Effects of Seaweeds on in vitro rumen fermentation...

Post on 07-Jul-2020

23 views 0 download

Transcript of Effects of Seaweeds on in vitro rumen fermentation...

15/11/2017 1

Gizaw Dabessa Satessa, Mette Olaf Nielsen, Jens Legarth, Rajan Dhakal and Hanne Helene Hansen 15 October 2017

Effects of Seaweeds on in vitro rumen fermentation, methane and total gas production

• Methane (CH4) is a greenhouse gas (GHG) synthesized by methanogenic archea from hydrogen (H2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) released during ruminal fermentation

Figure 1. Synthesis of methane from H2 in the rumen

• Methane released from livestock: one of the GHG; accounting for ~28% of global anthropogenic CH4

Introduction

2CO2 + 4H2 CH4 + 2H2O

Ruminal fermentation

Methanogenic Archea

Impacts of enteric methane emission

1) Global warming and climate change

• CH4 has 25 times global warming potential compared to CO2

2) Represents loss of energy: Lowers feed efficiency and animal productivity

• Results in loss of 2 to 12% gross energy intake

Reduction of CH4 is a win/win situation:

- Environment

- Farmer economy and cow energy metabolism

½

15/11/2017 3

EU Policy

• EU countries must reduce GHG emissions by 40% in 2030 in the non-quota sector (includes agriculture) compared to 1990 (5,716 mega tons CO2 equivalents)

• Reducing CH4 emission from (ruminant) livestock sector will be a positive contribution to global efforts in GHG emission reduction

15/11/2017 4

Enteric Methane emission mitigation strategies No safe and efficient methods exist as yet:

• Which reduce enteric methanogenesis

• Without significantly reducing feed degradability and hence animal performance

Recently, seaweeds (macroalgae) have attracted interest:

• Contain bioactive compounds

• Some of these are capable of reducing methane formation

15/11/2017 5

Macroalgae (Seaweeds)

• Classified based on pigmentation as:

red macroalgae

brown macroalgae and

green macroalgae

• Contains compounds not found in terrestrial plants:

eg. complex carbohydrates: alginates, laminarin,

fucoidan, mannitol, etc.

15/11/2017 6

Macroalgae…Cont’d

• Wide range of potential uses: antibiotic, anti-oxidant,

anti-inflammatory, immunostimulants, prebiotics, etc.

• Some compounds: anti-methanogenic properties

• Different species of macroalgae differ in their anti-

methanogenic efficiency

15/11/2017 7

Macroalgae…Cont’d

15-11-2017 8

Machado et al. 2014. 9(1):e85289

Asparagopsis taxiformis Dictyota bartayresii

Figure 2. CH4 production from in vitro fermentation of different seaweed species

• In vitro study on Asparagopsis taxiformis in Australia showed about 99% inhibition of methane production

- bromoform, dibromochloromethane, chloroform, etc

Macroalgae…Cont’d

• Asparagopsis is not likely to be used to mitigate CH4 emission:

- halogenated hydrocarbons: - deplete ozone (environement) and carcinogenic (consumer health issues)

15/11/2017 9

Objectives

• Do seaweeds, which can be produced in the Northern Hemisphere, contain compounds with anti-methanogenic properties in the rumen?

• Do they interfere with feed efficiency in ruminants?

• Do they reduce enteric methane emission?

15/11/2017 10

Experimental approach

• We do not want to test this in the first instance in live animals because

1) very expensive 2) we need to know if we have safe compounds

• So, we addressed this question using an in vitro system that mimicks rumen fermentation and allows rapid screening for effective products

15/11/2017 11

In vitro system: mimicking rumen fermentation

15/11/2017 12

Beet pulp (BP)

Various seaweed products (SWP): Brown Algae

(alone or prefermented with rapeseed), Ocean Feed

Basal diets (One at a time)

Additives (One at a time)

Output - Total gas

- Methane

Maize silage (MS)

Degraded feed

(Microbiota profile)

2 systems: - Ankom - BPC

Cu

mu

lati

ve

pre

ssu

re

Time

Rumen fluid

• TG produced from pure maize silage (MS), sugar beet pulp (BP), brown algae species (BA) and Ocean Feed (OF)

• Sea weed products: virtually no gas production in rumen

(Low fermentability)

Rumen fermentation of seaweed products

15/11/2017 13

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 3 6 9 12 18 24 36 48To

tal g

as

pro

du

ctio

n in

mL/

g D

M

Duration of incubation (hours)

Effect of seaweeds on in vitro rumen gas production

15/11/2017 14

Basal feeds Additives % reduction

MS BA 18.2

OF 12.9

Basal feeds Additives % reduction

BP BA 21.3

OF 18.0

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 3 6 9 12 18 24 36 48To

tal g

as

pro

du

ctio

n in

mL/

g D

M

Duration of incubation (hours

18.2%

Maize silage

0

50

100

150

200

250

0 3 6 9 12 18 24 36 48

To

tal g

as

pro

du

ced

in

ml/

g D

M

Duration of incubation (hours)

21.3%

Beet pulp

Pure

Pure

Effect of seaweeds on in vitro rumen methane release

Basal feed Additves % reduction

MS BA 32

OF 12.5

15/11/2017 15

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 3 6 9 12 18 24 36 48

Meth

an

e r

ele

ase

d (

ml/

g D

M)

Duration of incubation (hours)

32%

a b c d

e f

a b c d

e f

0

20

40

60

80

100

MBA MOF MRBA BBA BOF BRBA

Perc

en

tag

e D

M d

eg

rad

ed

SWP mixed with MS or BP

Observed

Predicted

a

b b

c c

0

20

40

60

80

100

BA OF RBA MS BPPerc

en

tag

e D

M d

eg

rad

ed

Pure MS, BP and SWP

% digestibility of pure (0.5g):

• BA=21.9

• OF=51.5

• RBA=50.7

• MS =78.5

• BP =85.5

% degradability of feed mix: (0.5g MS + 0.1g SWP)

- Observed

- Theoretical

Effect of seaweeds on in vitro rumen feed degradation

Take home messages:

• The two seaweed products: • very low fermentability in the rumen

• very little gas produced during fermentation

• Brown Algae and to less extent Ocean Feed: • reduced total gas production from feeds by up to

21% depending on seaweed product and basal feed.

• Specifically inhibited methane production by up to 32%

• AND, importantly, rumen in vitro degradability of feeds was not affected

• Next step: • Identify and test bioactive components

• Test in live animals

15/11/2017 17

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank MAB4 and FEX for funding my PhD and University of Copenhagen for hosting my study.

I would also like to thank Mette Olaf Nielsen (Professor) and Hanne Helene Hansen (Associate Professor) for supervision

15/11/2017 18

Thank You

15/11/2017 19