Electron microscopy in molecular cell biology I

Werner Kühlbrandt

Max Planck Institute of Biophysics

Electron optics and image formation

Donnerstag, 3. Juli 14

• Galaxy! ! ! 106 light years! 1022 m • Solar system! ! light minutes! ! 1010 m• Planet! ! ! 20,000 km! ! 107 m• Man! ! ! 1.7 m! ! ! 100 m• Fly! ! ! ! 3 mm! ! ! 10-3 m• Cell ! ! ! 50 µm! ! ! 10-5 m• Bacterium! ! ! 1 µm! ! ! 10-6 m• Virus! ! ! 100 nm! ! 10-7 m• Protein! ! ! 10 nm! ! ! 10-8 m• Sugar molecule! ! 1 nm! ! ! 10-9 m• Atom! ! ! 0.1 nm = 1Å! ! 10-10 m• Electron! ! ! 0.1 pm!! 10-13 m

Objects of interest

Which objects can we see?

Which objects can we see?R

0.1nm=1Å 1nm 10nm 100nm 1µm 10µm 100µm 1mm 10mm

x-ray crystallography

electron microscopy

light microscopy

organisms

cellsproteins

small molecules

atomsviruses

bacteria

Structural methods in molecular cell biology

Part 1:

Electron optics

Microscopy with electrons

• Electrons are energy-rich elementary particles

• Electrons have much shorter wavelength than x-rays (~ 3 pm = 3 x 10-12 m for 100kV electrons)

• Resolution not limited by wavelength!

• but by comparatively poor quality of magnetic lenses and radiation damage

• High vacuum is essential - no live specimens!

Electron microscopes300 kV 120 kV

The transmission electron microscope

camera

electron gun

camera

electron gun

condenser

camera

electron gun

objective lens

condenser

camera

electron gun

projector lenses

objective lens

condenser

camera

electron gun

projector lenses

objective lens

condenser

projection chamber

camera

electron gun

projector lenses

objective lens

condenser

projection chamber

camera vacuum pump

electron gun

projector lenses

objective lens

condenser

viewing screen

projection chamber

camera vacuum pump

electron gun

projector lenses

objective lens

condenser

viewing screen

projection chamber

camera

vacuum pump

electron gun

projector lenses

objective lens

condenser

viewing screen

projection chamber

specimen camera

camera

vacuum pump

electron source

specimen

objective lens

diffraction plane

image planefocus plane

electron source

specimen

objective lens

focus plane

diffraction plane

image plane

Electron sourcesThermionic emittersTungsten filament: emits electrons at ~ 3000 °C (melts at 3380 °C)Large source size, poor coherence of electron beam

LaB6 crystal: single crystal, emits electrons at ~ 2000 °CElectrons are emitted from crystal tip -> smaller source size, better coherenceEnergy spread ΔE ~ 1 - 2 eV, depending on temperature

Field emitters Oriented tungsten single crystal, tip radius ~ 100 nmSmall source size -> high coherence of electron beam, high brillianceRequires very high vacuum (10 -11 Torr)Electrons extracted from crystal by electric field applied to tip (extraction voltage)

Schottky emitter: Zr plated, heated to ~ 1200 °C to assist electron emission and prevent contamination, energy spread ΔE ~0.5 eV

Cold field emitter: not heated, very low energy spread, best temporal coherence, but contaminates easily (frequent ‘flashing’ with oxygen gas)

tungsten filament field emission tip

incoherent electron beam coherent electron beam

Coherence

temporal coherence: all waves have the same wavelength (they are monochromatic)

spatial coherence: all waves are emitted from the same point source (as in a laser)

According to the dualism of elementary particles in quantum mechanics, electrons can be considered as particles or waves. Both models are valid and used in electron optics.

Electrons can be regarded as particles to describe scattering.

The wave model is more useful to describe diffraction, interference, phase contrast and image formation.

Electrons: particles or waves?

Rest mass m0 = 9.1091x10

−31kg

Charge Q = −e = −1.602x10−19C

Kinetic energy E = eU,1eV = 1.602x10−19

NmRest energy E0 = m0c 2 = 511keV = 0.511MeVVelocity of li ght c = 2.9979x108

ms −1

Planck’s constant h = 6.6256x10−34Nms

Non-relativistic (E << E0) Relativistic (E ~ E0)

Mass m = m 0 m = m0 1− v 2 / c2( )−1 / 2

Energy E = eU =12

mc 2 = m0c2 + eU = E 0 + E

m = m0 1 + E / E0( )

Velocity v = 2E / m0( )1 / 2

v = c [1−1

1+ E / E0( )2

Momentum p = m 0v = 2m 0E( )1/ 2

p = mv = 2m0E 1+ E /2E0 ( )[ ]1 / 2

2EE0 + E2

( )1 / 2

de Brogli e wavelength λ =hp = h 2m0E( )

−1 / 2λ = h 2m0 E 1+ E / 2E0( )[ ]

− 1 / 2

=hc 2EE0 + E2

( )−1 / 2

Electron parameters

Electrons in an electrostatic (Coulomb) field

The force produced by an electrostatic field E on a particle of (negative) charge e- is

F = -eE

This means that the electron is accelerated towards the anode.The kinetic energy E [eV] of the electron after passing through a voltage U [V] is

E = eU

The wavelength of an electron moving at veolicty v (de Broglie wavelength) is

λ = h/mv where h is Planck’s constant, m the rest mass of the electron. Both the mass and the velocity of the electron are energy dependent. Relativistic treatment is necessary for acceleration voltages > 80 kV.

Electron beams are monochromatic except for a small thermal energy spread arising from the temperature of the electron emitter.

de Broglie wavelength

acceleration velocity wavelengthvoltage

100 kV 1.64 x 108 m/s 3.7 pm = 0.037 Å

200 kV 2.5 pm = 0.025 Å

300 kV 2.0 pm = 0.02 Å

Highest possible resolution:1/d = 2/λ

d = λ/2

θ = 90°

Resolution limit in crystallography

Reciprocal space!

Resolution limit

Diffraction (Rayleigh) limit: ~ 0.5 λ• ~150 nm = 1,500 Å for visible light• 0.5 Å for x-rays• 0.01 Å = 1 pm for 300 kV electrons

specimen

electron source

objective lens

focus plane

diffraction plane

image plane

E E -ΔEE E -ΔE

Incident beam of energy E

elastic inelastic

Electron-‐specimen interactions

Elastic and inelastic scattering cross sections for electrons, x-rays and neutrons

R. Henderson, Quart. Rev. Biophys. 1995

Electron scattering factors

Large elastic cross section• ~106 higher than for x-‐rays high signal per scattering event

… but even larger inelastic cross section• σinel/σel ≈ 18/Z high radiation damage, especially for light atoms, e.g. C: 3 electrons scattered inelastically per elastic event

Good ratio of elastic/inelastic scattering• 1000 times better than for 1.5 Å x-‐rays

carbon

Considerations for biological specimens

• Biological specimens consist mainly of light atoms (H, N, C, O), which suffer most from radiation damage

• This makes it essential to minimize the electron dose to about ~25 e/Å2 for single-‐particle cryoEM

• Low electron dose means low image contrast

electron source

specimen

objective lens

focus plane

diffraction plane

image plane

Electrons in a magnetic fieldLorentz force on a charge e- moving with velocity v in a magnetic field B(vectors are bold): F = -e (v x B)

The direction of F is perpendicular on v and B. v, B, and F form a right-handed system (right-hand rule, where v = index finger, B = middle finger and c = thumb)

In a homogenous magnetic field, if

v = 0 then F = 0

v is perpendicular to B: the electron is forced on a circle with a radius depending on the field strength |B|

v is parallel to B: no change of direction

Note that unlike the electric field, the magnetic field does not change the energy of the electron, i. e. the wavelength does not change!

Electromagnetic field

Passing a current through a coil of wire produces a strong magnetic field in the centre of the coil. The field strength depends on the number of windings and the current passing through the coil.

Electromagnetic Lens

Pole pieces of soft ironconcentrate the magnetic field

EM grid

2mm x 2mm

Magnification steps

grid square with holey carbon film

20 µm x 20 µm

EM grid

2mm x 2mm

Magnification steps

20 µm x 20 µm

EM grid

2mm x 2mm

2µm x 2µm

6,000x60x

Magnification steps

20 µm x 20 µm

EM grid

2mm x 2mm

2µm x 2µm

6,000x60x 60,000x

FAS in vitreous buffer

0.2 µm x 0.2 µm

Magnification steps

electron source

specimen

objective lens

focus plane

diffraction plane

image plane

Electron diffraction

diffraction angle

Bragg’s law: nλ = 2d sinθ

Electron diffraction

diffraction angle

Interference

constructive interference destructive interference

superposition

1st wave

2nd wave

Elastic scattering by atoms (Rayleigh scattering)

n is an integer:scattered waves in phase,constructive interference

n is not an integer:scattered waves out of phase,destructive interference

2D crystals of LHC-II

Kühlbrandt, Nature 1984

Electron diffraction pattern: amplitudes, no phases

3.2 Å

The image is generated by interference of the direct electron beam with the diffracted beams

Part 2:

Image formation

electron source

specimen

objective lens

diffraction plane

image plane

focus plane

E E -ΔEE E -ΔE

Incident beam of energy E

elastic inelastic

Electron-‐specimen interactions

Contrast mechanisms

no interaction

phase object

amplitude object

modified phase

electron wave

modified amplitude, unchanged phase

modified phase, unchanged amplitude

amplitude contrast

phase contrast shorter

wavelength within object

Origin of the phase shift

The potential V(x,y,z) experienced by the scattered electron upon passing through a sample of thickness t causes a phase shift

The vacuum wavelength λ of the electron changes to λ` within the sample:

When passing through a sample of thickness dz, the electron experiences a phase shift of:

Vt (x,y) = V (x,y,z)dz0

λ =h2meE

" λ =h

2me(E +V (x,y,z))

dϕ = 2π (dz$ λ −dzλ)

dϕ =πλE

V (x,y,z)dz =σV (x,y,z)dz

ψincident

ψexit

V(x,y,z)

(how many times does λ fit into the thickness dz?)(by how many degrees out of 2π = 360° does this change the phase φ?)

The potential V of the specimen shift modifies the phase of the incident plane wave ψincident to:

àFor thin biological specimens there is a linear relation between the transmitted exit wave function and the projected potential of the sample:

ϕ =σ V (x,y,z)dz∫ =σVt (x,y)As we have seen, the phase shift is proportional to the projected potential of the specimen:

Ψexit =Ψincidente− iϕ =Ψincidente

−iσVt

Ψexit ≈ Ψincident

≡1(background )! " # (1− iϕ) =1− iϕ =1− iσVt

Ψexit =Ψincidente− iϕ

≈ Ψincident (1− iϕ) =Ψincident − iΨincidentϕ =Ψincident − iΨscattered

For Vt<<1 and thus φ<<2π as for thin biological specimens:

i = eiπ2 = cos(π2 ) + isin(π2 )

ψincident

ψexit

V(x,y,z)

The weak phase approximation

Taylor series

f (n )(a)n!n=0

∑ (x − a)n

sin(x) ≈ x − x3

3!+x 5

5!−x 7

7!+O(xn )

ex ≈1+ x +x 2

2!+x 3

3!+O(xn )

e−iϕ ≈1− iϕ +ϕ2

2!− iϕ

3!+O(ϕn )

≈1− iϕ if φ << 1 !

taken from Wikipedia...

Any function can be approximated by a finite number of polynomial terms

Taylor series

f (n )(a)n!n=0

∑ (x − a)n

sin(x) ≈ x − x3

3!+x 5

5!−x 7

7!+O(xn )

ex ≈1+ x +x 2

2!+x 3

3!+O(xn )

e−iϕ ≈1− iϕ +ϕ2

2!− iϕ

3!+O(ϕn )

≈1− iϕ if φ << 1 !

taken from Wikipedia...

Any function can be approximated by a finite number of polynomial terms

Phase contrastexit wave = scattered wave + unscattered wave

exit wave

imaginary

Ψexit = ψunscattered + iψscattered

Vector notation. Vector length shows amplitude (not drawn to scale)

Cosine wave notation (amplitudes not drawn to scale)

Scattered wave is 90° out of phase with unscattered wave.

à Positive phase contrast A perfect lens in focus gives minimal phase contrast

Since ψscattered = φψunscattered with φ << 1:

ψscattered << ψunscattered

exit wave

Lens aberrations cause an additional phase shift that generates phase contrast

Minimal contrast

Maximal contrast

Defocus phase contrast

exit wave = scattered wave + unscattered wave

Phase contrast

Lens aberrations

Spherical aberration Chromatic aberration

Perfect lensImage plane

In a perfect lens, the number of wavelengths from object to focal point is the same for each ray, independent of scattering angle (Fermat’s principle)

Defocus generates an additional phase shift

Lens with spherical aberration

Image plane

χ = e.g. 3λ/2

Spherical aberration causes a path length difference χ which depends on the scattering angle

Depending on its phase shift, the scattered wave reinforces or weakens the exit wave

exit wave = scattered wave + unscattered wave

scattered and unscattered wave are in phase:exit wave gets stronger

scattered and unscattered wave are out of phase by π = 90°: exit wave gets weaker

scattered wave is shifted by π/2 = 90° relative to unscattered wave:exit wave is nearly same as unscattered wave, therefore phase contrast is minimal

The phase shift χ(θ) introduced by the spherical aberration Cs of the objective lens depends on the scattering angle θ and on the amount of defocus Δf.

! χ(θ) = (2π/λ) [Δf θ2/2 - Cs θ4/4]

The spatial frequency R (measured in Å -1) is the reciprocal of the distance between any two points of the specimen. For small scattering angles, R ≈ θ / λ. With this approximation, the phase shift expressed as a function of R is χ(R) = (π/2) [2Δf R2 λ - Cs R4 λ3]! (Scherzer formula)

At Scherzer focus, the terms containing Δf and Cs nearly add up to 1, and a positive phase shift of χ ≈ +π/2 applies to a wide resolution range.

Optimal (Scherzer) focus

Defocus and spherical aberration have similar but opposite effects

exact focus

Scherzer focus

high underfocus

Contrast transfer in

(Erikson and Klug, 1971)Donnerstag, 3. Juli 14

The phase Contrast Transfer Function B(θ) of the electron microscope is defined as

! B(θ) = -2 sin χ(θ)

For any particular defocus Δf, the CTF indicates the range of scattering angles θ in which the object is imaged with positive (or negative) phase contrast.

For scattering angles where CTF = 0, there is no phase contrast.

As spherical aberration Cs is constant, Δf can be adjusted to produce maximum phase contrast of ±π/2 for a particular range of scattering angles.

The contrast transfer function (CTF)

Fourier transforms of amorphous carbon film imagesunderfocus underfocus

Fourier transforms of amorphous carbon film images

Contrast Transfer Function, CTF

underfocus underfocus

CTF as a function of defocus

Movie by Henning Stahlberg, UC Davis

CTF as a function of defocus

Movie by Henning Stahlberg, UC Davis

electron source

specimen

objective lens

diffraction plane

image plane

focus plane

Janet Vonck, Deryck Mills

Film image

DQE of direct electron detectors

McMullan, Faruqi and Henderson; http://arxiv.org/pdf/1406.1389.pdf

DQE = SNR2o/SNR2i

counting mode, super-resolution

CCD vs. direct detector

300 kV electrons

conventional CCD detector

Falcon-II direct electron detector

50 µm

Richard Henderson, Greg McMullan (MRC-LMB Cambridge, UK)

Scintillator

Fiber optics

CCD chip

Peltier coolerSeparate vacuum

-35°C

CCD vs. direct detector

300 kV electrons

conventional CCD detector

Falcon-II direct electron detector

50 µm

Richard Henderson, Greg McMullan (MRC-LMB Cambridge, UK)

Scintillator

Fiber optics

CCD chip

Peltier coolerSeparate vacuum

-35°C

4000 x 4000 14 µm pixelsread out 17 times per second

Matteo Allegretti, Janet Vonck, Deryck Mills

Fast readout overcomes drift

Frame displacement in Å

3.36 Å

Science, 28 March 2014Science, 28 March 2014

Electron microscopy in molecular cell biology I

Documents

Transcript of Electron microscopy in molecular cell biology I

Cryo-electron microscopy - Rutgers University · 2009-04-28 · Cryo-electron microscopy Methods in Molecular Biophysics, Spring 2009 Sample preparation Single-particle reconstruction

Microscopy I Light and Electron MicroscopyB. Electron Microscopy 1. Scanning 2. Transmission II. Specimen Preparation A. Light Microscopy B. Scanning Electron Microscopy C. Transmission

Enabling Science through European Electron Microscopy€¦ · • EMAT workshop on transmission electron microscopy (ANT) • TEM-UCA workshop on transmission electron microscopy

Scanning Electron Microscopy versus Transmission Electron ...

Electron Microscopy II...24.09.2019 1 Electron Microscopy II krumeich@inorg.chem.ethz.ch • Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) • Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (STEM)

Electron Microscopy Homework_4

Transmission Electron Microscopy Skills:Analytical electron microscopy Lecture 12

“ Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Transmission Electron Microscopy”

Molecular Biophysics - Graduate Center, CUNY · Cryo-Microscopy of Molecular Machines Our research is focused on 3D electron microscopy and computer image processing to study the

TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY

Crystallography & Cryo-electron microscopycasegroup.rutgers.edu/lnotes/cryoEMb.pdf · Crystallography & Cryo-electron microscopy Methods in Molecular Biophysics, Spring 2010 ... Protein

Advances in scanning transmission electron microscopy · Advances in scanning transmission electron microscopy ... Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Group, ... The scanning

Scanning Electron Microscopy

Molecular Imaging Techniques NMR Spectroscopy X-Ray Crystallography Electron Microscopyhackert.cm.utexas.edu/courses/ch370/Fall2012/EM/TEM_SEM... · 2012. 11. 9. · Electron Microscopy

Four-Dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy ... · National Center for Electron Microscopy, Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road,

Electron Microscopy - Scanning electron microscope, Transmission Electron Microscope

Electron microscopy 2

Biological Electron Microscopy - Home - Springer978-1-4419-9244-4/1.pdf · Preface Electron microscopy is frequently portrayed as a discipline that stands alone, separated from molecular

Transmission electron microscopy in renal transplant · PDF fileTransmission electron microscopy in renal ... Transmission electron microscopy in renal transplant pathology ... cv

4D Electron Microscopy