 101:1‐16.
Visser, J.H., Dorr, I., Kollmann, R. (1977). On the parasitism of Alectra vogelii BENTH.
(Scrophulariaceae) I. Early development of the primary haustorium and initiation of
the stem. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie, 84:213‐222.
Visser, J.H., Dorr, I., Kollmann, R. (1990). Compatibility of Alectra vogelii with different
leguminous host species. Journal of Plant Physiology, 135:737‐745.
Wafula, D. and Guerre, G. (2013). Genetically Modified Organisms, Exports, and Regional
Integration in Africa. In: Falck‐Zepeda, J., Gruere, G., Sithole‐Niang, I. (eds.).
Genetically Modified Crops in Africa: Economic and Policy Lessons from Countries
South of the Sahara. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC,
USA.
Warren, G.W. (1997). Vegetative insecticidal proteins: novel proteins for control of corn
pests, p. 109‐121. In: N. Carozzi and M. Koziol (eds.)., Advances in insect control: the
role of transgenic plants. Taylor and Francis, London, United Kingdom.
Watkins, P.R., Huesing, J.E., Margam, V., Murdock, L.L., Higgins, T.J.V. (2011). Insects,
nematodes, and other pests. In: Altman, A. and Hasegwa, P.M. (eds.). Plant
Biotechnology and Agriculture. Oxford: Academic Press, pp. 353‐370.
Whalon, M.E. and Wingerd, B.A. (2003). Bt: Mode of Action and Use. Archives of Insect
Biochemistry and Physiology, 54:200‐211.
Whitehouse, M.E.A., Wilson, L.J., Constable, G.A. (2007). Target and non‐target effects on
the invertebrate community of Vip cotton, a new insecticidal transgenic. Australian
Journal of Agricultural Research, 58:273‐285.
121
Wilkinson, D.L. and Harrison, R.G. (1991). Predicting the solubility of recombinant proteins
in Escherichia coli. Biotechnology, 9:443‐448.
Williams, R.J. (1975). Diseases of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in Nigeria. Pest
Articles & News Summaries, 21:253‐267.
Wilson, F.D., Flint, H.M., Deaton, W.R., Fischhoff, D.A., Perlak, F.J., Armstrong, T.A., Fuchs,
R.L., Berberich, S.A., Parks, N.J (1992). Resistance of cotton lines containing a Bacillus
thuringiensis toxin to pink bollworm (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and other insects.
Journal of Economic Entomology, 84:1516‐1521.
Wong, E.Y., Hironaka, C.M., Fischhoff, D.A. (1992). Arabidopsis thaliana small subunit leader
and transit peptide enhance the expression of Bacillus thuringiensis proteins in
transgenic plants. Plant Molecular Biology, 20:81‐93.
Wu, J., Luo, X., Zhang, X., Shi, Y., Tian, Y. (2011). Development of insect‐resistant transgenic
cotton with chimeric TVip3A* accumulating in chloroplasts. Transgenic Research,
20:963‐973.
Yang, F., Huan, F., Qureshi, J.A., Leonard, B.R., Niu, Y., Zhang, L., Wangila, D.S. (2013).
Susceptibility of Louisiana and Florida populations of Spodoptera frugiperda
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to transgenic Agrisure® Viptera™ 3111 corn. Crop
Protection, 50:37‐39.
Yu, C.G., Mullins, M.A., Warren, G.W., Koziel, M.G., Estruch, J.J. (1997). The Bacillus
thuringiensis vegetative insecticidal protein Vip3A lyses midgut epithelium cells of
susceptible insects. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63:532‐536.
Yu, X., Liu, T., Liang, X., Tang, C., Zhu, J., Wang, S., Li, S., Deng, Q., Wang, L., Zheng, A., Li. P.
(2011a). Rapid detection of vip1‐type genes from Bacillus cereus and
characterization of a novel vip binary toxin gene. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 325:30‐
36.
Yu, X., Zheng, A., Zhu, J., Wang, S., Wang, L., Deng, Q., Li, S., Liu, H., Li, P. (2011b).
Characterization of Vegetative Insecticidal Protein vip Genes of Bacillus thuringiensis
from Sichuan Basin in China. Current Microbiology, 62:752‐757.
122
Yule, S. and Srinivasan, R. (2013). Evaluation of bio‐pesticides against legume pod borer,
Maruca vitrata Fabricius (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in laboratory and field conditions
in Thailand. Journal of Asia‐Pacific Entomology, 16:357‐360.
123
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I: SUMMARY OF vip3 GENES SEQUENCING RESULTS
Group 1: vip3Aa35
>vip3Aa35_nucleotide ATGCATCATCACCACCATCACAACAAGAATAATACTAAATTAAGCACAAGAGCCTTACCAAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCACTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGTGATCTAACCCTAGACGAAATTTTAAAGAATCAGCAGTTACTAAATGATATTTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTGAATGGAAGCTTAAATGATCTTATCGCACAGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAAGAAATATTAAAAATTGCAAATGAACAAAATCAAGTTTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTCGATGCGATAAATACGATGCTTCGGGTATATCTACCTAAAATTACCTCTATGTTGAGTGATGTAATGAAACAAAATTATGCGCTAAGTCTGCAAATAGAATACTTAAGTAAACAATTGCAAGAGATTTCTGATAAGTTGGATATTATTAATGTAAATGTACTTATTAACTCTACACTTACTGAAATTACACCTGCGTATCAAAGGATTAAATATGTGAACGAAAAATTTGAGGAATTAACTTTTGCTACAGAAACTAGTTCAAAAGTAAAAAAGGATGGCTCTCCTGCAGATATTCTTGATGAGTTAACTGAGTTAACTGAACTAGCGAAAAGTGTAACAAAAAATGATGTGGATGGTTTTGAATTTTACCTTAATACATTCCACGATGTAATGGTAGGAAATAATTTATTCGGGCGTTCAGCTTTAAAAACTGCATCGGAATTAATTACTAAAGAAAATGTGAAAACAAGTGGCAGTGAGGTCGGAAATGTTTATAACTTCTTAATTGTATTAACAGCTCTGCAAGCAAAAGCTTTTCTTACTTTAACAACATGCCGAAAATTATTAGGCTTAGCAGATATTGATTATACTTCTATTATGAATGAACATTTAAATAAGGAAAAAGAGGAATTTAGAGTAAACATCCTCCCTACACTTTCTAATACTTTTTCTAATCCTAATTATGCAAAAGTTAAAGGAAGTGATGAAGATGCAAAGATGATTGTGGAAGCTAAACCAGGACATGCATTGGTTGGGTTTGAAATTAGTAATGATTCAATTACAGTATTAAAAGTATATGAGGCTAAGCTAAAACAAAATTATCAAGTTGATAAGGATTCCTTATCGGAAGTTATTTATGGTGATATGGATAAATTATTGTGCCCAGATCAATCTGAACAAATCTATTATACAAATAACATAGTATTTCCAAATGAATATGTAATTACTAAAATTGATTTTACTAAAAAAATGAAAACTTTAAGATATGAGGTAACAGCGAATTTTTATGATTCTTCTACAGGAGAAATTGACTTAAATAAGAAAAAAGTAGAATCAAGTGAAGCGGAGTATAGAACGTTAAGTGCTAATGATGATGGAGTGTATATGCCGTTAGGTGTCATCAGTGAAACATTTTTGACTCCGATTAATGGGTTTGGCCTCCAAGCTGATGAAAATTCAAGATTAATTACTTTAACATGTAAATCATATTTAAGAGAACTACTGCTAGCAACAGACTTAAGCAATAAAGAAACTAAATTGATCGTCCCGCCAAGTGGTTTTATTAAAAATATTGTAGAGAACGGGTCCATAGAAGAGGACAATTTAGAGCCGTGGAAAGCAAATAATAAGAATGCGTATGTAGATCATACAGGCGGAGTGAATGGAACTAAAGCTTTATATGTTCATAAcGACGGAGGAATTTCACAATTTATTGGAGATAAGTTAAAACCGAAAACTGAGTATGTAATCCAATATACTGTTAAAGGAAAACCTTCTATTCATTTAAAAGATGAAAATACTGGATATATTCATTATGAAGATACAAATAATAATTTAGAAGATTATCAAACTATTACTAAACGTTTTACTACAGGAACTGATTTAAAGGGAGTGTATTTAATTTTAAAAAGTCAAAATGGAGATGAAGCTTGGGGAGATAACTTTATTATTTTGGAAATTAGTCCTTCTGAAAAGTTATTAAGTCCAGAATTAATTAATACAAATAATTGGACGAGTACGGGATCAACTAATATTAGCGGTAATACACTCACTCTTTATCAGGGAGGACGAGGAATTCTAAAACAAAACCTTCAATTAGATAGTTTTTCAACTTATAGAGTGTATTTTTCTGTGTCCGGAGATGCTAATGTAAGGATTAGAAATTcTAGGGAAGTGTTATTTGAAAAAAGATATATGAGCGGTGCTAAAGATGTTTCTGAAATTTTCACTACAAAATTGGGAAAAGATAACTTTTATATAGAGCTTTCTCAAGGGAATAATTTAAATGGTGGCCCTATTGTCAAGTTTTCCGATGTCTCTATTAAGTAA Alignment of vip3Aa35 with reference GU733921.1 my_vip3Aa35 1 ATGCATCATCACCACCATCACAACAAGAATAATACTAAATTAAGCACAAG 50 ||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1 ATG------------------AACAAGAATAATACTAAATTAAGCACAAG 32 my_vip3Aa35 51 AGCCTTACCAAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCA 100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 33 AGCCTTACCAAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCA 82 my_vip3Aa35 101 CTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGT 150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 83 CTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGT 132 my_vip3Aa35 151 GATCTAACCCTAGACGAAATTTTAAAGAATCAGCAGTTACTAAATGATAT 200
124
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 133 GATCTAACCCTAGACGAAATTTTAAAGAATCAGCAGTTACTAAATGATAT 182 my_vip3Aa35 201 TTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTGAATGGAAGCTTAAATGATCTTATCGCAC 250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 183 TTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTGAATGGAAGCTTAAATGATCTTATCGCAC 232 my_vip3Aa35 251 AGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAAGAAATATTAAAAATTGCAAAT 300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 233 AGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAAGAAATATTAAAAATTGCAAAT 282 my_vip3Aa35 301 GAACAAAATCAAGTTTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTCGATGCGATAAA 350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 283 GAACAAAATCAAGTTTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTCGATGCGATAAA 332 my_vip3Aa35 351 TACGATGCTTCGGGTATATCTACCTAAAATTACCTCTATGTTGAGTGATG 400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 333 TACGATGCTTCGGGTATATCTACCTAAAATTACCTCTATGTTGAGTGATG 382 my_vip3Aa35 401 TAATGAAACAAAATTATGCGCTAAGTCTGCAAATAGAATACTTAAGTAAA 450 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 383 TAATGAAACAAAATTATGCGCTAAGTCTGCAAATAGAATACTTAAGTAAA 432 my_vip3Aa35 451 CAATTGCAAGAGATTTCTGATAAGTTGGATATTATTAATGTAAATGTACT 500 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 433 CAATTGCAAGAGATTTCTGATAAGTTGGATATTATTAATGTAAATGTACT 482 my_vip3Aa35 501 TATTAACTCTACACTTACTGAAATTACACCTGCGTATCAAAGGATTAAAT 550 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 483 TATTAACTCTACACTTACTGAAATTACACCTGCGTATCAAAGGATTAAAT 532 my_vip3Aa35 551 ATGTGAACGAAAAATTTGAGGAATTAACTTTTGCTACAGAAACTAGTTCA 600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 533 ATGTGAACGAAAAATTTGAGGAATTAACTTTTGCTACAGAAACTAGTTCA 582 my_vip3Aa35 601 AAAGTAAAAAAGGATGGCTCTCCTGCAGATATTCTTGATGAGTTAACTGA 650 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 583 AAAGTAAAAAAGGATGGCTCTCCTGCAGATATTCTTGATGAGTTAACTGA 632 my_vip3Aa35 651 GTTAACTGAACTAGCGAAAAGTGTAACAAAAAATGATGTGGATGGTTTTG 700 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 633 GTTAACTGAACTAGCGAAAAGTGTAACAAAAAATGATGTGGATGGTTTTG 682 my_vip3Aa35 701 AATTTTACCTTAATACATTCCACGATGTAATGGTAGGAAATAATTTATTC 750 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 683 AATTTTACCTTAATACATTCCACGATGTAATGGTAGGAAATAATTTATTC 732 my_vip3Aa35 751 GGGCGTTCAGCTTTAAAAACTGCATCGGAATTAATTACTAAAGAAAATGT 800 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 733 GGGCGTTCAGCTTTAAAAACTGCATCGGAATTAATTACTAAAGAAAATGT 782 my_vip3Aa35 801 GAAAACAAGTGGCAGTGAGGTCGGAAATGTTTATAACTTCTTAATTGTAT 850 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 783 GAAAACAAGTGGCAGTGAGGTCGGAAATGTTTATAACTTCTTAATTGTAT 832 my_vip3Aa35 851 TAACAGCTCTGCAAGCAAAAGCTTTTCTTACTTTAACAACATGCCGAAAA 900 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 833 TAACAGCTCTGCAAGCAAAAGCTTTTCTTACTTTAACAACATGCCGAAAA 882 my_vip3Aa35 901 TTATTAGGCTTAGCAGATATTGATTATACTTCTATTATGAATGAACATTT 950 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 883 TTATTAGGCTTAGCAGATATTGATTATACTTCTATTATGAATGAACATTT 932 my_vip3Aa35 951 AAATAAGGAAAAAGAGGAATTTAGAGTAAACATCCTCCCTACACTTTCTA 1000 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 933 AAATAAGGAAAAAGAGGAATTTAGAGTAAACATCCTCCCTACACTTTCTA 982 my_vip3Aa35 1001 ATACTTTTTCTAATCCTAATTATGCAAAAGTTAAAGGAAGTGATGAAGAT 1050
125
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 983 ATACTTTTTCTAATCCTAATTATGCAAAAGTTAAAGGAAGTGATGAAGAT 1032 my_vip3Aa35 1051 GCAAAGATGATTGTGGAAGCTAAACCAGGACATGCATTGGTTGGGTTTGA 1100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1033 GCAAAGATGATTGTGGAAGCTAAACCAGGACATGCATTGGTTGGGTTTGA 1082 my_vip3Aa35 1101 AATTAGTAATGATTCAATTACAGTATTAAAAGTATATGAGGCTAAGCTAA 1150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1083 AATTAGTAATGATTCAATTACAGTATTAAAAGTATATGAGGCTAAGCTAA 1132 my_vip3Aa35 1151 AACAAAATTATCAAGTTGATAAGGATTCCTTATCGGAAGTTATTTATGGT 1200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1133 AACAAAATTATCAAGTTGATAAGGATTCCTTATCGGAAGTTATTTATGGT 1182 my_vip3Aa35 1201 GATATGGATAAATTATTGTGCCCAGATCAATCTGAACAAATCTATTATAC 1250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1183 GATATGGATAAATTATTGTGCCCAGATCAATCTGAACAAATCTATTATAC 1232 my_vip3Aa35 1251 AAATAACATAGTATTTCCAAATGAATATGTAATTACTAAAATTGATTTTA 1300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1233 AAATAACATAGTATTTCCAAATGAATATGTAATTACTAAAATTGATTTTA 1282 my_vip3Aa35 1301 CTAAAAAAATGAAAACTTTAAGATATGAGGTAACAGCGAATTTTTATGAT 1350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1283 CTAAAAAAATGAAAACTTTAAGATATGAGGTAACAGCGAATTTTTATGAT 1332 my_vip3Aa35 1351 TCTTCTACAGGAGAAATTGACTTAAATAAGAAAAAAGTAGAATCAAGTGA 1400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1333 TCTTCTACAGGAGAAATTGACTTAAATAAGAAAAAAGTAGAATCAAGTGA 1382 my_vip3Aa35 1401 AGCGGAGTATAGAACGTTAAGTGCTAATGATGATGGAGTGTATATGCCGT 1450 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1383 AGCGGAGTATAGAACGTTAAGTGCTAATGATGATGGAGTGTATATGCCGT 1432 my_vip3Aa35 1451 TAGGTGTCATCAGTGAAACATTTTTGACTCCGATTAATGGGTTTGGCCTC 1500 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1433 TAGGTGTCATCAGTGAAACATTTTTGACTCCGATTAATGGGTTTGGCCTC 1482 my_vip3Aa35 1501 CAAGCTGATGAAAATTCAAGATTAATTACTTTAACATGTAAATCATATTT 1550 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1483 CAAGCTGATGAAAATTCAAGATTAATTACTTTAACATGTAAATCATATTT 1532 my_vip3Aa35 1551 AAGAGAACTACTGCTAGCAACAGACTTAAGCAATAAAGAAACTAAATTGA 1600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1533 AAGAGAACTACTGCTAGCAACAGACTTAAGCAATAAAGAAACTAAATTGA 1582 my_vip3Aa35 1601 TCGTCCCGCCAAGTGGTTTTATTAAAAATATTGTAGAGAACGGGTCCATA 1650 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1583 TCGTCCCGCCAAGTGGTTTTATTAAAAATATTGTAGAGAACGGGTCCATA 1632 my_vip3Aa35 1651 GAAGAGGACAATTTAGAGCCGTGGAAAGCAAATAATAAGAATGCGTATGT 1700 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1633 GAAGAGGACAATTTAGAGCCGTGGAAAGCAAATAATAAGAATGCGTATGT 1682 my_vip3Aa35 1701 AGATCATACAGGCGGAGTGAATGGAACTAAAGCTTTATATGTTCATAAcG 1750 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||.| GU733921.1 1683 AGATCATACAGGCGGAGTGAATGGAACTAAAGCTTTATATGTTCATAAGG 1732 my_vip3Aa35 1751 ACGGAGGAATTTCACAATTTATTGGAGATAAGTTAAAACCGAAAACTGAG 1800 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1733 ACGGAGGAATTTCACAATTTATTGGAGATAAGTTAAAACCGAAAACTGAG 1782 my_vip3Aa35 1801 TATGTAATCCAATATACTGTTAAAGGAAAACCTTCTATTCATTTAAAAGA 1850 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1783 TATGTAATCCAATATACTGTTAAAGGAAAACCTTCTATTCATTTAAAAGA 1832 my_vip3Aa35 1851 TGAAAATACTGGATATATTCATTATGAAGATACAAATAATAATTTAGAAG 1900
126
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1833 TGAAAATACTGGATATATTCATTATGAAGATACAAATAATAATTTAGAAG 1882 my_vip3Aa35 1901 ATTATCAAACTATTACTAAACGTTTTACTACAGGAACTGATTTAAAGGGA 1950 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1883 ATTATCAAACTATTACTAAACGTTTTACTACAGGAACTGATTTAAAGGGA 1932 my_vip3Aa35 1951 GTGTATTTAATTTTAAAAAGTCAAAATGGAGATGAAGCTTGGGGAGATAA 2000 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1933 GTGTATTTAATTTTAAAAAGTCAAAATGGAGATGAAGCTTGGGGAGATAA 1982 my_vip3Aa35 2001 CTTTATTATTTTGGAAATTAGTCCTTCTGAAAAGTTATTAAGTCCAGAAT 2050 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 1983 CTTTATTATTTTGGAAATTAGTCCTTCTGAAAAGTTATTAAGTCCAGAAT 2032 my_vip3Aa35 2051 TAATTAATACAAATAATTGGACGAGTACGGGATCAACTAATATTAGCGGT 2100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 2033 TAATTAATACAAATAATTGGACGAGTACGGGATCAACTAATATTAGCGGT 2082 my_vip3Aa35 2101 AATACACTCACTCTTTATCAGGGAGGACGAGGAATTCTAAAACAAAACCT 2150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 2083 AATACACTCACTCTTTATCAGGGAGGACGAGGAATTCTAAAACAAAACCT 2132 my_vip3Aa35 2151 TCAATTAGATAGTTTTTCAACTTATAGAGTGTATTTTTCTGTGTCCGGAG 2200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 2133 TCAATTAGATAGTTTTTCAACTTATAGAGTGTATTTTTCTGTGTCCGGAG 2182 my_vip3Aa35 2201 ATGCTAATGTAAGGATTAGAAATTcTAGGGAAGTGTTATTTGAAAAAAGA 2250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 2183 ATGCTAATGTAAGGATTAGAAATTCTAGGGAAGTGTTATTTGAAAAAAGA 2232 my_vip3Aa35 2251 TATATGAGCGGTGCTAAAGATGTTTCTGAAATTTTCACTACAAAATTGGG 2300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 2233 TATATGAGCGGTGCTAAAGATGTTTCTGAAATTTTCACTACAAAATTGGG 2282 my_vip3Aa35 2301 AAAAGATAACTTTTATATAGAGCTTTCTCAAGGGAATAATTTAAATGGTG 2350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 2283 AAAAGATAACTTTTATATAGAGCTTTCTCAAGGGAATAATTTAAATGGTG 2332 my_vip3Aa35 2351 GCCCTATTGTCAAGTTTTCCGATGTCTCTATTAAGTAA 2388 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| GU733921.1 2333 GCCCTATTGTCAAGTTTTCCGATGTCTCTATTAAGTAA 2370
The derived amino acid sequence from vip3Aa35 >vip3Aa35_amino acid (795 amino acids) MHHHHHHNKNNTKLSTRALPSFIDYFNGIYGFATGIKDIMNMIFKTDTGGDLTLDEILKNQQLLNDISGKLDGVNGSLNDLIAQGNLNTELSKEILKIANEQNQVLNDVNNKLDAINTMLRVYLPKITSMLSDVMKQNYALSLQIEYLSKQLQEISDKLDIINVNVLINSTLTEITPAYQRIKYVNEKFEELTFATETSSKVKKDGSPADILDELTELTELAKSVTKNDVDGFEFYLNTFHDVMVGNNLFGRSALKTASELITKENVKTSGSEVGNVYNFLIVLTALQAKAFLTLTTCRKLLGLADIDYTSIMNEHLNKEKEEFRVNILPTLSNTFSNPNYAKVKGSDEDAKMIVEAKPGHALVGFEISNDSITVLKVYEAKLKQNYQVDKDSLSEVIYGDMDKLLCPDQSEQIYYTNNIVFPNEYVITKIDFTKKMKTLRYEVTANFYDSSTGEIDLNKKKVESSEAEYRTLSANDDGVYMPLGVISETFLTPINGFGLQADENSRLITLTCKSYLRELLLATDLSNKETKLIVPPSGFIKNIVENGSIEEDNLEPWKANNKNAYVDHTGGVNGTKALYVHNDGGISQFIGDKLKPKTEYVIQYTVKGKPSIHLKDENTGYIHYEDTNNNLEDYQTITKRFTTGTDLKGVYLILKSQNGDEAWGDNFIILEISPSEKLLSPELINTNNWTSTGSTNISGNTLTLYQGGRGILKQNLQLDSFSTYRVYFSVSGDANVRIRNSREVLFEKRYMSGAKDVSEIFTTKLGKDNFYIELSQGNNLNGGPIVKFSDVSIK*
127
Group 2: vip3Af
>vip3Af_nucleotide ATGCATCATCACCACCATCACAATATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAGGGCCCTACCGAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCACTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAATATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGTAATCTAACCTTAGACGAAATCCTAAAGAATCAGCAGTTACTAAATGAGATTTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTAAATGGGAGCTTAAATGATCTTATCGCACAGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAGGAAATCTTAAAAATTGCAAATGAACAGAATCAAGTCTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTCGATGCGATAAATACGATGCTTCATATATATCTACCTAAAATTACATCTATGTTAAGTGATGTAATGAAGCAAAATTATGCGCTAAGTCTGCAAATAGAATACTTAAGTAAGCAATTGCAAGAAATTTCTGATAAATTAGATATTATTAACGTAAATGTTCTTATTAACTCTACACTTACTGAAATTACACCTGCATATCAACGGATTAAATATGTGAATGAAAAATTTGAAGAATTAACTTTTGCTACAGAAACCACTTTAAAAGTAAAAAAGGATAGCTCGCCTGCTGATATTCTTGATGAGTTAACTGAATTAACTGAACTAGCGAAAAGTGTTACAAAAAATGACGTTGATGGTTTTGAATTTTACCTTAATACATTCCACGATGTAATGGTAGGAAATAATTTATTCGGGCGTTCAGCTTTAAAAACTGCTTCAGAATTAATTGCTAAAGAAAATGTGAAAACAAGTGGCAGTGAAGTAGGAAATGTTTATAATTTCTTAATTGTATTAACAGCTCTACAAGCAAAAGCTTTTCTTACTTTAACAACATGCCGAAAATTATTAGGCTTAGCAGATATTGATTATACTTCTATTATGAATGAACATTTAAATAAGGAAAAAGAGGAATTTAGAGTAAACATCCTTCCTACACTTTCTAATACTTTTTCTAATCCTAATTATGCAAAAGTTAAAGGAAGTGATGAAGATGCAAAGATGATTGTGGAAGCTAAACCAGGACATGCATTGGTTGGGTTTGAAATGAGCAATGATTCAATCACAGTATTAAAAGTATATGAGGCTAAGCTAAAACAAAATTATCAAGTTGATAAGGATTCCTTATCGGAGGTTATTTATGGTGATACGGATAAATTATTTTGTCCAGATCAATCTGAACAAATATATTATACAAATAACATAGTATTCCCAAATGAATATGTAATTACTAAAATTGATTTCACTAAAAAAATGAAAACTTTAAGATATGAGGTAACAGCGAATTTTTATGATTCTTCTACAGGAGAAATTGACTTAAATAAGAAAAAAGTAGAATCAAGTGAAGCGGAGTATAGAACGTTAAGTGCTAATGATGATGGAGTGTATATGCCATTAGGTGTCATCAGTGAAACATTTTTGACTCCGATAAATGGGTTTGGCCTCCAAGCTGATGAAAATTCAAGATTAATTACTTTAACATGTAAATCATATTTAAGAGAACTACTGCTAGCAACAGACTTAAGCAATAAAGAAACTAAATTGATCGTCCCACCAAGTGGTTTTATTAGCAATATTGTAGAGAACGGGTCCATAGAAGAGGACAATTTAGAGCCGTGGAAAGCAAATAATAAGAATGCGTATGTAGATCATACAGGCGGAGTGAATGGAACTAAAGCTTTATATGTTCATAAGGACGGAGGATTTTCACAATTTATTGGAGATAAGTTAAAACCGAAAACTGAGTATGTAATCCAATATACTGTTAAAGGAAAACCTTCTATTCATTTAAAAGATGAAAATACTGGATATATTCATTATGAAGATACAAATAATAATTTAAAAGATTATCAAACTATTACTAAACGTTTTACTACAGGAACTGATTTAAAGGGAGTGTATTTAATTTTAAAAAGTCAAAATGGAGATGAAGCTTGGGGAGATAAATTTACAATTTTAGAAATTAAGCCTGCGGAGGATTTATTAAGCCCAGAATTAATTAATCCGAATTCTTGGATTACGACTCCAGGGGCTAGCATTTCAGGAAATAAACTTTTCATTAACTTGGGGACAAATGGGACCTTTAGACAAAGTCTTTCATTAAACAGTTATTCAACTTATAGTATAAGCTTTACTGCATCAGGACCATTTAATGTGACGGTAAGAAATTCTAGGGAAGTATTATTTGAACGAAGCAACCTTATGTCTTCAACTAGTCATATTTCTGGGACATTCAAAACTGAATCCAATAATACCGGATTATATGTAGAACTTTCCCGTCGCTCTGGTGGTGGTGGTCATATATCATTTGAAAACGTTTCTATTAAATAA Alignment of vip3Af with reference AJ872070.1 my_vip3Af 1 ATGCATCATCACCACCATCACAATATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAG 50 ||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1 ATG------------------AATATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAG 32 my_vip3Af 51 GGCCCTACCGAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCA 100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 33 GGCCCTACCGAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCA 82 my_vip3Af 101 CTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAATATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGT 150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 83 CTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAATATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGT 132 my_vip3Af 151 AATCTAACCTTAGACGAAATCCTAAAGAATCAGCAGTTACTAAATGAGAT 200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 133 AATCTAACCTTAGACGAAATCCTAAAGAATCAGCAGTTACTAAATGAGAT 182 my_vip3Af 201 TTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTAAATGGGAGCTTAAATGATCTTATCGCAC 250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 183 TTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTAAATGGGAGCTTAAATGATCTTATCGCAC 232 my_vip3Af 251 AGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAGGAAATCTTAAAAATTGCAAAT 300 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
128
AJ872070.1 233 AGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAGGAAATCTTAAAAATTGCAAAT 282 my_vip3Af 301 GAACAGAATCAAGTCTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTCGATGCGATAAA 350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 283 GAACAGAATCAAGTCTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTCGATGCGATAAA 332 my_vip3Af 351 TACGATGCTTCATATATATCTACCTAAAATTACATCTATGTTAAGTGATG 400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 333 TACGATGCTTCATATATATCTACCTAAAATTACATCTATGTTAAGTGATG 382 my_vip3Af 401 TAATGAAGCAAAATTATGCGCTAAGTCTGCAAATAGAATACTTAAGTAAG 450 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 383 TAATGAAGCAAAATTATGCGCTAAGTCTGCAAATAGAATACTTAAGTAAG 432 my_vip3Af 451 CAATTGCAAGAAATTTCTGATAAATTAGATATTATTAACGTAAATGTTCT 500 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 433 CAATTGCAAGAAATTTCTGATAAATTAGATATTATTAACGTAAATGTTCT 482 my_vip3Af 501 TATTAACTCTACACTTACTGAAATTACACCTGCATATCAACGGATTAAAT 550 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 483 TATTAACTCTACACTTACTGAAATTACACCTGCATATCAACGGATTAAAT 532 my_vip3Af 551 ATGTGAATGAAAAATTTGAAGAATTAACTTTTGCTACAGAAACCACTTTA 600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 533 ATGTGAATGAAAAATTTGAAGAATTAACTTTTGCTACAGAAACCACTTTA 582 my_vip3Af 601 AAAGTAAAAAAGGATAGCTCGCCTGCTGATATTCTTGATGAGTTAACTGA 650 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 583 AAAGTAAAAAAGGATAGCTCGCCTGCTGATATTCTTGATGAGTTAACTGA 632 my_vip3Af 651 ATTAACTGAACTAGCGAAAAGTGTTACAAAAAATGACGTTGATGGTTTTG 700 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 633 ATTAACTGAACTAGCGAAAAGTGTTACAAAAAATGACGTTGATGGTTTTG 682 my_vip3Af 701 AATTTTACCTTAATACATTCCACGATGTAATGGTAGGAAATAATTTATTC 750 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 683 AATTTTACCTTAATACATTCCACGATGTAATGGTAGGAAATAATTTATTC 732 my_vip3Af 751 GGGCGTTCAGCTTTAAAAACTGCTTCAGAATTAATTGCTAAAGAAAATGT 800 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 733 GGGCGTTCAGCTTTAAAAACTGCTTCAGAATTAATTGCTAAAGAAAATGT 782 my_vip3Af 801 GAAAACAAGTGGCAGTGAAGTAGGAAATGTTTATAATTTCTTAATTGTAT 850 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 783 GAAAACAAGTGGCAGTGAAGTAGGAAATGTTTATAATTTCTTAATTGTAT 832 my_vip3Af 851 TAACAGCTCTACAAGCAAAAGCTTTTCTTACTTTAACAACATGCCGAAAA 900 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 833 TAACAGCTCTACAAGCAAAAGCTTTTCTTACTTTAACAACATGCCGAAAA 882 my_vip3Af 901 TTATTAGGCTTAGCAGATATTGATTATACTTCTATTATGAATGAACATTT 950 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 883 TTATTAGGCTTAGCAGATATTGATTATACTTCTATTATGAATGAACATTT 932 my_vip3Af 951 AAATAAGGAAAAAGAGGAATTTAGAGTAAACATCCTTCCTACACTTTCTA 1000 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 933 AAATAAGGAAAAAGAGGAATTTAGAGTAAACATCCTTCCTACACTTTCTA 982 my_vip3Af 1001 ATACTTTTTCTAATCCTAATTATGCAAAAGTTAAAGGAAGTGATGAAGAT 1050 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 983 ATACTTTTTCTAATCCTAATTATGCAAAAGTTAAAGGAAGTGATGAAGAT 1032 my_vip3Af 1051 GCAAAGATGATTGTGGAAGCTAAACCAGGACATGCATTGGTTGGGTTTGA 1100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1033 GCAAAGATGATTGTGGAAGCTAAACCAGGACATGCATTGGTTGGGTTTGA 1082 my_vip3Af 1101 AATGAGCAATGATTCAATCACAGTATTAAAAGTATATGAGGCTAAGCTAA 1150 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
129
AJ872070.1 1083 AATGAGCAATGATTCAATCACAGTATTAAAAGTATATGAGGCTAAGCTAA 1132 my_vip3Af 1151 AACAAAATTATCAAGTTGATAAGGATTCCTTATCGGAGGTTATTTATGGT 1200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1133 AACAAAATTATCAAGTTGATAAGGATTCCTTATCGGAGGTTATTTATGGT 1182 my_vip3Af 1201 GATACGGATAAATTATTTTGTCCAGATCAATCTGAACAAATATATTATAC 1250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1183 GATACGGATAAATTATTTTGTCCAGATCAATCTGAACAAATATATTATAC 1232 my_vip3Af 1251 AAATAACATAGTATTCCCAAATGAATATGTAATTACTAAAATTGATTTCA 1300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1233 AAATAACATAGTATTCCCAAATGAATATGTAATTACTAAAATTGATTTCA 1282 my_vip3Af 1301 CTAAAAAAATGAAAACTTTAAGATATGAGGTAACAGCGAATTTTTATGAT 1350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1283 CTAAAAAAATGAAAACTTTAAGATATGAGGTAACAGCGAATTTTTATGAT 1332 my_vip3Af 1351 TCTTCTACAGGAGAAATTGACTTAAATAAGAAAAAAGTAGAATCAAGTGA 1400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1333 TCTTCTACAGGAGAAATTGACTTAAATAAGAAAAAAGTAGAATCAAGTGA 1382 my_vip3Af 1401 AGCGGAGTATAGAACGTTAAGTGCTAATGATGATGGAGTGTATATGCCAT 1450 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1383 AGCGGAGTATAGAACGTTAAGTGCTAATGATGATGGAGTGTATATGCCAT 1432 my_vip3Af 1451 TAGGTGTCATCAGTGAAACATTTTTGACTCCGATAAATGGGTTTGGCCTC 1500 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1433 TAGGTGTCATCAGTGAAACATTTTTGACTCCGATAAATGGGTTTGGCCTC 1482 my_vip3Af 1501 CAAGCTGATGAAAATTCAAGATTAATTACTTTAACATGTAAATCATATTT 1550 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1483 CAAGCTGATGAAAATTCAAGATTAATTACTTTAACATGTAAATCATATTT 1532 my_vip3Af 1551 AAGAGAACTACTGCTAGCAACAGACTTAAGCAATAAAGAAACTAAATTGA 1600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1533 AAGAGAACTACTGCTAGCAACAGACTTAAGCAATAAAGAAACTAAATTGA 1582 my_vip3Af 1601 TCGTCCCACCAAGTGGTTTTATTAGCAATATTGTAGAGAACGGGTCCATA 1650 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1583 TCGTCCCACCAAGTGGTTTTATTAGCAATATTGTAGAGAACGGGTCCATA 1632 my_vip3Af 1651 GAAGAGGACAATTTAGAGCCGTGGAAAGCAAATAATAAGAATGCGTATGT 1700 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1633 GAAGAGGACAATTTAGAGCCGTGGAAAGCAAATAATAAGAATGCGTATGT 1682 my_vip3Af 1701 AGATCATACAGGCGGAGTGAATGGAACTAAAGCTTTATATGTTCATAAGG 1750 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1683 AGATCATACAGGCGGAGTGAATGGAACTAAAGCTTTATATGTTCATAAGG 1732 my_vip3Af 1751 ACGGAGGATTTTCACAATTTATTGGAGATAAGTTAAAACCGAAAACTGAG 1800 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1733 ACGGAGGATTTTCACAATTTATTGGAGATAAGTTAAAACCGAAAACTGAG 1782 my_vip3Af 1801 TATGTAATCCAATATACTGTTAAAGGAAAACCTTCTATTCATTTAAAAGA 1850 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1783 TATGTAATCCAATATACTGTTAAAGGAAAACCTTCTATTCATTTAAAAGA 1832 my_vip3Af 1851 TGAAAATACTGGATATATTCATTATGAAGATACAAATAATAATTTAAAAG 1900 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1833 TGAAAATACTGGATATATTCATTATGAAGATACAAATAATAATTTAAAAG 1882 my_vip3Af 1901 ATTATCAAACTATTACTAAACGTTTTACTACAGGAACTGATTTAAAGGGA 1950 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1883 ATTATCAAACTATTACTAAACGTTTTACTACAGGAACTGATTTAAAGGGA 1932 my_vip3Af 1951 GTGTATTTAATTTTAAAAAGTCAAAATGGAGATGAAGCTTGGGGAGATAA 2000 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
130
AJ872070.1 1933 GTGTATTTAATTTTAAAAAGTCAAAATGGAGATGAAGCTTGGGGAGATAA 1982 my_vip3Af 2001 ATTTACAATTTTAGAAATTAAGCCTGCGGAGGATTTATTAAGCCCAGAAT 2050 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 1983 ATTTACAATTTTAGAAATTAAGCCTGCGGAGGATTTATTAAGCCCAGAAT 2032 my_vip3Af 2051 TAATTAATCCGAATTCTTGGATTACGACTCCAGGGGCTAGCATTTCAGGA 2100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 2033 TAATTAATCCGAATTCTTGGATTACGACTCCAGGGGCTAGCATTTCAGGA 2082 my_vip3Af 2101 AATAAACTTTTCATTAACTTGGGGACAAATGGGACCTTTAGACAAAGTCT 2150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 2083 AATAAACTTTTCATTAACTTGGGGACAAATGGGACCTTTAGACAAAGTCT 2132 my_vip3Af 2151 TTCATTAAACAGTTATTCAACTTATAGTATAAGCTTTACTGCATCAGGAC 2200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 2133 TTCATTAAACAGTTATTCAACTTATAGTATAAGCTTTACTGCATCAGGAC 2182 my_vip3Af 2201 CATTTAATGTGACGGTAAGAAATTCTAGGGAAGTATTATTTGAACGAAGC 2250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 2183 CATTTAATGTGACGGTAAGAAATTCTAGGGAAGTATTATTTGAACGAAGC 2232 my_vip3Af 2251 AACCTTATGTCTTCAACTAGTCATATTTCTGGGACATTCAAAACTGAATC 2300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 2233 AACCTTATGTCTTCAACTAGTCATATTTCTGGGACATTCAAAACTGAATC 2282 my_vip3Af 2301 CAATAATACCGGATTATATGTAGAACTTTCCCGTCGCTCTGGTGGTGGTG 2350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 2283 CAATAATACCGGATTATATGTAGAACTTTCCCGTCGCTCTGGTGGTGGTG 2332 my_vip3Af 2351 GTCATATATCATTTGAAAACGTTTCTATTAAATAA 2385 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AJ872070.1 2333 GTCATATATCATTTGAAAACGTTTCTATTAAATAA 2367
The derived amino acid sequence from vip3Af >vip3Af_amino acid (794 amino acids) MHHHHHHNMNNTKLNARALPSFIDYFNGIYGFATGIKDIMNMIFKTDTGGNLTLDEILKNQQLLNEISGKLDGVNGSLNDLIAQGNLNTELSKEILKIANEQNQVLNDVNNKLDAINTMLHIYLPKITSMLSDVMKQNYALSLQIEYLSKQLQEISDKLDIINVNVLINSTLTEITPAYQRIKYVNEKFEELTFATETTLKVKKDSSPADILDELTELTELAKSVTKNDVDGFEFYLNTFHDVMVGNNLFGRSALKTASELIAKENVKTSGSEVGNVYNFLIVLTALQAKAFLTLTTCRKLLGLADIDYTSIMNEHLNKEKEEFRVNILPTLSNTFSNPNYAKVKGSDEDAKMIVEAKPGHALVGFEMSNDSITVLKVYEAKLKQNYQVDKDSLSEVIYGDTDKLFCPDQSEQIYYTNNIVFPNEYVITKIDFTKKMKTLRYEVTANFYDSSTGEIDLNKKKVESSEAEYRTLSANDDGVYMPLGVISETFLTPINGFGLQADENSRLITLTCKSYLRELLLATDLSNKETKLIVPPSGFISNIVENGSIEEDNLEPWKANNKNAYVDHTGGVNGTKALYVHKDGGFSQFIGDKLKPKTEYVIQYTVKGKPSIHLKDENTGYIHYEDTNNNLKDYQTITKRFTTGTDLKGVYLILKSQNGDEAWGDKFTILEIKPAEDLLSPELINPNSWITTPGASISGNKLFINLGTNGTFRQSLSLNSYSTYSISFTASGPFNVTVRNSREVLFERSNLMSSTSHISGTFKTESNNTGLYVELSRRSGGGGHISFENVSIK*
Group 3: vip3Ag
>vip3Ag_nucleotide ATGCATCATCACCACCATCACAACAAGAATAATACTAAATTAAGCGCAAGGGCCTTACCGAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCACTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGAAATCTAACCCTAGACGAAATTTTAAAAAATCAGCAGTTATTAAATGAGATTTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTAAATGGGAGCTTAAACGATCTTATCGCACAGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAGGAAATCTTAAAAATTGCAAATGAGCAGAATCAAGTCTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTTAATGCGATAAATACAATGCTTCACATATATCTACCTAAAATTACATCTATGTTAAATGATGTAATGAAACAAAATTATGCACTAAGTCTGCAAATAGAATACCTAAGTAAACAATTGCAAGAAATTTCCGACAAGTTAGATGTCATTAACGTGAATGTACTTATTAACTCTACACTTACTGAAATTACACCTGCGTATCAACGGATGAAATATGTAAATGAAAAATTTGAAGATTTAACTTTTGCTACAGAAACCACTTTA
131
AAAGTAAAAAAGAATAGCTCCCCTGCAGATATTCTTGATGAGTTAACTGAGTTAACTGAACTAGCGAAAAGTGTAACAAAAAATGACGTGGATGGTTTTGAATTTTACCTTAATACATTCCACGATGTAATGGTAGGAAACAATTTATTCGGGCGTTCAGCTTTAAAAACTGCTTCGGAATTAATCGCTAAAGAAAATGTGAAAACAAGTGGCAGTGAGGTAGGAAATGTTTATAATTTCTTAATTGTATTAACAGCTCTGCAAGCAAAAGCTTTTCTTACTTTAACAACATGCCGGAAATTATTAGGCTTAGCAGATATTGATTATACTTTCATTATGAATGAACATTTAGATAAGGAAAAAGAGGAATTTAGAGTAAATATCCTTCCTACACTTTCTAATACTTTTTCTAATCCTAACTATGCAAAAGCTAAAGGAAGCAATGAAGATGCAAAGATAATTGTGGAAGCTAAACCAGGATATGCTTTGGTTGGATTTGAAATGAGCAATGATTCAATCACAGTATTAAAAGCATATCAGGCTAAGCTAAAACAAGATTATCAAGTTGATAAAGATTCGTTATCAGAAATTGTCTATGGTGATATGGATAAATTATTGTGCCCGGATCAATCTGAACAAATATATTATACAAATAACATTGCTTTTCCCAATGAATATGTAATTACTAAAATTACTTTTACTAAAAAAATGAATAGTTTAAGATATGAGGCAACAGCTAATTTTTATGATTCTTCTACAGGGGATATTGATCTAAATAAGACAAAAGTAGAATCAAGTGAAGCAGAGTATAGTACGCTAAGTGCTAGTACTGATGGAGTCTATATGCCGTTAGGTATTATCAGTGAAACATTTTTGACTCCAATTAATGGGTTTGGAATCGTAGTCGATGAAAATTCAAAATTAGTAAATTTAACATGTAAATCATATTTAAGAGAGGTATTATTAGCAACAGACTTAAGTAATAAAGAAACTAAATTGATTGTCCCACCTATTGGTTTTATTAGCAATATTGTAGAAAATGGGAACTTAGAGGGAGAAAACTTAGAGCCGTGGAAAGCAAATAACAAAAATGCGTATGTAGATCATACAGGCGGCGTAAATGGAACTAAAGCTTTATATGTTCATAAGGATGGTGAGTTTTCACAATTTATTGGAGATAAGTTGAAATCGAAAACAGAATATGTAATTCAATATATTGTAAAGGGAAAAGCTTCTATTCTTTTGAAAGATGAAAAAAATGGTGATTGCATTTATGAAGATACAAATAATGGTTTAGAAGATTTTCAAACCATTACTAAAAGTTTTATTACAGGAACGGATTCTTCAGGAGTTCATTTAATATTTAATAGTCAAAATGGCGATGAAGCATTTGGGGAAAACTTTACTATTTCAGAAATTAGGCTTTCCGAAGATTTATTAAGTCCAGAATTGATAAATTCAGATGCTTGGGTTGGATCTCAGGGAACTTGGATCTCAGGAAATTCACTCACTATTAATAGTAATGTGAATGGAACTTTTCGACAAAACCTTTCGTTAGAAAGCTATTCAACTTATAGTATGAACTTTAATGTGAATGGATTTGCCAAGGTGACAGTAAGAAATTCCCGTGAAGTATTATTTGAAAAAAATTATCCGCAGCTTTCACCTAAAGATATTTCTGAAAAATTCACAACTGCAGCCAATAATACCGGGTTGTATGTAGAGCTTTCTCGTTTTACATCGGGTGGCGCTATAAATTTCCGAGATTTTTCAATTAAGTAA Alignment of vip3Ag with reference FJ556803.2 my_vip3Ag 1 ATGCATCATCACCACCATCACAACAAGAATAATACTAAATTAAGCGCAAG 50 ||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1 ATG------------------AACAAGAATAATACTAAATTAAGCGCAAG 32 my_vip3Ag 51 GGCCTTACCGAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCA 100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 33 GGCCTTACCGAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCA 82 my_vip3Ag 101 CTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGA 150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 83 CTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGA 132 my_vip3Ag 151 AATCTAACCCTAGACGAAATTTTAAAAAATCAGCAGTTATTAAATGAGAT 200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 133 AATCTAACCCTAGACGAAATTTTAAAAAATCAGCAGTTATTAAATGAGAT 182 my_vip3Ag 201 TTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTAAATGGGAGCTTAAACGATCTTATCGCAC 250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 183 TTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTAAATGGGAGCTTAAACGATCTTATCGCAC 232 my_vip3Ag 251 AGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAGGAAATCTTAAAAATTGCAAAT 300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 233 AGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAGGAAATCTTAAAAATTGCAAAT 282 my_vip3Ag 301 GAGCAGAATCAAGTCTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTTAATGCGATAAA 350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 283 GAGCAGAATCAAGTCTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTTAATGCGATAAA 332 my_vip3Ag 351 TACAATGCTTCACATATATCTACCTAAAATTACATCTATGTTAAATGATG 400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 333 TACAATGCTTCACATATATCTACCTAAAATTACATCTATGTTAAATGATG 382 my_vip3Ag 401 TAATGAAACAAAATTATGCACTAAGTCTGCAAATAGAATACCTAAGTAAA 450 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 383 TAATGAAACAAAATTATGCACTAAGTCTGCAAATAGAATACCTAAGTAAA 432
132
my_vip3Ag 451 CAATTGCAAGAAATTTCCGACAAGTTAGATGTCATTAACGTGAATGTACT 500 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 433 CAATTGCAAGAAATTTCCGACAAGTTAGATGTCATTAACGTGAATGTACT 482 my_vip3Ag 501 TATTAACTCTACACTTACTGAAATTACACCTGCGTATCAACGGATGAAAT 550 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 483 TATTAACTCTACACTTACTGAAATTACACCTGCGTATCAACGGATGAAAT 532 my_vip3Ag 551 ATGTAAATGAAAAATTTGAAGATTTAACTTTTGCTACAGAAACCACTTTA 600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 533 ATGTAAATGAAAAATTTGAAGATTTAACTTTTGCTACAGAAACCACTTTA 582 my_vip3Ag 601 AAAGTAAAAAAGAATAGCTCCCCTGCAGATATTCTTGATGAGTTAACTGA 650 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 583 AAAGTAAAAAAGAATAGCTCCCCTGCAGATATTCTTGATGAGTTAACTGA 632 my_vip3Ag 651 GTTAACTGAACTAGCGAAAAGTGTAACAAAAAATGACGTGGATGGTTTTG 700 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 633 GTTAACTGAACTAGCGAAAAGTGTAACAAAAAATGACGTGGATGGTTTTG 682 my_vip3Ag 701 AATTTTACCTTAATACATTCCACGATGTAATGGTAGGAAACAATTTATTC 750 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 683 AATTTTACCTTAATACATTCCACGATGTAATGGTAGGAAACAATTTATTC 732 my_vip3Ag 751 GGGCGTTCAGCTTTAAAAACTGCTTCGGAATTAATCGCTAAAGAAAATGT 800 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 733 GGGCGTTCAGCTTTAAAAACTGCTTCGGAATTAATCGCTAAAGAAAATGT 782 my_vip3Ag 801 GAAAACAAGTGGCAGTGAGGTAGGAAATGTTTATAATTTCTTAATTGTAT 850 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 783 GAAAACAAGTGGCAGTGAGGTAGGAAATGTTTATAATTTCTTAATTGTAT 832 my_vip3Ag 851 TAACAGCTCTGCAAGCAAAAGCTTTTCTTACTTTAACAACATGCCGGAAA 900 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 833 TAACAGCTCTGCAAGCAAAAGCTTTTCTTACTTTAACAACATGCCGGAAA 882 my_vip3Ag 901 TTATTAGGCTTAGCAGATATTGATTATACTTTCATTATGAATGAACATTT 950 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 883 TTATTAGGCTTAGCAGATATTGATTATACTTTCATTATGAATGAACATTT 932 my_vip3Ag 951 AGATAAGGAAAAAGAGGAATTTAGAGTAAATATCCTTCCTACACTTTCTA 1000 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 933 AGATAAGGAAAAAGAGGAATTTAGAGTAAATATCCTTCCTACACTTTCTA 982 my_vip3Ag 1001 ATACTTTTTCTAATCCTAACTATGCAAAAGCTAAAGGAAGCAATGAAGAT 1050 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 983 ATACTTTTTCTAATCCTAACTATGCAAAAGCTAAAGGAAGCAATGAAGAT 1032 my_vip3Ag 1051 GCAAAGATAATTGTGGAAGCTAAACCAGGATATGCTTTGGTTGGATTTGA 1100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1033 GCAAAGATAATTGTGGAAGCTAAACCAGGATATGCTTTGGTTGGATTTGA 1082 my_vip3Ag 1101 AATGAGCAATGATTCAATCACAGTATTAAAAGCATATCAGGCTAAGCTAA 1150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1083 AATGAGCAATGATTCAATCACAGTATTAAAAGCATATCAGGCTAAGCTAA 1132 my_vip3Ag 1151 AACAAGATTATCAAGTTGATAAAGATTCGTTATCAGAAATTGTCTATGGT 1200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1133 AACAAGATTATCAAGTTGATAAAGATTCGTTATCAGAAATTGTCTATGGT 1182 my_vip3Ag 1201 GATATGGATAAATTATTGTGCCCGGATCAATCTGAACAAATATATTATAC 1250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1183 GATATGGATAAATTATTGTGCCCGGATCAATCTGAACAAATATATTATAC 1232 my_vip3Ag 1251 AAATAACATTGCTTTTCCCAATGAATATGTAATTACTAAAATTACTTTTA 1300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1233 AAATAACATTGCTTTTCCCAATGAATATGTAATTACTAAAATTACTTTTA 1282
133
my_vip3Ag 1301 CTAAAAAAATGAATAGTTTAAGATATGAGGCAACAGCTAATTTTTATGAT 1350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1283 CTAAAAAAATGAATAGTTTAAGATATGAGGCAACAGCTAATTTTTATGAT 1332 my_vip3Ag 1351 TCTTCTACAGGGGATATTGATCTAAATAAGACAAAAGTAGAATCAAGTGA 1400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1333 TCTTCTACAGGGGATATTGATCTAAATAAGACAAAAGTAGAATCAAGTGA 1382 my_vip3Ag 1401 AGCAGAGTATAGTACGCTAAGTGCTAGTACTGATGGAGTCTATATGCCGT 1450 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1383 AGCAGAGTATAGTACGCTAAGTGCTAGTACTGATGGAGTCTATATGCCGT 1432 my_vip3Ag 1451 TAGGTATTATCAGTGAAACATTTTTGACTCCAATTAATGGGTTTGGAATC 1500 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1433 TAGGTATTATCAGTGAAACATTTTTGACTCCAATTAATGGGTTTGGAATC 1482 my_vip3Ag 1501 GTAGTCGATGAAAATTCAAAATTAGTAAATTTAACATGTAAATCATATTT 1550 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1483 GTAGTCGATGAAAATTCAAAATTAGTAAATTTAACATGTAAATCATATTT 1532 my_vip3Ag 1551 AAGAGAGGTATTATTAGCAACAGACTTAAGTAATAAAGAAACTAAATTGA 1600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1533 AAGAGAGGTATTATTAGCAACAGACTTAAGTAATAAAGAAACTAAATTGA 1582 my_vip3Ag 1601 TTGTCCCACCTATTGGTTTTATTAGCAATATTGTAGAAAATGGGAACTTA 1650 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1583 TTGTCCCACCTATTGGTTTTATTAGCAATATTGTAGAAAATGGGAACTTA 1632 my_vip3Ag 1651 GAGGGAGAAAACTTAGAGCCGTGGAAAGCAAATAACAAAAATGCGTATGT 1700 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1633 GAGGGAGAAAACTTAGAGCCGTGGAAAGCAAATAACAAAAATGCGTATGT 1682 my_vip3Ag 1701 AGATCATACAGGCGGCGTAAATGGAACTAAAGCTTTATATGTTCATAAGG 1750 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1683 AGATCATACAGGCGGCGTAAATGGAACTAAAGCTTTATATGTTCATAAGG 1732 my_vip3Ag 1751 ATGGTGAGTTTTCACAATTTATTGGAGATAAGTTGAAATCGAAAACAGAA 1800 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1733 ATGGTGAGTTTTCACAATTTATTGGAGATAAGTTGAAATCGAAAACAGAA 1782 my_vip3Ag 1801 TATGTAATTCAATATATTGTAAAGGGAAAAGCTTCTATTCTTTTGAAAGA 1850 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1783 TATGTAATTCAATATATTGTAAAGGGAAAAGCTTCTATTCTTTTGAAAGA 1832 my_vip3Ag 1851 TGAAAAAAATGGTGATTGCATTTATGAAGATACAAATAATGGTTTAGAAG 1900 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1833 TGAAAAAAATGGTGATTGCATTTATGAAGATACAAATAATGGTTTAGAAG 1882 my_vip3Ag 1901 ATTTTCAAACCATTACTAAAAGTTTTATTACAGGAACGGATTCTTCAGGA 1950 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1883 ATTTTCAAACCATTACTAAAAGTTTTATTACAGGAACGGATTCTTCAGGA 1932 my_vip3Ag 1951 GTTCATTTAATATTTAATAGTCAAAATGGCGATGAAGCATTTGGGGAAAA 2000 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1933 GTTCATTTAATATTTAATAGTCAAAATGGCGATGAAGCATTTGGGGAAAA 1982 my_vip3Ag 2001 CTTTACTATTTCAGAAATTAGGCTTTCCGAAGATTTATTAAGTCCAGAAT 2050 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 1983 CTTTACTATTTCAGAAATTAGGCTTTCCGAAGATTTATTAAGTCCAGAAT 2032 my_vip3Ag 2051 TGATAAATTCAGATGCTTGGGTTGGATCTCAGGGAACTTGGATCTCAGGA 2100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 2033 TGATAAATTCAGATGCTTGGGTTGGATCTCAGGGAACTTGGATCTCAGGA 2082 my_vip3Ag 2101 AATTCACTCACTATTAATAGTAATGTGAATGGAACTTTTCGACAAAACCT 2150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 2083 AATTCACTCACTATTAATAGTAATGTGAATGGAACTTTTCGACAAAACCT 2132
134
my_vip3Ag 2151 TTCGTTAGAAAGCTATTCAACTTATAGTATGAACTTTAATGTGAATGGAT 2200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 2133 TTCGTTAGAAAGCTATTCAACTTATAGTATGAACTTTAATGTGAATGGAT 2182 my_vip3Ag 2201 TTGCCAAGGTGACAGTAAGAAATTCCCGTGAAGTATTATTTGAAAAAAAT 2250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 2183 TTGCCAAGGTGACAGTAAGAAATTCCCGTGAAGTATTATTTGAAAAAAAT 2232 my_vip3Ag 2251 TATCCGCAGCTTTCACCTAAAGATATTTCTGAAAAATTCACAACTGCAGC 2300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 2233 TATCCGCAGCTTTCACCTAAAGATATTTCTGAAAAATTCACAACTGCAGC 2282 my_vip3Ag 2301 CAATAATACCGGGTTGTATGTAGAGCTTTCTCGTTTTACATCGGGTGGCG 2350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 2283 CAATAATACCGGGTTGTATGTAGAGCTTTCTCGTTTTACATCGGGTGGCG 2332 my_vip3Ag 2351 CTATAAATTTCCGAGATTTTTCAATTAAGTAA 2382 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| FJ556803.2 2333 CTATAAATTTCCGAGATTTTTCAATTAAGTAA 2364
The derived amino acid sequence from vip3Ag >vip3Ag_amino acid (793 amino acids) MHHHHHHNKNNTKLSARALPSFIDYFNGIYGFATGIKDIMNMIFKTDTGGNLTLDEILKNQQLLNEISGKLDGVNGSLNDLIAQGNLNTELSKEILKIANEQNQVLNDVNNKLNAINTMLHIYLPKITSMLNDVMKQNYALSLQIEYLSKQLQEISDKLDVINVNVLINSTLTEITPAYQRMKYVNEKFEDLTFATETTLKVKKNSSPADILDELTELTELAKSVTKNDVDGFEFYLNTFHDVMVGNNLFGRSALKTASELIAKENVKTSGSEVGNVYNFLIVLTALQAKAFLTLTTCRKLLGLADIDYTFIMNEHLDKEKEEFRVNILPTLSNTFSNPNYAKAKGSNEDAKIIVEAKPGYALVGFEMSNDSITVLKAYQAKLKQDYQVDKDSLSEIVYGDMDKLLCPDQSEQIYYTNNIAFPNEYVITKITFTKKMNSLRYEATANFYDSSTGDIDLNKTKVESSEAEYSTLSASTDGVYMPLGIISETFLTPINGFGIVVDENSKLVNLTCKSYLREVLLATDLSNKETKLIVPPIGFISNIVENGNLEGENLEPWKANNKNAYVDHTGGVNGTKALYVHKDGEFSQFIGDKLKSKTEYVIQYIVKGKASILLKDEKNGDCIYEDTNNGLEDFQTITKSFITGTDSSGVHLIFNSQNGDEAFGENFTISEIRLSEDLLSPELINSDAWVGSQGTWISGNSLTINSNVNGTFRQNLSLESYSTYSMNFNVNGFAKVTVRNSREVLFEKNYPQLSPKDISEKFTTAANNTGLYVELSRFTSGGAINFRDFSIK*
Group 4: vip3Ca2
vip3Ca2_nucleotide ATGCATCATCACCACCATCACAACATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAGGGCCTTACCAAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCACTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGTGATCTAACCCTAGACGAAATTTTAAAGAATCAGCAGTTACTAAATGAAATTTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTAAATGGGAGCTTAAATGATCTTATCGCACAGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAGGAAATCTTAAAAATTGCAAATGAACAAAATCAAGTTTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTAGATGCGATAAATACGATGCTTAACATATATCTACCTAAAATTACATCTATGTTAAGCGATGTAATGAAACAAAATTATGCGCTAAGTCTGCAGATAGAATACCTAAGTAGACAGTTACAGGAAATTTCAGATAAGTTAGATGTTATTAATTTAAATGTTTTAATTAATTCTACTCTTACTGAAATCACACCTTCATATCAACGTATTAAATATGTAAATGAGAAATTTGATAAATTAACATTTGCCACAGAAAGCACTCTAAGAGCAAAACAAGGAATTTTTAACGAGGATAGTTTTGATAATAATACTCTTGAAAATTTAACTGATCTAGCTGAACTAGCTAAAAGTATAACCAAAAATGATGTGGATAGTTTCGAATTTTATCTTCACACATTTCATGATGTATTAATTGGAAATAATTTATTTGGACGATCGGCTTTAAAAACAGCTTCAGAATTAATTACTAAAGACGAGATAAAGACAAGTGGAAGTGAGATTGGAAAAGTTTATAGTTTCTTAATTGTGCTAACTTCTTTACAAGCTAAAGCCTTTCTCACTTTAACAACATGTAGAAAATTATTGGGCTTATCAGATATTGATTATACTTCTATTATGAATGAACATCTAAATAATGAAAAAAATGAATTTCGTGATAACATACTTCCTGCACTGTCGAATAAGTTTTCTAACCCTAGCTACGCAAAAACTATAGGTAGTGACAATTATGCAAAAGTTATTTTAGAATCTGAACCAGGTTATGCTTTAGTCGGATTCGAAATTATTAATGACCCAATCCCGGTATTAAAAGCGTATAAAGCAAAACTAAAACAAAATTATCAAGTTGATAATCAGTCGTTATCAGAGATTGTTTATTTAGATATCGATAAACTATTTTGTCCGGAAAATTCAGAACAAAAATATTATACTAAAAATCTGACATTTCCTGATGGCTATGTTATTACTAAAATTACCTTTGAAAAAAAACTGAACAACCTAATTTATGAAGCAACA
135
GCAAATTTTTATGACCCATCTACAGGAGATATTGACTTAAATAAGAAGCAAGTGGAATCTACTTTTCCTCAAACGGATTATATTACTATGGATATAGGTGATGATGATGGTATTTATATGCCGTTAGGCGTTATCAGTGAAACGTTTTTGACTCCTATTAATAGTTTTGGATTAGAAGTTGACGCGAAATCGAAAACATTAACCTTAAAATGTAAATCTTACCTGCGAGAATATTTATTAGAGTCCGATCTAAAAAATAAAGAAACAGGCTTGATTGCCCCGCCAAATGTTTTTATTAGTAATGTTGTGAAAAATTGGGATATAGAGGAAGATAGTCTAGAACCATGGGTAGCAAATAACAAAAATGCCTATGTTGATAATACAGGCGGTATAGAAAGATCTAAAGCCCTCTTTACTCAAGGTGACGGGGAATTCTCACAATTTATTGGTGATAAATTAAAACCTAATACAGATTATATTATTCAATATACTGTAAAAGGAAAACCAGCCATTTATTTAAAAAATAAAAGTACTGGATATATTACGTACGAGGATACAAACGGTAATTCTGAAGAATTTCAAACTATAGCTGTAAAATTCACTTCAGAAACTGATCTTTCACAAACTCATTTAGTTTTTAAAAGTCAAAATGGTTATGAGGCTTGGGGAGACAATTTTATTATTTTAGAAGCTAAGCTATTTGAAACTCCTGAAAGTCCAGAATTGATAAAATTTAATGATTGGGAAAGATTTGGTACTACTTACATTACAGGAAATGAGCTTAGAATCGATCATAGTCGTGGAGGTTATTTTAGACAATCTCTTAATATAGACAGTTATTCAACTTATGATTTGAGCTTTTCTTTTAGTGGATTATGGGCTAAGGTTATTGTGAAAAATTCCCGAGGGGTAGTATTGTTTGAAAAAGTGAAAAACAACGGTTCATCATATGAAGATATTAGTGAAAGTTTTACTACCGCATCAAATAAGGATGGATTTTTTATAGAACTAACAGCCGAAAGAACGAGCTCAACTTTCCATAGCTTTCGTGATATTTCTATTAAGGAAAAGATTGAATAA
Alignment of vip3Ca2 with reference JF916462.1 my_vip3Ca2 1 ATGCATCATCACCACCATCACAACATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAG 50 ||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1 ATG------------------AACATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAG 32 my_vip3Ca2 51 GGCCTTACCAAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCA 100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 33 GGCCTTACCAAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCA 82 my_vip3Ca2 101 CTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGT 150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 83 CTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGT 132 my_vip3Ca2 151 GATCTAACCCTAGACGAAATTTTAAAGAATCAGCAGTTACTAAATGAAAT 200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 133 GATCTAACCCTAGACGAAATTTTAAAGAATCAGCAGTTACTAAATGAAAT 182 my_vip3Ca2 201 TTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTAAATGGGAGCTTAAATGATCTTATCGCAC 250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 183 TTCTGGTAAATTGGATGGGGTAAATGGGAGCTTAAATGATCTTATCGCAC 232 my_vip3Ca2 251 AGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAGGAAATCTTAAAAATTGCAAAT 300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 233 AGGGAAACTTAAATACAGAATTATCTAAGGAAATCTTAAAAATTGCAAAT 282 my_vip3Ca2 301 GAACAAAATCAAGTTTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTAGATGCGATAAA 350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 283 GAACAAAATCAAGTTTTAAATGATGTTAATAACAAACTAGATGCGATAAA 332 my_vip3Ca2 351 TACGATGCTTAACATATATCTACCTAAAATTACATCTATGTTAAGCGATG 400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 333 TACGATGCTTAACATATATCTACCTAAAATTACATCTATGTTAAGCGATG 382 my_vip3Ca2 401 TAATGAAACAAAATTATGCGCTAAGTCTGCAGATAGAATACCTAAGTAGA 450 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 383 TAATGAAACAAAATTATGCGCTAAGTCTGCAGATAGAATACCTAAGTAGA 432 my_vip3Ca2 451 CAGTTACAGGAAATTTCAGATAAGTTAGATGTTATTAATTTAAATGTTTT 500 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 433 CAGTTACAGGAAATTTCAGATAAGTTAGATGTTATTAATTTAAATGTTTT 482 my_vip3Ca2 501 AATTAATTCTACTCTTACTGAAATCACACCTTCATATCAACGTATTAAAT 550 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 483 AATTAATTCTACTCTTACTGAAATCACACCTTCATATCAACGTATTAAAT 532
136
my_vip3Ca2 551 ATGTAAATGAGAAATTTGATAAATTAACATTTGCCACAGAAAGCACTCTA 600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 533 ATGTAAATGAGAAATTTGATAAATTAACATTTGCCACAGAAAGCACTCTA 582 my_vip3Ca2 601 AGAGCAAAACAAGGAATTTTTAACGAGGATAGTTTTGATAATAATACTCT 650 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 583 AGAGCAAAACAAGGAATTTTTAACGAGGATAGTTTTGATAATAATACTCT 632 my_vip3Ca2 651 TGAAAATTTAACTGATCTAGCTGAACTAGCTAAAAGTATAACCAAAAATG 700 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 633 TGAAAATTTAACTGATCTAGCTGAACTAGCTAAAAGTATAACCAAAAATG 682 my_vip3Ca2 701 ATGTGGATAGTTTCGAATTTTATCTTCACACATTTCATGATGTATTAATT 750 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 683 ATGTGGATAGTTTCGAATTTTATCTTCACACATTTCATGATGTATTAATT 732 my_vip3Ca2 751 GGAAATAATTTATTTGGACGATCGGCTTTAAAAACAGCTTCAGAATTAAT 800 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 733 GGAAATAATTTATTTGGACGATCGGCTTTAAAAACAGCTTCAGAATTAAT 782 my_vip3Ca2 801 TACTAAAGACGAGATAAAGACAAGTGGAAGTGAGATTGGAAAAGTTTATA 850 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 783 TACTAAAGACGAGATAAAGACAAGTGGAAGTGAGATTGGAAAAGTTTATA 832 my_vip3Ca2 851 GTTTCTTAATTGTGCTAACTTCTTTACAAGCTAAAGCCTTTCTCACTTTA 900 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 833 GTTTCTTAATTGTGCTAACTTCTTTACAAGCTAAAGCCTTTCTCACTTTA 882 my_vip3Ca2 901 ACAACATGTAGAAAATTATTGGGCTTATCAGATATTGATTATACTTCTAT 950 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 883 ACAACATGTAGAAAATTATTGGGCTTATCAGATATTGATTATACTTCTAT 932 my_vip3Ca2 951 TATGAATGAACATCTAAATAATGAAAAAAATGAATTTCGTGATAACATAC 1000 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 933 TATGAATGAACATCTAAATAATGAAAAAAATGAATTTCGTGATAACATAC 982 my_vip3Ca2 1001 TTCCTGCACTGTCGAATAAGTTTTCTAACCCTAGCTACGCAAAAACTATA 1050 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 983 TTCCTGCACTGTCGAATAAGTTTTCTAACCCTAGCTACGCAAAAACTATA 1032 my_vip3Ca2 1051 GGTAGTGACAATTATGCAAAAGTTATTTTAGAATCTGAACCAGGTTATGC 1100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1033 GGTAGTGACAATTATGCAAAAGTTATTTTAGAATCTGAACCAGGTTATGC 1082 my_vip3Ca2 1101 TTTAGTCGGATTCGAAATTATTAATGACCCAATCCCGGTATTAAAAGCGT 1150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1083 TTTAGTCGGATTCGAAATTATTAATGACCCAATCCCGGTATTAAAAGCGT 1132 my_vip3Ca2 1151 ATAAAGCAAAACTAAAACAAAATTATCAAGTTGATAATCAGTCGTTATCA 1200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1133 ATAAAGCAAAACTAAAACAAAATTATCAAGTTGATAATCAGTCGTTATCA 1182 my_vip3Ca2 1201 GAGATTGTTTATTTAGATATCGATAAACTATTTTGTCCGGAAAATTCAGA 1250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1183 GAGATTGTTTATTTAGATATCGATAAACTATTTTGTCCGGAAAATTCAGA 1232 my_vip3Ca2 1251 ACAAAAATATTATACTAAAAATCTGACATTTCCTGATGGCTATGTTATTA 1300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1233 ACAAAAATATTATACTAAAAATCTGACATTTCCTGATGGCTATGTTATTA 1282 my_vip3Ca2 1301 CTAAAATTACCTTTGAAAAAAAACTGAACAACCTAATTTATGAAGCAACA 1350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1283 CTAAAATTACCTTTGAAAAAAAACTGAACAACCTAATTTATGAAGCAACA 1332 my_vip3Ca2 1351 GCAAATTTTTATGACCCATCTACAGGAGATATTGACTTAAATAAGAAGCA 1400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1333 GCAAATTTTTATGACCCATCTACAGGAGATATTGACTTAAATAAGAAGCA 1382
137
my_vip3Ca2 1401 AGTGGAATCTACTTTTCCTCAAACGGATTATATTACTATGGATATAGGTG 1450 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1383 AGTGGAATCTACTTTTCCTCAAACGGATTATATTACTATGGATATAGGTG 1432 my_vip3Ca2 1451 ATGATGATGGTATTTATATGCCGTTAGGCGTTATCAGTGAAACGTTTTTG 1500 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1433 ATGATGATGGTATTTATATGCCGTTAGGCGTTATCAGTGAAACGTTTTTG 1482 my_vip3Ca2 1501 ACTCCTATTAATAGTTTTGGATTAGAAGTTGACGCGAAATCGAAAACATT 1550 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1483 ACTCCTATTAATAGTTTTGGATTAGAAGTTGACGCGAAATCGAAAACATT 1532 my_vip3Ca2 1551 AACCTTAAAATGTAAATCTTACCTGCGAGAATATTTATTAGAGTCCGATC 1600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1533 AACCTTAAAATGTAAATCTTACCTGCGAGAATATTTATTAGAGTCCGATC 1582 my_vip3Ca2 1601 TAAAAAATAAAGAAACAGGCTTGATTGCCCCGCCAAATGTTTTTATTAGT 1650 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1583 TAAAAAATAAAGAAACAGGCTTGATTGCCCCGCCAAATGTTTTTATTAGT 1632 my_vip3Ca2 1651 AATGTTGTGAAAAATTGGGATATAGAGGAAGATAGTCTAGAACCATGGGT 1700 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1633 AATGTTGTGAAAAATTGGGATATAGAGGAAGATAGTCTAGAACCATGGGT 1682 my_vip3Ca2 1701 AGCAAATAACAAAAATGCCTATGTTGATAATACAGGCGGTATAGAAAGAT 1750 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1683 AGCAAATAACAAAAATGCCTATGTTGATAATACAGGCGGTATAGAAAGAT 1732 my_vip3Ca2 1751 CTAAAGCCCTCTTTACTCAAGGTGACGGGGAATTCTCACAATTTATTGGT 1800 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1733 CTAAAGCCCTCTTTACTCAAGGTGACGGGGAATTCTCACAATTTATTGGT 1782 my_vip3Ca2 1801 GATAAATTAAAACCTAATACAGATTATATTATTCAATATACTGTAAAAGG 1850 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1783 GATAAATTAAAACCTAATACAGATTATATTATTCAATATACTGTAAAAGG 1832 my_vip3Ca2 1851 AAAACCAGCCATTTATTTAAAAAATAAAAGTACTGGATATATTACGTACG 1900 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1833 AAAACCAGCCATTTATTTAAAAAATAAAAGTACTGGATATATTACGTACG 1882 my_vip3Ca2 1901 AGGATACAAACGGTAATTCTGAAGAATTTCAAACTATAGCTGTAAAATTC 1950 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1883 AGGATACAAACGGTAATTCTGAAGAATTTCAAACTATAGCTGTAAAATTC 1932 my_vip3Ca2 1951 ACTTCAGAAACTGATCTTTCACAAACTCATTTAGTTTTTAAAAGTCAAAA 2000 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1933 ACTTCAGAAACTGATCTTTCACAAACTCATTTAGTTTTTAAAAGTCAAAA 1982 my_vip3Ca2 2001 TGGTTATGAGGCTTGGGGAGACAATTTTATTATTTTAGAAGCTAAGCTAT 2050 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 1983 TGGTTATGAGGCTTGGGGAGACAATTTTATTATTTTAGAAGCTAAGCTAT 2032 my_vip3Ca2 2051 TTGAAACTCCTGAAAGTCCAGAATTGATAAAATTTAATGATTGGGAAAGA 2100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 2033 TTGAAACTCCTGAAAGTCCAGAATTGATAAAATTTAATGATTGGGAAAGA 2082 my_vip3Ca2 2101 TTTGGTACTACTTACATTACAGGAAATGAGCTTAGAATCGATCATAGTCG 2150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 2083 TTTGGTACTACTTACATTACAGGAAATGAGCTTAGAATCGATCATAGTCG 2132 my_vip3Ca2 2151 TGGAGGTTATTTTAGACAATCTCTTAATATAGACAGTTATTCAACTTATG 2200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 2133 TGGAGGTTATTTTAGACAATCTCTTAATATAGACAGTTATTCAACTTATG 2182 my_vip3Ca2 2201 ATTTGAGCTTTTCTTTTAGTGGATTATGGGCTAAGGTTATTGTGAAAAAT 2250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 2183 ATTTGAGCTTTTCTTTTAGTGGATTATGGGCTAAGGTTATTGTGAAAAAT 2232
138
my_vip3Ca2 2251 TCCCGAGGGGTAGTATTGTTTGAAAAAGTGAAAAACAACGGTTCATCATA 2300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 2233 TCCCGAGGGGTAGTATTGTTTGAAAAAGTGAAAAACAACGGTTCATCATA 2282 my_vip3Ca2 2301 TGAAGATATTAGTGAAAGTTTTACTACCGCATCAAATAAGGATGGATTTT 2350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 2283 TGAAGATATTAGTGAAAGTTTTACTACCGCATCAAATAAGGATGGATTTT 2332 my_vip3Ca2 2351 TTATAGAACTAACAGCCGAAAGAACGAGCTCAACTTTCCATAGCTTTCGT 2400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 2333 TTATAGAACTAACAGCCGAAAGAACGAGCTCAACTTTCCATAGCTTTCGT 2382 my_vip3Ca2 2401 GATATTTCTATTAAGGAAAAGATTGAATAA 2430 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| JF916462.1 2383 GATATTTCTATTAAGGAAAAGATTGAATAA 2412
The derived amino acid sequence from vip3Ca2 >vip3Ca2_amino acid (809 amino acids) MHHHHHHNMNNTKLNARALPSFIDYFNGIYGFATGIKDIMNMIFKTDTGGDLTLDEILKNQQLLNEISGKLDGVNGSLNDLIAQGNLNTELSKEILKIANEQNQVLNDVNNKLDAINTMLNIYLPKITSMLSDVMKQNYALSLQIEYLSRQLQEISDKLDVINLNVLINSTLTEITPSYQRIKYVNEKFDKLTFATESTLRAKQGIFNEDSFDNNTLENLTDLAELAKSITKNDVDSFEFYLHTFHDVLIGNNLFGRSALKTASELITKDEIKTSGSEIGKVYSFLIVLTSLQAKAFLTLTTCRKLLGLSDIDYTSIMNEHLNNEKNEFRDNILPALSNKFSNPSYAKTIGSDNYAKVILESEPGYALVGFEIINDPIPVLKAYKAKLKQNYQVDNQSLSEIVYLDIDKLFCPENSEQKYYTKNLTFPDGYVITKITFEKKLNNLIYEATANFYDPSTGDIDLNKKQVESTFPQTDYITMDIGDDDGIYMPLGVISETFLTPINSFGLEVDAKSKTLTLKCKSYLREYLLESDLKNKETGLIAPPNVFISNVVKNWDIEEDSLEPWVANNKNAYVDNTGGIERSKALFTQGDGEFSQFIGDKLKPNTDYIIQYTVKGKPAIYLKNKSTGYITYEDTNGNSEEFQTIAVKFTSETDLSQTHLVFKSQNGYEAWGDNFIILEAKLFETPESPELIKFNDWERFGTTYITGNELRIDHSRGGYFRQSLNIDSYSTYDLSFSFSGLWAKVIVKNSRGVVLFEKVKNNGSSYEDISESFTTASNKDGFFIELTAERTSSTFHSFRDISIKEKIE*
Group 5: vip3Ba1
>vip3Ba1_nucleotide ATGCATCATCACCACCATCACAACATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAGGGCCTTACCAAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCACTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGTGGTAATTTAACACTAGATGAAATTTTAAAGAATCAAGATTTATTAAATCAAATCTCAGATAAACTCGATGGAATTAATGGAGATTTAGGTGATCTTATTGCACAAGGGAATTTGAATTCAGAACTAACTAAGGAATTATTAAAAATCGCCAATGAGCAAAATCTGATGTTAAATAATGTTAATGCTCAACTTAATTCAATAAATGCAACACTTAATACCTATCTTCCAAAAATTACATCTATGCTAAATGAGGTAATGAAACAAAACTATGTTTTAAGTCTACAAATAGAATTTCTTAGTAAACAATTACAAGAGATTTCAGATAAACTTGATATTATCAATTTAAATGTATTAATTAACTCTACATTGACAGAGATTACGCCTGCTTATCAACGTATTAAATATGTAAACGATAAATTTGATGAATTGACTTCTACTGTAGAAAAAAATCCAAAAATTAATCAAGATAATTTTACTGAAGATGTTATTGATAATTTAACTGATCTAACTGAACTAGCAAGAAGTGTAACGAGAAATGATATGGATAGTTTTGAATTTTATATTAAAACTTTCCATGATGTGATGATAGGAAATAATTTATTCAGTCGTTCTGCATTAAAAACTGCTTCAGAATTAATTGCTAAGGAAAATATACACACTAGGGGAAGTGAAATTGGTAATGTCTACACTTTTATGATTGTTTTGACTTCCTTACAAGCAAAAGCGTTCCTAACTTTAACTACATGTCGTAAATTATTAGGATTAGCAGATATCGATTATACACAAATTATGAATGAAAATTTAGATAGAGAAAAAGAGGAATTTCGCTTAAATATTCTTCCTACACTTTCTAATGATTTTTCTAATCCTAATTATACAGAAACTTTAGGAAGTGATCTTGTAGATCCAATTGTTACGTTAGAAGCTGAGCCTGGTTATGCTTTAATAGGTTTTGAAATTCTCAATGATCCACTTCCAGTATTAAAAGTATATCAGGCAAAGCTAAAACCAAATTATCAAGTCGACAAAGAGTCGATTATGGAAAATATTTATGGGAACATCCATAAACTACTTTGTCCAAAACAACGTGAACAAAAATATTATATAAAAGACATGACATTCCCTGAAGGTTATGTAATCACCAAAATTGTTTTTGAAAAAAAATTGAATCTATTAGGATATGAAGTAACAGCAAATCTTTATGATCCTTTTACAGGAAGTATCGATTTGAATAAGACTATTCTAGAATCATGGAAAGAAGACTGCTGTGAAGAAGACTGCTGTGAAGAAGACTGCTGTGAAGAAGATTGCTGTGAGGAATTATATAAAATTATAGAGGCGGATACTAACGGTGTTTATATGCCTTTGGGTGTAATTAGTGAAACATTTTTAACACCAATCTATAGTTTTAAACTAATTATTGACGAAAAAACAAAGAAAATATCTTTAGCGGGTAAATCTTATTTACGTGAATCTTTACTAGCCACAGATTTAGTTAATAAAGAAACAAATTTAATTCCTTCACCTAATGGTTTCATTAGCAGTATTGTGCAAAATTGGCATATAACATCGGATAATATAGAGCCATGGAAAGCGAATAATAAAAATGCATATGTCGATAAGACGGATGCCATGGTGGGATTTAGCTCTTTATATACTCATAAGGATGGGGAATTCTTGCAATTTATTGGAGCTAAGTTAAAGGCTAAAACTGAGTATATCATT
139
CAATATACTGTAAAAGGGAATCCGGAAGTTTATTTAAAAAACAATAAAGATATCTGTTATGAGGATAAAACAAATAATTTTGACACGTTTCAAACTATAACTAAAAAATTCAATTCAGGAGTAGATCCATCCGAAATATATCTAGTTTTTAAAAATCAAATTGGATATGAAGCATGGGGAAATAACTTTATTATACTTGAAATTAAGTCGCTTGAAACCCTACCACAAATATTAAAACCTGAAAATTGGATTCCTTTGGGTAATGCTGAGATTAAAGAAGATGGAAAAATTGAGATTTCAGGTAATGGAAGCATGAATCAATATATTCAATTAGAACAGAATTCCAAATATCATCTAAGATTCTCTGTAAAAGGAAAAGGTAGAGTAACGATGCAAGCTCAAACGTCCCATATAAATGTACCAGCTACAAACGAAGAGGTTTCTATAATGATTGAAACTACACGCTTATACGGCGAAGGTATAATTAGCCTATTAAATGATGAAGTGGAGAATTCCGGGGTTATTTTTTCGGATGTATCTATAGTTAAAGAATAA Alignment of vip3Ba1 with reference AY823271.1
my_vip3Ba1 1 ATGCATCATCACCACCATCACAACATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAG 50 ||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1 ATG------------------AACATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAG 32 my_vip3Ba1 51 GGCCTTACCAAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCA 100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 33 GGCCTTACCAAGTTTTATTGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCA 82 my_vip3Ba1 101 CTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGT 150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 83 CTGGTATCAAAGACATTATGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGT 132 my_vip3Ba1 151 GGTAATTTAACACTAGATGAAATTTTAAAGAATCAAGATTTATTAAATCA 200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 133 GGTAATTTAACACTAGATGAAATTTTAAAGAATCAAGATTTATTAAATCA 182 my_vip3Ba1 201 AATCTCAGATAAACTCGATGGAATTAATGGAGATTTAGGTGATCTTATTG 250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 183 AATCTCAGATAAACTCGATGGAATTAATGGAGATTTAGGTGATCTTATTG 232 my_vip3Ba1 251 CACAAGGGAATTTGAATTCAGAACTAACTAAGGAATTATTAAAAATCGCC 300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 233 CACAAGGGAATTTGAATTCAGAACTAACTAAGGAATTATTAAAAATCGCC 282 my_vip3Ba1 301 AATGAGCAAAATCTGATGTTAAATAATGTTAATGCTCAACTTAATTCAAT 350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 283 AATGAGCAAAATCTGATGTTAAATAATGTTAATGCTCAACTTAATTCAAT 332 my_vip3Ba1 351 AAATGCAACACTTAATACCTATCTTCCAAAAATTACATCTATGCTAAATG 400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 333 AAATGCAACACTTAATACCTATCTTCCAAAAATTACATCTATGCTAAATG 382 my_vip3Ba1 401 AGGTAATGAAACAAAACTATGTTTTAAGTCTACAAATAGAATTTCTTAGT 450 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 383 AGGTAATGAAACAAAACTATGTTTTAAGTCTACAAATAGAATTTCTTAGT 432 my_vip3Ba1 451 AAACAATTACAAGAGATTTCAGATAAACTTGATATTATCAATTTAAATGT 500 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 433 AAACAATTACAAGAGATTTCAGATAAACTTGATATTATCAATTTAAATGT 482 my_vip3Ba1 501 ATTAATTAACTCTACATTGACAGAGATTACGCCTGCTTATCAACGTATTA 550 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 483 ATTAATTAACTCTACATTGACAGAGATTACGCCTGCTTATCAACGTATTA 532 my_vip3Ba1 551 AATATGTAAACGATAAATTTGATGAATTGACTTCTACTGTAGAAAAAAAT 600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 533 AATATGTAAACGATAAATTTGATGAATTGACTTCTACTGTAGAAAAAAAT 582 my_vip3Ba1 601 CCAAAAATTAATCAAGATAATTTTACTGAAGATGTTATTGATAATTTAAC 650 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 583 CCAAAAATTAATCAAGATAATTTTACTGAAGATGTTATTGATAATTTAAC 632 my_vip3Ba1 651 TGATCTAACTGAACTAGCAAGAAGTGTAACGAGAAATGATATGGATAGTT 700
140
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 633 TGATCTAACTGAACTAGCAAGAAGTGTAACGAGAAATGATATGGATAGTT 682 my_vip3Ba1 701 TTGAATTTTATATTAAAACTTTCCATGATGTGATGATAGGAAATAATTTA 750 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 683 TTGAATTTTATATTAAAACTTTCCATGATGTGATGATAGGAAATAATTTA 732 my_vip3Ba1 751 TTCAGTCGTTCTGCATTAAAAACTGCTTCAGAATTAATTGCTAAGGAAAA 800 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 733 TTCAGTCGTTCTGCATTAAAAACTGCTTCAGAATTAATTGCTAAGGAAAA 782 my_vip3Ba1 801 TATACACACTAGGGGAAGTGAAATTGGTAATGTCTACACTTTTATGATTG 850 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 783 TATACACACTAGGGGAAGTGAAATTGGTAATGTCTACACTTTTATGATTG 832 my_vip3Ba1 851 TTTTGACTTCCTTACAAGCAAAAGCGTTCCTAACTTTAACTACATGTCGT 900 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 833 TTTTGACTTCCTTACAAGCAAAAGCGTTCCTAACTTTAACTACATGTCGT 882 my_vip3Ba1 901 AAATTATTAGGATTAGCAGATATCGATTATACACAAATTATGAATGAAAA 950 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 883 AAATTATTAGGATTAGCAGATATCGATTATACACAAATTATGAATGAAAA 932 my_vip3Ba1 951 TTTAGATAGAGAAAAAGAGGAATTTCGCTTAAATATTCTTCCTACACTTT 1000 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 933 TTTAGATAGAGAAAAAGAGGAATTTCGCTTAAATATTCTTCCTACACTTT 982 my_vip3Ba1 1001 CTAATGATTTTTCTAATCCTAATTATACAGAAACTTTAGGAAGTGATCTT 1050 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 983 CTAATGATTTTTCTAATCCTAATTATACAGAAACTTTAGGAAGTGATCTT 1032 my_vip3Ba1 1051 GTAGATCCAATTGTTACGTTAGAAGCTGAGCCTGGTTATGCTTTAATAGG 1100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1033 GTAGATCCAATTGTTACGTTAGAAGCTGAGCCTGGTTATGCTTTAATAGG 1082 my_vip3Ba1 1101 TTTTGAAATTCTCAATGATCCACTTCCAGTATTAAAAGTATATCAGGCAA 1150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1083 TTTTGAAATTCTCAATGATCCACTTCCAGTATTAAAAGTATATCAGGCAA 1132 my_vip3Ba1 1151 AGCTAAAACCAAATTATCAAGTCGACAAAGAGTCGATTATGGAAAATATT 1200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1133 AGCTAAAACCAAATTATCAAGTCGACAAAGAGTCGATTATGGAAAATATT 1182 my_vip3Ba1 1201 TATGGGAACATCCATAAACTACTTTGTCCAAAACAACGTGAACAAAAATA 1250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1183 TATGGGAACATCCATAAACTACTTTGTCCAAAACAACGTGAACAAAAATA 1232 my_vip3Ba1 1251 TTATATAAAAGACATGACATTCCCTGAAGGTTATGTAATCACCAAAATTG 1300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1233 TTATATAAAAGACATGACATTCCCTGAAGGTTATGTAATCACCAAAATTG 1282 my_vip3Ba1 1301 TTTTTGAAAAAAAATTGAATCTATTAGGATATGAAGTAACAGCAAATCTT 1350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1283 TTTTTGAAAAAAAATTGAATCTATTAGGATATGAAGTAACAGCAAATCTT 1332 my_vip3Ba1 1351 TATGATCCTTTTACAGGAAGTATCGATTTGAATAAGACTATTCTAGAATC 1400 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1333 TATGATCCTTTTACAGGAAGTATCGATTTGAATAAGACTATTCTAGAATC 1382 my_vip3Ba1 1401 ATGGAAAGAAGACTGCTGTGAAGAAGACTGCTGTGAAGAAGACTGCTGTG 1450 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1383 ATGGAAAGAAGACTGCTGTGAAGAAGACTGCTGTGAAGAAGACTGCTGTG 1432 my_vip3Ba1 1451 AAGAAGATTGCTGTGAGGAATTATATAAAATTATAGAGGCGGATACTAAC 1500 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1433 AAGAAGATTGCTGTGAGGAATTATATAAAATTATAGAGGCGGATACTAAC 1482 my_vip3Ba1 1501 GGTGTTTATATGCCTTTGGGTGTAATTAGTGAAACATTTTTAACACCAAT 1550
141
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1483 GGTGTTTATATGCCTTTGGGTGTAATTAGTGAAACATTTTTAACACCAAT 1532 my_vip3Ba1 1551 CTATAGTTTTAAACTAATTATTGACGAAAAAACAAAGAAAATATCTTTAG 1600 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1533 CTATAGTTTTAAACTAATTATTGACGAAAAAACAAAGAAAATATCTTTAG 1582 my_vip3Ba1 1601 CGGGTAAATCTTATTTACGTGAATCTTTACTAGCCACAGATTTAGTTAAT 1650 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1583 CGGGTAAATCTTATTTACGTGAATCTTTACTAGCCACAGATTTAGTTAAT 1632 my_vip3Ba1 1651 AAAGAAACAAATTTAATTCCTTCACCTAATGGTTTCATTAGCAGTATTGT 1700 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1633 AAAGAAACAAATTTAATTCCTTCACCTAATGGTTTCATTAGCAGTATTGT 1682 my_vip3Ba1 1701 GCAAAATTGGCATATAACATCGGATAATATAGAGCCATGGAAAGCGAATA 1750 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1683 GCAAAATTGGCATATAACATCGGATAATATAGAGCCATGGAAAGCGAATA 1732 my_vip3Ba1 1751 ATAAAAATGCATATGTCGATAAGACGGATGCCATGGTGGGATTTAGCTCT 1800 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1733 ATAAAAATGCATATGTCGATAAGACGGATGCCATGGTGGGATTTAGCTCT 1782 my_vip3Ba1 1801 TTATATACTCATAAGGATGGGGAATTCTTGCAATTTATTGGAGCTAAGTT 1850 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1783 TTATATACTCATAAGGATGGGGAATTCTTGCAATTTATTGGAGCTAAGTT 1832 my_vip3Ba1 1851 AAAGGCTAAAACTGAGTATATCATTCAATATACTGTAAAAGGGAATCCGG 1900 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1833 AAAGGCTAAAACTGAGTATATCATTCAATATACTGTAAAAGGGAATCCGG 1882 my_vip3Ba1 1901 AAGTTTATTTAAAAAACAATAAAGATATCTGTTATGAGGATAAAACAAAT 1950 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1883 AAGTTTATTTAAAAAACAATAAAGATATCTGTTATGAGGATAAAACAAAT 1932 my_vip3Ba1 1951 AATTTTGACACGTTTCAAACTATAACTAAAAAATTCAATTCAGGAGTAGA 2000 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1933 AATTTTGACACGTTTCAAACTATAACTAAAAAATTCAATTCAGGAGTAGA 1982 my_vip3Ba1 2001 TCCATCCGAAATATATCTAGTTTTTAAAAATCAAATTGGATATGAAGCAT 2050 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 1983 TCCATCCGAAATATATCTAGTTTTTAAAAATCAAATTGGATATGAAGCAT 2032 my_vip3Ba1 2051 GGGGAAATAACTTTATTATACTTGAAATTAAGTCGCTTGAAACCCTACCA 2100 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 2033 GGGGAAATAACTTTATTATACTTGAAATTAAGTCGCTTGAAACCCTACCA 2082 my_vip3Ba1 2101 CAAATATTAAAACCTGAAAATTGGATTCCTTTGGGTAATGCTGAGATTAA 2150 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 2083 CAAATATTAAAACCTGAAAATTGGATTCCTTTGGGTAATGCTGAGATTAA 2132 my_vip3Ba1 2151 AGAAGATGGAAAAATTGAGATTTCAGGTAATGGAAGCATGAATCAATATA 2200 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 2133 AGAAGATGGAAAAATTGAGATTTCAGGTAATGGAAGCATGAATCAATATA 2182 my_vip3Ba1 2201 TTCAATTAGAACAGAATTCCAAATATCATCTAAGATTCTCTGTAAAAGGA 2250 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 2183 TTCAATTAGAACAGAATTCCAAATATCATCTAAGATTCTCTGTAAAAGGA 2232 my_vip3Ba1 2251 AAAGGTAGAGTAACGATGCAAGCTCAAACGTCCCATATAAATGTACCAGC 2300 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 2233 AAAGGTAGAGTAACGATGCAAGCTCAAACGTCCCATATAAATGTACCAGC 2282 my_vip3Ba1 2301 TACAAACGAAGAGGTTTCTATAATGATTGAAACTACACGCTTATACGGCG 2350 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 2283 TACAAACGAAGAGGTTTCTATAATGATTGAAACTACACGCTTATACGGCG 2332 my_vip3Ba1 2351 AAGGTATAATTAGCCTATTAAATGATGAAGTGGAGAATTCCGGGGTTATT 2400
142
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| AY823271.1 2333 AAGGTATAATTAGCCTATTAAATGATGAAGTGGAGAATTCCGGGGTTATT 2382 my_vip3Ba1 2401 TTTTCGGATGTATCTATAGTTAAAGAATAA 2430 |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||. AY823271.1 2383 TTTTCGGATGTATCTATAGTTAAAGAATAG 2412
The derived amino acid sequence from vip3Ba1 >vip3Ba1_amino acid (809 amino acids) MHHHHHHNMNNTKLNARALPSFIDYFNGIYGFATGIKDIMNMIFKTDTGGGNLTLDEILKNQDLLNQISDKLDGINGDLGDLIAQGNLNSELTKELLKIANEQNLMLNNVNAQLNSINATLNTYLPKITSMLNEVMKQNYVLSLQIEFLSKQLQEISDKLDIINLNVLINSTLTEITPAYQRIKYVNDKFDELTSTVEKNPKINQDNFTEDVIDNLTDLTELARSVTRNDMDSFEFYIKTFHDVMIGNNLFSRSALKTASELIAKENIHTRGSEIGNVYTFMIVLTSLQAKAFLTLTTCRKLLGLADIDYTQIMNENLDREKEEFRLNILPTLSNDFSNPNYTETLGSDLVDPIVTLEAEPGYALIGFEILNDPLPVLKVYQAKLKPNYQVDKESIMENIYGNIHKLLCPKQREQKYYIKDMTFPEGYVITKIVFEKKLNLLGYEVTANLYDPFTGSIDLNKTILESWKEDCCEEDCCEEDCCEEDCCEELYKIIEADTNGVYMPLGVISETFLTPIYSFKLIIDEKTKKISLAGKSYLRESLLATDLVNKETNLIPSPNGFISSIVQNWHITSDNIEPWKANNKNAYVDKTDAMVGFSSLYTHKDGEFLQFIGAKLKAKTEYIIQYTVKGNPEVYLKNNKDICYEDKTNNFDTFQTITKKFNSGVDPSEIYLVFKNQIGYEAWGNNFIILEIKSLETLPQILKPENWIPLGNAEIKEDGKIEISGNGSMNQYIQLEQNSKYHLRFSVKGKGRVTMQAQTSHINVPATNEEVSIMIETTRLYGEGIISLLNDEVENSGVIFSDVSIVKE*
143
APPENDIX II: The DNA sequence of the vip3Ba gene modified for expression in plants
>Vip3BaORF_cowpea
ATGAACATGAACAACACCAAGCTCAACGCTAGGGCCCTCCCATCCTTCATCGATTACTTCAACGGAATCTACGGCTTCGCCACCGGCATCAAGGATATCATGAATATGATCTTCAAGACCGACACCGGCGGAGGTAACCTTACCCTTGATGAGATTssCTCAAGAACCAGGACCTCCTCAACCAGATCTCCGATAAGCTCGATGGAATCAACGGCGATCTCGGTGATCTTATCGCTCAGGGAAACCTCAACTCCGAGCTGACCAAAGAGCTTCTCAAGATCGCTAACGAGCAGAACCTCATGCTCAACAACGTGAACGCTCAGCTCAACTCCATTAACGCTACCCTCAACACCTACCTCCCCAAGATTACCTCCATGCTGAACGAGGTGATGAAGCAGAACTACGTGCTCAGCCTCCAGATCGAGTTCTTGTCCAAGCAGCTCCAAGAGATCAGCGACAAGCTCGACATCATCAACCTCAACGTGCTCATCAACTCCACCCTTACCGAGATTACTCCAGCCTACCAGAGGATCAAGTACGTGAACGATAAGTTCGACGAGCTTACCTCCACCGTTGAGAAGAACCCAAAGATCAACCAGGACAACTTCACCGAGGACGTGATCGATAACCTCACCGATCTTACCGAGCTTGCCAGATCTGTGACTAGGAACGACATGGACAGCTTCGAGTTCTACATCAAGACCTTCCACGACGTGATGATCGGCAACAACCTGTTCTCTAGGTCCGCTCTTAAGACCGCCTCTGAGCTTATTGCCAAAGAGAACATTCACACCAGGGGCTCCGAGATCGGAAACGTTTACACCTTCATGATCGTGCTCACCAGCCTTCAGGCTAAGGCTTTCCTTACTCTTACTACCTGCAGAAAGCTCCTCGGCCTCGCTGATATTGATTACACCCAGATCATGAACGAGAACCTCGACCGTGAGAAAGAAGAGTTCAGGCTCAACATCCTCCCCACCCTTTCCAACGATTTCTCCAACCCAAACTACACCGAGACTCTCGGATCTGATCTCGTGGATCCAATTGTGACTCTTGAGGCAGAGCCAGGATACGCTCTTATCGGATTCGAGATCCTCAACGATCCACTCCCAGTGCTTAAGGTGTACCAGGCTAAGCTCAAGCCCAACTACCAGGTGGACAAAGAATCCATCATGGAAAACATCTACGGCAACATCCACAAGCTCCTCTGCCCAAAGCAACGTGAGCAGAAGTACTACATTAAGGACATGACCTTCCCCGAGGGCTACGTGATCACTAAGATTGTGTTCGAGAAGAAGCTCAACCTCCTCGGATATGAGGTGACCGCTAACCTCTACGATCCATTCACCGGATCCATCGACCTCAACAAGACCATTCTCGAGTCCTGGAAAGAGGACTGCTGCGAGGAAGATTGCTGCGAAGAGGACTGTTGTGAAGAGGATTGCTGTGAGGAACTCTACAAGATCATCGAGGCTGACACCAACGGTGTGTACATGCCACTTGGAGTGATCTCCGAGACTTTCCTGACCCCCATCTACAGCTTCAAGCTCATCATCGACGAAAAGACCAAGAAGATCTCCCTCGCCGGAAAGTCCTACCTTAGAGAGTCTCTTCTTGCTACCGACCTCGTGAACAAAGAGACTAACCTCATCCCATCCCCCAACGGCTTCATCTCTTCTATTGTGCAGAACTGGCACATCACCTCCGACAACATTGAACCATGGAAGGCCAACAACAAGAACGCCTACGTTGACAAGACCGATGCTATGGTGGGATTCAGCTCTCTCTACACCCATAAGGATGGTGAGTTCCTCCAGTTCATCGGCGCTAAGCTTAAGGCTAAGACCGAGTACATCATCCAGTACACCGTGAAGGGAAACCCAGAGGTGTACCTCAAGAACAACAAGGACATCTGCTACGAGGACAAGACCAACAACTTCGACACCTTCCAGACCATCACCAAGAAATTCAACTCCGGCGTTGACCCCTCTGAGATCTACCTCGTTTTTAAGAACCAGATCGGCTACGAGGCTTGGGGGAACAACTTCATTATCCTCGAGATCAAGTCCCTCGAGACACTCCCACAGATTCTTAAGCCAGAGAACTGGATCCCACTCGGCAACGCTGAAATCAAAGAGGATGGCAAGATCGAGATCTCCGGCAACGGATCTATGAACCAGTACATTCAGCTTGAGCAGAACTCCAAGTACCACCTCAGGTTCTCTGTTAAGGGAAAGGGAAGGGTTACCATGCAGGCTCAGACCTCTCATATTAACGTGCCAGCTACCAACGAAGAGGTGTCCATCATGATTGAGACTACCAGGCTTTACGGGGAGGGGATTATTTCCTTGCTCAACGACGAGGTTGAGAACAGCGGTGTGATCTTCTCCGATGTGTCCATCGTGAAAGAGTGA
144
APPENDIX III: Sequence alignment of vip3Ba gene (optimized cowpea version vs the original bacterial version) vip3Ba_cowpea 1 ATGAACATGAACAACACCAAGCTCAACGCTAGGGCCCTCCCATCCTTCAT 50 |||||||||||.||.||.||..|.|||||.||||||.|.|||...||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 1 ATGAACATGAATAATACTAAATTAAACGCAAGGGCCTTACCAAGTTTTAT 50 vip3Ba_cowpea 51 CGATTACTTCAACGGAATCTACGGCTTCGCCACCGGCATCAAGGATATCA 100 .|||||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.|||||.||.|||||.||.||.| vip3Ba_Bt 51 TGATTATTTTAATGGCATTTATGGATTTGCCACTGGTATCAAAGACATTA 100 vip3Ba_cowpea 101 TGAATATGATCTTCAAGACCGACACCGGCGGAGGTAACCTTACCCTTGAT 150 ||||.|||||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.|||||..|.||.||.||| vip3Ba_Bt 101 TGAACATGATTTTTAAAACGGATACAGGTGGTGGTAATTTAACACTAGAT 150 vip3Ba_cowpea 151 GAGATTCTCAAGAACCAGGACCTCCTCAACCAGATCTCCGATAAGCTCGA 200 ||.|||.|.|||||.||.||..|..|.||.||.|||||.|||||.||||| vip3Ba_Bt 151 GAAATTTTAAAGAATCAAGATTTATTAAATCAAATCTCAGATAAACTCGA 200 vip3Ba_cowpea 201 TGGAATCAACGGCGATCTCGGTGATCTTATCGCTCAGGGAAACCTCAACT 250 ||||||.||.||.|||.|.|||||||||||.||.||.||.||..|.||.| vip3Ba_Bt 201 TGGAATTAATGGAGATTTAGGTGATCTTATTGCACAAGGGAATTTGAATT 250 vip3Ba_cowpea 251 CCGAGCTGACCAAAGAGCTTCTCAAGATCGCTAACGAGCAGAACCTCATG 300 |.||.||.||.||.||..|..|.||.|||||.||.|||||.||.||.||| vip3Ba_Bt 251 CAGAACTAACTAAGGAATTATTAAAAATCGCCAATGAGCAAAATCTGATG 300 vip3Ba_cowpea 301 CTCAACAACGTGAACGCTCAGCTCAACTCCATTAACGCTACCCTCAACAC 350 .|.||.||.||.||.|||||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 301 TTAAATAATGTTAATGCTCAACTTAATTCAATAAATGCAACACTTAATAC 350 vip3Ba_cowpea 351 CTACCTCCCCAAGATTACCTCCATGCTGAACGAGGTGATGAAGCAGAACT 400 |||.||.||.||.|||||.||.|||||.||.|||||.|||||.||.|||| vip3Ba_Bt 351 CTATCTTCCAAAAATTACATCTATGCTAAATGAGGTAATGAAACAAAACT 400 vip3Ba_cowpea 401 ACGTGCTCAGCCTCCAGATCG-AGTTCTT-GTCCAAGCAGCTCCAAGAGA 448 |.||..|.||.||.||.||.| |.||||| || ||.||..|.||||||| vip3Ba_Bt 401 ATGTTTTAAGTCTACAAATAGAATTTCTTAGT--AAACAATTACAAGAGA 448 vip3Ba_cowpea 449 --TCAGCGACAAGCTCGACATCATCAACCTCAACGTGCTCATCAACTCCA 496 ||| ||.||.||.||.||.|||||..|.||.||..|.||.|||||.| vip3Ba_Bt 449 TTTCA--GATAAACTTGATATTATCAATTTAAATGTATTAATTAACTCTA 496 vip3Ba_cowpea 497 CCCTTACCGAGATTACTCCAGCCTACCAGAGGATCAAGTACGTGAACGAT 546 |..|.||.||||||||.||.||.||.||..|.||.||.||.||.|||||| vip3Ba_Bt 497 CATTGACAGAGATTACGCCTGCTTATCAACGTATTAAATATGTAAACGAT 546 vip3Ba_cowpea 547 AAGTTCGACGAGCTTACCTCCACCGTTGAGAAGAACCCAAAGATCAACCA 596 ||.||.||.||..|.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.|||||.||.||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 547 AAATTTGATGAATTGACTTCTACTGTAGAAAAAAATCCAAAAATTAATCA 596 vip3Ba_cowpea 597 GGACAACTTCACCGAGGACGTGATCGATAACCTCACCGATCTTACCGAGC 646 .||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.|||||..|.||.|||||.||.||.| vip3Ba_Bt 597 AGATAATTTTACTGAAGATGTTATTGATAATTTAACTGATCTAACTGAAC 646 vip3Ba_cowpea 647 TTGCCAGATCTGTGACTAGGAACGACATGGACAGCTTCGAGTTCTACATC 696 |.||.|||..|||.||.||.||.||.|||||.||.||.||.||.||.||. vip3Ba_Bt 647 TAGCAAGAAGTGTAACGAGAAATGATATGGATAGTTTTGAATTTTATATT 696 vip3Ba_cowpea 697 AAGACCTTCCACGACGTGATGATCGGCAACAACCTGTTCTCTAGGTCCGC 746 ||.||.|||||.||.||||||||.||.||.||..|.|||..|.|.||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 697 AAAACTTTCCATGATGTGATGATAGGAAATAATTTATTCAGTCGTTCTGC 746 vip3Ba_cowpea 747 TCTTAAGACCGCCTCTGAGCTTATTGCCAAAGAGAACATTCACACCAGGG 796 ..|.||.||.||.||.||..|.|||||.||.||.||.||.|||||.|||| vip3Ba_Bt 747 ATTAAAAACTGCTTCAGAATTAATTGCTAAGGAAAATATACACACTAGGG 796
145
vip3Ba_cowpea 797 GCTCCGAGATCGGAAACGTTTACACCTTCATGATCGTGCTCACCAGCCTT 846 |....||.||.||.||.||.|||||.||.|||||.||..|.| |..|||| vip3Ba_Bt 797 GAAGTGAAATTGGTAATGTCTACACTTTTATGATTGTTTTGA-CTTCCTT 845 vip3Ba_cowpea 847 -CAGGCTAAGGCTTTCCTTACTCTTACTACCTGCAGAAAGCTCCTCGGCC 895 ||.||.||.||.|||||.|||.|.|||||.||..|.||..|..|.||.. vip3Ba_Bt 846 ACAAGCAAAAGCGTTCCTAACTTTAACTACATGTCGTAAATTATTAGGAT 895 vip3Ba_cowpea 896 TCGCTGATATTGATTACACCCAGATCATGAACGAGAACCTCGACCGTGAG 945 |.||.|||||.|||||.||.||.||.|||||.||.||..|.||..|.||. vip3Ba_Bt 896 TAGCAGATATCGATTATACACAAATTATGAATGAAAATTTAGATAGAGAA 945 vip3Ba_cowpea 946 AAAGAAGAGTTCAGGCTCAACATCCTCCCCACCCTTTCCAACGATTTCTC 995 |||||.||.||..|..|.||.||.||.||.||.|||||.||.|||||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 946 AAAGAGGAATTTCGCTTAAATATTCTTCCTACACTTTCTAATGATTTTTC 995 vip3Ba_cowpea 996 CAACCCAAACTACACCGAGACTCTCGGATCTGATCTCGTGGATCCAATTG 1045 .||.||.||.||.||.||.|||.|.|||..||||||.||.|||||||||| vip3Ba_Bt 996 TAATCCTAATTATACAGAAACTTTAGGAAGTGATCTTGTAGATCCAATTG 1045 vip3Ba_cowpea 1046 TGACTCTTGAGGCAGAGCCAGGATACGCTCTTATCGGATTCGAGATCCTC 1095 |.||..|.||.||.|||||.||.||.|||.|.||.||.||.||.||.||| vip3Ba_Bt 1046 TTACGTTAGAAGCTGAGCCTGGTTATGCTTTAATAGGTTTTGAAATTCTC 1095 vip3Ba_cowpea 1096 AACGATCCACTCCCAGTGCTTAAGGTGTACCAGGCTAAGCTCAAGCCCAA 1145 ||.||||||||.|||||..|.||.||.||.|||||.|||||.||.||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 1096 AATGATCCACTTCCAGTATTAAAAGTATATCAGGCAAAGCTAAAACCAAA 1145 vip3Ba_cowpea 1146 CTACCAGGTGGACAAAGAATCCATCATGGAAAACATCTACGGCAACATCC 1195 .||.||.||.||||||||.||.||.||||||||.||.||.||.||||||| vip3Ba_Bt 1146 TTATCAAGTCGACAAAGAGTCGATTATGGAAAATATTTATGGGAACATCC 1195 vip3Ba_cowpea 1196 ACAAGCTCCTCTGCCCAAAGCAACGTGAGCAGAAGTACTACATTAAGGAC 1245 |.||.||.||.||.|||||.||||||||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||| vip3Ba_Bt 1196 ATAAACTACTTTGTCCAAAACAACGTGAACAAAAATATTATATAAAAGAC 1245 vip3Ba_cowpea 1246 ATGACCTTCCCCGAGGGCTACGTGATCACTAAGATTGTGTTCGAGAAGAA 1295 |||||.|||||.||.||.||.||.|||||.||.|||||.||.||.||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 1246 ATGACATTCCCTGAAGGTTATGTAATCACCAAAATTGTTTTTGAAAAAAA 1295 vip3Ba_cowpea 1296 GCTCAACCTCCTCGGATATGAGGTGACCGCTAACCTCTACGATCCATTCA 1345 ..|.||.||..|.||||||||.||.||.||.||.||.||.|||||.||.| vip3Ba_Bt 1296 ATTGAATCTATTAGGATATGAAGTAACAGCAAATCTTTATGATCCTTTTA 1345 vip3Ba_cowpea 1346 CCGGATCCATCGACCTCAACAAGACCATTCTCGAGTCCTGGAAAGAGGAC 1395 |.|||...|||||..|.||.|||||.|||||.||.||.||||||||.||| vip3Ba_Bt 1346 CAGGAAGTATCGATTTGAATAAGACTATTCTAGAATCATGGAAAGAAGAC 1395 vip3Ba_cowpea 1396 TGCTGCGAGGAAGATTGCTGCGAAGAGGACTGTTGTGAAGAGGATTGCTG 1445 |||||.||.|||||.|||||.|||||.|||||.||||||||.|||||||| vip3Ba_Bt 1396 TGCTGTGAAGAAGACTGCTGTGAAGAAGACTGCTGTGAAGAAGATTGCTG 1445 vip3Ba_cowpea 1446 TGAGGAACTCTACAAGATCATCGAGGCTGACACCAACGGTGTGTACATGC 1495 |||||||.|.||.||.||.||.|||||.||.||.||||||||.||.|||| vip3Ba_Bt 1446 TGAGGAATTATATAAAATTATAGAGGCGGATACTAACGGTGTTTATATGC 1495 vip3Ba_cowpea 1496 CACTTGGAGTGATCTCCGAGACTTTCCTGACCCCCATCTACAGCTTCAAG 1545 |..|.||.||.||....||.||.||..|.||.||.|||||.||.||.||. vip3Ba_Bt 1496 CTTTGGGTGTAATTAGTGAAACATTTTTAACACCAATCTATAGTTTTAAA 1545 vip3Ba_cowpea 1546 CTCATCATCGACGAAAAGACCAAGAAGATCTCCCTCGCCGGAAAGTCCTA 1595 ||.||.||.||||||||.||.|||||.||.||..|.||.||.||.||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 1546 CTAATTATTGACGAAAAAACAAAGAAAATATCTTTAGCGGGTAAATCTTA 1595 vip3Ba_cowpea 1596 CCTTA-GAGAGTCTCTTCTTGCTACCGACCTCGTGAACAAAGAGACTAAC 1644 .||| |.||.|||.|.||.||.||.||..|.||.||.|||||.||.||. vip3Ba_Bt 1596 -TTTACGTGAATCTTTACTAGCCACAGATTTAGTTAATAAAGAAACAAAT 1644
146
vip3Ba_cowpea 1645 CTCATCCCATCCCCCAACGGCTTCATCTCTT----CTATTGTGCAGAACT 1690 .|.||.||.||.||.||.||.|||| || .|||||||||.||.| vip3Ba_Bt 1645 TTAATTCCTTCACCTAATGGTTTCA----TTAGCAGTATTGTGCAAAATT 1690 vip3Ba_cowpea 1691 GGCACATCACCTCCGACAACATTGAACCATGGAAGGCCAACAACAAGAAC 1740 ||||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||||||||.||.||.||.||.||. vip3Ba_Bt 1691 GGCATATAACATCGGATAATATAGAGCCATGGAAAGCGAATAATAAAAAT 1740 vip3Ba_cowpea 1741 GCCTACGTTGACAAGACCGATGCTATGGTGGGATTCAGCTCTCTCTACAC 1790 ||.||.||.||.|||||.|||||.|||||||||||.||||||.|.||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 1741 GCATATGTCGATAAGACGGATGCCATGGTGGGATTTAGCTCTTTATATAC 1790 vip3Ba_cowpea 1791 CCATAAGGATGGTGAGTTCCTCCAGTTCATCGGCGCTAAGCTTAAGGCTA 1840 .|||||||||||.||.|||.|.||.||.||.||.||||||.|.||||||| vip3Ba_Bt 1791 TCATAAGGATGGGGAATTCTTGCAATTTATTGGAGCTAAGTTAAAGGCTA 1840 vip3Ba_cowpea 1841 AGACCGAGTACATCATCCAGTACACCGTGAAGGGAAACCCAGAGGTGTAC 1890 |.||.|||||.|||||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||. vip3Ba_Bt 1841 AAACTGAGTATATCATTCAATATACTGTAAAAGGGAATCCGGAAGTTTAT 1890 vip3Ba_cowpea 1891 CTCAAGAACAACAAGGACATCTGCTACGAGGACAAGACCAACAACTTCGA 1940 .|.||.|||||.||.||.|||||.||.|||||.||.||.||.||.||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 1891 TTAAAAAACAATAAAGATATCTGTTATGAGGATAAAACAAATAATTTTGA 1940 vip3Ba_cowpea 1941 CACCTTCCAGACCATCACCAAGAAATTCAACTCCGGCGTTGACCCCTCTG 1990 |||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||||||||.||.||.||.||.||.||.| vip3Ba_Bt 1941 CACGTTTCAAACTATAACTAAAAAATTCAATTCAGGAGTAGATCCATCCG 1990 vip3Ba_cowpea 1991 AGATCTACCTCGTTTTTAAGAACCAGATCGGCTACGAGGCTTGGGGGAAC 2040 |.||.||.||.||||||||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.|||||.||. vip3Ba_Bt 1991 AAATATATCTAGTTTTTAAAAATCAAATTGGATATGAAGCATGGGGAAAT 2040 vip3Ba_cowpea 2041 AACTTCATTATCCTCGAGATCAAGTCCCTCGAGACACTCCCACAGATTCT 2090 |||||.|||||.||.||.||.|||||.||.||.||.||.|||||.||..| vip3Ba_Bt 2041 AACTTTATTATACTTGAAATTAAGTCGCTTGAAACCCTACCACAAATATT 2090 vip3Ba_cowpea 2091 TAAGCCAGAGAACTGGATCCCACTCGGCAACGCTGAAATCAAAGAGGATG 2140 .||.||.||.||.|||||.||..|.||.||.|||||.||.|||||.|||| vip3Ba_Bt 2091 AAAACCTGAAAATTGGATTCCTTTGGGTAATGCTGAGATTAAAGAAGATG 2140 vip3Ba_cowpea 2141 GCAAGATCGAGATCTCCGGCAACGGATCTATGAACCAGTACATTCAGCTT 2190 |.||.||.|||||.||.||.||.|||...|||||.||.||.|||||..|. vip3Ba_Bt 2141 GAAAAATTGAGATTTCAGGTAATGGAAGCATGAATCAATATATTCAATTA 2190 vip3Ba_cowpea 2191 GAGCAGAACTCCAAGTACCACCTCAGGTTCTCTGTTAAGGGAAAGGGAAG 2240 ||.|||||.|||||.||.||.||.||.||||||||.||.|||||.||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 2191 GAACAGAATTCCAAATATCATCTAAGATTCTCTGTAAAAGGAAAAGGTAG 2240 vip3Ba_cowpea 2241 GGTTACCATGCAGGCTCAGACCTCTCATATTAACGTGCCAGCTACCAACG 2290 .||.||.|||||.|||||.||.||.|||||.||.||.||||||||.|||| vip3Ba_Bt 2241 AGTAACGATGCAAGCTCAAACGTCCCATATAAATGTACCAGCTACAAACG 2290 vip3Ba_cowpea 2291 AAGAGGTGTCCATCATGATTGAGACTACCAGGCTT-TACGGGGAGGGGAT 2339 |||||||.||.||.||||||||.|||| ||.|||| |||||.||.||.|| vip3Ba_Bt 2291 AAGAGGTTTCTATAATGATTGAAACTA-CACGCTTATACGGCGAAGGTAT 2339 vip3Ba_cowpea 2340 TATTTCCTTGCTCAACGACGAGGTTGAGAACAGCGGTGTGATCTTCTCCG 2389 .|||..|.|..|.||.||.||.||.|||||...|||.||.||.||.||.| vip3Ba_Bt 2340 AATTAGCCTATTAAATGATGAAGTGGAGAATTCCGGGGTTATTTTTTCGG 2389 vip3Ba_cowpea 2390 ATGTGTCCATCGTGAAAGAGT 2410 ||||.||.||.||.|||||.| vip3Ba_Bt 2390 ATGTATCTATAGTTAAAGAAT 2410